Low-dose Ipilimumab Research Articles

Multicenter phase I/II trial of encorafenib with and without binimetinib in combination with nivolumab and low-dose ipilimumab in metastatic BRAF-mutant melanoma.

TPS9596 Background: Targeted therapy (BRAF + MEK inhibitors) and immunotherapy (anti-PD1 + anti-CTLA4) have improved overall survival for metastatic or unresectable BRAFV600E/Kmutant melanoma. Whereas targeted therapy has a high response rate, immunotherapy may deliver longer term disease control for a larger number of patients. Despite these treatments, patients with high risk metastatic melanoma such as those with brain or liver metastases, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and bulky disease have inferior treatment outcomes with current therapies. A BRAF+MEK+PDL1 regimen has recently emerged however the role for this treatment remains unclear. Several recent trials combining MEK inhibition and immunotherapy have failed possibly because MEK inhibition can compromise T cell activation. Meanwhile the addition of CTLA4 blockade to PD1 inhibition appears to disproportionately benefit patients with non-T cell-inflamed tumors and potentially high-risk disease. For patients with high risk BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma, further investigation of BRAF/MEK targeted and PD-1/CTLA-4 directed immunotherapy combination strategies remains a priority. Methods: This is an open label, multi-site, Phase 1/2 study of encorafenib (Enco) +/- binimetinib (Bini) + nivolumab (Nivo) + ipilimumab (Ipi) for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic BRAF-mutated melanoma in high-risk cohorts (NCT04655157). An initial regimen confirming Phase I approach will be pursued on two schedules concurrently, with patients accruing equally to each group. Group 1 will receive 3mg/kg Nivo, and 1 mg/kg Ipi and 300mg Enco (12 participants, triple therapy) and Group 2 will receive 3mg/kg Nivo and 1mg/kg Ipi and 450mg Enco and 45mg Bini, (12 participants, quadruple therapy). Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) will be evaluated weeks 1-6. A recommended Phase II regimen (RP2R) [either triple or quadruple therapy] will be carried forward into two high risk metastatic disease cohort expansions of 30 participants each. Cohort 1 will include patients with symptomatic brain metastases, while cohort 2 will include patients with elevated LDH as well as either liver metastases OR bulky visceral disease (sum of longest diameters > 44mm). Patients meeting criteria for cohorts 1 and 2 will be placed in cohort 1. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases will be included with an ECOG up to 2 and on ≤ 4mg of dexamethasone or equivalent. Continuous Bayesian toxicity monitoring will be used throughout to monitor DLT. Pre and on-treatment tumor biopsies will assess changes in the tumor microenvironment while peripheral blood ctDNA and T cell Ki67% changes will assess early response and immune activation during triplet and quadruplet therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04655157.

A Pilot Study of Short-course Nivolumab and Low-dose Ipilimumab for Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma: Brown University Oncology Research Group Trial, BrUOG 324.

Combined cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 and programmed death 1 inhibitor blockade is a promising strategy in advanced melanoma and other solid tumors. This pilot study assessed the safety and toxicity of nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab in patients with high-risk completely resected melanoma. Patients received ipilimumab, 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks, and nivolumab, 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, for a total of 24 weeks (4 cycles). The primary objective was to assess the toxicity of the combined regimen. Twenty-one patients with resected melanoma were enrolled. One patient was stage IIC, 16 patients were stage III and 4 patients had resected stage 4 disease. Ten of 21 (48%) had grade 3 treatment-related toxicities but there was no grade 4 or grade 5 toxicities. The rate of grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities exceeded the toxicity limits defined by the study. Fifteen of 21 patients (71%) completed all 4 cycles of therapy. The median follow-up is 41 months. The 2-year recurrence-free survival is 85.7% and the 2-year overall survival is 90.5%. A 6-month course of nivolumab and low-dose ipilimumab may be a promising adjuvant treatment for patients with resected melanoma. Further studies of this regimen are indicated.

An Investigator-Initiated Phase 2 Study of Nivolumab Plus Low-Dose Ipilimumab as First-Line Therapy for Microsatellite Instability-High Advanced Gastric or Esophagogastric Junction Cancer (NO LIMIT, WJOG13320G/CA209-7W7).

Simple SummaryMicrosatellite instability-high (MSI-H) is an established biomarker for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). ICIs are not usually administered in the first-line setting for MSI-H tumors including gastric cancer (GC), although such tumors tend to be less responsive to cytotoxic chemotherapy compared with microsatellite-stable tumors. On the basis of evidence suggesting that nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab can improve survival in MSI-H colorectal cancer, we plan to investigate the efficacy and safety of this regimen for MSI-H GC, which accounts for ~5% of all GC cases. The NO LIMIT study (WJOG13320G/CA209-7W7) is an investigator-initiated, single-arm, open-label, 14-center phase 2 trial of nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab for MSI-H GC in the first-line setting. Its primary objective is to determine the overall response rate for the study treatment as assessed by blinded independent central review. The planned number of subjects is 28.Nivolumab (NIVO) plus low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) has shown a promising survival benefit in first-line treatment of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer. We hypothesized that this regimen might also be beneficial for MSI-H gastric cancer (GC), which accounts for ~5% of all GC cases. NO LIMIT (WJOG13320G/CA209-7W7) is an investigator-initiated, single-arm, open-label, 14-center phase 2 trial of NIVO plus low-dose IPI for MSI-H GC in the first-line setting. Eligibility criteria include unresectable advanced, recurrent, or metastatic gastric or esophagogastric junction cancer with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma; confirmed MSI-H status with the MSI-IVD Kit (FALCO); no prior systemic anticancer therapy; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1; and a measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1. The primary objective of the study is to determine the overall response rate (ORR) for the NIVO+IPI regimen as assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points include progression-free survival, overall survival, duration of response, safety, tolerability, and biomarkers. The number of patients was set at 28 on the basis of the threshold and expected ORR values of 35 and 65%, respectively, with a one-sided alpha error of 0.025 and power of 0.80. Subjects will receive treatment with nivolumab (240 mg) biweekly in combination with ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) every 6 weeks. The results of this study should clarify the therapeutic potential of NIVO+IPI for MSI-H GC in the first-line setting. Trial registration: JapicCTI-205400.

Subgroup analyses of patients (pts) with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with nivolumab (NIVO) plus low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) as first-line (1L) therapy:Two-year clinical update.

58 Background: In the phase 2 CheckMate 142 trial, NIVO + low-dose IPI had robust, durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated as 1L therapy for MSI-H/dMMR mCRC (median follow-up, 29.0 months [range, 24.2–33.7]) (Lenz et al. J Clin Oncol 2020;38:Abstract 4040; NCT02060188). Objective response rate (ORR) per investigator (INV) was achieved in 69% of pts (95% CI, 53–82); progressive disease rate was 13%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. Median duration of treatment was 19.1 months (95% CI, 11.1–29.0). Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 22% of pts. We present the post hoc subgroup analyses of efficacy and safety outcomes in pts from the same follow-up based on demographics and baseline disease characteristics. Methods: Pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC and no prior treatment for metastatic disease received NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W + low-dose IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W until disease progression or discontinuation. ORR (primary endpoint, RECIST v1.1) and PFS were assessed per INV. Post hoc subgroup analyses of efficacy (by ECOG performance status [PS], stage at initial diagnosis, primary tumor location, and BRAF/KRAS mutation status) and safety (by age and ECOG PS) are presented. Results: Among 45 treated pts, efficacy (Table) and safety were generally consistent across evaluated subgroups. ORR was similar in pt subgroups by BRAF/ KRAS mutation status, stage at initial diagnosis, primary tumor location, and ECOG PS (Table). Median PFS and OS were not reached (NR) in evaluated subgroups after a minimum follow-up of 24.2 months (Table). Incidence of grade 3–4 TRAEs for subgroups by age and ECOG PS were consistent with the overall population. Conclusions: NIVO + low-dose IPI demonstrated robust, durable clinical benefit; was well tolerated with 2-year follow-up; and was consistent in evaluated subgroups in 1L MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT02060188. [Table: see text]

Low-dose ipilimumab plus nivolumab combined with IL-2 and hyperthermia in cancer patients with advanced disease: exploratory findings of a case series of 131 stage IV cancers \u2013 a retrospective study of a single institution

The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients with previously treated or untreated stage III or IV melanoma has by now reached 63% using ipilimumab and nivolumab therapy. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 59% of patients leading to discontinuation of therapy in 24.5% of patients and one death. Therapy with checkpoint inhibitors could be safer and more effective in combination with hyperthermia and fever inducing therapies. We conducted a retrospective analysis to test the safety and efficacy of a new combination immune therapy in 131 unselected stage IV solid cancer patients with 23 different histological types of cancer who exhausted all conventional treatments. Treatment consisted of locoregional- and whole-body hyperthermia, individually dose adapted interleukin 2 (IL-2) combined with low-dose ipilimumab (0.3 mg/kg) plus nivolumab (0.5 mg/kg). The objective response rate (ORR) was 31.3%, progression-free survival (PFS) was 10 months, survival probabilities at 6 months was 86.7% (95% CI, 81.0–92.8%), at 9 months was 73.5% (95% CI, 66.2–81.7%), at 12 months was 66.5% (95% CI, 58.6–75.4%), while at 24 months survival was 36.6% (95% CI:28.2%; 47.3%). irAEs of World Health Organization (WHO) Toxicity Scale grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 were observed in 23.66%, 16.03%, 6.11%, and 2.29% of patients, respectively. Our results suggest that the irAEs profile of the combined treatment is safer than that of the established protocols without compromising efficacy.

Nivolumab (NIVO) + low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) as first-line (1L) therapy in microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Two-year clinical update.

4040 Background: In the phase 2 CheckMate 142 trial, NIVO + low-dose IPI had robust, durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated as 1L therapy for MSI-H/dMMR mCRC (median follow-up 13.8 months [mo; range, 9–19]; Lenz et al. Ann Oncol 2018;29:LBA18). Longer follow-up is presented here. Methods: Patients (pts) with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC and no prior treatment for metastatic disease received NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W + low-dose IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W until disease progression or discontinuation. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed (INV) objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Results: In 45 pts with median follow-up of 29.0 mo, ORR (95% CI) increased to 69% (53–82) (Table) from 60% (44.3–74.3); complete response (CR) rate increased to 13% from 7%. The concordance rate of INV and blinded independent central review was 89%. Median duration of response (DOR) was not reached (Table). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached, and 24-mo rates were 74% and 79%, respectively (Table). Nineteen pts discontinued study treatment without subsequent therapy. An analysis of tumor response post discontinuation will be presented. Ten (22%) pts had grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); 3 (7%) had grade 3–4 TRAEs leading to discontinuation. Conclusions: NIVO + low-dose IPI continued to show robust, durable clinical benefit with a deepening of response, and was well tolerated with no new safety signals identified with longer follow-up. NIVO + low-dose IPI may represent a new 1L therapy option for pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Clinical trial information: NTC02060188 . [Table: see text]

Significant antitumor activity for low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) with pembrolizumab (PEMBRO) immediately following progression on PD1 Ab in melanoma (MEL) in a phase II trial.

10004 Background: Combination PD1 + CTLA4 antibodies (Abs) shows greater response rate (RR) versus PD1 Ab alone in MEL, but RR after initial PD1 Ab progression awaits robust investigation. CTLA4 Ab alone after PD1 Ab progression has a historical RR of 13%. We report final results of the first prospective clinical trial evaluating IPI 1mg/kg + PEMBRO immediately following progression on PD1 Ab (NCT02743819). Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced MEL, no prior CTLA4 Ab for metastatic disease, and who had progressed on PD1 Ab as immediately prior therapy (or non-CTLA4 Ab combination) were eligible. Pts received PEMBRO 200 mg + IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W for 4 doses, then PEMBRO alone for up to two years. The primary endpoint was RR by irRECIST. After 35 pts, the study met its primary endpoint with 10/22 evaluable pts achieving a response. The trial was expanded to enroll a total of 70 pts in open-label accrual to further describe the RR for this regimen in an exploratory fashion. The data analysis cutoff was January 30, 2020. Results: 67/70 accrued patients were evaluable for treatment response. Prior treatments included 60 on PD1 Ab alone and 10 on PD1 Ab-based combinations. Of these, 10 pts had progressed in the adjuvant setting. Median length of treatment on prior PD1 Ab was 4.8 months. Response assessments included 4 CR, 17 PR and 16 SD for a RR of 31% (21/67) in evaluable pts, and 30% (21/70) in all enrolled pts. 4 pts with a PR and 6 with SD had unconfirmed responses making the irRECIST response rate 25% (17/67) and 24% (17/70) among evaluable and enrolled pts, respectively. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.7 mo (95% CI: 2.8-8.3) and PFS at six months was 45% (95% CI: 33%-57%). 15/70 (21%) pts experienced ≥ grade 3-4 drug-related AEs, the most common being diarrhea, rash and transaminase elevation. PD-L1 positive vs negative status from historical tumor specimens did not associate with RR. Conclusions: This is the largest prospective study of IPI 1mg/kg + PEMBRO, demonstrating significant antitumor activity and tolerability in MEL post-PD1 Ab. Clinical trial information: NCT02743819.

A phase II single-arm study of nivolumab and ipilimumab (Nivo/Ipi) in previously treated classical Kaposi sarcoma (CKS).

11518 Background: CKS is a mesenchymal neoplasm associated with HHV8 infection. Though recombinant INFa is approved for treatment of AIDS-related KS, data is limited regarding the role of immune modulation in CKS therapy. Based on favorable responses in viral-induced cancers, we hypothesized that CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade can induce tumor regression in CKS. We present pre-planned interim analysis of a phase II study of Nivo/Ipi in previously treated progressive CKS. Methods: CKS pts with progressive disease after > 1 line of systemic therapy and measurable disease received nivolumab 240mg d1,15,28 and ipilimumab 1mg/kg d1 q42 days until progression or toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) evaluated clinically, radiologically (RECIST) and metabolically (FDG-PET). Secondary endpoints include 6-months progression free survival rate (PFS) and safety. Exploratory endpoints included PD-L1/MMR by IHC, DNAseq (596 genes)/RNAseq (whole transcriptome) of tumor and matched blood specimens to explore CKS genomic traits and IO correlates: TMB and MSI status, MMR and PD-L1 protein expression, and immune gene transcript expression (PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4, and others) (Tempus Labs, Chicago, IL, USA). Results: Fifteen patients were enrolled and evaluable (Apr18-Jan20). Median age 72.5 (61-81), all male. At a median FU of 15.7 mo ORR as per RECIST was 66% (9 pts PR, 1 pt CR, 2 pts SD, 3 pts NE). Clinical ORR was 87% and metabolic ORR was 60%. Median PFS was not reached, 6mo PFS rate was 85% and 1y PFS rate was 75%. The safety profile was as expected with all pts experiencing G1 toxicity, 3 pts with G2 toxicity (1 hepatic, 2 asymptomatic lipase increase) and 2 pts with G3 toxicity (1 colitis, 1 asymptomatic lipase increase). One SAE was reported (TIA considered not related to therapy) and treatment was discontinued in 3 pts. Correlative results are available for 8 pts showing a trend for copy number loss in genes with tumor-suppressive activity (FOXA1, ELF3), no PDL1 expression, low TMB, microsatellite stability, but marked overexpression of CTLA-4, PD-1, PDL-1, CD40, OX40 and LAG3 RNA immune transcripts. Conclusions: The interim analysis of this prospective phase II study of nivolumab and low-dose ipilimumab demonstrates promising activity in progressive CKS, with 66% ORR and a 6mo PFS rate of 85%. Toxicity profile is as expected in this class of drugs. Correlative studies are preliminary, but warrant further investigation into genomic traits and immune gene expression profiles. Clinical trial information: NCT03219671. Clinical trial information: NCT03219671 .

Nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab as first-line therapy in microsatellite instability-high/DNA mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer: Clinical update.

11 Background: In the phase 2 CheckMate 142 trial, nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab provided robust and durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated as first-line therapy for microsatellite instability-high/DNA mismatch repair deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) (Lenz et al. Ann Oncol 2018;29:LBA18). Longer follow-up data will be presented. Methods: Patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC and no prior treatment for metastatic disease received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus low-dose ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks until disease progression or discontinuation. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Results: For all 45 patients (median follow-up was 13.8 months), ORR was 60% (95% CI 44.3–74.3). Responses were consistent with the overall population across subgroups including age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, prior adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy, and mutation status (Table). Seven patients (16%) had grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events; 3 (7%) had any grade treatment-related adverse events leading to discontinuation. Updated response, survival, and safety data after a longer follow-up (median 19.9 months) will be presented. Conclusions: Nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab demonstrated robust and durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated. Evaluated subgroups had responses consistent with the overall population. Nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab may represent a new first-line treatment option for patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT02060188. [Table: see text]

A phase III study of nivolumab (NIVO), NIVO + ipilimumab (IPI), or chemotherapy (CT) for microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Checkmate 8HW.

TPS266 Background: Patients (pts) with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC treated with CT have poorer outcomes than pts with microsatellite stable/MMR proficient mCRC. NIVO (anti–programmed death [PD]-1) and IPI (anti–cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 [CTLA-4]) are immune checkpoint inhibitors that act synergistically and promote antitumor immune response by complementary mechanisms. NIVO±IPI received accelerated US FDA approval for MSI-H/dMMR mCRC that progressed after fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan treatment based on the phase 2, non-randomized, multicohort CheckMate 142 study. Indirect comparisons suggest that NIVO (3 mg/kg) + low-dose IPI (1 mg/kg) provides improved clinical benefit vs NIVO (investigator-assessed [INV] objective response rate [ORR] 55% vs 31%; 12-month [mo] INV progression-free survival [PFS] rate 71% vs 50%; 12-mo overall survival [OS] rate 85% vs 73%) with a favorable benefit-risk profile for previously treated MSI-H/dMMR mCRC (Overman et al. JCO 2018). NIVO+low-dose IPI also demonstrated robust and durable clinical benefit in first-line MSI-H/dMMR mCRC (INV ORR 64%; 12-mo INV PFS rate 77%; 12-mo OS rate 84%; Lenz et al. ASCO 2019, #3521). To date, no prospective phase 3 studies have reported results for anti–PD-1, anti–PD-1 + anti–CTLA-4, or CT in MSI-H/dMMR mCRC; these treatments will be evaluated in the international, multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 CheckMate 8HW (NCT04008030) study. Methods: Approximately 494 pts aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed recurrent or mCRC, irrespective of prior treatment with CT and/or targeted agents, not amenable to surgery, and with known tumor MSI-H or dMMR status, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1 will be randomized to receive NIVO, NIVO+IPI, or investigator’s choice CT (pts in the CT arm can receive NIVO+IPI upon progression). The primary endpoint is PFS, assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints include PFS by INV, ORR and disease control rate by BICR and INV, OS, time to and duration of response. Exploratory endpoints include safety. Clinical trial information: NCT04008030.

VESTIGE: Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Patients With Resected Esophageal, Gastroesophageal Junction and Gastric Cancer Following Preoperative Chemotherapy With High Risk for Recurrence (N+ and/or R1): An Open Label Randomized Controlled Phase-2-Study.

Background: Perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery is one recommended standard treatment for patients with resectable gastric and esophageal cancer. Even with a multimodality treatment more than half of patients will relapse following surgical resection. Patients who have a poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and have an incomplete (R1) resection or have metastatic lymph nodes in the resection specimen (N+) are especially at risk of recurrence. Current clinical practice is to continue with the same chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting as before surgery. In the phase II randomized EORTC VESTIGE trial (NCT03443856), patients with high risk resected gastric or esophageal adenocarcinoma will be randomized to either adjuvant chemotherapy (as before surgery) or to immunotherapy with nivolumab and low dose ipilimumab (nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W plus Ipilimumab 1 mg/kg IV Q6W for 1 year). The primary endpoint of the study is disease free survival, with secondary endpoints of overall survival, safety and toxicity, and quality of life. This is an open label randomized controlled multi-center phase-2 superiority trial. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to study arms. The trial will recruit 240 patients; recruitment commenced July 2019 and is anticipated to take 30 months. Detailed inclusion/exclusion criteria, toxicity management guidelines, and statistical plans for EORTC VESTIGE are described in the manuscript.Clinical Trial Registration: The trial is registered with www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03443856.

Nivolumab Plus Low-Dose IPILIMUMAB as First-Line Treatment of Advanced NSCLC: Overall Survival Analysis of Checkmate 817

Abstract Background Nivolumab (NIVO) + ipilimumab (IPI) combination demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) benefits vs chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC in both tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 1% and Methods Patients with previously untreated stage IV or recurrent NSCLC, and no known sensitizing EGFR or ALK alterations, were eligible regardless of PD-L1 expression. Cohort A (n = 391) had ECOG performance status (PS) 0–1; cohort A1 (special populations; n = 198) had ECOG PS 2 or a specified comorbidity (asymptomatic untreated brain metastases, hepatic or renal impairment, or HIV). Patients were treated with NIVO 240 mg Q2W + low-dose IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W for 2 years or until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. Safety in cohort A was the primary endpoint; efficacy endpoints were secondary/exploratory; A1 safety and efficacy analyses were exploratory. Results Baseline characteristics apart from ECOG PS and comorbidities were similar between cohorts. With minimum follow-up of 21 months (A) and 14 months (A1), median OS was 17.0 months and 9.9 months, respectively. At 1 year, 60% of patients in A and 47% of patients in A1 were alive. OS by PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden levels will be presented. The safety profile (type and rate of treatment-related adverse events [TRAEs]) was consistent between the cohorts. The range of median time to onset of select TRAEs was similar between cohorts A (2–26 weeks) and A1 (2–21 weeks). The majority of select TRAEs have resolved (40%–100%). Conclusion Select TRAE profile of NIVO + low-dose IPI was similar between cohorts A and A1. Durable OS outcomes were observed with first-line NIVO+IPI in patients with advanced NSCLC (cohort A) and were comparable to CheckMate 227; although as expected, comorbidities and/or poor performance status impacted outcomes in cohort A1. Clinical trial identification NCT02869789. Editorial acknowledgement Writing and editorial assistance was provided by Mhairi Laird, PhD, of Caudex and funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb. Legal entity responsible for the study Bristol-Myers Squibb. Funding Bristol-Myers Squibb. Disclosure F. Barlesi: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly Oncology, F. Hoffmann–La Roche Ltd, Novartis, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Takeda; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly Oncology, F. Hoffmann–La Roche Ltd, Novartis, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Takeda; Research grant / Funding (institution): AbbVie, ACEA, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eisai, Eli Lilly Oncology, F. Hoffmann–La Roche Ltd, Genentech, Ipsen, Ignyta, Innate Pharma, Loxo, Novartis, Medimmune, Merck, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis,; Non-remunerated activity/ies: Principal Investigator for AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Pierre Fabre and Roche sponsored trials (or ISR). C. Audigier-Valette: Honoraria (self): AbbVie, Pfizer; Honoraria (institution): Roche, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Pfizer. E. Felip: Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Blue Print Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Guardant Health, Janssen, Medscape, Merck KGaA, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, TouchTime; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck KGaA, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda. T-E. Ciuleanu: Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, Amgen, Roche, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, AstraZeneca, MSD, Sanofi, Novartis, Servier, AD Pharma. K. Jao: Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Merck, Takeda, Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca/CIOSK. J-S. Aucoin: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca, Merck, Pfizer, Roche. K. Vermaelen: Honoraria (self): MSD, Roche; Honoraria (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb. O. Aren Frontera: Full / Part-time employment: Pfizer. N. Ready: Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, G1 therapeutics, Merck, Genentech, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb – unbranded speaker, Celgene – unbranded speaker; Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, G1 therapeutics, Merck, Genentech, AbbVie; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers Squibb – unbranded speaker, Celgene – unbranded speaker; Research grant / Funding (self): Merck investigator-initiated trial. A. Curioni: Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Takeda. H. Linardou: Advisory / Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, AstraZeneca, Roche; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca. R. Pillai: Research grant / Funding (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb. S. Li: Full / Part-time employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb. A. Acevedo: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Full / Part-time employment: Bristol-Myers Squibb. L. Paz-Ares: Honoraria (self): Roche, MSD, Lilly, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Sanofi, Pharmamar, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Takeda, Celgene, Servier, Sysmex, Incyte, Ipsen, Adacap, Bayer, Blueprint; Leadership role: Altum Sequencing; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Single-center real-life experience with low-dose ipilimumab monotherapy in adjuvant setting for patients with stage III melanoma.

Ipilimumab is approved for adjuvant melanoma treatment at a dose of 10 mg/kg, but its use is limited owing to high toxicity and treatment-associated costs. We retrospectively analyzed 29 patients who underwent complete resection of stage IIC-III melanoma and were treated with ipilimumab 3 mg/kg in an adjuvant setting. The aim was to assess development of adverse events (primary endpoint) and to evaluate survival outcomes (secondary endpoint) under adjuvant treatment with ipilimumab in a real-life setting. Immune-related adverse events (irAE) of all grades were reported in 72.4% of patients, grade 3 in 5.3% (n = 2), and none for grade 4 or 5. Immune-related hypophysitis resolved in 3/8 (37.5%) and immune-related thyroiditis in 7/10 (70%) cases, whereas the others remained on substitution drugs. The rest irAEs affected the gut (n = 8), skin (n = 5), liver (n = 2), and uvea (n = 2) and resolved completely. Only one patient required tumor necrosis factor-α owing to grade 3 colitis. Hospitalization was required in five cases owing to irAE (four colitis and one hypophysitis). At a median follow-up of 9.7 (1.7-16.8) months, 65.5% of the patients were free of disease. Median progression-free survival was 15.1 months, and median overall survival was not reached yet. Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg for the adjuvant treatment of high-risk patients with fully resected melanoma favors a better safety profile compared with the approved dose of 10 mg/kg in the same setting. Although its limited application owing lately promising data of antiprogrammed cell death protein-1 treatment, it may be considered as additional option or second-line treatment after fully resected disease recurrence under antiprogrammed cell death protein-1 treatment.

LBA4_PR - Nivolumab (NIVO) + low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) vs platinum-doublet chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line (1L) treatment (tx) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): CheckMate 227 part 1 final analysis

LBA4_PR - Nivolumab (NIVO) + low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) vs platinum-doublet chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line (1L) treatment (tx) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): CheckMate 227 part 1 final analysis

Perspectives on Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.

Despite lengthening survival, death rates from metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) remain unacceptably high, with a bright spot being the demonstration of durable responses in patients with CRC who have mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) and/or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors and are treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab, as well as nivolumab in combination with low-dose ipilimumab-all checkpoint inhibitors-are currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for patients with MSI-H/dMMR metastatic CRC that progressed following treatment with a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. Nonetheless, there are a number of questions and considerations in the use of these checkpoint inhibitor therapies. Using a question-and-answer format, this review summarizes the scientific rationale for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in CRC, including the effects of tumor factors such as genetic aberrations and mutational load on the immune response, particularly in patients with MSI-H/dMMR disease. We discuss response patterns, response criteria, and immune-related adverse events using findings from published efficacy and safety data of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic CRC. We also discuss issues surrounding treatment sequencing, incorporating approved checkpoint inhibitors into the current treatment paradigm, and the multiple investigational strategies that may optimize immunotherapy for advanced CRC in the future, including novel combination therapies. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the U.S. Despite advances in chemotherapy, survival remains poor for patients with metastatic CRC. Certain immunotherapy agents have demonstrated long-lasting responses in previously treated patients with immune-responsive microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient metastatic CRC, leading to U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of the immune checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab (with or without low-dose ipilimumab) and pembrolizumab in this population. Combination therapy (e.g., nivolumab with low-dose ipilimumab) has demonstrated numerically higher response rates and improved long-term clinical benefit relative to anti-programmed death-1 monotherapy. Ongoing trials are evaluating immunotherapy in the broader CRC population and novel combinations to optimize immunotherapy for advanced CRC.

Nivolumab (NIVO) + low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) as first-line (1L) therapy in microsatellite instability-high/DNA mismatch repair deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Clinical update.

3521 Background: In the phase 2 CheckMate 142 trial, NIVO + low-dose IPI provided robust and durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated as 1L therapy for MSI-H/dMMR mCRC (Lenz et al. Ann Oncol 2018;29:LBA18). Longer follow-up data will be presented. Methods: Patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC and no prior treatment for metastatic disease received NIVO 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks + low-dose IPI 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks until disease progression or discontinuation. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Results: For all 45 patients (median follow-up was 13.8 months), ORR was 60% (95% CI 44.3–74.3). Responses were consistent with the overall population across subgroups including age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, prior adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy, and mutation status (Table). Seven patients (16%) had grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); 3 (7%) had any grade TRAEs leading to discontinuation. Updated response, survival, and safety data after a longer follow-up (median 19.9 months) will be presented. Conclusions: NIVO + low-dose IPI demonstrated robust and durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated. Evaluated subgroups had responses consistent with the overall population. NIVO + low-dose IPI may represent a new 1L treatment option for patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT02060188. [Table: see text]

A sequential dual cohort phase II clinical trial on adjuvant low-dose nivolumab with or without low-dose ipilimumab as adjuvant therapy following the resection of melanoma macrometastases (MM).

9585 Background: Optimal dosing and duration of adjuvant treatment with anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors, e.g. nivolumab (NIVO), following complete resection of melanoma (MEL) lymph node metastases has not been established. We investigated a regimen of low-dose NIVO with/without low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) as adjuvant therapy in MEL pts. Methods: After complete resection of MM, pts were treated with IPI 50mg (fixed dose, 1x) plus NIVO 10mg (fixed dose, Q2w x4) (Cohort-A), or NIVO 10mg (Q2w x9, Q8w x4) (Cohort-B). One-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate served as primary endpoint. Sample size (34 pts) was calculated according to a Fleming one-stage clinical trial design. Recruitment to Cohort-B was closed prematurely following registration of NIVO in the adjuvant setting by EMA. Secondary endpoints were safety, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS). Quantitative measurement of BRAF/ NRAS mutant circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), as well as tumor gene expression profiling were performed. Results: 34 pts (15M/19F, 31 stage III/3 stage IV) and 22 pts (12M/10F, 21 stage III/1 stage IV) were enrolled in Cohort-A/-B, respectively. After a median follow-up of 86w for Cohort-A and 36w for Cohort-B, estimated 12 months (m) RFS-rate was respectively 55% (95% CI, 39–72) and 78% (95% CI, 73-82), 12m OS-rate was 97% (95% CI, 94-100) and 100%, and 12m DMFS-rate was 79% (95% CI, 92-65), no distant metastases occurred in Cohort-B. Median RFS for Cohort-A was 84w (95%, CI 28-139), not-reached in -B. Median DMFS and OS had not been reached at time of analysis in either cohort. All grade treatment-related adverse events were observed in 21 (61%)/17 (77%) with 3 (8%)/1 (4%) grade 3 irAE in Cohort-A/-B, respectively. One patient in Cohort-A had a detectable level of ctDNA at baseline and relapsed 33w after initiating treatment. Tumor profiling is ongoing at time of submission. Conclusions: The investigated adjuvant low-dose regimens have an acceptable safety profile. Survival rates resemble those of standard regimens. These regimens could be economically advantageous alternatives for pts without access to standard regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT02941744.

A phase II single-arm study of nivolumab and ipilimumab (Nivo/Ipi) in previously treated Classic Kaposi sarcoma (CKS).

11064 Background: CKS is an angioproliferative mesenchymal neoplasm causatively associated with human herpes virus 8 infection. Though recombinant IFNa is approved for treatment of AIDS-related KS, data is limited regarding the role of immune modulation in CKS therapy. Based on favorable responses in viral-induced cancers, we hypothesized that CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade can induce tumor regression in CKS. We present pre-planned interim analysis of a phase II study of Nivo/Ipi in previously treated progressive CKS (NCT03219671). Methods: CKS pts with progressive disease after ≥ 1 line of systemic therapy and measurable disease by PET/CT and/or physical exam received nivolumab 240mg d1,15,28 and ipilimumab 1mg/kg d1 q42 days until progression or toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), secondary endpoints include 6-months progression free survival rate (PFS) and safety. Correlative studies in tumor and serum samples are ongoing using an NGS panel for DNA and RNA and proteomic staining (Tempus Labs Inc). A pre-planned interim analysis was conducted after the first ten enrolled patients for efficacy and toxicity evaluation. Results: Ten patients were enrolled and evaluable between April2018 and February2019. Median age 72 (61-79), all male. At a median FU of 3.1 months (1.5-8.1) ORR was 50% (4 patients PR, 1 patient CR, 5 patients SD). Median PFS was not reached however no progression of disease was documented so far. The safety profile was as expected with all patients experiencing G1 toxicity and four patients with G2 toxicity (1 ALT/AST increase, 2 asymptomatic lipase increase). One SAE was reported (TIA considered not related to therapy) and treatment was discontinued in one patient (G2 LFT increase. maintaining CR 4 months after treatment discontinuation). Correlative results are pending. Conclusions: The interim analysis in this prospectively designed phase II study of nivolumab and low-dose ipilimumab demonstrate promising activity in progressive CKS, with 50% ORR and no events of progression thus far. We expect to report the updated efficacy and correlative data. Clinical trial information: NCT03219671.

Low Dose Ipilimumab With Pembrolizumab in Treating Patients With Melanoma That Has Spread to the Brain

Low Dose Ipilimumab With Pembrolizumab in Treating Patients With Melanoma That Has Spread to the Brain

Nivolumab (NIVO) + low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) in previously treated patients (pts) with microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Long-term follow-up.

635 Background: In the phase II CheckMate-142 trial, NIVO + low-dose IPI (1 mg/kg) provided meaningful clinical benefit in previously treated MSI-H/dMMR mCRC pts after a median follow-up of 13.4 mo. Here, we present long-term follow-up (median 25.4 mo) of these pts. Methods: Pts received NIVO 3 mg/kg + low-dose IPI Q3W (4 doses) followed by NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W until disease progression. Primary endpoint was investigator (INV)-assessed objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1). Results: Of 119 treated pts, 76% had ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy. ORR and disease control rates (DCR) were 58 and 81%, respectively (Table). Complete response (CR) rate increased with long-term follow-up from 3 (13.4 mo) to 6% (25.4 mo). Median duration of response (DOR) was not reached, with 68% of responses ongoing at data cutoff. At 24 mo, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 60 and 74%, respectively; OS rates were 96, 56, and 29% in pts with CR or partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD), respectively. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 31% of pts; 10% (grade 3–4) and 13% (any grade) of pts had TRAEs leading to discontinuation. Conclusions: Long-term follow-up with NIVO + low-dose IPI provides durable clinical benefit with deepening of response and a manageable safety profile with no new safety signals, demonstrating long-term benefit of NIVO + low-dose IPI for previously treated pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT02060188. [Table: see text]