INTRODUCTION: The American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) guidelines for hepatitis B management have progressed over time. However, adherence to quality metrics for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) care needs to be evaluated, especially in settings where liver specific clinics are not part of the system. Our study aims to evaluate the adherence to quality of care metrics in CHB patients in a predominately African American patient population general Gastroenterology clinic in an academic medical center. METHODS: We performed a cohort chart review on 92 patients with ICD 9 or 10 codes for CHB. Patients co-infected with HIV were excluded from analysis as they were treated by Infectious Disease clinics. We identified 45 patients following up with our Gastroenterology clinic for CHB with a visit between 2017 and 2018. We gathered demographic data. Adherence metrics were collected including HAV vaccination, treatment guideline relevant metrics, timely measurement of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), platelets and hepatitis B virus DNA level check to monitor for treatment response HBV status. Hepatocellular carcinoma screening measure. RESULTS: Our patient population was 65% African American,17% Asian,13% Caucasian and 5% other races. All treated patients had >2000 in HBV DNA levels and high ALT prior to treatment, whereas untreated patients had low HBV DNA and normal ALT with the exception of 1 patient under consideration for treatment. Hepatocellular cancer screening adherence was significantly high in both treated (80%) and untreated (84%) patients with 6 monthly imaging studies. Both treated and untreated patient had relatively high compliance (68%) with HAV vaccination. All the patients had ALT, AST and platelets so that APRI score could be checked every 6 months to provide an indirect assessment of fibrosis. Timely evaluation of fibrosis specific assessments has not been completed in most of the cases, and there was no consensus with respect to the preferred method for assessing fibrosis. CONCLUSION: Our finding reflects satisfactory adherence with AASLD guidelines particularly in areas of treatment indications, regular laboratory check, hepatocellular carcinoma screening and compliance with HAV vaccination. However, fibrosis evaluation was suboptimal according to guidelines. Given the access to Fibroscan in our practice, once yearly assessment is being recommended for our patients. Supported in part by an Investigator Initiated Grant from Gilead Sciences.
Read full abstract