Locoregional Failure-free Survival Research Articles

Explore the Value of Adding Induction Chemotherapy to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in T3-4N0M0 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: A Retrospective Study.

PurposePatients with T3-4N0M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) are a unique subgroup of locoregional advanced NPC, which generally have a better prognosis than others and are often excluded in most randomized controlled clinical trials focusing on locoregional advanced NPC. The management of this population is still controversial. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of T3-4N0M0 NPC patients treated with sequential induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC+CCRT) or chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone.Patients and MethodsWe included 362 patients diagnosed with T3-4N0M0 NPC from two hospitals between December 2005 and December 2014. All patients were received IC + CCRT (n=146) or CCRT (n=216). Locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were retrospectively estimated.ResultsThe median follow-up was 95 (range: 11–168) months. Univariable analyses have shown that 5-year LRFFS, DFS and OS in the IC+CCRT group and the CCRT group were 87.4% vs 93.4% (P = 0.035), 80.4% vs 87.0% (P = 0.047) and 86.3% vs 93.0% (P = 0.040). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that only the T stage was the independent prognostic factor for LRFFS, DFS, and OS in the entire group analysis. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with T3 tumors who received IC+CCRT had significantly lower LRFFS, DFS, and OS than those treated with CCRT. For T4 patients, the outcomes had no significant difference between the two groups.ConclusionThis retrospective study showed that T3N0M0 patients who received CCRT had better prognosis than those treated with IC+CCRT. In terms of T4N0M0 disease, treatment outcomes are similar in both treatment groups. However, these results require further confirmation of large sample size, prospectively, randomized controlled trials.

Mid-treatment Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Human Papillomavirus-related Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Primary Radiotherapy: Nodal Metabolic Response Rate can Predict Treatment Outcomes

AimsTo evaluate whether biomarkers derived from fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (FDG PET-CT) performed prior to (prePET) and during the third week (interim PET; iPET) of radiotherapy can predict treatment outcomes in human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPC). Materials and methodsThis retrospective analysis included 46 patients with newly diagnosed OPC treated with definitive (chemo)radiation and all patients had confirmed positive HPV status (HPV+OPC) based on p16 immunohistochemistry. The maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesional glycolysis (TLG) of primary, index node (node with the highest TLG) and total lymph nodes and their median percentage (≥50%) reductions in iPET were analysed, and correlated with 5-year Kaplan–Meier and multivariable analyses (smoking, T4, N2b-3 and AJCC stage IV), including local failure-free survival, regional failure-free survival, locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), distant metastatic failure-free survival (DMFFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival. ResultsThere was no association of outcomes with prePET parameters observed on multivariate analysis. A complete metabolic response of primary tumour was seen in 13 patients; the negative predictive value for local failure was 100%. More than a 50% reduction in total nodal MTV provided the best predictor of outcomes, including LRFFS (88% versus 47.1%, P = 0.006, hazard ratio = 0.153) and DFS (78.2% versus 41.2%, P = 0.01, hazard ratio = 0.234). More than a 50% reduction in index node TLG was inversely related to DMFFS: a better nodal response was associated with a higher incidence of distant metastatic failure (66.7% versus 100%, P = 0.009, hazard ratio = 3.0). ConclusionThe reduction (≥50%) of volumetric nodal metabolic burden can potentially identify a subgroup of HPV+OPC patients at low risk of locoregional failure but inversely at higher risk of distant metastatic failure and may have a role in individualised adaptive radiotherapy and systemic therapy.

The safety and efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP)-based induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

To assess the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP)-based induction chemotherapy (IC) plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). We systematically searched the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant failure-free survival (DMFS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS) and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). A total of seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. When GP-based IC was compared with double-drug-based or triple-drug-based IC, there were no significant differences in OS (HR 0.64, P = 0.08), PFS (HR 0.71, P = 0.09), DMFS (HR 0.87, P = 0.49) or LRFFS (HR 0.88, P = 0.66). Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed that GP IC led to an improvement in OS compared with triple-drug-based IC (P < 0.0001). Regarding safety, compared to triple-drug-based IC, GP-based IC was related to a decreased risk of leucopenia (P = 0.007) and neutropenia (P = 0.02) but was associated with an increased risk of thrombocytopenia (P = 0.01). Compared to double-drug-based IC, the prevalence of grade 3 or above thrombocytopenia was higher in the GP group (P = 0.007). No significant difference in the incidence of other AEs was observed. Based on efficacy and safety, our meta-analysis demonstrated that, compared to double-drug-based or triple-drug-based IC, IC with a GP regimen does not appear to improve OS, PFS, DMFS or LRFFS and mainly led to an increased risk of grade3/4 thrombocytopenia. Notably, our subgroup analysis data show that GP-based IC may bring improved trends in OS as compared to triple-drug-based IC. For the optimal IC regimen has not been established, which IC regimen will benefit most LA-NPC patients should be further explored.

The Treatment Outcomes of Olfactory Neuroblastoma Patients With Frontal Lobe Invasion.

BackgroundTo investigate whether frontal lobe invasion (FLI) was an unfavorable prognostic factor in patients with olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB), and to explore the optimal treatment strategy for ONB patients with FLI.MethodsSome 37 patients with FLI were retrospectively studied, and 74 well-matched patients without FLI were enrolled as the control group. The long-term survivals were compared between the two groups.ResultsNo significant differences were found between the two groups in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (all p >0.05). Multivariate analyses showed that FLI wasn’t an independent predictor for OS (HR = 1.100, 95% CI = 0.437–2.772, p = 0.840). Among the 37 patients with FLI, patients who received surgery combined with chemo-/radiotherapy showed better OS (89.4% vs. 53.6%, p = 0.001) and PFS (87.8% vs. 53.6%, p = 0.001) compared with those who didn’t undergo surgery.ConclusionsFLI wasn’t a poor prognostic factor for ONB patients. Endoscopic resection combined with radiotherapy was an effective therapeutic method for ONB patients with FLI.

Retropharyngeal lymph node-sparing radiotherapy in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma

PurposeIn radiotherapy for head and neck cancer, it is crucial to define the appropriate treatment volume to determine treatment outcome and toxicity. We examined the feasibility of omitting elective high retropharyngeal lymph node (RPLN) irradiation in patients with oropharyngeal cancer.Materials and MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of 189 patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with definitive or postoperative radiation therapy between 2009 and 2016. Of them, 144 (76.2%) underwent ipsilateral RPLN irradiation up to the superior border of the C1 vertebral body, while the other 45 (23.8%) were irradiated up to the transverse process of the C1 vertebra. High RPLN-treated and spared group were propensity matched based on key clinical variables.ResultsDuring the follow-up period, only three patients (one in the high RPLN-treated group and two in the high RPLN-spared group) developed RPLN recurrence. There were no significant between-group differences in 5-year locoregional failure-free survival (82.8% vs. 90.6%; p = 0.14), distant metastasis-free survival (93.1% vs. 93.3%; p = 0.98) and RPLN failure-free survival (99.3% vs. 95.0%; p = 0.09). In the matched groups, high RPLN-spared patients received a lower mean ipsilateral parotid gland dose (mean, 20.8 Gy vs. 29.9 Gy; p < 0.001) and had a lower incidence of chronic xerostomia (grade 0, 43.5% vs. 13.0%; p = 0.023) at 1 year after radiotherapy compared with high RPLN-treated patients.ConclusionOmission of ipsilateral high RPLN irradiation seems safe, and reduces the incidence of chronic xerostomia in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Association of tumor downstaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with survival in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Assessing the downstaging effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) and predicting response to treatment remain challenging. The present study aimed to evaluate the long-term prognosis of downstaging after NACT in patients with LANPC and to investigate the prognostic value of post-NACT tumor downstaging on treatment outcomes in the era of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). This retrospective study included 226 patients with stage III (n = 188) and IVA (n = 38) NPC admitted to Haikou People's Hospital between 1 October 2009 and 1 October 2012. The patients were grouped as downstaging or no after NACT. Overall survival (OS), locoregional failure-free survival (LFFS), and distant failure-free survival (DFFS) were analyzed. Among 226 patients, 196 (86.7%) were in the downstaging group and 30 (13.3%) were in the non-downstaging group. The longest follow-up was 76months, and the median was 45months. The 3-year OS rates of the downstaging group and non-downstaging group were 91.0% (95% CI 0.89-0.93) and 69.5% (95% CI 0.66-0.72) (P = 0.005). The 5-year OS rates were 81.6% (95% CI 0.78-0.86) and 53.3% (95% CI 0.49-0.61) (P = 0.001). N downstaging (3-year OS, HR 0.491, 95% CI 0.221-0.881, P = 0.022; 5-year OS, HR = 0.597, 95% CI 0.378-0.878, P = 0.021) was independently associated with OS. In the treatment of LANPC, the patients with downstaging after NACT have a better prognosis than those without downstaging. This study suggests that NACT can improve the prognosis for patients with LANPC if there is downstaging.

Toxicity Profiles and Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Nonmetastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy vs Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy

Patients with nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) are primarily treated by radiotherapy with curative intent with or without chemotherapy and often experience substantial treatment-related toxic effects even with modern radiation techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) may improve the toxicity profile; however, there is a paucity of data given the limited availability of IMPT in regions with endemic NPC. To compare toxic effects and oncologic outcomes among patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic NPC when treated with IMPT vs IMRT with or without chemotherapy. This retrospective cohort study included 77 patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic NPC who received curative-intent radiotherapy with IMPT or IMRT at a tertiary academic cancer center from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. Forty-eight patients with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive tumors were included in a 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis for survival outcomes. The end of the follow-up period was March 31, 2021. IMPT vs IMRT with or without chemotherapy. The main outcomes were the incidence of acute and chronic treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and oncologic outcomes, including locoregional failure-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). We identified 77 patients (25 [32.5%] women; 52 [67.5%] men; median [interquartile range] age, 48.7 [42.2-60.3] years), among whom 28 (36.4%) were treated with IMPT and 49 (63.6%) were treated with IMRT. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 30.3 (17.9-41.5) months. On multivariable logistic regression analyses, IMPT was associated with lower likelihood of developing grade 2 or higher acute AEs compared with IMRT (odds ratio [OR], 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03-0.60; P = .01). Only 1 case (3.8%) of a chronic grade 3 or higher AE occurred in the IMPT group compared with 8 cases (16.3%) in the IMRT group (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.01-1.21; P = .15). Propensity score matching generated a balanced cohort of 48 patients (24 IMPT vs 24 IMRT) and found similar PFS in the IMPT and IMRT groups (2-year PFS, 95.7% [95% CI, 87.7%-100%] vs 76.7% [95% CI, 60.7%-97.0%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.07-1.47; P = .14). No locoregional recurrence or death was observed in the IMPT group from the matched cohort. Two-year LRFS was 100% (95% CI, 100%-100%) in the IMPT group and 86.2% (95% CI, 72.8%-100%) in the IMRT group (P = .08). Three-year OS was 100% (95% CI, 100%-100%) in the IMPT group and 94.1% (95% CI, 83.6%-100%) in the IMRT group (P = .42). Smoking history was the only clinical factor significantly associated with both poor LRFS (HR, 63.37; 95% CI, 3.25-1236.13; P = .006) and poor PFS (HR, 6.33; 95% CI, 1.16-34.57; P = .03) on multivariable analyses. In this study, curative-intent radiotherapy with IMPT for nonmetastatic NPC was associated with significantly reduced acute toxicity burden in comparison with IMRT, with rare late complications and excellent oncologic outcomes, including 100% locoregional control at 2 years. Prospective trials are warranted to direct the optimal patient selection for IMPT as the primary radiotherapy modality for nonmetastatic NPC.

Survival benefit of induction chemotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: prognosis based on a new risk estimation model

BackgroundAlthough the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines recommend CCRT+AC and IC + CCRT as level 2A evidence for treatment of the locoregionally advanced NPC (II-IVa), IC + CCRT+AC could also be an alternative but it is seldom used because of the low completion rates. This article aimed to compare the effectiveness of the three radiotherapy regimens using a large-scale retrospective study.MethodsThis retrospective single center analysis enrolled 1812 diagnosed NPC patients at Nanfang Hospital from January 2005 to December 2015 and only 729 patients met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Patients without distant metastasis, age of 18–70 years, Karnofsky scores of at least 70,stage III-IVb, and adequate adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function. Were enrolled. Adverse events and other categorical variables were compared by Pearson chi-square test or Fishier exact test. Time-to-event data were described with the Kaplan-Meier curves, time-to-event intervals compared with the log-rank test. We did multivariable analyses with the Cox proportional hazards model to test the independent signifi cance of diff erent factors. Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the β regression coeffi cient, p value, and hazard ratio and its 95% CI for each of the selected risk predictors.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 47 months. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed no significant differences among three groups in 3-year failure-free survival (FFS, P = 0.225), 3-year overall survival (OS, P = 0.992), 3-year locoregional failure-free survival (LFFS, P = 0.549), and 3-year distant failure-free survival (DFFS, P = 0.174). Stratified survival analysis based on the risk scoring model revealed no differences in FFS, OS, LFFS, and DFFS between IC + CCRT and CCRT+AC groups for low-risk patients, however, the 3-year OS (88.3% vs. 77.6%, P = 0.049) and 3-year DFFS (84.0% vs.66.8%, P = 0.032) were respectively significantly better in IC + CCRT group compared with CCRT+AC group for high-risk patients.ConclusionsCompared with CCRT+AC, IC + CCRT lowers distant metastasis rate and improves OS among patients with locally advanced NPC in high risk group.

Chemoradiotherapy and Increased Prescription Dose in Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Retrospective Study.

To analyze the outcomes and adverse events of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with definitive chemoradiation with modified radiotherapy volume and increased radiation dose. This was a retrospective analysis of patients with ESCC treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (02/2015 to 02/2017). The dose to the planning gross tumor volume (PGTV) and planning clinical tumor volume (PTV1) was 66-68 Gy (2.0-2.2 Gy/fraction). The dose to the planning regional lymph node drainage area volume (PTV2) was 46 Gy (2.0 Gy/fraction). Treatment response, adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS) were analyzed. Twenty-six patients were included. The median follow-up was 31 (range, 4.3-51.3) months. Sixteen (61.5%) patients had a complete response, and four (15.4%) achieved a partial response. The objective response rate was 76.9%, and the disease control rate was 80.8%. The median PFS and OS were not achieved. The 4-year PFS was 63.9%, and the 4-year OS was 71.0%. Grade 1-2 and 3-4 radiation-related esophagitis was observed in 15 (57.7%) and one (4.5%) patients, respectively. Grade 1-2 and 3-4 radiation-related pneumonitis was observed in 12 (46.2%) and one (4.5%) patients, respectively. No patients developed radiation-related heart or skin damage. The modified target volume definition and increased dose of definitive radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with ESCC had low toxicity and might improve survival, but additional trials are necessary to prove the superiority of this strategy.

Clinical Outcome of Salvage Radiotherapy for Locoregional Clinical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.

Objectives: To assess the clinical outcomes of prostate cancer patients treated with salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for locoregional clinical recurrence (CR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: Records of 60 patients with macroscopic locoregional recurrence after prostatectomy and referrals for SRT were retrospectively investigated in the multi-institutional database. The median radiation dose was 70.2 Gy. Biochemical failure was defined as the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥ nadir + 2 or initiation of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for increased PSA. Results: Median recurrent tumor size was 1.1 cm and pre-radiotherapy PSA level was 0.4 ng/ml. At a median follow-up of 83.1-month after SRT, 7-year biochemical failure-free survival (BCFFS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were 67.0%, 89.7%, 83.6%, and 91.2%, respectively. Higher Gleason's scores were associated with unfavorable BCFFS, DMFS, and OS. Pre-SRT PSA ≥0.5 ng/ml predicted worse BCFFS, LRFFS, and DMFS. In multivariate analyses, a Gleason's score of 8 to 10 was associated with decreased BCFFS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-8.74, P = .031) and OS (HR 17.72, 95% CI 1.75-179.64, P = .015), and combined ADT decreased the risks of distant metastasis (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.92, P = .039). Two patients (3.3%) experienced late grade 3 urinary toxicity. Conclusions: SRT for locoregional CR after RP achieved favorable outcomes with acceptable long-term toxicities. Higher Gleason's scores and pre-radiotherapy PSA level were unfavorable prognostic variables. Combined ADT may decrease the risks of metastases.

Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma: Experience of a Tertiary Cancer Center in the Middle East.

Background:Metaplastic breast cancer (MetBC) represents a therapeutic challenge. We evaluated the impact of clinicopathological characteristics and treatment modalities on outcomes among MetBC patients treated at our center.Methods:Women with stage I-III MetBC were reviewed from our database from 2005-2018. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate locoregional-failure-free survival (LRFFS), overall-survival (OS) and distant-metastases-free survival (DMFS). We assessed associations with survival outcomes by log-rank tests. Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models were used to identify independent predictors of LRFFS, OS and DMFS.Results:81 patients were eligible for the study. Median age at diagnosis was 48 years. 90.1% had G-III tumors, 64.2% were pathologically node negative and lympho-vascular invasion (LVI) was absent in 72.8%. 67.8% were triple negative, and 7.4% were HER2-neu positive. Most (66.7%) patients underwent mastectomy. Free margins were achieved in the entire cohort, however, 17.3% had close margin (<2 mm). Almost all patients received chemotherapy. 75.3% received radiotherapy, 23.5% received hormonal therapy and 6.2% received Trastuzumab. With a median follow-up of 54 months, 18.5% developed loco-regional recurrence and 34.6% relapsed distally. Five-year OS was 66.0%. On multivariate analysis: adjuvant radiotherapy correlated with better OS (P < .0001), and tumor size >5 cm, nodal involvement and LVI correlated with worse OS, (P = .019, P = .021, P = .028, respectively). There were no survival differences with respect to age, triple negativity, and morphologic subtype.Conclusion:We report the largest single institutional series on MetBC in the Middle East region. MetBC confers worse survival outcomes, and more aggressive local and systemic treatment strategies should be investigated.

Induction Chemotherapy Docetaxel, Cisplatin, 5-Fluorouracil Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Stage IVA Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Objectives: Two phase III studies using docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) have reported survival benefit compared to CCRT. However, TPF was used at 80% of the conventional dose in the Chinese study due to the concern of tolerability. We aim to explore the tolerability of TPF using standard dose in Chinese patients with stage IVA (AJCC 8th edition) nasopharyngeal carcinoma and report on its preliminary efficacy. Methods: Consecutive patients treated with induction chemotherapy (IC) TPF followed by CCRT between 2017 and 2020 were reviewed. TPF regimen consisted of three cycles of Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 D1; Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 D1; 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 D1-5 every 3 weeks; with G-CSF D7-11. Radiotherapy consisted of 70 Gy in 35 fractions with concomitant cisplatin 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Results: 28 patients were identified. 92.8% patients completed three cycles of IC. 79% patients received concomitant cisplatin of ≥ 200 mg/m2 . The most common grade 3 or 4 acute toxicity was diarrhea (25%). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 10.7% of patients, of which only 3.6% resulted in febrile neutropenia. Median follow-up was 2 years. The 2-year overall survival, locoregional failure-free survival and distant failure-free survival were 100%, 96.4% and 91.3% respectively. Conclusion: IC using standard dose TPF was well tolerated in Chinese patients with manageable toxicities and allowed adequate delivery of subsequent concurrent cisplatin. Survival outcomes were encouraging and unnecessary dose reduction of TPF should be avoided.

The prognostic role of prognostic nutritional index in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The prognostic utility of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has never been systematically reviewed. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis. We performed comprehensive research via Embase, PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were applied to explore the relationship between PNI and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and clinical features. Both univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA) were used. A total of 8 eligible studies including 3631 patients were ultimately enrolled. A low PNI level was significantly associated with a shorter OS [(HR 2.06, P < 0.00001; UVA) and (HR 1.78, P < 0.00001; MVA)], PFS [(HR 2.27, P = 0.006; UVA) and (HR 1.45, P = 0.0003; MVA)] and DMFS [(HR 2.06, P < 0.00001; UVA) and (HR 2.04, P < 0.00001; MVA)]. However, only one study reported the LRFFS of NPC patients, and there was no significant difference [HR 1.68, P = 0.26]. Furthermore, female patients, higher tumor stage, a lower alanine transaminase (ALT) level and a lower white blood cell (WBC) level were associated with a lower PNI level. Our meta-analysis indicated that NPC patients with a low PNI level had worse OS, PFS and DMFS, and a low PNI level was associated with female patients, higher tumor stage, a lower ALT level and a lower WBC level. These findings indicate that PNI is a promising prognostic biomarker.

Pattern of failure and optimal treatment strategy for primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy.

PurposeThe optimal treatment for primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PG-DLBCL) is still unknown. We evaluated unfavorable prognostic factors and pattern of failure in PG-DLBCL to determine the optimal treatment strategy.MethodsBetween April 2001 and November 2018, 120 patients with complete remission following rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP) chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. According to the Lugano staging system, 80 patients (66.7%) had localized disease and 40 patients (33.3%) had advanced disease. A total of 93 (77.5%) patients had single gastric lesion and 27 (22.5%) patients had multiple gastric lesions. Ninety patients (75%) were treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy alone and 30 patients (25%) received R-CHOP chemotherapy with additional local treatment for gastric lesions.ResultsThe 5-year locoregional failure-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates in patients treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy with local treatment were 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, whereas the LRFS, PFS, and OS rates in patients treated with R-CHOP chemotherapy alone were 86.3%, 78.2%, and 87.4%, respectively (p = 0.031, p = 0.095, and p = 0.025, respectively). During the follow-up period, 17 patients (14.2%) had disease recurrence. Only 3 of the 17 patients had relapse in a completely new site without relapse in the initial involved site. All, except 2, cases of local recurrence included gastric failure. In the multivariate analysis, performance status and number of gastric lesions were independent prognostic factors for treatment outcome.ConclusionsPatients with complete remission following R-CHOP chemotherapy showed a good prognosis. The main pattern of failure in patients with PG-DLBCL was local recurrence, especially in the stomach. Patients who received local treatment for gastric lesions showed improved gastric control. Therefore, in patients with unfavorable prognostic factors, we recommend R-CHOP chemotherapy with additional local treatment for gastric lesions.

Long-term analysis of multimodality treatment outcomes and prognosis of esthesioneuroblastomas: a single center results of 138 patients

BackgroundThe aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of different treatment strategies and the potential prognostic factors of esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB).Materials and methodsBetween April 1984 and December 2018, 138 patients with non-metastatic ENB were retrospectively analyzed. The treatment modalities mainly included surgery alone (n = 7), radiotherapy alone (n = 33), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (n = 17), surgery combined with current chemoradiotherapy (n = 32), and surgery plus radiotherapy (n = 49).ResultsThe median follow-up time for the entire cohort was 61 months (range, 4–231 months). The 5-year overall survival (OS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rate were 69.6, 78.0 and 73.9%, respectively. Surgery combined with radiotherapy elicited superior survival results, and the combination of surgery and current chemoradiotherapy achieved the best prognoses for all patients, patients with advanced Kadish disease, patients receiving intensity modulated radiation therapy and those with positive surgical margin. Univariate analysis identified orbital invasion and treatment modalities were predictors for OS, LRFFS and DMFS. Lymph node metastasis was associated with OS and DMFS, but not LRFFS. Intracranial invasion, advanced Kadish stage and not receiving concurrent chemotherapy were also predictive of lower OS. Multivariate analyses indicated that lymph node metastasis was an independent prognostic factor affecting DMFS, whereas treatment modalities was independent prognostic factors for OS and LRFFS.ConclusionOrbital invasion, intracranial invasion, lymph node metastasis and advanced Kadish disease at initial diagnosis were significantly associated with inferior prognosis. Regarding the treatment modality, the optimal strategy remined surgery with radiotherapy-based multimodality treatment. The concurrent chemoradiotherapy may play a more beneficial role.

The evolution of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging system over a 10-year period: implications for future revisions.

BackgroundThe classification criteria and staging groups for nasopharyngeal carcinoma described in the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer (UICC/AJCC) staging system have been revised over time. This study assessed the proportion of patients whose staging and treatment strategy have changed due to revisions of the UICC/AJCC staging system over the past 10 years (ie, from the sixth edition to the eighth edition), to provide information for further refinement.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 1901 patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated in our cancer center between November 2009 and June 2012. The Akaike information criterion and Harrell concordance index were applied to evaluate the performance of the staging system.ResultsIn total, 25 (1.3%) of the 1901 patients who were staged as T2a according to the sixth edition system were downgraded to T1 in the eighth edition; 430 (22.6%) staged as N0 in the sixth edition were upgraded to N1 in the eighth edition; 106 (5.6%) staged as N1/2 in the sixth edition were upgraded to N3 in the eighth edition. In addition, 51 (2.7%) and 25 (1.3%) of the study population were upstaged from stage I to stage II and stage II to stage IVa, respectively; 10 (0.5%) was downgraded from stage II to stage I. The survival curves of adjacent N categories and staging groups defined by eighth classification system were well-separated. However, there was no significant difference in the locoregional failure-free survival (P = 0.730) and disease-free survival (P = 0.690) rates between the T2 and T3 categories in the eighth edition classification system.ConclusionsModifications to the tumor-node-metastasis staging system over the past 10 years have resulted in N classification changes in numerous cases. Although the eighth edition tumor-node-metastasis staging system better predicts survival outcomes, the T classification could be simplified in future revisions.

Recurrence patterns after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared with surgery alone in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results from the multicenter phase III trial NEOCRTEC5010

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for developing recurrences in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery or surgery alone from a multicenter phase III trial NEOCRTEC5010. Patients and methodsPatients with locally advanced ESCC were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive neoadjuvant CRT plus surgery (CRT + S group) or surgery alone (S group). CRT consisted of two cycles of vinorelbine and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy of 40.0 Gy in 20 fractions. Recurrence patterns, sites, frequency, and timing and potential prognostic factors were compared. ResultsOf the 451 patients enrolled from 2007 to 2014, 411 patients who underwent resection were analysed. After a median follow-up of 51.9 months, 62 patients (33.7%) in the CRT + S group versus 104 patients (45.8%) in the S group experienced recurrences (P = 0.013). The CRT + S group demonstrated a significantly better locoregional failure-free survival (P = 0.012) and a more favourable distant metastasis-free survival (P = 0.028) than the S group. Recurrences occurred earlier in the S group (P = 0.053), and late relapses were much more frequent in the CRT + S group (P = 0.029). On multivariate analysis, R1 resection and surgery alone were adverse factors for developing locoregional recurrences, whereas R1 resection was the only independent factor associated with distant metastases. ConclusionsThe neoadjuvant CRT regimen was associated with significantly reduced locoregional and distant recurrences compared with surgery alone. Recurrence patterns, sites and frequency were different between groups. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifierNCT01216527.

The declining role of post-treatment neck dissection in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer

Background and purposeHuman papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer (HPV+ OPC) with regional lymph node metastases has a good prognosis following (chemo)radiation therapy (C/RT) but lymph nodes may remain detectable for several months. Delayed [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET) can identify patients who may avoid post-treatment neck dissection (PTND). We investigated the rate of PTND in HPV+ OPC treated with C/RT and delayed PET-directed management of the neck. Materials and methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively updated institutional database. Eligible patients were treated between January 2005 and July 2017 with a minimum of 18 months follow up, had node-positive, non-distant metastatic HPV+ OPC and were treated with RT (70 Gy/35#/5 per week) with concurrent Cisplatin or Cetuximab, or accelerated RT alone (68 Gy/34#/6 per week). The primary endpoint was rate of PTND. Secondary endpoints were locoregional failure free survival (LRFFS), regional failure free survival (RFFS), distant metastatic failure free survival (DMFFS), overall survival (OS) and oropharyngeal cancer-specific survival (CSS). Results418 patients were eligible. Nineteen patients (4.5%) received a PTND. None of the tested variables were associated with an increased risk of PTND. Five-year probabilities for LRFFS, RFFS, DMFS, OS and CSS were, 91.2% (95% CI 88.3–94.2), 93.4% (95% CI 90.8–96.0), 91.2% (95% CI 88.3–94.2), 86.4% (95% CI 83.0–90.1) and 90.2% (95% CI 87.1–93.4), respectively. ConclusionIn a large cohort with good median follow up and protocolized C/RT, delayed PET-directed management of the neck affords a lower rate of PTND than reported in historical series without compromising disease control and survival.

Long-term outcomes of patients in different histological subtypes of primary nasopharyngeal adenocarcinoma: A single-center experience with 71 cases

This study is aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes and management approaches in different histological subtypes of primary nasopharyngeal adenocarcinoma (NPAC). 71 patients with NPAC at our institution between 1984 and 2016 were reviewed, including adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) in 43 patients, mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) in 17 patients, and primary traditional adenocarcinoma (AC) in 11 patients. 37 patients received primary radiotherapy and 34 patients underwent primary surgery. The median time of follow-up was 77months. The 5-year overall survival rate (OS), locoregional failure-free survival rate (LRFFS) and distant metastasis failure-free survival rate (DFFS) were 69.9%, 67.1% and 77.9%, respectively. Patients who received combined modality therapy had better 5-year OS (73.7% vs 66.2%, p=0.065) and LRFFS (73.1% vs 64.5%, p=0.047) than patients receiving single modality therapy. Regarding the different histological subtypes, the survival rates of patients with ACC undergoing primary radiotherapy and primary surgery were similar (5-year OS 82.3% vs 68.8%, LRFFS 70.0% vs 70.8%, p＞0.05). As to patients with MEC and AC, those who underwent primary surgery achieved better 5-year OS (75.6% vs 45.5%, p=0.001) and LRFFS (70.6%% vs 57.1%, p=0.014) than those who received primary radiotherapy. Multivariate analyses indicated that histological subtypes and radiotherapy technique were independent factors for OS. The optimal treatment policy for NPAC remained the combination of radiotherapy and surgery. For patients with ACC, radiotherapy could be considered as the primary treatment. Surgery was suggested to be the primary treatment in patients with MEC and AC.

Survival outcomes of patients with cervical esophageal cancer who received definitive radiotherapy: a retrospective study conducted in a single institution*

Abstract Objective Cervical esophageal cancer (CEC) is a relatively rare condition, with limited treatment options. The current study aimed to assess the survival outcomes of patients with CEC who received definitive radiotherapy. Methods In total, 63 consecutive patients with CEC who received definitive radiotherapy between 2010 and 2018 were included in this study. The survival outcomes were analyzed based on statistics. Results The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the patients were 12 and 19 months, respectively. There were no significant differences in terms of survival outcomes between the groups who received radiation doses ≥ 60 and &lt; 60 Gy. Interestingly, in the proximal CEC subgroup, the PFS (P = 0.039), OS (P = 0.031), and loco-regional failure-free survival (LRFFS) (P = 0.005) improved significantly in patients who received a radiation dose ≥ 60 Gy compared with those who received a radiation dose &lt; 60 Gy. However, in the distal CEC subgroup, the PFS, OS, and LRFFS did not significantly improve between patients who received radiation doses ≥ 60 and &lt; 60 Gy. Definitive radiotherapy was well tolerated, and no significant differences were observed in terms of treatment-related toxicities between the groups who received radiation doses ≥ 60 and &lt; 60 Gy. Conclusion The survival outcomes of patients with CEC should be improved. In proximal CEC, a radiation dose ≥ 60 Gy is significantly correlated with better PFS, OS, and LRFFS. However, further research must be performed to validate this finding.