Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goal Research Articles

Quantifying the 'distance to LDC-goal' in patients at very high cardiovascular risk with hyperlipidaemia in Germany: a retrospective claims database analysis.

This study quantified the 'distance to LDL-C goal' in patients at very high cardiovascular risk with uncontrolled hyperlipidaemia. 'Distance to LDL-C goal' was defined as the percentage by which low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels needed to be reduced to achieve the LDL-C goals specified in the 2016 or 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines. This retrospective analysis using data from the IQVIA Disease Analyzer database included patients who were predominantly treated by a primary care physician, diabetologist or cardiologist between 2014 and 2018, with a diagnosis of hyperlipidaemia and an initial LDL-C measurement (index event) and one or more cardiovascular risk factors. The primary outcome was to assess the proportion of patients with uncontrolled hyperlipidaemia and to classify the 'distance to LDL-C goal' in these patients. Data from 32,963 patients were analysed (n = 27,159, n = 3873 and n = 1931 patients in the primary care physician, diabetology and cardiology cohorts, respectively). Most patients had uncontrolled LDL-C levels (⩾70 mg/dL; ⩾1.8 mmol/L) at index (91.0%, 86.4% and 94.0% of patients in the primary care physician, diabetology and cardiology cohorts, respectively). Analysis of the 'distance to LDL-C goal' indicated that approximately one-third of patients in each cohort required an LDL-C level reduction of up to 50% relative to index to achieve their LDL-C goal (35.8%, 43.7% and 28.4% of patients in the primary care physician, diabetology and cardiology cohorts, respectively). LDL-C control was not achieved at 36 months post-index in most patients with uncontrolled LDL-C levels (86.8%, 81.7% and 90.2% of patients in the primary care physician, diabetology and cardiology cohorts, respectively). LDL-C levels were uncontrolled in most patients with hyperlipidaemia. Analysis of the 'distance to LDL-C goal' showed that most patients required a substantial LDL-C level reduction to achieve their LDL-C goal.

Evolocumab-Based LDL-C Management in High and Very High Cardiovascular Risk Patients in German Clinical Practice: The HEYMANS Study.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is among the most important modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease. In very high-risk patients, the European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines recommend attaining LDL-C < 55mg/dL. In the German cohort of the observational HEYMANS study, we aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and LDL-C control among patients initiating evolocumab. Data was collected between 09/2016 and 05/2021 for ≤ 6months before (retrospectively) and ≤ 30months after evolocumab initiation (prospectively). Patient characteristics, lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), lipid values, evolocumab use, and safety were collected. Of 380 enrolled patients, 93% received evolocumab in secondary prevention and 69% had a history of statin intolerance. At study baseline, 49% did not receive any statins and LDL-C was very high (145mg/dL). Use of evolocumab decreased LDL-C by a median of 53% within 3months and remained stable thereafter, despite mainly unchanged background LLT. Overall, 59% attained an LDL-C level < 55mg/dL (69% with, 49% without LLT). Persistence to evolocumab was 90.6% in months 1-12 and 93.5% in months 13-30. Adverse drug reactions were reported in 8% of patients. Data from the German HEYMANS cohort corroborate previous reports on evolocumab effectiveness and safety in clinical practice. Evolocumab initiation was associated with a rapid and sustained LDL-C reduction. Persistence with evolocumab was high. Our finding that patients receiving an evolocumab/LLT combination are more likely to attain the LDL-C goal than those receiving evolocumab alone corroborates previous data showing the importance of using highly intensive therapy. Graphical abstract available for this article. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02770131 (registration date 27 April 2016).

First Report of Inclisiran Utilization for Hypercholesterolemia Treatment in Real-world Clinical Settings in a Middle East Population

Inclisiran is the first small interfering RNA-based treatment approved for reducing pro-atherogenic lipoproteins in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia or clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, who require additional lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). We report the first evaluation of the effects of inclisiran in a Middle East population. We conducted a retrospective review of patients initiating inclisiran treatment at an outpatient diabetology, endocrinology, and cardiology center between May 2021 and December 2022. All patients followed up for 90 days or more, or with at least 1 lipid determination post initiation were included. Participants were categorized into primary prevention (n = 57) and secondary prevention (n = 89) groups according to previous atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Inclisiran was initiated in 146 patients; mean (SD) age was 54.8 (12.12) years, 82 patients (56.2%) were male, 28 patients (19.2%) had received a diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia, 89 patients (61%) had received a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, and 35 patients (23.9%) had a statin intolerance. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 137 (90 to 193) days. At 90 days, median (interquartile range) reductions in serum LDL-C and triglycerides were -37.9% (-9.5% to -51.2%) and -12.0% (-9.8% to -40.5%), respectively, in primary prevention and -54.1% (-17.1% to -71.4%) and -15.3% (-14% to -38.8%), respectively, in secondary prevention (all, P < 0.001). LDL-C goals were attained in 110 patients (75.3%). Nonattainment of LDL-C goal was attributed to system effect in 26 patients (72.2%), biological effect in 5 patients (13.9%), and discontinuation of treatment in 5 patients (13.9%). Therapy was well tolerated. This study is the first from the Middle East and North Africa region that reported the real-world efficacy and safety profile of inclisiran in a mixed-risk population of patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and other non-familial hypercholesterolemia indications. Clinically meaningful and sustained reductions in pro-atherogenic lipids with good tolerability were observed after inclisiran initiation. Fewer AEs were reported in this predominantly Arabic population, consistent with previous safety reports for inclisiran. It is important to note that no patient stopped inclisiran treatment due to AEs. Strengths of our study included an optimal cohort, patient heterogeneity, and high retention. In addition, we were able to report mean robust effects of inclisiran and good medication tolerability, quite like randomized studies and open-label extension periods. Despite this, our study had some limitations, including selection bias due to the retrospective design and the absence of a comparative group.

Low-Density lipoprotein cholesterol goal achievement and associated factors among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Cross-sectional Study, 2023

BackgroundAchieving the recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal is vital for managing cardiovascular risk. However, research on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal achievement and associated factors in Sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in Ethiopia, is limited. While global rates vary from 18% to 73%, there is a need for further investigation in this region to better understand and address the factors influencing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment.The objective was to assess low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal achievement and associated factors among type 2 diabetes patients. MethodsInstitution based quantitative cross-sectional study design was conducted among type II diabetes patients at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Systematic random sampling technique was used to select patient records. Data was collected by using a structured and pretested checklist and some variables were also collected from the chart review, structured questionnaire and analyzed using Epi info version 7.2 and SPSS version 25. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to examine the association between variables. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95 % confidence intervals were calculated, and a p-value of ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant for associations between independent and outcome variables. ResultThe LDL goal achievement among type II diabetes patients is 58.9 %.Total triglyceride level (AOR = 0.19, 95 %CI, 0.12, 0.54, P= <0.0001), history of smoking (AOR = 0.198, 95 %CI, 1.06, 1.10, P < 0.0001), 40–65 years of age (AOR = 0.21, 95 %CI, 0.05, 0.87, P = 0.03), BMI (AOR = 0.19, 95 %CI, 0.12, 0.54, P= <0.0001)., were found to be statistically significant independent predictors for LDL Goal Achievement in type II Diabetes patients. ConclusionIn the current study, significant proportions of type II DM patients fail to attain acceptable levels of LDL cholesterol. Factors like total triglyceride levels, smoking history, older age, and increased BMI influenced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal achievement. Advanced in age, increase in BMI, smoking, and higher levels of triglyceride were determinants of LDL cholesterol goal achievement. Patient education on life style modification mainly cessation of smoking diet and exercise may be recommended to achieve the LDL cholesterol goal.

Adherence to Current Dyslipidemia Guideline in Patients Utilizing Statins According to Risk Groups and Gender Differences: The AIZANOI Study.

The aim of this study was to assess the adherence to the current European Society of Cardiology dyslipidemia guidelines, the ratio of reaching target values according to risk groups, and the reasons for not reaching LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) goals in patients on already statin therapy in a cardiology outpatient population. The AIZANOI study is a multi-center, cross-sectional observational study including conducted in 9 cardiology centers between August 1, 2021, and November 1, 2021. A total of 1225 patients (mean age 62 ± 11 years, 366 female) who were already on statin therapy for at least 3 months were included. More than half (58.2%) of the patients were using high-intensity statin regimens. Only 26.2% of patients had target LDL-C level according to their risk score. Despite 58.4% of very high-risk patients and 44.4% of high-risk patients have been using a high-intensity statin regimen, only 24.5% of very-high-risk patients and only 34.9% of high-risk patients have reached guideline-recommended LDL-C levels. Most prevalent reason for not using target dose statin was physician preference (physician inertia) (40.3%). The AIZANOI study showed that we achieved a target LDL-C level in only 26.2% of patients using statin therapy. Although 58.4% of patients with a very high SCORE risk and 44.4% of patients with a high SCORE risk were using a target dose statin regimen, we were only able to achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C levels in 24.5% and 34.9% of them, respectively, in cardiology outpatients clinics. Physician inertia is one of the major factors in non-adherence to guidelines. These findings highlight that combination therapy is needed in most of the patients.

Effectiveness of Lipid-lowering Therapy for the Secondary Prevention and Achievement of Therapeutic Goals in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases in Accordance with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2018 Guidelines on the Management of Blood Cholesterol

Introduction: According to the India Report 2020, Kerala had the highest prevalence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVDs). Dyslipidemia is a modifiable risk factor that can prevent secondary events. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2018 Guidelines for the management of blood cholesterol for secondary prevention of clinical ASCVD recommend high-intensity statins and moderate-intensity statin combination therapy for achieving target low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C). We conducted a study to evaluate the achievement of therapeutic goals in accordance with the guidelines in a tertiary care hospital in Kerala. Materials and Methods: Three hundred and twenty adult patients prescribed with high-intensity statin monotherapy (atorvastatin 40 mg, rosuvastatin 20 mg, and rosuvastatin 40 mg) or moderate-intensity statin combination therapy (atorvastatin 10 mg and fenofibrate 145 mg) for the secondary prevention of ASCVD event were included. Data were collected from the medical records and patient interviews. Achievement of the therapeutic goal of LDL-C ≤70 mg/dL in accordance with guidelines was evaluated and compared; the mean percentage change in LDL-C was at the baseline and after 3 months. Patients were counselled on lifestyle modifications and educated about hypolipidemic agents. Since we are aiming for secondary prevention, the patients were given appropriate counselling concerning their disease and medications they are on. Dietary lifestyle modifications were also taught. Results: One hundred and thirty-eight patients achieved the therapeutic goal, with atorvastatin 40 mg (89.37%) being the most prescribed drug, followed by rosuvastatin 20 mg (5.62%) while rosuvastatin 40 mg had a higher efficacy with mean LDL reduction 65.71 ± 15.93 at 3 months follow-up. Comparing the adherence scores before and after patient counseling, the P value was found to be &lt; 0.001, indicating it is significant. Conclusion: Lifestyle modifications and lipid-lowering therapy are crucial to tackle dyslipidemia. Poor achievement of therapeutic goals implies the need for adopting measures to improve adherence and health-related outcomes for patients with ASCVD.

Are We Using Ezetimibe As Much As We Should?

Lipid-lowering therapies, particularly non-statin regimens, are underutilized as ~2/3 of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD) are not optimally managed, and do not attain target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations, despite statin treatment. Statins have been the mainstay of hypolipidemic therapies; however, they are plagued by adverse effects, which have partly hindered their more widespread use. Ezetimibe is often the first added mode of treatment to attain LDL-C goals as it is efficacious and also allows the use of a smaller dose of statin, while the need for more expensive therapies is obviated. We herein provide a comprehensive review of the effects of ezetimibe in lipid lowering and reducing CV events and improving outcomes. Of the hypolipidemic therapies, oral ezetimibe, in contrast to newer agents, is the most convenient and/or affordable regimen to be utilized as mono- or combined therapy supported by data from CV outcomes studies attesting to its efficacy in reducing CVD risk and events. When combined with a statin, the statin dose could be lower, thus curtailing side-effects, while the hypolipidemic effect is enhanced (by ~20%) as the percentage of patients with target level LDL-C (<70 mg/dL) is higher with combined treatment versus a high-intensity statin. Ezetimibe could also serve as an alternative treatment in cases of statin intolerance. In conclusion, ezetimibe has an excellent safety/tolerability profile; it is the first added treatment to a statin that can attain LDL-C targets. In the combined therapy, the hypolipidemic effect is enhanced while the dose of statin could be lower, thus limiting the occurrence of side-effects. Ezetimibe could also serve as an alternative mode of treatment in cases of statin intolerance.

Lipid Management in Kidney Transplant Recipients Per KDIGO and American Heart Association Guidelines: A Single-Center Experience.

The 2013 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommends statin treatment for all adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), except those aged <30 years of age and without prior cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF), but does not specify on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) target levels. The 2018 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines addressed the management of hyperlipidemia in the general population based on an individualized approach of the CVRF with a specific on-treatment LDL target. To analyze dyslipidemia management according to the recommendations of the KDIGO and AHA guidelines. This retrospective study included all KTRs who underwent transplantation between January 2017 and May 2020 at King Abdulaziz Medical Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The rate of statins prescription in general, rate of statins prescription among KTRs per their CVRF, and rate of achieving the proposed LDL goals, as defined by the AHA, were analyzed. A total of 287 KTRs were included. Of the 214 (74.6%) patients aged ≥30 years, 80% received a statin. Statins were prescribed in 93% and 96% of KTRs with diabetes or coronary artery disease, respectively. In patients aged ≥30 years, LDL targets, per AHA guidelines, were achieved in 62% with a target of 2.6 mmol/l, and in 19% with a target of 1.8 mmol/l. Statin therapy resulted in non-significant changes in the mean LDL values from baseline to 12 months after transplantation (P = 0.607), even when only patients prescribed statin after transplantation were included (P = 0.34). By applying the KDIGO guidelines, a high rate of statin prescriptions was achieved among KTRs with multiple CVRF and KTRs in general. However, a significant proportion of these KTRs did not achieve the LDL targets proposed by the AHA guidelines, suggesting that higher-intensity statins would be required to achieve these targets.

Natural Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors: A Review.

PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) is an enzyme that helps to reduce cardiovascular events. This clinical result is attributable primarily to the crucial involvement of PCSK9 in regulating the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level. Because oral anti-PCSK9 medications have yet to be available, the benefits of this unique treatment approach have been diminished. Identifying naturally occurring PCSK9 inhibitors may lead to considerable progress in this regard. These inhibitors serve as a starting point for producing oral and effective components that could be used with statins to boost the proportion of patients who achieve their LDL-cholesterol goals. In this review, we have briefly summarised the recent information regarding natural components or extracts that have been shown to inhibit PCSK9 activity.

Sex-Related Differences in the Prevalence of Classical, Non-Classical Risk Factors and Management of the Chronic Coronary Syndrome

(1) Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains the leading cause of death in both sexes. The male sex is considered a classical atherosclerosis risk factor, whereas females should be protected by hormonal effects until menopause. Although there are known differences in the development, type, and prognosis of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) between both sexes, there are no differences in approach in the guidelines. (2) Methods: The sex-related differences in CAD risk factors, treatment, echocardiographic, and angiographic results were assessed among 3291 patients with CCS. (3) Results: Women were older and had a higher prevalence of hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and diabetes mellitus than men. Women were more often treated conservatively than men. There was no difference in the use of beta-blockers and statins among the sexes. The LDL cholesterol goal was less frequently reached by women. Women were treated less often with aspirin than men, but they were treated more often with angiotensin receptor blockers than men. The left ventricle ejection fraction was higher among females. The number of obstructed vessels was higher in men. (4) Conclusions: Women may be more exposed to the risk factors of CAD than men. Men are diagnosed with CAD earlier, and their prevention and therapy are more efficient.

Association of health information technology-driven multidisciplinary approaches with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target achievement in patients with an acute coronary syndrome

ObjectiveControlling of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a challenge. Health information technology (HIT) is increasingly being applied to close quality gaps in chronic illness care. The aim of this study was to perform a qualitative review of the association of implementing HIT on lipid management processes of care and LDL-C goal attainment in patients with ACS. MethodEligible patients with a discharge diagnosis of ACS from January 2018 to December 2021 at a tertiary medical center were retrospectively reviewed. An HIT system with a multidisciplinary approach including initiating high-intensity statin therapy, periodic laboratory follow-up, titration of lipid-lowering agents, patient education, patient-level and system-level interventions involving database monitoring and outreach by centralized care teams was introduced in October 2018. Electronical medical records including data on medications and laboratory findings at discharge and within 1 year were compared before and after implementing the HIT system. ResultsA total of 2001 ACS patients (average age 63 ± 12.7 years, 79.66 % men) were analyzed. The LDL-C < 70 mg/dL goal attainment rates (36.52 %, 53.57 %, 59.22 %, 62.18 % in 2018–2021) and medium serum LDL-C levels (80.5 mg/dL, 68 mg/dL, 65 mg/dL, 64 mg/dL in 2018–2021) significantly improved within 6 months (2018 as the reference, all p<0.001). The LDL-C attainment rate at 12 months also steadily increased (53.80 %, 61.82 %, 64.21 % in 2019–2021, p = 0.019). Most of the patients switched to a high-intensity statins regimen at discharge (0.57 %, 63.67 %, 72.41 %, 84.44 %, in 2018–2021, p<0.001 with 2018 as the reference), with low adverse event rates. The maintenance rates of high-intensity statin regimens at 12 months continued to improve (41.36 %, 49.04 %, 61.39 % in 2019–2021, p<0.001). ConclusionsEfforts to control LDL-C should be increased in ACS patients by initiating and intensifying statin treatment earlier. Our results confirmed that a team-based strategy with HIT improved LDL-C target achievement for most patients with ACS.

Clinical characteristics and treatment patterns in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with hypercholesterolemia: a retrospective analysis of a large US real-world database cohort

Objective Guidelines developed by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) recommend lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. This study described LLT utilization patterns and LDL-C goal achievement (to <70 mg/dL) among patients with ASCVD in the United States. Methods This retrospective study was conducted using Optum’s de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database (CDM). Patients with their first ASCVD diagnosis (index date) in the CDM database between July 1, 2015, and December 31, 2018, were followed for ≥12 months to assess LLT utilization patterns and change in LDL-C. LLTs included were statins and non-statin LLTs (ezetimibe, fibrates, and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors). Adherence was measured as the proportion of days covered (PDC), defined as the number of days with drug on-hand (or number of days exposed to drug) divided by the 12-month follow-up period. Patients with PDC ≥0.8 were considered adherent. Results Among the patients with ASCVD (N = 1,424,893) included in this study, only 621,978 (43.7%) had at least one LDL-C measurement at baseline (6 months prior to and 3 months after the index date). The mean age was 71.5 years, and almost half of the patients were female. Patients were followed for a mean (standard deviation [SD]) duration of 30.6 (11.4) months (median of 29.9 months). During the follow-up, about one-quarter of the patients did not receive any LLT. Among treated patients, 89.5% received statins and 10.5% received non-statin LLT. Less than half (47.6%) of the patients were adherent to the index treatment during the 12-month follow-up. Even in patients receiving combination therapy (statin + non-statin LLT), a sizable proportion (35.8%) showed an increase in LDL-C over the follow-up period. Conclusions This retrospective study highlighted limited LDL-C monitoring in patients with ASCVD, and unmet need in terms of suboptimal utilization of non-stain LLTs, limited adherence to LLTs, and inadequate lipid control after treatment (among those with LDL-C measurements during the follow-up period) need to be addressed to improve outcomes in this patient cohort.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Statin Monotherapy and Statin plus Ezetimibe Combination in a Real-World Setting.

The objective of this study was to conduct a comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of ezetimibe in combination with statins or statin monotherapy in patients with hypercholesterolemia in a real-world setting. It was a retrospective multicenter observational study conducted in Russia. We included patients who received statins or a combination of statins with ezetimibe for ≥3 months. The primary endpoint of this study was the frequency of achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal levels at the time of enrollment in the study (%). The full analysis set consisted of 1000 patients: 250 subjects in the statin monotherapy group and 750 subjects in the combination group. The groups did not differ in clinical, demographic, or laboratory variables, except for a higher prevalence of hypertension and higher baseline lipid values in the statin monotherapy group. During treatment, the LDL-C concentration decreased by 1.10 ± 1.04 mmol/L (change of -27.5 ± 28.5% from baseline) in the statin monotherapy group and by 1.55 ± 1.17 mmol/L (change of -38.2 ± 25.6% from baseline) in the combination therapy group, p < 0.001. The target LDL-C level was achieved in 22.4% of the patients in the monotherapy group compared with 28.8% of the patients in the combination therapy group, p = 0.049. In real-world clinical practice, statin/ezetimibe combination therapy demonstrated a more frequent achievement of target LDL-C levels compared with statin monotherapy. The addition of ezetimibe to statin therapy increased the probability of achieving LDL-C level goals by 29%.

Real vs perceived LDL cholesterol control in clinical practice in Spain: Which factors are related to real control?

Abstract Background/Introduction According to ESC Guidelines, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) reduction is essential for the control of dyslipidaemia. Frequently, the physicians’ perception of LDLc control in patients (pts) is higher than the actual control, potentially leading to a suboptimal management of these pts. Purpose To understand the impact of physicians’ perception on LDLc control using a multivariate analysis and identify other potential predictive factors in the management of pts with dyslipidaemia in Spain. Methods Cross-sectional and multicentre study that included 435 healthcare professionals (34% cardiologists, 28% General Practitioners [GPs], 24% internists, and 14% endocrinologists) from 145 healthcare areas in Spain. Qualitative and quantitative information related to the management of pts with dyslipidaemia in clinical practice was collected. Additionally, aggregated anonymized data of the last 10 pts with dyslipidaemia attended by each physician were collected. With these data, a multivariate analysis was performed to estimate the impact of different variables on real LDLc control, including: age, gender and speciality of the physician, category of prevention, presence of comorbidities, lipid-lowing therapy (LLT) used, and whether the physician accurately perceived the real LDLc control. Results 4,010 pts (8%, 13%, 16% and 61% with low, moderate, high, and very high CV risk) were included. Physicians’ perception was that 62% of the pts achieved LDLc goals, but in actual clinical practice only 31% of pts did (p&amp;lt;0.01) (Figure 1). In the multivariate analysis it was found that physicians’ age and gender had little to no effect on LDLc control of pts, while their speciality did: cardiologists were twice as likely to control patients with dyslipidaemia than GPs. Likewise, pts with comorbidities or on secondary prevention were statistically associated with lower chance of appropriate LDLc control. Regarding the treatment used, data showed that the proportion of pts achieving LDLc goals increased as higher potency LLT was used. Precisely, LLT was found to have an significant impact on LDLc control: when compared to low intensity statins, pts treated with the combination of statin + ezetimibe had twice as many chances of achieving LDLc goals, reaching up to almost 15 times more possibilities for pts using PCSK9i. Lastly, control perception also mattered, with physicians who accurately perceived the real control having a probability two times higher to control their pts than physicians with poor LDLc control perception. Conclusions In Spain, most pts with dyslipidemia do not achieve the recommended LDLc goals mainly because of an insufficient intensification of LLT. The multivariate analysis showed that both LLT intensity and physicians’ perception had a major effect on LDLc control. These data highlight the need to further intensify LLT and raise awareness among physicians of the importance of achieving LDLc targets.Perceived vs real LDLc control by riskMultivariate analysis results

Therapeutic gaps in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol management have narrowed over time but remain wide: a wide study of 40,141 acute coronary syndrome patients from 2016 to 2021

Abstract Background There are significant therapeutic gaps in ‘real-word’ low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) management in very-high risk patients. Understanding these gaps is important for developing strategies to bridge these gaps. Purpose We aimed to evaluate trends and identify therapeutic gaps in LDL-C management in very-high risk patients. Methods We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients admitted with a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to 16 public hospitals in between 2016 and 2021. Baseline and 12-month lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) including statins, ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor and LDL-C levels were recorded. We evaluated trends-over-time in percentage achievement of guideline Class I recommendations including (i) in-hospital initiation of high-intensity LLT; (ii) lipid-profile at follow-up post discharge; (iii) achieve at least 50% reduction in LDL-C from baseline with a goal of (iv) LDL-C &amp;lt;1.4 mmol/L. Results Of 40,141 ACS patients (mean age 71, male 66.5%), 61.2% were statin-naïve on admission. Baseline average LDL-C was 2.35 mmol/L (IQR 1.74 to 3.13 mmol/L). LLT prescription on discharge increased over time from 63.8% in 2016 to 96.2% in 2021. The use of high-intensity statins on discharge also increased over time from 24.7% to 53.7% but still suboptimal. The use of high-intensity statins increased significantly at 12-months (29.4% in 2016 and 59% in 2021) compared to on discharge (44.1% vs. 40.9% overall, p&amp;lt;0.001). The use of combination LLT was very low (1.3%-3.8%). Up to 22% of patients did not have repeated lipid profile after discharge. Of patients who had follow-up lipid profile, the median LDL-C was 1.74 mmol/L with a median LDL-C reduction of 29%. Only 27.5% reached the LDL-C goal of &amp;lt;1.4 mmol/L and 22.5% achieved at least 50% of LDL-C reduction. LDL-C reduction improved over time from 25.8% in 2016 to 31% in 2021, proportion of patients who reached LDL-C goal of &amp;lt;1.4 mmol/L improved over time from 20.8% in 2016 to 28.7% in 2021, and proportion of patients who achieved at least 50% of LDL-C reduction improved over time from 18.5% in 2016 to 24.6% in 2021, respectively. Conclusion Despite an increasing trend in the use of high-intensity statins and combination LLT over time, most patients did not reach guideline-recommended LDL-C target. Early up-titration of statin and addition of non-statin LLT may be required in the majority of patients.

Unrealized opportunities for cardiovascular risk reduction with optimized statin and ezetimibe in veterans with coronary artery disease

Abstract Background Many patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) do not achieve guideline-directed low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals (1,2). Purpose To quantify unrealized opportunities to improve clinical outcomes of Veterans with CAD through optimized oral lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) with statins and ezetimibe within the United States Veterans Affairs healthcare system. Methods Veterans with CAD by coronary angiography between 2015 and 2020 were identified, the observed LLT and LDL-C were described, and the observed rates of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization were determined. Potential reductions in these events with optimized statin alone or with ezetimibe were modelled based on expected further LDL-C reductions (3). Results The analysis cohort comprised 111,954 Veterans (59.7% statin-treated at baseline angiography) observed for median 3.4 (IQR 2.1-4.0) years. At 6 months, statin prescription increased to 68.7%, but high-intensity statin regimens were prescribed in only 52.9%, ezetimibe use was low (1.1%), and LDL-C remained ≥70 mg/dL in 52.1% of patients. At 4 years, observed incidences (95% CI) of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization were 21.6% (21.3-21.8), 5.0% (4.9-5.2), 2.2% (2.1-2.3), and 15.4% (15.2-15.7), respectively (Figure 1). With optimized statin, projected absolute reductions in these incidences were 1.3% (0.9-1.7), 0.8% (0.7-1.0), 0.2% (0.1-0.3), and 2.3% (2.0-2.7). With optimized statin and ezetimibe, projected absolute reductions were 1.8% (1.2-2.4), 1.1% (0.9-1.3), 0.3% (0.2-0.4) and 3.1% (2.6-3.6). Conclusions Suboptimal LLT was prevalent among Veterans with CAD. Meaningful improvements in their cardiovascular outcomes could be achieved with optimized statin alone. Despite lesser lipid-lowering efficacy of ezetimibe, its widespread use on a population level could contribute substantially to cardiovascular risk reduction from intensified oral LLT.Figure 1Figure 2

Atherogenic lipid profile in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Abstract Background Adverse atherogenic lipid profile is associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Objective To evaluate the control status of atherogenic lipid profile among ACS patients within 12 months after discharge. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data from the multi-center iHeart program. Twenty tertiary hospitals in China were included. Natural language processing technique was used to extract real-world data from electronic health records (EHRs). Patients with a diagnosis of ACS from January 2014 to December 2021 during index hospitalization and having at least one medical record after discharge within 12 months were enrolled. Measurements of total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), triglycerides (TGs), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) at baseline and follow-up were collected and analyzed. Remnant cholesterol (RC) was calculated as TC minus HDL-C minus LDL-C. The treatment goal of LDL-C was defined as &amp;lt;1.8 mmol/L according to the guideline. An even lower LDL-C goal of &amp;lt;1.4 mmol/L was recommended in specific patients at extremely high risk with concomitant diabetes or ischemic cerebral vascular diseases. Results Among the 3956 patients, the mean age was 72 (12) years, and 64.8% were men. Diabetes was common (22.7%). There were 1612 (40.7%) patients with unstable angina, 391(9.9%) patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 1146 (29.0%) patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and 807 (20.4%) patients with undetermined ACS category. At baseline, the mean values for TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, non-HDL-C, ApoB, and RC were 4.61 (1.26) mmol/L, 2.83 (0.98) mmol/L, 1.12 (0.30) mmol/L, 3.38 (0.75) mmol/L, 96 (34) mg/dL, and 0.65 (0.56) mmol/L, respectively. The median values for TGs and Lp(a) were 1.44 mmol/L [1.06, 2.00] and 27.22 mg/dL [12.34, 39.2], respectively. The rate of lipid-lowering treatment was 94.8% (statins 93.1%, PCSK9 inhibitors 0.4%). The levels of TC, TGs, LDL-C, HDL-C, non-HDL-C, and ApoB were significantly decreased (P &amp;lt; 0.001) within 12 months. Median Lp(a) was 19.52 mg/dL [8.73, 39.08] (P = 0.117). Mean RC was 0.69 (1.10) mmol/L (P &amp;lt; 0.001). Overall, the proportion of patients achieving the LDL-C level of &amp;lt;1.8 mmol/L at baseline increased from 13.42% to 36.6% during follow-up. In patients with concomitant diabetes or ischemic cerebral vascular diseases, the rate of LDL-C &amp;lt;1.4 mmol/L was 17.79% and 17.52%, respectively. Conclusion Only 1/3 of patients had LDL-C &amp;lt;1.8mmol/L within 12 months after ACS. Despite the high treatment rate of statins, Lp(a) level had no change beyond the reduction in LDL-C. Elevated remnant cholesterol may be a critical contributor to residual risk. Novel therapeutics targeting the whole atherogenic lipid profile will be warranted to improve cardiovascular outcomes.LDL-C control rate within 12 months

Low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol target attainment in high-risk patients with history of diabetes or major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event: an (un)expected gender bias

Abstract Background Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the cornerstone of cardiovascular disease prevention, especially after the occurrence of a major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE). Collection of epidemiological data is crucial for monitoring healthcare appropriateness and the fulfillment of guidelines recommendations. Purpose This analysis aimed to evaluate the proportion of high-risk patients who achieved LDL-C goal as suggested by the international guidelines by analyzing regional administrative data and to explore the predictors of therapeutic failure, with a focus on the role of gender. Methods By linking health administrative and laboratory data, we collected data from seven Local Health Districts on residents aged ≥45 years. Inclusion criteria were: 1) at least one LDL-C measurement in the year; 2) a history of MACCE (defined as myocardial infarction and/or stroke and/or revascularization of the coronary, carotid, or peripheral arteries) and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Cohorts were defined at 1st January 2019 and 1st January 2020. Lipid lowering therapy use (defined as ≥2 prescription fillings or ≥75% coverage of treatment days) over the past 6 months if LDL-C data were available or over the past year if no LDL-C data were available was monitored. The outcome was the number of patients with on-treatment LDL-C optimal levels, as defined by levels &amp;lt;55 mg/dl for patients with MACCE and &amp;lt;70 mg/dl for patients with T2DM without MACCE. Results A cohort of 174,200 individuals was analyzed (55% males). As regards subjects on lipid-lowering therapies, we found that female gender was associated with a significantly lower probability to have LDL-C levels at target (OR: 0.58±0.01; p&amp;lt;0.0001) in patients with MACCE with or without T2DM, in a model adjusted for age, district area, and the presence of cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities (renal failure, heart failure, atrial fibrillation). This result was confirmed also in the analysis conducted in subjects without lipid-lowering therapies (OR: 0.56±0.01; p&amp;lt;0.0001). No significant differences were documented by stratifying for the presence of clinical pathways aimed to the active call of the patients by clinicians ("Initiative Health"). Conclusions These results demonstrated that females have a significantly lower probability to reach LDL-C levels recommended targets. This datum is confirmed even in the absence of lipid-lowering therapies. These results call for action aimed to: 1) education for general population and for patients with MACCE with a specific target on females; 2) information for clinicians for the need of assessing adequate lipid-lowering therapy prescription and adherence irrespectively of gender; 3) organization of clinical pathways - from admission to recovery and follow-up - with a specific focus on secondary prevention target attainment.

Impact of team-based health information technology to improve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment after acute coronary syndrome hospital discharge: a single-center experience

Abstract Objectives The reduction in circulating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the primary aim of lipid-lowering therapies as a method of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk reduction. Although guidelines recommended strictly control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) below 70 mg/dL by high-intensity statin therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the LDL-C target goal is not often attained. Health information technology (HIT) with information integration, decision making algorithm, is being applied on chronic illness care. Purpose We aimed to perform a qualitative review of the impact of HIT interventions on lipid management and LDL-C goal attainment in patients after ACS hospital discharge. Method Consecutive ACS patients with dyslipidemia (LDL-C &amp;gt;100 mg/dL) at discharge between January 2018 and December 2021 in a tertiary medical center were retrospectively reviewed. The LDL-C &amp;lt;70 mg/dL is defined as target. The team-based approach quality improvement program that consisted of patient education and high-intensity statin initiation before discharge, outpatient clinics with periodic laboratory follow-up, titration of lipid-lowering agents, and system-level interventions that involve database monitoring and outreach by centralized care teams, was introduced in October 2018. Electronical medical records including the medications, laboratory data at discharge and within 1 year were compared, before and after initiation of HIT system. Result A total 2248 ACS patients were included. The LDL-C &amp;lt;70 mg/dL attainment rate (36.52%, 53.57%, 59.22%, 62.18% in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021) and medium serum LDL-C level (80.5 mg/dL, 68 mg/dL, 65 mg/dL, 64 mg/dL in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021) significantly improved within 6 months after initiation of the team-based integrated intervention with assisted by HIT (2018 as the reference, all p&amp;lt;0.001). The LDL-C goal attainment rate at 12-month kept increasing gradually (53.80%, 61.82%, 64.21%, in 2019, 2020, 2021, p= 0.019). Most of the population initiated with moderate-intensity statin in 2018 (76.24%, 20.92%, 10.95%, 6.41% in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021), then switched to a high-intensity statin after initiation of the program (0.57%, 63.67%, 72.41%, 84.44% in 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021) (2018 as the reference, all p&amp;lt;0.001), while the adverse event rates including hepatotoxicity and rhabdomyolysis remained similarly low. Conclusion Our results confirmed that multifaceted intervention with HIT assisted multidisciplinary approach could substantially improve LDL-C goal attainment in post-ACS patients. There was a direct relationship between high-intensity statins and LDL-C goal attainment, without significant increase of adverse events.LDL-C goal attainment rate and levelLower lipid treatment and adverse event

Guideline-directed low-density lipoprotein cholesterol management following acute ischemic stroke: findings from Clalit health services

Abstract Background Patients with ischemic stroke are at high risk for future cardiovascular events and should be treated intensively with lipid-modifying agents. Combination lipid-lowering therapies are often needed to achieve updated (2019) guideline-directed treatment goals. However, real-world data on intensification of lipid-lowering therapies and attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets after ischemic stroke are limited. Methods Data from a single national health care service on patients hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke between Jan. 2020 and Feb. 2022. Included were 3027 patients surviving ≥1-year post-stroke, with documented LDL-C levels and lipid-lowering medications at 2 timepoints (&amp;lt;3 months and during 6-12 months post-discharge). Participants were classified according to preexisting stroke and/or coronary artery disease (CAD). Results LDL-C levels &amp;lt;70 mg/dL and &amp;lt;55 mg/dL were attained by 42.3% and 22.9% of patients early post-hospitalization, and in 49.5% and 27.1% during 6-12 months post-hospitalization, respectively. Attainment of guideline-recommended LDL-C goals was higher in those with preexisting cardiovascular disease. The use of combination lipid-lowering therapy (ezetimibe and/or PCSK9 inhibitor plus statin) increased between the 2 timepoints: from 2% to 3.2% in those without prior stroke and/or CAD, and from 5.4% to 7% in those with prior stroke and/or CAD. Conclusions Despite the advances in drug development and the availability of several mechanisms to lower cholesterol levels, the attainment of guideline-recommended LDL-C targets after acute ischemic stroke is suboptimal. Intensification of treatment with combination lipid-lowering therapies 6-12 months following hospitalization is uncommonly performed in clinical practice, even in those with preexisting cardiovascular disease.