Abstract For many years, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was the standard assay for studying epigenetic mechanisms. However, two new versatile techniques have recently been developed that are faster, experimentally easier, and more cost-effective than ChIP. Cleavage Under Targets & Release Using Nuclease (CUT&RUN) and Cleavage Under Targets & Tagmentation (CUT&Tag) can be used for understanding protein-DNA interactions within the natural chromatin context of the cell. Both CUT&RUN and CUT&Tag can be combined with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) to analyze the function of histone modifications and the binding of transcription factors, DNA replication factors, or DNA repair proteins across the genome. CUT&RUN and CUT&Tag are rapid, robust, and true low cell number methods for the detection of protein-DNA interactions. Unlike ChIP, both assays are free of formaldehyde cross-linking, chromatin fragmentation, and immunoprecipitation. When compared to ChIP, CUT&RUN and CUT&Tag require fewer starting cells (as low as 5,000 – 20,000), are shorter assays (one day from cells to DNA), and generate lower background signal (requiring fewer sequencing reads). At Cell Signaling Technology (CST), we have developed ChIP-seq, CUT&RUN, and CUT&Tag assay kits and validated a broad set of antibodies against histone modifications, transcription factors, and cofactors that are compatible with these kits. This poster will discuss the fundamentals of all three assays and highlight important factors to consider when selecting an assay for your experiment. Through our antibody validation efforts, we have also generated a unique and extensive archive of ChIP-seq, CUT&RUN, and CUT&Tag NGS data using recombinant, monoclonal antibodies. This allows for the controlled comparison of these three commonly used chromatin profiling techniques. In this poster, I will highlight the similarities and differences between these assays when mapping a variety of histone modifications, transcription factors, and cofactor binding events across multiple sample types. Citation Format: Angela H. Guo, Christopher R. Comeau, Fang Chen. Selecting your epigenomic assay: Comparing ChIP-seq, CUT&RUN, and CUT&Tag [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 7021.