Low Annualized Bleeding Rates Research Articles

Real-world usage and effectiveness of recombinant factor VIII/factor IX Fc in hemophilia A/B: final data from the 24-month, prospective, noninterventional PREVENT study in Germany

BackgroundReal-world experience with efmoroctocog alfa (a recombinant factor [F]VIII Fc [rFVIIIFc])/eftrenonacog alfa (recombinant factor IX Fc [rFIXFc]) is needed to bridge evidence gaps. ObjectivesTo describe rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc usage and effectiveness over a 24-month prospective period. MethodsPREVENT (NCT03055611), a noninterventional study across 25 German hemophilia treatment centers, enrolled previously treated persons with hemophilia A/B (all ages/severities) on individualized rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis before/at enrollment. Primary endpoints included annualized bleeding rate (ABR), injection frequency (IF), and factor consumption. Additionally, up to 12 months of retrospective FVIII/FIX data were collected. Physician/patient satisfaction and safety outcomes were assessed. ResultsOverall, 47 of 150 patients received ≥1 rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc dose with median prospective follow-up of 20.6/21.0 months, respectively. rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc demonstrated low median ABR (0.5/1.7), annualized IF (121.8/52.2 injections/y), and FC (4611.7/2423.9 IU/kg) in line with product labels. Compared with previous FVIII/FIX, there was a 56.0% reduction in ABR for rFVIIIFc (rate ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.31-0.64), with no change for rFIXFc (rate ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-1.31); rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc reduced annualized IF (rFVIIIFc, mean difference, −31.7; 95% CI, −40.3 to −23.1; rFIXFc, mean difference, −37.3; 95% CI, −46.9 to −27.8), while FC remained stable (rFVIIIFc, +374.1; 95% CI, +46.8 to +701.3; rFIXFc, +503.9; 95% CI, +95.4 to +912.4). Most physicians/patients were satisfied/highly satisfied with rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc. rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc were well tolerated, with no inhibitor development or treatment-related serious adverse events. ConclusionReal-world PREVENT data complement phase 3 trials and show that individualized rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc prophylaxis provided stable bleed protection with low IF and maintained FC. Compared with previous FVIII, ABR was considerably reduced with rFVIIIFc, with stable annualized FC. For rFIXFc, bleed protection was maintained vs previous FIX while reducing annualized IF.

Nonacog beta pegol prophylaxis in children with hemophilia B: safety, efficacy, and neurodevelopmental outcomes for up to 8 years

BackgroundNonacog beta pegol (N9-GP) is an extended half-life PEGylated factor (F)IX product with established efficacy and short-term safety in persons with hemophilia B (HB). Long-term safety has been evaluated for polyethylene glycol exposure but not N9-GP. ObjectivesTo assess safety, neurodevelopmental, and efficacy outcomes of children with HB receiving N9-GP prophylaxis across 2 open-label, single-arm, phase 3 studies: paradigm5 (previously treated patients [PTPs]) and paradigm6 (previously untreated patients [PUPs]) in this interim analysis. MethodsPTPs (aged ≤12 years) and PUPs (aged <6 years) with severe/moderate (≤2% FIX level) HB were recruited to N9-GP prophylaxis (40 IU/kg once weekly) in paradigm5 and paradigm6, respectively. Safety assessments included FIX inhibitor incidence, adverse events, neurocognitive and neurologic outcomes, polyethylene glycol concentration in plasma, and medical events of special interest. Efficacy endpoints included bleeds, N9-GP hemostatic effect, and FIX consumption. ResultsOverall, 25 patients in paradigm5 and 50 patients in paradigm6 received N9-GP and were followed for up to 8 and 6 years, respectively. No inhibitory antibodies were reported in PTPs; 4 of the 50 PUPs developed inhibitors. Extensive evaluation revealed no neurocognitive or neurologic concerns with N9-GP use in children during the study period. Across both studies, few adverse events were reported as possibly related to N9-GP. High hemostatic response rate, high treatment adherence, low annualized bleeding rates, and no new target joints were reported. ConclusionThese data provide the longest follow-up for an extended half-life FIX and confirm the long-term efficacy of N9-GP prophylaxis in children with HB with no observed neurocognitive or neurologic safety concerns.

Adult People with Hemophilia A Have Low Annualized Bleeding Rate, However the Arthropathy Remains a Burden: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Adult People with Hemophilia A Have Low Annualized Bleeding Rate, However the Arthropathy Remains a Burden: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Bleeding Outcomes in Participants with Factor VIII Activity &amp;lt;5 IU/DL Post-Gene Transfer in GENEr8-1

Background: Valoctocogene roxaparvovec is expected to transfer a functional FVIII coding sequence that would eliminate the need for regular prophylaxis for people with severe hemophilia A (HA). At the same valoctocogene roxaparvovec dose, FVIII levels varied among participants in the phase 3 GENEr8-1 trial. The protective effect of low transgene-derived FVIII is unknown. Aim: To determine clinical outcomes for participants with low FVIII activity 3 years post-gene transfer in GENEr8-1. Methods: In the open-label, single-arm, phase 3 GENEr8-1 trial (NCT03370913), 134 adult males (intention-to-treat [ITT] population) with severe HA (FVIII activity &amp;lt;1 IU/dL) previously receiving regular FVIII prophylaxis and with no history of FVIII inhibitors received a single dose of 6x10 13 vg/kg valoctocogene roxaparvovec. Plasma FVIII activity was measured via chromogenic substrate assay (reported in text; lower limit of quantitation [LLOQ], 1.5 [previously 3.0] IU/dL) or one-stage assay (LLOQ, 1.0 IU/dL). For participants who resumed prophylaxis, the valid FVIII measurement closest to, but not after, return to prophylaxis (RTP) is reported. Presented FVIII activity at a visit week is the median value in the 4- or 6-week window around the target date. Week 156 FVIII activity was imputed as 0 for participants who discontinued; other missing FVIII measurements were imputed as the smaller of valid values immediately prior to or post week 156. Bleeds were self-reported during baseline and after cessation of regular FVIII prophylaxis (scheduled for week 4 post-infusion). RTP was defined per-protocol as usual FVIII prophylaxis administered ≥1 time/week for ≥4 consecutive weeks or ≥2 emicizumab injections/month. Outcomes are reported for up to 156 weeks. Results: Of 134 ITT participants, 131 completed the week 156 visit. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) FVIII activity at week 156 was 18.2 (30.6) IU/dL in the ITT population. At week 156, 46 of 134 (34.3%) ITT participants had median FVIII activity &amp;lt;5 IU/dL (range, 0 to 4.9 IU/dL). These 46 participants had annualized bleeding rate (ABR) for treated spontaneous and traumatic bleeds at baseline between 0 and 27.5 (mean, 4.8) bleeds/year and from post-prophylaxis to week 156 between 0 and 12.0 (mean, 1.7) bleeds/year. Of these 46 participants, 8 resumed prophylaxis before week 156 (range, 58-141 weeks; Figure 1) and 38 did not RTP before week 156 ( Figure 2). The 8 participants who resumed prophylaxis had FVIII activity between &amp;lt;1.5 and 4.5 IU/dL proximal to RTP; the 38 who did not RTP had median FVIII activity between 0 and 4.9 IU/dL at week 156. At week 156, 3 of 8 and 15 of 38 participants who did and did not RTP had FVIII of 0 IU/dL, respectively. For the 8 participants who resumed prophylaxis before week 156, baseline ABR for treated bleeds ranged from 0.0 to 22.0 (mean, 8.5) bleeds/year, compared with 0 to 27.5 (mean, 4.0) bleeds/year for the 38 participants who did not RTP before week 156. Treated ABR from post-prophylaxis to RTP ranged from 0.9 to 13.4 (mean, 4.8) bleeds/year for the 8 participants who resumed prophylaxis before week 156, compared with 0 to 12.0 (mean, 1.0) bleeds/year from post-prophylaxis to week 156 for the 38 participants who did not RTP before week 156. For 2 of 8 participants who resumed prophylaxis before week 156, treated ABR was higher during the post-prophylaxis period up to RTP than at baseline; treated ABR was higher post-prophylaxis to week 156 compared with baseline for 5 of 38 participants who did not RTP before week 156. Most of the 38 participants who did not RTP before week 156 had lower ABR for treated bleeds compared with baseline, low post-prophylaxis ABRs for treated bleeds, or no substantial treated spontaneous bleeds. Decisions to not RTP were multifactorial and based on participant-investigator shared decision making; narratives outlining determinants that may have influenced decisions around prophylaxis for participants who had week 156 FVIII activity &amp;lt;5 IU/dL will be presented. Conclusions: Most participants with low FVIII activity had low bleeding rates, suggesting that low endogenous FVIII expression may provide protective hemostatic benefits. Many participants who resumed prophylaxis had clinical presentation consistent with moderate hemophilia; the individual decision to RTP was multifactorial and influenced by FVIII activity, bleeding rates, desired physical activity levels, and personal preferences.

Prophylaxis with a recombinant factor VIII Fc in hemophilia A: long-term follow-up on joint health, efficacy, and safety from phase 3 studies in children and adults

BackgroundRecurrent joint bleeds are a major cause of morbidity in severe hemophilia. Prophylaxis with efmoroctocog alfa (a recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein, [rFVIIIFc]) has demonstrated benefits beyond bleed control, including joint health maintenance. ObjectivesTo assess long-term efficacy and safety of rFVIIIFc prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A in phase 3 pivotal (A-LONG/Kids A-LONG) and extension (ASPIRE) studies. MethodsLongitudinal analysis included pooled data from A-LONG/Kids A-LONG and ASPIRE. Subgroup analyses investigated outcomes in modified Hemophilia Joint Health Score or Hemophilia Joint Health Score and target joints in subjects with 4 to 5 years follow-up on individualized prophylaxis (IP), and those with the highest annualized bleeding rate (ABR) quartile during Year 1 of IP. ResultsOverall, rFVIIIFc consumption remained stable and low ABRs were maintained, with a median treatment duration of 4.2/3.4 years in subjects from A-LONG/Kids A-LONG, respectively. Median overall ABR also remained low (1.0-2.0) in subjects on IP for 4 to 5 years. Sustained improvements in modified Hemophilia Joint Health Score or Hemophilia Joint Health Score were demonstrated over a median follow-up of 3.7 years. In subjects from A-LONG/Kids A-LONG, 99.6% (n = 234)/100% (n = 9) of evaluable baseline target joints were resolved, with no recurrence in 95%/100% of target joints. In IP subjects within the highest ABR quartile in Year 1, continued improvements were observed over a median follow-up of 4.3 years in ABR and joint health, without increased factor consumption. No inhibitors or treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. ConclusionPreviously treated subjects of all ages receiving long-term prophylaxis with rFVIIIFc had sustained clinical benefits, including improved joint health and low ABR.

HTRS2023.P2.18 Pediatric persons with hemophilia A on EHL-FVIII or emicizumab prophylaxis require iron therapy despite low annualized bleeding rate

HTRS2023.P2.18 Pediatric persons with hemophilia A on EHL-FVIII or emicizumab prophylaxis require iron therapy despite low annualized bleeding rate

Post hoc longitudinal assessment of the efficacy and safety of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein in hemophilia B.

Long-term efficacy and safety of the extended half-life recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) has been established among previously treated patients with severe hemophilia B in 2 phase 3 trials (B-LONG [#NCT01027364] and Kids B-LONG [#NCT01440946]) and a long-term extension study (B-YOND [#NCT01425723]). In this study, we report post hoc analyses of pooled longitudinal data for up to 6.5 years for rFIXFc prophylaxis. In the B-LONG study, subjects ≥12 years received weekly dose-adjusted prophylaxis (WP; starting dose, 50 IU/kg), individualized interval-adjusted prophylaxis (IP;initially, 100 IU/kg every 10days), or on-demand dosing. In the Kids B-LONG study, subjects <12 years received 50 to 60 IU/kg every 7days, adjusted as needed. In the B-YOND study, subjects received WP (20-100 IU/kg every 7days), IP (100 IU/kg every 8-16days), modified prophylaxis, or on-demand dosing; switching between treatment groups was permitted. A total of 123 subjects from B-LONG and 30 from Kids B-LONG study were included, of whom 93 and 27, respectively, enrolled in the B-YOND study. The median cumulative duration of treatment was 3.63 years (range, 0.003-6.48 years) in B-LONG/B-YOND and 2.88 years (range, 0.30-4.80 years) in Kids B-LONG/B-YOND group. Annualized bleed rates (ABRs) remained low, annualized factor consumption remained stable, and adherence remained high throughout treatment. Low ABRs were also maintained in subjects with dosing intervals ≥14days or with target joints at baseline. Complete resolution of evaluable target joints and no recurrence in 90.2% of baseline target joints during follow-up were observed. rFIXFc prophylaxis was associated with sustained clinical benefits, including long-term bleed prevention and target joint resolution, for severe hemophilia B.

Baseline VWF:Ag Level and Body Mass Index Are Inverse Influencing Factors of Annualized Total Bleeding Rate and Annualized Joint Bleeding Rate Respectively in Severe-Type Adult Patients with Hemophilia a (PwHA) with Episodic Treatment with rFVIII

Introduction: Bleeding phenotypes of severe-type patients with hemophilia A (PwHA) vary greatly, which influence factor consumption and medical cost. Factors affecting bleeding patterns of PwHA include various procoagulant and anticoagulant factors, joint condition and physical activity, etc. We aimed to investigate clinical factors influencing by-nature bleeding frequency of severe-type PwHA during episodic treatment.Methods and materials: There were 19 non-inhibitor, severe-type, previously treated PwHA aged >20 years, who had at least one to five major joints arthropathy, retrospectively enrolled from two hemophilia centers for analysis. They had been refusing prophylaxis therapy with FVIII product due to heavy burden of frequent intravenous FVIII injection and had long-term episodic treatment. Clinical informations were collected from November 2017 to November 2018, including age, body mass index (BMI), body weight, ABO blood grouping, HCV and HIV infection status, baseline VWF:Ag and VWF:activity, mutation of F8 gene. Annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and annualized joint bleeding rate (AJBR), weekly doses and annualized factor consumption costs (calculated by new Taiwan dollars, NTD) were obtained from the patients' medical records.Results: The PwHA with ABR <24 had significantly lower proportion of blood-group-O patients, higher baseline VWF:Ag and VWF:activity than those with ABR >24.(P-value <0.05) The PwHA with AJBR <13 had significantly higher BMI than those with AJBR >13.(P-value <0.05) There was no significant difference in ABR, AJBR, weekly dose, and annualized factor cost between PwHA with O blood group and non-O blood group. Compared with PwHA with baseline VWF:Ag or VWF:activity <145%, those with baseline VWF:Ag or VWF:activity >145% had significantly older age (34.9 vs 53.2 years, P-value <0.05), higher BMI (25.2 vs 29.9, P-value <0.05), lower ABR (58.2 vs 12.2 per year, P-value<0.01), lower AJBR (46.8 vs 10.8 per year, P-value<0.01), lower weekly dose (42.4 vs 10.6 IU/kg/wk, P-value<0.01), and lower annualized factor consumption costs (4,177,732 vs 1,120,704 NTD, P-value<0.01). Compared with PwHA with BMI <28, those with BMI >28 had significantly lower ABR (58.2 vs 12.2 per year, P-value<0.05), lower AJBR (46.8 vs 10.8 per year, P-value<0.05), higher baseline VWF:activity (94.6% vs 190.2%, P-value <0.05), and lower weekly dose (38.5 vs 17.1 IU/kg/wk, P-value <0.05). By backward-stepwise multivariate linear regression, baseline VWF:Ag and BMI were identified as independent and significant inverse influencing factors for ABR and AJBR, respectively.(P-value <0.05)Conclusion: For severe-type adult PwHA with episodic treatment, baseline VWF:Ag or VWF:activity >145% was associated with lower ABR, AJBR, weekly dose, and annualized factor cost. BMI >28 was associated with lower ABR, AJBR, and weekly dose consumption. Baseline VWF:Ag and BMI were revealed as inverse influencing factors for ABR and AJBR, respectively. The results of our study could be useful for clinicians to have an insight into diversity of bleeding phenotypes of by-nature severe-type PwHA. For developing countries where factor concentrate resources are not enough, these clinical influencing factors might be helpful for the management of therapeutic strategies and resource allocation for severe PwHA. DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Prophylactic Treatment with Rurioctocog Alfa Pegol Results in a Dose-Dependent Normalization of Biomarkers of Joint Health in Severe Hemophilia a: An Exploratory Analysis from the Propel Study

Prophylactic Treatment with Rurioctocog Alfa Pegol Results in a Dose-Dependent Normalization of Biomarkers of Joint Health in Severe Hemophilia a: An Exploratory Analysis from the Propel Study

Factor product utilization and health outcomes in patients with haemophilia A and B on extended half-life concentrates: A Canadian observational study of real-world outcomes.

Recombinant factors VIII and IX Fc (rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc) became available in Canada in 2016 and were the only extended half-life (EHL) factor concentrates available in Canada until 2018. We aim to describe the change in product utilization in Canadians who switched to rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc. This prospective and retrospective cohort study enrolled males aged ≥6 years with moderate or severe haemophilia who switched to rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc and those who remained on standard half-life (SHL) between 2016 and 2018. Factor utilization and annualized bleeding rates (ABR) were collected at baseline, 1-year and 2-years. Due to low prospective enrolment (n=25 switchers), prospective and retrospective data were pooled. 125 switchers (93 rFVIIIFc, 32 rFIXFc) and 33 non-switchers were included. The median age was 17 (rFVIIIFc) and 38 years (rFIXFc). Prior to switch, over 80% were on prophylaxis. There was a statistically significant reduction in the prescribed weekly prophylactic dose after the switch to rFVIIIFc/rFIXFc for all age groups, with a corresponding reduction (15-16%) in actual annualized FIX utilization in switchers (combined adults and children) to rFIXFc, and a smaller non-significant reduction in actual annualized FVIIII utilization (7%) in children who switched to rFVIIIFc. A significant reduction in the median ABR was only observed in children who switched to rFVIIIFc, but not in adults who switched to rFVIIIFc or rFIXFc. Switching from SHL to EHL products led to a small reduction in factor utilization, while preserving a low ABR in children and adults with haemophilia. Further patient-reported outcomes data will further elucidate the role of EHL in the haemophilia landscape.

Long-Term Durability, Safety and Efficacy of Fitusiran Prophylaxis in People with Hemophilia a or B, with or without Inhibitors - Results from the Phase II Study

Long-Term Durability, Safety and Efficacy of Fitusiran Prophylaxis in People with Hemophilia a or B, with or without Inhibitors - Results from the Phase II Study

Health-related quality of life and caregiver burden of emicizumab in children with haemophilia A and factor VIII inhibitors-Results from the HAVEN 2 study.

IntroductionPersons with haemophilia A (PwHA) with factor (F)VIII inhibitors, including children, have impaired health‐related quality of life (HRQoL). The HAVEN 2 study (NCT027955767) of paediatric PwHA with FVIII inhibitors demonstrated that subcutaneous emicizumab prophylaxis resulted in low annualizedbleed rates.AimWe assessed the impact of emicizumab prophylaxis on the HRQoL of children and their caregivers participating in HAVEN 2.MethodsChildren aged 8‐11 years self‐reported HRQoL using the Haemophilia‐Specific Quality of Life Assessment Instrument for Children and Adolescents Short Form (Haemo‐QoL SF II). Caregivers of children aged 0‐11 years completed the Adapted Inhibitor‐Specific Quality of Life Assessment with Aspects of Caregiver Burden. All scores were transformed to a 0‐100 scale, where lower scores reflect a better HRQoL. The number of missed days from school/day care and hospitalizations was also recorded.ResultsIn HAVEN 2 (n = 88), the median age was 6.5 years (range: 1‐15 years); 85 participants were aged < 12 years and included in this analysis, and 34 participants were aged 8‐11 years, thereby eligible to complete the Haemo‐QoL SF II questionnaire. The mean (standard deviation, n) baseline Haemo‐QoL SF II ‘Total’ score was 30.2 (14.9, 30), indicating moderate impairment; with emicizumab, mean score decreased by −9.62 (7.73, 17) points to 23.0 (13.93, 20) by Week 49. The most improved domains were ‘Sports & School’ and ‘Physical Health’. Caregivers reported similar improvements.ConclusionProphylactic emicizumab is accompanied by substantial and sustained improvements in HRQoL of paediatric PwHA with FVIII inhibitors and their caregivers.

BIVV001, a new class of factor VIII replacement for hemophilia A that is independent of von Willebrand factor in primates and mice

AbstractFactor VIII (FVIII) replacement products enable comprehensive care in hemophilia A. Treatment goals in severe hemophilia A are expanding beyond low annualized bleed rates to include long-term outcomes associated with high sustained FVIII levels. Endogenous von Willebrand factor (VWF) stabilizes and protects FVIII from degradation and clearance, but it also subjects FVIII to a half-life ceiling of ∼15 to 19 hours. Increasing recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) half-life further is ultimately dependent upon uncoupling rFVIII from endogenous VWF. We have developed a new class of FVIII replacement, rFVIIIFc-VWF-XTEN (BIVV001), that is physically decoupled from endogenous VWF and has enhanced pharmacokinetic properties compared with all previous FVIII products. BIVV001 was bioengineered as a unique fusion protein consisting of a VWF-DʹD3 domain fused to rFVIII via immunoglobulin-G1 Fc domains and 2 XTEN polypeptides (Amunix Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Mountain View, CA). Plasma FVIII half-life after BIVV001 administration in mice and monkeys was 25 to 31 hours and 33 to 34 hours, respectively, representing a three- to fourfold increase in FVIII half-life. Our results showed that multifaceted protein engineering, far beyond a few amino acid substitutions, could significantly improve rFVIII pharmacokinetic properties while maintaining hemostatic function. BIVV001 is the first rFVIII with the potential to significantly change the treatment paradigm for severe hemophilia A by providing optimal protection against all bleed types, with less frequent doses. The protein engineering methods described herein can also be applied to other complex proteins.

Extending recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein dosing interval to 14 or more days in patients with hemophilia B

BackgroundIn the phase 3 B‐LONG study (NCT01027364), prophylaxis with recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) every 7 to >14 days was associated with low annualized bleed rates (ABRs) in males aged ≥12 years with severe hemophilia B. The long‐term safety and efficacy of rFIXFc prophylaxis was confirmed in the B‐YOND study (NCT01425723), an extension of the B‐LONG clinical trial. ObjectiveThe aim of this post‐hoc analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of a ≥14‐day rFIXFc dosing interval in patients treated prophylactically during B‐LONG or B‐YOND. MethodsThe analysis included 22 patients aged ≥12 years who received prophylactic rFIXFc with a ≥14‐day dosing interval at any time during B‐LONG or B‐YOND up until the second interim analysis of B‐YOND (September 2015). ResultsThe median (interquartile range [IQR]) rFIXFc exposure on the ≥14‐day dosing interval was 3.4 (1.8‐4) years. Patients treated with a ≥14‐day dosing interval were well controlled with a median (IQR) overall ABR of 1.6 (0.6‐2.7) and a median (IQR) spontaneous ABR of 0.7 (0.3‐1.1) in 18 evaluable patients. A rFIXFc dosing interval of ≥14 days was well tolerated, with no new safety concerns identified. ConclusionMost patients on rFIXFc prophylaxis, with a dosing interval of ≥14 days, remained well controlled; ABRs were consistent with those reported in the overall study population. A ≥14‐day dosing interval can be utilized in some well controlled individuals and reduces the burden imposed by frequent prophylactic injections while maintaining adequate bleed suppression.

B-YOND Final Results Confirm Established Safety, Sustained Efficacy, and Extended Dosing Interval for Up to 4 Years of Treatment With rFIXFc in Previously Treated Subjects With Severe Hemophilia B

B-YOND Final Results Confirm Established Safety, Sustained Efficacy, and Extended Dosing Interval for Up to 4 Years of Treatment With rFIXFc in Previously Treated Subjects With Severe Hemophilia B

Efficacy of an Extended Half-Life GlycoPEGylated rFVIII (N8-GP): Pooled Analysis of ABR (Results from Two Clinical Trials)

IntroductionThe short half-life of standard factor VIII (FVIII) products means that frequent injections (3 to 4 times/week) are needed for effective prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A. N8-GP (turoctocog alfa pegol), an extended half-life glycoPEGylated recombinant FVIII developed for the prophylaxis and treatment of bleeds in patients with hemophilia A, allows for less frequent dosing. Bleed frequency is an important outcome measure in hemophilia, particularly when choosing a dosing regimen that best suits a broad range of patients.ObjectivesTo summarize annualized bleeding rate (ABR) data from 2 clinical trials of N8-GP in patients with severe hemophilia A.MethodsPatients with severe hemophilia A (FVIII <1%) were enrolled into the pathfinder comprehensive clinical trial program:•pathfinder 2 main phase•Adults/adolescents ≥12 years, N8-GP 50 IU/kg every 4 days (Q4D) or 20-75 IU/kg on demandpathfinder 2 extension phase•Adults/adolescents ≥12 years, randomized to receive N8-GP 50 IU/kg Q4D or 75 IU/kg once weekly (Q7D)•Patients with ≤2 bleeds in the last 6 months were eligible for randomizationpathfinder 5 main phase•Children <12 years, N8-GP 60 IU/kg (50-75 IU/kg) twice weekly.ABR was analyzed using a Poisson-regression model on the number of bleeds per patient, allowing for over-dispersion and using log-planned observation duration as an offset to allow for different treatment durations, with age cohort as a factor for pathfinder 5. Median and estimated Poisson mean ABR data from the 2 trials were summarized for overall, spontaneous, traumatic, joint, and muscle bleeds.ResultsFor adults/adolescents receiving N8-GP 50 IU/kg Q4D (pathfinder 2 main phase) and those randomized to receive 50 IU/kg Q4D or 75 IU/kg Q7D (pathfinder 2 extension), median overall ABRs were 1.18, 0.00, and 0.00, respectively (Table). Corresponding median ABRs were:•For spontaneous bleeds 0.00, 0.00, and 0.00•For traumatic bleeds 0.00, 0.00, and 0.00•For joint bleeds 0.85, 0.00, and 0.00•For muscle bleeds 0.00, 0.00, and 0.00.For children (aged 0-11 years) receiving 60 IU/kg twice weekly (pathfinder 5), median overall, spontaneous, traumatic, joint, and muscle ABRs were 1.95, 0.00, 0.00, 0.00, and 0.00, respectively. Poisson estimated mean ABR data for all bleed types are also shown in the Table.ConclusionN8-GP provides effective prophylactic protection in adult/adolescent and pediatric patients with severe hemophilia A, as demonstrated by low ABRs in phase 3 clinical trials. For patients of all ages, N8-GP enables simplicity in the choice of prophylaxis dose and dosing frequency with no need for pharmacokinetic-tailored dosing. [Display omitted] DisclosuresChowdary:Bayer, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and SOBI (publ): Research Funding; Baxalta (Shire), Baxter, Biogen Idec, CSL Behring, Freeline, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Shire, and SOBI: Consultancy. Hvitfeldt Poulsen:Lecturer on Nordic meeting on EHL FVIII (SOBI): Other: Lecturer ; Primary investigator and national coordinator on clinical trials from Bayer Health Care: Other: Primary Investigator and national coordinator; Nordic advisory boards (Bayer Health Care, Roche): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chaired an educational haemophilia symposium for nurses: Other: Chair. Escobar:Bayer, CSL Behring, Genentech, Hemabiologics, Kedrion, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer and Shire: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding. Kearney:Bayer, Bioverativ, Daiichi Sankyo, Grifols and Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Bayer, Bioverativ and Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chitlur:Novo Nordisk Inc: Consultancy; Baxter, Bayer, Biogen Idec, and Pfizer: Honoraria. Klamroth:Baxalta (Shire), Bayer, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer, Shire, and SOBI: Research Funding; Baxalta (Shire), Bayer, CSL Behring, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer, Shire, and SOBI: Consultancy. Negrier:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta/Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alnylam: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; LFB: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sobi/Bioverativ: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Clausen:Novo Nordisk: Employment. Driessler:Novo Nordisk: Employment. Landorph:Novo Nordisk: Employment. Santagostino:Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

ASPIRE Final Results Confirm Established Safety and Sustained Efficacy for Up to 4 Years of Treatment With rFVIIIFc in Previously Treated Subjects With Severe Hemophilia A

Introduction: Prophylactic replacement of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) is the standard of care in hemophilia A, given its natural mechanism of action, strict homeostatic regulation, and consistent safety profile. Recombinant FVIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) is an extended half-life therapy that demonstrated safety and efficacy in previously treated pediatric, adolescent, and adult subjects with severe hemophilia A in the Phase 3 A-LONG and Kids A-LONG trials (NCT01181128 and NCT01458106, respectively) (Young et al, J Thromb Haemostas, 2015; Mahlangu et al, Blood, 2014). Herein, the final results are reported from ASPIRE (NCT01454739), the long-term extension trial of those 2 studies.Methods: This was an open-label, multicenter, long-term trial of previously treated subjects of all ages with severe hemophilia A. Subjects received 1 of the 4 following regimens: individualized prophylaxis (IP; rFVIIIFc 25‒60 IU/kg every 3-5 days, or twice weekly), weekly prophylaxis (WP; rFVIIIFc 65 IU/kg every 7 days), modified prophylaxis (MP; personalized dosing), or episodic treatment (ET; on-demand dosing based on bleeding episodes). Subjects <12 years of age were eligible for only IP or MP. Investigators could switch a subject's treatment group at any time; therefore, each subject may appear in >1 treatment group. The primary endpoint was development of inhibitors. Secondary endpoints included annualized bleeding rates (ABRs), joint ABRs, spontaneous joint ABRs, exposure days (ED), and factor consumption. Descriptive statistics were used for analysis. Analyses were performed separately based on parent study.Results: A total of 211 subjects (150 were from A-LONG and 61 were from Kids A-LONG) enrolled in ASPIRE, and 186 subjects (132 from A-LONG and 54 from Kids A-LONG) completed the study. Subjects from Kids A-LONG had a median (range) age of 6.0 (2-12) years. Of the subjects from the A-LONG study enrolled to ASPIRE, the median (range) age was 31.0 (13-66) years. Most subjects received IP regardless of parent study (Kids A-LONG: IP [n=59], MP [n=3]; A-LONG: IP [n=110], WP [n=27], MP [n=21], ET [n=13]).No inhibitors were observed throughout the study, and the overall safety profile of rFVIIIFc was consistent with the parent studies and prior interim analyses. ABRs remained low throughout the entirety of ASPIRE in subjects prescribed IP (Table 1). For subjects from the Kids A-LONG study, the median (range) number of ED during ASPIRE was 332.0 (18.0-467.0) days. Total median (range) treatment duration was 166.6 (14.4-203.0) weeks. The median (range) number of ED for A-LONG subjects was 267.5 (8.0-660.0) days. Total median treatment duration was 201.4 (5.1-274.6) weeks. Overall, the median (range) duration of treatment with rFVIIIFc was 4.1 (0.4, 5.9) years.From the end of the parent study to the end of ASPIRE, the rFVIIIFc dosing interval increased for 6.6% and 21.1% of subjects from Kids A-LONG and A-LONG, respectively (Table 2). There was no change in median weekly factor consumption from the end of either parent study to the end of ASPIRE. For subjects from Kids A-LONG, the median (IQR) was 0.0 (0.0‒3.2), while the median (IQR) for those from A-LONG was 0.0 (0.0‒0.0).Conclusions: Throughout up to 4 years of treatment with rFVIIIFc in the ASPIRE extension study, no inhibitors were reported, and low ABRs and extended dosing intervals were sustained. These data are consistent with the well-characterized safety profile and durable efficacy of rFVIIIFc prophylaxis in previously treated subjects of all ages with hemophilia A. [Display omitted] DisclosuresNolan:Bayer: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Sobi: Research Funding. Mahlangu:Sanofi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Research Funding; Biogen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Chugai: Consultancy; Catalyst Biosciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Biomarin: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; LFB: Consultancy; Shire: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Spark: Consultancy, Research Funding. Young:Bayer: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kedrion: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Honoraria; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech/Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria. Konkle:Sangamo: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy; Spark: Consultancy, Research Funding; BioMarin: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding. Pasi:Shire: Speakers Bureau; Alnylam: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Honoraria; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; Biomarin: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sobi: Honoraria; Bioverativ: Honoraria, Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Speakers Bureau; Catalyst Bio: Honoraria; Apcintex: Honoraria. Oldenburg:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biotest: Honoraria, Research Funding; Biogen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria, Research Funding; Grifols: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Swedish Orphan Biovitrum: Honoraria, Research Funding. Nogami:Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties: Anti-FIXa/X bispecific antibodies , Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Tripkovic:Sobi: Employment. Rudin:Bioverativ: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Characteristics of Bleed-Free Patients on Every-5-Day Dosing in the Protect VIII (BAY 94-9027) Study

Background: BAY 94‐9027 is a B-domain-deleted recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) that is site-specifically PEGylated with a 60-kDa (2 x 30-kDa) polyethylene glycol (PEG) to extend its half-life. The efficacy and safety of BAY 94-9027 as prophylactic and on-demand therapy for patients with severe hemophilia A were demonstrated in the phase II/III PROTECT VIII trial, in which patients could receive prophylaxis every 7 days (E7D), every 5 days (E5D), or twice-weekly (2×W). Patients in the E5D arm had a low median annualized bleeding rate (ABR) of 1.9. This post hoc analysis was conducted to identify clinical predictors for ‘best responders’ (patients with ABR = 0) during E5D prophylaxis with BAY 94-9027 in PROTECT VIII.Methods: PROTECT VIII was a partially randomized, open-label trial of 134 males aged 12-65 years with severe hemophilia A (FVIII < 1%) and ≥ 150 FVIII exposure days. Prophylaxis patients received BAY 94-9027 25 IU/kg 2×W for a 10-week run-in period. Patients with ≤ 1 spontaneous joint or muscle bleed during this period were randomized to 45‒60 IU/kg E5D or 60 IU/kg E7D for the main 26-week study period; patients enrolling after the randomization arms were full, or with ≥ 2 bleeds in the run-in period, received 30-40 IU/kg 2×W. All patients randomized to the E5D arm (n = 43) remained on this dose-frequency throughout the main study. This post hoc analysis presents a description of baseline characteristics of best responders to E5D dosing, defined as patients with ABR = 0 during the main study period; the study was not powered to support a formal statistical comparison.Results: Of 43 patients randomized to E5D dosing, 24 (55.8%) had ABR ≥ 1 and 19 (44.2%) had ABR = 0, meeting the criterion for best responders. The median (95% CI) age was slightly higher for best responders, 38 years [30.0; 47.0] versus 31.5 [24.0; 41.0]), than patients with ABR ≥ 1. In the 12 months prior to the study, best responders had lower median (95% CI) bleeds (2.0 [0.0; 5.0] versus 10.0 [3.0; 21.0]) and joint bleeds (0.0 [0.0; 2.0] versus 8.0 [2.0; 12.0]) compared with patients with ABR ≥ 1. Most patients in both groups had previously received prophylaxis prior to study (84.2% and 70.8%, respectively). Fewer best responders had target joints (57.9%, versus 70.8% of patients with ABR ≥ 1); and those who did have target joints only 36.4% had ≥ 1 target joint, versus 47.1% of patients with ABR ≥ 1.Conclusions: Overall, the 43 patients receiving BAY 94-9027 E5D prophylaxis had a low median ABR of 1.9. The 19 of these patients who had an ABR of 0 (best responders) had numerically fewer bleeds in the 12 months prior to treatment initiation, particularly joint bleeds, and numerically fewer target joints, vs patients with ABR ≥ 1. Though requiring validation in a powered study, taken together, these results suggest the applicability of E5D BAY 94-9027 dosing across patient profiles, and that patients with a similar bleed and joint profile to those analyzed here may be able to achieve ABR of 0 with E5D BAY 94-9027. DisclosuresSantagostino:Bayer, Shire, CSL Behring, Pfizer, Novo Nordisk, Grifols, Kedrion, Sobi, Bioverativ, Octapharma, Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Negrier:Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sobi/Bioverativ: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Alnylam: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; LFB: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta/Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Tian:Bayer: Employment. Ducore:CSL Behring: Other: investigator; HemaBiologics: Consultancy, Other: investigator, travel support; OPKO: Other: investigator; Octapharma: Consultancy, Other: travel support, investigator , Research Funding; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Other: travel support, investigator; Shire: Consultancy, Other: travel support, investigator; Pfizer: Other: investigator; Biomarin: Other: investigator; Spark Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: investigator.

BAY 81-8973, a full-length recombinant factor VIII for the treatment of hemophilia A: product review

BAY 81-8973 (Kovaltry®) is an unmodified, full-length recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) approved for the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A. The amino acid sequence for BAY 81-8973 is identical to that of sucrose-formulated rFVIII (rFVIII-FS; Kogenate® FS/KOGENATE®, Bayer), but the two products differ in their manufacturing approaches. The manufacture of BAY 81-8973 includes several modifications and enhancements, such as the introduction of the gene for human heat shock protein 70, a molecular chaperone protein that facilitates folding of proteins; no addition of human- or animal-derived proteins in the cell culture, purification process, or final formulation; and use of a 20-nm filter to remove any potential aggregates and pathogens. BAY 81-8973 was extensively studied in the LEOPOLD clinical development program, which enrolled participants of all age groups (children, adolescents, and adults) with severe hemophilia A. The pharmacokinetic profile of BAY 81-8973 was shown to be noninferior to, and for some variables more favorable than, rFVIII-FS and another commercial full-length rFVIII product. BAY 81-8973 was shown to be efficacious when used for prophylaxis, on-demand treatment, and perioperative hemostasis. The efficacious prophylaxis dose of BAY 81-8973 was approximately 20-40 IU/kg given two or three times per week, which achieved low annualized bleeding rates. Either the one-stage or the chromogenic assay provides accurate measurements for postinfusion monitoring of BAY 81-8973 levels, with no product-specific calibration standard needed. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was ⩽7% across all LEOPOLD studies, and no previously treated patient developed anti-BAY 81-8973 inhibitors in the completed primary studies.

Pharmacokinetic-based prediction of real-life dosing of extended half-life clotting factor concentrates on hemophilia.

The improvement of clotting factor concentrates (CFCs) has undergone an impressive boost during the last six years. Since 2010, several new recombinant factor (rF)VIII/IX concentrates entered phase I/II/III clinical trials. The improvements are related to the culture of human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells, post-translational glycosylation, PEGylation, and co-expression of the fragment crystallizable (Fc) region of immunoglobulin (Ig)G1 or albumin genes in the manufacturing procedures. The extended half-life (EHL) CFCs allow an increase of the interval between bolus administrations during prophylaxis, a very important advantage for patients with difficulties in venous access. Although the inhibitor risk has not been fully established, phase III studies have provided standard prophylaxis protocols, which, compared with on-demand treatment, have achieved very low annualized bleeding rates (ABRs). The key pharmacokinetics (PK) parameter to tailor patient therapy is clearance, which is more reliable than the half-life of CFCs; the clearance considers the decay rate of the drug concentration-time profile, while the half-life considers only the half concentration of the drug at a given time. To tailor the prophylaxis of hemophilia patients in real-life, we propose two formulae (expressed in terms of the clearance, trough and dose interval between prophylaxis), respectively based on the one- and two-compartmental models (CMs), for the prediction of the optimal single dose of EHL CFCs. Once the data from the time decay of the CFCs are fitted by the one- or two-CMs after an individual PK analysis, such formulae provide to the treater the optimal trade-off among trough and time-intervals between boluses. In this way, a sufficiently long time-interval between bolus administration could be guaranteed for a wider class of patients, with a preassigned level of the trough. Finally, a PK approach using repeated dosing is discussed, and some examples with new EHL CFCs are shown.