We have made about 14,000 dentures of all types using a fluid resin and a hydrocolloid mold. Technicians' working time, and the over-all, elapsed processing time have been greatly reduced from that required by other methods. The working time per denture that has been saved amounts to 40 or 50 minutes. The finishing and remounting of dentures is simplified due to the clean and sharp separation of the cured dentures from the mold. The bases are more accurately adapted to the casts than were heat-cured resins. This was observed when test specimens of two A.D.A.-certified heat-curing resins were compared with the fluid resin specimens, both in a dry state and after six months in water (Fig. 11). The elimination of the gypsum investment and the use of the split flask seem to have reduced the amount of processing changes in the occlusion that had been consistently noted in our compression-molded dentures. Loss of vertical height of the occlusion of the dentures has been noted occasionally, but this has rarely exceeded 1 mm. when measured at the incisai pin of a Hanau articulator. About 10 per cent of the dentures have had voids as a result of incorrect sprue positioning or of pouring a too viscous resin. Most voids have been readily repaired with a small amount of resin and placed back into the processing unit with warm water for 5 minutes under 15 psi of air pressure. Repairs to the base are practically undetectable, even under magnification. This is probably due to the elimination of gypsum contamination and to the use of the original denture base material for repair. Pinpoint porosity will result if the processing unit loses air pressure, if inadequate air pressure is used initially, or if polymerization begins before the denture is put into the processing unit. All materials have handled well, even in room temperatures in excess of 90 °F., but polymerization is accelerated and the working time is shortened. Some partial dentures require rather complicated spruing procedures, but once the principles are learned, they presented no serious problem (Figs. 12 and 13). The movement of the distal extension metal framework due to packing pressures, such as is frequently observed when compression-molded techniques are used, appears to have been eliminated. Some tooth shifting has been noted where there has been extensive grinding on the teeth. With excessive grinding, the hydrocolloid does not adequately grip the tooth, and this permits tooth movement during pouring. Careful attention to detail must be followed, particularly during the wax-up. If a wax residue is left on the teeth prior to investing, a flash of resin over the tooth surface will invariably result. The average technician can be trained to perform the necessary processing procedures with a few days' observation and practical experience. The procedure lends itself well to small or large laboratory operations and is well suited for use in a dental office. The equipment required is minimal and requires a small amount of storage space. The over-all cleanliness of the laboratory area is greatly improved due to the elimination of the gypsum investing materials. Our results with other fluid-type resins have been generally satisfactory, but our best results have been obtained with the resin described. This is probably due to the incorporation of a greater amount of polymer ( 2 1 2 parts) in proportion to monomer (1 part) than the other resins usually contain (2 parts polymer to 1 part monomer). The glycerine or glycol type of hydrocolloid has given better results than those thinned with water. It seems to be tougher, cut cleaner, and have a longer working life. It does not have a tendency to dehydrate as readily, and has a slightly tacky surface which seems to maintain teeth in position better during the pouring and curing procedures.