Long-term Care Users Research Articles

Using Unsupervised Learning Methods to Explore the Trajectory of Long-Term Care Service in Taiwan

Abstract Background Understanding the temporal trends in long-term care (LTC) utilization enables more effective planning by government and service providers. This study employed machine learning methods to explore LTC utilization trajectories among care recipients in a southern county of Taiwan. Methods Administrative data from the government-funded LTC programme was utilized, with a total of 24,614 participants included after excluding those with less than six months of data. Daily service utilization records, mainly focusing on caregiving services, were aggregated, and the number of days each participant used LTC services within every 30-day period post-application was calculated. Utilization rates during 6 and 12 months post-application were separately analyzed. K-means clustering, an unsupervised machine learning method, was employed to select the optimal classification and identify LTC utilization trajectories using 10-fold cross validation. Temporal frequency variations of each caregiving service within each trajectory group were visualized using heatmaps. Results In the analysis of LTC utilization within the first 6 months post-application, trajectories were classified into 7 groups; while within 12 months, trajectories were divided into 4 groups. These trajectories can be categorized into 4 distinct patterns: High-Stable (6 mo: 21.3%; 12 mo: 35.7%), Low-Stable (6 mo: 33.1%; 12 mo: 37.2%), High-Decrease (6 mo: 12.8%; 12 mo: 10.7%), and Low-Increase (6 mo: 32.7%; 12 mo: 16.5%). We further explored differences in socio-demographic characteristics and needs factors among trajectory groups. Heatmaps were used to illustrate temporal variations in the utilization rates of specific service items, which played a significant role in determining the trajectories. Conclusions K-means clustering is useful in identifying distinct patterns among LTC users. Tailored service delivery strategies can be designed to meet the diverse needs of these different user groups. Key messages • The unsupervised machine learning method distinguished various temporal dynamic patterns in LTC utilization. • Tailored service delivery strategies can be designed to meet the diverse needs of these different user groups.

Differences in healthcare use and mortality in older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: Exploring long-term care users' vulnerability

BackgroundThe objective of our study is to analyze the health care received by older adults with COVID-19 according to their place of residence (whether or not they live in a long-term care [LTC] facility) and to find out the effect of health care on mortality. MethodsRetrospective cohort study based in Aragón (Spain) from March 2020 to March 2021 in patients aged 65 years or older with a confirmed COVID-19 infection. The population was classified according to their place of residence (living in a LTC or not). A propensity score was used to match individuals by sex and age. The effect of living in a LTC facility on healthcare delivery and mortality was conducted using adjusted multivariate models. Varimp was used to estimate the best predictors of mortality for both groups. ResultsHealthcare services utilization varied depending on whether the patients lived in a LTC facility or not. The time to diagnosis was shorter in institutionalized patients, but the time to hospital admission was longer. Length of hospital stays, risk of ICU admission and 30-day mortality were also different and remained statistically significant in the adjusted models. The variables that were more important in the association between healthcare utilization and mortality were those associated with greater severity of COVID-19. ConclusionsThere were differences in health care for older adults diagnosed with COVID-19 according to their place of residence. There is a need to strengthen collaboration between professionals in LTC centers and health services to provide equitable health care.

Active involvement in scientific research of persons living with dementia and long-term care users: a systematic review of existing methods with a specific focus on good practices, facilitators and barriers of involvement

BackgroundActive involvement of persons living with dementia (PLWD) and long-term care (LTC) users in research is essential but less developed compared to other patient groups. However, their involvement in research is not only important but also feasible. This study aims to provide an overview of methods, facilitators, and barriers for involving PLWD and LTC users in scientific research.MethodsA systematic literature search across 12 databases in December 2020 identified studies involving PLWD, LTC users, or their carers beyond research subjects and describing methods or models for involvement. Qualitative descriptions of involvement methods underwent a risk of bias assessment using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Qualitative Checklist 2018. A data collection sheet in Microsoft Excel and thematic analysis were used to synthesize the results.ResultsThe eighteen included studies delineated five core involvement methods spanning all research phases: advisory groups, formal and informal research team meetings, action groups, workshops, and co-conducting interviews. Additionally, two co-research models with PLWD and carers were found, while only two studies detailed LTC user involvement methods. Four distinct involvement roles were identified: consulting and advisory roles, co-analysts, co-researchers, and partners. The review also addressed barriers, facilitators, and good practices in the preparation, execution, and translation phases of research, emphasizing the importance of diversity, bias reduction, and resource allocation. Trust-building, clear roles, ongoing training, and inclusive support were highlighted.ConclusionsPlanning enough time for active involvement is important to ensure that researchers have time to build a trusting relationship and meet personal needs and preferences of PLWD, LTC users and carers. Researchers are advised not to presume the meaning of burden and to avoid a deficit perspective. A flexible or emergent design could aid involved persons’ ownership of the research process.Trial registrationProspero 2021: CRD42021253736.

Mini-ACE: Validation Study Among Older People in Long-Term Care.

The Mini-Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination (M-ACE) is a valid and reliable tool that accurately differentiates various types of cognitive impairment from Normal-cognition assessed in multiple settings. However, its validity among older individuals in long-term care (LTC) was not yet established. Therefore, we sought to assess the Portuguese M-ACE's validity, reliability, and accuracy in detecting cognitive impairment no-dementia (CIND) in LTC users. A comprehensive assessment was performed on 196 LTC Portuguese users aged ≥ 60 years, among whom 71 had Normal-cognition, and 125 had CIND. The M-ACE was found to be reliable (McDonald's ω = .86, Cronbach's α = .85) and consistent over time (r = .72; ICC = .83) and between raters (k = .92). Strong correlations with related measures supported construct validity (both r = .67). The M-ACE accurately distinguished CIND from Normal-cognition with a cut-off of 17 points (AUC = 0.81, Sensitivity = 81.7%, Specificity = 74.4%). Our findings suggest that the Portuguese M-ACE is a valid and reliable cognitive assessment tool for LTC users, allowing for accurate differentiation between CIND and Normal-cognition. Thus, the M-ACE's use could contribute to the early detection and intervention of cognitive disorders, especially among older adults in LTC.

Quality of life of elderly users of long-term health care in and outside the institution

<p><strong>Introduction. </strong>Long-term care is series of health and social care services provided at home or in an institutional environment to people with reduced functional capacity. Even though it is known that the quality of life (QoL) of elderly is on a lower level when compared to younger people, there is a small amount of information about QoL of long-term health care patients. The aim of our study was to determine the difference in QoL, depression, anxiety and stress of longterm health care users placed in and outside the institution.</p> <p><strong>Methods.</strong> This cross-sectional study included 100 long-term healthcare users, divided in two groups. First group consisted of 50 respondents from primary level of health care and second group consisted of 50 residents of nursing home. The research was conducted in the period from June to July 2022. A general socio-demographic questionnaire, SF-36 health questionnaire for estimating the QoL and the scale of depression, anxiety and stress (DASS-21) were used as instruments in this study.</p> <p><strong>Results. </strong>Respondents who were institutionalized had significantly lower values of domains and summary scores of QoL compared to respondents whose health care took place outside of institutions, where the difference was observed in physical health summary score (37.67±6.20% vs. 50.39±10.74%, p<0.001), and the mental health summary score (44.87±11.82% vs. 51.83±16.01%, p =0.015). Respondents who received long-term health care institutionally had significantly (p=0.011) more mild anxiety (12%) and moderate anxiety (34%) compared to respondents who received long-term health care outside the institution (4% vs. 14%).</p> <p><strong>Conclusion. </strong>Our results showed that residents of nursing home had significantly worse physical and mental functioning, as well as more frequent occurrence of anxiety symptoms compared to users of longterm health care placed outside institutions, in home environment.</p>

Early onset of care needs in the older population: The protective role of housing conditions.

Most older people wish to live in their own homes as they age and to have a choice over their housing and care situation. Housing has the potential to play a key role in promoting independence, delaying and/or preventing the onset of care needs and in influencing the level and type of care provision required. However, many older people live in homes that are not suitable for their comfort and needs. Our study focuses on older people living in non-specialist housing in England and aims to i) explore how housing characteristics cluster; and ii) investigate their association with an early onset of care needs. We used four waves of a large representative longitudinal sample of people aged 50 or over, covering the period 2012 to 2020. We performed Latent Class Analysis and a Cox regression survival model to provide answers to our research questions. We found that people living in poor housing conditions or living in social rented housing are more likely to experience early onset of care needs, which may lead to a higher demand for, and utilisation of, long-term care services. We believe that gaining a better understanding of the relationship between housing-related conditions and care needs is paramount from the preventative and service provision point of view, and is of relevance to policymakers, practitioners, and current and future adult long-term care users.

주야간보호 서비스 만족도 영향요인 연구: 인력, 비용, 시설환경 요인을 중심으로

The purpose of this study is to analyze the factors influencing the day and night care service satisfaction of the caregiver. Among staffing factors, benefit cost factors, and facility environment factors, which factor best explains service satisfaction is to be identified. The subject of this study is the primary caregiver of long-term care insurance day and night care users for the elderly. Some of the data collected through the 2021 study of the National Health Insurance Service’s ‘The Function Specialization of the Day and Night Care in the Long-Term Care Insurance’ was used. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis method was performed. The analysis results of this study are as follows. Among staffing factors, benefit cost factors, and facility environment factors, the factor that best explains the service satisfaction of the primary caregiver is staffing factor, followed by facility environment factors and benefit cost factors in that order. In particular, in the staffing factor, the professionalism of the staff, communication with the family, and the degree of reflection of the family were analyzed as determinants that affect service satisfaction. As for the benefit cost factors, it was found that the higher the satisfaction with the cost of using the service, the higher the satisfaction with the service. In terms of facility environment factors, the latest facilities and sufficient equipment, a structure that is convenient for the elderly to use, and a caring space affected service satisfaction. Based on the research results, related policy and practical directions were suggested, such as strengthening staffing and facility environment standards, appropriateness of benefit costs, and seeking various service payment methods that can enhance the satisfaction of services provided by day and night care institutions.

Association between use of different long-term care services and risks of mental disorder and mortality as well as medical utilization.

This study sought to investigate mental disorder and mortality risks and medical utilization among various long-term care (LTC) services and examine the associated factors. This retrospective cohort study used data from the National Health Insurance Research Database of the entire population of Taiwan recorded between 2006 and 2017. A total of 41,407 patients using LTC (study group) were identified and propensity score-matched with 41,407 LTC nonusers (control group) at a ratio of 1:1 according to sex, age, salary-based premium, comorbidity index score, and urbanization level. Patients were divided into four groups according to LTC service type. The age distribution was as follows: 50-60 years (10.47%), 61-70 years (14.48%), 71-80 years (35.59%), and 81 years and older (39.45%). The mean age was 70.18 years and 53.57% of female participants were included. The major statistical methods were the Cox proportional hazards model and the general linear model (GLM). Users of both institutional and inhome LTC services had the highest risk of mental disorder [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 3.2]. The mean mortality rate in LTC nonusers was 46.2%, whereas that in LTC users was 90.4%, with the highest found among the users of both institutional and inhome LTC (90.6%). The institutional LTC users had the shortest survival time (4.1 years). According to the adjusted Cox model analysis, the odds of mortality was significantly higher among institutional LTC users than among inhome LTC users (aHR = 1.02). After the adjustment of covariates, adjusted GLM model results revealed that the annual medical expenditure per capita of LTC nonusers was NT$46,551, which was 1.6 times higher that of LTC users. Users of both institutional and inhome LTC services have higher risk of mental disorder, shorter survival time, and lower medical utilization.

Kvalitet života korisnika dugoročne zdravstvene njege

Objective. Long-term care represents a series of health and social care services that are provided at home or in an institutional environment to people with reduced functional capacity (reduced physical and/or cognitive abilities) who need support in performing daily activities, and who depend on the help of others for a long time period. The goal of the research was to examine the quality of life of users with long-term health care, with a special focus on comparing the quality of life between people placed institutionally and outside of the institution. Methods. The research was designed according to the principle of a cross-sectional study. In the research, a general questionnaire and a scale for assessing the quality of life Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) were used. Among the statistical tests, the ch2 square test was used. The usual value of p<0.05 was taken as the level of statistical significance. Results. Subjects who were institutionalized had statistically significantly lower values of domains and summary scores of quality of life compared to subjects whose health care took place outside of institutions, whereby the difference was observed in physical functioning (p<0.001), social functioning (p=0.003) and mental health summary score (p=0.015). Conclusion. Users of long-term health care placed in an institution had significantly worse physical functioning, a higher level of limitations due to physical problems, worse general health, a lower level of social functioning, as well as mental health.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN UNMET NEEDS APPRAISAL SCALE FOR LONG-TERM CARE SERVICE USERS

Abstract Background Taiwan’s Long-Term Care (LTC) Plans 1.0 and 2.0 aimed to provide accessible LTC services since 2007. Currently, >40% of the people needing LTC are covered by these plans. Past studies have indicated that high unmet needs among LTC users may lead to adverse outcomes. Thus, whether the LTC services meet the needs of both the care recipients and their family caregivers merits further study. The purpose of this study was to develop a suitable “unmet needs appraisal scale (UNAS) for long-term care service users” and pilot test this tool on older Taiwanese adults. Methods The tool was developed through a systematic literature review. The tool underwent two rounds of the Delphi method with 26 experts, and the tool reached a high consensus among the experts. The UNAS includes 11 items assessing activities that need more assistance, including daily activities, psychological health, and spiritual health. We pilot tested the tool in older Taiwanese adults and examined the tool properties, including reliability and validity. We included short-form 8 as a concurrent validity measure. Result: The survey was conducted in 6 counties, and 255 service user questionnaires were collected. The overall Cronbach's α value was 0.91, indicating good internal consistency. Our confirmatory factor analysis also showed good construct validity [χ2 = 146.514, p < 0.001, CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.02]. The UNAS scores showed a moderate negative correlation with quality of life scores (r = –0.452, p < 0.001), demonstrating good concurrent validity of the unmet needs scale.

Personal assistants in England and the factors associated with absenteeism.

Personal assistants (PAs) have become an increasingly important element of long-term care (LTC) in England since the introduction of Direct Payments in 1996 and the Care Act 2014 legislation. The PAs, who are directly employed by social care users, can perform a number of support tasks including vital assistance in activities of daily living (ADL). Internationally these roles would be classed as domestic care work, including the employment of migrant care workers, e.g. in Germany and Austria. High turnover rates and work absenteeism in this market can cause disruption of these important daily activities, causing LTC users to potentially suffer neglect and poorer quality of life. Although there is research on turnover and absenteeism in nursing workforce in hospitals and LTC workers in nursing homes, little attention has been given to reasons for turnover of PAs and even less for absenteeism, which often precedes turnover, in a workforce of over 100,000 people in England. This research aims to fill this gap in knowledge by analyzing the reasons behind the absenteeism of PAs using quantitative methods. We used survey data of PAs in England, exploring the factors associated to one form of absenteeism—sick leave from work. After controlling for a number of factors ranging from job characteristics such as number of hours worked and type of contract, socio-economic characteristics from the PA and their employer, and supply and demand factors at local government region, the findings suggest a number of factors that significantly influenced sick leave, including distances traveled to work and number of PAs employed. Following the analysis, two people with life experience of LTC discuss the findings of the study and how they compare to their experiences of the market for PAs, providing a unique perspective from the people who could benefit the most from improving PA retention and reducing absenteeism.

Projecting Informal Care Demand among Older Koreans between 2020 and 2067.

Background: The number of Korean older people receiving informal care is expected to rise sharply due to aging population. This study makes projections of demand for informal care in community-dwelling older people aged 65 and over in Korea until 2067. Method: The study drew on data collected from waves 4–6 of the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (2012–2016, n = 12,975). Population data published by Statistics Korea and data from the Long-term Care Insurance Statistical Yearbook for Korea were also used. A macro-simulation model was built to make the projections. Results: The number of older people receiving informal care will increase from 0.71 million in 2020 to 2.2 million in 2067. Demand for informal care from adult children or relatives is projected to rise by 257%, much faster than the increase in demand for spousal care (164%). The estimates are sensitive to alternative assumptions about future mortality rates, fertility rates, patterns of migration, and the prevalence of functional disabilities in the population. Conclusion: Demand for informal care in Korea will rise substantially in the coming decades, and the increase will be uneven for different groups of care users. Our analyses are not only relevant to the long-term care system for the general older population but also have profound implications for intensive users of long-term care in Korea. The findings highlight the importance of accurate identification of unmet needs in the population and timely delivery of government support to older people and their informal caregivers.

Factors associated with preferred place of death among older adults: a qualitative interview study in Tama City, Tokyo, Japan

ObjectivesTo analyse the cognitive processes involved in the decision-making of older adults who are not in the end-of-life stage regarding the selection of a preferred place of death.DesignA qualitative cross-sectional...

Supporting the involvement of older adults with complex needs in evaluation of outcomes in long-term care at home programmes.

BackgroundIt is important to involve older people in evaluating public programmes that affect their lives. This includes those with physical and cognitive impairments (such as dementia) who may need support to live at home. Many countries have implemented new approaches to support older people to live well at home for longer. However, it can be challenging to involve disabled people in service evaluation, so we are unclear whether services are meeting their needs.AimThis study explored how a cascading methodology, offering different supports enabled the involvement of home care users with cognitive and physical impairments in the assessment of their care‐related quality of life.MethodWe used multiple tools from the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) with n = 63 older adults who were recipients of home care in the Illawarra. We also offered different physical and cognitive supports as needed.ResultsWe started with the standard ASCOT questionnaire to assess the care‐related quality of life, but then offered alternative formats (including Easy Read) and supports (including physical and cognitive assistance) if the older person needed them to participate. This allowed us to involve a greater diversity of older people in the evaluation, and changed what we found out about whether their care needs were being met.ConclusionThere is a need to implement more flexible and inclusive methods to increase the involvement of vulnerable users of long‐term care in the assessment of service outcomes. This is important to ensure that the perspectives of all service users inform the delivery of person‐centred care. It is also critical to understand the extent to which programmes are meeting the needs of vulnerable service users.Patient or Public ContributionService users with dementia were involved in the design of the ‘Easy Read’ questionnaire used in the study.

How does long‐term care impact the psychological wellbeing of older adults in different care policy contexts in the Netherlands?

Receipt of long‐term care (LTC) is generally associated with worse psychological wellbeing for community‐dwelling older adults. In addition to objective features of care use (e.g. formal vs. informal care), the subjective evaluation of care provision in terms of perceived sufficiency might be particularly predictive of one's wellbeing but is seldomly considered in the literature. Substantial changes in the availability of long‐term care in past decades raise the question to what extent these effects, if present, are consistent over historic time. The present study, therefore, aims at better understanding the associations between types of LTC use and perceived care sufficiency on psychological wellbeing in a changing LTC context in the Netherlands. Data from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) were used from three points in time: 1998 (N = 582), 2008 (N = 459) and 2018 (N = 415). At each wave, participants were between 75 and 85 years of age and living independently. The results show that after adjusting for age, gender, education and health, using formal LTC had a negative effect on depressive symptoms only in 2018, but that this effect was not significantly worse compared to previous cohorts. Perceived care sufficiency was consistently negatively associated with depressive symptoms in all three points in time. This suggests that despite a less generous Dutch LTC system, psychological wellbeing among LTC users remains stable. Perceiving care provision as sufficient, however, can help older adults maintain psychological wellbeing and should be considered by researchers and policymakers that aim to improve care recipients’ wellbeing.

Use of Long-Term Care Decreased Over Time Among the Oldest-Old With and Without Dementia - A Register-Based Study

Care policies for older adults emphasize aging-in-place and home care over residential long-term care (LTC). We explore how the use of residential LTC in the last five years of life among people with and without dementia changed between those who died in 2001, 2007, 2013, and 2017 in Finland. Retrospective data drawn from the national health and social care registers include all those who died aged 70+ in 2007, 2013, and 2017, plus a 40% random sample from 2001 (N=128 050). Negative binomial regression analysis was used to estimate the association of dementia with LTC use during the last five years of life (1825 days). The independent variables included dementia, age, marital status, annual income, education, and chronic conditions. In the total study population, the proportion of LTC users and the mean number of days in LTC increased until 2013, after which it decreased. Changes in LTC use differed between different age groups and by dementia status. Over time, the decrease in round-the-clock LTC use was steep in those aged 90≤ with dementia and in people aged 80≤ without dementia. The individual factors related to morbidity and sociodemographic factors did not explain these results. The changes in LTC care policy may have contributed to the decrease in LTC use among the oldest. However, according to national statistics, the availability of formal home care has not increased. This development may suggest that the oldest-old and those with dementia – a highly vulnerable group – are left without proper care.

Gender-linked determinants for utilization of long-term care in community-dwelling adults in Germany

Abstract Background The number of people using long-term care (LTC) is increasing steadily worldwide. Hence, demand for adequate services is rising. The purpose of this exploratory study was to identify relevant gender-linked determinants for utilization of LTC in community-dwelling older adults. Methods We examined 4077 females (52.7%) and males ≥ 65 years old (range: 65-97) between 2011/12 (t1) and 2016 (t2). Data originated from the population-based Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg (KORA)-Age study in Germany. A descriptive analysis assessed the amount of LTC used. Cross-sectional generalized estimating equation logistic models identified determinants for utilization of (in)formal LTC. Determinants for transition to LTC between t1 and t2 were examined using a longitudinal logistic regression model. Potential determinants were chosen according to Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. Results At t2, 820 (20.1%) were LTC users with 527 (64.3%) being female. The average amount of informal LTC was higher in males (158.0 minutes/day (m/d) (SD: 270.5) vs. 70.1 m/d (SD: 152.8)), whereas the amount of formal LTC was higher in females (89.7 m/d (SD: 224.7) vs. 28.5 m/d (SD: 23.3)). In both genders, higher age, multimorbidity, and disability were associated with utilization of and transition to LTC. Living alone was significantly associated with utilization of (formal) LTC in both genders, but its effect was almost two times stronger in males (men: OR: 3.48 (CI: 2.05-5.90) vs females: OR: 1.83 (CI: 1.25-2.69)). Thus, ‘living alone' is considered the essential gender-linked determinant. Conclusions Gender-linked determinants must be considered when establishing demand-oriented policies. Future health programs should specifically target older individuals, especially males, living alone to improve their capabilities in activities of daily living to allow them to remain living longer and more independently within community settings. Key messages Older individuals, especially men, living alone should be targeted in future health programs. Females tend to use a higher amount of formal long-term care than males.

Gender-linked determinants for utilization of long-term care in community-dwelling adults 65+ in Germany: Results from the population-based KORA-Age study

The number of people using long-term care (LTC) is increasing steadily, hence, demand for adequate services is rising. The purpose of this exploratory study was to identify relevant gender-linked determinants for utilization of LTC in community-dwelling older adults. We examined 4077 females (52.7%) and males ≥ 65years old (range: 65-97 years) between 2011/12 (t1) and 2016 (t2). Data originated from the population-based Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg (KORA)-Age study in southern Germany. A descriptive analysis assessed the amount of LTC used. Cross-sectional generalized estimating equation logistic models identified determinants for utilization of (in)formal LTC. Determinants for transition to LTC between t1 and t2 were examined using a longitudinal logistic regression model. Potential determinants were chosen according to Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. At t2, 820 (20.1%) were LTC users with 527 (64.3%) being female. The average amount of informal LTC was higher in males, whereas the amount of formal LTC was higher in females. In both genders, higher age, multimorbidity, and disability were associated with utilization of and transition to LTC. Living alone was significantly associated with utilization of LTC in both genders, but its effect was two times stronger in males. Thus, it is considered the essential gender-linked determinant. Gender-linked determinants must be considered when establishing demand-oriented policies. Future health programs should specifically target older individuals, especially males, living alone to improve their capabilities in activities of daily living to allow them to remain living longer and independently within community settings.

Reablement in a small municipality, a survival analysis

BackgroundReablement is a municipal service given to patients at home. The purpose of the service is to assist recovery after hospital discharges or other sudden changes in a patient’s functional level. The service is often provided by a team of nurses, physiotherapists, and occupational therapists. The purpose of this paper is to compare users of this service to users who receive traditional home care services. Outcomes to be measured are risk of long-term care and mortality.MethodsAll users of health and care services in a Norwegian municipality were eligible for inclusion. Data was extracted from the local user administrative database. Users were divided in two groups: those who received reablement and those home care users who did not receive reablement service. Propensity score matching was used to match users based on age, sex, and level of functioning in activities of daily living (ADL). Survival analysis was deployed to test if the reablement users had different risk of becoming long-term care users, and whether the mortality rate differed for this group.Results153 reablement users were included in the study. These were matched to 153 non-reablement home care users. The groups had similar distributions of age, sex, and level of functioning when starting their service trajectories. Regressions showed that reablement users had lower risk of using long-term care services in the study period (time at risk up to 4 years), and lower mortality. However, none of these estimates were statistically significant.ConclusionsThe study indicates that the reablement users in one municipality had lower use of long -term care and lower mortality when properly estimated, but numbers were too small for statistical significance to be found.

Disciplined into good conduct: Gender constructions of users in a municipal psychiatric context in Sweden.

To examine how gendered discursive norms and notions of masculinity and femininity were (re)produced in professional conversations about users of long-term municipality psychiatric care. Focus is on the staff's use of language in relation to gender constructions. Psychiatric care in Sweden has undergone tremendous changes in recent decades from custodian care in large hospitals to a care mainly located in a municipal context. People who need psychiatric care services often live in supporting houses. In municipal psychiatric care, staff conduct weekly professional meetings to discuss daily matters and the users' needs. Official reports of the Swedish government have shown that staff in municipal care services treat disabled women and men differently. Studies exploring gender in relation to users of long-term psychiatric care in municipalities have problematised the care and how staff, through language, construct users' gender. Therefore, language used by staff is a central tool for ascribing different gender identities of users. The content of speech derived from audio recordings was analysed using Foucauldian discourse analysis. The COREQ checklist was used in this article. The results indicate that by relying on gender discourses, staff create a conditional care related to how the users should demonstrate good conduct. In line with that, an overall discourse was created: Disciplined into good conduct. It was underpinned by three discourses inherent therein: The unreliable drinker and the confession, Threatened dignity, and Doing different femininities. The community psychiatric context generates a discourse of conduct in which staff via spoken language (re)produces gendered patterns and power imbalances as a means to manage daily work routines. Such practices of care, in which constant, nearly panoptic, control despite the intention to promote autonomy, urgently require problematising current definitions of good conduct and normality.