Loss Of Mismatch Repair Protein Expression Research Articles

Frequent CTNNB1 or PIK3CA Mutations Occurred in Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma With High Levels of Microsatellite Instability and Loss of MSH2/MSH6 Expression.

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins form 2 heterodimers-MutSα formed by MSH2 and MSH6, and MutLα by MLH1 and PMS2. In endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas, cases with MMR protein defect also usually harbor other recurrent genetic mutations of the neoplasm. However, it remains unknown whether defects of the 2 functionally different heterodimers are linked to mutations in different genes. We aimed to study the MMR protein expression, microsatellite instability (MSI), and other common genetic mutations of endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma. We investigated the MSI status of 107 endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma patients. MMR protein expression, and mutation of KRAS, CTNNB1, and PIK3CA were also evaluated by immunohistochemistry and sequencing. An overall 34.6% (37/107) of endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas were MSI-H. All MSI-H tumors exhibited loss of MMR protein expression (loss of MLH1, PMS2, MSH6, and MSH2 was noted in 22, 25, 12, and 7 cases, respectively). CTNNB1, PIK3CA, and KRAS mutation were present in 9, 7, and 7 MSI-H tumors. Compared with patients with loss of PMS2 and/or MLH1 expression, patients with loss of MSH6 and/or MSH2 expression were associated with higher frequencies of CTNNB1 mutation (P=0.036) and PIK3CA mutation (P=0.025). In MSI-H endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinomas, different types of MMR protein deficiency indicate different molecular genetic alterations.

Prevalence of Mismatch Repair-Deficient Colorectal Adenoma/Polyp in Early-Onset, Advanced Cases: a Cross-Sectional Study Based on Iranian Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Registry.

Lynch syndrome (LS) increases the risk of many types of cancer, mainly colorectal cancer (CRC). The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in patients under the age of 50 with advanced adenomatous polyps, aiming at an early diagnosis of LS. This retrospective, cross-sectional study included eligible patients with advanced adenomas diagnosed ≤ 50years of age registered between April 2014 and February 2017 at three pathology centers in Mashhad. Pathological records were reviewed, and colon tissue specimens were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining to identify proteins which serve as markers for LS as they are related to loss of MMR gene (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) expression. Of 862 consecutive patients, a total of 50 adenomas (54% males, 46% females of mean age 41.24 ± 6.5) met the eligibility criteria. Of the adenomas examined, 20 (40%) had a tubulovillous component, 34 (68%) had high-grade dysplasia, and 30 (60%) had were larger than 10mm protrusions. None of the patients had loss of MMR protein expression. No individual with MMR genetic disorder was identified by IHC screening of early-onset advanced colorectal adenomas. This strategy is therefore not an effective strategy for detecting MMR mutation carriers.

Loss of Mismatch-repair Protein Expression and Microsatellite Instability in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma and Clinicopathologic Implications.

Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) may arise in the setting of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome [LS]) or sporadically. Variable frequencies of microsatellite instability (MSI) were found in UTUC. For advanced solid MSI tumors, targeted therapy with programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors is available. Therefore, we aimed to determine the prevalence of mismatch repair (MMR) protein loss and MSI in UTUC using a tissue microarray approach and further molecular and correlation analysis. We studied the immunohistochemical expression of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 on tissue microarrays containing formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples of 128 patients with UTUC. MSI analysis was performed in 79 cases with deficient MMR protein expression, and/or in patients aged 60 years and below, and/or other tumors possibly related to LS. Loss of MMR protein expression was seen in 24 (18.8%) of 128 cases. MSI analysis revealed MSI-high in 29, MSI-low in 7 cases. The Fisher exact test demonstrated significant differences between MSI and loss of MMR protein expression, clinically possible LS, tumor growth pattern, inverted growth pattern, and death (P< .001, P< .001, P=.002, P= .003, and P= .033, respectively). MSI does not appear to influence survival (overall and progression-free), but there was a significant shorter progression-free survival in MSI-high versus MSS patients who had received chemotherapy. The frequency of MSI in UTUC was 36 (28.1%) of 128 patients with a good accuracy of immunohistochemistry. In daily practice, MSI screening especially is recommended in patients with advanced UTUC and inverted papillary tumor growth pattern with the aim of screening patients for possible targeted therapy.

MMR Deficiency is Homogeneous in Pancreatic Carcinoma and Associated with High Density of Cd8-Positive Lymphocytes

BackgroundMicrosatellite instability (MSI) has emerged as a predictive biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Cancer heterogeneity represents a potential obstacle for the analysis of predicitive biomarkers. MSI has been reported in pancreatic cancer, but data on the possible extent of intratumoral heterogeneity are lacking.MethodsTo study MSI heterogeneity in pancreatic cancer, a tissue microarray (TMA) comprising 597 tumors was screened by immunohistochemistry with antibodies for the mismatch repair (MMR) proteins MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6.ResultsIn six suspicious cases, large section immunohistochemistry and microsatellite analysis (Bethesda panel) resulted in the identification of 4 (0.8%) validated MSI cases out of 480 interpretable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. MSI was absent in 55 adenocarcinomas of the ampulla of Vater and 7 acinar cell carcinomas. MMR deficiency always involved MSH6 loss, in three cases with additional loss of MSH2 expression. Three cancers were MSI-high and one case with isolated MSH6 loss was MSS in PCR analysis. The analysis of 44 cancer-containing tumor blocks revealed that the loss of MMR protein expression was always homogeneous in affected tumors. Automated digital image analysis of CD8 immunostaining demonstrated markedly higher CD8 + tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in tumors with (mean = 685, median = 626) than without (mean = 227; median = 124) MMR deficiency (p < 0.0001), suggesting a role of MSI for immune response.ConclusionsOur data suggest that MSI occurs early in a small subset of ductal adenocarcinomas of the pancreas and that immunohistochemical MMR analysis on limited biopsy or cytology material may be sufficient to estimate MMR status of the entire cancer mass.

Clinicopathological significance of deficient DNA mismatch repair and MLH1 promoter methylation in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

The pathogenesis of DNA mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient endometrial carcinoma (EC) is driven by inactivating methylation or less frequently mutation of an MMR gene (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, or MSH6). This study evaluated the prognostic and clinicopathologic differences between methylation-linked and nonmethylated MMR-deficient endometrioid ECs. We performed MMR immunohistochemistry and methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, and classified 682 unselected endometrioid ECs as MMR proficient (MMRp, n = 438) and MMR deficient (MMRd, n = 244), with the latter subcategorized as methylated (MMRd Met) and nonmethylated tumors. Loss of MMR protein expression was detected in 35.8% of the tumors as follows: MLH1 + PMS2 in 29.8%, PMS2 in 0.9%, MSH2 + MSH6 in 1.3%, MSH6 in 2.8%, and multiple abnormalities in 0.9%. Of the 244 MMRd cases, 76% were methylation-linked. MMR deficiency was associated with older age, high grade of differentiation (G3), advanced stage (II-IV), larger tumor size, abundant tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, PD-L1 positivity in immune cells and combined positive score, wild-type p53, negative L1CAM, ARID1A loss, and type of adjuvant therapy. MMRd-Met phenotype correlated with older age and larger tumor size, and predicted diminished disease-specific survival in the whole cohort. In the MMRd subgroup, univariate analysis demonstrated an association between disease-specific survival and disease stage II-IV, high grade (G3), deep myometrial invasion, lymphovascular invasion, ER negativity, and L1CAM positivity. In conclusion, MMR methylation profile correlates with clinicopathologic characteristics of endometrioid EC, and MMRd-Met phenotype predicts lower disease-specific survival. MMR deficiency, but not MLH1 methylation status, correlates with T-cell inflammation and PD-L1 expression.

Frequent loss of mutation-specific mismatch repair protein expression in nonneoplastic endometrium of Lynch syndrome patients.

Lynch syndrome is most often caused by a germline mutation in one of four DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, or MSH6) or EPCAM and is associated with a significantly increased risk of endometrial cancer in affected women. Although universal screening of endometrial cancer for Lynch syndrome is becoming increasingly common by various algorithms using MMR immunohistochemistry and/or microsatellite instability testing by PCR, establishing the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome can be still challenging. MMR-deficient nonneoplastic colonic crypts have been recently described in Lynch syndrome patients with colorectal carcinoma, and have been proposed to be a novel indicator of Lynch syndrome. Presence of MMR-deficient nonneoplastic endometrial glands have not yet been systematically evaluated in Lynch syndrome patients. We performed MMR protein immunohistochemistry in prophylactic hysterectomies and endometrial curettings/biopsies from 27 patients with known Lynch syndrome confirmed by germline mutation analysis. A total of 56 control benign endometrial tissues were also analyzed, and included benign endometrium adjacent to MMR-deficient sporadic (MLH1 promoter hypermethylated) endometrial carcinoma (n = 9), adjacent to MMR-intact sporadic endometrial carcinoma (n = 27), and normal endometrium from hysterectomies performed for benign disease (n = 20). MMR protein deficient nonneoplastic endometrial glands were identified in 70% (19 of 27) of Lynch syndrome patients. In all 19 cases the MMR protein loss was specific for the patients' known germline mutation. None of the control cases showed loss of MMR protein expression in nonneoplastic endometrium. Our findings suggest that MMR-deficient nonneoplastic endometrial glands may be a unique, specific marker of Lynch syndrome, and may provide an important insight into the pathogenesis of Lynch syndrome-associated endometrial cancer. Evaluation of MMR protein expression of benign background endometrium in endometrial cancer patients may be further explored as a possible useful addition to the Lynch syndrome screening algorithm.

Identification of novel Lynch syndrome mutations in Chinese patients with endometriod endometrial cancer.

Objective: Lynch syndrome (LS) predisposes patients to early onset endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). However, little is known about LS-related EEC in the Chinese population. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of LS and to identify the specific variants of LS in Chinese patients with EEC.Methods: We applied universal immunohistochemistry screening to detect the expression of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, which was followed by MLH1 methylation analysis to identify suspected LS cases, next-generation sequencing (NGS) to confirm LS, and microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis to verify LS.Results: We collected 211 samples with EEC. Twenty-seven (27/211, 12.8%) EEC cases had a loss of MMR protein expression. After MLH1 methylation analysis, 16 EEC cases were suggested to be associated with LS. Finally, through NGS and MSI analysis, we determined that 10 EEC (10/209, 4.78%) cases were associated with LS. Among those cases, 3 unreported mutations (1 frameshift and 2 nonsense) were identified. MSH6 c.597_597delC, found in 4 patients, is likely to be a founder mutation in China.Conclusions: We demonstrated the feasibility of a process for LS screening in Chinese patients with EEC, by using universal immunohistochemistry screening followed by MLH1 methylation analysis and confirmation through NGS and MSI analysis. The novel mutations identified in this study expand knowledge of LS.

Relationship between Microsatellite Instability, Immune Cells Infiltration, and Expression of Immune Checkpoint Molecules in Ovarian Carcinoma: Immunotherapeutic Strategies for the Future.

Ovarian cancer has the worst prognosis among gynecological cancers. Thus, new ovarian cancer treatment strategies are needed. Currently, immune checkpoint inhibitors such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody are attracting attention worldwide. The Food and Drug Administration approved the use of the PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab for solid cancers with microsatellite instability (MSI)-H or mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in 2017. However, few studies on ovarian carcinoma have evaluated the relationship among MSI status, lymphocyte infiltration into the tumor, and the expression of immune checkpoint molecules by histologic type. We evaluated the expression of MMR proteins, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD8+), and immune checkpoint molecules (PD-L1/PD-1) by immunohistochemistry in 136 ovarian cancer patients (76, 13, 23, and 24 cases were high-grade serous, mucinous, endometrioid, and clear cell carcinoma, respectively) to investigate the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Only six cases (4.4%) had loss of MMR protein expression. There was no significant relationship between MSI status and age (p = 0.496), FIGO stage (p = 0.357), initial treatment (primary debulking surgery [PDS] or neoadjuvant chemotherapy) (p = 0.419), residual tumor after PDS or interval debulking surgery (p = 0.202), and expression of CD8 (p = 0.126), PD-L1 (p = 0.432), and PD-1 (p = 0.653). These results suggest that only a small number of MSI cases in ovarian cancer can be effectively treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy. Therefore, to improve the prognosis of ovarian carcinoma, a combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and other anticancer drugs is necessary.

Identification of Germline Mismatch Repair Gene Mutations in Lung Cancer Patients With Paired Tumor-Normal Next Generation Sequencing: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Paired tumor-normal targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) is primarily used to identify actionable somatic mutations, but can also detect germline variants including pathogenic germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes that underlie Lynch syndrome. In the present study we examined paired NGS data from lung cancer patients to identify germline mutations in MMR genes. As lung cancer is not one of the recognized Lynch syndrome-associated neoplasms, we also investigated whether these lung cancer cases are due to Lynch syndrome or are instead sporadic cancers occurring in Lynch syndrome patients.Methods: A retrospective study of 1,179 lung cancer patients with available paired NGS data was performed to identify germline mutations in the MMR genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2, and evaluate tumor mutation burden (TMB). Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing was done on select cases with MMR gene mutations by either NGS or PCR/capillary electrophoresis approach. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MMR proteins was performed in select patients.Results: Pathogenic or likely-pathogenic germline mutations in PMS2, MSH2, or MSH6 were detected in 0.5% (6/1,179) of lung cancer patients; three of the patients had a family history of colon or gastric cancer. The median age at diagnosis of these cases was 68.5 years old. None of these six patients exhibited MSI or loss of MMR protein expression. Among them, no second hit somatic mutations in MMR genes (including single-nucleotide variants, small insertions or deletions and copy number alterations) were detected, and the median TMB was 4.5 muts/MB. Subsequent genetic testing of family members identified new Lynch syndrome cases in two first-degree relatives.Conclusion: These data imply that lung cancers in Lynch syndrome patients are unrelated to the underlying Lynch syndrome diagnosis and occur spontaneously. Nonetheless, paired tumor-normal NGS can identify germline mutations to help reveal Lynch syndrome in cancer patients. This has important implications for cancer screening and risk reduction in these patients and their families.

Alterations in β-catenin, microsatellite instability, and HNF-1β levels are independently associated with ovarian endometriosis–associated tumorigenesis

We focused on specific molecular events during the development of endometriosis-associated ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (OEmCa) and ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCCa). Alterations in β-catenin (encoded by CTNNB1) and microsatellite instability (MSI), as well as changes in the expression levels of HNF-1β and DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins were investigated in 50 OEmCas and 21 OCCCas with endometriotic lesions. Mutations of CTNNB1 were identified in 28 (56%) of the 50 OEmCa cases and 26 (41.9%) of the 62 coexisting endometriosis lesions. MSI-high (H) was observed in 7 (14.6%) of the 48 OEmCa and 14 (23.3%) of the 60 coexisting endometriosis, and was significantly associated with loss of MMR protein expression, but not CTNNB1 mutations. Nonidentical CTNNB1 status between 2 different epithelial lesions within endometriosis was observed in 8 of 10 informative endometriosis cases that had adjacent OEmCa. Similar findings for MSI features were also found in 2 of 3 informative cases, suggesting that endometriotic lesions may predominantly consist of polyclonal cells. In contrast, high HNF-1β expression was significantly associated with SLC3A1 expression, which plays a major role in HNF-1β-triggered induction of reactive oxygen species in OCCCas, independent of abnormalities in both β-catenin and MSI/MMR status. Finally, 4 inflammatory parameters associated with repeated hemorrhaging in endometriosis were significantly higher in endometriosis with MSI-high when compared with that with MSS, independent of both β-catenin and HNF-1β status. In conclusion, different molecular pathways including alterations in β-catenin, MSI, and HNF-1β levels may contribute to tumorigenesis in endometriosis-associated carcinoma.

PD-L1, RB1 and mismatch repair protein immunohistochemical expression in neuroendocrine carcinoma, small cell type, of the uterine cervix.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma, small cell type, of the uterine cervix (SmCC-Cx) is a rare human papilloma virus (HPV) related tumour with limited therapeutic options. Merkel cell carcinoma, another virus-associated neuroendocrine malignancy, has significant programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression rates. PD-L1 expression has been reported in other malignancies of the cervix. We aimed to determine the prevalence of PD-L1 in the context of mismatch repair protein (MMR) and RB1 expression status in SmCC-Cx. Ten cases of SmCC-Cx were tested by immunohistochemistry for expression of PD-L1, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, RB1, CD3, CD20 and for HPV by in-situ hybridisation (ISH). PD-L1 expression was scored quantitatively (H-score) in tumour cells and lymphocytes (tumoral/peritumoral). PD-L1 positivity was seen in seven cases, focal in most (H-score range 3-140). Three of nine cases showed MMR deficiency. PD-L1 expression levels correlated with MMR expression status: all three MLH1/PMS2-deficient cases had a ≥5% PD-L1 staining and an H-score ≥10 (P = 0.01). RB1 was lost in four of nine cases, all PD-L1 positive, but this correlation was not statistically significant. Seven of nine tumours were positive for HPV-ISH; two of these had MLH1/PMS2 loss. Of the two HPV-ISH negative tumours, one had MLS1/PMS2 loss. PD-L1 expression, predominantly focal, is seen in 70% of SmCC-Cx, while loss of MMR expression is seen in 33% of SmCC-Cx in our cohort. PD-L1 expression in more than 10% of tumour cells is seen in a subset of tumours in association with loss of MMR expression. These patients may be amenable to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy as a promising alternative for this aggressive disease.

Microsatellite Instability Occurs in a Subset of Follicular Thyroid Cancers.

Inactivation of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and the resulting microsatellite instability (MSI) are frequently observed in endometrial, stomach, and colorectal cancers, as well as more rarely in other solid tumor types. The prevalence of MSI in thyroid cancer has not been explored in depth, although recent studies utilizing data from large cancer sequencing efforts such as The Cancer Genome Atlas indicate that MSI is absent or at least very rare in the most common and most well studied histologic subtype, papillary thyroid carcinoma. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of MSI in thyroid cancer by using a large series comprising all major histological subtypes. A total of 485 thyroid cancer patients were screened for MSI/MMR deficiency, including all major histologic subtypes (195 papillary thyroid carcinoma, 156 follicular thyroid carcinoma [FTC], 50 anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, 65 medullary thyroid carcinoma, and 17 poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas) by using a combination of polymerase chain reaction-based detection, immunohistochemistry, and next-generation sequencing. A total of four tumors were MSI-high and had loss of MMR protein expression, all of which were from FTC patients. Whole-exome sequencing was performed on two MSI-high FTCs and revealed a hemizygous loss of function mutation in MSH2 in one tumor. Based on these data, it is estimated that the overall prevalence of MSI in FTC is 2.5%, and MSI is either entirely absent or rare in other histology subtypes of thyroid carcinoma. These findings highlight the importance of testing for MSI in FTC.

Gene-specific features (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2) of mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression and somatic mutations (muts), microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) in MSI-H and MMR-mutated tumor genomic profiles (TGPs).

505 Background: MSI is a tumor biomarker for immunotherapy efficacy that is closely associated w/deficient MMR, and is also variably associated w/somatic muts of the MMR genes, loss of MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and high TMB. Germ-line muts (Lynch syndrome/LS) in the 4 MMR genes are recognized to have distinct cancer spectrums/penetrance in LS, yet across all tumors, gene-specific variability in MMR IHC, MMR muts, and TMB is understudied. Methods: Results of TGPs performed by Caris Lifesciences (2015-17) were analyzed in colorectal (CRC), endometrial (EC) and all other cancers/tumors (OT) as: 1) all MSI-H tumors (n = 1057) and 2) all tumors w/ ≥1 mut in an MMR gene (n = 470). A subset of cases had IHC for MMR protein and PD-L1 expression. MSI and TMB were determined by NGS. Results: Characteristics of MSI-H tumors and tumors w/ ≥1 MMR mut are seen in the Table. A single MSH6 mut [F1088fs] in a coding microsatellite represented 31% of all MMR muts detected. F1088fs was found in 58% tumors w/MLH1/PMS2 loss (IHC) but only 25% w/MSH2/MSH6 loss (p &lt; 0.001), was more commonly seen in EC vs CRC/OT (p &lt; 0.001), and was negatively associated w/somatic POLE mut (p = 0.002). Distinct mut signatures in the MMR genes (e.g. GLUàSTOP) were seen in tumors w/POLE muts and DNA repair genes. Conclusions: MSI-H and MMR mutated tumors demonstrate marked gene-specific heterogeneity in IHC patterns, TMBs, and somatic muts that may be relevant to treatment selection, resistance, and response. [Table: see text]

Expression and clinical significance of MMR protein and MLH1 promoter methylation testing in endometrial cancer

Objective: To explore the expression and clinical significance of mismatch repair (MMR) protein and MLH1 promoter methylation testing in endometrial cancer (EC) . Methods: A total of 420 cases with EC diagnosed by the surgical pathology examination from the Department of Pathology of PLA General Hospital, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 protein in EC were detected by immunohistochemistry and methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MS-MLPA) testing. Results: (1) Of the 420 tumor cases, the total expression loss rate of MMR protein was 34.5% (145/420) , the expression loss rates of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 protein were respectively 17.1% (72/420) , 8.1% (34/420) , 7.4% (31/420) , 26.2% (110/420) and loss rates of MLH1 and PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6 were16.7% (70/420) , 6.2% (26/420). When there was a loss of MMR protein expression, any one or more protein expression deletions in MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6, it could be Lynch syndrome related endometrial carcinoma (LS-EC). The expression loss rate of MMR protein in the poorly differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma was higher than that in the well differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma (P<0.05). (2) The expression loss rate of MMR and PMS2 protein had statistically significant between the endometrioid adenocarcinoma and non-endometrioid adenocarcinoma (P<0.01). The expression loss rate of MSH2 protein had statistically significant in the stage Ⅲ (P<0.01). Moreover, there were also significant differences in depth of myometrial invasion and lymph node metastasis between the expression loss rate of MMR protein (P<0.05). (3) The expression loss rate of MLH1 protein was 72 cases and 57 cases had MLH1 promoter methylation testing (excluding those who were not qualified for DNA testing). The positive rate was 47.4% (27/57). Therefore, these patients were sporadic endometrial cancer, not non-LS-EC. Conclusions: MMR protein may be play an important role in the development of endometrial cancer and be indicated poor prognosis. Immunohistochemical staining and MLH1 promoter methylation detection may be play an important role in the screening of the LS-EC.

Discordant loss of mismatch repair proteins in advanced endometrial endometrioid carcinoma compared to paired primary uterine tumors

ObjectiveA subset of endometrial cancer is characterized by deficiencies in the mismatch repair (MMR) pathway. MMR testing is a well-established tool to screen for Lynch syndrome, but has also become a companion diagnostic test for immunotherapy. We compared the MMR status of primary and paired metastatic endometrial cancer to determine whether MMR deficiency can occur specifically in advanced endometrial cancer compared to primary tumor. MethodsMatched primary uterine and metastatic endometrioid adenocarcinoma from 2009 to 2018 at our institution were identified. PMS2 and MSH6 protein expression in metastatic and matched primary tumor was assessed using clinically validated immunohistochemistry methods for Lynch syndrome screening. MLH1 promoter hypermethylation and microsatellite instability (MSI) were performed in discordant cases. Results29 patients were identified with paired primary endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma and metastasis or recurrence after the original hysterectomy. Fourteen of 29 cases (48.2%, 14/29) were found to be MMR deficient at the metastatic or recurrent site. Two patients (6.9%, 2/29) showed discordant MMR status with PMS2 protein loss at the metastatic sites and intact expression in the primary uterine tumors. Both discordant cases exhibited abnormal subclonal loss at primary site and MLH1 promoter hypermethylation. High levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) was confirmed in one discordant metastatic site. ConclusionAdvanced endometrial cancer can rarely (~7%) show somatic loss of MMR protein expression in recurrent or metastatic sites compared to matched paired primary tumor. MMR testing of recurrent or metastasis should be considered for guiding immunotherapy if primary uterine tumor exhibits abnormal subclonal MMR loss.

Abstract 3081: Methylation changes and somatic mutations as early events in Lynch syndrome-associated colorectal cancer

Abstract Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome caused by germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes resulting in an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and other malignancies. Those germline defects with other genetic and epigenetic changes accelerate multistep tumorigenesis. However, early events leading to polyp formation and the timing and order of the molecular “hits” remain unknown. Studies on sporadic CRC have indicated that promoter hypermethylation leading to gene silencing can act as an alternative mechanism to mutations at early stages of tumorigenesis, but its importance in hereditary CRC is obscure. In this study we aimed to define 1) methylation changes that occur at different stages of LS-associated colorectal tumor progression, and 2) somatic mutations that occur in adenomas comparing the status of low- and high-grade dysplasia and MMR deficiency (MMR-D) and proficiency (MMR-P). Colorectal biopsies including normal mucosae, adenomas and carcinomas were prospectively collected from 104 LS patients during colonoscopy surveillance, supplemented with retrospective tumor specimens from 56 patients. Promoter methylation was analyzed using the methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification test (MS-MLPA) including selected tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) associated with early colon oncogenesis. Hypermethylation tendency was evaluated based on the frequency of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) according to the methylation status of eight established CIMP marker genes. LINE-1 methylation was studied as a surrogate marker for global hypomethylation. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect MMR protein expression in neoplastic lesions. As an ongoing study mutation status of adenomas are studied using the Ion AmpliSeqTM Colon and Lung Cancer Panel targeting mutational hot spots in 22 genes. Results indicate that the expression of the MMR protein corresponding to the gene mutated in the germline decreases along with dysplasia but occurs as a relatively late event in the tumor progression, suggesting the presence of other somatic events that drive neoplastic transformation. Taken together, methylation of TSGs and frequency of CIMP increased and LINE-1 methylation decreased in adenomas and carcinomas along with dysplasia. However, a significant increase of methylation in some genes was detected already in adenomas with low-grade dysplasia compared to normal mucosae. In addition, a proportion of low-grade adenomas could already be classified CIMP positive. When comparing MMR-P and MMR-D adenomas, LINE-1 methylation decreased along the loss of MMR protein expression, and interestingly, higher methylation of SFRP1 was observed in MMR-P adenomas compared to MMR-D cases and normal mucosae. These findings emphasize the importance and early appearance of epigenetic changes in LS-associated tumorigenesis. Citation Format: Satu Mäki-Nevala, Satu Valo, Ari Ristimäki, Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo, Anna Lepistö, Jukka-Pekka Mecklin, Päivi Peltomäki. Methylation changes and somatic mutations as early events in Lynch syndrome-associated colorectal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3081.

Prevalence and molecular characteristics of DNA mismatch repair protein-deficient sebaceous neoplasms and keratoacanthomas in a Japanese hospital-based population.

Muir-Torre syndrome (MTS) is currently considered as a clinical variant of Lynch syndrome (LS). The clinical significance of the screening of patients with MTS-associated cutaneous tumors for the identification of LS has not yet been established. In addition, the prevalence and molecular characteristics of mismatch repair (MMR) protein deficiency in such tumors has scarcely been investigated in the Japanese population. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MMR proteins (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2) was performed in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections prepared from 16 sebaceous neoplasms (SNs) resected from 13 patients and 32 keratoacanthomas (KAs) resected from 31 patients at our institution between January 2005 and March 2014. Tumors showing MMR protein loss were further subjected to genetic analysis for detecting the presence of germline and/or somatic alterations of the MMR genes to identify the precise molecular mechanisms underlying the protein loss. Among the 16 SNs resected from 13 patients, eight SNs resected from five patients (38.5%) showed loss of expression of MMR proteins (MLH1/PMS2 loss, one patient; MSH2/MSH6 loss, four patients). Genetic analyses showed a pathogenic germline MSH2 mutation in one patient, somatic hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter region in one patient, and somatic alterations of MSH2 without detectable germline mutations of MSH2 in three patients. None of the KAs examined in the study showed any loss of MMR protein expression. The efficacy of routine screening of cutaneous neoplasms known to be associated with MTS by IHC for MMR proteins to identify LS may be fairly limited. MMR protein loss as determined by IHC in SNs is not always diagnostic of LS, and appears, in most cases, to be a result of somatic inactivation of the MMR genes.

Microsatellite instability is a biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors in endometrial cancer.

In recent years, it has become evident that tumor cells have immune escape mechanisms, and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody) has shown benefit in various cancers. In endometrial tumors with microsatellite-instability (MSI), somatic mutations have the potential to encode ‘’non-self’’ immunogenic antigens, and lymphocytes have been shown to infiltrate the tumor. Therefore, immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy might be effective in endometrial cancers with MSI. Expression of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6), the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD8+), and PD-1/PD-L1 expression were assessed by immunohistochemistry in 149 patients with endometrial cancer. We examined whether tumors with MSI had an enhanced immune microenvironment and whether MSI could be a predictor of the therapeutic effect of PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in endometrial cancer. Loss of MMR protein expression was identified in 42 (28.2%) of 149 patients (MSI group) with endometrial cancer. There was no significant relationship between MSI status and age (p = 0.193), histological grade (p = 0.097), FIGO stage (p = 0.508), pelvic lymph node metastasis (p = 0.139), or depth of myometrial invasion (p = 0.494). However, the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (CD8+) and PD-L1/PD-1 expression were significantly higher in the MSI group compared to the microsatellite-stable group (p = 0.002, p = 0.001, and p = 0.008, respectively). These results suggest that immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody) could be effective in endometrial cancers with MSI. The presence of MSI may be a biomarker for good response to PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in endometrial cancer.

Abstract 4266: Double somatic mutations as a cause of tumor mismatch repair-deficiency in population-based colorectal and endometrial cancer with Lynch-like syndrome

Abstract Background: Tumour mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, determined by immunohistochemical (IHC) loss of MMR protein expression, is used diagnostically to identify individuals with Lynch syndrome. A high proportion of colorectal cancers (CRCs) and endometrial cancers (ECs) that demonstrate tumor MMR-deficiency are categorised as having “Lynch-like syndrome” due to the absence of tumor MLH1 methylation or germline MMR gene mutations after standard screening approaches. The aim of this study was to investigate somatic causes of tumor MMR-deficiency in patients with Lynch-like syndrome. Methods: Population-based participants with incident MMR-deficient colorectal (n=193; ACCFR and MCCS) or endometrial cancer (n=197; ANECS and MCCS) were categorised as either Lynch syndrome, MLH1 methylated or Lynch-like after screening for germline MMR gene mutations and for tumor MLH1 gene promoter hypermethylation. Lynch-like tumors were tested for somatic MMR gene mutations (point mutations and loss of heterozygosity) using AmpliSeq-Ion Proton custom capture sequencing and for MSH2 or MSH6 gene promoter methylation. Overall survival for molecularly defined subgroups of Lynch-like CRCs were compared to Lynch syndrome related CRCs using cox regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals adjusting for age at CRC diagnosis, sex, AJCC stage and grade. Results: Lynch-like tumors comprised 32% (63/193) and 23% (45/197) of the MMR-deficient CRCs and ECs, respectively compared with 27% and 15% for Lynch syndrome and 41% and 62% for MLH1 methylated CRCs and ECs, respectively. Two somatic mutations were identified in the MMR gene indicated by the pattern of MMR IHC loss of expression were identified in 36.7% (18/49) and 47.8% (11/23) of the Lynch-like CRCs and ECs tested. The proportion of tumors with double somatic alterations was highest for both CRC and EC tumors showing MSH2-deficiency (40% and 64.3%). The mean age at diagnosis for the Lynch-like CRCs with double somatic mutations was 49.7 ± 15.8years which was not significantly different from the Lynch syndrome CRCs (n=52; 45.4 ± 11.3years; p=0.2) but was significantly different compared with the MLH1 methylated CRCs (n=83; 70 ± 8.9years; p=0.0001). The adjusted HR for double somatic Lynch-like CRCs was 2.58 (95% CI, 0.77-8.67) compared with Lynch syndrome CRCs (p=0.1). No evidence of tumor MSH2 or MSH6 gene promoter methylation was identified in either MSH2-deficient or MSH6-deficient Lynch-like CRCs or ECs tested (n=34 and n=12, respectively). Conclusions: Double somatic mutations in the MMR genes represent a significant proportion of the unexplained Lynch-like MMR-deficient subtype for both population-based CRC and EC. Triaging strategies used to identify Lynch syndrome for both CRC and EC should include tumor testing for somatic mutations in the MMR genes. Note: This abstract was not presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Daniel D. Buchanan, Mark Clendenning, Harindra Jayasekara, Jihoon E. Joo, Ee M. Wong, Melissa C. Southey, Rhiannon J. Walters, Bernard J. Pope, Aung K. Win, John L. Hopper, Mark A. Jenkins, Roger L. Milne, Graham G. Giles, Dallas R. English, Finlay A. Macrae, Amanda B. Spurdle, Ingrid M. Winship, Christophe Rosty. Double somatic mutations as a cause of tumor mismatch repair-deficiency in population-based colorectal and endometrial cancer with Lynch-like syndrome [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4266. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4266

Utility of multi-gene panel testing with next generation sequencing in women with endometrial cancer.

5588 Background: Lynch syndrome (LS) accounts for 2-6% of all endometrial cancers (EC), and women with a germline mutation in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes ( MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) have an average lifetime risk of EC of 40%. As with breast and ovarian cancer syndromes, there are likely other genes implicated in the development of EC outside of the MMR genes. Multi-gene panel testing (MGPT) with next generation sequencing (NGS) allows for simultaneous analysis of numerous genes.We sought to evaluate the characteristics and incidence of gene mutations in women with newly diagnosed EC. Methods: We conducted a review of EC patients diagnosed from 6/2013 to 12/2016 who had MGPT at our institution. Demographics, family history, genetic testing results, and tumor characteristics were collected and analyzed using χ2 tests. Results: Of the 129 patients who had MGPT, 13 (10%) had a mutation and only 5 (38%) were in patients &lt; 50 years old. The median age of EC diagnosis is 55 (31-100) years and median BMI = 27.5 (21-59). Majority were stage 1, 76 (59%) and grade 1, 50 (39%). Patients with additional primary cancers, breast or colon were not more likely to have a mutation. However, patients with a family history of gynecologic cancer were more likely to have a mutation identified, 10 (77%) mutation vs no mutation 34 (29%), p = 0.003. Among all patients tested, 8 (6%) had a mutation in LS genes, and 6 (5%) had mutations in other genes ( BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, MUTYH, CHEK2); 1 (0.8%) had both MSH2 and CHEK2 mutation. Three patients had prior testing for breast cancer; 2 were found to have a BRCA1/ 2 mutation and the other was on Tamoxifen and BRCA negative. IHC was performed on 7 of 13 patients, and 5 (71%) had a loss of MMR protein expression. Variants of uncertain significance were noted in 35/129 (27%) of patients tested. Conclusions: Majority of EC patients with a mutation detected with NGS were &gt; age 50. We identified additional new mutations in non-LS genes including, CHEK2, RAD51C, and MUYTH with MGPT. These accounted for 29% of the mutations and would have not been not detected using classic LS gene testing. These genes are implicated in breast, ovary or colon cancer. MGPT testing is feasible and useful in identifying additional actionable gene mutations.