Most field studies suggest that competition for nutrients is important in nutrient-limited systems. Nevertheless, the mechanisms by which species avoid competition for nutrients in nutrient-poor but species-rich communities remain poorly understood. I used a model system, the carnivorous pitcher plant Sarracenia alata, to measure competition for nutrients. In a field competition experiment, I increased the potential for nutrient-niche overlap between established juvenile pitcher plants and their non-carnivorous neighbors by denying a unique source of nutrients (prey) to pitcher plants. Contrary to predictions based on nutrient-niche complementarity, prey exclusion did not reduce the performance of pitcher plants competing with non-carnivorous neighbors. Hence, differences in nutrient-source specialization did not explain the coexistence of Sarracenia alata and its non-carnivorous neighbors in the field. Instead, prey exclusion reduced the positive growth response to increased light following the removal of neighbors. By reducing allocation to pitchers in the presence of neighbors, pitcher plants appeared to reduce their demand for nutrients when shaded. I hypothesize that carnivorous plants avoid competition with non-carnivorous plants by using changes in the light environment to cue adjustments in their demand for nutrients. I suggest that such plasticity is adaptive in any long-lived perennial plant that periodically experiences simultaneous pulses of light and nutrients during its lifetime (e.g., as might occur in fire-prone habitats). Corresponding Editor: E. S. Menges