Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Research Articles

Incidence of low anterior resection syndrome and its association with the quality of life in patients with lower rectal tumors.

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) causes devastating symptoms and impairs the quality of life (QOL). This study investigated the incidence and risk factors of LARS and their association with the QOL in patients with lower rectal tumors. Patients who underwent anus-preserving surgery for lower rectal tumors between 2014 and 2019 and who had anal defecation between 2020 and 2021 were surveyed. The LARS score measured severity, and the QOL was evaluated using the Japanese version of the Fecal Incontinence Quality-of-Life Scale (JFIQL). The primary endpoint was the incidence of Major LARS, and the secondary endpoints were risk factors and association with the JFIQL. Of 107 eligible patients, 82 (76.6%) completed the LARS survey. The incidence of Major LARS was 48%. Independent risk factors included neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and a short interval (< 24months after surgery; odds ratio, 4.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.1-19, both). The LARS score was moderately correlated with the JFIQL generic score (correlation coefficient: - 0.54). The JFIQL scores were significantly worse in the Minor and Major LARS groups than in the No LARS group. Major LARS was found in 48% of lower rectal tumors, and independent risk factors include neoadjuvant CRT and a short interval. The QOL was significantly impaired in patients with both Minor and Major LARS.

Long-term Changes in Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Survivors of Rectal Cancer: Longitudinal Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Postoperative bowel dysfunction, also known as low anterior resection syndrome, is common in rectal cancer survivors and significantly impacts quality of life. Although long-term longitudinal follow-up is lacking, improvement of the syndrome is commonly believed to happen only within the first 2 years. This study aimed to depict the longitudinal evolvement of low anterior resection syndrome beyond 3 years and explore factors associated with changes. Longitudinal long-term follow-ups were performed for the single center with the largest cohort within the multicenter FOWARC randomized controlled trial. A quaternary referral center. Individuals diagnosed with rectal cancer who received long-course neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, followed by sphincter-preserving radical proctectomy. Change of low anterior resection syndrome score and stoma status. Of the 220 patients responding to the first follow-up at a median of 39 months, 178 (80.9%) responded to the second follow-up after a median of 83 months. During this interval, the mean low anterior resection syndrome score improved from 29.5 (95% CI, 28.3-30.7) to 18.6 (95% CI, 16.6-20.6). Fifty-six (31.5%) patients reported improvement from major to no/minor severity, and 6 (3.4%) patients had new stomas because of severe bowel dysfunction. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy ( p = 0.016) was independently and negatively associated with improvement of the score. Loss of follow-up during the long-term follow-ups. Most rectal cancer survivors with low anterior resection syndrome continued to improve beyond 3 years after proctectomy. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy was negatively associated with long-term improvement of low anterior resection syndrome. See Video Abstract . ANTECEDENTES:La disfunción intestinal posoperatoria, también conocida como síndrome de resección anterior baja, es común en los sobrevivientes de cáncer de recto y afecta significativamente la calidad de vida. Aunque falta un seguimiento longitudinal a largo plazo, comúnmente se cree que la mejoría del síndrome ocurre sólo dentro de los primeros dos años.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tiene como objetivo representar la evolución longitudinal del síndrome de resección anterior baja más allá de los 3 años y explora los factores asociados con el cambio.DISEÑO:Se realizaron seguimientos longitudinales a largo plazo para el único centro con la cohorte más grande dentro del ensayo controlado aleatorio multicéntrico FOWARC.AJUSTE:Un centro de referencia cuaternario.PACIENTES:Individuos diagnosticados con cáncer de recto que recibieron quimioterapia neoadyuvante de larga duración o quimiorradioterapia, seguida de proctectomía radical con preservación del esfínter.PRINCIPALES MEDICIONES DE RESULTADO:Cambio en la puntuación del síndrome de resección anterior baja y el estado del estoma.RESULTADOS:De los 220 pacientes que respondieron al primer seguimiento con una mediana de 39 meses, 178 (80,9%) respondieron al segundo seguimiento después de una mediana de 83 meses. Durante el intervalo, la puntuación media del síndrome de resección anterior baja mejoró de 29,5 (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 28,3-30,7) a 18,6 (IC del 95%: 16,6-20,6). 56 (31,5%) pacientes informaron una mejoría de mayor a ninguna gravedad, y 6 (3,4%) pacientes tuvieron un nuevo estoma debido a una disfunción intestinal grave. La radiación neoadyuvante (p = 0,016) se asoció de forma independiente y negativa con la mejora de la puntuación.LIMITACIONES:Pérdida de seguimiento durante los seguimientos a largo plazo.CONCLUSIÓN:La mayoría de los sobrevivientes de cáncer de recto con síndrome de resección anterior baja continuaron mejorando más allá de los 3 años después de la proctectomía. La radiación neoadyuvante se asoció negativamente con la mejora a largo plazo del síndrome de resección anterior baja. (Traducción-Dr Yolanda Colorado ).

To explore the pathogenesis of anterior resection syndrome by magnetic resonance imaging rectal defecography.

Over 90% of rectal cancer patients develop low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after sphincter-preserving resection. The current globally recognized evaluation method has many drawbacks and its subjectivity is too strong, which hinders the research and treatment of LARS. To evaluate the anorectal function after colorectal cancer surgery by quantifying the index of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) defecography, and pathogenesis of LARS. We evaluated 34 patients using the standard LARS score, and a new LARS evaluation index was established using the dynamic images of MRI defecography to verify the LARS score. In the LARS score model, there were 10 (29.41%) mild and 24 (70.58%) severe cases of LARS. The comparison of defecation rate between the two groups was 29.36 ± 14.17% versus 46.83 ± 18.62% (P = 0.004); and MRI-rectal compliance (MRI-RC) score was 3.63 ± 1.96 versus 7.0 ± 3.21 (P = 0.001). Severe and mild LARS had significant differences using the two evaluation methods. There was a significant negative correlation between LARS and MRI-RC score (P < 0.001), and they had a negative correlation with defecation rate (P = 0.028). MRI defecography and standard LARS score can both be used as an evaluation index to study the pathogenesis of LARS.

SWOG S1820: A pilot randomized trial of the Altering Intake, Managing Bowel Symptoms Interventionin Survivors of Rectal Cancer.

Survivors of rectal cancer experience persistent bowel dysfunction after treatments. Dietary interventions may be an effective approach for symptom management and posttreatment diet quality. SWOG S1820 was a pilot randomized trial of the Altering Intake, Managing Symptoms in Rectal Cancer (AIMS-RC) intervention for bowel dysfunction in survivors of rectal cancer. Ninety-three posttreatment survivors were randomized to the AIMS-RC group (N=47) or the Healthy Living Education attention control group (N=46) after informed consent and completion of a prerandomization run-in. Outcome measures were completed at baseline and at 18 and 26weeks postrandomization. The primary end point was total bowel function score, and exploratory end points included low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score, quality of life, dietary quality, motivation, self-efficacy, and positive/negative affect. Most participants were White and college educated, with a mean age of 55.2years and median time since surgery of 13.1months. There were no statistically significant differences in total bowel function score by group, with the AIMS-RC group demonstrating statistically significant improvements in the exploratory end points of LARS (p=.01) and the frequency subscale of the bowel function index (p=.03). The AIMS-RC group reported significantly higher acceptability of the study. SWOG S1820 did not provide evidence of benefit from the AIMS-RC intervention relative to the attention control. Select secondary end points did demonstrate improvements. The study was highly feasible and acceptable for participants in the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program. Findings provide strong support for further refinement and effectiveness testing of the AIMS-RC intervention.

The effect of robotic surgery on low anterior resection syndrome in patients with lower rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

BackgroundMany patients experience anorectal dysfunction after rectal surgery, which is known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Robotic systems have many technical advantages that may be suitable for functional preservation after low rectal resection. Thus, the study aimed to explore whether robotic surgery can reduce the incidence and severity of LARS.MethodsPatients undergoing minimally invasive sphincter-sparing surgery for low rectal cancer were enrolled between January 2015 and December 2020. The patients were divided into robotic or laparoscopic groups. The LARS survey was conducted at 6, 12 and 18 months postoperatively. Major LARS scores were analysed as the primary endpoint. In order to reduce confounding factors, one-to-two propensity score matches were used.ResultsIn total, 342 patients were enrolled in the study. At 18 months postoperatively, the incidence of LARS was 68.7% (235/342); minor LARS was identified in 112/342 patients (32.7%), and major LARS in 123/342 (36.0%). After matching, the robotic group included 74 patients, and the laparoscopic group included 148 patients. The incidence of major LARS in the robotic group was significantly lower than that in the laparoscopic group at 6, 12, and 18 months after surgery. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, tumour location, laparoscopic surgery, intersphincteric resection, neoadjuvant therapy, and anastomotic leakage were independent risk factors for major LARS after minimally invasive sphincter-sparing surgery for low rectal cancer. Furthermore, a major LARS prediction model was constructed. Results of model evaluation showed that the nomogram had good prediction accuracy and efficiency.ConclusionsPatients with low rectal cancer may benefit from robotic surgery to reduce the incidence and severity of LARS. Our nomogram could aid surgeons in setting an individualized treatment program for low rectal cancer patients.

Low anterior resection syndrome: where are we now?

The ACPN details some of the key insights from the low anterior resection syndrome plenary session that took place at the ACPGBI conference in Manchester, 2023

Association between personality types and low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer patients following surgery.

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) has had many impacts on the lives of patients and substantial differences in emotional and social functions. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation analysis of different personality traits in rectal cancer patients with LARS after undergoing curative surgery. This study was designed as a prospective cohort study. The inclusion criteria included (1) participants diagnosed with rectal cancer who underwent surgical resection of malignant tumors and (2) ECOG 0-1. The primary outcome was the correlation between different personality traits and low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer patients after radical surgery. Low anterior resection syndrome incidence rates were estimated by questionnaires and personality groups by the Type A and Type D Scale-14 Personality Inventory. For all 161 participants in this study, the presence of a tumor at the lower anal verge and the receipt of neoadjuvant CCRT had a statistically significant positive correlation with the LARS score at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year (Pearson correlation coefficient = -0.283, -0.374, and - 0.205, respectively), with a p value of less than 0.05. Personalities with Type A, Type D, and Type D-SI scores had a statistically significant positive correlation with LARS score at 1 month (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.172, 0.162, and 0,164, p value = 0.03, 0.04, and 0.04). Type A and Type D personalities are highly linked to LARS. Personalized support approaches can ultimately assist rectal cancer patients in overcoming difficulties after surgery and recovery and enhance their functional outcomes.

Watch and Wait for Rectal Cancer

About one third of all colorectal carcinomas (CRC) are localised in the rectum. As part of a multimodal therapy concept, neoadjuvant therapy achieves downstaging of the tumour in 50-60% of cases and a so-called complete clinical response (cCR), defined as clinically (and radiologically) undetectable residual tumour after completion of neoadjuvant therapy, in 10-30% of cases.In view of the perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with radical rectal resection, including the occurrence of a symptom complex known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and the need for deviation, at least temporarily, the question of the risk-benefit balance of organ resection in the presence of cCR has been raised. In this context, the therapeutic concept of a "watch-and-wait" approach with omission of immediate organ resection and inclusion in a structured surveillance regime, has emerged.For a safe, oncological implementation of this option, it is necessary to develop standards in the definition of a suitable patient clientele and the implementation of the concept. In addition to the initial correct selection of the patient group that is suitable for a primarily non-surgical procedure, the inherent goal is the early and sufficient detection of tumour recurrence (so-called local regrowth) during the "watch-and-wait" phase (surveillance).In this context, in this paper we address the questions of: 1. the optimal timing of initial re-staging, 2. the criteria for assessing the clinical response and selecting the appropriate patient clientele, 3. the rhythm and design of the surveillance protocol.

Analysis of the incidence and symptomatology of low anterior resection syndrome after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer

Objective: This study aims to explore the temporal trend of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) and its symptoms after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer. Methods: A retrospective cohort study design was employed. The study included primary rectal (adenocarcinoma) cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic anterior resection at Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020. Complete medical records and follow-up data at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postoperatively were available for all patients. A total of 1454 patients were included, of whom 1094 (75.2%) were aged ≤65 years, and 597 (41.1%) were females. Among them, 1040 cases (71.5%) had an anastomosis-to-anus distance of 0-5cm, and 86 cases (5.9%) received neoadjuvant treatment. All patients completed the Chinese version of the LARS questionnaire and their LARS occurrence and specific symptom information were recorded at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. Considering past literature and clinical experience, further subgroup analyses were performed to explore the potential impact factors on severe LARS, including anastomosis level, preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, postoperative adjuvant therapy, and the presence of preventive stoma. Results: The occurrence rates of LARS at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months postoperatively were 78.5% (1142/1454), 71.4% (1038/1454), 55.0% (799/1454), 45.7% (664/1454), and 45.7% (664/1454), respectively (χ2=546.180, P<0.001). No statistically significant difference was observed between the 12-month and 18-month time points (P>0.05). When compared with the symptoms at 3 months, the occurrence rates of gas incontinence [1.7% (24/1454) vs. 33.9% (493/1454)], liquid stool incontinence [3.9% (56/1454) vs. 41.9% (609/1454)], increased stool frequency [79.6% (1158/1454) vs. 95.9% (1395/1454)], stool clustering [74.3% (1081/1454) vs. 92.9% (1351/1454)], and stool urgency [46.5% (676/1454) vs. 78.7% (1144/1454)] in the LARS symptom spectrum were significantly alleviated at 12 months (all P<0.05) and remained stable beyond 12 months (all P>0.05). With the extension of postoperative time, the incidence rates of severe LARS exhibited a decreasing trend in different subgroups, of anastomosis level, preoperative neoadjuvant therapy, postoperative adjuvant therapy, and the presence of preventive stoma, and reached stability at 12 months postoperatively (all P>0.05). Conclusion: LARS and its specific symptom profile showed a trend of gradual improvement over time up to 1 year postoperatively, and stabilized after more than 1 year. Increased stool frequency and stool clustering are the most common features of abnormal bowel dys function, which improve slowly after surgery.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome following Trans-Anal Total Mesorectal Excision.

Trans-anal total mesorectal excision (Ta-TME) is a novel approach for the resection of rectal cancer. Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a frequent functional disorder that might follow restorative proctectomy. Data regarding bowel function after Ta-TME are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for the development of LARS following Ta-TME. A prospectively maintained database of all patients who underwent Ta-TME for rectal cancer at our institution was reviewed. All patients who were operated on from January 2018 to December 2021 were evaluated. The LARS score questionnaire was used via telephone interviews. Incidence, severity and risk factors for LARS were evaluated. Eighty-five patients underwent Ta-TME for rectal cancer between January 2018 and December 2021. Thirty-five patients were excluded due to ostomy status, death, local disease recurrence, ileal pouch or lack of compliance. Fifty patients were included in the analysis. LARS was diagnosed in 76% of patients. Anastomosis distance from dentate line was identified as a risk factor for LARS via multivariate analysis (p = 0.042). Neo-adjuvant therapy, hand sewn anastomosis and anastomotic leak did not increase the risk of LARS. LARS is a frequent condition following ta-TME, as it is used for other approaches to low anterior resection. Anastomosis distance from dentate line is an independent risk factor for LARS. In this study neo-adjuvant therapy, hand sewn anastomosis and anastomotic leak did not increase the risk of LARS. Further studies with longer follow-up times are required to better understand the functional outcomes following Ta-TME.

Long term persistence and risk factors for anorectal symptoms following low anterior resection for rectal cancer

BackgroundRectal cancer is commonly treated by chemoradiation therapy, followed by the low anterior resection anal sphincter-preserving surgery, with a temporary protecting ileostomy. After reversal of the stoma a condition known as low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) can occur characterized by a combination of symptoms such as urgent bowel movements, lack of control over bowel movements, and difficulty fully emptying the bowels. These symptoms have a significant negative impact on the quality of life for individuals who have survived the cancer. Currently, there is limited available data regarding the presence, risk factors, and effects of treatment for these symptoms during long-term follow-up.AimsTo evaluate long term outcomes of low anterior resection surgery and its correlation to baseline anorectal manometry (ARM) parameters and physiotherapy with anorectal biofeedback (BF) treatment.MethodsOne hundred fifteen patients (74 males, age 63 ± 11) who underwent low anterior resection surgery for rectal cancer were included in the study. Following surgery, patients were managed by surgical and oncologic team, with more symptomatic LARS patients referred for further evaluation and treatment by gastroenterologists. At follow up, patients were contacted and offered participation in a long term follow up by answering symptom severity and quality of life (QOL) questionnaires.Results80 (70%) patients agreed to participate in the long term follow up study (median 4 years from stoma reversal, range 1–8). Mean time from surgery to stoma closure was 6 ± 4 months. At long term follow up, mean LARS score was 30 (SD 11), with 55 (69%) patients classified as major LARS (score > 30). Presence of major LARS was associated with longer time from surgery to stoma reversal (6.8 vs. 4.8 months; p = 0.03) and with adjuvant chemotherapy (38% vs. 8%; p = 0.01). Patients initially referred for ARM and BF were more likely to suffer from major LARS at long term follow up (64% vs. 16%, p < 0.001). In the subgroup of patients who underwent perioperative ARM (n = 36), higher maximal squeeze pressure, higher maximal incremental squeeze pressure and higher rectal pressure on push were all associated with better long-term outcomes of QOL parameters (p < 0.05 for all). 21(54%) of patients referred to ARM were treated with BF, but long term outcomes for these patients were not different from those who did not perform BF.ConclusionsA significant number of patients continue to experience severe symptoms and a decline in their quality of life even 4 years after undergoing low anterior resection surgery. Prolonged time until stoma reversal and adjuvant chemotherapy emerged as the primary risk factors for a negative prognosis. It is important to note that referring patients for anorectal physiology testing alone tended to predict poorer long-term outcomes, indicating the presence of selection bias. However, certain measurable manometric parameters could potentially aid in identifying patients who are at a higher risk of experiencing unfavorable functional outcomes. There is a critical need to enhance current treatment options for this patient group.

Consistency between POLARS and LARS scores regarding the incidence of low anterior resection syndrome in a Chilean population undergoing rectal surgery secondary to cancer in a high-volume hospital.

The aim of this work was to evaluate the concordance between the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) and preoperative LARS (POLARS) scores regarding the incidence of LARS in a Chilean population undergoing rectal surgery for cancer in a high-volume hospital. The LARS score questionnaire, following telephone requests, was used to determine the presence and severity of LARS. The POLARS score was calculated based on variables described previously. Correlations and qualitative and quantitative concordance were evaluated using Spearman's correlation coefficient, the kappa coefficient and the Bland-Altman plot with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. A total of 120 patients met the inclusion criteria: 37.5% underwent neoadjuvant radiotherapy, 61% underwent total mesorectal excision (TME) and 51.6% underwent ostomy. A total of 49% of patients did not present with LARS, whereas 28% had major LARS. The correlation between scales was poor, with a fair qualitative concordance to determine the presence/absence of LARS and a slight qualitative concordance to determine the degree of the intensity. The quantitative concordance was poor. In the Chilean population, concordance between the LARS and POLARS scores was qualitatively fair to determine the presence/absence of the disease and qualitatively slight to determine the degree of intensity. We do not suggest using the POLARS score in the perioperative period in the Chilean population deliberately, as the score may help to determine the presence/absence of LARS but cannot determine its degree of intensity. Additional evaluations are required to determine the factors contributing to the degree of agreement between the scales.

Influence of colorectal anastomotic leakage on time before the loop stoma closing

Background. Important task is determining the long-term consequences of colorectal anastomotic leakage. Leakage with clinical manifestations leads to a higher frequency of local recurrences of rectal cancer and increases the severity of manifestations of low anterior resection syndrome. How does the leakage of colorectal anastomosis affect the period before the closure of loop stoma?Aim. To determine the influence of anastomotic leakage on the term before closing the ileostomy.Methods. In this retrospective incomparable study were included 618 patients with rectal cancer who had been underwent anterior or low anterior resection with formation colorectal anastomosis and loop stoma.Results. Colorectal anastomotic leakage was detected in 86 from 618 patients (13.9 %). The loop stoma was closed in 513 from 618 (83 %) patients. The time to the preventive stoma closure in patients with anastomotic leakage was significantly higher than in patients without anastomotic leakage, p = 0.001. Reconstructive surgery in patients without anastomotic leakage was performed in 9 months after anterior resection. The median time before the stoma closure of patients with X – ray anastomosis leakage was 11 months, with clinical leakage – 17 months, p &lt;0.001.Conclusion. Colorectal anastomotic leakage statistically increases the term before ileostomy closure.

Incidence and risk factors of bowel dysfunction after minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery and discrepancies between the Wexner score and the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score.

Bowel dysfunction after sphincter-preserving-surgery (SPS) impacts quality of life. The Wexner score (WS) and the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score (LS) are instruments for assessing postoperative bowel dysfunction. We analyzed the incidence of and risk factors for each symptom and examined the discrepancies between the two scores. A total of 142 patients with rectal cancer, who underwent minimally invasive SPS between May, 2018 and July, 2019, were included. A questionnaire survey using the two scores was given to the patients 2years after SPS. Tumor location and preoperative radiotherapy were independent risk factors for major LARS. Intersphincteric resection with a hand-sewn anastomosis (HSA) was an independent risk factor for high WS. Among the patients who underwent HSA, 82% experienced incontinence for liquid stools, needed to wear pads, and suffered lifestyle alterations. Of the 35 patients with minor LARS, only 1 had a high WS, and 80.0% reported no lifestyle alterations. Among the 75 patients with major LARS, 58.7% had a low WS and 21.3% reported no lifestyle alterations. The results of this study provide practical data to help patients understand potential bowel dysfunction after SPS. The discrepancies between the WS and LS were clarified, and further efforts are required to utilize these scores in clinical practice.

Impact of pelvic floor muscle training on sphincter function and quality-of-life in patients who underwent low anterior resection: A comparative evaluation.

Our study aimed to determine the impact of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) on sphincter function and overall well-being in patients who underwent low anterior resection (LAR) and diverting ileostomy due to rectal cancer. For this purpose, anal electromyography (aEMG), low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life questionnaires (EORTC-QLQ)-C30 (generic for cancer) and CR29 (specific to colorectal cancer) were used. The primary endpoint of our study is to determine the effect of PFMT on sphincter function by aEMG, the secondary endpoint is to evaluate the effect on quality-of-life using the LARS score, EORTC-QLQ-C30 and CR-29 questionnaires. Conducted between January 2017 and April 2018 at a tertiary hospital's general surgery clinic, the study included 32 patients between the ages of 18 and 75 who underwent low anterior resection and diverting ileostomy surgery. The patients were divided into two: the Study Group (SG), which started PFMT after surgery, and the Control Group (CG), which was not subjected to additional exercises. Six months after closure of the diverting ileostomy, both groups were evaluated with aEMG, LARS scores, and EORTC-QLQ-C30 and CR-29. aEMG duration values were significantly lower in the SG (17.6 m/sec vs. 19.9 m/sec; p=0.001). Additionally, a significant decrease in SG, major LARS rates (12.5% vs. 62.5%; p=0.004) and LARS scores (23.1 vs. 30.0; p=0.003) was observed. While there was no significant difference between the groups in EORTC-QLQ C30, increased sexual interest and decreased fecal incontinence were observed in SG in EORTC-QLQ-CR29. PFMT significantly improves LARS scores, quality-of-life questionnaires and aEMG parameters, positioning PFMT as an accessible, non-invasive, easy-to-use first-line treatment option in the treatment of LARS.

Factors affecting quality of life in rectal cancer survivors who have undergone laparoscopic surgery: patient-reported outcomes over 10 years at a single institution.

Colorectal cancer survivors have many problems affecting their quality of life (QOL). Traditional follow-up focuses on the detection of recurrence rather than QOL. Efforts are being made to assess patient-reported outcomes (PROMS) more formally. Such changes may enable patients to consider QOL factors when deciding on treatment. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer between 2005 and 2015 at a single institution were identified and sent European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 QOL questionnaires. QOL and the impact of radiotherapy, chemotherapy and formation of end colostomy were assessed. Some 141 patients were identified: 12 died and 118 (83.7%) responded, of whom 101 completed the questionnaires and 17 declined to participate; 11 were lost to follow-up. Mean age was 67 years, median follow-up was 58 months. Median QOL score was 6 (maximum 7) and 4.5% of patients reported a poor QOL score (<4). Significant rectal/perianal pain, sexual dysfunction and urinary symptoms were reported in 3.6%, 10.9% and 2.7% of respondents, respectively. Significant differences between treatment groups were uncommon. All cohorts reported similar QOL, functional and symptom scores. These results compare favourably with the published data. Future studies may benefit from baseline assessment to better assess treatment impact, prescient in an increasingly elderly and comorbid population. This paper establishes that good PROMs are achievable with laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. It identifies limited differences in QOL between treatment modalities. Restoration of intestinal continuity and end colostomy result in similar QOL. This may address common concerns regarding stomata, sexual function and low anterior resection syndrome in this cohort.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin for mid-low locally advanced rectal cancer with negative mesorectal fascia: Long-term outcomes of a prospective trial (PKUCH-R03 trial).

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in mid-low locally advanced rectal cancer with negative mesorectal fascia (MRF). This prospective, single-arm phase II trial was designed and conducted at Peking University Cancer Hospital. The patients who provided consent received 3 months of NCT (capecitabine and oxaliplatin, CapOX) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). The primary endpoint was the rate of pathological complete response (pCR). From January 2019 through December 2021, a total of 53 patients were enrolled, 7.5% of whom experienced grade 3-4 adverse events during NCT. The pCR rate was 17.0% for the entire cohort, and the overall rate of postoperative complications was 37.7% (1.9% of grade IIIa patients). The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 91.4%, and 23.5% (12/51) of the patients suffered from major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). Postoperative complications were independently associated with major LARS. For patients with mid-low rectal cancer with negative MRF, 3 months of NCT were found to yield a favorable tumor response with acceptable toxicity. With fair long-term survival, the NCT regimen could be associated with low rates of perioperative complications as well as acceptable anal function.

Application of electroacupuncture in the prevention of low anterior resection syndrome after rectal cancer surgery.

Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is one of the common postoperative complications in patients with rectal cancer, which seriously affects their postoperative recovery and quality of life (QoL). Electroacupuncture therapy is one of the characteristic therapies of traditional Chinese medicine. There are few reports on the prevention and treatment of LARS by electroacupuncture therapy. To explore the clinical effectiveness of electroacupuncture in managing rectal cancer patients with postoperative LARS. A total of 50 patients with LARS after rectal cancer surgery were retrospectively selected as the research subjects. According to the treatment methods, they were divided into an observation group (n = 25) and a control group (n = 25). During the four-week treatment period, the control group received standard defecation function training, while the observation group received electroacupuncture care and traditional defecation function training. The anal pressure index (which includes anal resting pressure, anal systolic pressure, and maximum tolerable volume), European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QoL C30 (QLQ-C30) score, LARS Scale (LARSS) score, Wexner anal incontinence scale score, Xu Zhongfa five-item 10-point scale score, and the occurrence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. The experimental group showed considerably enhanced LARSS scores compared to those in the control group after four weeks of treatment. In the first week, second week, and fourth week, the LARSS score and Wexner anal incontinence scale score decreased, and the Xu Zhong method five-item 10-point scale score increased, with significant differences (P < 0.05). The experimental group showed substantial improvements in anal resting pressure, anal systolic pressure, and maximum tolerance volume after undergoing 4 wk of therapy in the untreated group (P < 0.05). The experimental group's QLQ-C30 score on the EORTC QoL questionnaire was higher than that of the control group during the 1st, 2nd, and 4th wk (P < 0.05). No significant variation between the groups in the frequency of adverse reactions (P > 0.05) was observed. Electroacupuncture positively impacted LARS following rectal cancer surgery, effectively improving clinical symptoms and anal pressure indicators and patients' standard of life.

Major low anterior resection syndrome has equivalent health-related quality of life implications as having a permanent colostomy.

The literature is inconclusive when comparing health-related quality of life following restorative anterior resection (AR) compared with abdominoperineal resection (APR). Consideration of functional outcomes may explain this inconsistency. The aim of this study was to compare health-related quality of life in patients post-anterior resection, stratified by low anterior resection syndrome score, and post-abdominoperineal resection patients. A cross-sectional study of consecutive patients post APR and AR for rectal or sigmoid adenocarcinoma at a tertiary centre in Sydney, Australia (Jan 2012- Dec 2021) was performed. HRQoL outcomes (SF36v2 physical [PCS] and mental component summary [MCS] scores) were compared between APR and AR patients, with subgroup analyses stratifying AR patients according to LARS score (no/minor/major). Age- and gender-adjusted comparisons were performed by linear regression. Overall, 248 post-AR patients (57.3% male, meanage 70.8years, SD 11.6) and 64 post-APR patients (62.5% male, mean age68.1years, SD 13.1)participated. When stratified by LARS, 'major LARS' had a similar negative effect on age-and sex-adjusted PCS scores as APR. 'No LARS' (p < 0.001) and 'minor LARS' (p < 0.001) patients had higher PCS scores compared to post-APR patients. 'Major LARS' had a similarly negative effect on MCS scores compared with post-APR patients. MCS scores were higher in 'no LARS' (p = 0.006) compared with APR patients. Postoperative bowel dysfunction significantly impacts health-related quality of life. Patients with 'major LARS' have health-related quality of life as poor as those following APR. This requires consideration when counselling patients on postoperative health-related quality of life, especially where poor postoperative bowel function is anticipated following restorative surgery.

Major Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) and Quality of Life in Patients With Low Rectal Cancer: A Preoperative Survey Using LARS Score and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer’s 30-Item Core Quality of Life Questionnaire

Major Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) and Quality of Life in Patients With Low Rectal Cancer: A Preoperative Survey Using LARS Score and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer’s 30-Item Core Quality of Life Questionnaire