Longer Operative Time Research Articles

Feasibility of Office-Based Operative Hysteroscopy by a Tissue Removal System Without Anesthesia

To investigate the feasibility of operative hysteroscopy by a hysteroscopic tissue removal system (HTRS) without anesthesia in women with endometrial polyps (EP) or retained products of conception (RPOC). Prospective observational cohort study. University-affiliated Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Consenting women aged >18 years diagnosed with EP or RPOC from 9/2022 to 8/2023 confirmed by a prior office hysteroscopy. Office-based vaginoscopic operative hysteroscopy without anesthesia using the Mini-Elite Truclear HTRS. Oral misoprostol was prescribed for cervical ripening. The patients rated intraoperative and 5-minute postoperative pain levels on a visual analog scale, with mild pain defined as a score of 0 to 4, moderate as 5 to 7, and severe as 8 to 10. A successful procedure was defined as complete removal of the pathology. Fifty patients were included in this pilot study, and 47 (94.0%) procedures were completed successfully, including 21/24 (87.5%) cases of EP and all cases of RPOC (26/26, p = .06). No intra- or postoperative complications occurred. The intraoperative pain levels were rated as mild, moderate, and severe by 26 (52.0%), 16 (32.0%) and 8 (16.0%) patients, respectively. Severe intraoperative pain was more common in nulliparous women and those >10 years from their last vaginal delivery and was not associated with patient age, menopausal status, presence of abnormal uterine bleeding, or pathology size. Severe postoperative pain, reported by 5 (10.0%) patients, was significantly associated with removal of EP compared with RPOC, longer operative time, and nulliparity or >10 years from the last vaginal delivery. The procedure was considered acceptable by 46 (92.0%) patients, and 45 (90.0%) would recommend it to a friend/relative. Office-based operative hysteroscopy by the HTRS is successful and well tolerated by most women, especially for RPOC removal.

Safety of redo sleeve gastrectomy as a primary revisional procedure

BackgroundInsufficient weight loss after primary laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) occasionally requires revisional surgery. A few single-institution studies have examined the safety of redo LSG (RSG) and have shown mixed results. ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of RSG compared with LSG over a period of 30 days. SettingUniversity of Southern California, United States; Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database. MethodsThe 2020–2021 MBSAQIP registry was used to evaluate patients who underwent RSG. Thirty-day outcomes were evaluated using univariable analysis and multivariable logistic and linear regression. ResultsA total of 226,029 patients were reviewed, of whom 1454 (.7%) underwent RSG and 224,575 (99.3%) underwent initial LSG. Patients who underwent RSG were older (45 versus 42 yr), predominantly female (86.2% versus 81.3%), had a lower body mass index (40.0 versus 43.4), fewer co-morbidities, and greater rates of gastroesophageal reflux (38.7% versus 25.1%). They demonstrated increased overall complications (3.6% versus 2.1%, P < .001) and a longer operative time (81 versus 62 min, P < .001), but there was no difference in mortality. On multivariable analysis, patients who underwent RSG were independently associated with an increased risk of overall postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR]: 1.493, P = .018), organ space infection (OR: 6.231, P < .001), staple line leak (OR: 12.838, P < .001), pneumonia (OR: 3.85, P = .013), ventilator requirement over 48 hours (OR: 6.404, P = .035), sepsis (OR: 4.397, P = .010), septic shock (OR: 8.669, P < .001), reoperation (OR: 1.808, P = .013), readmission (OR: 2.104, P < .001), reintervention (OR: 4.435, P < .001), and longer operative times (β = 12.790, P < .001). ConclusionsIn this national database study, RSG was associated with increased rates of postoperative complications and a longer operative time. Although these results are concerning, further studies are required to examine long-term outcomes.

Comparison of total percutaneous in situ microneedle puncture and chimney technique for left subclavian artery fenestration in thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection.

To compare the outcomes of totally percutaneous in situ microneedle puncture for left subclavian artery (LSA) fenestration (ISMF) and chimney technique in type B aortic dissection (TBAD) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Data on patients who underwent either chimney-TEVAR (n = 89) or ISMF-TEVAR (n = 113) from October 2018 to April 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcomes were mortality and major complications at 30 days and during follow-up. The technical success rate was 84.3% in the chimney group and 93.8% in the ISMF group (p = 0.027). The incidence of immediate endoleakage was significantly higher in the chimney than ISMF group (15.7% vs 6.2%, respectively; p = 0.027). The 1- and 3-year survival rates in the chimney and ISMF groups were 98.9% ± 1.1% vs 98.1% ± 0.9% and 86.5% ± 6.3% vs 92.6% ± 4.1%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.715). The 3-year rate of cumulative freedom from branch occlusion in the chimney and ISMF group was 95.4% ± 2.3% vs 100%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.023). Both ISMF-TEVAR and chimney-TEVAR achieved satisfactory short- and mid-term outcomes for the preservation of the LSA in patients with TBAD. ISMF-TEVAR appears to offer better clinical outcomes with higher patency and lower reintervention rates. However, ISMF-TEVAR had longer operation times with higher procedure expenses. When LSA revascularization is required during TEVAR, in situ, fenestration, and chimney techniques are all safe and effective methods; in situ, fenestration-TEVAR appears to offer better clinical outcomes, but takes longer and is more complicated. LSA revascularization during TEVAR reduces post-operative complication rates. Both in situ ISMF-TEVAR and chimney-TEVAR are safe and effective techniques for the preservation of the LSA during TEVAR. The chimney technique is associated with a higher incidence of endoleakage and branch occlusion, but ISMF-TEVAR is a more complicated and expensive technique.

The Incidence of Winged Scapula after Thoracic Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths, and surgery is still the first treatment of choice in early and locally advanced cases. One of the iatrogenic complications is the serratus anterior palsy, which could lead to a winged scapula (WS). Unfortunately, the incidence of this deficit in thoracic surgery is unclear. Our primary aim was to determine the incidence of WS in lung cancer patients in a single-center experience. We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data with patients eligible for oncological thoracic surgery from March 2013 until January 2014. A physical evaluation of the WS was performed pre- and postoperatively, at the discharge and after 1 year of follow-up. A total of 485 patients were evaluated; 135 (27.8%) showed WS. Longer operative time (p < 0.0001), type of surgery (p < 0.0001), lymphadenectomy (p < 0.0001), and neoadjuvant treatment prior surgery (p = 0.0005) were significantly related to the WS injury. Multivariable analysis showed that type of surgery was significantly associated with WS (p < 0.0001). After 1 year, 41.6% still had WS. The incidence of WS was similar to the literature. As WS incidence is underdiagnosed, assessment and correct education about possible deficits or impairments should be improved. Moreover, when a minimally invasive approach is not planned, it is a good clinical practice to discuss surgical strategies with surgeons to reduce this deficit.

Sustainability of an enhanced recovery pathway after minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery

ObjectiveSame day discharge is safe after minimally invasive gynecology oncology surgery. Our quality improvement peri-operative program based on enhanced recovery after surgery principles led to an increase in same day...

Effect of neurosurgical residency programs on neurosurgical patient outcomes in a single health care system: a cohort study.

The evidence on the benefits and drawbacks of involving neurosurgical residents in the care of patients who undergo neurosurgical procedures is heterogeneous. We assessed the effect of neurosurgical residency programs on the outcomes of such patients in a large single-payer public health care system. Ten population-based cohorts of adult patients in Ontario who received neurosurgical care from 2013 to 2017 were identified on the basis of procedural codes, and the cohorts were followed in administrative health data sources. Patient outcomes by the status of the treating hospital (with or without a neurosurgical residency program) within each cohort were compared with models adjusted for a priori confounders and with adjusted multilevel models (MLMs) to also account for hospital-level factors. A total of 46 608 neurosurgical procedures were included. Operative time was 8%-30% longer in hospitals with neurosurgical residency programs in 9 out of 10 cohorts. Thirty-day mortality was lower in hospitals with neurosurgical residency programs for aneurysm repair (odds ratio [OR] 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.44), cerebrospinal fluid shunting (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34-0.79), intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.84), and posterior lumbar decompression (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.65) in adjusted models. The mortality rates remained significantly different only for aneurysm repair (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.69) and cerebrospinal shunting (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.85) in MLMs. Length of stay was mostly shorter in hospitals with neurosurgical residents, but this finding did not persist in MLMs. Thirty-day reoperation rates did not differ between hospital types in MLMs. For 30-day readmission rates, only extracerebral hematoma decompression was significant in MLMs (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.07-1.87). Hospitals with neurosurgical residents had longer operative times with similar to better outcomes. Most, but not all, of the differences between hospitals with and without residency programs were explained by hospital-level variables rather than direct effects of residents.

Comparative Study of Levels of Serum Bilirubin, Serum Transaminase, Serum Alkaline Phosphatase, and Prothrombin Time After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Open Cholecystectomy.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is universally accepted as the gold standard treatment for symptomatic gallstones. However, it has some drawbacks. Some of the major drawbacks of LC include increased bile duct injuries and longer operation time. Furthermore, it may cause changes in the body systems, such as alterations in acid-base, pulmonary status, cardiovascular system, and liver function. Thus far, no causes for these changes have been identified. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy on liver enzymes, prothrombin time (PT), and serum bilirubin. In the current study, we found significant increases in aspartate transferase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), and total bilirubin, on day 1 and day 3 after LC but no significant change in alkaline phosphatase (ALKP) and PT.It is important for surgeons to know about these transient changes in the immediate postoperative period to avoid misdiagnosis and adopt proper treatment and management.

Low-temperature photoluminescence measurement with a micromachined Joule-Thomson cooler

This study evaluates the effectiveness of micromachined Joule-Thomson (MJT) cooling for photoluminescence (PL) materials. Achieving low temperatures is crucial for enhancing PL performance in semiconductors. However, the commonly used liquid nitrogen (LN2) cryostats require frequent refills, hindering their long-term operation. The MJT cooler offers a potential solution by enabling integration with devices and longer operating time. To validate its effectiveness, this study conducted low-temperature PL measurements using a nitrogen MJT cooler. A MAPbI3 thin film was used as the characterization sample owing to its clear PL mechanism. The experiment successfully preserved its temperature-dependent PL property, with an observed orthorhombic phase-change phenomenon between 155-165 K. Furthermore, the system demonstrated short cool-down time (<1 h), minimal temperature impact from laser stimulus (<±0.1 K), sample storage stability, and low coolant consumption.

Initial Experiences of Laparoscopic Nephrectomy in a Tertiary Oncology Center: An Analysis of 142 Cases.

Kidney tumors have an important place among urological malignancies. The increased utilization of imaging methods has led to a rise in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) diagnoses, albeit with declining mortality rates, particularly in developed countries. Radical nephrectomy remains the gold standard treatment. The aim of this study was to share a tertiary oncology hospital's initial experiences with laparoscopic nephrectomy. This retrospective study analyzes data from patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy, focusing on demographic characteristics, tumor features, and operative outcomes. Information regarding age, gender, tumor size, operative details, and pathology results was collected and analyzed. One hundred forty-two patients were included in the study; 69 (48.60%) were female and 73 (51.40%) were male. The mean age of the patients was 57.11 ± 12.6 years, with tumors primarily located on the left kidney (52.80%). The mean tumor size was 53.01 ± 24.01 mm. Intraoperative complications included the need for conversion to open surgery in five cases and vascular, pneumothorax, or duodenal injuries in a subset of patients. However, postoperative complications, such as sepsis or mortality, were not observed. Despite an initial learning curve associated with longer operation times, laparoscopic techniques offer benefits, including reduced blood loss, faster recovery, and improved cosmetic outcomes. Histologically, clear cell RCC was the most common tumor type encountered. This study underscores the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, advocating for its widespread adoption while emphasizing the importance of surgeon experience and patient selection in optimizing outcomes.

Evaluation of the Clinical Advantages of Laparoscopic Transverse Abdominal Wall Suspension in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Objective: To evaluate the clinical advantages of laparoscopic transverse abdominal wall suspension in treating pelvic organ prolapse. Methods: Sixty patients diagnosed with moderate to severe pelvic organ prolapse and underwent surgical treatment in our hospital between January 2022 and December 2023 were selected. According to different surgical methods, they were divided into an observation group (given laparoscopic transverse abdominal wall suspension) and a control group (given transvaginal mesh implantation), with 30 subjects/group. The data on perioperative-related indicators, quality of life scores, postoperative recurrence, and complications of the two groups of patients were collected. Results: The postoperative hospitalization days and intraoperative bleeding volume of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group, but had longer operation time than that of the control group (P &lt; 0.05). The differences between the two groups were statistically significant 6 months after surgery, and the Pelvic Floor Disease Quality of Life Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) score of the observation group was significantly higher than the control group (P &lt; 0.05). Both groups of patients completed 12 months of follow-up without any postoperative recurrence. The number of complications in the observation group was slightly lower than that of the control group (P &gt; 0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic transverse abdominal wall suspension was more effective in treating pelvic organ prolapse and is an ideal surgical procedure.

Robotic Neck Dissection in Head and Neck Cancer via Modified BABA Technique.

Neck dissection forms an important component in the surgical management of head and neck cancers. By using the conventional techniques of neck dissection, a conspicuous scar is inevitable for the patients. The development of robotic assisted neck dissection provides for a scar-free neck along with good oncological and functional outcomes. A prospective observational study was conducted in our institute from 2020 March to 2022 March, where robotic-assisted neck dissections performed via the modified bilateral axillo-breast insufflation technique. Eighty-two patients underwent robotic neck dissections in our institute. Notably, 79 patients were treatment-naïve. The average docking time was 12 min and console time was 160 ± 15 min. The mean lymph node yield was 28.2. The average post-operative stay was 5.6 days. The average follow-up was noted to be 6.4 months. The mean cosmetic satisfaction score in our patients was 4.45. Only one patient presented with nodal recurrence, who was identified as a defaulter for adjuvant treatment. Robotic neck dissection gives similar functional and oncological outcomes as compared with conventional neck dissection. Patients had excellent cosmetic satisfaction following the procedure. The limitations of these techniques include high cost of procedure and longer operating time. This is a level IV evidence study. Although good oncological, functional, and cosmetic outcomes have been attained in robotic assisted neck dissection, further randomized controlled studies need to be conducted to justify the added costs, cosmetic advantage, and the time taken. IV Laryngoscope, 134:4045-4051, 2024.

Influence of additional prophylactic oral antibiotics during mechanical bowel preparation on surgical site infection in patients receiving colorectal surgery.

Prophylactic antibiotics (PAs) are standard for preventing surgical site infections (SSIs) post-colorectal surgery. This study aims to compare the effect of additional empiric oral antibiotics (OAs) alongside routine PAs to identify SSI risk factors. A retrospective observatory analysis was conducted from January 2019 to December 2022 at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. The cohort was divided into two groups: PA given 1h before surgery and discontinued within 24h, and OA administered empiric OAs during mechanical bowel preparation in addition to PA. From a total of 6736 patients, 3482 were in the PA group and 3254 in the OA group. SSI incidence showed no significant intergroup difference (p=0.374) even after propensity score matching (p=0.338). The multivariable analysis revealed male sex [odds ratio (OR): 2.153, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.626-2.852, and p=0.001], open surgery (OR: 3.335, 95% CI: 2.456-4.528, and p=0.001), dirty wound (OR: 2.171, 95% CI: 1.256-3.754, and p=0.006), and an operation time of more than 145min (OR: 2.110, 95% CI: 1.324-3.365, and p=0.002) as SSI risk factors. In rectal surgery subgroup, OA demonstrated a protective effect against SSI (OR: 0.613, 95% CI: 0.408-0.922, and p=0.019) and in laparoscopic approach (OR: 0.626, 95% CI: 0.412-0.952, and p=0.028). OA did not affect SSI incidence in colorectal surgeries. Male sex, open surgery, dirty wounds, and longer operation time were risk factors for SSI. However, for rectal and laparoscopic surgery, OA was a protective factor for SSI.

Peri-operative outcomes following radical prostatectomy in the setting of advanced prostate cancer.

To compare the peri-operative outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) for locally advanced, node-positive, and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), as determined through pathological staging, using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project. We identified RP procedures performed between 2019 and 2021. Patients were stratified by pathological staging to compare the effect of locally advanced disease (T3-4), node positivity (N+) and metastasis (M+) vs localised PCa (T1-2 N0 M0). Baseline demographics and 30-day outcomes, including operating time, length of hospital stay (LOS), 30-day mortality, readmissions, reoperations, major complications, minor complications and surgery-specific complications, were compared between groups. Pathological staging data were available for 9276 RPs. Baseline demographics were comparable. There was a slightly higher rate of minor complications in the locally advanced cohort, but no significant difference in major complications, 30-day mortality, readmissions, or rectal injuries. Node positivity was associated with longer operating time, LOS, and some slightly increased rates of 30-day complications. RP in patients with metastatic disease appeared to be similarly safe to RP in patients with M0 disease, although it was associated with a longer LOS and slightly increased rates of certain complications. For patients with pathologically determined locally advanced, node-positive, and metastatic PCa, RP appears to be safe, and is not associated with significantly higher rates of 30-day mortality or major complications compared to RP for localised PCa. This study adds to the growing body of literature investigating the role of RP for advanced PCa; further studies are needed to better characterise the risks and benefits of surgery in such patients.

Trends in the adoption of diverting loop ileostomy for acute complicated diverticulitis in the United States

BackgroundAcute complicated diverticulitis poses a substantial burden to individual patients and the health care system. A significant proportion of the cases necessitate emergency operations. The choice between Hartmann’s procedure and primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy remains controversial. MethodsUsing American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program patient user file data from 2012 to 2020, patients undergoing Hartmann’s procedure and primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy for nonelective sigmoidectomy for complicated diverticulitis were identified. Major adverse events, 30-day mortality, perioperative complications, operative duration, reoperation, and 30-day readmissions were assessed. ResultsOf 16,921 cases, 6.3% underwent primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy, showing a rising trend from 5.3% in 2012 to 8.4% in 2020. Primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy patients, compared to Hartmann’s procedure, had similar demographics and fewer severe comorbidities. Primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy exhibited lower rates of major adverse events (24.6% vs 29.3%, P = .001). After risk adjustment, primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy had similar risks of major adverse events and 30-day mortality compared to Hartmann’s procedure. While having lower odds of respiratory (adjusted odds ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.45–0.83) and infectious (adjusted odds ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.66–0.93) complications, primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy was associated with a 36-minute increment in operative duration and increased odds of 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.07–1.57) compared to Hartmann’s procedure. ConclusionPrimary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy displayed comparable odds of major adverse events compared to Hartmann’s procedure in acute complicated diverticulitis while mitigating infectious and respiratory complication risks. However, primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy was associated with longer operative times and greater odds of 30-day readmission. Evolving guidelines and increasing primary anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy use suggest a shift favoring primary anastomosis, especially in complicated diverticulitis. Future investigation of disparities in surgical approaches and patient outcomes is warranted to optimize acute diverticulitis care pathways.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Laparoscopic versus Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Colon Cancer: Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes-A Focus on Studies from 2020-2024.

Minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of colon cancer has significantly advanced over the years. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the operative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of colon cancer, focusing on operative time, hospital stay, conversion rates, anastomotic leak rates, and total number lymph node harvested. Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic search across four databases up to January 2024, registering our protocol with PROSPERO (CRD42024513326). We included studies comparing robotic and laparoscopic surgeries for colon cancer, assessing operative time, hospital length of stay, and other perioperative outcomes. Risk of bias was evaluated using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist. Statistical analysis utilized a mix of fixed and random-effects models based on heterogeneity. A total of 21 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 50,771 patients, with 21.75% undergoing robotic surgery and 78.25% laparoscopic surgery. Robotic surgery was associated with longer operative times (SMD = -1.27, p < 0.00001) but shorter hospital stays (MD = 0.42, p = 0.003) compared to laparoscopic surgery. Conversion rates were significantly higher in laparoscopic procedures (OR = 2.02, p < 0.00001). No significant differences were found in anastomotic leak rates. A higher number of lymph nodes was harvested by robotic approach (MD = -0.65, p = 0.04). Publication bias was addressed through funnel plot analysis and Egger's test, indicating the presence of asymmetry (p = 0.006). The choice of surgical method should be individualized, considering factors such as surgeon expertise, medical facilities, and patient-specific considerations. Future research should aim to elucidate long-term outcomes to further guide the clinical decision-making.

Investigating the predictive factors of thoracic aortic invasion and surgical outcomes in patients with primary lung cancer: A retrospective study.

This study aimed to investigate predictors of thoracic aortic invasion in lung cancer patients using preoperative clinical and imaging characteristics and elucidate surgical outcomes in cases of aortic invasion. Of the 4751 lung cancer patients who underwent surgery at our hospital, we included 126 (6.8%) who underwent left-sided surgery and in whom tumor appeared to be in contact with the thoracic aorta on preoperative imaging. The patients were divided into two groups: group A, 23 patients (18%) who underwent combined aortic resection (+); group B, 103 patients (82%) who did not undergo combined aortic resection (-). The percentage of aortic invasion for tumor diameter <3 cm, 3-4 cm, 4-5 cm, 5-7 cm, and >7 cm was 0%, 13%, 23%, 16%, and 35%, respectively. The percentages of aortic invasion were 27%, 16%, and 0% for tumor localization in the upper division, S6, and S10, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that aortic depression due to tumor or loss of fatty tissue between tumor and mediastinum in the chest CT significantly predicted aortic invasion (odds ratio = 23.83, 16.66). Group A demonstrated significantly more blood loss, longer operative time, prolonged hospital stay, and increased percentage of recurrent nerve palsy (13%) compared to group B. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for patients in group A were 53.4%, 24.3%, and 24.3%, respectively. If the chest CT of a patient demonstrates aortic depression due to tumor or loss of fatty tissue between tumor and mediastinum, aortic complications should be considered when planning surgery.

Isolated or Combined Ascending Aortic Replacement through a Partial Sternotomy: Early and Midterm Outcomes

Abstract Background We aimed to investigate the in-hospital and midterm outcomes of patients undergoing ascending aortic replacement (AAR) through a partial or a full sternotomy approach through a propensity matching analysis. Methods We retrospectively included all patients (n = 167) who underwent elective AAR in our institution between 2013 and 2020. The study population was divided into two groups according to the surgical access (40 patient in the partial sternotomy or “PS” group and 127 in the full sternotomy or “FS” group). Due to the significant differences between the groups, a propensity matching of 1:3 was applied. In-hospital complications, survival, and reoperation at follow-up were investigated. Results The PS group showed higher cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times than the FS group (94.2 vs. 83 minutes and 164.2 vs. 126.8 minutes, respectively). Moreover, the postoperative ventilation time was significantly higher in the PS group, but it did not affect the length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). The incidences of bleeding, stroke, and mortality were comparable between the two groups (11 vs. 3%, 3 vs. 6%, and 5 vs. 3%, respectively). After a median follow-up of 2 ± 1.98 years, the Kaplan–Meier analysis showed no significant differences between the two groups (log-rank, p = 0.17) in terms of survival. Conclusion The surgical ascending aorta replacement through a partial sternotomy is associated with longer operative times, but this does not affect the early as well as the long-term follow-up.

Outcome of Locked Reamed Intramedullary Nail v/s K-NAIL Plus Augmented Plating in Aseptic Distal Femur Non-Union

Background: Aseptic nonunion of the distal femur presents a significant challenge in orthopedic surgery, affecting patient outcomes and healthcare systems. Traditional treatments include locked reamed intramedullary nailing (LRIN) and K-nail with augmented plating, with varied reported efficacies. Objective: The study aimed to compare the outcomes of LRIN versus K-nail plus augmented plating in the treatment of aseptic nonunion of the distal femur, focusing on union rates, operative time, complications, and functional recovery. Methods: In this prospective comparative study, 50 patients with aseptic nonunion of the distal femur were randomly assigned to undergo either LRIN (Group A) or K-nail plus augmented plating (Group B). The primary outcome measures included the modified Radiographic Union Score for Tibial fractures (mRUST) and rates of implant failure and infection. Secondary outcomes considered operative time and intraoperative blood loss. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25, with a p-value of less than 0.05 deemed significant. Results: Group A exhibited higher mRUST scores at 12 weeks (4.84 vs. 4.16, p=0.010), 24 weeks (6.40 vs. 5.48, p&lt;0.001), and 36 weeks (8.12 vs. 7.00, p&lt;0.001). Nonunion rates at 36 weeks were lower in Group A (12% vs. 36%, p=0.047), with no significant differences in infection rates. Operative time was significantly longer for Group A (159.40±5.82 minutes) compared to Group B (123.96±6.20 minutes, p&lt;0.001), but there was no significant difference in blood loss between the groups. Conclusion: LRIN outperformed K-nail plus augmented plating in promoting bone union in aseptic nonunion of the distal femur, with a lower nonunion rate and higher mRUST scores, despite a longer operative time.

A meta-analysis between robotic hepatectomy and conventional open hepatectomy.

Current meta-analysis was performed to compare robotic hepatectomy (RH) with conventional open hepatectomy (OH) in terms of peri-operative and postoperative outcomes. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were all searched up for comparative studies between RH and OH. RevMan5.3 software and Stata 13.0 software were used for statistical analysis. Nineteen studies with 1747 patients who received RH and 23,633 patients who received OH were included. Pooled results indicated that patients who received RH were generally younger than those received OH (P < 0.00001). Moreover, RH was associated with longer operative time (P = 0.0002), less intraoperative hemorrhage (P < 0.0001), lower incidence of intraoperative transfusion (P = 0.003), lower incidence of postoperative any morbidity (P < 0.00001), postoperative major morbidity (P = 0.0001), mortalities with 90days after surgery (P < 0.0001), and shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.00001). Comparable total hospital costs were acquired between RH and OH groups (P = 0.46). However, even at the premise of comparable R0 rate (P = 0.86), RH was associated with smaller resected tumor size (P < 0.00001). Major hepatectomy (P = 0.02) and right posterior hepatectomy (P = 0.0003) were less frequently performed in RH group. Finally, we concluded that RH was superior to OH in terms of peri-operative and postoperative outcomes. RH could lead to less intraoperative hemorrhage, less postoperative complications and an enhanced postoperative recovery. However, major hepatectomy and right posterior hepatectomy were still less frequently performed via robotic approach. Future more powerful well-designed studies are required for further exploration.

Clinical efficacy and complications of blocking screw in the treatment of lower limb long bone fracture: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Blocking screw technique has been widely applied in the treatment of long shaft fractures. However, the evidence with regard to whether intramedullary nail combined with blocking screw technique has better clinical efficacy over other is not clear. The aim of the study was to explore the clinical efficacy and complications of intramedullary nail combined with blocking screw technique in the treatment of femoral or tibial shaft fractures. The PuMed, Embase, OVID, Cochrane library, Web of Science, Wanfang, CNKI and Weipu data were searched for studies of intramedullary nail combined with blocking screw in treatment of femoral or tibial shaft fracture published up to Aug 31 2023. Methodological quality of the trials was assessed, relevant data were extracted, and RevMan 5.3 and Stata 15.0 software were used to perform the meta-analysis of parameters related to the consequences. Twenty articles were included, including 1267 patients. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with the non-blocking screw group, the blocking screw group had longer operation time (WMD = 13.24; 95% CI = 5.68-20.79, P = .0006) and more intraoperative fluoroscopy times (WMD = 57.62; 95% CI = 25.82-89.42, P = .0002). However, the postoperative therapeutic response rate was higher (OR = 5.60; 95% CI = 2.10-14.93, P = .0006), postoperative ankle joint function was better (OR = 3.48; 95% CI = 1.20-10.13, P = .02), and fracture healing rate was higher (OR = 3.56; 95% CI = 1.43-8.89, P = .006), fracture healing time was shorter (WMD = -3.59; 95% CI = -4.96 to -2.22, P < .00001), intraoperative blood loss was less (WMD = -54.80; 95% CI = -88.77 to -20.83, P = .002), hospitalization time was shorter (WMD = -1.66; 95% CI = -2.08 to -1.24, P < .00001), and complications were less (OR = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.16-0.89, P = .01). There was no statistical significance in the range of motion of knee joint between the 2 groups (WMD = 10.04; 95% CI = -1.51 to 21.59, P = .09). Current evidence shows that intramedullary nail combined with blocking screw technique in the treatment of lower limb long bone fracture has the advantages of good clinical efficacy, high fracture healing rate, short fracture healing time, good joint function, less complications and so on, which is worthy of clinical recommendation.