The current study developed and evaluated the engineering properties of improved low-cost UEBs reinforced with various lime (L)-coal fly ash (F)-wood aggregate (W) mix ratios. The objectives were; (1) to determine the effects of lime-coal fly ash-wood aggregate mixtures on mechanical strength and water resistance properties of UEBs; and (2) to determine the comparative cost of the improved UEBs to that of the control (10% cement). Four UEBs with various lime (L)-coal fly ash (F)-wood aggregates (W) mix ratios (L4%-F16%-W1.5%; L4%-F16%-W3%; L8%-F12%-W3%; L10%-F10%-W1.5%) were fabricated and their engineering properties compared to those of unstabilised (negative control) and 10% cement stabilized (positive control) unfired earth bricks. Dry compressive strength (DCS) of UEBs stabilized by L10%-F10%-W1.5% (8.3 MPa) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than that of 10% cement stabilized unfired bricks (7 MPa). DCS and dry density of the four UEBs conformed to the British Standards for low-density clay masonry units. DCS increased with lime-fly ash ratio according to a power function (y=−5.41x2+11.18x+2.22; r2 =0.95, p = 0.018), attaining a maximum of 8.3 MPa at a ratio of 1: 1. However, UEBs had low wet strength, but incorporation of 4% cement significantly increased (p < 0.001) the wet compressive strength of UEBs to 0.94 MPa. UEBs stabilized by 10% lime, 10% coal ash, 1.5% wood aggregates and 4% cement (L10%-F10%-W1.5%-C4%) had water absorption (15.8%) similar to that of 10% cement stabilized UEBs. Moreover, unfired earth bricks reinforced by L10%-F10%-W1.5%-C4% conformed to British Standards engineering specifications for low-density clay masonry units, while the cost was 50% lower than that of cement stabilized bricks, demonstrating the low-cost of the UEBs. In summary, the results demonstrate that improved low-cost UEBs can be developed by incorporating lime, coal fly ash and wood aggregates, but a little cement (4%) may be required to increase the wet compressive strength. Potential applications of the UEBs include, (1) internal partitioning; (2) construction of low-cost housing for low-income households in developing countries, and (3) the provision of temporary or short-term low-cost shelter for displaced persons in humanitarian emergencies.
Read full abstract