<h3>Introduction</h3> Background: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been safely and successfully applied in patients with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardiac devices, and reviewed in a number of case reports (1, 2). Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices (CRT-D), available with and without defibrillation, benefit patients with Heart Failure with reduced ejection fraction (HfreF) by improving left ventricular function, optimizing ventricular filling, and confers benefits in quality of life and mortality (3). There are currently no case reports on the use of ECT in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. <h3>Methods</h3> Methods: Patient is a 68-year-old male with a history of major depressive disorder, PTSD, cluster B personality traits who presented in December 2019 for suicidal ideation in the context of a major depressive episode. His medical history is notable for atrial fibrillation on warfarin, DM2 on insulin, non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with HFREF. In 2015, patient's Implantable cardioverter-defribillator (ICD) was replaced with CRT-D. He has a history of 4 previous suicide attempts, most recently four years ago as well as a history of self-injurious behavior. His suicidal ideation on this admission was notable for newly observed command auditory hallucinations telling him to harm himself, suggestive of a mood-congruent psychosis. Patient was started on low-dose risperidone. His other psychotropic medications included bupropion, venlafaxine, and gabapentin with multiple failed medication trials in the past. Patient's initial MADRS was 30 on admission scoring highly for suicidal ideation. After initiation of risperidone, patient's MADRS lowered to 16 prior to first ECT session. Prior to ECT, anesthesia, cardiology, and electrophysiology were consulted. Patient's CRT-D device was interrogated and determined to be functioning and patient was medically optimized for ECT from cardiology standpoint. His ejection fraction was 30% approximately 6 months earlier. Anesthesia expressed concern about management of sympathetic and parasympathetic response to ECT. <h3>Results</h3> Results: Prior to first session, Electrophysiology reprogrammed device and patient had defibrillator pads placed. A brief seizure was achieved. Due to no observed bradycardia after first session, the electrophysiologist recommended patient can undergo further ECT with placement of magnet on CRT-D to disable defibrillator. For the following 3 sessions, an adequate seizure was obtained. Patient reported robust response with MADRS of 6 reported prior to his second session. During ECT therapy, patient underwent echocardiogram which indicated ejection fraction of 20-25%. Cardiology was again consulted and felt patient could continue with ECT if euvolemic and asymptomatic. After 4<sup>th</sup> session, a collaborative decision was made with patient to forego further ECT given patient's improvement in mood. Patient returned for another course of 3 sessions of ECT 8 months later and one maintenance session 9 months later. For these sessions, a magnet was used exclusively to disable fibrillator with robust effect on depressive symptoms. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Conclusion: This case indicates ECT can be provided safely to patients with a CRT-D device over an extended period of time; placing device in electrocautery mode with defibrillator pads as well as disabling defibrillator function with a magnet both proved effective methods to provide ECT safely. Further study of ECT in patients with CRT is warranted, in particular, to observe patients who complete a number of sessions more typical in treatment resistant depression. ECT in patients with CRT-P devices have not been reported. <h3>This research was funded by</h3> none