Long-term Outcome Of Kidney Transplantation Research Articles

Impact of One-Year Serum Creatinine on Long-term Renal Graft Survival in a Living-Related Renal Transplant Program.

This study was carried out to determine the impact of one-year posttransplant serum creatinine (SCr) levels on the long-term outcomes of living-related donor kidney transplants. A retrospective cohort study included 773 adult living-related renal transplant recipients from 2010 to 2012, with a minimum follow-up period of five years. Demographics and posttransplantation follow-up data including immunosuppression regimens, rejection episodes, and survival rates were evaluated. Patients were divided into four cohorts (G1, G2, G3, and G4 based on SCr at the end of the 1st year: G1, SCr <88.4 μ mol/L; G2, 88.5≤ SCr ≤ 132.6 μmol/L; G3, 132.7≤ SCr ≤176.8 mol/L; and G4, SCr ≥176.9 μ mol/L). Comparisons between the groups used the Chi-square test for qualitative parameters and analysis of variance for continuous variables. Five-year graft survival for G1 was 98% as compared to 76% in G4 (P <0.001). Recipients of G4 encountered more acute rejection episodes in 21% of the cases as compared to 7.3% in G1 (P = 0.001). Donors were older in G4 (42.07 ± 10.4 years) as compared to G1 (30.1 ± 8.5 years) (P = 0.001). A third of the donors in G1 were HLA identical as compared to 7% in G4. Prediction of long-term graft survival is possible by the SCr level at one year post transplant. This can be of great importance, especially to identify those patients who require close monitoring in follow-up. Donor age, HLA, and acute rejection impact SCr at one year and hence graft outcome.

Practical Considerations for APOL1 Genotyping in the Living Kidney Donor Evaluation.

Association between the apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1) and nephropathy has altered the epidemiology of chronic kidney disease. In addition, donor APOL1 genotypes play important roles in the time to allograft failure in kidneys transplanted from deceased donors and the safety of living kidney donation. This article reviews genetic testing for inherited kidney disease in living kidney donors to improve donor safety. APOL1 genotyping in donors with recent African ancestry is considered. Based on current data, transplant physicians should discuss APOL1 genotyping with potential living kidney donors self-reporting recent African ancestry. Until results from APOL1 Long-term Kidney Transplant Outcomes Network ancillary studies are available, we present practical approaches from our experience for considering APOL1 genotyping in the living donor evaluation. Transplant physicians should inform potential living kidney donors at risk for APOL1-associated nephropathy about the gene and possibility of genetic testing early in the donor evaluation, well before scheduling the donor nephrectomy. Transplant programs must weigh risks of performing a donor nephrectomy in those with 2 APOL1 renal risk variants (high-risk genotypes), particularly younger individuals. Our program counsels kidney donors with APOL1 high-risk genotypes in the same fashion as with risk genotypes in other nephropathy genes. Because most African American kidney donor candidates lacking hypertension, proteinuria and reduced kidney function after workup will not possess APOL1 high-risk genotypes, genetic testing is unlikely to markedly increase donor declines and may reassure donors with regard to their long-term kidney outcomes, potentially increasing the number of African American donors.

Long-Term Kidney Transplant Outcomes: Role of Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus

Tacrolimus has significantly improved outcomes for kidney transplant patients and remains the cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy. While improvements in short-term outcomes in transplantation have been achieved in recent years, maintaining long-term graft survival remains a challenge in kidney transplantation.Minimizing risk factors for poor long-term kidney graft function and survival, and modifying tacrolimus regimens in the early and maintenance phases post-transplantation are essential to maintain long-term kidney transplant outcomes. Tacrolimus has a narrow therapeutic window, resulting in a tightly defined range of optimal drug exposure. Underimmunosuppression is associated with long-term risks, such as the development of donor-specific antibodies and antibody-mediated rejection, with a high possibility of a decline in kidney function and progression to graft failure. Conversely, prolonged overimmunosuppression carries a risk of drug-related adverse events.This review provides an overview of the differences in the formulation, delivery, and pharmacokinetic profiles between immediate- and prolonged-release tacrolimus and evaluates the effect of prolonged-release tacrolimus on the risk factors for poor outcomes in kidney transplantation. Recent evidence is used to provide guidance on target tacrolimus trough levels in the early and maintenance phases post-transplantation, with a view to improving long-term kidney graft function.

APOL1 Long-term Kidney Transplantation Outcomes Network (APOLLO): Design and Rationale

IntroductionMuch of the higher risk for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in African American individuals relates to ancestry-specific variation in the apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1). Relative to kidneys from European American deceased-donors, kidneys from African American deceased-donors have shorter allograft survival and African American living-kidney donors more often develop ESKD. The National Institutes of Health (NIH)–sponsored APOL1 Long-term Kidney Transplantation Outcomes Network (APOLLO) is prospectively assessing kidney allograft survival from donors with recent African ancestry based on donor and recipient APOL1 genotypes.MethodsAPOLLO will evaluate outcomes from 2614 deceased kidney donor-recipient pairs, as well as additional living-kidney donor-recipient pairs and unpaired deceased-donor kidneys.ResultsThe United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), Association of Organ Procurement Organizations, American Society of Transplantation, American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, and nearly all U.S. kidney transplant programs, organ procurement organizations (OPOs), and histocompatibility laboratories are participating in this observational study. APOLLO employs a central institutional review board (cIRB) and maintains voluntary partnerships with OPOs and histocompatibility laboratories. A Community Advisory Council composed of African American individuals with a personal or family history of kidney disease has advised the NIH Project Office and Steering Committee since inception. UNOS is providing data for outcome analyses.ConclusionThis article describes unique aspects of the protocol, design, and performance of APOLLO. Results will guide use of APOL1 genotypic data to improve the assessment of quality in deceased-donor kidneys and could increase numbers of transplanted kidneys, reduce rates of discard, and improve the safety of living-kidney donation.

Long-term outcomes of pediatric kidney transplantation: A single-center experience over the past 34years in Japan.

To evaluate long-term outcomes and risk factors for graft loss in pediatric kidney transplantation over a 30-year period. We retrospectively assessed 400 consecutive kidney transplants carried out in 377 children during 1975-2009. Patients were stratified according to the immunosuppressive regimen (era1: methylprednisolone and azathioprine; era2: calcineurin inhibitor-based therapy, including methylprednisolone and azathioprine or mizoribine; era3: basiliximab induction therapy, including calcineurin inhibitors, methylprednisolone and mycophenolate mofetil). The median age and bodyweight at transplantation were 9.7years and 20.6kg, respectively. In total, 364 (91.0%) children received a living related donor transplantation. The acute rejection rate within 1year post-transplant decreased significantly from 61.0% in era1 to 14.5% in era3 (P<0.001). For transplant eras1-3, 1-year graft survival was 81%, 93% and 95%; 5-year graft survival was 66%, 86% and 93%; and 10-year graft survival was 47%, 79% and 89%, respectively. The overall 5-, 10- and 20-year patient survival rates were 96%, 93% and 88%, respectively. A Cox multivariate analysis identified cold ischemia time (hazard ratio 1.385, 95% confidence interval 1.251-1.603), acute rejection (hazard ratio 1.682, 95% confidence interval 1.547-3.842), re-transplant (hazard ratio 2.680, 95% confidence interval 1.759-3.982) and donor type (hazard ratio 2.957, 95% confidence interval 1.754-4.691) as independent risk factors for graft loss at 10years post-transplant. The progress of immunosuppressive therapy has led to a low incidence of acute rejection and a high graft survival rate across 30years of pediatric transplantation.

Winning the War on Kidney Disease: Perspective from the American Society of Nephrology.

Nephrology is unique. Having saved the lives of millions of people with kidney failure and advocated successfully for the federal government to cover every American on dialysis, the specialty now faces challenges that obstruct advances in care and innovation. More than one half of Americans who

Non-HLA donor-recipient mismatches in kidney transplantation-A stone left unturned.

In kidney transplantation, short-term allograft survival has improved due to improvements in acute rejection episodes without corresponding improvements in long-term survival. Although current organ allocation algorithms take into account human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching to reduce antidonor alloimmune responses, it is likely that genomic variation at non-HLA loci (ie, non-HLA donor-recipient [D-R] pair mismatches) play a role in the "non-self" responses and ultimately affect long-term allograft survival. Existing data from both animal models and human studies suggest an association between non-HLA D-R mismatches and kidney allograft outcomes. In this minireview, we examine existing and emerging data and discuss putative mechanisms on the role of non-HLA D-R mismatches on long-term allograft outcomes in kidney transplantation.

Trough Level of Mycophenolic Acid Did Not Affect De Novo DSA Development in Kidney Transplantation

IntroductionMycophenolate mofetil has improved long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation. However, the impact of mycophenolic acid (MPA) trough level on the development of de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (DSA) is unclear. We examined the relation between MPA trough level and de novo DSA development. MethodWe retrospectively studied 617 kidney recipients whose MPA trough level and de novo DSA data were available. All patients underwent primary kidney transplant from living donors from 2008 to 2014, and were chronically treated with a calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil, and +/- steroids. They were equally divided into 4 groups according to the mean trough level of MPA (mMPA) at 1 year post-transplantation: Group 1, mMPA < 2.14 ng/mL (n = 152); Group 2, mMPA 2.14-2.83 ng/mL (n = 157); Group 3, mMPA 2.83-3.57 ng/mL (n = 153); and Group 4, mMPA ≥ 3.57 ng/mL (n = 155). The groups were compared by incidence rate of de novo DSA, graft survival rate, and renal function. ResultsThe incidence rates of de novo DSA were 33.3% in Group 1, 23.7% in Group 2, 22.9% in Group 3, and 30.3% in Group 4 (P = .158). Although there was no significant difference in graft survival rates, a significant difference of renal functions was noted: the higher the renal function, the lower the MPA trough level. ConclusionThe mMPA trough level at 1 year post-transplantation was not statistically associated with the incidence rate of de novo DSA after kidney transplantation.

Long-term Results of Kidney Transplantation in Patients With Familial Mediterranean Fever and Amyloidosis

IntroductionAmyloid A amyloidosis is most commonly caused by familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) in Turkey. Amyloidosis secondary to FMF is an important cause of end-stage renal failure, and kidney transplantation (KT) in these cases can be complicated, with long-term results oftentimes inferior compared with organ transplant in patients without FMF. The present study aims to show the long-term results of patients with secondary amyloidosis caused by FMF undergoing KT . MethodsWe enrolled 27 patients with a history of FMF amyloidosis undergoing KT and a control group of 614 patients undergoing KT between 2005 and 2018 at Ankara University Medical School. All data were recorded retrospectively from patients files. ResultsTwenty-two patients (81.5%) were treated with triple immunosuppressive therapy consisting of mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and a steroid; 5 patients (18.5%) were treated with tacrolimus, azathioprine, and prednisolone. Acute cellular rejection was seen in 3 patients (11.1%), and acute cellular- and antibody-mediated rejection occurred in 1 patient (3.7%). During the follow-up period, graft loss due to acute cellular rejection was observed in only 1 patient. One patient was lost to follow-up.

Long-term outcome of kidney transplantation in patients with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract

Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) are a leading cause of end-stage kidney failure in the young. However, there is limited information on long-term outcomes after kidney transplantation in this group. We explored the outcomes of kidney transplant in patients with the 3 most common severe forms of CAKUT: posterior urethral valves (PUV), reflux nephropathy and renal hypoplasia/dysplasia. Data were extracted from the Australian & New Zealand Dialysis & Transplant Registry on first kidney transplants performed between 1985 and 2015 in recipients with a primary diagnosis of PUV, renal hypoplasia/dysplasia or reflux nephropathy (under the age of 30years). Using multivariate Cox regression, we compared death-censored graft survival between the three groups. One hundred twenty-seven patients with PUV, 245 with hypoplasia/dysplasia and 727 with reflux nephropathy were included. A 10-year graft survival in PUV, hypoplasia/dysplasia and reflux nephropathy was 70%, 76% and 70%, respectively and a 20-year graft survival was 30%, 53% and 49%. After adjusting for age at transplant, graft source and HLA matching, there was evidence for poorer graft survival in PUV (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.38). Graft survival of the first transplant in CAKUT is favourable at 10years; however, recipients with PUV have increased risk of graft loss beyond a 10-year post-transplant, which may be related to bladder dysfunction.

APOL1 high-risk genotypes and renal transplantation.

The discovery of apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) gene variants and its association with kidney disease in African-Americans represent a significant breakthrough in understanding the genetic basis of ancestry-based differences in a public health problem. The role these variants play in renal transplantation is still incompletely understood. This article reviews the epidemiologic data and current reports of APOL1 variant pathogenesis in transplantation. We examine existing data on outcomes in APOL1 high-risk kidneys, high-risk APOL1 recipients, live donors with high-risk mutations and non-renal transplantation of high-risk APOL1 organs. We discuss the rapidly evolving role and potential pros and cons of APOL1 genotyping of donors and recipients in transplantation. Finally, we highlight the ongoing nationwide National Institutes of Health-sponsored "APOL1 Long-term Kidney Transplantation Outcomes (APOLLO)" study, which will quantify outcomes and "second hits" in pertinent to APOL1 high-risk variants in renal transplantation.

Outcome of kidney transplantation with graft from intracerebral hemorrhage donors

Objective: To analyze the data of kidney transplantation with allografts from intracerebral hemorrhage donors of China donation after citizen's death (CDCD) and provide evidence to guide the clinical practice. Methods: The clinical data of CDCD donors (age ≥10 years)and corresponding kidney allograft recipients, which were done by Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University during January 1 2013 to December 31 2017, were analyzed retrospectively. Results: 327 CDCD cases were analyzed, the number and percentage of intracerebral hemorrhage donors were gradually increasing and the percentage reached to 39.5% in 2017. The discarding rateof kidney allografts donated by intracerebral hemorrhage donors was higher than those donated by non-intracerebral hemorrhage donors, but intracerebral hemorrhage donor may not be a risk factor for DGF after the rigorous evaluation of kidney allografts. For 145 primary recipients transplanted in 2016 and had a 22±4 month follow-up, the recipients accepted the kidney from intracerebral hemorrhage donors had a higher level of serum creatinine[(130±60)μmol/L vs (111±38) μmol/L,P<0.05]and a lower eGFR[(61±23) ml·min(-1)·(1.73m(2))(-1) vs (70±23) ml·min(-1)·(1.73m(2))(-1),P<0.05] compared to the recipients accepted the kidney from non-intracerebral hemorrhage donors. Conclusion: The number and percentage of organ donation from intracerebral hemorrhage donor is increasing, but the intracerebral hemorrhage donor may be a risk factor for long-term outcome of kidney transplantation.

Mechanisms of Injury in APOL1-associated Kidney Disease.

An improved understanding of the pathogenesis in apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) gene-associated chronic kidney disease (CKD) arose from observations in kidney transplantation. APOL1 genotyping could soon improve the safety of living kidney donation in individuals with recent African ancestry and alter the allocation of deceased donor kidneys. This article reviews the potential mechanisms that underlie development of APOL1-associated nephropathy. Roles for circulating APOL1 protein versus intrinsic renal expression of APOL1 are discussed, as well as the requirement for modifying genetic and/or environmental factors. Abundant evidence supports local kidney production of APOL1 renal-risk variant protein in the development of nephropathy; this is true in both native kidney disease and after renal transplantation. Only a minority of kidneys from individuals with APOL1 high-risk genotypes will develop CKD or manifest shorter renal allograft survival after transplantation. Therefore, modifying factors that explain why only a subset of kidneys develops nephropathy remain critical to identify. It appears likely that environmental exposures, as opposed to major APOL1-second gene interactions, will prove to be stronger modifiers of the risk for nephropathy. The evolving understanding of the pathogenesis in APOL1-associated nephropathy will identify biomarkers predicting nephropathy in individuals at high genetic risk and lead to novel therapies to prevent or slow native CKD progression and prolong survival of transplanted kidneys. In the interim, the National Institutes of Health-sponsored "APOL1 Long-term Kidney Transplantation Outcomes" Network will determine whether APOL1 genotyping in individuals with recent African ancestry improves outcomes and safety in kidney transplantation.

Reassessing the risk of kidney organ donation: Researchers are taking a closer look at the long-term health risks that living kidney donors may face to refine the informed consent process and improve follow-up care.

Reassessing the risk of kidney organ donation: Researchers are taking a closer look at the long-term health risks that living kidney donors may face to refine the informed consent process and improve follow-up care.

Long-term outcome of third, fourth and fifth kidney transplantation: technical aspects and immunological challenges.

BackgroundThe number of patients on waiting lists for repeated kidney transplantation has increased. However, retransplanted patients have a greater surgical and immunological risk than first-time kidney recipients.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed all kidney recipients that underwent third, fourth or fifth kidney transplantation (Group 3+) at the University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany from October 1973 to January 2017. A historical cohort of recipients retransplanted with a second kidney (Group 2) served as the control. Donor and recipient demographic data, cold ischaemia time (CIT), warm ischaemia time, overall operation time and methods, transplantectomy of previous kidney grafts, incidence of surgical and immunological complications as well as patient- and death-censored survival were analysed.ResultsWe identified 108 recipients transplanted with the third, fourth or fifth renal allograft. Patients with more than one transplantation had significantly higher surgical risk due to atherosclerosis (P = 0.002) and higher immunological risk due to higher panel reactive antibody levels preoperatively (current panel reactive antibody P = 0.004; highest panel reactive antibody value P = 0.0001). Group 3+ patients had more often undergone previous transplant nephrectomy (P = 0.0001). There was a significant difference in CIT (P = 0.009), overall operative time (P = 0.0001) and post-transplantation thrombotic events (P = 0.02). We could not demonstrate any differences in graft and patient survival.ConclusionThird, fourth and fifth transplant recipients are a high-risk patient cohort. Our results suggest that patient survival after more than three renal transplantations is similar to that of second graft recipients. This supports the concept of repeated kidney retransplantations.

Uncontrolled donation after circulatory death: A cohort study of data from a long-standing deceased-donor kidney transplantation program.

Despite good long-term outcomes of kidney transplants from controlled donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors, there are few uncontrolled DCD (uDCD) programs. This longitudinal study compares outcomes for all uDCD (N=774) and all donation after brain death (DBD) (N=613) kidney transplants performed from 1996 to 2015 at our center. DBD transplants were divided into those from standard-criteria (SCD) (N=366) and expanded-criteria (N=247) brain-dead donors (ECD). One-, 5-, and 10-year graft survival rates were 91.7%, 85.7%, and 80.6% for SCD; 86.0%, 75.8%, and 61.4% for ECD; and 85.1%, 78.1%, and 72.2% for uDCD, respectively. Graft survival was worse in recipients of uDCD kidneys than of SCD (P=.004) but better than in transplants from ECD (P=.021). The main cause of graft loss in the uDCD transplants was primary nonfunction. Through logistic regression, donor death due to pulmonary embolism (OR 4.31, 95% CI 1.65-11.23), extrahospital CPR time ≥75minutes (OR1.94, 95%CI 1.18-3.22), and in-hospital CPR time ≥50minutes (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.09-2.93) emerged as predictive factors of primary nonunction. According to the outcomes of our long-standing kidney transplantation program, uDCD could help expand the kidney donor pool.

Furosemide Stress Test as a Predicting Biomarker for Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplantation

Background: Delayed graft function (DGF) could worsen early and long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation (KT). DGF is caused by several pre-transplantation and perioperative factors in both donors and recipients. At present, there are no biomarkers or tests during the immediate post-KT period that can accurately predict the development of DGF. Materials and methods: This prospective study was conducted in deceased donor KT (DDKT) at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thailand. All recipients underwent furosemide stress test (FST) by receiving a single dose of intravenous furosemide, 1.5 mg/kg at 3 h after allograft reperfusion. We determined the correlations between DGF (requiring dialysis within the first week after transplantation) and the values of urine volume recorded hourly after FST until 6 h, the parameters of postoperative dynamic tests, including resistive index (RI) of renal arteries and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF), and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). Results: Of the 59 total DDKT recipients enrolled, 24 developed DGF. The FST is a more accurate biomarker than urine NGAL, RI of renal arteries, and ERPF in the prediction of DGF. The 4-h urine volume less than 350 mL (FST non-responsive) was the best cut-off value in predicting DGF with 87.5% sensitivity, 82.9% specificity, and 82.5% accuracy. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed an odds ratio of 0.993 (0.986–0.999, p = 0.035) for the 4-h urine volume to predict DGF. Conclusions: The FST is a simple and accurate biomarker for predicting DGF in early post-KT period. Close monitoring and well prepared dialysis are suggested in patients with urine volume < 350 mL after 4 h of FST. The FST non-responsive patients could be the target for further DGF preventive intervention. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03071536.

Is preimplantation renal biopsy essential prior to deceased donor renal transplant?

The striking discrepancy in the number of end-stage renal disease patients added to the transplant wait list and the shortage of standard criteria donors has stimulated the development of strategies aimed to expand acceptance criteria from marginal deceased donors. Renal biopsy done before transplant will be useful to predict short- and long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation. It also serves as a reference in interpretation of subsequent biopsies. It also helps in deciding whether it should be discarded. However, systemic reviews concluded that there was no consistent association between donor biopsy findings and posttransplant outcomes. A well-designed randomized control trial could ascertain the extent of procurement biopsy leading to discards, whether outcomes are indeed better when preimplantation biopsies are used to justify declining kidneys for transplantation.

Pediatric kidney transplantation: early and long-term outcomes following 1187 procedures

To estimate short- and long-term outcomes of pediatric kidney transplants in Russia considering the maximum available number of cases. Retrospective, observational, multi-center study included data about 1187 kidney transplantation procedures (866 - deceased donor, 281 - living donor and 40 - AB0-incompatible living donor) performed in 1065 patients (age 0-17 years) since 1990 till 2017. Patient and graft survival, causes of recipient deaths and graft losses, as well as, the influence of donor type, blood group incompatibility and recipient age on outcomes were analyzed. Results of redo transplantations (n=131) were also investigated. Annual, 5- , 10- , and 15-year survival of patient was 94, 86, 79 and 69%, respectively; graft survival - 85, 67, 53 and 33%, respectively. Transplantation from related donors including AB0-incompatible cases was associated with 15-30% increase of graft survival (p<0.0001). Up to 23% of children required redo transplantation within 4-5 years after primary procedure and 2/3 of patients - after 10-15 years. There were no significant differences in outcomes after primary and redo procedures: annual, 5-, 10- and 15-year graft survival was 85, 68, 55, 42 and 85, 62, 45, 19%, respectively (p=0.1164). It is reasonable to consider the outcomes of transplantations as satisfactory in Russia. However, there is a great potential for improvement. The main problems are high incidence of infectious complications followed by fatal outcomes (41% of all fatal outcomes) and loss of allograft due to primary dysfunction and death of recipients with functioning allografts (19 and 23%, respectively). Primary use of living-related donors for pediatric kidney transplantation seems to be the most effective way to improve both short- and long-term outcomes.

Long-term outcome of kidney transplantation in AL amyloidosis

Therapies for AL amyloidosis have dramatically improved, leading to longer patient survival; however, more AL amyloidosis patients are reaching end-stage renal disease (ESRD). There are no clear guidelines regarding eligibility for kidney transplantation in patients with AL amyloidosis, and data on outcomes are limited. We evaluated the clinical and laboratory data of 49 patients who were followed in the Amyloidosis Center at Boston University and underwent kidney transplantation at a center in the United States between 1987-2017. During a median follow-up of 7.2 years (range 0-19), the median patient survival from diagnosis was 15.4 years, and from kidney transplantation was 10.5 years. One, three, and five-year graft survival were 94%, 89%, and 81%, respectively. Patients with hematologic complete response or very good partial response prior to kidney transplantation had significantly better patient survival than patients with partial response or no response, and the median time to graft loss was 10.4 years versus 5.5 years, respectively. This is the largest published series of kidney transplantation in patients with AL amyloidosis, suggesting that kidney transplantation can have a good outcome in carefully selected patients, particularly in those who have achieved a complete response or very good partial response at the time of kidney transplantation.