Lordosis Angle Research Articles

Is cervical sagittal alignment associated with pain and disability in myofascial pain syndrome?: A cross-sectional study

ObjectiveTo elucidate the role of cervical sagittal alignment in the pathophysiology of cervical myofascial pain syndrome(MFPS) and its impact on pain levels and disability status among patients. MethodsThis prospective cross-sectional study included participants aged 18–64 years experiencing neck pain for more than 3 months and diagnosed with MFPS. Cervical sagittal parameters (C0–2 cervical lordosis(CL) angle, C2–7 CL angle, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope, T1 slope minus CL mismatch(T1S-CL), and cervical tilt) were measured using Surgimap software by an expert physiatrist. Pain levels were assessed using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale(NRS), and neck disability was evaluated using the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire(NBQ). ResultsOut of 200 initially assessed participants with cervical MFPS, 133 were included after excluding ineligible individuals. The mean age of the participants was 35.3±8.2 years. Participants categorized by pain severity (moderate vs. severe) showed no significant differences in cervical range of motion, C0–2 angle, cSVA, T1 slope and T1S-CL. However, significant differences were observed in C2–7 angle (p=0.008), cervical tilt (p=0.006), and NBQ scores (p<0.001) between the two pain severity groups. Grouping based on T1S-CL compliance showed no significant differences in pain and disability effects. Correlation analysis revealed weak negative correlations between pain levels and C2–7 Cobb angle (p=0.009, r=0.226) as well as cervical tilt (p=0.005, r=0.243). No correlations were found between cervical sagittal parameters and NBQ scores. ConclusionsDecreased C2–7 CL angle and cervical tilt angle are associated with increased pain levels; however, cervical sagittal alignment was not found to be associated with disability.

Relationship of total sagittal spinal alignment index of thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis with physical function in community-dwelling older adults

ABSTRACT Background Overall spinal curvature is evaluated by calculating the difference between the angles of lumbar lordosis (LL) and thoracic kyphosis (TK) and is expressed as LL minus TK (LL-TK). It is unclear whether LL-TK is associated with physical function in community-dwelling older adults and whether it is more relevant than TK or LL alone. Objective This study aimed to identify whether LL-TK is associated with physical function in community-dwelling older adults, and whether it is strongly associated than TK or LL alone. Methods The participants comprised 1,674 community-dwelling older adults who underwent physical assessments (women, n = 1,099; mean age, 67.4 ± 5.3 years). As spinal alignment indices, TK and LL were measured using skin surface methods, and LL-TK was calculated as the difference between them. Decreased LL-TK indicated increased overall spinal curvature. Physical function was determined by measuring single-leg standing, five-times chair-stand, and usual gait speed. Stepwise multiple regression analyses were performed with each physical function as the dependent variable and spinal alignment indices as the independent variables, with adjustments. Results Multiple regression analyses showed that single-leg standing (β = 0.092, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.071 to 0.214, p < .001) and five-times chair-stand (β=-0.142, 95% CI = −0.037 to −0.019, p < .001) were significantly associated with LL-TK, but not LL. Both LL-TK (β = 0.121, 95% CI = 0.001 to 0.004, p < .001) and LL (β = 0.087, 95% CI = 0.001 to 0.003, p = .003) were significant determinants of usual gait speed. Conclusions This study showed that decreased LL-TK may be associated with poor physical function. This association may be stronger than that observed for TK or LL alone.

The Impact of L4-L5 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion on 2-Year Adjacent-level Parameters

ObjectiveThis study evaluates the impact of L4-5 minimally invasive surgery (MIS)-TLIF on adjacent-level parameters. MethodsThis is a retrospective study performed on consecutive patients between January 2015–December 2019. The index- and adjacent-level segmental lordosis (SL) and disc angle (DA) were measured. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected preoperatively and at 3–24 months postoperatively. Factors influencing changes in adjacent-level parameters and the occurrence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASDeg) were assessed. ResultsOne hundred and seventeen adult patients, averaging 65.5 years of age and slight preponderance of female (56.4%), were analyzed. L4-5 SL decreased at 2 years (p<0.05), but L4-5 DA significantly increased at all timepoints (p<0.05). While L3-4 SL and DA significantly decreased at all timepoints (p<0.05), L5-S1 SL decreased at 3 and 12 months (p<0.05) and L5-S1 DA only significantly decreased at 2 years (p<0.05). All PROs improved significantly (p<0.0001). The ASDeg rate was 19.7% at 2.2 years. Cephalad and caudal ASDeg rates were 12.0% and 10.3%, respectively. Eight patients (6.8%) required adjacent-level reoperations, mainly at L3-4 (6 cases). The use of expandable cage significantly reduced the odds of caudal ASDeg (OR 0.15, p=0.037), but had no significant effect on cephalad ASDeg.. ConclusionsL4-5 MIS-TLIF had a more consistent effect on L3-4 than L5-S1. Although adjacent-level SL and DA decreased over time, their association with ASDeg appears limited, suggesting a multifactorial etiology. L4-5 MIS-TLIF provides demonstrable clinical benefits with lasting PRO improvements and low adjacent-level reoperations.

MRI study on the influence of lumbosacral vertebral body and disc factors on lumbar lordosis in children.

To evaluate the influence of vertebral and disc wedging on the contribution of lumbar lordosis and the change of disc thickness before and after walking based on MRI. Cross-sectional study. A total of 96 normally developing children, aged 5.7 ± 3.0 years old, 55 boys and 41 girls. They were divided into 3 groups: Pre-walking group, Walking group, and Post-walking group. lumbar lordosis Angle (LLA), the sum of the lumbar disc wedge Angle (∑D), the sum of the lumbar vertebral body wedge Angle (∑B), disc height (DH). (1) LLA, ∑D, ∑B, and DHL1-S1 were 33.2 ± 8.7°, 14.1 ± 8.6°, 11.9 ± 8.6°, and 6.9 ± 1.2mm, 7.6 ± 1.4mm, 8.2 ± 1.6mm, 8.9 ± 1.7mm, 8.5 ± 1.8mm. (2) The difference in LLA values between the Pre-walking and the Post-walking group was statistically significant. DH were significantly different among the three groups. (3) In the Post-walking group, LLA value of girls was significantly higher than that of boys, and DHL3 - 4 and DHL4 - 5 values of girls were significantly lower than that of boys. (4) Age had a low positive correlation with LLA and ∑D and a moderate to strong positive correlation with DH; LLA showed a moderate positive correlation with ∑D, and a low positive correlation with ∑B and DH. Age and walking activity are the influencing factors of lumbar lordosis and disc thickening. Walking activity can significantly increase lumbar lordosis, and age is the main factor promoting lumbar disc thickening. DHL4-5 was the thickest lumbar intervertebral disc with the fastest intergroup thickening. Disc wedging contributes more to lumbar lordosis than vertebral wedging.

Interpretable Machine Learning Models Based on SHapley Additive exPlanations for Predicting the Risk of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage in Lumbar Fusion Surgery.

Retrospective study. The objective of this investigation was to formulate and internally verify a customized machine learning (ML) framework for forecasting cerebrospinal fluid leakage (CSFL) in lumbar fusion surgery. This was accomplished by integrating imaging parameters and employing the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) technique to elucidate the interpretability of the model. Given the increasing incidence and surgical volume of spinal degeneration worldwide, accurate predictions of postoperative complications are urgently needed. SHAP-based interpretable ML models have not been used for CSFL risk factor analysis in lumbar fusion surgery. Clinical and imaging data were retrospectively collected from 3505 patients who underwent lumbar fusion surgery. Six distinct machine learning models were formulated: extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), Gaussian naive Bayes (GaussianNB), and K-nearest neighbors (KNN) models. Evaluation of model performance on the test dataset was performed using performance metrics, and the analysis was executed through the SHAP framework. CSFL was detected in 95 out of 3505 patients (2.71%). Notably, the XGBoost model exhibited outstanding accuracy in forecasting CSFLs, with high precision (0.9815), recall (0.6667), accuracy (0.8182), F1 score (0.7347), and AUC (0.7343). Additionally, through SHAP analysis, significant predictors of CSFL were identified, including ligamentum flavum thickness, zygapophysial joint degeneration grade, central spinal stenosis grade, decompression segment count, decompression mode, intervertebral height difference, Cobb angle, intervertebral height index difference, operation mode, lumbar segment lordosis angle difference, Meyerding grade of lumbar spondylolisthesis, and revision surgery. The combination of the XGBoost model with the SHAP is an effective tool for predicting the risk of CSFL during lumbar fusion surgery. Its implementation could aid clinicians in making informed decisions, potentially enhancing patient outcomes and lowering healthcare expenses. This study advocates for the adoption of this approach in clinical settings to enhance the evaluation of CSFL risk among patients undergoing lumbar fusion.

Comparing OLIF Combined with Lateral Screw Fixation versus Minimally Invasive TLIF for Treating Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The present study aimed to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) combined with lateral screw fixation and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Mis-TLIF) for the treatment of single-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). Data regarding clinical and radiologic outcomes for single-level DLS treated using OLIF combined with lateral screw fixation or Mis-TLIF between November 2017 and June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Seventy-five patients with single-level DLS (≥2 years' follow-up) were included and divided into two groups according to the surgical method used: OLIF (n = 33) and Mis-TLIF (n = 42). Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay were significantly lower in the OLIF group than that in the Mis-TLIF group. There were no significant differences in preoperative low back pain (LBP), leg pain (LP), visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) between the two groups, although the OLIF group had significantly lower LBP VAS scores at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Additionally, the LP VAS score was significantly lower in the Mis-TLIF group than that in the OLIF group at 1 month postoperatively, and the ODI of the OLIF group at 3 months postoperatively was significantly lower than that of the Mis-TLIF group. There was no significant difference in the preoperative and postoperative lumbar lordosis angles between the two groups, whereas the postoperative surgical segmental lordosis angle and disk height (at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months) in the OLIF group were significantly higher than those in the Mis-TLIF group. Additionally, there was no significant difference in complication rates between the two groups (18.2% in the OLIF group vs. 11.9% in the Mis-TLIF group; p = 0.520). OLIF combined with lateral screw fixation yielded better clinical and radiologic outcomes than Mis-TLIF in patients with single-level DLS.

A New Index for Cervical Curvature Evaluation - Relative Cervical Curvature Area

ObjectiveTo put forward a new index of cervical curvature evaluation - relative cervical curvature area,and a new classification of cervical spine was proposed according to the relative cervical curvature area. MethodsA total of 167 subjects with cervical spondylosis were included in the study. Firstly, 119 subjects were selected to measure C2-C7 lordosis angle by Cobb angle method, Harrison posterior tangent method and Jackson physiological stress line method, and then their relative cervical curvature area, C1-C7 Cobb angle, C7 slope and T1 slope were measured.The correlation between relative cervical curvature area and three measurement methods and common sagittal parameters was analyzed.According to the angle classification method, we calculated the diagnostic boundary value of the relative cervical curvature area classification, and selected 48 subjects to evaluate its diagnostic efficacy.Finally, 119 subjects were re-evaluated according to the diagnostic threshold and the number of intersections to verify the feasibility of the new classification. ResultsThe results showed that the relative cervical curvature area index had good intra-observer and inter-observer repeatability. Relative cervical curvature area was correlated with Harrison posterior tangent method ( r = 0.930 ), Cobb angle method ( r = 0.886 ) and Jackson physiological stress line method ( r = 0.920 ), and correlated with C1-C7 Cobb angle, C7 slope and T1 slope.The relative cervical curvature area has a good diagnostic performance for distinguishing patients with lordosis, straightening and kyphosis.According to the new classification of cervical spine, 119 subjects were divided into 57 simple lordosis, 11 simple straightening, 4 simple kyphosis, 26 S-type and 21 RS-type. ConclusionThe relative cervical curvature area uses the area parameter instead of the original angle parameter and distance parameter to incorporate the change of segmental curvature, which makes up for the shortcomings of the Cobb angle method that only evaluates the curvature of two vertebrae, and better reflects the cervical curvature.Studies have shown that relative cervical curvature area has good repeatability and diagnostic value, and found that it has a good correlation with common cervical sagittal parameters.The new classification of cervical spine makes up for the disadvantage that the angle classification method cannot distinguish between S-type and RS-type, and initially proposes to use the number of intersections and the relative absolute value area to reflect the severity of S-type.

Effect of lumbosacral transitional vertebra on developmental alterations of the hip: a quantitative investigation of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex via whole-body computed tomography.

Lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) is a common spinal variant, with the reported prevalence varying from 8.1% to 36%. LSTV has been shown to alter the lumbo-pelvic parameters and reduce the benefits of total hip arthroplasty, but the specific effects of LSTV on hip development remain unclear. The aim of this study was thus to investigate the impact of LSTV on developmental alterations of the hip. A total of 310 individuals were categorized into three groups according to whole-body computed tomography (CT) imaging: a group with sacralization of 23 presacral vertebrae (PSV) (n=102), a group with lumbarization of 25 PSV (n=108), and a normal control group with 24 PSV (n=100). Quantitative parameters of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex (LPHC) including lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), axial and sagittal acetabular anteversion angle (AAA), center-edge (CE) angle, Sharp angle, and femoral neck-shaft angle (FNSA) were measured and analyzed. Statistical analyses were used to compare the differences of these quantitative parameters among the three groups and to assess the relationship between hip and lumbar-pelvic parameters. Significant differences between each pair of three groups and the LSTV subgroups were only found in the sagittal AAA (left side: P=0.008; right side: P<0.001), with no differences found for the other parameters. Compared to the normal group (24 PSV), both the 23 PSV and 25 PSV groups exhibited increased values in the sagittal AAA, especially in the right side of the 23 PSV group. Only the sagittal AAA showed low-to-moderate positive correlations with pelvic parameters of PI (r=0.195-0.429; P=0.001-0.08) and PT (r=0.239-0.605; P=0.001-0.03). Variations of LSTV are correlated with the hip anatomical development via LPHC transmission and may potentially reduce the sagittal acetabular coverage, particularly in the 23 PSV subtype on the right side.

The evolution of body posture in the sagittal plane in the sensitive growth period of children and adolescents undergoing individual scoliosis therapy: A pilot study

Introduction: The shape of the spine in the sagittal plane undergoes evolution, which occurs specifically in children and adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (IS). The aim of the study was to verify the variability of body features and indicators in relation to the features and parameters of body posture in children and adolescents with IS. Materials and Methods: 61 measurements of children and adolescents (three age groups) with IS were collected. Body height, body weight, waist circumference, hip circumference, scoliosis major curve angle, thoracic kyphosis angle, lumbar lordosis angle, spine length, and pelvic tilt were measured. BMI and WHtR were calculated. Results: The progression of characteristics and indices of body physique and changes in body proportions with age significantly affects the flattening of lumbar lordosis and pelvic tilt. At the same time, an inverse relationship between lumbar lordosis angle and scoliosis major curve in children and adolescents was found. There was a weak correlation of kyphosis with body characteristics and indices. Conclusions: Among children and adolescents with adolescent IS, the parameters of the pelvis and lumbar lordosis angle are independent of the thoracic kyphosis angle, and therefore, thoracic kyphosis can be described as a structural parameter, characteristic of scoliotic deformity.

Spinal Pathology and Muscle Morphologies with Chronic Low Back Pain and Lower Limb Amputation.

Low back pain (LBP) is highly prevalent after lower limb amputation (LLA) and contributes to substantial reductions in quality of life and function. Towards understanding pathophysiological mechanisms underlying LBP after LLA, this article compares lumbar spine pathologies and muscle morphologies between individuals with LBP, with and without LLA. We queried electronic medical records of Service members with and without LLA who sought care for LBP at military treatment facilities between January 2002 and May 2020. Two groups with cLBP, one with (n = 15) and one without unilateral transtibial LLA (n = 15), were identified and randomly chosen from a larger sample. Groups were matched by age, mass, and sex. Lumbar muscle morphology, Pfirrmann grades, Modic changes, facet arthrosis, Meyerding grades, and lordosis angle were determined from radiographs and magnetic resonance images available in the medical record. Independent t-tests compared variables between cohorts while multiple regression models determined if intramuscular fat influenced Pfirrmann grades. Chi-square determined differences in presence of spondylolysis and facet arthrosis. Lordosis angle was larger with LLA (P = 0.01). Spondylolysis was more prevalent with LLA (P = 0.008; 40%) whereas facet arthrosis was similar between cohorts (P = 0.3). Muscle area was not different between cohorts, yet intramuscular fat was greater with LLA (P ≤ 0.05). Intramuscular fat did not influence Pfirrmann grades (P > 0.15). Despite similar lumbar muscle size, those with unilateral LLA may be predisposed to progress to symptomatic spondylolisthesis and intramuscular fat. Surgical and/or rehabilitation interventions may mitigate long-term effects of diminished spinal health, decrease LBP-related disability, and improve function for individuals with LLA.

The Role of Pelvic Compensation in Sagittal Balance and Imbalance: The Impact of Pelvic Compensation on Spinal Alignment and Clinical Outcomes Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab system does not include a pelvic compensation (PC) subtype, potentially contributing to gaps in clinical characteristics and treatment strategy for deformity correction. It also remains uncertain as to whether PC has differing roles in sagittal balance (SB) or imbalance (SI) status. To compare radiological parameters and SRS-22r domains between patients with failed pelvic compensation (FPC) and successful pelvic compensation (SPC) based on preoperative SB and SI. A total of 145 adult spinal deformity patients who received deformity correction were analyzed. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were collected for statistical analysis. Patients were classified into 4 groups based on the median value of PT/PI ratio (PTr) and the cutoff value of SB. Patients with low PTr and high PTr were defined as FPC and SPC, respectively. Radiographic and clinical characteristics of different groups were compared. Patients with SPC exhibited significantly greater improvements in lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, PTr, and T1 pelvic angle as compared to patients with FPC, irrespective of SB or SI. No apparent differences in any of SRS-22r domains were observed at follow-up when comparing the SB-FPC and SB-SPC patients. However, patients with SI-SPC exhibited significantly better function, self-image, satisfaction, and subtotal domains at follow-up relative to those with SI-FPC. When SI-FPC and SI-SPC patients were subdivided further based on the degree of PI-LL by adjusting for age, the postoperative function and self-image domains were significantly better in the group with overcorrection of PI-LL than undercorrection of PI-LL in SI-FPC patients. However, no differences in these SRS-22r scores were observed when comparing the subgroups in SI-SPC patients. Flexible pelvic rotation is associated with benefits to the correction of sagittal parameters, irrespective of preoperative SB or SI status. However, PC is only significantly associated with clinical outcomes under SI. Patients with SI-FPC exhibit poorer postoperative clinical outcomes, which should be recommended to minimize PI-LL.

Pre-contoured patient-specific rods result in superior immediate sagittal plane alignment than surgeon contoured rods in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery typically involves posterior spinal fusion (PSF) using rods contoured by the surgeon, which may be time-consuming and may not reliably restore optimal sagittal alignment. However, pre-contoured patient-specific rods may more optimally restore sagittal spinal alignment. This study evaluates the radiographic outcomes of AIS patients who underwent PSF utilizing surgeon contoured vs. pre-contoured rods. This is a retrospective cohort study of AIS patients who underwent PSF with either surgeon contoured or pre-contoured rods. Demographics, Lenke classification, fused levels, osteotomies, estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical time were also obtained via chart review. Coronal curve magnitude, T5-T12 thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), PI-LL mismatch, and T1 pelvic angle (TPA) were obtained pre-operatively, postoperatively and at last follow up. Outcome measures included rate of achievement of postoperative radiographic alignment goals (TK between 20 and 40 degrees, PI-LL mismatch within 10 degrees, and TPA <14 degrees). Predicted post-operative sagittal alignment was also compared with observed measurements. Student's and paired t-tests were performed to determine significant mean differences for continuous variables, and chi-square for categorical variables. No differences were found in demographics, Lenke classification, preop radiographic measurements, fused levels, osteotomies, EBL, and surgical time in the surgeon contoured cohort (n=36; average follow up 11.3 months) and pre-contoured cohort (n=22; average follow up 9.7 months). At last follow up, 95.5% of patients with pre-contoured rods vs. 61.1% of patients with surgeon contoured rods (P=0.004) met TK goal. During assessment of first standing postoperative X-ray, 72.7% of patients with pre-contoured rods vs. 33.3% of patients with surgeon contoured rods met PI-LL mismatch goal (P=0.004). Other radiographic measurements were similar. Artificial intelligence (AI) predicted and observed differences for the pre-contoured group were 3.7 for TK (P=0.005), -7.6 for PI-LL mismatch (P=0.002), and -2.6 for TPA (P=0.11). AI and pre-contoured rods help achieve global sagittal balance with high accuracy and improved kyphosis restoration and PI-LL mismatch than surgeon contoured rods in AIS patients.

Effectiveness of Three-Dimensional Myofascial Release on Lumbar Lordosis in Individuals with Asymptomatic Hyperlordosis: A Placebo Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lumbar hyperlordosis is the most prevalent musculoskeletal postural deformity. Maintenance of normal limits of lumbar lordosis is necessary for obtaining an ideal posture. Literature suggests that poor posture results in fascial restriction in which the fascia reorganizes in response to tension. Gross myofascial release (MFR) combined with posterior pelvic tilting exercises proved to be beneficial in improving the lumbar range of motion. Three-dimensional (3D) MFR is a novel approach toward reducing fascial restrictions. However, the literature determining the effects of 3D MFR is still emerging. To determine the effect of 3D MFR on a lumbar lordosis angle and lumbar range of motion, in individuals with asymptomatic hyperlordosis. Participants (n = 30) with hyperlordosis were randomly assigned to either the experimental group receiving 3D MFR (n = 15) or the control group (n = 15) that received sham 3D MFR for six sessions (3 alternate days for 2 weeks). The outcomes were assessed at day 1 and day 6. Lumbar range of motion was assessed using modified-modified Schober's test and the lumbar lordosis angle was measured using x-ray and flexicurve. There was significant decrease (p = 0.0001) in the lumbar lordosis angle, increase in the lumbar flexion (p = 0.0001), and decrease in the extension (p = 0.0011) range of motion in the experimental group when compared to the control group. Lumbar lordosis decreased and the lumbar range of motion increased in the experimental group only with 3D MFR and not with sham 3D MFR. Hence, 3D MFR is an effective method in the correction of lumbar hyperlordosis and improving the lumbar range.Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI) trial number CTRI/2023/03/050340.

The Effect of Egoscue and American National Academy of Sports Medicine Exercises Along with Abdominal Drawing-in Maneuver on Pain and Lordosis Angle in Women with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The Effect of Egoscue and American National Academy of Sports Medicine Exercises Along with Abdominal Drawing-in Maneuver on Pain and Lordosis Angle in Women with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Evaluation of the Effect of Halo Gravity Traction on Lung Volume in Advanced and Severe Kyphoscoliosis Patients in Chest Radiography

Aim: To evaluate the effect of preoperative halo gravity traction on lung volume in patients with advanced and rigid kyphoscoliosis using planimetric measurements from chest radiography. Method: Ten patients with a mean age of 20.5±0.9 with a diagnosis of severe and severe kyphoscoliosis who underwent halo gravity traction between 2019 and 2021 were included in our study. Direct chest radiographs taken before and after traction were analyzed retrospectively. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of traction, planimetric evaluations were made on radiographs. Results: In the evaluation of radiological parameters, mean thoracic coronal cobb angle, lumbar cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis angle, lumbar lordosis angle, C1-S1 distance and lung volume before and after the procedure were 96.670°±8.4535°, 88,090°±4.5989°, 37.020°±11.5893°, 38.540°±11.1269°, 73.150°±7.0412°, 65.590°±7.3927°, 59.100°±9.5467°, 55.100°±9.0238°, It was 371.590mm± 64.2410mm, 408.330 mm±80.8229 mm and 967.730 mm3±318.404 mm3, 1155.180mm3±332.868 mm3. The decrease in thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, thoracic cobb and lumbar cobb angles and the increase in lung volume and distance between C1-S1 were statistically significant (p&amp;lt;0.05). Conclusion: Traction application is a safe method for deformities. It is effective in correcting sagittal and coronal curvatures. It is a method that is effective in pulmonary functions as well as increasing the lung volume radiologically.

Effects of abdominal hollowing and bracing on each intervertebral angle during quadruped upper and lower extremity lift: Three-dimensional motion analysis of the spine

To investigate the effects of intentionally minimizing spinal motion and abdominal muscle contractions on intervertebral angles during quadruped upper and lower extremity lift (QULEL). Fifteen healthy men performed the QULEL under four conditions: without any special instructions (basic), with the intention to minimize spinal motion (intentional), with abdominal bracing (bracing), and with abdominal hollowing (hollowing). Each intervertebral angle was calculated from the local coordinate system using the marker data obtained from a motion capture system. Shear moduli, as indicators of the activities of the right transversus abdominis (TrA), internal and external oblique, and rectus abdominis muscles, were assessed using shear wave elastography during QULEL. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance and multiple comparisons among conditions were used to compare each shear modulus of the abdominal muscle and the changes in thoracic kyphosis (Th1-12), lumbar lordosis (L1-5), and lumbar intervertebral angles from the quadruped position to QULEL. The significance level was set at P < 0.05. Changes in lumbar lordosis and L2/L3 and L3/L4 extension angles were significantly lower under hollowing than under other conditions (effect size ηG2: lumbar lordosis, 0.068; L2/L3, 0.072; L3/L4, 0.043). The change in the L1/L2 extension angle significantly decreased in bracing and hollowing compared with the basic (ηG2 = 0.070). Only the TrA shear modulus significantly increased in bracing and hollowing compared with the basic (ηG2 = 0.146). Abdominal hollowing during the QULEL increased TrA activity and suppressed lumbar extension, except at L4/L5, and may be more effective as a rehabilitation exercise for controlling spinal motion.

Efficacy of PE-PLIF with a novel ULBD approach for lumbar degeneration diseases: a large-channel endoscopic retrospective study

PurposeThis study aims to assess the effectiveness of Percutaneous Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE-PLIF) combined with a novel Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression (ULBD) approach using a large-channel endoscope in treating Lumbar Degenerative Diseases (LDD).MethodsThis retrospective analysis evaluates 41 LDD patients treated with PE-PLIF and ULBD from January 2021 to June 2023. A novel ULBD approach, called ‘Non-touch Over-Top’ technique, was utilized in this study. We compared preoperative and postoperative metrics such as demographic data, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, surgical details, and radiographic changes.ResultsThe average follow-up duration was 14.41 ± 2.86 months. Notable improvements were observed postoperatively in VAS scores for back and leg pain (from 5.56 ± 0.20 and 6.95 ± 0.24 to 0.20 ± 0.06 and 0.12 ± 0.05), ODI (from 58.68 ± 0.80% to 8.10 ± 0.49%), and JOA scores (from 9.37 ± 0.37 to 25.07 ± 0.38). Radiographic measurements showed significant improvements in lumbar and segmental lordosis angles, disc height, and spinal canal area. A high fusion rate (97.56% at 6 months, 100% at 12 months) and a low cage subsidence rate (2.44%) were noted.ConclusionsPE-PLIF combined with the novel ULBD technique via a large-channel endoscope offers significant short-term benefits for LDD management. The procedure effectively expands spinal canal volume, decompresses nerve structures, improves lumbar alignment, and stabilizes the spine. Notably, it improves patients' quality of life and minimizes complications, highlighting its potential as a promising LDD treatment option.

Efficacy analysis of OLIF combined with posterior percutaneous internal fixation in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with or without redundant nerve roots

To investigate the clinical efficacy of oblique lumbar interbody fusion(OLIF) combined with posterior percutaneous internal fixation in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with or without redundant nerve roots(RNRs). A retrospective analysis of 92 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated by oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion combined with posterior percutaneous internal fixation from June 2019 to June 2022 was performed. There were 32 males and 60 females, aged from 44 to 82 years old with an average of (63.67±9.93) years old. All patients were divided into RNRs positive group and RNRs negative group according to redundancy or not before operation. There were 38 patients in RNRs positive group, including 15 males and 23 females. The age ranged from 45 to 82 years old with an average of (65.45±10.37) years old. The disease duration was 24.00(12.00, 72.00) months. There were 54 patients in RNRs negative group, including 17 males and 37 females. The age ranged from 44 to 77 years old with an average of (62.42±9.51) years old. The disease duration was 13.50(9.00, 36.00) months. The general data of patients were recorded, including operation time, intraoperative blood loss and complications. The imaging parameters before and after operation were observed, including the number of stenosis segments, intervertebral space height, lumbar lordosis angle and dural sac area. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the back and lower extremity pain, and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) was used to evaluate the activities of daily living. All patients were followed up for 8 to 18 months with an average of (11.04±3.61) months, and no complications were found during the follow-up period.The number of stenosis segments in RNRs positive group (1.71±0.46) was more than that in RNRs negative group(1.17±0.38). In RNRs positive group, intervertebral space height, dural sac area, low back pain VAS, lower extremity pain VAS, ODI score were (1.11±0.19) cm, (0.46±0.17) cm2, (5.39±1.00) scores, (5.05±1.01) points, (55.74±4.05) points, respectively. RNRs negative groups respectively (0.97±0.23) cm, (0.69±0.26) cm2, (4.50±0.77) scores, (4.00±0.58) scores, (47.33±3.43) %. In RNRs positive group, intervertebral space height, dural sac area, low back pain VAS, leg pain VAS, ODI score were (1.60±0.19) cm, (0.74±0.36) cm2, (3.39±0.72) scores, (3.05±1.01) scores, (46.74±4.82) scores, respectively. RNRs negative groups respectively (1.48±0.25) cm, (1.12±0.35) cm2, (3.00±0.82) scores, (3.00±0.82) scores, (37.67±3.58) %. The postoperative intervertebral space height, dural sac area, low back pain VAS score, lower extremity pain VAS and ODI score of the patients in the RNRs positive group and the negative group were significantly improved compared with those before operation, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the number of stenosed segments, preoperative intervertebral space height, dural sac area, low back pain VAS, lower extremity pain VAS, and ODI between the two groups(P<0.05). There were significant differences in postoperative intervertebral space height and postoperative ODI between the two groups(P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in intervertebral space height before and after operation and ODI score before and after operation(P>0.05). There were significant differences in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative dural sac area, difference of dural sac area before and after operation, postoperative low back pain VAS, difference of low back pain VAS score before and after operation, difference of lower extremity pain VAS before and after operation between the two groups(P<0.05). OLIF combined with posterior percutaneous internal fixation has a good effect on patients with or without RNRs. Multi-segmental lumbar spinal stenosis and decreased dural sac area may lead to the occurrence of RNRs, and LSS patients with RNRs have more severe symptoms. LSS patients with RNRs have worse surgical outcomes than those without RNRs.

Comparative characteristics of cervical sagittal balance parameters and atlantoaxial instability criteria in normal and Down syndrome children

BACKGROUND: Sagittal balance of the spine has received considerable development in recent years. However, most studies focused on the assessment of vertebral–pelvic parameters. The cervical spine has long received insufficient attention from researchers, but this trend has been changing. The study of cervical sagittal balance in children with Down syndrome is beneficial in approaching the preconditions of atlantoaxial instability. AIM: To perform a comparative analysis of cervical sagittal balance parameters and atlantoaxial instability criteria in normal and Down syndrome children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiographs of the cervical spine in the neutral position in lateral projection and postural radiographs of 110 pediatric patients were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (normal), 60 children aged 4–17 years without spinal pathology, and group 2 (Down syndrome), 50 children aged 4–17 years with Down syndrome. The parameters of cervical sagittal balance (Oc-C2, Oc-C7, C1-C2, C2-C7, C2-C7H, C7S, Th1S, TIA, NT) and criteria for atlantoaxial instability (Nakamura angle, ADI, SAC-C1, SAC-C1/SAC-C4) were obtained, and data was statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Significant differences in the parameters C7S, Th1S, and TIA increased in children with Down syndrome. These parameters are involved in cervical lordosis; however, no significant differences in cervical lordosis angles were found. Furthermore, significant differences were noted in the criteria of atlantoaxial instability ADI, SAC-C1, and SAC-C1/SAC-C4 toward their decreasing in children with Down syndrome. CONCLUSION: In patients with Down syndrome, the indices of cervical lordosis are statistically greater than those in normal children. Moreover, the parameters of cervical lordosis in patients with Down syndrome do not differ from those in normal children. Therefore, during flexion, subcompensation of the cervical spine is observed in children with Down syndrome. Given the statistically smaller indicators ADI, SAC-C1, SAC-C1/SAC-C4, low neck muscle tone, and ligamentous hypermobility, these abnormalities can be considered as congenital predisposition factors for atlantoaxial instability in children with Down syndrome.

Short-term lumbar disc and lumbar stability changes of one-hole split endoscope technique treatment of spinal stenosis

ObjectiveInvestigating the early biomechanical effects of the one-hole split endoscope (OSE) technique on lumbar spine after decompression surgery.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 66 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) who underwent OSE technique surgery at the affiliated hospital of Binzhou Medical University from September 2021 to September 2022. The patients had complete postoperative follow-up records. The mean age was (51.73 ± 12.42) years, including 33 males and 33 females. The preoperative and postoperative imaging data were analyzed, including disc height (DH), foraminal height (FH), lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), changes in disc angle, anterior-posterior translation distance, and lumbar intervertebral disc Pfirrmann grading. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was applied to evaluate the severity of preoperative, postoperative day 1, postoperative 3 months, and final follow-up for back and leg pain. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was applied to assess the functionality at all the listed time points. The modified MacNab criteria were applied to evaluate the clinical efficacy at the final follow-up.ResultsIn 66 patients, there were statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in DH and FH at the affected segments compared to preoperative values, whereas no significant differences (p > 0.05) were found in DH and FH at the adjacent upper segments compared to preoperative values. There was no statistically significant difference in the LLA compared to preoperative values (p > 0.05). Both the affected segments and adjacent upper segments showed statistically significant differences in Pfirrmann grading compared to preoperative values (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the changes in disc angle or anterior-posterior translation distance in the affected or adjacent segments compared to preoperative values (p > 0.05). The VAS scores for back and leg pain, as well as the ODI, significantly improved at all postoperative time points compared to preoperative values. Among the comparisons at different time points, the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The clinical efficacy was evaluated at the final follow-up using the modified MacNab criteria, with 51 cases rated as excellent, 8 cases as good, and 7 cases as fair, resulting in an excellent-good rate of 89.39%.ConclusionsThe OSE technique, as a surgical option for decompression in the treatment of LSS, has no significant impact on lumbar spine stability in the early postoperative period. However, it does have some effects on the lumbar intervertebral discs, which may lead to a certain degree of degeneration.