Long-acting Buprenorphine Research Articles

Effectiveness of long-acting buprenorphine - A systematic review.

To analyse the evidence of the effectiveness of long-acting injection buprenorphine (LAI-B) in the management of opioid use disorder (OUD). Databases were searched for studies reporting on the effectiveness of LAI-B for the treatment of OUD. Risk of bias was assessed, and a narrative synthesis of data was presented. The study adhered to PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023396033). Eighteen studies were included in the final review: two double-blind randomised control trials, two open-label randomised control trials, two retrospective cohort studies, one non-controlled pilot study, and eleven observational studies. In comparative trials, LAI-B was superior to placebo and superior or non-inferior to treatment as usual. LAI-B was positively associated with improvements in abstinence rates and patient-centred outcomes. There was limited data on the long-term effects of continuous LAI-B prescription. LAI-B is an effective treatment for OUD with advantages over existing forms of treatment. Patients reported high levels of medication satisfaction and there were no significant safety concerns. This review highlights the need for future research on long-term effectiveness outcomes, with participants of more varied demographics and psychiatric comorbidity, which is more reflective of the OUD population seen in community clinical settings.

Characteristics of patients who are initiated on long-acting buprenorphine (Buvidal®) in France: A retrospective cross-sectional study

The long-acting buprenorphine Buvidal® is a recent type of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) used for opioid use disorder (OUD). It was initially suggested to preferentially use Buvidal® for specific OUD populations, including people in prison, or patients in recovery and on sublingual buprenorphine. We conducted a national study to examine whether the profile of patients treated with Buvidal® in France matched these initial recommendations. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in 13 national addiction centers (outside prison), using the individual medical records of patients initiated on Buvidal®. Baseline characteristics were collected and described, including sociodemographic features, comorbid medical conditions, concurrent substance use and prescription drug misuse, and OAT features before Buvidal® initiation, respectively. In total 101 patients (72.3% males, mean age 43.9±11.3years) were identified, which corresponded to one sixth of all patients treated with Buvidal® in France at the time of the study. Of them, 36 (36.4%) of them were professionally active, 35 (35.4%) were durably inactive, and the rest in an intermediary situation. Furthermore, 90 (90.0%) patients had at least one medical comorbidity (all types), and 83 (83.0%) at least one psychiatric comorbidity. Most frequent non-psychiatric comorbidities were chronic pain (n=20, 20.0%) and chronic viral infection (n=16, 17.8%). Current use of psychoactive substances included cocaine and crack (n=43, 42.6%), heroin (n=19, 18.8%), but also misuse of prescription drugs (n=20, 20%), mainly opioid analgesics. Moreover, 99 (98.0%) patients had an OAT before Buvidal® initiation, including 7 (8.1%) patients on methadone. The profile of patients initiated on Buvidal® in France was extremely similar to that of patients treated for OUD in France, either in terms of social or clinical features. While initial recommendations essentially underlined the interest of Buvidal® for some niche populations, the on-the-ground practice reveals a more widespread use, including for unrecovered patients, or patients treated with methadone.

Physiologic and behavioral effects of long-acting subcutaneous and transdermal buprenorphine in rats.

To investigate thermoregulation, thermal antinociception, food/kaolin intake, fecal output, and behavior following long-acting buprenorphine preparations in rats. 8 adult male rats (Rattus norvegicus) were administered long-acting SC buprenorphine (SB; 0.65 mg/kg), transdermal buprenorphine (TB; 10 mg/kg), and controls in a randomized, cross-over design. Body temperature, self-injury, sedation, food/kaolin intake, fecal output, and thermal withdrawal latencies were measured 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours posttreatment. Data analysis was performed with mixed linear models. Self-injury was present between 1 and 12 hours and 4 and 12 hours following TB and SB, respectively; sedation was associated with TB at 12 to 24 hours. Withdrawal latencies were longer in both TB and SB groups than in the control group. Food intake decreased with time in all groups but was significantly lower 24 to 48 hours after TB and 24 to 72 hours after SB versus controls. Kaolin intake decreased from baseline 48 to 72 hours in the control group. Fecal output decreased from baseline 24 to 72 hours in all groups but was significantly lower than controls 24 hours following TB and 24 to 48 hours in SB. Body temperature increased from baseline at 1 hour, 1 to 12 hours, and 1 to 24 hours in the control, TB, and SB groups, respectively, and was significantly higher than the control group 1 to 72 hours following TB and 4 to 24 hours after SB. Transdermal buprenorphine and SB in normal rats produced antinociception, self-injurious behavior, hyperthermia, and decreased food/fecal output. Although these buprenorphine preparations may produce antinociception, untoward effects such as hyperthermia, self-injurious behavior, and reduced food intake/fecal output may be seen.

Outcomes of Treatment With Long-Acting Buprenorphine Injection in Individuals With Opioid Use Disorder Attending a Rehabilitation Center in the UAE

Outcomes of Treatment With Long-Acting Buprenorphine Injection in Individuals With Opioid Use Disorder Attending a Rehabilitation Center in the UAE

Compared implementation of the long-acting buprenorphine treatment buvidal in four European countries

ABSTRACT Background Buvidal is the only depot buprenorphine currently available in Europe. Buvidal offers a new treatment paradigm, which may require some adjustment in the national regulatory frameworks for opioid agonist treatments (OATs), as well as the national care systems. Research design and methods Data on the national dissemination of Buvidal, types of populations treated, and the national regulatory framework and care organization system through which Buvidal has been implemented were compared between the UK, Finland, Spain, and France, using a qualitative survey. Results In 2022, the proportion of people on OAT who received Buvidal was 2.1% in the UK, 60–65% in Finland, 1% in Spain, and 0.3% in France. In both Finland and the UK, the cost of the medication is covered by the national health system, whereas, in Spain and France, Buvidal is accessible only in specialized centers, which must carry its cost. Other national features may explain the gaps in Buvidal use, including the baseline level of OAT coverage, which was high in both France and Spain Conclusions Important national discrepancies are found regarding Buvidal dissemination among people on OAT

Pharmacokinetics, Fecal Output, and Grimace Scores in Rabbits Given Long-acting Buprenorphine or Fentanyl for Postsurgical Analgesia.

The New Zealand white rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) is a frequently used surgical model. Pain management after surgery is a critical aspect of animal welfare. Recently, a long-acting buprenorphine formulation (Ethiqa XR; EXR) was approved for use in rats and mice but has not yet been investigated in rabbits. The current study aimed to determine whether a single subcutaneous dose of 0.15mg/kg of EXR could achieve and maintain therapeutic buprenorphine plasma concentrations (0.1ng/mL) for 72h in male and female rabbits. We also evaluated the safety profiles of EXR and the fentanyl patch (FP) by assessing fecal output after surgery, because opioids are known to decrease intestinal motility. Behavior and pain scores were compared for rabbits that received either EXR or the FP after undergoing an annulus puncture procedure to induce osteoarthritis. EXR at 0.15mg/kg SC provided a shorter time to onset and sustained analgesia for 72h in male and female rabbits, whereas the FP provided suboptimal analgesia after 48h. Both EXR and FP reduced fecal output after surgery. Output returned to baseline levels within 72h for the EXR group and remained slightly below baseline at 96h after surgery for the fentanyl group. Grimace pain scores revealed no significant difference between treatment groups. These results suggest that EXR is a safe and effective option for postoperative pain management in rabbits.

Barriers and facilitators to use of buprenorphine in state-licensed specialty substance use treatment programs: A survey of program leadership

IntroductionMedications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), including buprenorphine, reduce overdose risk and improve outcomes for individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD). However, historically, most non-opioid treatment program (non-OTP) specialty substance use treatment programs have not offered buprenorphine. Understanding barriers to offering buprenorphine in specialty substance use treatment settings is critical for expanding access to buprenorphine. This study aims to examine program-level attitudinal, financial, and regulatory factors that influence clients' access to buprenorphine in state-licensed non-OTP specialty substance use treatment programs. MethodsWe surveyed leadership from state-licensed non-OTP specialty substance use treatment programs in New Jersey about organizational characteristics, including medications provided on- and off-site and percentage of OUD clients receiving any type of MOUD, and perceived attitudinal, financial, and regulatory barriers and facilitators to buprenorphine. The study estimated prevalence of barriers and compared high MOUD reach (n = 36, 35 %) and low MOUD reach (n = 66, 65 %) programs. ResultsMost responding organizations offered at least one type of MOUD either on- or off-site (n = 80, 78 %). However, 71 % of organizations stated that fewer than a quarter of their clients with OUD use any type of MOUD. Endorsement of attitudinal, financial, and institutional barriers to buprenorphine were similar among high and low MOUD reach programs. The most frequently endorsed government actions suggested to increase use of buprenorphine were facilitating access to long-acting buprenorphine (n = 95, 96 %), education and stigma reduction for clients and families (n = 95, 95 %), and financial assistance to clients to pay for medications (n = 90, 90 %). ConclusionsAlthough non-OTP specialty substance use programs often offer clients access to MOUD, including buprenorphine, most OUD clients do not actually receive MOUD. Buprenorphine uptake in these settings may require increased financial support for programs and clients, more robust education and training for providers, and efforts to reduce the stigma associated with medication among clients and their families.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of drug liking blockade by buprenorphine subcutaneous depot (CAM2038) in participants with opioid use disorder

Buprenorphine is used to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Weekly and monthly subcutaneous long-acting buprenorphine injections (CAM2038) provide more stable buprenorphine plasma levels and reduce the treatment burden, misuse, and diversion associated with sublingual transmucosal buprenorphine formulations. To characterize the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship, a maximum inhibition (Imax) model was developed relating CAM2038 buprenorphine plasma concentration to drug liking maximum effect (Emax) visual analog scale (VAS; bipolar) score after intramuscular hydromorphone administration. Data included time-matched observations of buprenorphine plasma concentration and drug liking Emax VAS score after hydromorphone 18 mg administration in 47 non-treatment-seeking adults with moderate to severe OUD in a phase 2 study. Analysis used non-‍linear mixed-effects modeling (NONMEM®). The final Imax model adequately described the PK/PD relationship between buprenorphine plasma concentration and drug liking Emax VAS score. Simulations showed drug liking was effectively blocked at low buprenorphine plasma concentrations (0.4 ng/mL) where the upper 95% confidence interval of the drug liking Emax VAS score was below the pre-defined 11-point complete blockade threshold. The buprenorphine plasma concentration required to achieve 90% of the maximal effect (IC90) of drug liking was 0.675 ng/mL. Interindividual variability in responses to buprenorphine was observed; some participants experienced fluctuating responses, and a few did not achieve drug liking blockade even with higher buprenorphine plasma concentrations. This affirms the need to individualize treatment and titrate doses for optimal treatment outcomes. PK/PD models were also developed for desire to use VAS and Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) scores, with results aligned to those for drug liking.

ADVANCES IN THE TREATMENT OF ALCOHOL, OPIOID, AND CANNABIS ADDICTION

Substance use disorders, particularly those involving alcohol, opioids, and cannabis, present significant challenges in healthcare due to their widespread impact and complex nature. Recent advances in the treatment of these addictions offer new hope and more effective strategies for addressing these pervasive issues. This presentation will explore the latest developments in pharmacological, behavioral, and integrative approaches to treating alcohol, opioid, and cannabis addiction. For alcohol use disorder, pharmacotherapies such as acamprosate and extended-release naltrexone have shown promise in reducing cravings and relapse rates. Advances in behavioral therapies, including cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and mindfulness-based interventions, have also proven effective in combination with medication. In the realm of opioid addiction, the introduction of long-acting buprenorphine formulations and the growing use of extended-release injectable naltrexone have revolutionized treatment, providing patients with more convenient and less stigmatizing options. The role of harm reduction strategies, such as supervised consumption sites and the distribution of naloxone, will also be discussed. For cannabis use disorder, emerging research highlights the potential of cannabinoid receptor antagonists, such as rimonabant, NAC and the application of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) and contingency management (CM) as effective treatment modalities. This presentation will also address the importance of personalized treatment plans, integrating pharmacological and behavioral approaches tailored to individual patient needs. The discussion will include insights into the role of technology in addiction treatment, such as telemedicine and digital therapeutics, which are expanding access and improving outcomes. By examining these advances, this presentation aims to provide healthcare professionals with a comprehensive overview of current best practices and innovative strategies for treating alcohol, opioid, and cannabis addiction, ultimately contributing to more effective patient care and better long-term outcomes.

Long-Acting Buprenorphine Formulations as a New Strategy for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder.

Long-acting buprenorphine formulations have been recently marketed for the Opioid Agonist Treatment (OAT) of opioid use disorder (OUD) associated with medical, social, and psychological support. Their duration of action ranges from one week up to 6 months. The non-medical use of opioids is increasing with a parallel rise in lethal overdoses. Methadone and buprenorphine are the standard treatment for opioid dependence. Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) is widely recognized as one of the most effective ways of reducing the risks of overdose, crime, and transmission of HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) in people who use opioids; however, its effectiveness has been hindered by low rates of uptake and retention in treatment. Furthermore, both methadone and buprenorphine are widely diverted and misused. Thus, a crucial aspect of treating OUD is facilitating patients' access to treatment while minimizing substance-related harm and improving quality of life. The newly developed long-acting buprenorphine formulations represent a significant change in the paradigm of OUD treatment, allowing an approach individualized to patients' needs. Strengths of this individualized approach are improved adherence (lack of peaks and troughs in blood concentrations) and a reduced stigma since the patient doesn't need to attend their clinic daily or nearly daily, thus facilitating social and occupational integrations as the quality of life. However, less frequent attendance at the clinic should not affect the patient-physician relationship. Therefore, teleconsulting or digital therapeutic services should be developed in parallel. In addition, diversion and intravenous misuse of buprenorphine are unlikely due to the characteristics of these formulations. These features make this approach of interest for treating OUD in particular settings, such as subjects staying or when released from prison or those receiving long-term residential treatment for OUD in the therapeutic communities. The long-lasting formulations of buprenorphine can positively impact the OUD treatment and suggest future medical and logistic developments to maximize their personalized management and impact.

Utilization of Opioid Agonist Therapies in Canada


 Canada continues to experience an opioid crisis that has had a devastating impact on public health, highlighting the importance of management strategies for opioid use disorder (OUD). Several opioid agonist therapies (OATs) for the management of OUD are available in Canada, including recent approvals of new brand name drugs and generic versions of widely used OATs.
 Coverage criteria for OATs are comparable across public drug plans in Canada. Methadone hydrochloride (HCL) and the combination of buprenorphine HCL and naloxone HCL (buprenorphine HCL-naloxone HCL) are typically listed as regular or open benefits; generics for these 2 medications have been available since 2020 and 2013, respectively. Sublocade and Probuphine — long-acting buprenorphine preparations approved by Health Canada in 2018 — have varied coverage that is often dependent on prior therapy requirement.
 The annual number of public claims for OATs decreased by 19.5% from 2018 to 2022. The market share of claims during this period was dominated by methadone HCL and buprenorphine HCL-naloxone HCL, with an increase in claims market share for buprenorphine over time (starting in 2020) and a negligible contribution by buprenorphine HCL. Additionally, in a subanalysis on the number of OAT claimants, the results did not indicate a decrease in individual beneficiaries for these medications; therefore, the decrease in OAT claims was likely driven by increased usage of OATs that require fewer claims per patient, as opposed to decreased OAT use in the population.
 Despite the decrease in annual OAT claims during the analysis period, total OAT expenditures increased every year, with a 67.0% increase from 2018 to 2022 (5-year total of $307 million). The increase was initially driven by buprenorphine HCL-naloxone HCL, which increased from $27 million (58.9% of OAT expenditures) in 2018 to $39 million (67.2% of OAT expenditures) in 2019. Thereafter, expenditures for buprenorphine drove overall OAT cost increases from 2020 onward, accounting for $22 million (28.2% of OAT expenditures) in 2022. In contrast, methadone HCL accounted for a decreasing proportion of expenditures each year ($19 million or 41.1% of OAT expenditures in 2018 to $16 million or 21.0% of OAT expenditures in 2022), despite having the greatest proportion of claims throughout the study period.
 The availability of new OAT formulations and generic versions of existing products, as well as other notable regulatory policy changes (e.g., Health Canada’s removal of the need for an exemption to prescribe methadone HCL) and reimbursement decisions (e.g., positive reimbursement recommendations from CADTH for the newer branded OATs, Sublocade and Probuphine), impacted the observed utilization and expenditure patterns, and will likely continue to influence decision-making, particularly where coverage has recently changed or has yet to change to reflect the evolving landscape. If the utilization of injectable buprenorphine (Sublocade) continues at the rate observed in this analysis, it will likely continue to drive increases in OAT expenditures; Sublocade has several patents and the earliest patent expiry is not until 2031, so generic versions of this formulation will likely not be available for several more years. Overall, the findings of this analysis may help to inform jurisdictions in funding decisions regarding OATs for the treatment of OUD.

Impact of long-acting buprenorphine injection on methamphetamine use: A retrospective cohort study.

The aim is to assess the impact of long-acting buprenorphine (LAI-BNP) on frequency of methamphetamine (MA) use. We undertook an observational, descriptive, retrospective cohort study of patients of a public, tertiary, community-based Alcohol and Other Drug Service (AODS) with opioid use disorder (OUD) treated with LAI-BNP who are current or past users of MA. We assessed the changes of frequency of use in their MA use at start (baseline), 3 and 6months of LAI-BNP. Study included 59 participants. Based on their MA use at the commencement of LAI-BNP, the sample was further sub-grouped as active users (n = 30) and past users (n = 29). At 6months of LAI-BNP, all the past users remained abstinent from MA use. 70% (n = 21) of participants with active MA use had reduced or ceased their MA use while 17% (n = 5) increased their MA use at 6months. The results favour the use of LAI-BNP as a potential treatment for MA use.

Comparative Pharmacokinetics and Injection Site Histopathology in Nude Mice Treated with Long-acting Buprenorphine Formulations.

Two long-acting formulations of buprenorphine are commercially available as analgesics for rodents. However, these drugs have not yet been studied in nude mice. We sought to investigate whether the manufacturer-recommended or labeled mouse doses of either drug would provide and sustain the purported therapeutic plasma concentration of buprenorphine (1 ng/mL) over 72 h in nude mice and to characterize the injection site histopathology. NU/NU nude and NU/+ heterozygous mice were subcutaneously injected with extended-release buprenorphine polymeric formulation (ER; 1 mg/kg), extendedrelease buprenorphine suspension (XR; 3.25 mg/kg), or saline (2.5 mL/kg). Plasma concentrations of buprenorphine were measured 6, 24, 48, and 72 h after injection. The injection site was examined histologically at 96 h after administration. XR dosing yielded significantly higher plasma buprenorphine concentrations than did ER dosing at every time point in both nude and heterozygous mice. No significant difference in plasma buprenorphine concentrations were detected between nude and heterozygous mice. Both formulations yielded plasma levels of buprenorphine of over 1 ng/mL at 6 h; XR sustained buprenorphine plasma levels above 1 ng/mL for over 48 h, whereas ER sustained this level for over 6 h. Injections sites of both formulations were characterized by a cystic lesion with a fibrous/fibroblastic capsule. ER induced more inflammatory infiltrates than did XR. This study indicates that while both XR and ER are suitable for use in nude mice, XR has a longer duration of likely therapeutic plasma levels and induces less subcutaneous inflammation at the injection site.

The impact of COVID-19 on the treatment of opioid use disorder in carceral facilities: a cross-sectional study

While the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare delivery everywhere, persons with carceral system involvement and opioid use disorder (OUD) were disproportionately impacted and vulnerable to severe COVID-associated illness. Carceral settings and community treatment programs (CTPs) rapidly developed protocols to sustain healthcare delivery while reducing risk of COVID-19 transmission. This survey study assessed changes to OUD treatment, telemedicine use, and re-entry support services among carceral and CTPs participating in the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)-funded study, Long-Acting Buprenorphine vs. Naltrexone Opioid Treatments in Criminal Justice System-Involved Adults (EXIT-CJS) study. In December 2020, carceral sites (n = 6; median pre-COVID 2020 monthly census = 3468 people) and CTPs (n = 7; median pre-COVID 2020 monthly census = 550 patients) participating in EXIT-CJS completed a cross-sectional web-based survey. The survey assessed changes pre- (January–March 2020) and post- (April–September 2020) COVID-19 in OUD treatment, telemedicine use, re-entry supports and referral practices. Compared to January–March 2020, half of carceral sites (n = 3) increased the total number of persons initiating medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) from April–September 2020, while a third (n = 2) decreased the number of persons initiated. Most CTPs (n = 4) reported a decrease in the number of new admissions from April–September 2020, with two programs stopping or pausing MOUD programs due to COVID-19. All carceral sites with pre-COVID telemedicine use (n = 5) increased or maintained telemedicine use, and all CTPs providing MOUD (n = 6) increased telemedicine use. While expansion of telemedicine services supported MOUD service delivery, the majority of sites experienced challenges providing community support post-release, including referrals to housing, employment, and transportation services. During the COVID-19 pandemic, this small sample of carceral and CTP sites innovated to continue delivery of treatment for OUD. Expansion of telemedicine services was critical to support MOUD service delivery. Despite these innovations, sites experienced challenges providing reintegration supports for persons in the community. Pre-COVID strategies for identifying and engaging individuals while incarcerated may be less effective since the pandemic. In addition to expanding research on the most effective telemedicine practices for carceral settings, research exploring strategies to expand housing and employment support during reintegration are critical.

Long-acting depot buprenorphine in people who are homeless: Views and experiences

IntroductionPeople experiencing homelessness often experience intersecting mental and physical health problems, alongside problem substance use and a range of overlapping challenges, including access to appropriate treatment. New long-acting opioid replacement therapies (ORT) offer potential benefits for this group. This study explored the views of people who are homeless and dependent on prescribed or illicit opiates/opioids on the range of ORT delivery options, including long-acting buprenorphine (LAB) depot injection, methadone liquid, and sublingual/wafer buprenorphine. MethodsThe research team conducted three focus groups (n = 9 participants) and individual interviews (n = 20) with people living in Scotland and Wales. We sought to explore participants' experiences and views on a range of ORT options, and to explore experiences and perceptions of the acceptability and utility of LAB for this group. ResultsTwenty-nine people participated (8 women, 21 men) and described experiences of poor mental health and interaction with the criminal justice system, including prison. All had experience of ORT and some had a preference for the “comfort” of methadone while others liked the clear headedness of buprenorphine. Participants saw LAB as a valuable addition to the treatment options. Potential benefits included freedom from the challenges associated with daily dispensing and the freedom to be able to attend to their priorities and regain control over their day-to-day lives. LAB naïve participants required reassurance regarding the duration of effect and wanted information and evidence from both their health care providers and their peers. ConclusionParticipants generally recognized the potential of LAB. The research team identified crucial themes for those experiencing homelessness: emotions, trust, and time. A move to LAB represents a shift in the locus of control to the individual, which, for some is exciting, but for others is daunting. Providers should address this shift in control, and it must to be central to joint decision-making on whether someone is ready for LAB, the information they require to help them decide, and the support they will require during treatment.

Recovery from opioid use disorder: A 4-year post-clinical trial outcomes study

BackgroundOpioid use disorder (OUD) seriously impacts public health in the United States. However, few investigations of long-term outcomes following treatment with medication for OUD exist. Additionally, these studies have prioritized opioid use and treatment utilization outcomes, and a gap in knowledge regarding long-term, multidimensional trajectories of OUD recovery exists. This study investigated a diverse array of outcomes for individuals with OUD at an average of 4.2 years post clinical trial participation. MethodsIndividuals who previously participated in long-acting buprenorphine subcutaneous injection clinical trials (NCT023579011; NCT025100142; NCT02896296) and enrolled in The Remission from Chronic Opioid Use-Studying Environmental and SocioEconomic Factors on Recovery (RECOVER; NCT03604861) Study participated in a follow up assessment (n = 216). Substance use, psychosocial, opioid dependence, and delay discounting outcomes were assessed. Regression analyses were conducted to determine significant associations between psychosocial/opioid dependence variables and both recent opioid use and delay discounting. ResultsThe majority of participants reported abstinence from opioids since the last RECOVER study assessment (mean 2.26 years; 55%) and in the past 30 days (69%). Participants reported low levels of depression and psychological distress. Positive associations between depression and opioid craving with past 30-day opioid misuse and delay discounting, and negative associations between quality of life and treatment effectiveness with these outcomes were observed. ConclusionsThis study examined longer term OUD recovery outcomes. Participants reported high levels of abstinence from opioids and psychosocial functioning. These encouraging results highlight the multidimensional nature of recovery from OUD, and further support the effectiveness of buprenorphine as an OUD treatment.

An observational study on the use of long acting buprenorphine (Sublocade) and a Tamper resistant PICC for Outpatient IV antibiotic administration in Patients with serious infections and Opioid Use Disorder; The STOP OUD project

What is STOP OUD?The STOP OUD project is an observational study on the use of long-acting buprenorphine (Sublocade) and a Tamper resistant PICC clamp for Outpatient IV antibiotic administration in Patients with serious infections and Opioid Use Disorder (STOP OUD). BackgroundThe US opioid crisis is driving up serious infections related to intravenous drug use. These infections require prolonged courses of antibiotics, often resulting in lengthy hospital stays. Extended hospitalizations for monitored parenteral antibiotics for patients with opioid use disorder are challenging for patients, reduce bed capacity, and are associated with significant cost. This observational study reviews the administration of intravenous (IV) antibiotics in a monitored outpatient setting using long-acting injectable buprenorphine (Sublocade, Indivior Inc., North Chesterfield, VA) and a tamper resistant clamp in patients with opioid use disorder . MethodsLong-acting buprenorphine and a tamper resistant clamp were used to treat patients with serious infections and opioid use disorder as outpatients. ResultsHospital days avoided were 30-days per STOP OUD project participant. Eleven of thirteen STOP OUD project participants completed their antibiotic courses as prescribed, there was no evidence of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) tampering, and they rated their care as a mean of 4.9/5 (SD 0.4). Institutional savings per STOP OUD patient was $33,000. Outpatient infusion costs were $9,300 for a net savings of $23,700 per STOP OUD project participant. Infections resolved in all participants. ConclusionsThe STOP OUD project reduced hospital length of stay for patients with opioid use disorder and serious infections, and had a favorable financial impact.

Recent advances in the treatment of opioid use disorders-focus on long-acting buprenorphine formulations.

Oral methadone or sublingual buprenorphine are first-line medications for pharmacotherapy of opioid use disorders (OUDs). Three long-acting buprenorphine depot or implant formulations are currently available for the treatment of OUDs: (1) CAM 2038 (Buvidal) for subcutaneous weekly and monthly application; (2) RBP-6000 (Sublocade™) as a monthly depot formulation; and (3) A six-month buprenorphine implant [Probuphine™]. The pharmacology, clinical efficacy and prospects of these medications are discussed.

Long-acting buprenorphine injectables: Opportunity to improve opioid use disorder treatment among rural populations

The opioid epidemic continues with escalating overdose deaths further exacerbated by the coronavirus pandemic, despite having efficacious medication treatments for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Most persons with OUD remain undiagnosed, without ever receiving MOUD, and even among those who initiate MOUD, retention is infrequently longer than 6 months (Williams et al., 2019). Treatment access remains particularly problematic in rural areas that often have few providers and limited resources (Ghertner, 2019). There are two new injectable long-acting buprenorphine (LAB) formulations recently approved in the United States and abroad (Lofwall et al., 2018; Walsh et al., 2017; Haight et al., 2019). They hold promise to improve treatment access and retention by decreasing risks of nonadherence, diversion and misuse and may be particularly attractive during a pandemic in order to minimize provider and pharmacy contacts (Roberts et al., 2020) and help improve access to care in rural areas. There are several ongoing evaluations of LAB injectables in large multi-site randomized clinical trials sponsored by the National Institute on Drug Abuse and Veterans Administration Office of Research and Development in settings with special populations that exist in both urban and rural settings. Understanding the potential clinical benefits of LAB injectables along the care continuum, particularly for rural areas is essential to successful implementation in the complex healthcare system.

Long-acting buprenorphine vs. naltrexone opioid treatments in CJS-involved adults (EXIT-CJS)

The EXIT-CJS (N = 1005) multisite open-label randomized controlled trial will compare retention and effectiveness of extended-release buprenorphine (XR-B) vs. extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) to treat opioid use disorder (OUD) among criminal justice system (CJS)-involved adults in six U.S. locales (New Jersey, New York City, Delaware, Oregon, Connecticut, and New Hampshire). With a pragmatic, noninferiority design, this study hypothesizes that XR-B (n = 335) will be noninferior to XR-NTX (n = 335) in retention-in-study-medication treatment (the primary outcome), self-reported opioid use, opioid-positive urine samples, opioid overdose events, and CJS recidivism. In addition, persons with OUD not eligible or interested in the RCT will be recruited into an enhanced treatment as usual arm (n = 335) to examine usual care outcomes in a quasi-experimental observational cohort.