Low Back Pain In Workers Research Articles

Relation between functional characteristics of the trunk and the occurrence of low back pain. Associated risk factors.

A 2-year prospective study relating a set of subject characteristics (professional and extraprofessional constraints, personal and anthropometric characteristics, and static and dynamic performance of the trunk) and incidence of low back pain in a population of male Belgian steel workers. To investigate the relation between occurrence of new cases of low back pain and prior personal, anthropometric, or functional characteristics. Some functional characteristics--in particular, dynamic parameters of the trunk such as the velocity--have been shown to be significantly reduced for low back pain in workers in cross-sectional studies. The question remained as to whether modifications of these parameters preceded the development of low back pain. The protocol included a questionnaire, a clinical examination, anthropometric measurements, and a set of functional tests on an isoinertial dynamometer. It was carried out twice, after a 1-year interval, on a sample of 215 workers without any history of low back pain. The reports of low back pain were again investigated 1 year later. The development of low back pain is related to frontal plane imbalance of the trunk, lower body weight, and perception of heavy lifting efforts at the workplace. Individuals performing dynamic tests at higher velocities appear also to be at a greater risk of low back pain. Although workers with a history of low back pain performed dynamic tests at significantly lower velocities, the probability for development of low back pain in the following year is greater for workers performing such tests at greater velocities.

腰痛についてのアンケート調査

腰痛についてのアンケート調査

Risk Indicators of Low Back Pain Among Workers in Japan

A questionnaire was given to 3,042 Japanese workers at a factory in 1992. It surveyed age, gender, weight, height, job classification, and work environment, as well as the perceived causes, onset age, and characteristics of low back pain. Family history of low back pain among first-degree relatives and perception of physical condition also were assessed. To investigate the risk indicators of low back pain in Japanese workers with various kinds of job classifications in a manufacturing company. Risk indicators of low back pain in Japanese patients have not been fully investigated in previous studies. Prevalence rates and characteristics of low back pain were examined among 3,042 factory workers (2,517 men and 525 woman) with jobs with varying physical demands. In the analysis of risk indicators of low back pain, the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were computed. In addition, a multiple logistic analysis was performed to evaluate risk indicators of low back pain. Point and lifetime prevalence of low back pain were correlated with the physical demands of the job. The perceived cause found to be most associated with low back pain were lifting in workers with jobs requiring moderate to heavy work and sports activity in sedentary workers. Family history of low back pain in parents, siblings, and children was a risk indicator of low back pain. The average age of the first attack of low back pain in workers with a family history of it in their parents was significantly younger than that in workers with no family history in a multiple logistic analysis in male workers, the physical work demands, age, and family history of low back pain in their parents were risk indicators; however, obesity was not a risk indicator. Physical and mental conditions of workers also were associated with low back pain. The physical job demands show a clear association with the point and lifetime prevalence of low back pain, and improvements in work conditions may decrease low back symptoms among workers. It is likely that a family history of low back pain and physical and mental conditions of workers also should be considered in the management of low back pain.

The cost of 1989 workers' compensation low back pain claims.

Cost data were gathered from computerized records of the Liberty Mutual Insurance Company for low back pain workers' compensation claims (N = 119,107) and for all claims (N = 731,087) initiated from 45 jurisdictions (states) during 1989. This study provided more current, accurate, and additional information to estimate the costs and incidence associated with compensable low back pain compared with all compensation claims. The first group of data included all compensable low back claims selected by specific codes: body part codes consisted of low back area, sacrum and coccyx, disc, and multiple trunk; injury codes consisted of strain, sprain, inflammation, rupture, hernia, fracture, and contusion. The second sample included all compensable claims, including both occupational injuries and illnesses. Low back pain cases represented 16% of all claims but 33% of all claims costs; 55.4% of the low back pain cases received medical payments only (i.e., did not receive indemnity payments for lost time). The mean cost per case for low back pain was $8321; median cost per case was $396. Medical costs represented 32.4% of the total costs; indemnity costs (i.e., payment for lost time) represented 65.8%. Since indemnity costs represent the greatest percentage of workers' compensation expenditure, the primary goal of low back pain management should be the prevention or reduction of prolonged disability.