Long-term Care Facilities Research Articles

Association between quadriceps muscle thickness or echo intensity, malnutrition, and activities of daily living in an integrated medical and long-term care facility: A cross-sectional study

Background &AimsMalnutrition and physical function impairment are prevalent concerns in long-term care facilities. This study investigated the relationship between quadriceps muscle thickness (QMT) or echo intensity (QEI), nutritional status, and activities of daily living (ADL) in residents of an Integrated Facility for Medical and Long-term Care (IFMLC) in Japan. MethodsUsing a cross-sectional design, 126 residents (86 women, median age 89 years) at an IFMLC were assessed. Malnutrition was diagnosed using the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria including disease burden/inflammation, while ADL status was evaluated using the Barthel Index (BI). QMT and QEI, indicative of muscle mass and intramuscular adipose tissue, were measured by ultrasound. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses were conducted to explore the association of QMT or QEI with malnutrition and ADL. Results62 residents (49%) were in the lower QMT group and 63 residents (50%) were in the upper QEI group. The prevalence of severe malnutrition in the lower QMT group was significantly higher than that in the upper QMT group. Moreover, the lower QMT group had significantly lower BI points than the upper QMT group. The upper QEI group had significantly lower BI points than the lower QEI group. lower QMT was associated with severe malnutrition (odds ratio 3.170; 95% CI 1.238 to 8.725; P = 0.016). Furthermore, both lower QMT (B = −12.520; 95% CI −17.069 to −7.973; P < 0.001) and upper QEI (B = −7.598; 95% CI −12.565 to −2.631; P = 0.003) showed an independent correlation with lower BI scores. ConclusionThis study found a relationship between lower QMT correlated with severe malnutrition and poor ADL, while higher QEI is associated with poor ADL.

Sustainability of the Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory Use in Ohio Nursing Homes Over Time

ObjectivesIn 2015, the Ohio Department of Medicaid incentivized use of the Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory (PELI) as a quality initiative. The pay-for-performance (P4P) program, however, was then deimplemented in 2019. This study investigated the sustainability of use of the PELI in Ohio nursing homes (NHs) from 2017 to 2021 and examined barriers to PELI implementation. DesignThis study analyzed 2 waves of Ohio Biennial Survey of Long-Term Care Facilities data. Setting and ParticipantsData were drawn from 433 NHs in Ohio that reported on PELI implementation efforts between 2017 and 2021. MethodsThis study examined the change in proportion of NHs implementing the PELI (ie, conducted for all residents, used in care planning) and change in proportion of NHs using different PELI assessment formats (ie, the full 72-item PELI, MDS 3.0 Section F items only). Frequencies of reported barriers to PELI implementation by NH administrators were tabulated. ResultsResults indicate that although use of the full 72-item PELI decreased over time, only a small percentage discontinued its use despite possible impacts of P4P changes in 2019 and challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. NHs adapted their PELI assessment formats likely in response to perceived barriers of PELI use (ie, length of the full PELI, time constraints, and residents’ level of cognitive impairment). Conclusions and ImplicationsFindings suggest that Ohio NHs sustained PELI implementation over time in the context of large systemic changes in P4P financial incentives and COVID-19 safeguards. Barriers were reported at the organizational level, yet NHs continued to prioritize PCC with the PELI. Policy/P4P mandates may serve as effective implementation incentives that encourage sustainability of quality care practices. Future research should explore long-term sustainability and stakeholder perspectives on PELI utilization.

Behavior change techniques to increase physical activity among older adults living in long-term care facilities: A systematic review.

Despite the health benefits of physical activity, many older adults living in long-term care facilities lead sedentary lifestyles and do not meet minimum physical activity recommendations. Determining the behavior change techniques (BCTs) used in physical activity interventions can help us understand the underlying mechanisms by which behavioral change is achieved. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate BCTs in physical activity interventions for the elderly residents. Six electronic databases were searched and 15 eligible studies were retained. Nine promising BCTs associated with physical activity promotion among elderly residents were identified: credible source, social support (unspecified), goal setting (outcome), goal setting (behavior), demonstration of the behavior, instruction on how to perform a behavior, self-monitoring of behavior, self-monitoring of outcome(s) of behavior, and adding objects to the environment. Future research is encouraged to select and tailor these BCTs to the specific needs and preferences of the target population.

Vulnerable Lives, Irrelevant Deaths? Dying Alone and Receiving Flawed Care in an Institution for the Aged in Lima, Peru

ABSTRACT This ethnographic exploration of death in the Peruvian context draws on fieldwork among abandoned–both by their families and the state–older adults in a shelter for the homeless in Lima, Peru. I examine the conditions and local forces that shape the ways people at this institution socially and physically die. My argument is that people in this long-term care facility who have lived entire lives on the margins, usually, end up having irrelevant deaths to their families, other residents of the institution, and the Peruvian state. At this shelter, dying in an irrelevant way means dying without companionship from family members and receiving poor and flawed care from the institution that shelters them.

The extended impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on long-term care residents in Medicare with frailty or dual Medicaid enrollment.

Although many healthcare settings have since returned to pre-pandemic levels of operation, long-term care (LTC) facilities have experienced extended and significant changes to operations, including unprecedented levels of short staffing and facility closures, that may have a detrimental effect on resident outcomes. This study assessed the pandemic's extended effect on outcomes for LTC residents, comparing outcomes 1 and 2 years after the start of the pandemic to pre-pandemic times, with special focus on residents with frailty and dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid. Using Medicare claims data from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2022, we ran over-dispersed Poisson models to compare the monthly adjusted rates of emergency department use, hospitalization, and mortality among LTC residents, comparing residents with and without frailty and dually enrolled and non-dually enrolled residents. Two years after the start of the pandemic, adjusted emergency department (ED) and hospitalization rates were lower and adjusted mortality rates were higher compared with pre-pandemic years for all examined subgroups. For example, compared with 2018-2019, 2022 ED visit rates for dually enrolled residents were 0.89 times lower, hospitalization rates were 0.87 times lower, and mortality rates were 1.17 higher; 2022 ED visit rates for frail residents were 0.85 times lower, hospitalization rates were 0.83 times lower, and mortality rates were 1.21 higher. In 2022, emergency department and hospital utilization rates among long-term residents were lower than pre-pandemic levels and mortality rates were higher than pre-pandemic levels. These findings suggest that the pandemic has had an extended impact on outcomes for LTC residents.

Adoption of assistive technologies in long-term care homes: What the pandemic has taught us.

COVID-19 increased the use of technology in everyday life and highlighted critical applications for assistive technologies. This comparative research study explores how assistive technologies, including socially assistive robots, can be adopted by long-term care homes to mitigate the lasting effects of the pandemic. In particular, we investigated the types of assistive technologies used by long-term care facilities to help with the care of older residents and for what tasks. Furthermore, we identified barriers to adoption and proposed policy measures that encourage technology adoption.

Equity and Inclusion for LGBTQ+ Residents: Lessons Learned from the Initial Long-Term Care Equality Index (LEI)

ObjectivesMost older adults with lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, questioning, transgender, and related identities (LGBTQ+) are concerned about receiving lower-quality care and/or being mistreated in nursing homes. Older LGBTQ+ veterans may have additional reservations about care in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) nursing homes (Community Living Centers [CLCs]) because of experience with past discriminatory military policies (eg, bans on participating in military service, Don't Ask Don't Tell). This article describes one of the first VA CLCs to participate in the Human Rights Campaign–developed Long-Term Care Equality Index (LEI). DesignA single-site formative evaluation was completed to support quality improvement and identify opportunities for growth using the LEI. The LEI is a facility benchmarking tool to support more inclusive environments for LGBTQ+ residents and employees. The LEI offers 4 evaluation criteria: (1) Non-Discrimination and Staff Training; (2) LGBTQ+ Resident Services and Support; (3) Employee Benefits and Policies; and (4) Resident and Community Engagement. Facilities receive ratings based on the number of requirements achieved in each category. Participants and Methods: Older LGBTQ+ veterans, current CLC residents, interdisciplinary CLC providers and leadership, and national Geriatrics and Extended Care program managers collaborated to pilot the LEI and develop tools and materials to support other VA facilities' participation in the LEI. ResultsQualitative interviews with veterans and CLC residents supported inclusion of gender identity and sexual orientation in resident handbooks, discussions about person-centered care, and opportunities for additional staff training and community engagement (eg, observing Pride Month in June). Resources to support VA long-term care facilities' participation in the LEI were developed. Conclusions and ImplicationsThe LEI offers a structured approach to identifying areas for improvement in providing high-quality and equitable care in long-term care settings. Practical suggestions for CLCs and other nursing home settings considering the LEI for the first time are discussed.

Hospital referrals, exclusions from hospital care, and deaths among long-term care residents in the Community of Madrid during the March–April 2020 COVID-19 epidemic period: a multivariate time series analysis

BackgroundFrom March 7 to April 7, 2020, the Community of Madrid (CoM), Spain, issued interventions in response to the COVID-19 epidemic, including hospital referral triage protocols for long-term care facility (LTCF) residents (March 18–25). Those with moderate to severe physical disability and cognitive impairment were excluded from hospital referral. This research assesses changes in the association between daily hospital referrals and the deaths of LTCF residents attributable to the triage protocols.MethodsDaily hospital referrals and all-cause mortality from January to June 2020 among LTCF residents and the CoM population aged 65 + were obtained. Significant changes in LTCF resident daily hospital referrals time series, and in-LTCF and in-hospital daily deaths, were examined with tests for breaks and regimes in time series. Multivariate time series analyses were conducted to test changes in the associations between LTCF resident hospital referrals with daily deaths in-hospital and in-LTCF, and in the CoM population aged 65 + when the triage protocols were implemented.ResultsAmong LTCF residents, hospital referrals declined sharply from March 6 to March 23, 2020. Increases in LTCF residents' daily deaths occurred from March 7 to April 1, followed by a decrease reaching pre-epidemic levels after April 28. The daily ratio of in-hospital deaths to in-LTCF deaths reached its lowest values from March 9 to April 19, 2020. The four versions of the triage protocol, published from March 18 to March 25 had no impact on further changes in the association of hospital referrals with daily deaths of LTCF residents in-hospital or in-LTCF.ConclusionsWhile LTCF residents’ deaths increased, hospital referrals of LTCF residents decreased with the introduction of the CoM governmental interventions on March 7. They were implemented before the enactment of the triage protocols, protecting hospitals from collapse while overlooking the need for standards of care within LTCFs. The CoM triage protocols sanctioned the existing restrictions on hospital referrals of LTCF residents.

Health outcomes following provision of Home Medicines Reviews for older people receiving aged care services at home

BackgroundThe impact of Home Medicines Reviews (HMRs) on long-term health outcomes among individuals receiving long-term in-home aged care services is unknown. ObjectivesTo examine associations between HMR provision and hospitalization, long-term care facility (LTCF) entry and mortality among older people receiving long-term in-home aged care services. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included individuals aged 65–105 years from three Australian states who accessed in-home aged care services between 2013 and 2017. Using propensity score matching, HMR recipients (n = 1530) were matched to individuals who did not receive an HMR (n = 1530). Associations between HMR provision and outcomes were estimated using multivariable regression models. ResultsOver a median of 414 days (interquartile range 217–650) of follow-up, HMR provision was not associated with hospitalizations for unplanned events (subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) 1.04, 95%CI 0.96–1.14), falls-related hospitalizations (sHR 0.97, 95%CI 0.83–1.13), LTCF entry (sHR 0.97, 95%CI 0.83–1.13), or all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 0.86, 95%CI 0.72–1.01). ConclusionsIn a cohort of older people receiving long-term in-home aged care services, no differences in unplanned hospitalizations, falls, LTCF entry or mortality were observed those with HMRs compared to those that did not receive an HMR.

Perception of caregivers regarding the sexuality of older adults in a long-term care facility

Longevity, although a relevant aspect of human achievement, still brings unknown dynamics between the older person and their world, particularly in what regards to issues related to sexuality, which faces social stigmas. This study aims to analyze the perception of caregivers about the sexuality and sexual autonomy of the older adults in a Long-Term Care Institution. This a descriptive and exploratory study, with a qualitative approach. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with the caregivers, followed by Content Analysis by Laurence Bardin. The perceptions of the caregivers are permeated by social stigmas and sociocultural beliefs, expressed, for example, in the difficulty of defining the word sexuality, association between senility and senescence, denial of sexuality in aging, perpetuation of patterns of paternalism and infantilization of the older adult, in addition to conflicts between institutional rules and religious views of family and marriage.

An activity theory perspective on interprofessional teamwork in long-term care.

Teamwork in healthcare is shaped by reciprocal interactions among individual team members and their clinical context. Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) provides a framework to study teamwork from a developmental perspective. We observed interactions between members of an Interprofessional Healthcare Team (IHT) to identify practical guidelines for educators. Three Health Care Providers (HCPs) with more than 22-years' experience in a semi-urban LTC facility participated. We video-recorded two regular IHT meetings and selected excerpts for subsequent video-recall interviews. The excerpts were shown and discussed first with each team member, then with members in pairs and finally with all members reunited. We prompted participants to explain what was happening on the videos. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using CHAT's unit of analysis based on Activity Systems. We observed contradictions within the Activity Systems involving diverging views on outcomes of enhancing or maintaining quality of life; using non-traditional tools and spaces to sustain resident mobility; safeguarding community and patient safety despite time constraints and job titles, and unease for being paid to perform unconventional interventions. The contradictions have been grouped into three themes reflecting the Activity Systems: 1) enhancing versus maintaining quality of life; 2) improvising to achieve care goals; and 3) role fluidity. Our findings show that practical goal-oriented and contextual adaptations rely heavily on improvisation and dialogue. Educating HCPs for interprofessional teamwork should focus on developing situational awareness to foster continuous adaptation of disciplinary interventions.

Pain in Canadian Long-Term Care Homes: A Call for Action

Navigating the evaluation and management of pain in long-term care homes is a complex task. Despite an extensive body of literature advocating for a paradigm shift in pain assessment and management within long-term care homes, much more remains to be done. The assessment of pain in long-term care is particularly challenging, given that a substantial proportion of residents live with some degree of cognitive impairment. Individuals living with dementia may encounter difficulties articulating the frequency and intensity of their pain, potentially resulting in an underestimation of their pain. In Canada and in the United States, the interRAI Minimum Data Set 2.0, Minimum Data Set 3.0, and the interRAI Long-Term Care Facilities assessments are administered to capture the presence and intensity of pain. These assessment instruments are used both on admission and quarterly, offering a reliable and validated method for comprehensive assessment. Nonetheless, the daily assessment and documentation of pain across long-term care homes, which is used to inform the interRAI Pain Scale, is not always consistent. The reality is that assessing pain can be inaccurate for several reasons, including the fact that it is rated by long-term care staff with diverse levels of expertise, resources, and education. This call for action explores the current approaches used in pain assessment and management within long-term care homes. The authors not only bring attention to the existing challenges but also emphasize the necessity of considering a more comprehensive assessment approach.

Factors influencing long-term care facility performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic wreaked havoc on long-term care facilities (LTCFs). Some LTCFs performed better than others at slowing COVID-19 transmission. Emerging literature has mostly described infection prevention and control strategies implemented by LTCFs during the pandemic. However, there is a need for a comprehensive review of factors that influenced the performance of LTCFs in containing COVID-19 spread to inform public health policy.ObjectiveTo build on the existing literature, we conducted a scoping review of factors that influenced LTCF performance during the COVID-19 pandemic using a multidimensional conceptual framework of performance.MethodsWe followed the Joanna Briggs Institute’s methodology for scoping reviews. We queried CINAHL, MEDLINE (Ovid), CAIRN, Science Direct, Scopus, and Web of Science for peer-reviewed literature in English or French published between January 1st, 2020 and December 31st, 2021. Retrieved records were screened for context (COVID-19 pandemic), population (LTCFs), interest (internal and external factors that influenced LTCF performance), and outcomes (dimensions of performance: equity, accessibility, reactivity, safety, continuity, efficacy, viability, efficiency). Descriptive characteristics of included articles were summarized. Dimensions of performance as well as internal (e.g., facility characteristics) and external (e.g., visitors) factors identified to have influenced LTCF performance were presented.ResultsWe retained 140 articles of which 68% were classified as research articles, 47% originated in North America, and most covered a period between March and July 2020. The most frequent dimensions of performance were “efficacy” (75.7%) and “safety” (75.7%). The most common internal factors were “organizational context” (72.9%) and “human resources” (62.1%), and the most common external factors were “visitors” (27.1%) and “public health guidelines” (25.7%).ConclusionsOur review contributes to a global interest in understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on vulnerable populations residing and working in LTCFs. Though a myriad of factors were reported, a lack of randomized controlled trials makes it impossible to establish causality between the identified factors and LTCF performance. The use of a multidimensional framework can be recommended to evaluate healthcare system performance not merely in terms of efficacy and safety, but alongside other critical dimensions such as efficiency and equity.Trial registrationResearch Registry ID: researchregistry7026

Patient safety reporting and learning system of Catalonia (SNiSP Cat): a health policy initiative to enhance culture, leadership and professional engagement

Patient safety reporting and learning systems (PSRLS) are tools to promote patient safety culture in healthcare organisations (HCO). Many PRSLS are locally developed. WHO Global Action Plan on Patient Safety...

Indoor Air Quality Assessments in 10 Long-Term Care Facilities during the COVID-19 Pandemic, California, 2021–2023

ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess indoor air quality (IAQ) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) in California during the COVID-19 pandemic and evaluate their implementation of IAQ best practices described by public health authorities to control respiratory pathogen transmission via inhalation. DesignThis observational study conducted IAQ assessments in a convenience sample of LTCFs to gather qualitative data on the implementation of IAQ best practices. The design included 5 pilot visits to develop a standardized method of data collection and then systematic data collection at 10 facilities. Setting and ParticipantsThe study focused on 10 LTCFs across California, chosen from facilities that responded to flyers advertising free IAQ assessments. Some of the facilities had previously experienced COVID-19 outbreaks affecting residents and staff. MethodsState health department industrial hygienists performed site visits to collect data on each facility's heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) system operation, outdoor air introduction, recirculated air filtration, use of portable air cleaners, and directional airflow in isolation areas to evaluate implementation of IAQ best practices in each of these areas. Qualitative data were obtained through visual inspections and interviews with maintenance personnel. ResultsFindings indicated suboptimal implementation of IAQ best practices across the assessed facilities: no facility operated HVAC systems continuously, 40% had all outdoor air dampers open, 20% used MERV-13 or higher rated filters, 20% used portable air cleaners, and 20% performed directional airflow assessment and management for isolating COVID-19 cases. Conclusions and ImplicationsMost LTCFs assessed were not adhering to IAQ best practices, highlighting a significant opportunity for improvement. IAQ best practices described in this study are achievable with existing systems and are critical for reducing virus transmission through the air in LTCFs. The findings underscore the need for more systematic assessments and improvements in IAQ within LTCFs to protect staff and residents.

"I haven't really gone through things like this": Young long-term care workers' experiences of working during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Long-term care (LTC) facilities were hard hit by the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. Using life course theory concepts, we looked for conditions that led to worker moral distress -i.e. pain or anguish over not being able to take right action - and how life stage may influence experiences. To illuminate the experiences of adults under the age of 30 who stepped into, and/or persevered in, working in LTC during the pandemic, recognizing that this emerging workforce represents the future of LTC in Canada. This secondary analysis uses interview data from a sub-sample of 16 young workers between 18 and 29 years of age who had been working in Canadian LTC facilities for between 8 months and 7 years. Young workers expressed feeling guilt about mourning the loss of socially significant milestones as these milestones paled by comparison to the loss of life and consequences of resident isolation they witnessed at work. To manage feelings of moral distress, young workers attempted to maintain high standards of care for LTC residents and engaged in self-care activities. For some workers, this was insufficient and leaving the field of LTC was their strategy to respond to their mental health needs. The life stage of young LTC workers influenced their experiences of working during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interventions are needed to support young workers' wellbeing and job retention.

Sex-based factors influencing perceived relocation stress and glycemic control among older adults with diabetes.

This study investigated sex differences perceived relocation stress and glycemic control among older adults with type 2 diabetes in long-term care facilities. A cross-sectional correlation design was used to recruit 120 residents during their first year after moving into the facilities in southern Taiwan. The results showed that almost two-thirds of the participants (64.2%) were women. The mean age was 79.62 (SD = 1.71). Older women with diabetes were reported to have significantly lower levels of education and poor glycemic control but higher levels of perceived relocation stress than men; however, functional independence was significantly higher in men. Although perceived relocation stress significantly predicted HbA1c levels in both women and men, length of stay was also significant in predicting HbA1c levels in women. These findings indicate the need for effective physical and psychological measures to improve glycemic control during the first year of stay in long-term care facilities.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs Regarding Medical Cannabis Among Patients and Providers in Florida's Long-Term Care Facilities.

Medical cannabis (MC) has been found effective in treating multiple symptoms commonly experienced by older adults; however, residents in long-term care (LTC) often lack access to MC products. This study seeks to identify patterns and barriers to recommending MC to patients and to explore the knowledge and attitudes toward MC use among patients and providers. The quantitative portion of this study employed a survey to assess the knowledge of, attitudes toward, and barriers to MC among 126 providers in Florida LTC. Frequencies were reported, bivariate associations were analyzed, and a final regression model predicting MC knowledge was tested. In-depth interviews were conducted with 25 LTC patients, and content was analyzed using the RADaR method. The ageof the providersranged from 21 to 74; 74% were female, 18% were Black/African American, and 17% reported Hispanic ethnicity. Less than half (37.2%) felt they received adequate training on MC. Having accurate knowledge about MC was associated with greater confidence in answering patients' questions (p=0.002). Although most providers (94.2%) felt MC is a viable treatment option, the main barriers to recommending it to patients were a lack of proper training or clinical guidelines. Regarding patients, 16% reported ever using MC, and less than half (32%) had knowledge of MC or how to obtain products. Many believed it could help with symptoms and would consider its use if recommended by a doctor. However, they reported that MC was rarely recommended by providers and that they knew little about the use of this therapy. This study underscores access challenges among seniors in LTC who might benefit most from MC's therapeutic properties. Complex MC policy implementation issues are discussed. State and federal policy issues around cannabis contribute to limited research on the therapeutic uses of cannabis, as well as the MC access problem addressed in this study.

COVID-19 Frequency in Hospitalized Psychiatric Patients: A Systematic Review

Objective The COVID-19 pandemic affected individuals in different contexts (e.g. long-term care facilities, schools, communities), including psychiatric hospitals. Thus, the objective of this systematic review, duly registered and approved on PROSPERO (CRD42023427835), is to assess the frequency of positive COVID-19 cases among patients hospitalized in psychiatric hospitals. Methods A total of 4,922 articles were identified in the database searches, and 17 studies conducted in psychiatric hospitals from different regions of the world were selected. Results The frequency of positive COVID-19 cases among patients hospitalized in psychiatric hospitals ranged from 1.8% to 98.8%. Out of a total of 19,573 patients hospitalized in psychiatric hospitals, the pooled mean frequency of positive COVID-19 cases was 11.9%. The majority of patients presented COVID-19 symptoms (e.g. cough, fever and others). The COVID-19 diagnosis was primarily conducted through RT-PCR testing in 88.9% of the studies. Conclusion In conclusion, there is discrepancy in the methodology of the studies assessing the frequency of positive COVID-19 cases in psychiatric hospitals. However, this review allowed us to understand how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the population hospitalized in psychiatric hospitals.

Barriers to the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes in long-term care facilities: a scoping review.

Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) present specific challenges for the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes. A growing body of literature is dedicated to AMS in LTCFs. We aimed to summarize barriers to the implementation of full AMS programmes, i.e. a set of clinical practices, accompanied by recommended change strategies. A scoping review was conducted through Ovid-MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and Cochrane Central. Studies addressing barriers to the implementation of full AMS programmes in LTCFs were included. Implementation barriers described in qualitative studies were identified and coded, and main themes were identified using a grounded theory approach. The electronic search revealed 3904 citations overall. Of these, 57 met the inclusion criteria. All selected studies were published after 2012, and the number of references per year progressively increased, reaching a peak in 2020. Thematic analysis of 13 qualitative studies identified three main themes: (A) LTCF organizational culture, comprising (A1) interprofessional tensions, (A2) education provided in silos, (A3) lack of motivation and (A4) resistance to change; (B) resources, comprising (B1) workload and staffing levels, (B2) diagnostics, (B3) information technology resources and (B4) funding; and (C) availability of and access to knowledge and skills, including (C1) surveillance data, (C2) infectious disease/AMS expertise and (C3) data analysis skills. Addressing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in LTCFs through AMS programmes is an area of growing interest. Hopefully, this review could be helpful for intervention developers and implementers who want to build on the most recent evidence from the literature.