Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goal Achievement Research Articles

Achievement Rates for Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goals in Patients at High Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in a Real-World Setting in Japan.

The study aimed to investigate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement rates in patients receiving LDL-C-lowering therapy using recent real-world data, following the 2017 revision of the Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases (JAS GL2017). Patients with documented LDL-C test results were extracted from the Medical Data Vision claims database between July 2018 and June 2021 and divided into three groups according to JAS GL2017: primary prevention high risk (Group I, LDL-C goal ＜120 mg/dL), secondary prevention (Group II, LDL-C goal ＜100 mg/dL), and secondary prevention high risk (Group III, LDL-C goal ＜70 mg/dL). The mean LDL-C value was 108.7 mg/dL (n=125,235), 94.4 mg/dL (n=57,910), and 90.6 mg/dL (n=33,850) in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Intensive statin monotherapy (pitavastatin, rosuvastatin, or atorvastatin) was the most frequently prescribed lipid-lowering treatment (21.6%, 30.8%, and 42.7% in Groups I, II, and III, respectively), followed by ezetimibe (2.5%, 7.1%, and 8.5% in Groups I, II, and III, respectively). LDL-C goals were achieved by 65.5%, 60.6%, and 25.4% of patients overall in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Achievement rates were 83.9%, 75.3%, and 29.5% in patients prescribed intensive statin monotherapy and 82.3%, 86.4%, and 46.4% in those prescribed statin and ezetimibe combinations in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. In Group III, the proportion of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia prescribed statin and ezetimibe combinations achieving LDL-C goals was low (32.5%). The proportion of patients achieving LDL-C goals for secondary prevention in the high-risk group remains low even with statin and ezetimibe combination therapy.

Associations of advanced liver fibrosis with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in type 2 diabetic patients according to obesity and metabolic goal achievement status.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), is frequently coexisted with obesity, poor glycemic, blood pressure (BP), and/or lipid control. We aimed to investigate the associations of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and its advanced fibrosis with HFpEF according to obesity, glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), BP, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement status in T2DM patients. A total of 2,418 T2DM patients who were hospitalized were cross-sectionally assessed. Liver fibrosis was evaluated by non-invasive biomarkers. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the independent and combined associations of fibrosis status and diabetic care goal attainments with HFpEF risk. Simple steatosis was not associated with HFpEF risk compared with patients without steatosis, while advanced liver fibrosis was found to have significantly higher odds for HFpEF risk (odds ratio,1.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-2.08). Advanced fibrosis in NAFLD was significantly associated with an increased risk of HFpEF, regardless of obesity status, HbA1c, BP, and LDL-C goal achievement status. P values for the interactions between fibrosis status and HbA1c control status, fibrosis status and BP control status, fibrosis status and LDL-C control status, and fibrosis status and body mass index (BMI) status on HFpEF risk were 0.021, 0.13, 0.001, and 0.23, respectively. In patients with T2DM, advanced hepatic fibrosis was significantly associated with HFpEF risk, irrespective of obesity status, HbA1c, BP, and LDL-C goal attainment status. Further, HbA1c and LDL-C goal attainment status modified this association.

Tafolecimab: First Approval.

Tafolecimab (SINTBILO®), a subcutaneously administered anti-proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 enzyme(PCSK9) monoclonal antibody, is being developed by Innovent for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and mixed hyperlipidemia. Tafolecimab was approved in August 2023 in China as an adjunct to diet, in combination with a statin or statin with other low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering therapies, for the treatment of adults with primary hyperlipidemia [including heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) and non-familial hypercholesterolemia (non-FH)] and mixed dyslipidemia who have failed to achieve LDL-C goals despite moderate or higher doses of statins, to reduce LDL-C, total cholesterol (TC), and apolipoprotein B (ApoB) levels. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of tafolecimab leading to this first approval for the treatment of adults with primary hyperlipidemia and mixed dyslipidemia.

Real-World Insights into Evolocumab Use in Patients with Hyperlipidemia Across Five Countries: Analysis from the ZERBINI Study.

This study characterizes patients receiving evolocumab in clinical practice and assesses treatment effectiveness, safety and persistence outcomes across five countries. This retrospective and prospective observational study enrolled patients initiated on evolocumab during August 2017 to July 2019 at 49 sites across Canada, Mexico, Colombia, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Medical records data were extracted within 6months prior to (baseline) and every 3months for 12months post evolocumab initiation and reported as available. A total of 578 patients were enrolled (40.1% female, median age 60 [interquartile range (IQR) 51-68] years); 83.7% had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and/or familial hypercholesterolemia. Median low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) at baseline was 3.4 (IQR 2.7-4.2) mmol/L (131.5 [IQR 104.4-162.4] mg/dL), with 75.6% of patients receiving a statin (59.2% high intensity). Compared to baseline, the median lowest LDL-C was reduced by 70.2% and remained stable over 12months of treatment. Guideline-recommended LDL-C thresholds < 1.8, < 1.4 and < 1.0mmol/L (< 70, < 55 and < 40mg/dL) were achieved by 75.3%, 63.6% and 47.4% of patients. LDL-C outcomes were consistent across high- and very high-risk patients. Background lipid-lowering therapy remained relatively stable. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported, and persistence to evolocumab was 90.2% at 12months. These findings provide real-world evidence that evolocumab use is in accordance with its international guideline-recommended place in dyslipidemia therapy, as well as confirmation of its effectiveness and safety in a heterogeneous population. Evolocumab can address a healthcare gap in the management of dyslipidemia by increasing the proportion of patients achieving LDL-C goals recommended to lower cardiovascular risk.

Efficacy and Safety of Single-Pill Combination of Rosuvastatin and Ezetimibe in Chinese Patients with Primary Hypercholesterolemia Inadequately Controlled by Statin Treatment (ROZEL): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double Dummy, Active-Controlled Phase 3 Clinical Trial.

Many patients with primary hypercholesterolemia do not achieve their plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals with statin alone under a recommended dose of statin (e.g., 10 mg rosuvastatin) in China. The objective of this phase III study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new single-pill combination (SPC) of rosuvastatin 10 mg/ezetimibe 10 mg (R10/E10) in this population. This was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled study in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia inadequately controlled with statin alone. The participants were randomized 1:1 to receive SPC R10/E10 or R10. The primary objective was to demonstrate the superiority of SPC R10/E10 vs. R10 in reducing the LDL-C levels after 8 weeks. This trial randomized 305 participants to SPC R10/E10 (n = 153) and R10 (n = 152). The superiority of SPC R10/E10 over R10 was demonstrated with the least square (LS) mean difference of percent change in LDL-C from baseline to week 8: - 13.85% (95% confidence interval [CI] - 20.15% to - 7.56%, P < 0.0001). The proportion of participants who achieved the LDL-C target (< 2.6 mmol/l) at week 8 was larger with SPC R10/E10 (n = 80, 54.1%) than with R10 (n = 42, 29.2%) (Odds ratio = 2.80, 95% CI 1.70 to 4.61, P < 0.0001). No unexpected safety findings were reported. The results suggest that SPC R10/E10 improve LDL-C reduction and goal achievement in Chinese patients with primary hypercholesterolemia not adequately controlled on statin therapy, without new safety findings. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04669041).

Optimal implementation of the 2019 ESC/EAS dyslipidaemia guidelines in patients with and without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease across Europe: a simulation based on the DA VINCI study.

The impact of the stepwise implementation of the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) treatment algorithm on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment was simulated in patients from the DA VINCI study. Monte Carlo simulation was used to evaluate treatment optimisation scenarios, based on a patient's risk category: statin intensification (step 1), addition of ezetimibe (step 2), and addition of a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor (step 3). Residual cardiovascular risk and predicted relative and absolute risk reduction (RRR and ARR) in cardiovascular events were assessed. In DA VINCI, 2482 patients did not achieve their 2019 ESC/EAS LDL-C goals and were included in the simulation. In patients without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (n=962), 27.0% (n=259) and 57.0% (n=548) are likely to achieve their LDL-C goals at step 1 and step 2, respectively. Of those at very high risk without ASCVD (n=74), 88.1% (n=65) are likely to achieve their LDL-C goals at step 3. In patients with ASCVD (n=1520), 12.0% (n=183), 42.1% (n=641) and 93.2% (n=1416) are likely to achieve their LDL-C goals at steps 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In patients with and without ASCVD, treatment optimisation may result in mean simulated RRR of 24.0% and 17.7%, respectively, and ARR of 8.1% and 2.6%, respectively. Most patients at high cardiovascular risk are unlikely to achieve LDL-C goals through statin optimisation and ezetimibe, and will require a PCSK9 inhibitor, leading to greater reduction in cardiovascular risk. Amgen.

Regional differences in physicians' behavior and factors influencing the intensity of PCSK9 inhibitor therapy with alirocumab: a subanalysis of the ODYSSEY APPRISE study.

Despite better accessibility of the effective lipid-lowering therapies, only about 20% of patients at very high cardiovascular risk achieve the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. There is a large disparity between European countries with worse results observed for the Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) patients. One of the main reasons for this ineffectiveness is therapeutic inertia related to the limited access to appropriate therapy and suitable dosage intensity. Thus, we aimed to compare the differences in physicians' therapeutic decisions on alirocumab dose selection, and factors affecting these in CEE countries vs. other countries included in the ODYSSEY APPRISE study. ODYSSEY APPRISE was a prospective, single-arm, phase 3b open-label (≥12 weeks to ≤30 months) study with alirocumab. Patients received 75 or 150 mg of alirocumab every 2 weeks, with dose adjustment during the study based on physician's judgment. The CEE group in the study included Czechia, Greece, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia, which we compared with the other nine European countries (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Switzerland) plus Canada. A total of 921 patients on alirocumab were involved [modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis], including 114 (12.4%) subjects from CEE countries. Therapy in CEE vs. other countries was numerically more frequently started with lower alirocumab dose (75 mg) at the first visit (74.6 vs. 68%, p = 0.16). Since week 36, the higher dose was predominantly used in CEE patients (150 mg dose in 51.6% patients), which was maintained by the end of the study. Altogether, alirocumab dose was significantly more often increased by CEE physicians (54.1 vs. 39.9%, p = 0.013). Therefore, more patients achieved LDL-C goal at the end of the study (<55 mg/dl/1.4 mmol/L and 50% reduction of LDL-C: 32.5% vs. 28.8%). The only factor significantly influencing the decision on dose of alirocumab was LDL-C level for both countries' groups (CEE: 199.2 vs. 175.3 mg/dl; p = 0.019; other: 205.9 vs. 171.6 mg/dl; p < 0.001, for 150 and 75 mg of alirocumab, respectively) which was also confirmed in multivariable analysis (OR = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.07-1.13). Despite larger unmet needs and regional disparities in LDL-C targets achievement in CEE countries, more physicians in this region tend to use the higher dose of alirocumab, they are more prone to increase the dose, which is associated with a higher proportion of patients reaching LDL-C goals. The only factor that significantly influences decision whether to increase or decrease the dose of alirocumab is LDL-C level.

Trends in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal achievement and changes in lipid-lowering therapy after incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Danish cohort study.

We aimed to investigate trends in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement (LDL-C<1.8 mmol/L, equivalent to 70 mg/dL), initiation of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) and changes in LLT intensity in individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) at very high risk of recurrent cardiovascular disease. A cohort study design was used including individuals with incident ASCVD and LDL-C≥1.8 mmol/L in 2010-2015. Data were obtained from national, population-based registers (patient, prescription, income, and laboratory). We included 11,997 individuals. Acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke and stable angina pectoris accounted for 79.6% of the qualifying ASCVD events. At inclusion, 37.2% were in LLT. Mean LDL-C before or during ASCVD hospitalization was 3.1 mmol/L (120 mg/dL). LDL-C goal achievement increased within the first two years after inclusion from 40.5% to 50.6%. LLT initiation within the first 90 days increased from 48.6% to 56.0%. Initiation of intensive LLT increased from 9.6% to 32.8%. The largest change in LLT intensity was seen in the period 180 days before to 90 days after discharge with 2.2% in 2010 to 12.1% in 2015. LDL-C goal achievement within the first 2 years after inclusion increased from 40.5% in 2010 to 50.6% in 2015. LLT initiation within the first year after inclusion increased, especially for intensive LLT, although only one third initiated intensive LLT in 2015. Despite trends show improvements in LDL-C goal achievement, 49.4% of individuals at very high risk of a CV event did not achieve the LDL-C goal within 2 years after ASCVD hospitalization.

Differences in treatment strategies for LDL-cholesterol reduction in a university lipid clinic vs. standard care apart from the use of PCSK9 inhibitors

Lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) is insufficient despite clear guideline recommendations. Lipid clinics have specialized in patients with dyslipidemia, but the magnitude and reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in lipid clinics has not yet been studied in depth. To assess LDL-C reduction in very high-risk CVD patients achieved in a lipid clinic through different forms of LLT in comparison to standard care without the initiation of PSCK9 inhibitors. Data from 96 lipid clinic patients were analyzed retrospectively and compared to 84 standard care patients. Very high-risk patients were defined according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Different combinations of LLT focusing on statins and ezetimibe were investigated. Achievement of LDL-C treatment goals according to ESC guidelines as well as LDL-C reduction were assessed. Baseline and follow-up data of 180 very high-risk CVD patients (mean age 67.7 (±9.8) y; 60.6% male) were used. Achievement of the LDL-C goal in lipid clinic patients increased significantly from 14.6% at baseline to 41.7% at the latest visit (p<0.001) while standard care patients improved from 21.4% to 33.3% (p=0.08). The largest relative LDL-C reduction via an adjustment in LLT was achieved by initiation of high-intensity statins (50.8 ± 4.9%, n=5, p < 0.05). Treatment in a lipid clinic leads to a superior LDL-C goal achievement in very high-risk CVD patients as compared to standard care with the highest reduction under LLT with high-intensity statins and ezetimibe. Referral algorithms have to be established for high-risk patients.

Sex differences in LDL-C control in a primary care population: The PORTRAIT-DYS study

Background and aimsCardiovascular (CV) diseases show clear differences in clinical manifestation and treatment outcomes between men and women. To reduce sex disparities in achieving lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) goals, a sex-focused assessment is essential and more studies are needed to bring new evidence to clinicians. This study aims to assess the role of sex in attaining low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals, after correction for age, CV risk category, LLT intensity, and presence of mental health disorder and social deprivation. MethodsA retrospective cohort analysis of patients aged 40–85, followed in 1 hospital and 14 primary care centers in Portugal, using electronic health records from 1/1/2012 to 31/12/2020, was performed. The analysis considered an episode-based design, where exposure consists of any time when LLT was started or intensity changed. The likelihood of reaching the LDL-C goal according to contemporary ESC/EAS guidelines was modeled using multivariate Cox regression. LDL-C goal achievement at 180 days was defined as the outcome. The analysis was repeated at 30-day follow-up intervals up to 360 days, and also stratified by CV risk category. ResultsWe identified 40,032 exposure episodes (LLT initiation or intensity change) in 30,323 distinct patients. Male sex, older age, lower CV risk and increasing LLT intensity were associated with improved LDL-C control. Women were 22% less likely to reach the LDL-C goal than men (HR = 0.78, 95% CI:0.73, 0.82) independently of covariates. ConclusionsWomen have a lower likelihood of attaining LDL-C goals than men after adjustment for LLT intensity, age, CV risk category, presence of mental health disorder and social deprivation. This finding underscores the need for further investigation and tailoring of LLT management strategies in women.

Lipid management in ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in China: result from China National Stroke Registry III

ObjectivesThe aims of the study were to assess the management of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and the goal achievement, as well as to investigate the association between baseline LDL-C level,...

A Practical Statin Recommendation System Based on Real-World Data to Improve LDL-C Management in Secondary Prevention.

Statins are considered the cornerstone of secondary prevention in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, many patients fail to achieve the guide-recommended goal of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) after statin monotherapy, leading to a high residual risk of cardiovascular events. Owing to individual differences in statin therapy, it is possible first to consider changing the type of statin before adding nonstatin medications in certain patients to improve LDL-C management. We developed and evaluated a statin recommendation system using real-world data. Ensemble learning was performed to develop the recommendation system that integrated the output results of support vector machines (SVM) and the similarity of patients. Model performance was assessed to investigate whether treatment according to the recommended model would increase the proportion of patients with the primary end point. Finally, a total of 3510 patients were enrolled in the development and validation of the recommender system. Of them, 1240 patients received atorvastatin (35.3%), 1714 patients received rosuvastatin (48.8%), and 556 patients received pitavastatin (15.8%). The statin recommendation system could significantly improve LDL-C target rate achievement in the recommended treatment group compared with the nonrecommended treatment group in the validation set (50.8% vs. 31.5%, P < 0.001). This study demonstrated that the statin recommendation system could significantly improve the achievement of LDL-C goals in ASCVD patients, providing a new approach to improve LDL-C management.

The effect of the 2019 ESC/EAS dyslipidaemia guidelines on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal achievement in patients with acute coronary syndromes: The ACS EuroPath IV project

AimsTo evaluate the effect of the ESC/EAS 2019 dyslipidaemia guidelines on patient management of lipid-lowering therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), through a survey designed to compare post-ACS patient management in 2022 with that in 2018. MethodsOnline questionnaires focused on lipid profile and medications were used to gather data from 2650 ACS patients in 6 European countries, treated between March–June 2022 (ACS EuroPath IV survey). These data were compared with data collected from 2650 patients who participated in the ACS EuroPath I survey (conducted in 2018). ResultsLipid testing was performed in 90% of patients and was done sooner after admission in 2022 versus 2018 (mean 1.4 vs 1.7 days). Increased testing for non-HDL-C, lipoprotein(a), and ApoB was observed over time. At discharge, most patients (≥90%) were receiving lipid-lowering therapy. Prescribing patterns differed, with a higher proportion of patients receiving statin plus ezetimibe combination therapy in 2022 versus 2018 (34% vs 13%). LDL-C levels were lower in 2022 versus 2018 at admission and at 1st, 2nd and 3rd post-discharge follow-up points. More patients achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals in 2022 versus 2018 at the first follow-up (average 14 vs 16 weeks since discharge; <70 mg/dL [1.8 mmol/L]: 34% vs 20%; <55 mg/dL [1.4 mmol/L]: 18% vs 10%) and at subsequent follow-up points. ConclusionLDL-C goal achievement has improved since the release of the 2019 guidelines, but lipid management in post-ACS patients remains suboptimal.

Complementary role of evinacumab in combination with lipoprotein apheresis in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

Patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) have severe hypercholesterolemia from birth and if untreated may experience very early onset of coronary artery disease in childhood or young adulthood with an aggressive course resulting in early death. Early initiation of aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering is the mainstay of treatment, which requires the use of a multidrug treatment regimen, often in combination with lipoprotein apheresis, but LDL-C goal achievement is frequently unattainable due to the severity of baseline hypercholesterolemia and hyporesponsiveness to many LDL-C-lowering medications. Evinacumab, a monoclonal antibody that sequesters angiopoietin-like 3 protein and lowers LDL-C by an average of 49% in patients with homozygous FH, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in February 2021 and is a major advance in treatment of these high-risk patients. In this report, we describe the complementary role of evinacumab in combination with lipoprotein apheresis in two patients with homozygous FH.

Persistence with long-term PCSK9 inhibitor treatment and its effectiveness in familial hypercholesterolaemia: data from the SAFEHEART study.

Most heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) patients require intensive lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) including PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9is) to reach current low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. Persistence with chronic treatment is important to reduce the burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. We analysed persistence, efficacy, and impact on quality of life (QoL) of PCSK9i in FH patients in clinical practice setting. Spanish Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Cohort Study (SAFEHEART) is an open, prospective study in genetically defined FH patients in Spain. Patients ≥18 years of age (n = 696, 46% females) on stable LLT treated with PCSK9i were analysed. Median LDL-C at starting PCSK9i was 145 mg/dL [interquartile range (IQR), 123-177], 3.8 mmol/L (IQR 3.2-4.6). After a median follow up of 3.7 years (IQR 2.3-4.8), 27 patients (4%) discontinued PCSK9i treatment: 5 temporarily (0.7%) and 22 permanently (3.2%). Persistence with PCSK9i was 96.1% in the whole period. Median LDL-C levels and % LDL-C reduction attained after 1 year of treatment and in the last follow-up visit were 63 mg/dL (IQR 43-88), 1.6 mmol/L (IQR 1.1-2.23); 61 mg/dL (IQR 44-82), 1.6 mmol/L (IQR 1.1-2.1); 57.6% (IQR 39.5-69); and 58% (IQR 44-68), respectively. 2016 and 2019 ESC/EAS LDL-C goals were attained by 77 and 48% of patients, respectively, at the last follow-up visit (P < 0.001). Mean QoL score increased slightly in the first year and remained stable. Long-term persistence with PCSK9i in FH patients is very high, with a good QoL. Effectiveness in LDL-C reduction and LDL-C goal achievement dramatically improved with PCSK9i in this high-risk population in clinical practice setting. ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02693548.

European Physician Survey Characterizing the Clinical Pathway and Treatment Patterns of Patients Post-Myocardial Infarction.

The 2019 European Society of Cardiology and European Atherosclerosis Society (2019 ESC/EAS) guidelines stress the importance of managing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) after myocardial infarction (MI) to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. Information on guideline implementation is limited. The aim of this survey was to describe current clinical practice regarding LDL-C management in the first year post-MI across Europe, improving understanding of the role of ESC/EAS guidelines on clinical practice. A qualitative web-based cross-sectional physician survey about the patient pathway and LDL-C management post-MI was conducted in 360 physicians from France, Italy, Germany, The Netherlands, Spain, and the UK (n = 60/country) between December 2019 and June 2020. Secondary and primary care physicians (SCPs/PCPs) described their experiences treating patients post-MI over the preceding 2months. Physicians reported that on average 90.7% of patients not prescribed lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) before an MI initiated LLT as inpatients; for patients already taking LLT, treatment was intensified for 64.7% of inpatients post-MI. SCPs reported prescribing higher-intensity statins and/or ezetimibe for between 72.3% (Italy) and 88.6% (UK) of patients post-MI. More than 80.0% of SCPs and 51.2% of PCPs stated that they would initiate a change in LLT immediately if patients did not achieve their LDL-C treatment goal by 12weeks post-MI; 82.0% of SCPs and 55.1% of PCPs reported referring to 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for management of patients post-MI. Barriers to initiating PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9is) included prior prescription of a maximally tolerated dose of statin (49.4%) and/or ezetimibe (38.9%), requirement to reach threshold LDL-C levels (44.9%), and pre-authorization requirements (30.4%). Differences in clinical practice post-MI were reported across the countries surveyed, including divergence between 2019 ESC/EAS and local guidelines. Increased use of innovative medicines to achieve LDL-C goals should reduce risk of subsequent cardiovascular events in very high-risk patients post-MI.

LDL-C goal achievement and lipid-lowering therapy in patients by atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease subtype: the SANTORINI study

Abstract Background In the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines, documented ASCVD is a criterion for patients being categorised as at very high cardiovascular (CV) risk, and stringent low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reductions of ≥50% plus a goal of &amp;lt;1.4 mmol/L are recommended. Intensive lipid lowering therapy (LLT) is therefore key to reducing the risk of future CV events. Purpose To describe patient characteristics, approaches to lipid management and LDL-C goal attainment at baseline in the subgroup of secondary prevention patients with a history of ASCVD enrolled in the SANTORINI study. Methods SANTORINI is a multinational observational study (NCT-04271280) evaluating the real-world use of LLT in adult patients with high- and very-high CV risk enrolled from primary and secondary care sites across Europe between March 2020 and February 2021. The ASCVD status of patients was defined based on medical records as either coronary (myocardial infarction; unstable angina; angina pectoris; coronary artery bypass graft surgery; percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; coronary artery disease [CAD]; CAD unequivocal on imaging), cerebral (stroke; transient ischaemic attack; cerebrovascular disease; cerebrovascular disease unequivocal on imaging; carotid artery disease), peripheral/other (peripheral arterial disease [PAD]; lower extremity artery disease; PAD unequivocal on imaging; retinal vascular disease; abdominal aortic aneurysm; renovascular disease) or polyvascular (≥1 ASCVD). Results Of the 9044 patients included in the analysis 6954 (76.9%) had a history of ASCVD. Baseline demographics and patient characteristics by type of ASCVD are shown in Table 1. The majority of patients were male (76.9%) and mean (SD) age was 66.1 (10.4) years. Mean (SD) LDL-C level was 2.29 (1.13) mmol/L and a total of 20.7% of patients achieved CV risk-based LDL-C goals. Fewer patients with cerebral ASCVD attained LDL-C goals (15.0%). Despite being at very-high CV risk, 21.4% of all patients had no documented LLT (up to 28.5% for the cerebral ASCVD group). The majority of patients (49.2%) received statin monotherapy, particularly moderate (21.8%) and high-intensity statins (24.9%). The peripheral/other ASCVD and cerebral ASCVD groups recorded the highest use of monotherapy across subgroups (≥57.8%), whereas any other LLT alone was consistently low, including ezetimibe (≤2.5%) and PCSK9i (≤2.0%). Overall, only 25.6% of patients received combination therapy (17.5% statin + ezetimibe; 4.7% PCSK9i + statin and/or ezetimibe; 3.4% other). Conclusion The SANTORINI baseline analysis shows that the majority of patients with ASCVD do not achieve their LDL-C goals. The underutilisation of combination therapy in this very high CV risk population highlights the need to move beyond high-intensity statin monotherapy and rather focus on combination therapies which achieve more intensive LDL-C reductions, thus improving LDL-C goal attainment. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment in Germany: Results from the DA VINCI study

Background and aimsCardiovascular mortality is high in Germany. For patients with high or very high cardiovascular risk, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines recommend intensive lipid lowering therapy (LLT). This study aimed to assess dyslipidaemia management and achievement of the ESC/EAS guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. MethodsThis European 18-country, cross-sectional, observational DA VINCI study (EUPAS22075) collected data during a single visit between June 2017 and November 2018 and included LLT in the preceding 12 months and the patients' most recent LDL-C measurement. Achievement of the risk-based 2016 and 2019 ESC/EAS LDL-C goals while receiving stabilized LLT was assessed. Data from the German cohort are presented here. ResultsSeven German sites enrolled a total of 421 primary and secondary prevention patients, 327 were receiving stabilized LLT at the time of LDL-C measurement, i.e. statin monotherapy of high (16%; n = 53), moderate (49%; n = 160) or low (7%; n = 24) intensity, ezetimibe combination (18%; n = 58), proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 antibody combination (3%; n = 9), and other LLT (7%; n = 23). The 2016 and 2019 risk-based LDL-C goals were attained by 46% (n = 149) and 28% (n = 92) of patients, respectively. ConclusionsThere is a large gap between ESC/EAS recommendations and LDL-C goal achievement in routine clinical practice in high and very high-risk patients in Germany. Low-to-moderate-intensity statin monotherapy was the most frequently used LLT; use of high-intensity statins and combination therapy was limited. In addition to optimizing statin intensity, combination with non-statin LLT may be needed in most of these patients.

Impact of a Population Genomic Screening Program on Health Behaviors Related to Familial Hypercholesterolemia Risk Reduction.

Background:Limited information is available regarding clinician and participant behaviors after disclosure of genomic risk variants for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) from a population genomic screening program.Methods:We conducted a retrospective cohort study of MyCode participants with an FH risk variant beginning 2 years before disclosure until January 16, 2019. We analyzed lipid-lowering prescriptions (clinician behavior), medication adherence (participant behavior), and LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol levels (health outcome impact) pre- and post-disclosure. Data were collected from electronic health records and claims.Results:The cohort included 96 participants of mean age 57 (22–90) years with median follow-up of 14 (range, 3–39) months. Most (90%) had a hypercholesterolemia diagnosis but no specific FH diagnosis before disclosure; 29% had an FH diagnosis post-disclosure. After disclosure, clinicians made 36 prescription changes in 38% of participants, mostly in participants who did not achieve LDL cholesterol goals pre-disclosure (81%). However, clinicians wrote prescriptions for fewer participants post-disclosure (71/96, 74.0%) compared with pre-disclosure (81/96, 84.4%); side effects were documented for most discontinued prescriptions (23/25, 92%). Among the 16 participants with claims data, medication adherence improved (proportion of days covered pre-disclosure of 70% [SD, 24.7%] to post-disclosure of 79.1% [SD, 27.3%]; P=0.05). Among the 52 (54%) participants with LDL cholesterol values both before and after disclosure, average LDL cholesterol decreased from 147 to 132 mg/dL (P=0.003).Conclusions:Despite disclosure of an FH risk variant, nonprescribing and nonadherence to lipid-lowering therapy remained high. However, when clinicians intensified medication regimens and participants adhered to medications, lipid levels decreased.

Achieving Lower LDL-C Levels After a Recent Myocardial Infarction Might Be Associated with Lower Healthcare Resource Use and Costs in Spain.

IntroductionThere is little evidence on the relationship between achieved low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and costs in patients on lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). We described healthcare resource use and costs (direct and indirect) by achieved LDL-C in patients receiving LLT after a recent myocardial infarction (MI) in Spain.MethodsThis was a retrospective observational study of anonymized electronic medical records from seven regions in Spain (BIG-PAC® database; n = 1.9 million). Eligible patients were adults (≥ 18 years) hospitalized for an MI between January 2015 and December 2017, treated with a statin and/or ezetimibe, and having recorded LDL-C values at baseline and during follow-up. Healthcare resource use and direct and indirect costs (in 2018, €) were described by achieved LDL-C levels during a follow-up of 18 months.ResultsOf 6025 patients (mean age, 69.7 years; 77% male), only 11% achieved LDL-C goals as defined in the 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines (< 70 mg/dL), and just 1% reached the lower target (< 55 mg/dL) in the current 2019 guidelines. Achieving lower LDL-C levels translated to lower healthcare resource use and costs. Mean total (direct and indirect) costs ranged from €5044 for patients with LDL-C < 55 mg/dL to €7567 for patients with LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL.ConclusionVery few patients achieved recommended LDL-C goals despite using LLT. Achieving lower LDL-C levels after an MI might be associated with lower healthcare resource use and costs. Use of more intensive LLT, leading to greater reductions in LDL-C, could therefore be beneficial both from a clinical and an economic perspective.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02187-1.