Long-term Care Homes Research Articles

Palliative End-of-Life Medication Prescribing Rates in Long-Term Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BackgroundMedications are often needed to manage distressing end-of-life symptoms (eg, pain, agitation). ObjectivesIn this study, we describe the variation in prescribing rates of symptom relief medications at the end of life among long-term care (LTC) decedents. We evaluate the extent these medications are prescribed in LTC homes and whether prescribing rates of end-of-life symptom management can be used as an indicator of quality end-of-life care. DesignRetrospective cohort study using administrative health data. Setting and ParticipantsLTC decedents in all 626 publicly funded LTC homes in Ontario, Canada, between January 1, 2017, and March 17, 2020. MethodsFor each LTC home, we measured the percent of decedents who received 1+ prescription(s) for a subcutaneous end-of-life symptom management medication (“end-of-life medication”) in their last 14 days of life. We then ranked LTC homes into quintiles based on prescribing rates. ResultsWe identified 55,916 LTC residents who died in LTC. On average, two-thirds of decedents (64.7%) in LTC homes were prescribed at least 1 subcutaneous end-of-life medication in the last 2 weeks of life. Opioids were the most common prescribed medication (overall average prescribing rate of 62.7%). LTC homes in the lowest prescribing quintile had a mean of 37.3% of decedents prescribed an end-of-life medication, and the highest quintile mean was 82.5%. In addition, across these quintiles, the lowest prescribing quintile had a high average (30.3%) of LTC residents transferred out of LTC in the 14 days compared with the highest prescribing quintile (12.7%). Conclusions and ImplicationsAcross Ontario's LTC homes, there are large differences in prescribing rates for subcutaneous end-of-life symptom relief medications. Although future work may elucidate why the variability exists, this study provides evidence that administrative data can provide valuable insight into the systemic delivery of end-of-life care.

Pilot Study on SAFE Score - A Novel Quantitative Metric for Evaluation of Patient Well-being in Crawfurd Hospital Transitional Care Facility (CFH TCF).

Crawfurd Hospital (CFH) set up a Transitional Care Facility (TCF) in November 2022 as an interim holding facility for medically stable patients awaiting a long-term discharge disposition. The team invented the SAFE score, to monitor 4 main domains commonly impacted in long-term stays - namely Skin, Action (Behaviour), Function and Emotion. A sample size of 50 patients met the inclusion criteria and were scored by the nurses on day 7, day 14, and monthly thereafter during their TCF stay, and once more within 72 h prior to their discharge. There was no significant improvement or worsening noted across all 4 domains in this pilot study, suggesting that the TCF has achieved its goal of maintaining its patients in all these domains. The scores at the various time points were also useful for the team to immediately identify changes in individual patient scores and act on these findings to ensure optimal patient care. Through this pilot study, we identified further minor improvements which can be made to the and the score, and such a scoring system may further be applicable to various intermediate to long-term care homes to oversee these domains of care.

The usability of virtual reality to train individuals in responding to behaviors related to dementia.

Dementia is associated with several behavioral changes globally referred to as Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD) of which many are recognized to be the expression of unmet needs triggered by environmental factors. BPSD are an extreme source of stress for family care partners and health care providers alike and can be the reason why people living with dementia (PLWD) are placed in long-term care homes (LTCH). The overall goal of this project was to examine whether a virtual environment that includes a virtual LTCH resident with dementia in a lifelike situation could be useful and usable for health care providers and care partners to identify potential triggers to BPSDs while being engaged emotionally with the scenario. Twenty-three health care professionals working with PLWD, 25 care partners to PLWD, 27 students in a health-related field, and 11 university/community college faculty members teaching courses relevant to gerontology tested the application which depicted a meal-time scenario. In addition to being asked about the behavioral triggers in the scene, participants were asked about the usefulness and usability of the tool for training. Presence and simulator sickness were also measured. Results suggest that participants generally felt present and emotionally engaged. They could identify the potential triggers for the observed behaviors in the virtual human with dementia as well as suggest some solutions. The majority (87% of participants) found the tool easy to use. Many participants identified the inability to interact with the virtual humans as a shortfall, and few reported mild to moderate levels of simulator sickness. As the behavioral changes associated with dementia can cause extreme stress for those interacting with PLWD, developing an effective and efficient training tool could significantly improve well-being for all involved. The investigators see the development and testing of an interactive version of this virtual environment as a next step in making this a clinically relevant training tool.

"Nobody But a Family Member Can Do It Quite the Same Way": Understanding the Meaning of Mealtimes to Residents and Families in Long-Term Care Homes During the Pandemic.

Meals in long-term care (LTC) are essential to residents not only for nutrition and their physical well-being but also for their social interactions supporting resident quality of life. This study aims to understand the mealtime experiences of residents and family care partners during the coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) pandemic when restrictions were put in place in LTC and retirement homes. Interpretive description analysis of qualitative interviews in LTC and retirement homes, with 17 family care partners and 4 residents. Convenience and snowball sampling was used to recruit participants for telephone interviews. Three themes were generated. Compromised mealtimes mean compromising community-meals were seen by participants as a key social and community-building event of the home; they reported this loss of community with pandemic restrictions. Participants noted that family care partners are indispensable at meals for social, psychological, and physical support. The dangers of eating alone spoke to the social isolation reported by participants that occurred during the pandemic and the risks they described of eating alone. This study confirms the importance of mealtimes in LTC and retirement homes to community building and extends our understanding of the importance of family inclusion at meals and why eating alone, as happened during COVID-19, was so detrimental to residents. Effort needs to be made to value this communal activity for the well-being of residents.

Geriatric care physicians' perspectives on providing virtual care: a reflexive thematic synthesis of their online survey responses from Ontario, Canada.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine was widely implemented to minimise viral spread. However, its use in the older adult patient population was not well understood. To understand the perspectives of geriatric care providers on using telemedicine with older adults through telephone, videoconferencing and eConsults. Qualitative online survey study. We recruited geriatric care physicians, defined as those certified in Geriatric Medicine, Care of the Elderly (family physicians with enhanced skills training) or who were the most responsible physician in a long-term care home, in Ontario, Canada between 22 December 2020 and 30 April 2021. We collected participants' perspectives on using telemedicine with older adults in their practice using an online survey. Two researchers jointly analysed free-text responses using the 6-phase reflexive thematic analysis. We recruited 29 participants. Participants identified difficulty using technology, patient sensory impairment, lack of hospital support and pre-existing high patient volumes as barriers against using telemedicine, whereas the presence of a caregiver and administrative support were facilitators. Perceived benefits of telemedicine included improved time efficiency, reduced travel, and provision of visual information through videoconferencing. Ultimately, participants felt telemedicine served various purposes in geriatric care, including improving accessibility of care, providing follow-up and obtaining collateral history. Main limitations are the absence of, or incomplete physical exams and cognitive testing. Geriatric care physicians identify a role for virtual care in their practice but acknowledge its limitations. Further work is required to ensure equitable access to virtual care for older adults.

Exploring the Role of Nurses in Advance Care Planning Within Long-Term Care Homes: A Qualitative Study.

Residents in long-term care homes (LTCHs) are often diagnosed with chronic, life-limiting illnesses, and it is now a common site to provide high levels of care and eventual death. There is an urgent need to address communication gaps and uncertainties surrounding resident's end of life preferences. Nurses are well situated to be key facilitators of necessary advance care planning (ACP), ensuring residents have discussions with family, substitute decision-makers and healthcare providers regarding future health and personal care preferences. However, LTCHs present unique challenges for nurses due to not only complex comorbidities but also staffing dynamics. This study explored the experiences and perceptions of Registered Nurses (RNs) and Registered Practical Nurse (RPNs) in LTCHs regarding their role in engaging residents and families in ACP discussions. Qualitative interpretive descriptive methodology was used. Data were collected from two LTCHs in Southern Ontario with a sample of 15 nurses (7 RNs and 8 RPNs). Analysis involved review of semistructured interviews, field notes, and utilizing constant comparison within an inductive approach. Power and authority dynamics in LTCH's was an overarching theme in the data, with four subthemes: (1) Nurses lacking clarity about ACP, (2) nurses' uncertainty regarding their role in ACP, (3) nurses feeling uncomfortable engaging in ACP discussions, and (4) nurses struggling to support families in ACP discussions. Recommendations for nurses, healthcare providers, LTCH administrators, and policy makers include: (1) development of policies which support, from a systemic level, nurses to feel safe while engaging in ACP; (2) reassessing LTCH's hierarchical structure, and clarifying RN, RPN, and interdisciplinary team members roles in ACP; (3) developing culture change that allows a team and person-centered approach to ACP; and (4) providing ongoing education and mentorship for nurses to manage family dynamics and expand their understanding of ACP beyond a biomedical lens.

'Confidence and fulfillment': a qualitative descriptive study exploring the impact of palliative care training for long-term care physicians and nurses.

To explore the impact of a 2-day, in-person interprofessional palliative care course for staff working in long-term care (LTC) homes. A qualitative descriptive study design was employed. LTC staff who had participated in Pallium Canada's Learning Essential Approaches to Palliative Care LTC Course in Ontario, Canada between 2017 and 2019 were approached. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, using an online videoconferencing platform in mid-2021 in Ontario, Canada. These were done online, recorded, and transcribed. Data were coded inductively. Ten persons were interviewed: four registered practical nurses, three registered nurses, one nurse practitioner, and two physicians. Some held leadership roles. Participants described ongoing impact on themselves and their ability to provide end-of-life (EOL) care (micro-level), their services and institutions (meso-level), and their healthcare systems (macro-level). At a micro-level, participants described increased knowledge and confidence to support residents and families, and increased work fulfillment. At the meso-level, their teams gained increased collective knowledge and greater interprofessional collaboration to provide palliative care. At the macro level, some participants connected with other LTC homes and external stakeholders to improve palliative care across the sector. Training provided much-needed preparedness to respond to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, including undertaking advance care planning and EOL conversations. The pandemic caused staff burnout and shortages, creating challenges to applying course learnings. The impact of palliative care training had ripple effects several years after completing the training, and equipped staff with key skills to provide care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Palliative care education of staff remains a critical element of an overall strategy to improve the integration of palliative care in LTC.

A Longitudinal Examination of Post-COVID-19 Mortality in Residents in Long-Term Care Homes

The most adverse outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic include high post-infection mortality among long-term care (LTC) home residents. Research about mortality over a longer period after contracting COVID-19 and in different pandemic years is limited. In the current study, we examined outcomes for 1,596 LTC residents from the day of a positive COVID-19 test until January 31, 2023. We reported all-cause mortality 30 days after contracting COVID-19 and monthly throughout the follow-up, up to 35 months after the pandemic start. We also examined mortality among 2,724 residents residing in the same LTC homes, with no history of COVID-19 during the same period. The results underscored a large number of deaths in the first month post-infection, with 30-day mortality substantially decreasing over the years—from 28% (95% CI [24.3, 31.8]) among residents contracting COVID-19 in 2020, to 8.3% (95% CI [7.4, 9.2]) in the 2022 cohort. Observed over longer periods, monthly mortality among residents with a COVID-19 history was similar to mortality in the No-COVID residents, and no evidence was found of increased mortality risk in the COVID group beyond the first post-infection month. We discuss mortality in LTC during the pandemic and a continuing need to reduce mortality in the acute phase of COVID-19.

Exploring Post-COVID-19 Functional Outcomes in Residents in Long-Term Care Homes in British Columbia, Canada.

Research on functional outcomes in long-term care (LTC) home residents after COVID-19 infection is limited. In the current study, we examined outcomes in 1,310 LTC residents with a positive COVID-19 test in the period from March 2020 to April 2022 ("COVID" group). We also reviewed outcomes in residents in the same LTC homes without a history of COVID-19 during the same period ("No-COVID" group, n = 2,301). In a retrospective longitudinal design, we explored activities of daily living (ADLs), cognitive function, and clinical care needs over time. Change was assessed from the last assessment before contracting COVID-19 to three assessments subsequent to COVID-19, over on average seven months after infection. We found deterioration over time in ADLs and cognitive performance in both groups. The change in ADLs and clinical care needs was slightly greater in the COVID than the No-COVID group from baseline to the first follow-up assessment; in subsequent assessments, the change was similar in both groups. Overall, we observed similar functional outcomes among surviving residents in the two groups, with initially greater deterioration in ADLs and clinical care needs in residents with a history of COVID-19 followed by a trajectory resembling the one in the No-COVID residents.

Health Provider Experiences in Supporting Social Connectedness Between Families and Older Adults Living in Long-Term Care Homes.

Many people, often older adults, living in long-term care homes (OA-LTCH) became socially isolated during the COVID-19 pandemic due to variable restrictions on in-person visits and challenges associated with using technology for social connectivity. Health providers were key to supporting these OA by providing additional care and facilitating their connections with family using technology such as smartphones and iPads. It is important to learn from these experiences to move forwards from the COVID-19 pandemic with evidence-informed strategies that will better position health providers to foster social engagement for OA-LTCH across a range of contextual situations. This exploratory qualitative description study sought to explore health provider experiences in supporting social connectedness between family members and OA-LTCH within the COVID-19 context. Qualitative, in-depth semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 health providers. Using inductive qualitative content analysis study findings were represented by the following themes: (a) changes in provider roles and responsibilities while challenging for health providers did not impact their commitment to supporting OA-LTCH social and emotional health, (b) a predominant focus on OA-LTCH physical well-being with resultant neglect for emotional well-being resulted in collective trauma, and (c) health providers faced multiple challenges in using technology to support social connectivity. Study findings suggest the need for increased funding for LTC to support activities and initiatives that promote the well-being of health providers and OA living in LTC, the need to prioritize social well-being during outbreak contexts, and more formalized approaches to guide the appropriate use of technology within LTC.

Workforce resilience supporting staff in managing stress: A coherent breathing intervention for the long-term care workforce.

Staff in long-term care (LTC) homes have long-standing stressors, such as short staffing and high workloads. These stressors increased during the COVID-19 pandemic; better resources are needed to help staff manage stress and well-being. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a simple stress management strategy (coherent breathing). We conducted a pre-post intervention study to evaluate a self-managed coherent breathing intervention from February to September 2022. The intervention included basic (breathing only) and comprehensive (breathing plus a biofeedback device) groups. Six hundred eighty-six participants were initially recruited (359 and 327 in the comprehensive and basic groups respectively) from 31 LTC homes in Alberta, Canada. Two hundred fifty-four participants completed pre-and post-intervention questionnaires (142 [55.9%] in comprehensive and 112 [44.1%] in basic). Participants were asked to use coherent breathing based on a schedule increasing from 2 to 10 min daily, 5-7 times a week over 8 weeks. Participants completed self-administered online questionnaires pre- and post-intervention to assess outcomes-stress, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, resilience, insomnia, compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue, and burnout. We used a mixed-effects regression model to test the main effect of time (pre- and post-intervention) and group while testing the interaction between time and group and controlling for covariates. We found statistically significant changes from pre- to post-intervention in stress (b = -2.5, p < 0.001, 95% CI = -3.1, -1.9), anxiety (b = -0.5, p < 0.001, 95% CI = -0.7, -0.3), depression (b = -0.4, p < 0.001, 95% CI = -0.6, -0.2), insomnia (b = -1.5, p < 0.001, 95% CI = -2.1, -0.9), and resilience (b = 0.2, p < 0.001, 95% CI = 0.1, 0.2). We observed no statistically significant differences between the two intervention groups on any outcome. Our findings suggest that coherent breathing is a promising strategy for improving stress-related outcomes and resilience. This intervention warrants further, more rigorous testing.

Identification of multimorbidity patterns in older adults receiving long-term care in Canada, Italy, Finland and New Zealand: results from the ICARE4OLD project

Background: Older adults receiving home care (HC) services and living in long-term care homes (LTC) experience high levels of multimorbidity. In this project - called iCARE4OLD, we aimed first to identify and compare subgroups of care dependent individuals sharing the same patterns of chronic diseases. For these subgroups, we will identify care paths and try to make integration of services and continuity of care possible. &#x0D; Settings and participants: We studied 102,000 individuals 60+ years receiving HC services or living in LTC homes in Canada, Italy, Finland and New Zealand.&#x0D; Methods: This is a cross-sectional study including the baseline interRAI HC and LTCF assessments of older people in the period of 2014 until 2018. The project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement number 965341 and from the New Frontiers Research Fund, grant number NFRFG-2020-00500.&#x0D; Latent Class Analysis (LCA) was used to classify individuals according to their underlying diseases patterns starting from a list of 19 conditions. &#x0D; Results: Mean age of the sample was 80 years (65% females). After assessing several fit parameters, a 5-class solution was chosen as the best model for both HC and LTC. The following 5 disease patterns were identified in all countries: (1) Alzheimer/dementia; (2) psychiatric diseases; (3) cardio-pulmonary diseases; (4) stroke/hemiplegia; (5) other dementias. The distribution of sociodemographic, clinical and functional characteristics varied across the different multimorbidity patterns, with the cardio-pulmonary disease and the stroke/hemiplegia patterns showing the highest complexity and impairment.&#x0D; Results: Our results show that, by using a common assessment tool, it is possible to identify homogeneous morbidity patterns in older patients receiving long-term care. These may be useful to compare health status in care-dependent individuals across different settings and countries, as well as to predict health trajectories and care needs. &#x0D; Discussion: By applying this methodology to whole populations, care paths can be drawn for home care and residential care clients in a more evidence-based way. The goals would be to use these algorithms to design more integrated care plans for older persons, so that clients and their families are better served, and policy makers can finance the right services and offer targeted care.&#x0D;

Integrating health and social care in the community to support a new model of Long-term Life Care at home.

Background: Long-term care (LTC) reform was an international priority well before the COVID-19 pandemic. While strategies to promote de-institutionalization, rehabilitation, caregiver support and enhanced home and community care have varied by country in terms of implementation and success, the pandemic universally reinforced existing system-specific barriers and weaknesses. In Canada, heightened access issues and silo-ed delivery of community-based medical, functional and social care and support services contributed to increased caregiver burnout and growing residential care waitlists.&#x0D; Aims: This study aimed to develop an alternative model to residential LTC that would enable older adults to live, age and receive care at home long-term. The specific objectives were to: 1) describe variation in medical, functional and psychosocial ‘life care’ needs of community-dwelling older adults; 2) develop a model of needs-based care with packages to support variation in needs; and 3) to assess preliminary feasibility of the model using the Ontario, Canada (population 15 million) health care market. &#x0D; Approach: An exploratory, sequential, mixed methods design was applied (5). Phase 1 involved historical analysis of 2017-18 Ontario interRAI home care assessments (n=283,601) and 2018-19 Ontario service utilization data (n=115,000) to develop unique patient vignettes. Phase 2 was a 6-week modified eDelphi process with interdisciplinary home care clinicians (n=42) to develop care packages for the model, including types and dose of care and services. Six focus groups (n=67) were then conducted with older adults, caregivers and health and social care providers across Ontario to validate and refine the model. Phase 3 explored feasibility of the emerging model through comparison of the home care patient vignettes with the needs of the residential LTC population using 2017-18 Ontario interRAI data (n=115,000). Preliminary costing of the model was based on existing system per diems and direct care costs in comparable transitional care models.&#x0D; Results: A model of ‘Long-term Life Care’ at home (LTLifeC model) includes care packages to meet the dominant life care needs of 6 unique patient groups representing known predictors of LTC home admission: social frailty, caregiver distress, chronic disease, cognition/ behaviours, medical complexity, and geriatric syndromes. Overlap in care needs of home care and LTC populations confirms potential to shift care to the community; yet current home care clients receive six times less daily care hours on average, compared to residential LTC standards. New LTLifeC packages of home-based interdisciplinary care ranged from 3.1-8.9 hours daily, including comprehensive assessment, integrated care planning, direct care provision and community referral(s). Initial cost comparisons suggest plausible short and long-term system benefits of model adoption.&#x0D; Learnings: Evidence-informed decision making for sustainable home and community care as part of an integrated system of LTC requires attention to both routinely collected health information, or ‘big data’, and expertise by lived-experience. Adoption of the LTLifeC model will require decision-making to prioritize societal values for living and aging at home and in community. &#x0D; Next Steps: An evaluation framework will be developed to guide pilot implementation and testing of the LTLifeC model through the lens of the quadruple aim.

Integration of a dental hygienist into the interprofessional long-term care team.

To address poor oral health of residents in long-term care homes (LTCH), this study explored the process of integrating an educational resource and a dental hygienist on the interprofessional care team. This convergent mixed-methods study took place at a 472-bed LTCH in Toronto, Canada from February to August 2018. Nurses employed at the LTCH participated in the study. During the study period, a dental hygienist was integrated into an interprofessional LTCH team. Nurses completed an online eLearning module about using the Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT) when referring residents' oral health concerns to a. Pre/post knowledge quizzes, module feedback and satisfaction surveys were administered. A retrospective chart review examined OHAT use and compared nurse and dental hygienist oral health assessments. Two cycles of semi-structured interviews with five nurses explored experiences with the eLearning module, OHAT and integration of the dental hygienist into the team. Nurses scored well on the knowledge quizzes and reported comfort in using the OHAT to refer oral concerns to a dental hygienist; however, actual use was minimal. oral health issues were under-reported by nurses on the Resident Assessment Instrument-Minimum Data Set (RAI-MDS); the dental hygienist reported significantly more debris, teeth lost and carious teeth (all P < 0.0001). Qualitative analysis indicated that the nurses valued dental hygienist integration into the team. Using knowledge mobilisation practices, a new oral health referral tool was developed. This study highlights the feasibility and desirability of an oral health eLearning module, practical assessment tools and participation of a dental hygienist on the LTCH interprofessional care team.

Patient and public involvement in international research: Perspectives of a team of researchers from six countries on collaborating with people with lived experiences of dementia and end-of-life.

Patient and public involvement (PPI) is a critical priority in research, policy, academia and advocacy organizations. PPI in dementia research is gaining momentum. However, these efforts are missing in international projects aimed at those living with advanced dementia in long-term care (LTC) homes. Additional complexities can arise in enacting PPI within the context of integration of a palliative approach to care and experiences around end-of-life in (EOL) dementia. The mySupport study involved implementing the Family Carer Decision Support (FCDS) intervention for care partners of those living with advanced dementia in LTC in six countries. An interpretive description study was conducted to explore the perspectives of international researchers from six countries on engaging people with lived experiences of dementia and EOL care in research processes. The findings from this study informed the development of a PPI strategy and a subsequent toolkit for the FCDS intervention. Thirty-eight interviews were completed with project researchers: 12 from the United Kingdom, 8 from Canada, 7 from Ireland, 4 each from Italy and The Netherlands and 3 from the Czech Republic. Four broad themes describe international researchers' perspectives on advancing methods of engagement for people with lived experiences of dementia and EOL in international PPI activities: (1) Groundwork to engage in research; (2) planning for research activities is key; (3) focus on meaningful engagement and (4) having foresight for practical issues shaping PPI. International projects that involve PPI can present many sources of challenges. The findings in this study highlight important considerations for foundational work for incorporating PPI in international projects. Learning from world leaders and those with lived experiences in various regions can be insightful and help share tools and resources. PPI was envisioned as a critical part of conducting the mySupport study. The findings from this study informed the development of a PPI strategy and an international Strategic Guiding Council that included family carers of those living with advanced dementia in LTC homes in six countries. This manuscript focused on the perspectives of researchers on their engagement with people with lived experiences of dementia and EOL. The perspectives of persons with lived experiences on engaging in the mySupport research study will be reported in a forthcoming manuscript.

A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF MEASURES OF SOCIAL CONNECTION FOR PEOPLE LIVING IN LONG-TERM CARE HOMES: THE SONNET STUDY

Abstract Social connection is important for quality of life and care in long-term care (LTC) homes. However, measuring social connection in LTC residents is challenging and research is limited by a lack of consensus on best approaches to measurement. Our study objective is to systematically review measures of social connection developed for LTC residents. We are following COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) systematic review methods. We searched multiple bibliographic databases to April 2022 for studies conducted in LTC residents that quantified any aspect(s) of social connection and reported at least one psychometric property for the measure(s) of social connection. We are using COSMIN guidelines to evaluate the properties reported for each measure. We identified 60 studies reporting on 38 measures that assess social connection in LTC homes. Twenty-eight were measures of quality of life, wellbeing or life satisfaction and included a social connection subdomain. Only 10 measures specifically targeted social connection. From our evaluation of 32 measures to date, we found that 16% (n=5) have sufficient structural validity, 9% (n=3) have sufficient internal consistency, 22% (n=7) have sufficient reliability, and 19% (n=6) have sufficient construct validity. Many measures have assessed social connection in LTC homes, but few are designed for this purpose and many have insufficient psychometric properties. This review will provide detailed evidence of the quality of these measures to enable researchers to prioritise valid and reliable tools. Our results will inform our development of a new person-centred measure of social connection for LTC residents.

ENGAGEMENT OF FAMILY/CARE PARTNERS OF OLDER ADULT LONG-TERM CARE RESIDENTS WITH PHYSIOTHERAPISTS: A SCOPING REVIEW

Abstract The aim of this scoping review was to summarize and critically evaluate literature describing the relationship between physical therapists and family/care partners of older adults living in long-term care homes. A librarian-informed search strategy was applied to Medline, EMBASE, Proquest, PsychINFO, SCOPUS and CINAHL databases. Papers were included if they addressed rehabilitation, physical therapists, family/care partners, and long-term care (LTC) setting or equivalent. Five papers were retrieved; quality was mid-to high. Challenges included minimal integration of family/care partners into the long-term care home ’team’, inconsistent resident-centred health goals across staff, and lack of awareness about availability of physical therapy services within long-term care homes. Value for family/care partners as members of the health care team included their historical knowledge of their loved one, ability to perceive and manage behaviour change, signs/symptoms of pain by their loved ones with impaired communication (e.g., dementia diagnosis), and the resource of time and availability to engage in rehabilitation-related care activity. There is little information about partnership with family/care partners of older adults living in long-term care homes. The timing is optimal to explore the engagement of family/care partners in providing care and building rehabilitation capacity within the context of increasing nursing workloads, nurses’ experience of burnout, difficulty in attraction and retention of care staff in long-term care homes, and challenges in funding for and standards in provision of optimal rehabilitation for older adult residents of long-term care homes.

LOVOT ROBOT AS COMPANIONS FOR OLDER ADULTS IN LONG-TERM CARE

Abstract This exploratory, mixed-methods study explores how older adults living in Canadian Long-Term Care (LTC) homes experience and perceive LOVOT, an AI-driven social robot from Japan. It is an extended arm of a mixed-methods, three-country study conducted in Singapore, Hong Kong, and Canada. Our Canadian sample consists of 20 older adults and 40 interdisciplinary staff, and 10 leadership team members. The participants join four weekly sessions of interaction with LOVOT. In the quantitative portion of the study, questionnaires are administered before and after interaction with LOVOT to assess participants’ experiences of the LOVOT robot. The qualitative portion consists of individual conversational interviews with older adults and focus groups with the LTC staff and leadership. We use thematic analysis to guide our initial conceptual framework, and later use both Chi-square tests and content analysis for our quantitative and qualitative data. This study demonstrates (1) the experiences and perceptions of older adults and their family members regarding their interactions with the LOVOT robot, and (2) the LTC staff and leadership perceptions on having the LOVOT robot in LTC. The study offers insights into the potential role of social robots in LTC homes across eastern and western countries.

RESIDENT EXPERIENCES OF PERSON-CENTRED CARE AT MEALTIMES IN LONG-TERM RESIDENTIAL CARE: A RAPID ETHNOGRAPHY

Abstract Poor nutrition is a common ongoing problem in long-term residential care, often resulting in reduced quality of life. Previous research has concluded that the content of the meal, dining environment, service style and general atmosphere all add to the mealtime experience, suggesting that person-centred mealtimes are optimal. However, knowledge about which elements of person-centred care can be achieved in a mealtime setting in a given context is currently lacking. As part of the TRANS-SENIOR research network, rapid ethnographies were conducted across multiple sites (including interviews, observations and informal conversations), in long-term residential care homes in the UK, Switzerland and the Netherlands between October 2020 and December 2021. During analysis and interpretation of data, different themes were developed where either successfully achieved or missed opportunities for person-centred moments were observed. We observed differences between the long-term care homes in as much as the setting could be considered, resident choice was implemented, residents were enabled, care was individualized in the communal setting and how much the person of the residents was known with their past and present. In the presentation we will discuss the possibility to provide person-centred care during mealtimes in view of differences between staff approaches, the overall environment (size of dining area, seating arrangements etc.), allocation of staff resources and country-specific rules and regulations. We see an interplay of factors in place for mealtimes to be moments of participatory choice, interaction, independence, and dignity.

The perceptions of university students on technological and ethical risks of using robots in long-term care homes.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately impacted long-term care (LTC) residents and exacerbated residents' risks of social isolation and loneliness. The unmet emotional needs of residents in LTC have driven researchers and decision-makers to consider novel technologies to improve care and quality of life for residents. Ageist stereotypes have contributed to the underuse of technologies by the older population. Telepresence robots have been found to be easy to use and do not require older adults to learn how to operate the robot but are remotely controlled by family members. The study aimed to understand the perspectives of multidisciplinary university students, including healthcare students, on using telepresence robots in LTC homes. The study would contribute to the future planning, implementation, and design of robotics in LTC. Methods: Between December 2021 and March 2022, our team conducted interviews with 15 multidisciplinary students. We employed a qualitative descriptive (QD) approach with semi-structured interview methods. Our study aimed to understand the perspectives of university students (under the age of 40) on using telepresence robots in LTC homes. Participants were invited to spend 15 min remotely driving a telepresence robot prior to the interview. A diverse team of young researchers and older adults (patient and family partners) conducted reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Six themes were identified: Robots as supplementary interaction; privacy, confidentiality, and physical harm; increased mental well-being and opportunities for interactions; intergenerational perspectives add values; staffing capacity; environmental and cultural factors influence acceptance. Conclusion: We identified a diverse range of perspectives regarding risk and privacy among participants regarding the implementation of telepresence robots in long-term care. Participants shared the importance of the voice of the resident and their own for creating more equitable decision-making and advocating for including this type of technology within LTC. Our study would contribute to the future planning, implementation, and design of robotics in LTC.