Summary Lost circulation is one of the most challenging problems during drilling of oil and gas wells. This issue leads to significant loss of drilling fluid, increase of nonproductive time as well as dictating additional costs to drilling companies. Lost circulation may also lead to other consequences, including stuck pipe, poor hole cleaning, and well control issues. How to efficiently control lost circulation have been traditionally depending on the type of the used lost circulation material (LCM). Injection of commonly available materials (without any further process on their chemical properties) into the thief zone is a common method of lost circulation control. These nonmodified materials are named as conventional LCMs against the unconventional LCMs which are designed/produced just for fluid lost control. The objective of this paper is to comparatively investigate the performance of cane, oak shell, wheat, and mica as LCM of water-based drilling fluid exposed to fractured formations. These materials were chosen because of their low cost, easy access, and compatibility with the environment. The sealing efficiency of these materials was assessed at different particle-size distributions (PSDs) for proper treatment of loss circulation. To do so, an experimental setup containing a cell with adjustable fracture size was designed. Among the LCM formulations made of each of the materials, oak shell formulations are better than the others, followed by mica and cane blends, respectively. The results reveal that combining the materials together is a better treatment than the separate use of them. As it will be seen in detail later, high diversity in particle size (broad PSD) causes more efficient control of fluid loss. Also, to reduce the dependency of sealing ability of LCM formulation on fracture size, mixing of the materials with different particle sizes and shapes is recommended.
Read full abstract