Long-term Prostate Cancer Survivors Research Articles

Urethral Pain Among Prostate Cancer Survivors 1 to 14 Years After Radiation Therapy

To investigate how treatment-related and non-treatment-related factors impact urethral pain among long-term prostate cancer survivors. Men treated for prostate cancer with radiation therapy at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Göteborg, Sweden from 1993 to 2006 were approached with a study-specific postal questionnaire addressing symptoms after treatment, including urethral burning pain during urination (n=985). The men had received primary or salvage external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or EBRT in combination with brachytherapy (BT). Prescribed doses were commonly 70 Gy in 2.0-Gy fractions for primary and salvage EBRT and 50 Gy plus 2×10.0 Gy for EBRT+BT. Prostatic urethral doses were assessed from treatment records. We also recruited 350 non-pelvic-irradiated, population-based controls matched for age and residency to provide symptom background rates. Of the treated men, 16% (137 of 863) reported urethral pain, compared with 11% (27 of 242) of the controls. The median time to follow-up was 5.2 years (range, 1.1-14.3 years). Prostatic urethral doses were similar to prescription doses for EBRT and 100% to 115% for BT. Fractionation-corrected dose and time to follow-up affected the occurrence of the symptom. For a follow-up≥3 years, 19% of men (52 of 268) within the 70-Gy EBRT+BT group reported pain, compared with 10% of men (23 of 222) treated with 70 Gy primary EBRT (prevalence ratio 1.9; 95% confidence interval 1.2-3.0). Of the men treated with salvage EBRT, 10% (20 of 197) reported urethral pain. Survivors treated with EBRT+BT had a higher risk for urethral pain compared with those treated with EBRT. The symptom prevalence decreased with longer time to follow-up. We found a relationship between fractionation-corrected urethral dose and pain. Among long-term prostate cancer survivors, the occurrence of pain was not increased above the background rate for prostatic urethral doses up to 70 Gy3.

Dietary Patterns Differ between Urban and Rural Older, Long-Term Survivors of Breast, Prostate, and Colorectal Cancer and Are Associated with Body Mass Index

BackgroundOlder adult cancer survivors are at greater risk of cancer recurrence and other comorbidities that can be prevented through improved diet and weight management. The tertiary prevention needs of rural-dwelling survivors can be even greater, yet little is known about rural and urban differences in lifestyle factors among this high-risk population. ObjectivesTo compare dietary patterns of urban and rural cancer survivors and to examine associations of dietary patterns with body mass index (BMI). DesignA secondary analysis was performed of baseline data from the Reach Out to Enhance Wellness (RENEW) trial, a diet and exercise intervention among overweight, long-term (≥5 years), older survivors of colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer. Survivors in the present analysis (n=729) underwent two 45- to 60-minute telephone surveys, which included two 24-hour dietary recalls. Principal components analysis and multivariable general linear models were used to derive dietary patterns and to evaluate associations between dietary patterns and BMI, respectively. ResultsPrincipal components analysis identified three primary dietary patterns among rural dwellers (high sweets and starches, high reduced-fat dairy, cereal, nuts, and fruits, and mixed) and three among urban dwellers (high fruits and vegetables, high meat and refined grains, and high sugar-sweetened beverages). Among rural survivors, greater adherence to the high reduced-fat dairy, cereal, nuts, and fruits pattern was positively associated with lower BMI (P trend <0.05), whereas higher scores on the mixed pattern was associated with greater BMI (P trend <0.05). Greater adherence to the high fruits and vegetables pattern among urban survivors was inversely associated with BMI (P trend <0.05). ConclusionsUrban and rural differences in dietary intake behavior should be considered in designing public health interventions among the increasing population of older cancer survivors. In addition, targeting overall dietary patterns might be one approach to help reduce the burden of obesity among this population.

Potential predictors of fear of progression among long-term prostate cancer survivors: Do illness perceptions and family history matter?

e15157 Background: Fear of illness progression (FoP) or recurrence is known to be one of the most prominent fears in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) even years after treatment. To improve detection of men at risk, possible predictors need to be discovered. So far, little is known about the influence of patients' illness perceptions (IP) and family history on dysfunctional FoP (dysFoP). Methods: A nationwide mail survey was sent out to a total of 6.305 men who had been treated with radical prostatectomy. Median time since diagnosis was 7.4 years. Patients were divided into 2 subgroups according to their family history: 68.9% (n=4.341) sporadic and 31.1% (n=1.964) familial (at least 1 first-degree relative with PCa). FoP was assessed with the short form of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire (FoP-Q-SF), IP were assessed with the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ). We also evaluated sociodemographic and clinical parameters and their influence on FoP. Results: Dysfunctional FoP was identified in 3.4% of all patients. Patients worried most about family, being dependent on others, and whether the children would also be diagnosed with PCa. Younger age, worse subjective economic situation, shorter time since diagnosis and disease progression were significantly associated with dysFoP (p&lt;.01). IP and prevalence of dysFoP did not differ significantly between patients with sporadic and familial PCa, but familial PCa was associated with a higher mean level of FoP. IP explained a high amount of variance in FoP (R²=.435). Stronger perceptions of worry and negative emotions were significant predictors of FoP (p&lt;.001). Furthermore, having at least one son (p=.004), time since diagnosis &lt;5 years (p=.006) and worse subjective economic situation (p=.030) were predictive of dysFoP. Conclusions: In this study only a minority of patients reported dysFoP. The study findings suggest the importance of addressing IP, especially worries, negative emotions, and perceived consequences as key factors of FoP. Prevalence of dysFoP did not differ depending on family history, however patients with familial PCa showed higher mean levels of FoP.

674 Fear of progression among long-term prostate cancer survivors: Illness perceptions, patients' presumed cause of prostate cancer and family history as potential predictors

674 Fear of progression among long-term prostate cancer survivors: Illness perceptions, patients' presumed cause of prostate cancer and family history as potential predictors

A qualitative study of unmet needs and interactions with primary care among cancer survivors

Introduction:Despite increasing numbers, there is little research investigating the long-term needs of cancer survivors. The aim of this study is to explore the experiences of individuals who have survived at least 5 years following a cancer diagnosis, and to describe perceived unmet needs and interactions with primary care.Methods:Forty long-term survivors of breast, colorectal and prostate cancer were purposively selected for an in-depth qualitative study. We aimed for a maximum variation sample according to cancer site, gender, time since diagnosis, cancer needs, anxiety and depression. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were coded thematically using a grounded theory approach.Results:Analysis of the interview data is presented in four subthemes: the role they perceived for the general practitioner (GP), unmet needs, reasons for not using primary care for needs they perceived as cancer related, and ongoing care for cancer-related issues. The majority of cancer survivors did not see a role for their GP in their long-term care related to their cancer diagnosis as most considered that they did not need active follow-up, but some expressed a need for psychological services and information on possible long-term effects. Cancer survivors cited three main reasons for not using GP services in relation to their cancer diagnosis: GPs were seen as non-experts in cancer; they were perceived as too busy; and a lack of continuity within primary care made it difficult to talk about long-term issues. There was a wide variation in schedules and notification of PSA tests among the prostate cancer survivors.Discussion:The results from this project suggest that some cancer survivors have specific emotional and physical needs that could benefit from input from their primary care team, but not all cancer survivors look to their GP for their long-term cancer-related care. Better information care planning is required from specialists in order to identify those who would benefit most.

Abstract ED02-04: Intersection of cancer, aging, and survivorship

Abstract Cancer is a disease associated with aging, with approximately 60% of cancer diagnoses occurring in patients age 65 and older. Of 10.8 million cancer survivors in the US, approximately 6.8 million are age 65 or older. With the aging of the baby boomer population and rises in life expectancy, the number of cancer cases and the number of cancer survivors is anticipated to grow over the coming decades.1 Optimal care of this growing population of older adult cancer survivors will require an understanding of the interaction between cancer, cancer therapy, and the aging process. In particular there is a gap in knowledge regarding whether cancer and/or cancer treatment accelerates the aging process, and if so whether the accelerated aging is transient or permanent. This lecture will provide an overview of the available data regarding the intersection between aging and survivorship, as well as specific considerations in the assessment and treatment of older adult survivors. Cancer and cancer treatment has a potential long term impact on the health status and physical function of older adults.2–3 The Health and Retirement study evaluated the health and functional status of older cancer survivors in comparison to controls. Older cancer survivors were less likely to report excellent or good health (P&amp;lt;0.001), reported more mobility limitations (P&amp;lt;0.001), and reported more limitations with activities of daily living (P=0.01). Among older cancer survivors, obesity, lack of exercise, and poor diet are associated with a poorer quality of life.4 A randomized study tested the benefits of an exercise and diet intervention in older cancer survivors and demonstrated that the intervention was associated with a decrease in self-reported functional decline.5 Older cancer survivors have an increased number of comorbid conditions in comparison to individuals without a history of cancer.2 The NIA/NCI Collaborative Study on Cancer and Comorbidity in the Elderly provided summary data on the comorbidity of 7,600 patients age 55 and older with a history of cancer. The most common comorbid conditions included hypertension (43%), heart conditions (39%) and arthritis (35%).6 Patients may be at increased risk for specific comorbid conditions based on their preexisting comorbid conditions and the therapeutic exposures received. For example, therapy with doxorubicin is associated with an increased risk of congestive heart failure and cardiomyopathy.7–8 Risk factors include a history of diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and hypertension. Therapy with an aromatase inhibitor is associated with a loss in bone mineral density and this risk is most pronounced in patients with pre-existing bone loss.9 These examples highlight the need to better understand the association between a history of cancer, patient characteristics (including pre-existing comorbid conditions), specific therapeutic exposure, and the subsequent development or acceleration of comorbid conditions. Although our knowledge of the potential survivorship issues facing older adults is growing, several gaps in knowledge remain.10 As the number of cancer survivors is on the rise, it is critical to improve our evidence-based knowledge to identify and reduce the risk of late side effects from treatment. Prospective longitudinal studies of the long term impact of cancer therapies and interventions to decrease the risk are needed.

The supportive care needs of the partners and family members of long-term survivors of breast, colorectal and prostate cancer

Introduction and aimsThere are an estimated 2 million cancer survivors in the UK today, with earlier diagnosis and improved treatments leading to an increasing number of long-term survivors. Partners and/or...

Long-term Prostate Cancer Survivors With Low Socioeconomic Status Reported Worse Mental Health–related Quality of Life in a Population-based Study

To explore whether socioeconomic status (SES) was associated with health-related quality of life (HRQL) and health care use among long-term prostate cancer survivors. Through urologists in the Comprehensive Cancer Center South, all 5- to 10-year prostate cancer survivors known in the Eindhoven Cancer Registry without disease progression were invited to complete the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index, and the Dutch sexual activities module. Multivariate linear regression assessed the effect of SES (based on home value and household income) on HRQL and health care use. Five-hundred eighty-four patients (response rate 81%) were included. Survivors with a low SES exhibited lower mental SF-36 scores (6-16 points on a 0-100 scale), independent of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics (P < .05), and hardly any differences in physical SF-36 subscales, sexual function, and urinary and bowel function and bother. Presence of serious comorbidity had a stronger predictive value for HRQL than SES. Health care use did not seem to be associated with SES. Prostate cancer survivors with a low SES exhibited a worse mental but not physical HRQL than those with a higher SES. Long-term health outcomes of patients with low SES may be maximized by paying extra attention to comorbid conditions.

Cancer screening and preventative care among long-term cancer survivors in the United Kingdom

Background:Long-term cancer survivors in the United Kingdom are mostly followed up in a primary care setting by their general practitioner; however, there is little research on the use of services. This study examines whether cancer survivors receive adequate screening and preventative care in UK primary care.Patients and methods:We identified a cohort of long-term survivors of breast, colorectal and prostate cancer with at least a 5-year survival using the General Practice Research Database, with controls matched for age, gender and practice. We compared adherence with cancer screening and the use of preventative care between cancer survivors and controls.Results:The cancer survivors’ cohort consisted of 18 612 breast, 5764 colorectal and 4868 prostate cancer survivors. Most cancer survivors receive cancer screening at the same levels as controls, except for breast cancer survivors who were less likely to receive a mammogram than controls (OR=0.78, 95% CI: 0.66–0.92). Long-term cancer survivors received comparable levels of influenza vaccinations and cholesterol tests, but breast (OR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.74–0.87) and prostate cancer survivors (OR=0.70, 95% CI: 0.57–0.87) were less likely to receive a blood pressure test. All survivors were more likely to receive bone densitometry.Conclusion:The provision and uptake of preventive care in a primary care setting in the United Kingdom is comparable between the survivors of three common cancers and those who have not had cancer. However, long-term breast cancer survivors in this cohort were less likely to receive a mammogram.

Associations between lifestyle factors and quality of life among older long-term breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors.

Older cancer survivors are at increased risk for secondary cancers, cardiovascular disease, obesity, and functional decline and, thus, may benefit from health-related interventions. However, to the authors' knowledge, little is known regarding the health behaviors of older cancer survivors and the associations of those behaviors with quality-of-life outcomes, especially during the long-term post-treatment period. In total, 753 older (aged > or =65 years) long-term survivors (> or =5 years postdiagnosis) of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer completed 2 baseline telephone interviews to assess their eligibility for a diet and exercise intervention trial. The interviews assessed exercise, diet, weight status, and quality of life. Older cancer survivors reported a median of 10 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous exercise per week, and only 7% had Healthy Eating Index scores >80 (indicative of healthful eating habits relative to national guidelines). Despite their suboptimal health behaviors, survivors reported mental and physical quality of life that exceeded age-related norms. Greater exercise and better diet quality were associated with better physical quality-of-life outcomes (eg, better vitality and physical functioning; P < .05), whereas greater body mass index was associated with reduced physical quality of life (P < .001). The current results indicated a high prevalence of suboptimal health behaviors among older, long-term survivors of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer who were interested in lifestyle modification. In addition, the findings pointed to the potential negative impact of obesity and the positive impact of physical activity and a healthy diet on physical quality of life in this population.

Effects of Home-Based Diet and Exercise on Functional Outcomes Among Older, Overweight Long-term Cancer Survivors

Five-year survival rates for early stage colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer currently exceed 90% and are increasing. Cancer survivors are at greater risk for second malignancies, other comorbidities, and accelerated functional decline. Lifestyle interventions may provide benefit, but it is unknown whether long-term cancer survivors can modify their lifestyle behaviors sufficiently to improve functional status. To determine whether a telephone counseling and mailed print material-based diet and exercise intervention is effective in reorienting functional decline in older, overweight cancer survivors. Randomized controlled trial of 641 overweight (body mass index > or = 25 and < 40), long-term (> or = 5 years) survivors (aged 65-91 years) of colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer, who were randomly assigned to an intervention group (n = 319) or delayed intervention (control) group (n = 322) in Canada, the United Kingdom, and 21 US states. Individuals were recruited for the Reach out to Enhance Wellness (RENEW) trial from July 1, 2005, through May 17, 2007. A 12-month, home-based tailored program of telephone counseling and mailed materials promoting exercise, improved diet quality, and modest weight loss. The control group was wait-listed for 12 months. Change in self-reported physical function on the Short-Form 36 physical function subscale (score range, 0-100; a high score indicates better functioning) from baseline to 12 months was the primary end point. Secondary outcomes included changes in function on the basic and advanced lower extremity function subscales of the Late Life Function and Disability Index (score range, 0-100), physical activity, body mass index, and overall health-related quality of life. The mean baseline Short-Form 36 physical function score was 75.7. At the 12-month follow-up, the mean function scores declined less rapidly in the intervention group (-2.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.36 to -3.93) compared with the control group (-4.84; 95% CI, -3.04 to -6.63) (P = .03). The mean baseline basic lower extremity function score was 78.2. The mean changes in basic lower extremity function were 0.34 (95% CI, -0.84 to 1.52) in the intervention group compared with -1.89 (95% CI, -0.70 to -3.09) in the control group (P = .005). Physical activity, dietary behaviors, and overall quality of life increased significantly in the intervention group compared with the control group, and weight loss also was greater (2.06 kg [95% CI, 1.69 to 2.43 kg] vs 0.92 kg [95% CI, 0.51 to 1.33 kg], respectively; P < .001). Among older, long-term survivors of colorectal, breast, and prostate cancer, a diet and exercise intervention reduced the rate of self-reported functional decline compared with no intervention. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00303875.

Long‐term cancer survivors experience work changes after diagnosis: results of a population‐based study

Although cancer survivorship is increasing with improved diagnosis and treatments, few studies have explored employment changes and the factors related to this change among cancer survivors. Therefore, we aim to explore the prevalence of employment problems in long-term cancer survivors. In addition, we explored what patient or tumour characteristics predicted employment changes. All 1893 long-term survivors of prostate cancer, endometrial cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and Hodgkin's lymphoma diagnosed between 1989 and 1998 in the area of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre South, The Netherlands were included in a population-based cross-sectional survey. Response rate was 80% (n=1511). After excluding survivors without a job before diagnosis, 403 survivors remained; 197 (49%) experienced no changes in their work situation following cancer diagnosis, 69 (17%) were working fewer hours, and 137 (34%) stopped working or retired. A medium educational level was significant in reducing the risk of work changes. Being older, having more than one comorbid condition, being treated with chemotherapy, and disease progression were significant independent predictors of work changes after cancer. Experiencing work changes was associated with lower physical functioning but positively associated with social well-being. Long-term cancer survivors experience work changes after diagnosis and treatment, and clinical factors significantly predicted work change after cancer. As such, our study underscores the importance of rehabilitation programs in improving the return to work after cancer.

Reach out to ENhancE Wellness in Older Cancer Survivors (RENEW): design, methods and recruitment challenges of a home‐based exercise and diet intervention to improve physical function among long‐term survivors of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer

Cure rates for cancer are increasing, especially for breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer. Despite positive trends in survivorship, a cancer diagnosis can trigger accelerated functional decline that can threaten independence, reduce quality-of-life and increase healthcare costs, especially among the elderly who comprise the majority of survivors. Lifestyle interventions may hold promise in reorienting functional decline in older cancer survivors, but few studies have been conducted. We describe the design and methods of a randomized controlled trial, RENEW (Reach out to ENhancE Wellness), that tests whether a home-based multi-behavior intervention focused on exercise, and including a low saturated fat, plant-based diet, would improve physical functioning among 641 older, long-term (>or=5 years post-diagnosis) survivors of breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer. Challenges to recruitment are examined. Twenty thousand and fifteen cases were approached, and screened using a two-step screening process to assure eligibility. This population of long-term, elderly cancer survivors had lower rates of response (approximately 11%) and higher rates of ineligibility (approximately 70%) than our previous intervention studies conducted on adults with newly diagnosed cancer. Significantly higher response rates were noted among survivors who were White, younger, and more proximal to diagnosis and breast cancer survivors (p-values<0.001). Older cancer survivors represent a vulnerable population for whom lifestyle interventions may hold promise. RENEW may provide guidance in allocating limited resources in order to maximize recruitment efforts aimed at this needy, but hard-to-reach population.

Characteristics of Long-term Survivors of Prostate Cancer after Conformal External Beam Radiotherapy

To report on initial patient and disease-related characteristics, as well as post-treatment tolerance profiles, among long-term survivors of prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

Dietary supplement use among elderly, long-term cancer survivors.

The purpose of the present study was to assess dietary supplement use and its association with micronutrient intakes and diet quality among older (>or=65 years), long-term survivors (>or=5 years post-diagnosis) of female breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer. The sample included 753 survivors who participated in telephone screening interviews to determine eligibility for a randomized diet and physical activity intervention trial entitled RENEW: Reach-out to ENhancE Wellness in Older Cancer Survivors. Telephone surveys included two 24-hour dietary recalls and items regarding supplement use (type, dose, and duration). Nutrient intakes were compared to Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs). Diet quality was assessed using the revised Healthy Eating Index (HEI). Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression were used in this cross-sectional study. A majority of survivors (74%) reported taking supplements, with multivitamins (60%), calcium/vitamin D (37%), and antioxidants (30%) as the most prevalent. Overall proportions of the total sample with dietary intakes below Estimated Average Requirements (EARs) were substantial, although supplement users had more favorable mean HEI scores (P < 0.01) and nutrient intakes for 12 of the 13 vitamins and minerals investigated (P values < 0.05). Supplement use was positively associated with older age (>or=70 years) (odds ratio (OR)=1.70; 95% confidence interval (95% CI)=1.17, 2.46) and female gender (OR=1.49; 95% CI=1.04, 2.13), and negatively associated with current smoking (OR=0.40, 95% CI=0.21, 0.76). Individuals scoring higher on the Total Fruit (OR=1.12, 95% CI=1.01, 1.23), Whole Grain (OR=1.14, 95% CI=1.04, 1.25), and Oil (OR=1.10, 95% CI=1.01, 1.11) components of the HEI were significantly more likely to take supplements, while those scoring higher on the Meat and Beans category (OR=0.81, 95% CI=0.71, 0.93) were significantly less likely to take supplements. Compared to those with less than a high school education, survivors with a professional or graduate degree were significantly more likely to use supplements (OR=2.18, 95% CI=1.13, 4.23). Demographic, disease, and health-related correlates of supplement use follow similar trends observed in the general population as well as previous reports from other cancer survivor populations. Supplement use may reduce the prevalence of nutrient inadequacies in this population, though survivors who use supplements are the least likely to need them. Supplement use may be an effective means for many survivors to achieve adequate nutrient intakes; however, open communication between healthcare providers and survivors is needed to ensure potential concerns are addressed as supplement use may not always be beneficial.

Spotlight

Spotlight

Bowel, Urinary, and Sexual Problems Among Long-Term Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Population-Based Study

To obtain insight into the long-term (5- to 10-year) effects of prostate cancer and treatment on bowel, urinary, and sexual function, we performed a population-based study. Prostate-specific function was compared with an age-matched normative population without prostate cancer. Through the population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry, we selected all men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1994 and 1998 in the southern Netherlands. In total, 964 patients, alive in November 2004, received questionnaire; 780 (81%) responded. Urinary problems were most common after a prostatectomy; bowel problems were most common after radiotherapy. Compared with an age-matched normative population both urinary and bowel functioning and bother were significantly worse among survivors. Urinary incontinence was reported by 23-48% of survivors compared with 4% of the normative population. Bowel leakage occurred in 5-14% of patients compared with 2% of norms. Erection problems occurred in 40-74% of patients compared with 18% of norms. These results form an important contribution to the limited information available on prostate-specific problems in the growing group of long-term prostate cancer survivors. Bowel, urinary, and sexual problems occur more often among long-term survivors compared with a reference group and cannot be explained merely by age. Because these problems persist for many years, urologists should provide patients with adequate information before treatment. After treatment, there should be an appropriate focus on these problems.

Health-related quality of life and health care utilisation among older long-term cancer survivors: A population-based study

Background The consequences of cancer and its treatment on health-related quality of life (HRQL) and health care utilisation among elderly long-term cancer survivors have rarely been studied. However, the impact can be different for older compared to younger patients due to the higher prevalence of comorbid diseases, a higher risk of treatment-related complications and because they often receive different therapies compared to younger patients. Therefore, this study addressed the following questions; do HRQL and health care utilisation differ between younger and elderly cancer survivors, and are those differences age or disease related. Methods A population-based, cross-sectional survey among 1893 long-term survivors of endometrial cancer, prostate cancer and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma was conducted using a cancer registry. HRQL was measured by the SF-36 and health care utilisation was measured with a self-reported questionnaire. Results were compared to a normative population. Patients with disease progression were excluded resulting in a total number of 1112 patients to be analysed. Results Young non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors (<70 years) reported lower vitality, bodily pain and general health compared to the normative population while older (⩾70 years) survivors did not differ from the norm. Young lymphoma survivors experienced better physical functioning compared to older survivors. Young endometrial cancer survivors experienced less bodily pain compared to the normative population while older survivors did not differ from the norm. Young endometrial cancer survivors experienced better physical and role functioning compared to older survivors. Young prostate cancer survivors reported less bodily pain compared to the norm while older survivors did not. Young prostate cancer survivors reported higher scores on physical functioning compared to older survivors. Age, comorbid diseases, educational level and current occupation influenced HRQL significantly. Both younger and older cancer survivors visited their medical specialist, but not their GP, significantly more often compared to the age-matched general Dutch population. Both younger and older cancer survivors only sporadically used additional care services after cancer treatment. Discussion HRQL of older and younger survivors is comparable, with the exception of physical functioning which is lower in older survivors. This difference in physical functioning was probably not caused by cancer because physical functioning among cancer survivors did not differ much compared to an age-matched normative population. Both younger and older long-term cancer survivors visited their medical specialist often but only sporadically used additional care services after cancer treatment.

Increased health care utilization among long‐term cancer survivors compared to the average Dutch population: A population‐based study

In the present study, self-reported health care utilization of cancer survivors is compared with those of an age- and gender-matched normative population and predictors of health care utilization are identified. A population-based, cross-sectional survey among 1893 long-term survivors of endometrial and prostate cancer and malignant lymphomas (Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's) diagnosed between 1989 and 1998 was conducted using the cancer registry of the Comprehensive Cancer Centre South. Cancer survivors visited their general practitioner somewhat more often compared to the age and gender-matched general Dutch population but this effect was not always statistically significant. In addition, they visited their medical specialist significantly more often. Survivors only sporadically (0-3%) visited or required a dietician, sexologist, oncology nurse, pastor, creative therapy or recovery program. Contact with a psychologist, physiotherapist and other cancer survivors took place somewhat more often. Patients visited a medical specialist less often if they were diagnosed with endometrial cancer (OR = 0.2; 95% CI = 0.1-0.5), if they were diagnosed between 10-15 years ago (OR = 0.6; 95% CI = 0.1-0.5) and if they were not married or divorced (OR = 0.5; 95% CI = 0.3-0.9). Contact with a psychologist was related to having a university or college degree (OR = 3.6; 95% CI = 1.3-9.4). Cancer survivors visited their specialist more often compared to the normative population. Changes in health care, such as less administrative work for the specialist and more efficiency, are probably necessary in order to cope adequately with the increasing demand on the system.

Functioning and Activity Participation Restrictions among Older Adult, Long-Term Cancer Survivors

This research examines how cancer and treatment sequelae combine with comorbidities to influence the physical functioning and activity participation restrictions reported by older adult (≥60), long-term survivors (5+ years) of breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer. The number of current comorbidities was the best predictor of functional difficulties and also a significant predictor of participation restrictions. Cancer stage at diagnosis and continuing cancer symptoms had direct effects on functional difficulties, and indirect effects through functional difficulties on participation restrictions. Clinicians working with older adult survivors need to be aware of the interplay between cancer and other health problems as they affect quality of life after cancer.