Low-dose hCG Research Articles

Luteinizing hormone supplementation with human menopausal gonadotropin versus low dose human chorionic gonadotropin during ovarian stimulation does not affect live birth rates after fresh and frozen embryo transfer.

Luteinizing hormone (LH) plays an important role in ovarian follicle maturation. Human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) or low dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) can provide LH supplementation during in vitro fertilization (IVF) ovarian stimulation, though studies directly comparing their impact on IVF outcomes are limited. The aim of the study was to determine whether LH supplementation with hMG versus low dose hCG during IVF stimulation affects live birth rate. Fresh and frozen embryo transfers (ET) from 2017 to 2021 after standard long or antagonist protocols supplemented with hMG (75-250 IU) or low dose hCG (50-100 IU) during stimulation cycles in our academic center were included. Statistical analysis was performed with T-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, Chi-square, and multiple linear and logistic regression. Four hundred and sixty eight unique stimulation cycles resulting in 213 fresh and 412 frozen embryo transfers were analyzed. There was a lower mature oocyte yield (10.9 vs. 11.8, p = 0.044) but similar high-quality blastocyst yield (3.6 vs. 3.9, p = 0.11) for hMG vs low dose hCG. Live birth rates per transfer were comparable for fresh (42% vs. 49%, p = 0.24) and frozen (46% vs. 53%, p = 0.45) embryo transfers. Multiple logistic regressions showed no association between supplemental gonadotropin and live birth for both fresh and frozen embryo transfers. Fresh and frozen IVF-ET pregnancy outcomes were comparable after hMG versus low dose hCG supplementation, suggesting flexibility in supplemental LH dosing regimens that may address patient or physician preference or cost concerns.

Effect of Combined Low Dose Human Gonadotropic Hormone, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, and Testosterone Therapy (LFT Regimen) Versus Conventional High Dose Human Gonadotropic Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone on Spermatogenesis and Biomarkers in Men With Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism

ObjectiveIn male Congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism(CHH), it was observed that lower dose human gonadotropic hormone(hCG) can maintain normal intratesticular testosterone(ITT) levels. We propose this study to compare the Low-Dose hCG, follicle stimulating hormone(FSH), and Testosterone(T) [LFT Regimen] to conventional treatment to induce virilization and fertility. DesignThis open-label randomized pilot study was conducted from June 2020 to December 2021. Subjects and outcome measuresCHH were randomly assigned to either the LFT regimen (Group A)-low-dose hCG (500U thrice per week), FSH(150U thrice per week) and T(100mg biweekly) or conventional therapy(GroupB) with high hCG dose(2000U thrice per week) and the same FSH dose. The hCG dosage was titrated to reduce Anti-mullerian hormone(AMH) by 50% and normalization of plasma T in groups A and B, respectively. The primary objective was to compare the percentage of individuals who achieved spermatogenesis between the two groups. ResultsOut of 30 patients, 23(76·7%) subjects achieved spermatogenesis, and the median time was 12(9-14·9)months. There was no difference in achieving spermatogenesis between the two groups (64·3%vs87·5%,p=0·204), and even the median time for spermatogenesis was similar (15monthsvs12months,p=0·248). Both groups had non-significant median plasma AMH at spermatogenesis,[6·6ng/ml(3·3-9·76) vs 4·41ng/ml(2·3-6·47),p=0·298]. Similarly, the median plasma Inhibin B at spermatogenesis between groups were comparable[152·4pg/ml(101·7-198·0)vs149·1pg/ml(128·7-237·3),p=0·488]. ConclusionsA reasonable approach to induce fertility in male CHH is to initiate combination therapy using FSH, low-dose hCG targeting AMH <6·9 ng/ml, along with T to achieve normal range. Monitoring AMH could serve as a proxy indicator of spermatogenesis.

Low Dose hCG Support in Modified Natural Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles.

What is the effect of a single low-dose recombinant hCG injection after embryo transfer (ET) in letrozole-induced modified natural frozen embryo transfer cycles (mNC-FET)?. An observational study was conducted in the university-affiliated referral clinic between 2022 and 2024. Women aged 18-42 with at least one vitrified blastocyst obtained from the previous cycle(s) were included. Ovulation induction for endometrial preparation was initiated with oral letrozol (5mg/day) for five days. Ovulation was triggered using 6500IU rec hCG sc when the leading follicle > 17mm, endometrial thickness > 7.5mm, and serum progesterone (P) < 1.5ng/ml. All women received 30mg dydrogesterone/day po for additional five-day luteal support. On the 6th day, ET was performed. Based on a quasi-randomized design, a group of women additionally received a half single bolus of (3250IU) rec hCG (sc) on the morning of 3rd day of ET (hCG group). Women who did not receive additional hCG were assigned as controls.One hundred fifty-four women were detected to be eligible for the study among 2150 initiated FET cycles during the period.Demographic data of the groups, including mean women's age, BMI, serum AMH, and infertility etiologies, were comparable in terms of variables. Mean serum progesterone values and the number of transferred embryos were also similar. A significantly higher ongoing pregnancy/started cycle was documented in the hCG group than in controls (46.7% vs 33.6% respectively, p = 0.03*). A single low-dose hCG injection after ET may improve the OPRs of women in letrozole mNC-FET cycles.

Effect of GnRH agonist trigger with or without low-dose hCG on reproductive outcomes for PCOS women with freeze-all strategy: a propensity score matching study.

This study aimed to compare the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger alone versus dual trigger comprising GnRHa and low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on reproductive outcomes in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who received the freeze-all strategy. A total of 615 cycles were included in this retrospective cohort study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to control potential confounding factors between GnRHa-trigger group (0.2mg GnRHa) and dual-trigger group (0.2mg GnRHa plus 1000/2000IU hCG) in a 1:1 ratio. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to estimate the association between trigger methods and reproductive outcomes. After PSM, patients with dual trigger (n = 176) had more oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, and 2PN embryos compared to that with GnRHa trigger alone. However, the oocytes maturation rate, normal fertilization rate, and frozen embryos between the two groups were not statistically different. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (14.8% vs. 2.8%, P < 0.001) and moderate/severe OHSS (11.4% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in dual-trigger group than in GnRHa-alone group. Logistic regression analysis showed the adjusted odds ratio of dual trigger was 5.971 (95% confidence interval 2.201-16.198, P < 0.001) for OHSS. The pregnancy and single neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05). For PCOS women with freeze-all strategy, GnRHa trigger alone decreased the risk of OHSS without damaging oocyte maturation and achieved satisfactory pregnancy outcomes.

Androgen and inhibin B levels during ovarian stimulation before and after 8 weeks of low-dose hCG priming in women with low ovarian reserve.

Does 8 weeks of daily low-dose hCG administration affect androgen or inhibin B levels in serum and/or follicular fluid (FF) during the subsequent IVF/ICSI cycle in women with low ovarian reserve? Androgen levels in serum and FF, and inhibin B levels in serum, decreased following 8 weeks of hCG administration. Recently, we showed that 8 weeks of low-dose hCG priming, in between two IVF/ICSI treatments in women with poor ovarian responder (anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) <6.29 pmol/l), resulted in more follicles of 2-5 mm and less of 6-10-mm diameter at the start of stimulation and more retrieved oocytes at oocyte retrieval. The duration of stimulation and total FSH consumption was increased in the IVF/ICSI cycle after priming. Hypothetically, hCG priming stimulates intraovarian androgen synthesis causing upregulation of FSH receptors (FSHR) on granulosa cells. It was therefore unexpected that antral follicles were smaller and the stimulation time longer after hCG priming. This might indicate a different mechanism of action than previously suggested. Blood samples were drawn on stimulation day 1, stimulation days 5-6, trigger day, day of oocyte retrieval, and oocyte retrieval + 5 days in the IVF/ICSI cycles before and after hCG priming (the control and study cycles, respectively). FF was collected from the first aspirated follicle on both sides during oocyte retrieval in both cycles. The study was conducted as a prospective, paired, non-blinded, single-center study conducted between January 2021 and July 2021 at a tertiary care center. The 20 participants underwent two identical IVF/ICSI treatments: a control cycle including elective freezing of all blastocysts and a study cycle with fresh blastocyst transfer. The control and study cycles were separated by 8 weeks (two menstrual cycles) of hCG priming by daily injections of 260 IU recombinant hCG. Women aged 18-40 years with cycle lengths of 23-35 days and AMH <6.29 pmol/l were included. Control and study IVF/ICSI cycles were performed in a fixed GnRH-antagonist protocol. Inhibin B was lower on stimulation day 1 after hCG priming (P = 0.05). Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) was significantly lower on stimulation day 1 (P = 0.03), and DHEAS and androstenedione were significantly lower on stimulation days 5-6 after priming (P = 0.02 and P = 0.02) The testosterone level in FF was significantly lower in the study cycle (P = 0.008), while the concentrations of inhibin B and androstenedione in the FF did not differ between the study and control cycles. A lower serum inhibin B in the study cycle corresponds with the antral follicles being significantly smaller after priming, and this probably led to a longer stimulation time in the study cycle. This contradicts the theory that hCG priming increases the intraovarian androgen level, which in turn causes more FSHR on developing (antral up to preovulatory) follicles. However, based on this study, we cannot rule out that an increased intra-follicular androgen level was present at initiation of the ovarian stimulation, without elevating the androgen level in serum and that an increased androgen level may have rescued some small antral follicles that would have otherwise undergone atresia by the end of the previous menstrual cycle. We retrieved significantly more oocytes in the Study cycle, and the production of estradiol per follicle ≥10-mm diameter on trigger day was comparable in the study and control cycles, suggesting that the rescued follicles were competent in terms of producing oocytes and steroid hormones. The sample size was small, and the study was not randomized. Our study design did not allow for the measurement and comparison of androgen levels or FSHR expression in small antral follicles before and immediately after the hCG-priming period. The results make us question the mechanism of action behind hCG priming prior to IVF. It is important to design a study with the puncture of small antral follicles before and immediately after priming to investigate the proposed hypothesis. Improved cycle outcomes, i.e. more retrieved oocytes, must be confirmed in a larger, preferably randomized study. This study was funded by an unrestricted grant from Gedeon Richter awarded to the institution. A.P. reports personal consulting fees from PregLem SA, Novo Nordisk A/S, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Gedeon Richter Nordics AB, Cryos International, and Merck A/S outside the submitted work and payment or honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter Nordics AB, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Merck A/S, and Theramex and Organon & Co and payment for participation in an advisory board for Preglem. Grants to the institution have been provided by Gedeon Richter Nordics AB, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, and Merck A/S, and equipment and travel support has been given to the institution by Gedeon Richter Nordics AB. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04643925.

P-682 Androgen and Inhibin B levels during ovarian stimulation before and after eight weeks of low dose hCG priming in women with low ovarian reserve

Abstract Study question Does eight weeks of low dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)-priming affect androgen or Inhibin B levels in serum and follicular fluid during IVF/ICSI treatment? Summary answer Inhibin B was reduced on stimulation day 1 in the IVF/ICSI cycle following hCG-priming. Androgen levels in serum and follicular fluid was not increased. What is known already In our recently published pilot study, eight weeks of low-dose hCG-priming was used to stimulate the intraovarian androgen synthesis in women with AMH &amp;lt;6.29 pmol/L. Priming resulted in more retrieved oocytes and more follicles sized 2-5 mm and less sized 6-10 mm at the start of stimulation. Stimulation time and FSH consumption was increased after priming. HCG priming potentially stimulate the intraovarian androgen synthesis causing upregulation of FSH receptors on granulosa cells, and therefore it was unexpected that the antral follicles were smaller and stimulation time longer following priming. This might indicate a different mechanism of action than previously thought. Study design, size, duration A prospective, paired, non-blinded, single-center study including 20 women conducted between January 2021 and July 2021 at a tertiary referral hospital. Participants underwent two identical IVF treatments: a Control cycle including elective freezing of all blastocysts and a Study cycle with fresh blastocyst transfer. The Control and Study cycles were separated by eight weeks (two menstrual cycles) of hCG-priming by daily injections of 260 IE hCG (details in our previously published paper). Participants/materials, setting, methods Women aged 18-40 years with cycle lengths of 23-35 days and AMH &amp;lt;6.29 pmol/L. Control and Study IVF cycles were performed in a fixed GnRH-antagonist protocol. Blood samples were taken on stimulation day 1, stimulation day 5-6, trigger day, day of oocyte pick up (OPU), and trigger day + 7 days in the Control and Study cycles. Follicular fluid was collected from the first aspirated follicle on both sides during OPU in both cycles. Main results and the role of chance Inhibin B serum levels were significantly lower on stimulation day 1 after hCG-priming, but no other significant differences in serum Inhibin B or androgen levels were seen. The concentrations of Inhibin B and androstenedione in the follicular fluid from the Study and Control cycle did not vary but testosterone was significantly lower in the Study cycle. A lower Inhibin B in the Study cycle corresponds with the antral follicles being significantly smaller after priming, and this probably led to a longer stimulation time in the Study cycle. This contradicts the theory that androgen priming causes more FSH receptors on developing (antral up to preovulatory) follicles. Instead, we hypothesize that androgen priming rescued some small antral follicles that would have otherwise undergone atresia by the end of the previous menstrual cycle. The mechanism of action was likely an increase in androgen levels and FSH receptor expression within these small follicles, however, not enough to elevate androgen levels in serum. We retrieved significantly more oocytes in the Study cycle and the production of estradiol per follicle ≥10 mm on trigger day was comparable in the Study and Control cycle, suggesting that the rescued follicles were competent in producing oocytes and steroid hormones. Limitations, reasons for caution The sample size was small, and androgen and Inhibin B levels were not the primary outcome. We have not demonstrated a higher androgen level or FSH receptor expression in small antral follicles following hCG-priming. Wider implications of the findings The results make us question the mechanism of action behind hCG-priming prior to IVF. It is important to design a study with retrieval of small antral follicles immediately after priming to investigate the proposed hypothesis and to confirm improved cycle outcomes i.e., more retrieved oocytes in a larger study population. Trial registration number NCT04643925

Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in women with cancer: A comparative study.

In women scheduled for cancer treatment, oocytes cryopreservation is a well-established procedure. Random start protocols have been a substantial improvement in this setting, allowing to prevent delay in the initiation of cancer treatments. However, there is still the need to optimize the regimen of ovarian stimulation, to make treatments more patient-friendly and to reduce costs. This retrospective study compares two periods (2019 and 2020), corresponding to two different ovarian stimulation regimens. In 2019, women were treated with corifollitropin, recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonists. Ovulation was triggered with GnRH agonists. In 2020, the policy changed, and women were treated with a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and dual trigger (GnRH agonist and low dose hCG) Continuous data are reported as median [Interquartile Range]. To overcome expected changes in baseline characteristics of the women, the primary outcome was the ratio between the number of mature oocytes retrieved and serum anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) in ng/ml. Overall, 124 women were selected, 46 in 2019 and 78 in 2020. The ratio between the number of mature oocytes retrieved and serum AMH in the first and second period was 4.0 [2.3-7.1] and 4.0 [2.7-6.8], respectively (p = 0.80). The number of scans was 3 [3-4] and 3 [2-3], respectively (p<0.001). The total costs of the drugs used for ovarian stimulation were 940 € [774-1,096 €] and 520 € [434-564 €], respectively (p<0.001). Random start PPOS with hMG and dual trigger represents an easy and affordable ovarian stimulation protocol for fertility preservation in women with cancer, showing similar efficacy and being more friendly and economical.

Eight weeks of androgen priming by daily low-dose hCG injections before ICSI treatment in women with low ovarian reserve.

Does 8 weeks of continuous low-dose hCG administration increase the proportion of antral follicles that reach the preovulatory state during ovarian stimulation (OS) in women with low ovarian reserve? The proportion of antral follicles (2-10 mm) that reached the preovulatory state did not increase. The administration of androgens prior to OS might upregulate FSH receptor (FSHR) expression on granulosa cells, making follicles more responsive to exogenous FSH stimulation during OS. LH and hCG stimulate the local follicular androgen synthesis in theca cells and may be used as an endogenous androgen priming method. Exogenous priming by testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) have been shown to increase the number of retrieved oocytes and live birth rate but the studies are small, and their use is associated with side effects. A prospective, paired, non-blinded single-center study including 20 women serving as their own controls conducted between January 2021 and July 2021 at The University Hospital Copenhagen Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Participants underwent two identical consecutive IVF/ICSI treatments, a Control cycle and a Study cycle, separated by ∼8 weeks (two menstrual cycles) of daily injections of 260 IU recombinant hCG (rhCG). A freeze-all strategy was applied in the Control cycle. Both IVF/ICSI cycles were performed in a fixed GnRH antagonist protocol using a daily dose of 300 IU recombinant FSH (rFSH) and GnRH antagonist 0.25 mg from stimulation days 5-6. Follicular output rate, defined as the number of follicles >16 mm on hCG trigger day divided by the antral follicle count (2-10 mm) at baseline, did not increase after 8 weeks of hCG priming (P = 0.8). The mean number of oocytes retrieved was significantly higher after the hCG priming being 4.7 (2.8) vs 3.2 (1.7) in the Study and Control cycle, respectively (P = 0.01). The duration of stimulation was longer in the Study versus the Control cycle (P = 0.05), despite the use of identical hCG trigger criterion and similar diameters of the three biggest follicles on hCG trigger day in the two cycles (P = 0.9). The sample size was small, and the number of oocytes retrieved was not the primary endpoint. Larger studies are needed to confirm this finding. Long-term, low-dose rhCG administration may increase the number of oocytes retrieved during IVF/ICSI in women with low ovarian reserve, but more research is needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. This study was funded by an unrestricted grant from Gedeon Richter. A.P. reports personal consulting fees from PregLem SA, Novo Nordisk A/S, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Gedeon Richter Nordics AB, Cryos International, and Merck A/S outside the submitted work and payment or honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter Nordics AB, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, Merck A/S, and Theramex and Organon & Co. Grants to the institution have been provided by Gedeon Richter Nordics AB, Ferring Pharmaceuticals A/S, and Merck A/S and receipt of equipment by the institution from Gedeon Richter Nordics AB is reported. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04643925.

Low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin supplementation initiated at the onset of ovarian stimulation can improve oocyte quality without impairing endometrial receptivity: Case series

Whether continuous low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) supplementation during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) can improve oocyte and embryo quality is still controversial in clinical practice. We report the first case series of inadvertent COH in luteal-phase stimulation in the presence of endogenous or exogenous low-dose hCG. Patients were diagnosed with infertility. The first two cases had inadvertent COH during preexisting pregnancy, and one of which produced more high-quality embryos (5 vs 1) in the presence of low hCG. Both cases had a live birth. The third case had 7 repeated failures of IVF, during which a total of 55 oocytes were obtained, but only 3 developed into transferable embryo. However, supplementation of 330 IU hCG per day from the onset of COH resulted in the recovery of one high-quality embryo and subsequent delivery of a healthy baby following fresh embryo transfer in eighth attemption. In conclude, supplementation with low-dose hCG from the onset of ovarian stimulation can improve oocyte quality without impairing endometrial receptivity.

Efficacy of low-dose hCG on FET cycle in patients with recurrent implantation failure.

To study patients' new treatment methods and mechanisms of repeated implantation failure. A retrospective study. In vitro fertilization (IVF) unit in a Three-A hospital. Ninety-three patients with repeated implantation failure in IVF and embryo transfer. the luteal phase support. According to whether human chorionic gonadotropin(HCG) was added, the two groups were divided into an observation group and a control group, and the clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared. Furthermore, 20 patients were selected for whole exome sequencing to investigate the mechanism. The observation group's clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate were significantly higher than those in the control group (P=0.004). Functional enrichment analysis showed that these genes were significantly enriched in embryo implantation or endometrial receptivity processes, such as microtubule-based movement, NABA CORE MATRISOME, superoxide anion generation, protein localization to vacuole, extracellular matrix organization, fertilization, microtubule-based transport, cell junction organization, microtubule cytoskeleton organization. Furthermore, variants detected in these pathway genes were missense mutations that affect the protein's biological activity but do not effectuate its inactivation. Adding HCG in the luteal phase might improve the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in RIF patients. The potential pathogenesis of RIF genetic level may be caused by microtubule-based movement, extracellular matrix organization, and the Superoxide Anion generation pathway.

Application of an Allosteric Agonist of the Luteinizing Hormone Receptor for Reducing the Effective Dose of Gonadotropin in the Treatment of Androgen Deficiency in Rats with Type 1 Diabetes

In type 1 diabetes mellitus, the impaired testosterone synthesis in the testes leads to androgen deficiency. The long-term application of high gonadotropin doses for its correction decreases the sensitivity of luteinizing hormone/human chorionic gonadotropin (LH/hCG) receptors in Leydig cells to the endogenous gonadotropins. The aim of this work was to study the effect of a 3-day treatment of male Wistar rats with streptozotocin type 1 diabetes with the 5-amino-N-tert-butyl-2-(methylsulfanyl)-4-(3-(nicotinamido) phenyl)thieno[2,3-d]pyrimidine-6-carboxamide allosteric LH/hCG receptor agonist (TP03, 15 mg/kg/day) on steroidogenic effects of a relatively low-dose hCG (10 IU/rat, single dose, s.c.). Pretreatment of diabetic rats with TP03 enhanced the stimulatory effect of hCG on testosterone levels, slightly modifying its effects on the expression of steroidogenic proteins (Star, Cyp11a1, Cyp17a1) and LH/hCG receptor (Lhr) genes. Thus, in type 1 diabetes, TP03 increases the steroidogenic effect of low-dose hCG, at the same time as maintaining its effect on the gene expression of LH/hCG receptor and steroidogenesis enzymes in the testes.

A PROSPECTIVE STUDY ON THE VALUE OF MONITORING EXOGENOUS SOURCED SERUM HUMAN CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN LEVELS DURING IVF STIMULATION: LESSONS LEARNED FROM 2,257 CYCLES

Adding an LH component to IVF stimulation has previously been reported to improve retrieval outcomes in certain populations, when compared to follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) alone. Consequently, IVF cycles routinely utilize human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) as a means of luteinizing hormone (LH) replacement throughout stimulation, either through use of human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) or low dose hCG (ldHCG). The influence of these medications is reflected in serum hCG levels. The aim of this study is to determine if serum hCG levels during the follicular phase of IVF stimulation are associated with improved embryologic outcomes.

Hormonal profile in early luteal phase after triggering ovulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in high-responder patients.

The major limitations associated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) triggering are inferior clinical outcomes in fresh embryo transfer cycles caused by luteal phase insufficiency following the GnRHa triggering. We included 153 high-risk patients in this study. In group I, the patients received gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger + 1,500 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) support on the oocyte pick-up (OPU) day; in group II, the patients had a dual trigger (GnRHa + 1,500 IU hCG); and in group III (control), 10,000 IU hCG trigger was prescribed for the final oocyte maturation. The levels of LH, estradiol, and progesterone were evaluated in serum on the stimulation starting day, day 6 of stimulation, on the day of the trigger administration, OPU day, days 3 and 5 post-OPU, and day 14 post-ET, as well as in follicular fluid. Progesterone concentration was significantly lower in group I on OPU+5 compared to the hCG group (I vs. III, р = 0.0065). Progesterone levels were significantly lower in group II in serum on OPU+5 compared to groups I and III (I vs. II, р = 0.0068; II vs. III, р = 1.76 × 108). The progesterone levels were significantly higher in follicular fluid in group III compared to the study groups (I vs. III, р = 0.002; II vs. III, p = 0.009). However, no significant differences in clinical outcomes were found between the groups. Then, we divided all women into pregnant and non-pregnant groups and found that estradiol (p = 0.00009) and progesterone (p = 0.000036) on the day of the pregnancy test were significantly higher in the pregnant women group. Also, progesterone on OPU day was significantly higher in the non-pregnant group (p = 0.033). Two cases of moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) late-onset occurred in group I (3.5%, 2/56), no case of moderate/severe OHSS late-onset in group II, and three cases of moderate late-onset in group III (5.7%, 3/53). The low-dose hCG supplementation improves the luteal phase insufficiency after GnRHa triggering, which is confirmed by the comparable pregnancy rates in fresh transfer cycles between the groups. However, low-dose hCG carries a similar risk of OHSS as the full dose of hCG in high-responder patients.

P-626 Eight weeks of androgen priming by low dose hCG before IVF/ICSI in women with low ovarian reserve

Abstract Study question Does eight weeks of low dose hCG priming improve the outcome of ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI in women with low ovarian reserve. Summary answer Significantly more oocytes were retrieved following eight weeks of low dose hCG priming, when compared to an identical IVF/ICSI treatment immediately before the priming period. What is known already Administration of androgens prior to ovarian stimulation for IVF might upregulate the FSH receptor level on granulosa cells making the follicles more responsive to exogenous FSH. LH and hCG stimulate the follicular androgen synthesis, acting through LH receptors on the theca cells, enabling their use as an intra-ovarian androgen priming method. Exogenous testosterone and DHEA priming have been shown to increase the number of retrieved oocytes and the live birth rate, but systemic androgen administration is associated with side effects. Long term ‘intra-ovarian’ priming with hCG without systemic effects in women with low ovarian reserve has not previously been investigated. Study design, size, duration A prospective, paired, non-blinded study including 20 women serving as their own controls conducted between January 2021 and July 2021 at The University Hospital Copenhagen Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Participants underwent two identical consecutive IVF/ICSI treatments, a Control cycle including elective freezing of all blastocysts and a Study cycle with fresh blastocyst transfer. The Control and Study cycle were separated by approximately eight weeks (two menstrual cycles) of androgen priming by daily injections of 260 IE hCG. Participants/materials, setting, methods Inclusion criteria were age 18-40 years, regular menstrual cycle 23-35 days and AMH &amp;lt;6.29 pmol/L. Control and Study IVF/ICSI cycles were performed in a fixed GnRH-antagonist protocol using a daily dose of 300 IU rFSH and GnRH antagonist 0.25 mg from stimulation day 5-6. Primary endpoint was the follicular output rate defined as the pre-ovulatory follicle count (&amp;gt;16 mm) on hCG trigger day divided by the antral follicle count (2-10 mm) on cycle day 2-3. Main results and the role of chance 20 women with a mean (SD) age of 36.8 (3.2) years and an AMH level of 3.7 (1.5) pmol/L were included and completed the study. The number of oocytes retrieved was significantly higher in the Study compared to Control Cycle: 4.7 (2.8) vs. 3.2 (1.7), (P = 0.007), and the number of blastocysts was 1.2 (1.6) vs. 0.6 (0.7) in the Study compared to Control cycle, (P = 0.11). The follicular output rate was 0.4 (0.4) in the Study cycle initiated immediately after eight weeks of hCG priming, which was similar to the follicular output rate of 0.38 (0.2) in the Control cycle performed just before initiating the priming period (P = 0.81). The number of follicles above 10 mm on trigger day was 7.3 (5.0) in the Study and 5.3 (2.9) in the Control cycle (P = 0.018). Although the duration of stimulation seemed longer in the Study compared to Control cycle, 10.1 (1.5) and 8.9 (2.7) days respectively (P = 0.05), the same trigger criterion was defined and used in the two cycles confirmed by a similar mean diameter of the two biggest follicles on trigger day: 18.5 (1.1) vs. 18.3 (1.1) mm in the Study and Control cycle, respectively (P = 0.91). Limitations, reasons for caution The sample size calculation was based on the follicular output rate, and the study was not powered to look at oocyte retrieval rates. Bigger studies are needed to confirm this finding. Wider implications of the findings Although no increase in the follicular output rate was demonstrated, significantly more oocytes were retrieved after eight weeks of hCG priming, which is an important finding in a population of women with low ovarian reserve. Benefits of long term low dose hCG priming must be confirmed in a larger study. Trial registration number NCT04643925

Effect of GnRH agonist alone or combined with different low-dose hCG on cumulative live birth rate for high responders in GnRH antagonist cycles: a retrospective study

BackgroundThere is insufficient evidence regarding the impact of dual trigger on oocyte maturity and reproductive outcomes in high responders. Thus, we aimed to explore the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger alone or combined with different low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) regimens on rates of oocyte maturation and cumulative live birth in high responders who underwent a freeze-all strategy in GnRH antagonist cycles.MethodsA total of 1343 cycles were divided into three groups according to different trigger protocols: group A received GnRHa 0.2 mg (n = 577), group B received GnRHa 0.2 mg and hCG 1000 IU (n = 403), and group C received GnRHa 0.2 mg and hCG 2000 IU (n = 363).ResultsThere were no significant differences in age, body mass index, and rates of oocyte maturation, fertilization, available embryo, and top-quality embryo among the groups. However, the incidence of moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was significantly different among the three groups (0% in group A, 1.49% in group B, and 1.38% in group C). For the first frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle, there were no significant differences in the number of transferred embryos and rates of implantation, clinical pregnancy, live birth, and early miscarriage among the three groups. Additionally, the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate and cumulative live birth rate were not significantly different among the three groups. Similarly, there were no significant differences in gestational age, birth weight, birth height, and the proportion of low birth weight among subgroups stratified by singleton or twin.ConclusionsGnRHa trigger combined with low-dose hCG (1000 IU or 2000 IU) did not improve oocyte maturity and embryo quality and was still associated with an increased risk of moderate to severe OHSS. Therefore, for high responders treated with the freeze-all strategy, the single GnRHa trigger is recommended for final oocyte maturation, which can prevent the occurrence of moderate to severe OHSS and obtain satisfactory pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in subsequent FET cycles.

Adding Low Dose hCG to rFSH in GnRH Antagonist ICSI Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Inhibition of luteinizing hormone (LH) by gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist may lead to suboptimal response during ovarian stimulation. In addition, several studies suggest that low level of LH is associated with lowered fertilization and implantation rate and increased early pregnancy loss rate. The aim of this study is to study the effect of adding low dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG - 200 IU), as an LH supplement, to recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) in a GnRH antagonist cycles in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) treatment. Sixty-three infertile women undergoing IVF were randomly divided into two groups. One group was stimulated with the conventional stimulation protocol (rFSH alone), while the second group received 200 IU hCG in addition to rFSH in the late follicular phase (hCG + rFSH). Both groups' results including pregnancy rate, total dose of rFSH required, duration of stimulation, endometrial thickness, oocytes and embryos characteristic, serum hormone levels (Testosterone, Estradiol, Progesterone, and LH) and level of epidermal growth factor (EGF) were compared. The results show that pregnancy rate among the group of women who received the low dose hCG was higher than those who did not receive hCG. However, this difference did not reach statistical significance. Furthermore, other cycle outcomes and hormonal values were comparable between the two stimulation protocols.

Adding Low Dose hCG to rFSH in GnRH Antagonist ICSI Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Adding Low Dose hCG to rFSH in GnRH Antagonist ICSI Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial

DOES GnRH AGONIST TRIGGER FOR HIGH RESPONDERS DURING IVF/ICSI CYCLES IMPROVE THE NUMBER OF GOOD-QUALITY EMBRYOS, THE INCIDENCE OF MODERATE-TO-SEVERE OHSS, AND PREGNANCY OUTCOME COMPARED TO GnRH-A PLUS LOW-DOSE HCG?

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness of GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) trigger (triptorelin) and dual trigger of triptorelin plus low-dose HCG in patients with high ovarian response during IVF/ICSI treatment.

P-777 Comparison of GnRH-a trigger and GnRH-a plus low-dose HCG trigger for high ovarian responders in IVF/ICSI: A retrospective study based on propensity score matching

Abstract Study question Does GnRH agonist trigger for high responders during IVF/ICSI cycles improve the number of good-quality embryos, the incidence of moderate-to-severe OHSS, and pregnancy outcome compared to GnRH-a plus low-dose HCG? Summary answer GnRH-a trigger alone can effectively reduce the incidence of moderate-to-severe OHSS in women with high ovarian responses without affecting embryo quality. What is known already Previous studies have shown conflicting results on the different trigger protocol in high responders in IVF/ICSI outcomes, and as for women with high ovarian response, there is little known about the effects of GnRH-a plus low-dose HCG versus GnRH-a alone on oocytes maturation, the rate of good quality embryos, the incidence of moderate-to-severe OHSS, and pregnancy outcome during IVF/ICSI cycles. Study design, size, duration A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with high ovarian response who received IVF/ICSI treatment with a flexible GnRH antagonist regimen, at the Center of Reproductive Medicine, Chengdu Jinjiang Hospital for Maternal and Child Health Care, from January 1 2017 to December 31 2018. Using 1:1 propensity score matching, 513 cases entered each group (a total of 1,026 females). Participants/materials, setting, methods The high responders were included and assigned to groups A (0.2 mg triptorelin) and B (0.2 mg triptorelin plus 2000 IU HCG) for final oocyte maturation. Their basic clinical characteristics, information about controlled ovarian stimulation cycle, embryologic data, and pregnancy outcome in FET were retrospectively compared. The main outcome measures of the study were the rate of good-quality embryos, the number of available embryos, the incidence of moderate-to-severe OHSS, and the cumulative live-birth rate. Main results and the role of chance Using 1:1 propensity score matching, 513 females were included in each group. No significant differences in baseline clinical data were found between the two groups, including age at diagnosis, spouse’s age, the duration of infertility, the infertility type, and the cause of infertility, BMI, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, and the antral follicle count (AFC) (p &amp;gt; 0.05). None significant differences were found in the total doses of gonadotropin (Gn), the duration of ovarian stimulation, serum P and LH levels on the trigger day, the number of oocytes retrieved, the rate of 2PN embryos, and the rate of good-quality embryos (p &amp;gt; 0.05). The serum E2 level on the trigger day in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (p &amp;lt; 0.001). Women in group A had a lower incidence rate of moderate-to-severe OHSS than individuals in group B (p &amp;lt; 0.001). There was a non-significant difference in the cumulative live-birth rate between the two groups (p &amp;gt; 0.05). Limitations, reasons for caution As this is a retrospective study that uses data initially collected for other purposes, limitations may exist in the selection, implementation, and measurement biases that cannot be avoided. However, our study underlies the need for further prospective, multi-center joint-controlled studies to validate these findings. Wider implications of the findings This study demonstrates that GnRH-a alone can reduce the incidence of moderate-to-severe OHSS without harming embyro quality in women with high ovarian response. These findings need further prospective validations in hyperresponsive populations by multi-center, large-sample, randomized controlled studies. Trial registration number N/A

P–777 Comparison of GnRH-a trigger and GnRH-a plus low-dose HCG trigger for high ovarian responders in IVF/ICSI: A retrospective study based on propensity score matching

Abstract Study question Does GnRH agonist trigger for high responders during IVF/ICSI cycles improve the number of good-quality embryos, the incidence of moderate-to-severe OHSS, and pregnancy outcome compared to GnRH-a plus low-dose HCG? Summary answer GnRH-a trigger alone can effectively reduce the incidence of moderate-to-severe OHSS in women with high ovarian responses without affecting embryo quality. What is known already Previous studies have shown conflicting results on the different trigger protocol in high responders in IVF/ICSI outcomes, and as for women with high ovarian response, there is little known about the effects of GnRH-a plus low-dose HCG versus GnRH-a alone on oocytes maturation, the rate of good quality embryos, the incidence of moderate-to-severe OHSS, and pregnancy outcome during IVF/ICSI cycles. Study design, size, duration A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with high ovarian response who received IVF/ICSI treatment with a flexible GnRH antagonist regimen, at the Center of Reproductive Medicine, Chengdu Jinjiang Hospital for Maternal and Child Health Care, from January 1 2017 to December 31 2018. Using 1:1 propensity score matching, 513 cases entered each group (a total of 1,026 females). Participants/materials, setting, methods The high responders were included and assigned to groups A (0.2 mg triptorelin) and B (0.2 mg triptorelin plus 2000 IU HCG) for final oocyte maturation. Their basic clinical characteristics, information about controlled ovarian stimulation cycle, embryologic data, and pregnancy outcome in FET were retrospectively compared. The main outcome measures of the study were the rate of good-quality embryos, the number of available embryos, the incidence of moderate-to-severe OHSS, and the cumulative live-birth rate. Main results and the role of chance Using 1:1 propensity score matching, 513 females were included in each group. No significant differences in baseline clinical data were found between the two groups, including age at diagnosis, spouse’s age, the duration of infertility, the infertility type, and the cause of infertility, BMI, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, and the antral follicle count (AFC) (p &amp;gt; 0.05). None significant differences were found in the total doses of gonadotropin (Gn), the duration of ovarian stimulation, serum P and LH levels on the trigger day, the number of oocytes retrieved, the rate of 2PN embryos, and the rate of good-quality embryos (p &amp;gt; 0.05). The serum E2 level on the trigger day in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (p &amp;lt; 0.001). Women in group A had a lower incidence rate of moderate-to-severe OHSS than individuals in group B (p &amp;lt; 0.001). There was a non-significant difference in the cumulative live-birth rate between the two groups (p &amp;gt; 0.05). Limitations, reasons for caution As this is a retrospective study that uses data initially collected for other purposes, limitations may exist in the selection, implementation, and measurement biases that cannot be avoided. However, our study underlies the need for further prospective, multi-center joint-controlled studies to validate these findings. Wider implications of the findings: This study demonstrates that GnRH-a alone can reduce the incidence of moderate-to-severe OHSS without harming embyro quality in women with high ovarian response. These findings need further prospective validations in hyperresponsive populations by multi-center, large-sample, randomized controlled studies. Trial registration number N/A