Long Head Of The Biceps Tendon Research Articles

Onlay Versus Inlay Biceps Tenodesis for Long Head of Biceps Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Proximal biceps tenodesis is a common surgical treatment of tendinosis of the long head of the biceps tendon. Two of the most common techniques incorporate onlay and inlay fixation methods, which can be done arthroscopically or open and in a variety of anatomic locations. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes between onlay versus inlay humeral fixation for biceps tenodesis for long head of the biceps tendon pathology. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Only studies reporting outcomes and complications after onlay and inlay biceps tenodeses were included. Six studies with a total of 418 patients (252 onlay, 166 inlay) with a mean age of 56.84 years were included. Visual analog pain scale scores, Constant score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score did not differ. "Popeye" deformity was found in 17 patients (7.80%) in the onlay group and in 15 patients (11.28%) in the inlay group (odds ratio, 0.28; P = 0.07). No difference in postoperative cramping or failure rates was found. Both onlay and inlay biceps tenodeses result in improved clinical outcomes and are at low risk of Popeye deformities, with no statistically significant differences between either method. Additional studies are required to assess the clinical significance of these differences.

Arthroscopic Pan-Capsular and Transverse Humeral Ligament Release with Biceps Tenodesis for Patients with Refractory Frozen Shoulder.

Arthroscopic capsular release allows direct visualization and release of inflamed tissues in refractory frozen shoulder. The reticular neural network in the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) and nerve endings of the transverse humeral ligament (THL) might be responsible for shoulder pain. We hypothesized that patients with painful refractory frozen shoulder benefited from pan-capsular release, THL release, and LHBT tenodesis. The LHBT tenodesis decreased the possibility of LHBT instability. The balance of the shoulder joint was maintained after such extensive release. From October 2013 to June 2019, patients with painful refractory frozen shoulder were enrolled consecutively at the same institute. All patients received arthroscopic pan-capsular, THL release, and suprapectoral LHBT tenodesis with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative shoulder range of motion (ROM), pain visual analog scale (PVAS), subjective shoulder value (SSV), constant score, LHBT score, acromio-humeral distance (AHD), and critical shoulder angle (CSA) were recorded. In total, 35 patients with an average age of 53.1 ± 9 years were enrolled. The average follow-up period was 24 ± 1.5 months. Forward elevation improved from 105.1° ± 17° to 147° ± 12° (p < 0.001), external rotation improved from 24.1° ± 13.3° to 50.9° ± 9.7° (p < 0.001), and internal rotation improved from L3 to T9 (p < 0.001), respectively, at final follow-up. PVAS improved from 7.3 ± 1.1 to 1.8 ± 0.6 (p < 0.001), constant score from 23.4 ± 11 to 80.7 ± 5.2 (p < 0.001), and SSV from 27.7 ± 10.5 to 77.4 ± 3.8, respectively, at follow-up. No differences were found in AHD and CSA after surgery (p = 0.316, and p = 0.895, respectively). Patients with painful refractory frozen shoulder benefited from pan-capsular and THL release. A radiographically balanced shoulder joint was maintained even after such extensive release.

Rare case of intra-articular biceps incarceration following traumatic massive rotator cuff tear

Rare case of intra-articular biceps incarceration following traumatic massive rotator cuff tear

All Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis

Background: Biceps tendinopathy can have significant clinical manifestations in active patients. Failure to achieve resolution of symptoms through nonsurgical modalities oftentimes results in surgical intervention. The 2 most common surgical treatment options for tendinopathy of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) are tenotomy and tenodesis. Both modalities have shown efficacy within the literature; however, tenodesis of the LHBT has many advantages to tenotomy. Indications: Subgroove tenodesis eliminates the potential pain generation within the bicipital groove. Despite recent proof of clinical equivalence in open versus arthroscopic tenodesis, there has been increasing interest in all-arthroscopic biceps tenodesis techniques in hopes of minimizing surgical exposure, decreasing the rate of potential neurovascular compromise, and decreasing the time to recovery. Technique: We present an all-arthroscopic technique for a subgroove biceps tenodesis using a unicortical tensionable button. The proximal biceps anchor is held in place at its insertion site with a spinal needle to prevent retraction. The lateral portal is redirected into the subdeltoid space. A novel suprapectoral biceps portal, called the Willingboro portal, is placed percutaneously 2 cm above the pectoralis tendon. Onlay fixation of the LHBT is performed proximal to the pectoralis major muscle insertion using a unicortical button. Postoperative protocol is similar to other fixation constructs. Results: Numerous arthroscopic biceps tenodesis techniques have been described with good success; however, an all-arthroscopic suprapectoral tenodesis is attractive to many reasons. The unicortical button construct shows similar load to failure strength as the bicortical button construct, both of which are greater than all other constructs described in the literature. Discussion/Conclusion: Arthroscopic subgroove biceps tenodesis using a unicortical button technique is a viable option that avoids the complications associated with an open axillary incision as well as persistent groove pain. Anchoring the biceps tendon prior to tenotomy allows for preservation of tendon length, limiting the complications associated with tendon retraction with anticipated improvement in patient-reported outcomes. The unicortical button is known to have a similar strength profile as the bicortical button technique, which is greater than other techniques described in the literature. Future studies should be aimed at assessing long-term patient-reported outcomes. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Dynamic Anterior Stabilization Using Transosseous Bone Tunnel Technique With the Adjustable Loop Length Cortical Button Incorporating High-Strength Suture Augmentation for Recurrent Shoulder Instability

Dynamic anterior stabilization using the long head of the biceps tendon is a recently described technique in the management of recurrent shoulder dislocation with subcritical bone loss. This technique involves the transfer of the long head of the biceps to the glenoid, providing sling and hammock effect. The long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon fixation can be accomplished with a variety of implants. We present a modified fixation technique of LHB tendon using transosseous bone tunnel with the adjustable loop length cortical button, incorporating high-strength suture augmentation device in a patient with recurrent glenohumeral instability with limited glenoid bone loss and an engaging Hill-Sachs defect in the humeral head.

The use of long head biceps tendon autograft for massive rotator cuff tears: a PRISMA compliant systematic review.

Rotator cuff tears (RCT) are a common cause of shoulder pain and disability, with massive RCT accounting for 10-40% of all rotator cuff tears. A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus electronic databases was performed up to August 2022, and a total of 17 scientific articles were included in the present PRISMA compliant systematic review. Understanding the geometric patterns in RCT is essential to achieve appropriate repositioning of the injured tendons in their anatomic location. The long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) is usually exposed when defects of the anterolateral corner are present and can be easily used to augment rotator cuff repairs. There are no definite guideline regarding the management of massive rotator cuff tears. The use of LHBT graft is safe and effective, but technically demanding. All studies were level IV articles of medium to high quality. Prospective long term follow-up studies and randomized controlled trials are needed, adding imaging evaluation and appropriate clinical outcome measures at follow-up.

Shoulder Anteroinferior Glenoid Labrum Reconstruction With the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Restores Glenohumeral Stability: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

The purpose of this cadaveric study was to determine feasibility and assess biomechanical stability of glenoid labral reconstruction utilizing the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) as a local autograft for labral deficient shoulders. Ten cadaveric shoulders underwent resection of all soft tissue structures except the labrum and LHBT. The scapula and humerus were separately attached to a custom shoulder testing apparatus allowing for 22.5 N of compressive isotonic force across the joint. An Instron (Electroplus 1000) measured the peak force (N) as the humeral head was translated over the anteroinferior glenoid rim through 10 cycles. Shoulders were tested in 3 separate scenarios: intact labrum, resected labrum from 3- to 6-o'clock (for a right shoulder), and labral reconstruction with the LHBT. Reconstruction was performed by performing LHBT tenotomy at the level of the pectoralis major insertion. The proximal LHBT tendon, left attached to the supraglenoid tubercle, was then attached to the anteroinferior glenoid rim with suture anchors. Mean (SD) length of the LHBT was 76.1 (12.9 mm) and the diameter was 5.9 (1.6) mm. Peak force for intact labrum was significantly greater than the deficient labrum state (14.06 vs 11.78 N; P= .012). Peak force for labral reconstruction (16.67 N) was significantly greater than both intact and deficient labral states (P < .001 and P= .011, respectively). In all specimens, the length for the LHBT to the pectoralis major insertion was sufficient for reconstruction of the labrum to the 6-o'clock position. Glenoid labrum reconstruction with the LHBT is a feasible option to restore glenohumeral stability, with peak force to displacement significantly greater than the labral-intact and labral-deficient states. This reconstruction may be an option for augmentation in the labral-deficient shoulder.

Ultrasound is more reliable than clinical tests to both confirm and rule out pathologies of the long head of the biceps: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To synthesize the literature and critically appraise current evidence to determine the most accurate physical examination (clinical test or ultrasound) to detect pathologies of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT). A search was performed on PubMed, Embase®, and Cochrane. Studies that compared the diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests or ultrasound versus arthroscopy for the assessment of LHBT pathologies were included. Seven studies were included reporting on a total of 448 patients. One study on instability using ultrasound reported sensitivity and specificity of 1.00 and 0.96, respectively. Two studies on full-thickness tears using ultrasound reported sensitivity and specificity of 0.88-0.95 and 0.71-0.98, respectively. Four studies on partial-thickness LHBT tears reported sensitivity and specificity of 0.17-0.68 and 0.38-0.92, respectively, for clinical tests, versus 0.27-0.71 and 0.71-1.00, respectively, for ultrasound. Three studies on other LHBT pathologies reported sensitivity and specificity of 0.18-0.79 and 0.53-0.85, respectively, for clinical tests, versus 0.50 and 1.00, respectively, for ultrasound. To detect LHBT pathologies, sensitivity is high-to-excellent using ultrasound, and moderate using Neer's sign and Speed's test, while specificity is high-to-excellent also using ultrasound, as well as the belly press, lift-off and Kibler's tests. The clinical relevance of these findings is that clinical tests are only reliable either to confirm or rule out LHBT pathologies, whereas ultrasound is reliable both to confirm and rule out LHBT pathologies. While diagnostic imaging cannot substitute for patient history and physical examination, the reliability and accessibility of ultrasound render it practical for routine use, particularly if clinical tests render unclear or contradictory findings. Level III.

Management of normal long head of the biceps tendon in isolated grade-1 supraspinatus tear: Research protocol for a multicenter prospective single-blind randomized study

BackgroundThe long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon is a common locus of pain in rotator cuff tear and of residual pain after tendon repair. Therefore, systematic LHB tenotomy, with or without tenodesis, is usually recommended. However, the recent literature suggests that long-term functional results of supraspinatus tendon repair are comparable between conservation of a normal biceps and tenotomy. The study objective is to compare functional results between sectioning and sparing a normal LHB in treating isolated grade-1 supraspinatus tendon tear. The study hypothesis is that sparing the normal LHB is clinically preferable to sectioning in the particular case of distal supraspinatus tear. Methods and analysisA French nationwide prospective single-blind randomized clinical study will include 194 patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of grade-1 supraspinatus tear with normal LHB. They will be randomized to 2 parallel groups: LHB sparing and sectioning. The main endpoint is Constant-Murley score, and secondary endpoints comprise ASES and SSV scores, clinical assessment of the biceps, pain on VAS, ultrasound assessment of cuff repair healing and conserved LHBs, impact on return to work and sport, pathologic assessment of sectioned LHBs, and analysis of risk factors for cuff repair failure. Ethical approval and publicationThe protocol has been approved by the data protection committee (art.L.1122-1) and meets the criteria of the Declaration of Helsinki and of the SPIRIT statement defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. Level of evidencenot applicable.

Biomechanical evaluation of subscapularis peel repairs augmented with the long head of the biceps tendon for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

Subscapularis failure is a troublesome complication following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). Commonly discarded during aTSA, the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) may offer an efficient and cheap autograft for the augmentation of the subscapularis repair during aTSA. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare a standard subscapularis peel repair to 2 methods of subscapularis peel repair augmented with LHBT. 18 human cadaveric shoulders (61±9 years of age) were used in this study. Shoulders were randomly assigned to biomechanically compare subscapularis peel repair with (1) traditional single-row repair, (2) single row with horizontal LHBT augmentation, or (3) single row with V-shaped LHBT augmentation. Shoulders underwent biomechanical testing on a servohydraulic testing system to compare cyclic displacement, load to failure, and stiffness. There were no significant differences in the cyclic displacement between the 3 techniques in the superior, middle, or inferior portion of the subscapularis repair (P>.05). The horizontal (436.7±113.3 N; P=.011) and V-shape (563.3±101.0 N; P<.001) repair demonstrated significantly greater load to failure compared with traditional repair (344.4±82.4 N). The V-shape repair had significantly greater load to failure compared to the horizontal repair (P<.001). The horizontal (61.6±8.4 N/mm; P<.001) and the V-shape (62.8±6.1; P<.001) repairs demonstrated significantly greater stiffness compared to the traditional repair (47.6±6.2 N). There was no significant difference in the stiffness of the horizontal and V-shape repairs (P=.770). Subscapularis peel repair augmentation with LHBT autograft following aTSA confers greater time zero load to failure and stiffness when compared to a standard subscapularis peel repair.

A Systematic Review of Acute Irreducible Shoulder Dislocations in the 21st Century.

Background:Rarely, closed reduction cannot be achieved in patients with acute shoulder dislocation, necessitating open management. A paucity of literature exists regarding these cases.Purpose:To perform a systematic review on the mechanism, management, and outcome data of acute irreducible shoulder dislocations.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A systematic review of the literature was performed using the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and MEDLINE between 2000 and 2020. Inclusion criteria were as follows: human participants, acute irreducible shoulder dislocation requiring open management, English language, and publication within the past 20 years. We excluded basic science articles, technique articles, reviews, editorials, and studies of chronic shoulder dislocations or dislocations with ipsilateral humeral shaft fractures.Results:Twelve articles fit the inclusion criteria and were considered for review. All studies were single case reports (level 4 evidence). Ten of the 12 studies were of male patients. The direction of dislocation included 7 anterior/anteroinferior, 2 posterior, 1 inferior, 1 bilateral inferior, and 1 superolateral. Most dislocations were irreducible owing to a mechanical block to reduction. The most common type of block was an incarcerated long head of the biceps tendon, followed by interposition of 1 of the rotator cuff tendons. The axillary and musculocutaneous nerves, displaced fracture fragments, and Hill-Sachs and bony Bankart lesions were other causes of blocks to reduction. Eleven patients were treated with open surgery, while 1 patient was treated arthroscopically. Procedures performed were dependent on concurrent pathology. Final follow-up ranged from 6 weeks to 2 years, with no repeat dislocation episodes reported. Complications after open reduction included 1 case of brachial plexopathy (posterior cord) and 1 case of musculocutaneous nerve palsy.Conclusion:There is a paucity of literature on the management of irreducible acute shoulder dislocations. The most common irreducible dislocation found in this systematic review was anterior with a mechanical block attributed to interposition of the long head of the biceps tendon. When patients were treated with an open or arthroscopic procedure, recurrence was low, with none reporting recurrent dislocation in limited follow-up.

Partial Superior Capsular Reconstruction to Augment Arthroscopic Repair of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Using Autogenous Biceps Tendon: Effect on Retear Rate

Background: Massive rotator cuff tears have a high incidence of postoperative retear that can reach 90%. It is still unclear which intervention may reduce the incidence of retear and improve the functional and clinical outcomes. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and structural outcomes at 2 years after repair of reparable massive rotator cuff tears with and without the use of partial superior capsular reconstruction (pSCR), using the autologous long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) as a graft. It was hypothesized that augmentation with a pSCR would decrease retear rates. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The authors compared arthroscopic repair of massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears with and without augmentation using the LHBT for pSCR between 2015 and 2017. After applying the selection criteria, 106 patients were included in the study and distributed into 2 groups of 50 and 56 patients. Patients in the first group (50 patients) underwent arthroscopic repair without use of the LHBT (AR group), and patients in the second group (56 patients) underwent arthroscopic repair with use of the LHBT for pSCR (AR-LHBT group). The structural outcome was evaluated by ultrasound at 2 years of follow-up. Function and pain were evaluated preoperatively and at the 2-year follow-up using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and visual analog scale (VAS). Pre- and postoperative active range of motion, including forward elevation, external rotation, and abduction, were also documented. Results: No significant differences were found between groups regarding the baseline characteristics. After 24 months, both groups showed significant improvement from preoperative ASES scores, VAS score, and active range of motion (P < .01 for all). Patients in the AR-LHBT group showed significant improvements in postoperative functional and pain scores compared with the AR group in all measurements at the 2-year follow-up (ASES score: 77.23 ± 7.45 vs 71.04 ± 9.28, P < .01; VAS score: 1.64 ± 1.03 vs 2.12 ± 1.06, P < .01). Final range of motion was significantly increased for the AR-LHBT group for forward elevation (155 [interquartile range {IQR}, 150-160] vs 150 [IQR, 140-170]; P < .01) and abduction (150 [IQR, 140-157.5] vs 120 [IQR, 100-140]; P < .01), but external rotation was significantly greater for the AR group (54.43 ± 10.55 vs 59.5 ± 10.55; P < .01). Postoperative ultrasonography at the 2-year follow-up revealed a higher retear rate in the AR group than in the AR-LHBT group (46% vs 14%; P < .01). Conclusion: Use of the LHBT for pSCR to augment massive rotator cuff tears resulted in markedly lower retear rates and modestly improved pain and function outcomes compared with repair alone.

Comparison of the effectiveness of the long head of the biceps tendon with or without proximal amputation after arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff

To compare the effectiveness of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) with or without proximal amputation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in the treatment of repairable rotator cuff tear with LHBT injury. The clinical data of 68 patients with LHBT injury combined with supraspinatus tendon tear who met the selection criteria between January 2016 and June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to whether the proximal end of LHBT was cut off or not after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, they were divided into LHBT fixation without cutting group (group A, 32 cases) and LHBT fixation with cutting group (group B, 36 cases). There was no significant difference in gender, age, operating side, preoperative supraspinatus tear width, Constant-Murley shoulder function scale, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, elbow flexion muscle strength, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The Constant-Murley shoulder function scale, UCLA score, and VAS score were used to evaluate the recovery of shoulder function before operation and at 3, 6, 12 months after operation. The acromion-humeral distance (AHD) was measured by Y-view X-ray film of the shoulder joint immediately after operation and at last follow-up. AHD and acromion-greater tubercle distance (AGT) were measured by musculoskeletal ultrasound at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of abduction. There was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups ( t=-0.740, P=0.463). Patients in both groups were followed up (13.0±0.7) months in group A and (13.1±0.8) months in group B, with no significant difference ( t=0.127, P=0.899). At last follow-up, the elbow flexor muscle strength of the two groups reached grade Ⅴ. Complications (including shoulder pain, deltoid atrophy, and rotator cuff re-tear) occurred in 6 patients (18.75%) in group A and 9 patients (25.00%) in group B, without neurovascular injury, surgical site infection, joint stiffness, LHBT spasmodic pain, and Popeye deformity. There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups ( χ 2=0.385, P=0.535). The Constant-Murley shoulder function scale, UCLA score, and VAS score significantly improved in both groups at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation ( P>0.05). The above scores in group B were significantly better than those in group A at 3 and 6 months after operation ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between the two groups at 12 months after operation ( P>0.05). Y-view X-ray film measurement of the shoulder joint showed that the AHD of the two groups at last follow-up was less than that at immediate after operation, but the difference was not significant ( Z=-1.247, P=0.212); the AHD of group A was significantly greater than that of group B at last follow-up ( t=-2.291, P=0.025). During musculoskeletal ultrasound detection of abduction and shoulder lift, there was no significant difference in the reduction degree of AHD and AGT in group A with abduction of 0°-30° compared with group B ( P>0.05). The reduction degree of AHD and AGT in group A with abduction of 30°-60°, and the reduction degree of AGT in group A with abduction of 60°-90° were significantly smaller than those in group B ( P<0.05). In arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, whether the proximal structure of LHBT is cut off or not after LHBT fixation can effectively improve the symptoms of patients and promote the recovery of shoulder joint function. Compared with preserving the proximal structure of LHBT, cutting the proximal structure of LHBT after LHBT fixation has more obvious pain relief within 6 months, and the latter had better stability above the shoulder joint.

Flexion-extension-supination test compared to arthroscopic findings of biceps long head pathology: A physical examination that reflect anatomical evolution of human shoulder girdle.

The accuracy of physical examination for diagnosing lesions of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) remains unsatisfactory. The purpose of this study was to describe a new diagnostic test, the Flexion-Extension-Supination (FES) test for diagnosing lesions of the long head of biceps tendon. A prospective study of 162 patients was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of FES test. All the participants were evaluated on the basis of their clinical presentation, physical examination (FES test), radiologic findings and arthroscopic examination. Shoulder arthroscopy findings were used as the gold standard. To reduce the omission of the hidden lesion, LHBT was checked at the intra- and the extraarticular side via arthroscopic examination. Surgical findings related to biceps pathology were as follows: rotator cuff tears, 89.5% (145/162); subacromial impingement, 8.6% (14/162); and biceps tendinitis, 1.9% (3/162). The prevalence of biceps pathology was 77.2% (125/162) of all arthroscopic procedures. No significant differences for LHBT lesions were observed between the FES test and the arthroscopic findings (P = .850). The interrater reliability of the FES test was 0.747. After excluding inconclusive results between examiners, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the FES test were 87.9%, 66.7%, 82.9%, and 63.2%, respectively. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 2.67 and 0.18, respectively. The maneuvers of the FES test irritate intra- and extraarticular lesion of LHBT. The FES test is a reproducible and reliable test that can be used during physical examinations to evaluate patients with LHBT lesions.

A Retrospective Case-Series of Patient-Reported Response to Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid Injection of the Long Head of Biceps Tendon in Orthopedic Surgery

Objective: Identify factors predictive of therapeutic success following ultrasound-guided sheath injection of the long head of the biceps tendon. Materials and Methods: A total of 162 cases were divided into three groups based on clinical responses: complete, partial, or no relief. The presence or absence of clinical symptoms, glenohumeral joint structural pathology, and treatment method was compared. Results: Of the 115 injections with follow-up, 19.1% reported no clinical response while 53.0% had a complete response. Patients with fibromyalgia or chronic spine pain were strongly associated with a poor outcome (odds ratio [OR] = 5.7, P &lt; .001). Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided intra-sheath injection is an effective method of non-surgical management for biceps tendinopathy.

Correlation between superior humeral head migration and proximal long head of biceps tendon pathology in patients with and without rotator cuff tears using magnetic resonance imaging and radiography.

BackgroundThe biomechanical role of the proximal long head of the biceps tendon (PLHB) in glenohumeral joint stability remains controversial. This retrospective study aims to correlate between humeral head migration and PLHB pathology in patients with and without rotator cuff tendon tears using imaging.MethodsSeventy-nine patients who underwent 3T magnetic resonance imaging of the shoulder were retrospectively reviewed. Imaging findings were documented by a fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologist. PLHB tendon diameter change, contour irregularity, and signal intensity change were assessed. Rotator cuff status was given a binary assignment of intact vs. torn. Radiographs were used for measurement of the acromiohumeral distance and a cutoff value of 7 mm was set as a lower limit of normal.ResultsIn the cohort of 79 shoulders, 41.8% (33/79) of patients had intact PLHB tendon and rotator cuff, 26.6% (21/79) demonstrated isolated PLHB tendon pathology, 13.9% (11/79) demonstrated isolated rotator cuff tears, and 17.7% (14/79) demonstrated concomitant PLHB tendon pathology and rotator cuff tears. Acromiohumeral distance was preserved in 97.0% (32/33) of patients with intact PLHB tendon and rotator cuff, 28.6% (6/21) of patients with isolated PLHB tendon pathology, 81.8% (9/11) of patients with isolated rotator cuff tears, and 14.3% (2/14) of patients with concomitant PLHB tendon pathology and rotator cuff tears (P < .0001).ConclusionResults of this study have shown that a statistical correlation was present between superior humeral head migration and PLHB tendon pathology with or without rotator cuff tears, compared to rotator cuff pathology alone. Findings suggest that intact PLHB tendon plays an important role in glenohumeral stability.

Paper 05: The Role of the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon in Posterior Shoulder Stabilization during Forward Flexion

Objectives:The incidence of long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) procedures is increasing, yet the role of the LHBT in glenohumeral stability is not fully understood. People lift most objects in the sagittal plane with forward flexion, which stresses the posterior aspect of the unconstrained glenohumeral joint. Determining the mechanism by which the shoulder maintains stability with functional motions is important to understanding the pathoanatomy of degenerative shoulders. We hypothesize that the LHBT resists posterior translation of the humeral head (HH) during forward flexion by tensioning the posterior capsuloligamentous complex.Methods:Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested using an established shoulder simulator, which loads the rotator cuff, deltoid and LHB tendons through a system of pulleys and weights. A motion tracking system recorded glenohumeral translations with an accuracy of ±0.2mm. In each subject, the scapula was fixed and the humerus was tested in 6 positions: 30 and 60 degrees of glenohumeral forward flexion at i) maximum internal rotation (IR), ii) neutral rotation and iii) maximum external rotation (ER) (Figure 1). The deltoid was loaded with 100N, and the infraspinatus and subscapularis were loaded with 22N each. The difference in glenohumeral translation was calculated at each position comparing the LHBT loaded with 45N or unloaded.Results:When comparing the two states of LHBT loading vs unloading, unloading the LHBT led to an overall increase in posterior and superior translation of the humeral head (Figure 2) in all tested positions (neutral, maximum internal rotation, maximum external rotation in both 30 and 60 degrees of forward flexion). At 30 degrees of glenohumeral forward flexion, unloading the LHBT increased HH posterior translation by 2.46mm (±0.92mm) (p<0.001), 1.71mm (±1.02mm) (p<0.001) and 1.02mm (±0.88mm) (p=0.014) at maximum ER, neutral rotation, and maximum IR, respectively (Figure 3). At 60 degrees of glenohumeral forward flexion, unloading the LHBT increased HH posterior translation by 2.77mm (±1.16mm) (p<0.001), 2.43mm (±1.56mm) (p<0.001) and 1.66mm (±1.42mm) (p<0.001) at maximum ER, neutral rotation and maximum IR, respectively (Figure 4). Unloading the LHBT led to more posterior translation at 60 degrees of glenohumeral forward flexion compared to 30 degrees (p=0.013).Conclusions:LHBT loading resists posterior translation of the humeral head during forward flexion. This data supports the role of the LHBT as a posterior stabilizer of the shoulder, specifically when a person is carrying objects in front of them. Biceps tenotomy or tenodesis may contribute to microinstability of the glenohumeral joint and shift contact pressure posteriorly. Further work is needed to determine if unloading the LHBT, as is done with biceps tenotomy or tenodesis, may eventually contribute to the posterior glenoid wear seen with osteoarthritis.

Poster 158: Does an In-Situ Biceps Tenodesis with an Anatomic Length-Tension Relationship affect the Incidence of Popeye Deformity and Clinical Outcomes Compared to an Estimated Length-Tension Relationship Technique?

Objectives:Biceps Popeye deformity is a common finding with rupture of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT), biceps tenodesis failure or length-tension mismatch during tenodesis. The Popeye muscle is a cosmetic deformity of the arm that may be accompanied by cramping and muscle fatigue and many patients are dissatisfied with the symptoms and appearance. Although prior studies have described physiologic landmarks to optimize the length-tension relationship during biceps tenodesis after LHBT rupture, no study has assessed the biceps muscle appearance after tenodesis “in-situ” prior to the release of the LHBT from the superior labrum for biceps tendon pathologies without complete rupture. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess clinical outcomes of an all-arthroscopic technique for biceps tenodesis which maintains the anatomic length-tension relationship of the LHBT prior to tenotomy from the superior labrum. We compared this group of patients to a control group of patients who underwent an interference screw tenodesis technique that required cutting the LHBT from the superior glenoid prior to tenodesis with an estimation of the anatomic length-tendon relationship potentially contributing to subtle biceps Popeye deformity. We hypothesize that an “in-situ” anatomic length-tension relationship tenodesis technique would reduce the risk of a Popeye deformity, reduce cramping and muscle fatigue, and have improved patient-reported outcome measures compared to an estimated length-tension relationship tenodesis with an interference screw.Methods:Consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with concomitant rotator cuff procedures were enrolled in this study from 2019-2021 and patients were grouped based on a change in senior author’s tenodesis technique, with the initial cohort having an arthroscopic interference screw subpectoral biceps tenodesis after tenotomy from the superior labrum in an “estimated” length-tension relationship technique (Group 1), and the later cohort having an arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis “in-situ” with an anatomic length-tension relationship (Group 2) with the LHBT tied to the side of the humerus with all-suture unicortical anchors. Patients were assessed at a minimum of 3-month follow-up and asked about post-operative anterior arm pain and biceps muscle spasms, and if they notice any difference in appearance between their bicep muscles on a 4-point Likert scale (none, mild, moderate, severe). Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Veterans-Rand 12, American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES), EuroQol- 5 Dimension (EQ-5D), PROMIS 10, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) were collected. Bilateral bicep images of participants were taken in three forearm positions with the elbow flexed 90 degrees: (1) maximal supination, (2) neutral, and (3) maximal pronation. Review of pronation, supination, and neutral forearm rotation bilateral biceps images were evaluated, after blinding and de-identification, by two shoulder and elbow fellowship-trained board-certified orthopedic surgeons for visual appearance and grade of Popeye deformity (none, mild, obvious Popeye). Non-parametric between-group comparison and analysis were performed with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.Results:Sixty-two patients (53% female, age 58.7 ± 9.0 years) were enrolled (33 in Group 1 and 29 in Group 2) with a mean follow-up of 9.8 ± 6.5 months. There were no significant differences between groups with respect to gender, age, and laterality of biceps tenodesis, as well as type and size of rotator cuff repair. There were no significant differences in ASES, EQ5D, and SANE scores between the two technique groups. However, PROMIS 10 Physical Health Scores were significantly improved in Group 2 (15.7 ± 2.3) compared to Group 1 (14.4 ± 2.9) (p=0.03). Patients in Group 2 experienced significantly less pain in their anterior arm than patients in Group 1 (19% vs. 33%, p=0.02) however there were no differences in biceps muscle spasm (3.4% vs. 5.2%, p=0.21). There also were no significant differences in patient-perceived biceps deformity between Group 1 (17.2%) and Group 2 (27%) (p=0.26). Similarly, there were no significant differences in surgeon-perceived biceps deformity between Group 1 and Group 2 (30.3% vs. 24.1%, p=0.47). Interrater reliability for surgeon assessment of a Popeye deformity was found to have a substantial agreement with a Kappa value of 0.77 (p <.0.001), 95% CI (0.645, 0.855).Conclusions:An arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis performed “in-situ” with an anatomic length-tension relationship did not reduce the incidence of patient or surgeon perceived Popeye muscle deformity compared to an interference screw tenodesis performed after tenotomy in an “estimated” length-tension relationship technique. Interestingly, the “in-situ” length-tension technique reduced anterior arm pain and improved PROMIS 10 physical health scores post-operatively compared to the “estimated” interference screw technique.

Poster 171: No Difference in Clinical Outcomes for Arthroscopic Suprapectoral versus Open Subpectoral Bicep Tenodesis: A Randomized Prospective Analysis

Objectives:Our group has previously reported the 1-year outcomes arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis (ASPBT) versus open subpectoral biceps for the management of long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) pathology. While patients had similar 1-year biceps strength and pain, any ongoing changes in functional outcomes is yet unknown. We aimed to directly compare clinical outcomes of ASPBT versus OSPBT with interference screw fixation, distal to the bony bicipital groove, at 2 years follow-up.Methods:Eighty-seven patients undergoing biceps tenodesis for LHBT disease were randomized into the ASPBT group or OSPBT group. Both techniques utilized polyether ether ketone (PEEK) inference screws for tenodesis fixation. Patients completed American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES), Constant subjective, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) questionnaires preoperatively, and again at 6 months, 12 months and final follow-up at minimum 24 months.Results:Seven-five patients (37/46 randomized to ASPBT [80%], 38/41 randomized to OSPBT [93%]) with a mean age of 50.3 ± 10.4 years and a mean body mass index of 28.9 ± 6.3 were included in clinical outcome analyses. Mean final follow-up was 35.1 months (ASPBT: 35.4 months, OSPBT: 34.9 months, range 24-63 months). Comparison of demographic characteristics and intraoperative findings showed no significant difference in age, gender, concomitant procedures, and rotator cuff disease. No statistically significant differences in ASES (P =.26), Constant subjective scores (P = .60), and SANE scores (P = .74) were found at final follow-up. Clinical outcomes scores showed no significant improvement from 12.6 months to final follow-up at 35.1 months (ASPBT: ASES, P=0.42; Constant, P=0.23; SANE, P=0.43 v. OSPBT: ASES, P=0.76; Constant, P=0.57; SANE, P=0.64). The mean SANE score in the ASPBT group had a statistically nonsignificant, 6.1-point increase from 1 to 3 years post-operatively (p = .23), which was greater than the minimal clinically importance difference (MCID). No patients required revision of biceps tenodesis in either group.Conclusions:No significant differences in patient-reported outcomes and complication rates were found at any time point between subjects undergoing ASPBT or OSPBT, utilizing the same interference screw technique, for the management of LHBT pathology.Table 1Patient Demographic and Other CharacteristicsTable 2Intraoperative FindingsTable 3Patient Reported Outcome measuresTable 4Patient Reported Outcome Measures Difference from 12 Months to Final Follow-Up

Axillary nerve proximity to the humeral guide pin during stemless total shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundThe proximity of the axillary nerve to the humeral head guide pin has not been described in current literature. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the anatomical relationship through a cadaveric study. MethodsTen fresh-frozen cadaveric specimen were included in this study. The standard deltopectoral approach was utilized for appropriate exposure. The subscapularis and the long head of the biceps tendon were tenotomized to access the glenohumeral joint. Humeral head cut was then visually performed with humeral sizing and positioning. A Steinmann Pin was placed and advanced into the lateral cortex. Following dissection and visualization, the distance from the axillary nerve to the point of lateral humeral cortex was measured. ResultsOn average, the axillary nerve was found 7.2 ± 3.1 mm from the tip of the Steinmann Pin at the level of the lateral humeral cortex and distal to the site of cortical penetration. DiscussionSurgeons should be aware of the relationship between the axillary nerve and the humeral guide pin, and care should be taken to protect the axillary nerve during piercing of the lateral humeral cortex during pin placement. This relationship continues to be of importance, even with evolving stemless implant systems in total shoulder arthroplasty.