Most eukaryotes have an evolutionary history of repeated polyploidization fol-lowed by fractionation (or diploidization; Makino and McLysaght, 2010; Jiao et al., 2011). The progression to the near dip-loid level is not random with regard to the classes of genes that are retained (Freeling et al., 2008; Freeling, 2009; Makino and McLysaght, 2010). Typically, the genes that are preferentially retained are involved with macromolecular machines or heavily con-nected in the interactome. This differential progression of genic retention is unlikely to be only due to changes in protein function of the different members of a duplicate pair in processes referred to as subfunctionali-zation (subdivision of function) and neo-functionalization (gain of a novel function; Freeling, 2009). There are two arguments why this should be the case. First, the same classes of genes that are preferentially retained following whole genome duplica-tion are preferentially underrepresented in segmental duplications (Freeling, et al., 2008; Makino and McLysaght, 2010). Both processes will produce duplicate genes that are available for divergence but the recipro-cal distribution suggests that other factors are operative. Secondly, the duplicates that are retained for longer periods of evolution-ary time very often eventually decay to the diploid state indicating that there has been no bona fide subdivision of function that would maintain both copies. It should be noted, however, that subdivision or gain of function has certainly been documented for duplicate genes in evolution and the reten-tion of regulatory genes for longer peri-ods of evolutionary time provides greater opportunity for these changes in function to accumulate.The types of genes that are preferen-tially retained following whole genome duplications and depleted in segmental copy number changes are quite similar to those shown to exhibit dosage effects in aneuploids (Birchler, 1979; Birchler and Newton, 1981; Guo and Birchler, 1994; Birchler et al., 2001). An analogy can be made to the generalized lack of effects on gene expression by whole genome changes but a regular and consistent set of modu-lations that occur in aneuploids (Birchler and Newton, 1981; Guo and Birchler, 1994; Guo et al., 1996). This set of observations led to the concept that the stoichiometry of members of regulatory macromolecular complexes involved in the control of tran-scription was important in affecting the expression of the target genes ( Birchler and Newton, 1981; Birchler et al., 2001 ). These types of dosage effects can often be reduced to the action of single genes ( Birchler et al., 2001) and indeed heterozygous mutations of transcription factors were recognized to produce human clinical conditions ( Veitia, 2002, 2003, 2004). The stoichiometry of members of macromolecular complexes was postulated to explain this (semi-) dominance (Veitia, 2002). An issue perti-nent to this discussion is the relationship of gene copy number to protein expression level. For instance, in a study in diploid yeast, knockouts of every gene were exam-ined for protein concentration (Springer et al., 2010). Only 5% showed no correla-tion and 80% of genes showed a strong correlation, i.e., 50% expression of normal. The connection between gene dosage and the phenotype can be traced back to clas-sical genetics in which it was known that changes in whole ploidy would produce some level of morphological change but alterations in the copy number of portions of the genome could be quite detrimental or indeed lethal ( Birchler and Veitia, 2007 ). Thus, the change in stoichiometry of dos-age balanced gene products would have negative fitness consequences manifested in the phenotype and be selected against (Papp et al., 2003; Birchler et al., 2005; Veitia et al., 2008).Biophysical evidence suggests that the more interaction partners a particular pro-tein has, the less likely it is to be involved with a duplication event, indicating further that macromolecular complexes require a balance of subunits to maintain good fitness (Liang et al., 2008 ). Examinations of protein databases also indicate that proteins with many interactions display lower expres-sional noise and are underrepresented in copy number variants (Schuster-Bockler et al., 2010). Thus, from the biochemical level to the phenotype, there is evidence for a balance of gene products involved in such complexes, which provides implications in biophysics, evolution, gene expression, and quantitative trait analysis. This synthesis is referred to as the Gene Balance Hypothesis (Birchler and Veitia, 2007, 2010). To reit-erate, the underlying theme of the above synthesis is that the amounts of different subunits and mode of assembly of multi-subunit complexes will affect the final yield and that this fact will impact the phenotype. One of the tenets of this concept is that dur -ing the assembly of multi-subunited com-plexes, a relative excess of one subunit might lead to the production of potentially inac-tive subcomplexes. Such a circumstance will produce a different quantity of the whole complex under consideration and affect the functional output.Schnable et al. (2011) highlight another aspect for the study of retained genes fol-lowing ancient tetraploidy. These authors