LABA Research Articles

Implementation of quality by design and green chemistry principles to validate the stability indicating method on UHPLC for the simultaneous quantification of Glycopyrronium, Fluticasone, Vilanterol in inhaled formulation

The combination of Glycopyrronium, Fluticasone, and Vilanterol is utilized to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and mitigate asthma symptoms. Glycopyrronium functions as an anticholinergic compound, Fluticasone serves as a corticosteroid that mitigates inflammation, and Vilanterol operates as a long-acting beta-agonist that facilitates the relaxation of the bronchial passages. The simultaneous quantification of Glycopyrronium, Vilanterol, and Fluticasone was accomplished through the utilization of Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC) employing a Symmetry Shield C18 column (4.6 mm x 100 mm ID, 2.6µm particle size), with a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min, and a gradient elution employing pH 3.0 Ammonium Formate as mobile phase A and ethanol as mobile phase B. By the guidelines delineated by the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Q2, method validation encompassed specificity (with the purity angle for the three chromatographic peaks exceeding the purity threshold under all degradation conditions), linearity (exhibiting an R² value greater than 0.999 from the lower limit of quantification to 200%), accuracy (with recovery rates ranging from 95% to 105%), robustness (the influence of variations in mobile phase buffer pH, column temperature, and flow rate was scrutinized utilizing Analytical Quality by Design principles), and assessments of method precision. The Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI), Analytical Greenness (AGREE), and analytical eco-scale evaluations substantiated the method's advantageous characteristics regarding environmental sustainability.

Association of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity with reduction of acute exacerbation in COPD patients using a dual ultra-long-acting bronchodilators

Inhaler therapy and physical activity (PA) are important methods of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management. This study aimed to investigate the additional benefit of moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) in patients with COPD using a long-acting beta-agonists (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) combination. We emulated a target trial to estimate the benefit of MVPA in patients with COPD using a dual ultra-long-acting bronchodilators. We enrolled patients aged ≥ 40 who were diagnosed with COPD between 2014 and 2018, initiated a LABA/LAMA combination, and had not undergone regular MVPA. The main exposure was the initiation of MVPA, defined as vigorous aerobic exercise > 20 min per day on ≥ 3 days/week or moderate aerobic exercise > 30 min per day on ≥ 5 days/week. The main outcomes were the future usage of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and severe exacerbation. We identified 1,526 patients who initiated MVPA and 4,516 who did not. The median follow-up period was 3.0 years. The hazard ratio (HR) for future ICS usage in the MVPA initiation group was 0.83 (95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.72, 0.97) compared to the control group. The HR for severe exacerbation in the MVPA initiation group was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.96) compared to the control group. Subgroup analyses by age, sex, body mass index, residence area, smoking and drinking status showed consistent benefits in these outcomes. Initiation of MVPA may offer an additional benefit for even COPD patients who use a dual ultra-long-acting bronchodilators.

An Overview of Pathological Pathway of Asthma and Molecular Mechanisms of Anti-Asthmatic Phytoconstituents

: Asthma presents with chronic inflammation and airway constriction triggered by allergens or pollution. Inflammatory mediators such as histamine and leukotrienes, released in response to inflammation, prompt bronchoconstriction, contracting the smooth muscles around the airways. This constriction obstructs airflow and worsens symptoms such as coughing, wheezing, and breathlessness. Additionally, airways become hyperresponsive, reacting excessively even to harmless stimuli. Persistent inflammation leads to the production of thick mucus, further blocking airflow and worsening symptoms. Mast cell-released histamine triggers bronchoconstriction, leukotrienes, and prostaglandins (eg, Interleukin-4, Interleukin-13) and promotes airway inflammation while cytokines drive Th2-mediated immune responses. Current therapies in asthma include long-acting beta agonists, leukotriene modifiers, inhaled corticosteroids, and immunomodulators. Natural products, due to their anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and immunomodulatory properties, have emerged as promising anti-asthmatic candidates. Polyphenols (quercetin, resveratrol, curcumin, etc.) and Omega-3 fatty acids offer anti-inflammatory benefits by suppressing cytokines and oxidative stress. Natural products intervene at various levels of these pathways. Quercetin inhibits the release of mast cell histamines, alleviating bronchoconstriction. Curcumin suppresses Th2 cytokines, mitigating the allergic response. Omega-3 fatty acids modulate leukotriene and prostaglandin production, reducing airway inflammation. This review concludes that natural phytobioactives have potential in asthma management due to their complex mechanisms that target various immuno-inflammatory mediators.

Greenness assessment of a molecularly imprinted polymeric sensor based on a bio-inspired polymer

Methyldopa, a synthesized dopamine substitute with phenolic, amine, and carboxylic groups, was used to create a selective molecular imprinted polymer (MIP) for detecting formoterol fumarate dihydrate (FFD), a long-acting beta2-agonist for asthma and COPD. The bio-inspired polymer (MD) was electro-grafted onto a pencil graphite electrode (PGE) using cyclic voltammetry in a phosphate buffer (pH 6.5). An indirect method involving a redox probe (ferrocyanide/ferricyanide) and differential pulse voltammetry measured FFD binding to the MIP’s 3D cavities. The sensor showed a linear response range from 1 × 10⁻⁹ M to 2 × 10⁻¹⁰ M, with a detection limit of 1.7 × 10⁻¹¹ M. The polymethyldopa (PMD) and FFD interaction was assessed by UV spectroscopy, and the method was validated per ICH guidelines. Green analytical approaches, including RGB and GAPI, were also implemented. The goal was to use advances in molecularly imprinted polymers to develop a more precise and selective electrochemical sensor for FFD quantification.

In Vitro Analysis of Aerodynamic Properties and Co-Deposition of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Fluticasone Furoate, Umeclidinium Bromide, and Vilanterol Trifenatate.

Effective airway delivery of a fixed-dose combination of triple-aerosolized inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta agonist (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) is likely to positively affect therapeutic responses predicted in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This study aimed to conduct in vitro fluticasone furoate, vilanterol trifenatate, and umeclidinium bromide depositions in a Next Generation Impactor. The aerodynamic properties of these inhaled medications influence the spatial distribution and drug abundance, particularly in the smaller airways, to reverse or alleviate disease pathology. The Next Generation Impactor was used to demonstrate the aerodynamic particle size distributions of fluticasone furoate, vilanterol trifenatate, and umeclidinium bromide delivered from a dry powder inhaler at different flow rates across all stages of the impactors. This in vitro study analyzed the distribution pattern of individual drug components to simulate mono-component deposition and co-deposition in the official model in the United States Pharmacopeia. An Andersen cascade impactor together with scanning electron microscope-energy-dispersive X-ray was employed to observe the drug deposition on each stage of the impactor. We found that the distribution pattern of each component at the same cascade level was comparable, and the aerosol particles of the three drugs reached the in vitro representation of the lower airway compartment. The specified flow rates generated the desired fine particle fraction, fine particle dose, and mass median aerodynamic diameter. Our results also demonstrated visualized deposition patterns of the delivered drugs from different stages of the cascade impactor that may predict deposition as it occurs in vivo. Spatial distribution and abundance of ICS/LABA/LAMA in the same cascade levels were closely comparable, and the aerosol particles were able to reach the small aerosol-sized cascades at the lower levels to some extent.

Triple Therapy De-Escalation and Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroids to Dual Bronchodilator Therapy in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background/Objectives: The interpretation of evidence on the de-escalation of triple therapy with the withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) to dual bronchodilator therapy with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is conflicting. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ICS discontinuation from LABA-LAMA-ICS triple therapy compared to its continuation. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web Of Science, clinicaltrial.gov, and CENTRAL for RCTs and observational studies from inception to 22 March 2024, investigating the effect of triple therapy de-escalation with the withdrawal of ICSs to dual therapy on the risk of COPD exacerbation, pneumonia, and lung function. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024527942. Results: A total of 3335 studies was screened; 3 RCTs and 3 real-world non-interventional studies were identified as eligible. The analysis of the time to the first moderate or severe exacerbation showed a pooled HR of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.80-1.15; I2 = 77%) for ICS withdrawal compared to triple therapy continuation. The analysis according eosinophil levels showed that COPD subjects with ≥300 eosinophils/µL had a significant increase in the incidence of moderate or severe exacerbations when de-escalated to LABA/LAMA (pooled HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.00-1.82; I2: 56%). ICS withdrawal did not significantly affect the risk of mortality and pneumonia. Conclusions: The de-escalation of triple therapy with ICS withdrawal does not affect the main outcomes evaluated (moderate or severe exacerbations, change in trough FEV1). COPD patients with high blood eosinophils (≥2% or ≥300 cells/µL) are most likely to benefit from continuing triple therapy.

Benefit of dual bronchodilator therapy on exacerbations in former and current smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in real-world clinical practice: a multicenter validation study (TOReTO)

BackgroundDual bronchodilator therapy, consisting of a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), has proven effective for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, it remains uncertain whether there are efficacy differences between current and former smokers with COPD. This study aims to explore the effectiveness of LABA/LAMA therapies in both these groups.MethodsThe TOReTO trial assessed lung function, symptoms, health status, the occurrence of exacerbations, clinically significant exacerbations, and the use of LABA/LAMA therapies. These therapies include Tio/Olo, umeclidinium/vilanterol (Umec/Vi), and umeclidinium/vilanterol (Umec/Vi) are used in patients with COPD. The study examined the differences in outcomes between current and former smokers. To balance the baseline characteristics, propensity score matching (PSM) was employed.ResultsData from 967 patients were collected. After PSM, the time to the first acute exacerbation in current smokers was analyzed separately for the three treatment groups and was significantly different between them (p = 0.0457). Among, there are differences in the occurrence of acute exacerbation between treatment and smoking status in Umec/Vi (p = 0.0114). There is no significant difference in the treatment of former smokers among the three different groups of LABA/LAMA fixed-dose combinations (p = 0.3079). COPD-related symptoms remained stable throughout the treatment period. There were no significant differences in symptom scores, including CAT and mMRC, among the three groups at the end of the study.ConclusionsThe three fixed-dose combinations of LABA/LAMA showed no difference in reducing exacerbations in former smokers but did show differences in current smokers. This trend has clinical significance, and future research will be conducted to control influencing variables to validate this point. However, due to the non-randomized study design, these findings should be interpreted with caution.

Study of blood eosinophils and plasma periostin as biomarkers for response of COPD patients to ICS/LABA treatment

BackgroundEosinophilic airway inflammation has been detected in up to 40% of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients during stable periods of the disease, and increased sputum eosinophil count was associated with better lung function, more future exacerbations, and symptoms that responded better to treatment with inhaled and oral corticosteroids.The aim of this work was to investigate the relationship of blood eosinophils and plasma periostin with lung function changes related to ICS and long-acting beta2-agonist combination treatment in stable COPD patients for 3 months.MethodsThis prospective experimental study was carried out on 50 COPD patients with post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio < 70%. Patients collected from outpatient clinics of Chest Department Tanta University Hospitals, Tanta Chest Hospital, and Mansoura Chest Hospital from February 2020 to February 2022. Patients were subjected to complete history taking, and clinical examinations including general and local examinations and laboratory investigations (complete blood count to assess eosinophilic count, arterial blood gases, and plasma periostin) and spirometry were done for all patients pre- and post-treatment. All patients received 3 months of treatment with a fixed dose of combined inhalers of ICS and LABA, and then they were classified into FEV1 responder and FEV1 non-responder according to improvement in FEV1 at least 12% and 200 mL from baseline of 3 months of combined treatment with ICS/LABA.ResultsBlood eosinophil count had a significant positive correlation with smoking index (pack/year), negative correlations with FEV1% of predicted, FEV1 actual value (L), and FEV1/FVC ratio. Plasma periostin concentration had significant positive correlation with blood eosinophil count, COPD grade, and FVC actual value (L) and significant negative correlations with FEV1% of predicted, FEV1 actual value (L), and FEV1/FVC. Cutoff values of blood eosinophil count > 265 cell/µL, plasma periostin concentration > 15.747 ng/mL, and FEV1% < 40.5% were associated with posttreatment FEV1 response.ConclusionsCOPD patients with poor lung functions regarding FEV1/FVC ratio, FEV1 actual value (L), and FEV1% of predicted as well as high blood eosinophil count and high plasma periostin concentration are predicted to have FEV1 response with fixed-dose ICS/LABA combination treatment.

Single-inhaler triple versus LABA-ICS therapy for COPD: Comparative safety in real-world clinical practice

Recent treatment guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have replaced the long-acting beta2-agonist and inhaled corticosteroid (LABA-ICS) combination with single-inhaler triple therapy that adds a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA-LABA-ICS). Yet, the corresponding trials reported numerically higher incidences of cardiovascular adverse events with triple therapy compared with LABA-ICS. Does single-inhaler triple therapy increase the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events, compared with LABA-ICS, in a real-world clinical practice setting? We identified a cohort of COPD patients, 40 years or older, treated during 2017-2021, from the United Kingdom's Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Among LAMA-naïve patients, initiators of single-inhaler triple therapy were matched 1:1 to LABA-ICS users on time-conditional propensity scores. They were compared on the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as hospitalization for myocardial infarction or stroke, or all-cause-mortality, over one year. The cohort included 10,255 initiators of triple therapy and 10,255 matched users of LABA-ICS. The incidence rate of MACE was 11.3 per 100 per year with triple therapy compared with 8.7 per 100 per year for LABA-ICS. The corresponding adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of MACE with triple therapy was 1.28 (95% CI: 1.05-1.55), relative to LABA-ICS, though the increase was mainly in the first four months (HR 1.41; 95%CI: 1.14-1.74). The HR of all-cause death was 1.31 (95% CI: 1.06-1.62), while for acute myocardial infarction and stroke hospitalization it was 1.00 (95% CI: 0.56-1.79) and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.48-2.36), respectively, with triple therapy, relative to LABA-ICS. In a real-world setting of COPD treatment, patients who initiated single-inhaler triple therapy had an increased incidence of MACE compared with similar patients treated with a LABA-ICS inhaler. This small increase was due to the all-cause mortality component, occurring mainly in the first four months after treatment initiation.

Bronchial asthma with normal forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) compared with low FEV1.

Cough variant asthma (CVA) is characterized by cough as a sole symptom and normal pulmonary function. However, it is unclear whether CVA really common among asthmatic patients with normal forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of cough alone symptom among the subjects with normal FEV1 and to evaluate their differences from ordinary asthmatic subjects. We defined normal FEV1 as ≥90% predicted based on the article of Kotti GH. Of the patients with normal FEV1, we chose subjects without wheeze, and the duration of cough was not to ask, since the symptoms often occurred with acute exacerbation and timing of visiting a doctor depended on each patient's perception. Test for airway hyperresponsiveness was not performed in this study. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for cough and dyspnea, FEV1, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) responsiveness to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta2 agonist (LABA) treatment were compared in patients with normal FEV1 and with low FEV1 <90%. Correlations of changes in symptoms with changes of FEV1, FeNO, peripheral eosinophil count, and serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) at single time point were also examined in each group and in overall patients. The participants were 329 physician-diagnosed treatment-naive patients with asthma who were divided into 187 in normal FEV1 and 142 in low FEV1 groups. Cough without dyspnea was present in 16 patients (8.6%) in the normal FEV1 group, suggesting candidates for CVA in this analysis were quite few. Improvement in symptoms after treatment was similar between both groups. But VAS scores of dyspnea were still higher in the low FEV1 group. The degree of improvement in FEV1 after ICS/LABA treatment was less in the normal FEV1 group than in the low FEV1 group, but was still evident. Peripheral eosinophil count, serum IgE, and FeNO values before treatment were lower in the normal FEV1 group. In overall patients, improvements of symptoms after treatment were significantly correlated with FEV1 changes. Improvement of dyspnea was also significantly related to peripheral eosinophil count and change of FeNO, whereas improvement of cough was not related to these T helper 2 (Th2) response markers. Candidates for CVA among the patients with asthma with predicted FEV1 ≥90% were few. Participants with normal FEV1 respond well to ICS/LABA treatment for improvement of symptom. The change of FEV1 after treatment, and the pre-treatment blood eosinophil count, serum IgE, and FeNO were lower in normal FEV1 cases than in low FEV1 cases. These observations suggest asthmatic patients with normal FEV1, including candidates for CVA having just common mild asthma. In overall participants, symptoms of cough and dyspnea were similar, but were not identical in relation to the Th2 background.

Breathing for Two: Asthma Management, Treatment, and Safety of Pharmacological Therapy during Pregnancy.

The primary objectives of asthma management during pregnancy are to achieve adequate symptom control, reduce the risk of acute exacerbations, and maintain normal pulmonary function, all of which contribute to ensuring the health and well-being of both the mother and the baby. The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) recommends that pregnant women with asthma continue using asthma medications throughout pregnancy, as the benefits of well-controlled asthma for both the mother and fetus outweigh the potential risks of medication side effects, poorly controlled asthma, and exacerbations. The classification of asthma medications by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) into categories A, B, C, D, and X is no longer applied. Instead, the potential benefits and risks of each medication during pregnancy and lactation are considered individually. The use of medications to achieve good asthma control and prevent exacerbations during pregnancy is justified, encompassing inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), some leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), short-acting beta-2 agonists (SABA), long-acting beta-2 agonists (LABA), short-acting muscarinic antagonists (SAMA), long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA), and, recently, biological therapies, even in the absence of definitive safety data during pregnancy.

Elevated Fracture Risks in Patients Using Inhaled Corticosteroids: A Korean Nationwide Study.

In this comprehensive retrospective nationwide cohort study, we examined the relationships between various asthma medications and bone health, utilizing data from the National Health Insurance Service database of South Korea. From 2015 to 2019, the relevant dataset included 168,611 individuals aged 66 years, among whom 8,747 were diagnosed with asthma. We focused on a subset of 6,173 patients, all 66-year-old women. Participants were categorized into four groups: nonusers of asthma medication (n=2,868), leukotriene antagonist users (n=2,281), inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) users (n=517), and those using a combination of ICS and long-acting beta-agonist (ICS+LABA) medication (n=507). The primary outcomes measured were the incidences of major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures during the follow-up period. Over 2.7 years of follow-up, 615 cases of major osteoporotic fractures and 96 cases of hip fractures were recorded. ICS users exhibited a heightened risk of both injuries, with hazard ratios of 1.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 1.63; P<0.001) for major osteoporotic fractures and 1.56 (95% CI, 1.33 to 1.83; P<0.001) for hip fractures. Similarly elevated risks were observed in the ICS+LABA group. Notably, the risk associated with ICS was particularly pronounced among patients with osteopenia for both fracture types. Overall, the use of ICS, alone or in combination with LABA, in patients with asthma is associated with significantly increased risks of osteoporotic fractures, especially among those with osteopenia. These findings underscore the importance of considering bone health when managing asthma, especially in older patients and those with existing bone density issues.

DElaying disease Progression In COPD with early escalation to Triple therapy – A Modelling Study (DEPICT-2)

IntroductionIn patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dual bronchodilator (long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA)) and triple therapy (inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/LAMA/LABA) reduce risk of exacerbations and lung function decline in short-mid-term, but their long-term impact is unknown. This modelling study explores long-term impact of these therapies on lung function decline, quality of life (QoL) and all-cause mortality.MethodsThis modelling approach used a longitudinal non-parametric superposition model using published data regarding exacerbations, QoL (assessed by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)), and mortality. The model simulated disease progression from 40 to 75 years of age and assessed the impact of initiating dual bronchodilator at age 45 years (“LAMA/LABA only” group) and escalation to triple therapy at age 50 years (“Escalation to triple” group) on forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) decline, QoL, and mortality.ResultsModel simulation predicted that by 75 years of age: “LAMA/LABA only” preserves 159.1 mL of FEV1versusno treatment, “Escalation to triple” preserves an additional 376.5 mL and 217.3 mL of FEV1versusno pharmacotherapy and “LAMA/LABA only”, respectively. In “LAMA/LABA only”, SGRQ score reduces (−3.2)versusno treatment, which further reduces to −7.5 therapy in “Escalation to triple”. In “LAMA/LABA only”, mortality reduces by 5.4% by 75 yearsversusno treatment, while the “Escalation to triple” shows further decrease in mortality by 12.0%.ConclusionEarly pharmacotherapy initiation and escalation from dual bronchodilator to triple therapy could slow disease progression by preserving lung function and improving QoL and survival in patients with COPD.

For people with uncontrolled asthma, how does adding long-acting beta2 agonists (LABA) or long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) to different doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or doubling the dose of ICS compare with medium-dose ICS?

For people with uncontrolled asthma, how does adding long-acting beta2 agonists (LABA) or long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) to different doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or doubling the dose of ICS compare with medium-dose ICS?

Treatment patterns in patients with newly diagnosed COPD in the USA

BackgroundPrompt and effective management with maintenance therapy (single or dual bronchodilator therapy) is recommended after the initial diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to maintain lung function and prevent exacerbations. Contrary to guideline-based recommendations, most patients are not prescribed maintenance treatment at initial diagnosis. The current study assessed the pharmacologic treatment patterns and outcomes of newly diagnosed patients with COPD in the USA.MethodsThis retrospective, noninterventional study used de-identified data from the Inovalon Insights’ database (Commercial, Medicaid Managed Care, and Medicare Advantage–insured individuals) between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021. The “patient journey” from initial diagnosis was followed over a 4-year period. The primary outcome measure was the number of moderate or severe exacerbations. Secondary outcome measures included the cumulative incidence of exacerbations, mean cumulative count of moderate and severe exacerbations, rates of moderate and severe exacerbations in patients who remained untreated after diagnosis in 12-month time periods for 4 years, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, and pharmacologic treatment patterns.ResultsThe cohort consisted of 238,158 newly diagnosed patients with COPD (female [52.9%]; mean age 63.8 years). The majority of patients with COPD had Medicaid as their primary insurance (46.2%). Overall, during the 4-year follow-up period, 32.9% of the patients had at least one moderate or severe exacerbation, and 25.8% and 13.8% experienced moderate and severe exacerbations, respectively. At diagnosis, 86.2% of the patients were untreated and most remained untreated by the end of the follow-up (63.8%). Most patients (62.0%) received long-acting beta-agonist (LABA)/inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as their initial treatment at diagnosis, and LABA/ICS continued to be the most common initial treatment during the 4-year period (64.0% at year 1; 58.0% at year 4).ConclusionsMost patients with COPD were not treated at initial diagnosis and remained untreated during follow-up. Our data highlight a lack of adherence to recommendations for clinical practice.

Retrospective, observational study of different medication regimens and outcome in children with cough variant asthma.

This retrospective longitudinal cohort study aimed to explore the best therapeutic regimen and treatment duration of cough variant asthma (CVA) in children. A total of 314 children with CVA were divided into receive inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) combined with long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) group, ICS combined with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) group, ICS monotherapy group and LTRA monotherapy group. All clinical data were statistically analyzed. Logistic regression model was used to compare the advantages and disadvantages of different treatment schemes at each follow-up time point and the best treatment scheme. The Cox proportional hazard regression model based on inverse probability weighting was used to compare the effects of different medication regimens on adverse outcomes with asthma recurrence or progression as the end point. (1) After comprehensive analysis, ICS + LABA group was the preferred control regimen for CVA within 8 weeks. After 8 weeks of diagnosis, the efficacy of ICS group or LTRA group was comparable to that of ICS + LABA group and ICS + LTRA group. (2) The ICS + LABA group showed a significant improvement in cough at an early stage, particularly at 4 weeks; the symptoms of ICS + LTRA and ICS groups were significantly improved at 36 weeks. The LTRA group alone showed significant improvement at 20 weeks. ICS + LABA, ICS + LTRA, ICS alone and LTRA alone can effectively treat CVA. ICS + LABA could improve the symptoms most quickly within 8 weeks after CVA diagnosis, followed by ICS + LATR group. After 8 weeks, it can be reduced to ICS alone to control CVA for at least 36 weeks based on the remission of symptoms in children.

Thoughtful prescription of inhaled medication has the potential to reduce inhaler-related greenhouse gas emissions by 85%

IntroductionBoth physicians and patients are increasingly aware of the environmental impacts of medication. The shift of treatment paradigm towards MART-treatment (Maintenance and Reliever Therapy) in asthma affects the treatment-related emissions....

New pharmacological therapies for the treatment of copd: a review of long-acting muscarinic agonists and long-acting beta-agonists

New pharmacological therapies for the treatment of copd: a review of long-acting muscarinic agonists and long-acting beta-agonists

Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and Asthma Exacerbations: Which Patients Benefit Most?

While recent evidence suggested glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA) may reduce the risk of asthma exacerbations, it remains unclear which subpopulations might derive the most benefit from GLP1RA treatment. To identify characteristics of patients with asthma that predict who might benefit the most from GLP1RA treatment using real-world data. We implemented an active-comparator, new-user design analysis using commercially insured patients ages 18-65 from Marketscan data 2007-2019 and identified two cohorts: GLP1RA vs thiazolidinediones and GLP1RA vs sulfonylureas. The outcome was acute exacerbation of asthma (hospital admission or emergency department (ED) visit for asthma) within 180 days after initiation. We applied iterative causal forest (iCF), a novel causal machine learning subgrouping algorithm, to assess HTE. In identified subgroups, we predicted propensity score, conducted propensity score trimming, and then estimated adjusted risk differences (aRD) for the effect of GLP1RA relative to comparators on asthma exacerbation using inverse probability treatment weighting in propensity score trimmed subpopulation. Among 10,989 patients initiating GLP1RA or thiazolidinediones and 17,088 patients initiating GLP1RA vs sulfonylurea, GLP1RA initiators had fewer exacerbations with an aRD of -0.5% (95% CI -1.1% to 0.1%) and -1.6% (95% CI -2.2% to -1.1%), respectively. In the GLP1RAvsSUcohort where we observed beneficial effect, our iCF analysis identified 5 subgroups with different treatment effects, defined by number of ED visits, number of prescriptions of short-acting beta2-agonsit (SABA), number of prescriptions of inhaled steroid (ICS) and long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) (either combination therapy or concurrent use), and aged 50+. Among these, patients with 2+ ED visits during 12-month baseline period had the largest absolute exacerbation risk reduction, with a decrease of 2.8% for GLP1RA (95% CI: -4.8% to -0.9%). GLP1RA demonstrated beneficial effect on reducing asthma exacerbation relative to sulfonylureas. Asthma patients with 2+ ED visits (a proxy for disease severity) benefit most from GLP1RA. ED visit frequency, and number of maintenance and reliever inhalers, and age may help individualize prediction of the short-term benefit from GLP1RA on asthma exacerbation.

Advances in inhaler therapy for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a comprehensive review of Fostair™ and Trimbow™.

The management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) poses considerable challenges due to the intricate nature of these respiratory conditions. Fostair™ and Trimbow™, two pressurized metered dose inhalers, have emerged as noteworthy therapeutic options for treating both asthma and COPD. Fostair combines an inhaled corticosteroid, specifically beclometasone dipropionate, with a long-acting beta2-agonist, formoterol fumarate dihydrate, offering a dual-action approach to mitigate airway inflammation and bronchoconstriction. Conversely, Trimbow integrates a tri-particulate formulation consisting of beclometasone dipropionate, formoterol fumarate dihydrate, and glycopyrronium bromide, providing a comprehensive strategy to target the pathophysiology of COPD and asthma. Recent clinical trials have underscored Trimbow's superior efficacy compared with Fostair, particularly in terms of reducing exacerbation rates and enhancing lung function. However, despite their therapeutic promise, both inhalers encounter challenges, including limited generalizability of study findings and a disparity between in vitro and human trial results. This literature review offers an in-depth analysis of Fostair and Trimbow, delving into their mechanisms of action, clinical applications, and outcomes in human studies for asthma and COPD. Additionally, the review discusses the role of combination therapy in managing respiratory diseases and underscores the necessity for further research to address existing knowledge gaps and optimize therapeutic outcomes.