Abstract Background Sigma metrics assess lab quality by incorporating precision, accuracy and total error allowed (TEa). Sigma metrics report quality on a 0-6 scale, with 6 representing World-Class quality. Due to logistical constraints, Sigma metrics are often calculated with limitations such as a small number of analyzers, single reagent lot or short duration. QuidelOrtho developed a novel approach using big data analytics for the objective, automated calculation of Sigma metrics across thousands of Vitros(R) analyzers running in real lab conditions. This approach was previously used to report the Sigma metric performance for 115 assays using data from 2022. Of particular interest is the consistency of quality levels for Vitros cardiac assays assessed in the study. Methods The methods follow the previous approach using the same Python algorithm to extract QC data from Jan. to Nov. 2023 (inclusive). A QC fluid lot from the study period was selected for each analyte to align with the fluid level reported in the 2022 study, which was based on medical relevance. Metrics were calculated for each set of QC data that originated from a single analyzer, reagent lot and calibration curve; the median Sigma metric is reported in the Results. Proficiency testing limits were utilized as TEa limits where available, with preference to CLIA 2024 limits. Results The following assays reported Sigma metrics as >6 using both 2022 and 2023 data: apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein B, CK-MB, dLDL, LDH, myoglobin, NT-proBNP, and triglycerides. Assays with higher metrics using 2023 data: CK (5.2 vs 5.5), dHDL (5.8 vs >6), hsTnI (4.1 vs 4.3), and NT-proBNP2 (4.2 vs >6). Assays with lower metrics using 2023 data: cholesterol (5.8 vs. 5.3) and homocysteine (>6 vs 5.9). CKMB2 (>6) is a newer assay that did not have metrics reported in 2022. Vitros cardiac assays report metrics within 0.5 Sigma of the 2022 metrics. An exception is NT-proBNP2, which changed from 4.2 to >6. However, the 2023 analysis has almost double the number of Vitros analyzers (51 vs 90), representing new use of NT-proBNP2. Conclusions Vitros cardiac assays report consistent metrics when using 2023 data compared to 2022. All Vitros cardiac assays assessed report Sigma metrics of 4 or greater, indicating they achieve results within the corresponding allowable error.
Read full abstract