Low Back Pain Group Research Articles

The effect of modified paramedian and median approaches of spinal anesthesia on postspinal acute low back pain in patients undergoing urological surgery: a prospective cohort study

Background: Low back pain after spinal anesthesia may be a complicated issue for many patients. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of postspinal low back pain in the modified paramedian approach of spinal anesthesia compared to the classical median approach.Materials and Method: The study is a prospective non-randomized observational trial. We included 297 patients aged 20 to 80 years who underwent urological surgery under spinal anesthesia. Patients were allocated into two groups: In Group P, patients underwent spinal anesthesia by using a modified paramedian approach and in Group M, the classical median approach was used. Primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative low back pain. Secondary outcomes were number of needle insertion attempts, needle bone contacts and patient satisfaction.Results: The incidence of low back pain in Group M was 70.3% on the first day, 39.5% on the 7th day and 5.9% at the end of one month after surgery. In Group P, the incidence of low back pain was 30.7% on the first day, 12.4% on the 7th day and 0.7% at the end of one month after surgery. The low back pain scores were significantly lower in group P at all-time points. Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in group P (p=0.038). The number of needle interventions (p=0.001) and bone contact (p=0.000) were significantly lower in group P.Conclusions: Low back pain was less common with the modified paramedian approach compared to the classical median spinal approach. We found lower number of needle insertion attempts and bone contacts in the modified paramedian technique. Patient satisfaction was also higher in the paramedian technique.

Implications for fall efficacy strategies on center of pressure and center of gravity sway distances in adults with chronic low back pain.

Although chronic low back pain (LBP) is a complex condition often associated with altered motor control and compensatory postural adjustments, existing literature provides inconsistent reports on the underlying control mechanisms for maintaining balance. This study aimed to compare differences in sway distances between the center of pressure (COP) and the center of gravity (COG), while considering limb dominance, in adults with and without LBP. There were 26 subjects with LBP and 39 control subjects who performed three repeated unilateral standing tasks on a force platform. Outcome measures included the sway distances between COP and COG in the anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions, as well as the results of the fall efficacy scale (FES). A significant group interaction was demonstrated on limb dominance and direction for the sway distance (F = 5.46, p = 0.02). Specifically, the third trial in the ML direction while standing on the dominant limb indicated a significant difference in COP-COG sway distance (t = -2.30, p = 0.01). When FES scores were used as a covariate, a significant three-way interaction (dominance x direction x trial) was found (F = 4.06, p = 0.04). Although no significant group interaction was observed for dominance, direction, and trial, the LBP group demonstrated an ability to leverage fall efficacy following repeated trials to reduce ML balance deficits. Clinicians should consider neuromuscular control and limb dominance when developing fall efficacy strategies for postural adaptations in adults with LBP.

Pelvic and Lower Limb Kinematics in Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain During Sit-to-Stand Function: A Cross-Sectional Study

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the 3-dimensional movement kinematics of pelvic and lower limb joints in CLBP subjects, compared to healthy individuals, utilizing a functional data analysis (FDA) approach. MethodsIn this study, a 7-camera Qualisys motion capture system was employed to record the kinematics of the pelvic, hip, knee, and ankle joints in 20 patients with low back pain (LBP) and 20 control subjects on both sides during the sit-to-stand motion. An FDA statistical approach was utilized to compare the data collected over time between the 2 groups. The STS task was divided into two distinct phases: the prelift off phase (pre-Lo) and the postlift off phase (post-Lo). ResultsDuring the “pre-Lo phase” of the STS motion, our statistical analysis revealed that the only significant difference between the two groups was a decreased medial rotation (P = .00) in the hip joint position of LBP patients on their dominant side, in comparison to healthy subjects. As for the “post-Lo phase,” the LBP group exhibited a more anterior pelvic tilt position (P = .00) and increased pelvic counterclockwise rotation (P = .03) in the sagittal and transverse planes when compared to the control group. Regarding hip joints, the LBP group demonstrated a more flexed position (indicative of reduced extension) on both the dominant (P = .00) and nondominant (P = .00) sides, coupled with diminished abduction (P = .04) and internal rotation (P = .03) of the hip on the dominant side. In relation to the knee and ankle joints, the results indicated a more adducted knee position (P = .00) and decreased ankle joint flexion (P = .02) on the dominant side in CLBP subjects when compared to the healthy group during the STS motion. ConclusionOur findings indicate that patients with CLBP exhibited distinct kinematic patterns in the pelvic and lower limb joints during the STS motion. These kinematic alterations primarily manifest in the joints of the dominant limb, with most of the differences observed during the second phase (postlift off phase) of the motion. It appears that these changes in pelvic and lower limb joint kinematics should be taken into account when planning future rehabilitation programs for CLBP patients engaged in this task.

The effect of visual cues at different heights on sit-to-stand movements in people with and without low back pain

BackgroundInvestigating movement strategies that can be utilized to avoid pain-provocation could enhance the management of low back pain episodes. ObjectiveTo assess the effect of visual cues at different heights on the kinematics of sit-to-stand movements, as well as perceived difficulty and pain levels. DesignCross-over design comparing individuals with low back pain to healthy controls. Methods26 asymptomatic controls and 15 individuals with chronic, recurrent low back pain performed 5 sets of 5 sit-to-stand movements. High, middle, and low visual cues were used during sets 2–4. Spinal sagittal plane range of motion, peak spinal flexion and extension angles, and trunk centre of mass velocity were obtained from kinematic data. ResultsThe low cue led to significantly more head and lumbar spine flexion, while the high cue led to significantly more head and thoracic spine extension and increased thoracic spine range of motion. The low back pain group demonstrated a significantly lower vertical trunk centre of mass velocity than the control group during the high cue trials. There was a significant association between higher perceived difficulty scores and lower trunk centre of mass velocity for the low back pain group. Pain scores were not significantly different between cue conditions. ConclusionVisual cues can be used to temporarily change the spinal kinematics of sit-to-stand movements in people with and without low back pain. This could be helpful in clinical practice to encourage more, or less, movement in specific spinal regions, and avoid pain provocation to facilitate functional rehabilitation.

Association Between Dominant-Shoulder Internal-Rotation Restriction and Low-Back Pain in Elite Male High School Soft Tennis Players.

The incidence of low-back pain (LBP)is high among elite male high school soft tennis players. A previous report showed that hip internal-rotation (IR) restriction in the non-dominant leg could increase the risk of LBP. Moreover, IR in the dominant shoulder is important for serve and stroke movements, suggesting that IR restriction in the dominant shoulder can contribute to LBP. The simultaneous incidence of non-dominant-hip IR restriction may help in developing a good LBP-related factor model; therefore, this study aimed to investigate the association between dominant-shoulder IR restriction and LBP in elite male high school soft tennis players. This is a single-center cross-sectional study. This study included 176 male high school soft tennis players from 14 elite teams. The main measures were IR and external-rotation range of motion (ROM) in the dominant and non-dominant shoulders and hip, assessed using a goniometer with a bubble attached. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed with the presence of LBP as a categorical variable (LBP, 1; non-LBP (NLBP), 0). Multiple logistic regression models were created as follows: Model 1 included dominant-shoulder IR restriction (loss of glenohumeral IR (GIRLoss)), Model 2 included non-dominant-hip IR ROM, and Model 3 included both GIRLoss and non-dominant-hip IR ROM as the main explanatory variables to test the association between dominant-shoulder IR restriction and LBP, compare its suitability as an associated factor with non-dominant-hip IR restriction, and determine if either or both should be considered in an LBP association model based on model fit. The significance of each multiple logistic regression model was examined using the model χ2 test, and a model with P<0.05 was judged as a significant model. Model fit was examined using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and P≥0.05 was judged as a good model fit. The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) were used to compare the goodness-of-fit among multiple logistic regression models. Results: The LBP and non-LBP groups comprised 59 and 117 players, respectively. GIRLoss in the dominant shoulder was a significant independent factor (odds ratio: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.09; P<0.01) in Model 3, which included hip IR restriction in the non-dominant leg (odds ratio: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.86-0.94; P<0.01).In all models, the explanatory variables fitted were significantly associated with LBP, indicating that the models were significant and fitted well: the AICs (and BICs) for Models 1, 2, and 3 were 198.4 (207.6), 178.6 (187.9), and 168.8 (181.1), respectively, indicating that Model 3 was the best fit. In elite male high school soft tennis players, IR restriction in the dominant shoulder was associated with LBP. IR restriction in the dominant shoulder and non-dominant hip as a significant factor for LBP may contribute to developing an optimal multiple logistic regression model for LBP.

Predictors of Postoperative Persistent Low Back Pain Following Lumbar Fusion in Patients Older than 75 Years: An Analysis of a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

PurposeThis study aimed to evaluate pre- and perioperative predictors associated with persistent low back pain (LBP) following lumbar fusion in patients aged > 75 years. MethodsThis single-center retrospective study examined 310 patients aged > 75 years who underwent lumbar fusion for lumbar degenerative disease (104 males, 206 females; mean age, 79 [75–90] years). The visual analog scale (VAS) score for LBP was examined preoperatively and 2-year postoperatively. The persistent LBP group comprised patients with a 2-year postoperative LBP-VAS score ≥ 3. The demographic and preoperative radiographic parameters were also reviewed. A multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed of variables with values of P < 0.2 on the univariate analysis. ResultsNinety-nine patients (32%) experienced persistent postoperative LBP. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age < 82 years, history of previous lumbar decompression, and greater preoperative VAS score for LBP were associated with greater postoperative persistent LBP after lumbar fusion, whereas other factors, such as gender, body mass index, osteoporosis, diabetes mellitus, depression, symptom duration, operative time, estimated blood loss, and spinopelvic sagittal parameters, were not. ConclusionsThis study showed that a relatively younger age, history of preoperative lumbar decompression, and greater preoperative VAS score for LBP were preoperative predictors of postoperative persistent LBP following lumbar fusion in elderly patients. In contrast, preoperative spinopelvic sagittal parameters were not associated with persistent postoperative LBP. Although lumbar fusion is expected to improve LBP, surgeons should pay attention to age, surgical history, and preoperative back pain intensity.

The clinical utility of the prone hip extension test in the diagnosis of motor control impairments associated with low back pain: A cross-sectional study using motion capture and electromyography

BackgroundThe prone hip extension test is used as a clinical tool to diagnose specific motor control impairments that have been identified in individuals with chronic low back pain. However, conventional protocols for performing the test are subjective and lack evidence for their effectiveness. The objective of the current study was to quantify lumbopelvic motion and muscle activation during this test and identify which motor control patterns best distinguish individuals with low back pain from asymptomatic controls. Methods18 individuals with sub-acute or chronic low back pain and 32 asymptomatic controls performed the prone hip extension test while a 3D motion capture system measured lumbar and pelvic movement patterns and an electromyography system measured the muscle activation patterns of the paraspinal, gluteus maximus, and hamstring muscles. A three-stage statistical analysis was performed, the final stage being a stepwise logistic regression analysis aimed at identifying the movement and muscle activation pattern variables that best distinguished the two groups. FindingsThe final regression model included three lumbar kinematic variables and several electromyographic amplitude variables for the gluteus maximus and hamstring muscles during right-sided prone hip extension. The final model correctly classified 86.7 % of the control group and 83.3 % of the low back pain group. InterpretationThe subject of asymmetrical gluteus maximus and hamstring muscle activation appears to be a potentially interesting area for future research on the utility of the prone hip extension test as a clinical tool in diagnosing motor control impairments associated with low back pain.

Examining Movement Patterns, Skeletal Muscle Mass, and Hip Mobility in Office Workers With or Without Lower Back Pain: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study.

The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between Functional Movement Screen (FMS), skeletal muscle mass, and hip mobility in office workers with or without chronic lower back pain (LBP), as well as to determine whether the above items differed between office workers with or without chronic LBP. This study utilized an analytic cross-sectional design. The participants were 35 office workers (14 in the LBP group and 21 in the non-lower back pain group, or NLBP) who were willing to cooperate with the request for cooperation in this study. Movement patterns were assessed by FMS and skeletal muscle mass was measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis. Hip mobility was measured by prone hip extension (PHE) and straight leg raising. The correlations between each item and differences in the presence or absence of LBP were analyzed. The LBP and NLBP groups showed different correlations (p<0.05) between total and subcategory scores and skeletal muscle mass. Total FMS score (p=0.02, r=-0.40) and PHE angle (p=0.01, r=0.43) were significantly higher in the LBP group than in the NLBP group. The FMS shows different relationships between total and subcategory scores and skeletal muscle mass for office workers with or without LBP. In addition, office workers with LBP may have different movement patterns and greater hip extension range of motion than those without LBP.

Neuroinflammatory activation in sensory and motor regions of the cortex is related to sensorimotor function in individuals with low back pain maintained by nociplastic mechanisms: A preliminary proof-of-concept study.

Chronic pain involves communication between neural and immune systems. Recent data suggest localization of glial (brain immune cells) activation to the sensorimotor regions of the brain cortex (S1/M1) in chronic low back pain (LBP). As glia perform diverse functions that impact neural function, activation might contribute to sensorimotor changes, particularly in LBP maintained by increased nervous system sensitivity (i.e., nociplastic pain). This preliminary proof-of-concept study aimed to: (i) compare evidence of neuroinflammatory activation in S1/M1 between individuals with and without LBP (and between nociceptive and nociplastic LBP phenotypes), and (ii) evaluate relationships between neuroinflammatory activation and sensorimotor function. Simultaneous PET-fMRI measured neuroinflammatory activation in functionally defined S1/M1 in pain-free individuals (n = 8) and individuals with chronic LBP (n = 9; nociceptive: n = 4, nociplastic: n = 5). Regions of S1/M1 related to the back were identified using fMRI during motor tasks and thermal stimuli. Sensorimotor measures included single and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and quantitative sensory testing (QST). Sleep, depression, disability and pain questionnaires were administered. Neuroinflammatory activation was greater in the lower back cortical representation of S1/M1 of the nociplastic LBP group than both nociceptive LBP and pain-free groups. Neuroinflammatory activation in S1/M1 was positively correlated with sensitivity to hot (r = 0.52) and cold (r = 0.55) pain stimuli, poor sleep, depression, disability and BMI, and negatively correlated with intracortical facilitation (r = -0.41). This preliminary proof-of-concept study suggests that neuroinflammation in back regions of S1/M1 in individuals with nociplastic LBP could plausibly explain some characteristic features of this LBP phenotype. Neuroinflammatory activation localized to sensorimotor areas of the brain in individuals with nociplastic pain might contribute to changes in sensory and motor function and aspects of central sensitization. If cause-effect relationships are established in longitudinal studies, this may direct development of therapies that target neuroinflammatory activation.

Comparing the Scores of The Functional Movement Screen™ in Individuals with Low Back Pain versus Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The Functional Movement Screen™ (FMS™) is widely used to assess functional movement patterns and illuminate movement dysfunctions that may have a role in injury risk. However, the association between FMS™ scores and LBP remains uncertain. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine functional movement scores among patients with low back pain (LBP) and healthy subjects with no LBP and review the validity of the FMS™ tool for screening functional movement among LBP patients. The systematic review and meta-analysis included papers assessing functional movement among adult patients with LBP using the FMS™ through a literature review of five databases. The search strategy focused used relevant keywords: Functional movement screen AND low back pain. The review included all papers assessing functional movement among LBP adult patients (>18 years old) using the FMS™ published between 2003 to 2023. The risk of bias in the involved studies was evaluated using the updated Cochrane ROB 2 tool. Statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager software, version 5.4. The meta-analysis included the total FMS™ score and the scores of the seven FMS™ movement patterns. Seven studies were included in this systematic review were considered to have low to unclear risk of bias. The meta-analysis revealed that the LBP group had a significantly lower total FMS™ score than the control group by 1.81 points (95% CI (-3.02, -0.59), p= 0.004). Patients with LBP had a significantly lower score than the control group regarding FMS™ movement patterns, the deep squat (p <0.01), the hurdle step (p <0.01), the inline lunge (P value <0.01), the active straight leg raise (p <0.01), the trunk stability push-up (p=0.02), and the rotational stability screens (p <0.01). Lower scores on the FMS™ are associated with impaired functional movement. Identifying the specific functional movement impairments linked to LBP can assist in the creation of personalized treatment plans and interventions. Further research is needed to assess the association of cofounders, such as age, gender, and body mass index, with the FMS™ score among LBP patients and controls. 1.

Role of the Flexion Relaxation Phenomenon in the Analysis of Low Back Pain Risk in the Powerlifter: A Proof-of-Principle Study.

Unlike the most common training approaches for bodybuilding, powerlifting programs are generally based on maximum and submaximal loads, putting enormous stresses on the lumbar spine. The flexion relaxation phenomenon evaluation is a clinical tool used for low back pain (LBP) assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the role of the flexion relaxation phenomenon in the analysis of LBP in the powerlifters. Healthy professional powerlifters participated in the study. In fact, we divided the participants into a LBP-low-risk group and a LBP-high-risk group, based on a prior history of LBP. Outcome measures included flexion relaxation ratio (FRR) and trough surface electromyography collected during trunk maximum voluntary flexion; furthermore, during a bench press lifting, we measured the height of the arched back(ARCH), using a camera and the Kinovea video editing software, to consider a potential correlation with the risk of LBP. We included a group of 18 male (aged 24-39y) powerlifters of 93kg category. We measured a nonsignificant mean difference of ARCH between low-risk LBP group and high-risk LBP subjects. Curiously, maximum voluntary flexions were both above the threshold of 3.2μV; therefore, with an absence of appropriate myoelectric silence, on the contrary, the FRR ratios were higher than 9.5, considering the presence of the phenomenon, exclusively for the low-risk group. The lumbar arched back measurement data did not report any association with the LBP risk, regarding the maximum voluntary flexion value, and even more than the FRR there is a relationship with the presence or the absence of LBP risk. FRR could be considered as a useful parameter for studying the risk of LBP in powerlifting. The FRR index not only refers to the possible myoelectric silence of the lumbar muscles in trunk maximum forward flexion but also takes into account the energy value delivered by the lumbar muscles during the flexion. Furthermore, we can indicate that the size of the powerlifter ARCH may not be a determining factor in the occurrence of LBP.

Postural and Lumbopelvic Control: Crucial Factors in the Functionality of Patients with Low Back Pain-A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most prevalent musculoskeletal disorders in adults worldwide. Alterations in postural and lumbopelvic control and functionality appear to be determining factors in its resolution. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed. Patients with LBP were enrolled. Lumbar pain; postural control (PC), total area of the center of pressure (TACOP), and the velocity of the center of pressure (VCOP); lumbopelvic control (LPC); and functionality were evaluated. Statistical tests were implemented to determine differences between sex and age and correlation models among the variables. Results: Thirty adult patients with LBP were analyzed. A strong relationship was found between pain and functionality [r = 0.64; p < 0.001]. A moderate relationship was found between pain and TACOP [r = 0.395; p = 0.031]. A moderate relationship was observed between TACOP and functionality [0.413; p = 0.023] and between LPC and TACOP [r = 0.416; p = 0.001]. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the significant impact of LBP on postural control, lumbopelvic control, and functionality. These results highlight the importance of addressing postural and lumbopelvic control in LBP treatment. No significant differences based on gender and age were found, but all clinical variables differed significantly between the LBP and control groups, underscoring the unique impairments associated with LBP.

Using continuous relative phase and modified vector coding analyses to quantify spinal coordination and coordinative variability for healthy and chronic low back pain patients: An exploratory comparative analysis

Differences in coordination and coordinative variability are common in people with low back pain. While differences may relate to the different analyses used to quantify these metrics, the preferred approach remains unclear. We aimed to compare coordination and coordinative variability, in people with and without low back pain performing a lifting/lowering task, using continuous relative phase and vector coding procedures, and to identify which technique better detects group differences. Upper lumbar (T12-L3), lower lumbar (L3-S1), and hip angular kinematics were measured using electromagnetic motion capture during 10 crate lifting/lowering repetitions from adults with (n = 47) and without (n = 17) low back pain. Coordination and coordinative variability for the Hip-Lower Lumbar and Lower Lumbar-Upper Lumbar joint pairs were quantified using mean absolute relative phase and deviation phase (continuous relative phase), and coupling angle and coupling angle variability (vector coding), respectively. T-tests examined group differences in coordination and variability. Cohen’s d bootstrapping analyses identified the more sensitive technique for detecting group differences. Less in-phase and more variable behavior was observed in the low back pain group, mostly independent of joint pair and analytical technique (P < 0.05, Cohen’s d range = 0.61 to 1.33). Qualitatively, the low back group limited motion at the lower lumbar spine during lifting/lowering. Continuous relative phase was more sensitive in detecting group differences in coordinative variability, while vector coding was more sensitive towards differences in coordination. These procedures convey distinct information and have their respective merits. Researchers should consider the choice of analytical techniques based on their study objectives.

The role of muscle function and pointe shoe characteristics in Arabesque movement among ballet dancers with non-specific low back pain

ABSTRACT This study aimed to investigate posterior chain muscle function and the influence of pointe shoes in ballet dancers with and without low back pain (LBP) in the Arabesque. Twenty-nine young professional ballet dancers (17 with LBP and 12 healthy controls) were recruited. Muscle strength and mechanical properties of the erector spinae and hamstrings were assessed. The displacement of centre of mass (COM) during Arabesque under different shoe conditions (R-class, Chacott, and own shoes) was measured with a motion capture system. The LBP group exhibited greater dynamic stiffness and decreased mechanical stress relaxation time in the lateral hamstring compared to the control group. During Arabesque, the LBP group demonstrated significantly greater anterior-posterior displacement of the COM and a larger percentage of time to achieve maximal trunk extension angle. The COM displacement in vertical and medial-lateral directions was smaller in the R-class than in their own shoes. LBP impacts muscle mechanical properties, particularly in the lateral hamstring. The compromised muscle function resulted in a longer time to spinal extension during Arabesque, signifying that reduced trunk control contributed to greater COM displacement. Hence, it is essential to emphasise that evaluating muscle properties and dynamic postural control is imperative for dancers experiencing LBP.

A study on the effects of visual condition on postural stability in adults with and without chronic low back pain

This study was conducted to compare postural stability during repeated unilateral standing tasks between adults with and without chronic low back pain (LBP) while considering visual input. The study involved 26 participants with LBP and 39 control participants. Each participant performed three trials of standing tasks on the dominant limb using a stable platform. The Falls Efficacy Scale was utilized to assess fall-related self-efficacy and fear of falling due to potential physical frailty. The center of pressure (COP) sway excursion was analyzed at 10 mm and 20 mm thresholds for the time-in-boundary (TIB). The results indicated a significant fear of falling difference in the LBP group compared to the control group (t = 3.27, p = 0.001). The LBP group demonstrated a significant interaction between visual condition and TIB (F = 8.45, p = 0.01), particularly in the LBP group, which demonstrated a notable decrease in TIB at 10 mm (54.02 % compared to the control group's 70.40 %) and 20 mm (70.93 % compared to the control group's 85.92 %) thresholds during the second trial and at 10 mm (59.73 % compared to the control group's 73.84 %) during the third trial in the eyes open condition. Overall, visual condition demonstrated significant interactions on thresholds (F = 15.80, p = 0.001, η2p = 0.21) as well as trials × thresholds (F = 4.21, p = 0.04, η2p = 0.07). These findings indicate a potential adaptation in postural control among the LBP group with visual feedback. Further research is warranted to explore group differences when considering visual conditions and sway excursion thresholds.

Comparison of the masses and amounts of intramuscular non-contractile tissue of the lower extremity muscles, mobility and balance ability, and cognitive function between older adults with and without low back pain: A pilot study

IntroductionThis study compared the masses and amounts of intramuscular non-contractile tissue of multiple lower extremity muscles measured using an ultrasound imaging device, as well as the mobility and balance ability and cognitive function between community-dwelling older adults with and without low back pain (LBP). MethodsTwenty-five community-dwelling older adults were classified into control (CTR) (n = 17, asymptomatic) and LBP (n = 8) groups. The current LBP status in the LBP group was as follows: duration period: 99.4 ± 81.3 months, Numerical Rating Scale: 4.8 ± 0.9, and Oswestry Disability Index: 15.3 ± 10.4%. The thicknesses and the echo intensities of various muscles (gluteus maximus, medius, and minimus; rectus femoris; vastus intermedius and lateralis; long and short heads of the biceps femoris; semitendinosus; semimembranosus; tibialis anterior; medial head of the gastrocnemius; soleus; and tibialis posterior) were measured using an ultrasound imaging device. Mobility and balance ability were assessed by measuring the usual and maximal walking speeds, timed up-and-go time, five-chair-stand time, and one-legged stance time. Mini-Mental State Examination scores were also assessed. ResultsThe gluteus medius muscle thickness was significantly lower in the LBP group than in the CTR group. The thicknesses and echo intensities of the other lower extremity muscles did not differ significantly between the CTR and LBP groups. The usual walking speed was also significantly slower in the LBP group than in the CTR group. Balance ability and cognitive function did not differ significantly between the two groups. ConclusionThe results of the present study demonstrated lower gluteus medius muscle mass and slower usual walking speed in community-dwelling older adults with LBP compared to those in older adults without LBP; however, other variables did not differ significantly between these groups.

Effectiveness Of E-Backnshou Exercise To The Improvement Of Neck, Shoulder And Back Pain In Computer Vision Syndrome Patient

BACKGROUND : Extra-ocular complaints of Computer Vision Syndrome (CVS) are neck, shoulder, back pain. The 20-20-20 rule and E-BACKNSHOU exercise are expected to improve accommodative mechanisms, ocular surface of the eye and extra ocular symptoms of CVS. AIMS : Proving the effectiveness of E-BACKNSHOU exercise for the improvement of neck, shoulder and back pain in CVS patient. METHOD : The research design was Pre-Post Test with Control Design. Subjects were 30 medical students of Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia who experienced CVS and neck, shoulder and back pain. The treatment group got the 20-20-20 rule and E-BACKNSHOU exercise and the control group got the 20-20-20 rule for 1 month. Pain was measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Statistical test was conducted using paired t-test, unpaired t-test and chi square. Value of significance p&lt;0.05. RESULT : There were significant differences in VAS score of neck, shoulder, upper back pain (p=0.00), and low back pain (p=0.022) before and after the intervention in the treatment group and VAS score of neck (p=0,002), shoulder (p=0.020), upper back (p=0.011), and low back pain (p=0.019) in the control group. Delta VAS score of the treatment group was greater than the control group and there was a significant difference in delta VAS score of shoulder pain (p=0,030), but there were no significant differences in delta VAS score of neck (p=0,934), upper back (p=0,356), and low back pain (p=0,150). CONCLUSION : The effectiveness of 20-20-20 rule and E-BACKNSHOU exercise is better than the 20-20-20 rule alone on treating neck, shoulder and back pain in CVS patient.

Poor lumbar spine coordination in acute low back pain predicts persistent long-term pain and disability

PurposeSitting balance on an unstable surface requires coordinated out-of-phase lumbar spine and provides sufficient challenge to expose quality of spine control. We investigated whether the quality of spine coordination to maintain balance in acute low back pain (LBP) predicts recovery at 6 months.MethodsParticipants in an acute LBP episode (n = 94) underwent assessment of sitting balance on an unstable surface. Seat, hip and spine (lower lumbar, lumbar, upper lumbar, thoracic) angular motion and force plate data were recorded. Coordination between the seat and hip/spine segments to maintain balance was quantified in the frequency domain to evaluate coordination (coherence) and relative timing (phase angle: in-phase [segments move together]; out-of-phase [segments move opposite]). Center of pressure (CoP) and upper thorax motion assessed overall balance performance. Hip and spine coordination with the seat were compared between those who did not recover (increased/unchanged pain/disability), partially recovered (reduced pain/disability) or recovered (no pain and disability) at 6 months.ResultsIn both planes, coherence between the seat and lower lumbar spine was lower (and in-phase—unhelpful for balance) at baseline in those who did not recover than those who recovered. Coherence between the seat and hip was higher in partially recovered in both planes, suggesting compensation by the hip. LBP groups had equal overall balance performance (CoP, upper thorax motion), but non-recovery groups used a less optimal strategy that might have consequences for long-term spine health.ConclusionThese longitudinal data revealed that individuals with compromised contribution of the lumbar spine to the balance during unstable sitting during acute LBP are less likely to recover.

Multifidus lesions: A possible pathological component in patients with low back pain after posterior lumbar surgery.

There are few histological studies on multifidus after lumbar surgery, and it is not clear whether multifidus changes affect the clinical outcome after lumbar surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between multifidus changes and clinical outcomes after lumbar surgery. Patients underwent internal fixation removal after lumbar posterior surgery were enrolled. Patients were divided into a low back pain (LBP) group (n = 15) and a non-low back pain (non-LBP) group (n = 10).The Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) were completed. 18 patients with lumbar fracture surgery were included as the control group. Multifidus morphological changes were observed by hematoxylin and eosin and Masson staining. The expression of TGF-β1 was observed by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence and Western blot. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the multifidus in the non-LBP group and the control group were greater than those in the LBP group. TGF-β1 expression and gray value ratio in the non-LBP group and the control group were lower than those in the LBP group. The multifidus CSA and TGF-β1 expression in multifidus were strongly correlated with ODI and VAS. Patients with LBP after posterior lumbar surgery suffered from atrophy and fibrosis lesions in the multifidus, and the degree of multifidus lesions was closely related to dysfunction and pain, which might be one of the causes of LBP after posterior lumbar surgery.

Identifying Risk Factors for Preexisting or Developing Low Back Pain in Youth, High School, and Collegiate Lacrosse Players Using 3-Dimensional Motion Analysis.

Low back pain (LBP) is a common condition that can affect athletes of all ages. The risk factors for LBP onset and worsening associated with the lacrosse shooting motion are not yet known. To identify training and biomechanical factors associated with preexisting LBP and development of LBP over 6 months in youth, high school, and collegiate lacrosse players. Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. A total of 128 lacrosse players were enrolled in this study between January 2016 and January 2019. Player characteristics, lacrosse experience, and participation in other sports were self-reported. At baseline and 2-, 4-, and 6-month follow-ups, the players self-rated the presence and severity of LBP using a numeric pain rating scale (0-10 points). Participants were grouped according to LBP symptoms: no LBP at any time point (n = 102), preexisting LBP (n = 17), or developed LBP within the 6-month period (n = 9). The lacrosse shooting motion was captured via 3-dimensional motion analysis, and kinematic and kinetic variables were recorded. A Low Back Stress Index was used to estimate lumbar stress as a function of pelvic acceleration at the time of maximum lateral trunk lean during the shot. Univariate analyses of covariance and logistic regression models were used to address study aims. Compared with the no-LBP group, the preexisting LBP group demonstrated 13.9% to 22.9% lower maximum angular velocities at the pelvis, trunk, and shoulders in the transverse plane (P < .05), 19.3% less collective pelvis-shoulder rotation in the transverse plane (P = .015), and 4.5% more knee flexion excursion (P = .063). The developed-LBP group produced 2.3% to 11.1% higher angular velocities in the pelvis, trunk, and shoulder and generated maximum pelvic acceleration values 36% to 42% higher than the remaining groups (P < .05 for both). Mean Low Back Stress Index values were not statistically significant among the groups (no LBP: 12,504 ± 13,076 deg2/s2; preexisting LBP: 8808 ± 10,174 deg2/s2; developed LBP: 19,389 ± 13,590 deg2/s2; P = .157). Preexisting LBP was associated with significantly restricted motion of the pelvis, trunk, and shoulders during a lacrosse shot. Excessive pelvic acceleration may be related to the development of LBP in lacrosse players.