Locoregional Failure-free Survival Research Articles

Involved-field high-dose chemoradiotherapy with respiratory motion management for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

We investigated the clinical outcomes of involved-field high-dose (≥66 Gy) chemoradiotherapy (CRT) combined with respiratory motion management for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Patients who underwent definitive CRT for histologically confirmed ESCC in our department between 2012 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Respiratory motion management strategies included breath-holding (63%) and mask immobilization (29%) based on individual measurements of respiratory tumor motion using radiographic fluoroscopy with endoscopically placed clip markers as landmarks. We evaluated patient characteristics, treatment efficacy, failure patterns, and toxicities. We enrolled 35 patients with a prescribed dose of 66-70 Gy in 33-35 fractions. The overall response rate within 6 months post-CRT was 94.3%; the median follow-up period for survivors was 43 months. The 2-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, and locoregional failure-free survival rates were 51.4%, 42.9%, and 42.9%, respectively. A significant difference in OS was observed between patients with and without esophageal fistulas after CRT (p = 0.002, log-rank test). Disease failure occurred in 16 patients (45.7%), including one (2.9%) with out-of-field regional nodal failure. Major grade 3 or higher toxicities included decreased white blood cell count (48.6%), neutrophil count (34.3%), and esophageal stenosis (31.4%). No grade 3 or higher cardiopulmonary toxicities were observed. Bronchial/tracheal tumor compression and a higher radiotherapy dose (70 Gy) were significantly correlated with esophageal fistulas. Involved-field high-dose CRT with respiratory motion management may be a feasible treatment option for ESCC. However, a comprehensive assessment of esophageal fistula risk is required to identify suitable candidates.

Induction-concurrent versus concurrent-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with high-risk N2–3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

6072 Background: It remains uncertain which chemotherapy sequence is more effective for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of induction-concurrent with concurrent-adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk N2–3 NPC. Methods: We conducted an open-label, phase 3, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Patients aged 18–65 years with stage T1-4N2-3M0 (AJCC 7th staging system) and pretreatment Epstein–Barr virus DNA level ≥1500 copies/ml were enrolled. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive paclitaxel liposome (135 mg/m² intravenously on day 1), cisplatin (25 mg/m² intravenously on days 1-3), and fluorouracil (3.75g/m² continuous intravenous infusion for 120 h) induction chemotherapy once every 3 weeks, for 3 cycles, followed by concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m² intravenously) on days 1, 22, and 43 of intensity-modulated radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by fluorouracil (4 g/m² in continuous intravenous infusion for 96 h) and cisplatin (80 mg/m² intravenously on day 1) once every 4 weeks, for 3 cycles. Randomisation was performed using computer-generated random number code with a block size of 6, stratified by nodal category (N2 or N3). The primary endpoint was 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT03306121). Results: Between 20 November 2017 and 19 March 2021, 162 patients were assigned to the induction-concurrent group and 162 to the concurrent-adjuvant group. Regarding the data cutoff (20 January 2024), the median follow-up period was 51.7 months. The 3-year PFS rates were 73.4% (95%CI 65.9%-79.5%) in the induction-concurrent group and 69.8% (95%CI 62.0%-76.2%) in the concurrent-adjuvant group (HR 0.85, [95%CI 0.58-1.26], P=0.43). Patients in the induction-concurrent group had significantly better 3-year distant metastasis-free survival rate at 81.4% (95% CI, 74.5%–86.6%) compared with those in the concurrent-adjuvant group at 71.0% (95% CI, 63.3%–77.3%) (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42–0.98; p=0.04). There were no differences on overall survival and locoregional failure-free survival between the two groups. The most common acute grade 3 + adverse events were leukopenia (53 [33.1%] of 160 in the induction-concurrent group vs. 47 [33.1%] of 142 in the concurrent-adjuvant group), neutropenia (51 [31.9%] vs. 32 [22.5%]), and mucositis (47 [29.4%] vs. 42 [29.6%]). The most common grade 3 + late adverse event was auditory or hearing loss (10 [6.3%] vs. 12 [8.5%]). Conclusions: Induction-concurrent chemotherapy does not significantly improve PFS compared with concurrent-adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk N2–3 NPC. Long-term follow-up is required to determine long-term efficacy and toxicities. Clinical trial information: NCT03306121 .

Effects of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without Endostar on the regression of retropharyngeal lymph node and prognosis of patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study

Background and PurposeTo investigate the effect of combining Endostar with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (ECCRT) compared to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) on the regression rate of retropharyngeal lymph nodes (RLNs) and the relationship between regression rate of RLNs and prognosis of patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC).MethodsA total of 122 LANPC patients with RLNs metastasis were included. Metastatic RLNs were delineated both before and after treatment slice by slice on the magnetic resonance images cross-section. The regression rate of RLNs, adverse effects (AE) were evaluated. The median regression rate of RLNs was taken as the cut-off value, and the patients were furtherly divided into high regression rate (HRR) group and low regression rate (LRR) group, then survival times were evaluated.ResultsThe median regression rates of RLNs in the ECCRT and CCRT groups were 81% and 50%, respectively (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 AEs between the two groups, except for oral mucositis (ECCRT 26.23% vs. CCRT 44.26%, P = 0.037). The 3-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS) rates in the HRR and LRR groups were 85.48% and 86.67% (P = 0.983), 80.65% and 68.33% (P = 0.037), 83.87% and 85% (P = 0.704), 93.55% and 81.67% (P = 0.033), respectively.ConclusionsPatients in the ECCRT group had higher regression rates of RLNs and lower incidence of severe oral mucositis. Furthermore, patients in the HRR group had a better 3-year PFS and LRFFS rate than those in the LRR group.

Survival outcomes and toxicity profiles among patients with nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus IMRT + carbon-ion radiotherapy: A propensity score-matched analysis.

To compare survival outcomes and toxic effects among patients with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) when treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus IMRT + carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT). We performed a retrospective propensity score matching analysis (1:1) of patients treated with IMRT and IMRT + CIRT. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the baseline characteristics of the patients. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to identify the independent predictors of survival. We examined the association between risk factors and adverse events (AEs) using chi-square tests. Cox model and logistic regression were used to analyze AEs. Hundred and nine patients who received IMRT + CIRT were included and the median follow-up time was 20.6 months (range: 4.6-82 months). There were no statistically significant differences in locoregional failure-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, or overall survival between the two groups, but potentially better in IMRT + CIRT group (p > 0.05, respectively). Nodal boost was the only significant factor associated with LRFS and DFS on multivariable analysis. Thirty-seven patients (34.0%) developed grade 3 acute OMs and no grade 4 acute OMs were observed in IMRT + CIRT group. All patients in IMRT + CIRT group developed grade 1 dermatitis; while in the match group, 76 patients developed grade 1 dermatitis, 27 patients developed grade 2 dermatitis, 5 patients developed grade 3 dermatitis, 1 patient developed grade 4 dermatitis. IMRT + CIRT treatment was associated with a significant trend of lower grades of OM and dermatitis (p < 0.05, respectively). Any severe (i.e., grade 3) chronic AEs, such as xerostomia, skin fibrosis, temporal lobe necrosis, osteoradionecrosis, or radiation-induced optic neuropathy, was not observed. In this study, IMRT + CIRT was associated with significantly reduced acute toxicity burden compared with full course of IMRT, with excellent survival outcomes. Patients with persistent disease after treatment and treated with nodal boost had a worse outcome. More accurate assessments of IMRT + CIRT to primary nonmetastatic NPC patients will be imperative.

Survival Outcomes in Different Sino-nasal Malignancies: An Institutional Review

Objective: The purpose of this review is to comprehend the treatment outcome of different PNS cancer histologies and their survival. Materials and Procedures: A review of our institutional database from January 2010 to December 2022 included 122 sinonasal cancer patients. After exclusions, 84 patients whose data sets were complete underwent analysis. Overall survival (OS), loco-regional failure-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) were the measured endpoints. Results: With a median follow-up time of 26 months, there was no correlation detected between histological type and OS, LRFS, or DMFS. It was discovered that the type of treatment technique was substantially related to LRFS. Surgery plus adjuvant radiation and/or chemotherapy had a minor tendency to be significant in terms of OS, with a median OS of 56 months (95% CI: 38.6–73.3). Conclusions: It showed that the use of different treatment modalities had an impact on LRFS, while the type of histology did not correlate with the effectiveness of the treatment.

Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Radiotherapy vs Chemoradiotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy is recommended for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma but is associated with higher rates of acute toxic effects and low compliance. Evidence on de-escalating treatment intensity after induction chemotherapy is limited. To assess if radiotherapy was noninferior to chemoradiotherapy after induction chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. From April 2015 to March 2018, a multicenter, open-label, randomized, noninferiority, phase 3 trial was conducted at 5 Chinese hospitals. A total of 383 patients aged 18 to 70 years with an untreated histologically confirmed nonkeratinizing tumor, Karnofsky performance status score not worse than 70, proper organ function, and stage III to IVB nasopharyngeal cancer were enrolled. Data were analyzed from April 2023 to June 2023. Patients were assigned randomly. Both groups received 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy consisting of intravenous administration (on day 1) of cisplatin at 60 mg/m2 and docetaxel at 60 mg/m2 and continuous intravenous infusion (from day 1 to day 5) of daily fluorouracil (600 mg/m2), repeated every 21 days. Subsequently, the patients received radiotherapy alone (induction chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy [IC-RT] group) or concomitant cisplatin (30 mg/m2/week) with radiotherapy for 6 to 7 weeks (induction chemotherapy combined with chemoradiotherapy [IC-CCRT] group). The primary end point was 3-year progression-free survival (time from the initiation of therapy until the first indication of disease progression or death), with a noninferiority margin of 10%. The secondary end points included overall survival, locoregional failure-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, response rate, and toxic effects. A total of 383 patients (median [range] age, 48 [19-70] years; 100 women [26%]). Median follow-up time was 76 months (IQR, 70-89 months). The 3-year progression-free survival was 76.2% and 76.8% in the IC-RT (n = 193) and IC-CCRT groups (n = 190), respectively, in the intention-to-treat population, showing a difference of 0.6% (95% CI, -7.9% to 9.1%; P = .01 for noninferiority). Identical outcomes were reported in the per-protocol population. The incidence of grade 3 to 4 short-term toxic effects in the IC-RT group was less than the IC-CCRT group. No differences were observed in late toxic effects. The results of this randomized clinical trial suggest that after induction chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, radiotherapy alone was noninferior to chemoradiotherapy in terms of 3-year progression-free survival. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02434614.

Long-term clinical outcomes and prognosis after definitive radiotherapy for patients with cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-institution retrospective study.

Definitive radiotherapy has become a more common treatment for cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC), but data about long-term clinical outcomes is still relatively sparse. The purpose of this study was to describe long-term clinical outcomes after definitive radiotherapy for CESCC, and identify the prognostic factors influencing these outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed all patients who received definitive radiotherapy for CESCC at our institution between 2006 and 2014. The overall survival (OS) rate, locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS) rate, and toxicities were retrospectively evaluated during long-term follow-up. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors. A total of 120 patients were included for analysis. The median prescribed radiation dose for the gross tumor and metastatic lymph nodes was 60 Gy. Elective nodal irradiation (ENI) was performed on 99 patients (83%); 90 patients (75%) received concurrent chemotherapy. The OS rates were 22.7% at 5 years and 14.9% at 8 years. The LRFFS rates at 3, 5, and 8 years were 27.5%, 21.7%, and 15.0%, respectively. The univariate analysis suggested that N classification and non-regional lymph node metastasis (M1Lym) status were independent risk factors for overall survival (P<0.01). A dose of more than 60 Gy didn't have a statistically significant influence in the multivariate analysis, although a total dose of more than 60 Gy was associated with improved survival in the univariate analysis. Concurrent chemotherapy was not associated with OS or LRFFS time in the univariate or multivariate analysis. A total of 74 patients (61.7%) experienced locoregional treatment failure. The most commonly documented acute toxicities were grade 1 and grade 2 toxicities in 61 patients (50.8%). There were 2 patients diagnosed with hypothyroidism as a late toxicity event. Definitive radiotherapy is a reasonable curative treatment option with laryngopharyngeal preservation for CESCC patients. Radical treatments for lymph node metastases may improve the OS and LRFFS times. Monitoring for thyroid function may be warranted during long-term follow-up.

A Pilot Trial of Consolidation Bevacizumab after Hypo-Fractionated Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Unresectable Locally Advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

To assess the feasibility of adding bevacizumab consolidation into hypo-fractionated concurrent chemoradiotherapy (hypo-CCRT) in patients with unresectable locally advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NS-NSCLC). Eligible patients were treated with hypo-RT (40 Gy in 10 fractions) followed by hypo-boost (24-28 Gy in 6-7 fractions) combined with concurrent weekly chemotherapy. Patients completed the hypo-CCRT without≥G2 toxicities then received consolidation bevacizumab every 3 weeks for up to 1 year, or disease progression or unacceptable treatment related toxicities. The primary endpoint was the risk of G4 or higher hemorrhage. The secondary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and objective response rate (ORR). All time-to-event endpoints (OS, PFS, LRFS and DMFS) were measured from the start of radiotherapy. From December 2017 to July 2020, a total of 27 patients were analyzed with a median follow-up duration of 28.0 months. One patient (3.7%) developed G5 hemorrhage during bevacizumab consolidation. Besides, there were 7 patients (25.9%) had G3 cough and 3 patients (11.1%) had G3 pneumonitis. The ORR was 92.6% of the whole cohort. The median OS was 37.0 months (95% confidence interval, 8.9-65.1 months), the median PFS was 16.0 months (95% confidence interval, 14.0-18.0 months), the median LRFS was not reached and the median DMFS was 18.0 months. This pilot study met its goal of demonstrating the tolerability of consolidation bevacizumab after hypo-CCRT. Further investigation of antiangiogenic and immunotherapy combinations in LA-NSCLC is warranted while G3 respiratory toxicities is worth considering.

Curative high-dose reirradiation for patients with recurrent head and neck adenoid cystic carcinomas: outcomes and analysis of patterns of failure

Background To investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent curative reirradiation (reRT), with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or proton therapy (PT) for unresectable recurrent or second primary head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (HNACC). Methods Ten patients, mostly KPS 90%, were reirradiated (3/10 with IMRT and 7/10 with PT) at a median maximum dose to the CTV of 64.2 Gy from July 2011 to November 2021. Locations at the time of reRT were mainly the sinus (4/10) and the salivary glands (including the parotid and submandibular gland, 3/10). CTCAEv5 was used to assess acute and late toxicities. Follow-up was the time between the end of reRT and the date of last news. Results The median time between the two irradiations was 53.5 months (IQR: 18–84). After a median follow-up of 26 months (range, 12.5–51.8 months), six patients had developed a locoregional recurrence (LR), of which four occurred within the previously irradiated volume. Two and three-year locoregional failure-free survival (LFFS) and overall survival (OS) were 55.6% [95%CI: 31–99.7%], and 41% [18.5–94%] and 66.7% [42–100%] and 44.4% [21.4–92.3%], respectively. LFFS and OS were significantly better in the subgroup of sinus tumors (p = .013) and the subgroup of patients re-irradiated more than two years after the first course of irradiation (p = .01). Seven patients had impairments before the start of reRT, including hearing impairment (3/10) and facial nerve impairment (3/10). The most severe late toxicities were brain necrosis (2/10), osteoradionecrosis (1/10) and vision decreased (1/10). Conclusion Curative reRT for HNACC is possible for selected cases, but the LR rate in the irradiated field and the risk of severe toxicity remain high. Improved selection criteria and more carefully defined target volumes may improve outcome in these patients. A further study including larger cohort of patients would be useful to confirm these results.

A pilot trial of consolidation bevacizumab after hypo-fractionated concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

To determine the feasibility of incorporating bevacizumab consolidation into hypo-fractionated concurrent chemoradiotherapy (hypo-CCRT) for patients with unresectable locally advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NS-NSCLC). Eligible patients were treated with hypo-RT (40Gy in 10 fractions) followed by hypo-boost (24-28Gy in 6-7 fractions), along with concurrent weekly chemotherapy. Patients who completed the hypo-CCRT without experiencing ≥G2 toxicities received consolidation bevacizumab every 3 weeks for up to 1 year, until disease progression or unacceptable treatment-related toxicities. The primary endpoint was the risk of G4 or higher hemorrhage. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and objective response rate (ORR). All time-to-event endpoints (OS, PFS, LRFS, and DMFS) were measured from the start of radiotherapy. Between December 2017 and July 2020, a total of 27 patients were included in the analysis, with a median follow-up duration of 28.0 months. One patient (3.7%) developed G5 hemorrhage during bevacizumab consolidation. Additionally, seven patients (25.9%) had G3 cough and three patients (11.1%) experienced G3 pneumonitis. The ORR for the entire cohort was 92.6%. The median OS was 37.0 months (95% confidence interval, 8.9-65.1 months), the median PFS was 16.0 months (95% confidence interval, 14.0-18.0 months), the median LRFS was not reached, and the median DMFS was 18.0 months. This pilot study met its goal of demonstrating the tolerability of consolidation bevacizumab after hypo-CCRT. Further investigation of antiangiogenic and immunotherapy combinations in LA-NSCLC is warranted, while the potential for grade 3 respiratory toxicities should be taken into consideration.

Patterns of failure in nasopharyngeal cancer patients of northeastern region of India.

94 Background: We aimed to analyze patterns of failure and relationship between disease volume and treatment outcomes in patients of Nasopharyngeal cancer receiving chemoradiation at tertiary cancer centre in northeast region of India. Methods: From February 2018 to February 2022, 99 histopathologically proven non metastatic NPC patients treated with IMRT and chemotherapy were analysed retrospectively. Locally advanced patients received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Locoregional failures were classified as in-field or out-of-field in relation to the CT data sets used for pretreatment planning. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate the impact of various prognostic factors on locoregional free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The log-rank test and Kaplan-Meir curves were used to compare outcome variables based on classified tumour volume as determined by ROC analysis. Results: During a median follow up of 25.4 months (17.3-39.2), 35 (35.4%) patients developed recurrence. Twenty-nine patients developed locoregional failures, of which 11 were in-field; 12 patient showed an out-field failure. The 3-year LRFS, DMFS, PFS and OS was 71.10%, 70.90%, 64.10 and 74.10 % respectively. There was statistically significant difference in locoregional failure-free survival according to T staging (p&lt;0.0001). Cox regression analysis revealed that gross tumor volume(GTVp) and gross nodal volume(GTVn) were an independent prognostic factor for OS, PFS, LRFS and DMFS. The cut-off volumes for GTVp and GTVn for distant metastases and locoregional failure, respectively, were found to be 13 and 22.7 mL and 3.7 and 39.2 mL, respectively, by ROC curve analysis. Based on this, 99 patients were divided into three subgroups. OS demonstrated significant differences among patients in different volume subgroups for GTVp (p=0.03) and GTVn (p=0.00024) and were superior to T classification for predicting prognosis of NPC patients. Conclusions: Distant failure is most common pattern of failure. With advanced T-stage NPC, locoregional failure is more common. GTVp and GTVn are an independent prognostic factor in local control, distant metastasis, disease-free survival, and overall survival in NPC. This justifies their use as quantitative prognostic indicator for NPC.

Pretreatment dual-energy CT for predicting early response to induction chemotherapy and survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

To evaluate the predictive performance of pretreatment dual-energy CT (DECT) for early response to induction chemotherapy and survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). In this retrospective study, 56 NPC patients who underwent pretreatment DECT scans with posttreatment follow-up were enrolled. The DECT-derived normalised iodine concentration (nIC), effective atomic number (Zeff), 40-180keV (20keV interval), and Mix-0.3 value of the tumour lesions were measured to predict the early response to induction chemotherapy and survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The Mann‒Whitney U test, ROC analysis, Kaplan‒Meier method with log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards model were performed to evaluate the predictive performance of DECT parameters, respectively. Among all DECT-derived parameters, ROC analysis showed the predictive performances of nIC and Zeff values for early objective response to induction chemotherapy (AUCs of 0.803 and 0.826), locoregional failure-free survival (AUCs of 0.786 and 0.767), progression-free survival (AUCs of 0.856 and 0.731) and overall survival (AUCs of 0.765 and 0.799) in NPC patients, respectively (all p < 0.05). Moreover, multivariate analysis showed that a high nIC value was an independent predictor of poor survival in NPC. In addition, survival analysis indicated that NPC patients with higher nIC values in primary tumours tend to have lower 5-year locoregional failure-free survival, progression-free survival and overall survival rates than those with lower nIC values. DECT-derived nIC and Zeff values can predict early response to induction chemotherapy and survival in NPC; in particular, a high nIC value is an independent predictive factor of poor survival in NPC. Preoperative dual-energy computed tomography may provide predictive value for early response and survival outcomes in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and facilitate their clinical management. • Pretreatment dual-energy computed tomography helps to predict early response to therapy and survival in NPC. • NIC and Zeff values derived from dual-energy computed tomography can predict early objective response to induction chemotherapy and survival in NPC. • A high nIC value is an independent predictive factor of poor survival in NPC.

Could definitive radiotherapy be a treatment option for lymphoepithelial carcinoma of major salivary gland: Comparison of clinical outcomes of upfront surgery and upfront chemoradiotherapy

ObjectivesThe optimal treatment and associated clinical outcomes for lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the major salivary gland (LECSG) are currently unclear. As such, the purpose of this study was to assess the survival rates of LECSG patients who received either upfront surgery or upfront chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Materials and methodsIn this retrospective study, we analyzed cases of LECSG patients treated at our center from January 2010 to April 2021. The cumulative incidences of overall survival rate (OS) and locoregional failure-free survival rate (LRFFS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In order to balance potential risk factors between the treatment groups, we conducted propensity score matching (PSM) at a 1:1 ratio. ResultsThe study enrolled a total of 107 patients, among whom 24 received surgery alone, 56 underwent surgery combined with postoperative radiotherapy, and 27 underwent definitive radiotherapy. The 5-year LRFFS rate and 5-year OS rate for the entire cohort were 86.6% and 84.4%, respectively. Following PSM, the 5-year LRFFS and OS rates for the upfront CRT cases were comparable to those of upfront surgery, both before and after matching. However, the upfront surgery group showed a tendency toward more de novo facial nerve injury and post-treatment facial nerve injury. ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that upfront CRT is as effective as upfront surgery in terms of locoregional control and overall survival for LECSG patients. Therefore, upfront CRT could be considered a viable treatment option, potentially avoiding the risks associated with surgical intervention.

Safety and Efficacy of 2D Brachytherapy vs. 3D Image-Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer-A Single Institution Retrospective Study.

The treatment paradigm for locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) has shifted from two-dimensional-brachytherapy (2D-BT) to three-dimensional-image-guided adaptive BT (3D-IGABT). In this retrospective study, we report our experience with the change from 2D-BT to 3D-IGABT. We reviewed 146 LACC patients (98 3D-IGABT and 48 2D-BT) who received chemoradiation between 2004 and 2019. The multivariable odds ratio (OR) for treatment-related toxicities and hazard ratios (HR) for locoregional control (LRC), distant control (DC), failure-free survival (FFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) are reported. The median follow-up was 50.3 months. There was a significant decrease in overall late toxicities in the 3D-IGABT group compared to the 2D-BT group (OR 0.22[0.10-0.52]), late gastrointestinal (OR 0.31[0.10-0.93]), genitourinary (OR 0.31[0.09-1.01]) and vaginal toxicities (0% vs. 29.6%). Grade ≥ 3 toxicity was low in both groups (2D-BT: 8.2% acute, 13.3% late vs. 3D-IGABT: 6.3% acute, 4.4% late, NS). The five-year LRC, DC, FFS, CSS and OS for 3D-IGABT were 92.0%, 63.4%, 61.7%, 75.4% and 73.6%, compared to 87.3%, 71.8%, 63.7%, 76.3% and 70.8% for 2D-BT (NS). 3D-IGABT for the treatment of LACC is associated with a decrease in overall late gastrointestinal, genitourinary and vaginal toxicities. The disease control or survival outcomes were comparable to contemporary 3D-IGABT studies.

Hypofractionated Radiotherapy followed by Hypofractionated Boost with weekly concurrent chemotherapy for Unresectable Stage III Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results of A Prospective Phase II Study (GASTO-1049)

We launched a prospective phase 2 clinical trial to explore the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated radiation therapy (hypo-RT) followed by hypofractionated boost (hypo-boost) combined with concurrent weekly chemotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Patients with newly diagnosed LA-NSCLC with unresectable stage III disease were recruited between June 2018 and June 2020. Patients were treated with hypo-RT (40 Gy in 10 fractions) followed by hypo-boost (24-28 Gy in 6-7 fractions) combined with concurrent weekly chemotherapy (docetaxel 25 mg/m2 and nedaplatin 25 mg/m2). The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), objective response rate (ORR), and toxicities. From June 2018 to June 2020, 75 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up duration of 28.0 months. The ORR of the whole cohort was 94.7%. Disease progression or death was recorded in 44 (58.7%) patients, with a median PFS of 21.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.6-27.6 months). The 1- and 2-year PFS rates were 81.3% (95% CI, 72.5%-90.1%) and 43.3% (95% CI, 31.5%-55.1%), respectively. The median OS, DMFS, and LRFS had not been reached at the time of the last follow-up. The 1- and 2-year OS rates were 94.7% (95% CI, 89.6%-99.8%) and 72.4% (95% CI, 62.0%-82.8%), respectively. The most frequent acute nonhematologic toxicity was radiation esophagitis. Grade (G) 2 and G3 acute radiation esophagitis were observed in 20 (26.7%) and 4 (5.3%) patients, respectively. Thirteen patients (13/75, 17.3%) had G2 pneumonitis and no G3-G5 acute pneumonitis occurred during follow-up. Hypo-RT followed by hypo-boost combined with concurrent weekly chemotherapy could yield satisfactory local control and survival outcomes with moderate radiation-induced toxicity in patients with LA-NSCLC. The new potent hypo-CCRT regimen significantly shortened treatment time and provided the potential opportunity for the combination of consolidative immunotherapy.

T1-2N1M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma chemotherapy or not: A retrospective study.

Radiotherapy (RT) combined with chemotherapy is the standard treatment for T1-2N1M0 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) based on conventional radiotherapy. However, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has narrowed the treatment gap between RT and chemoradiotherapy. Thus, this retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of RT and chemoradiotherapy (RT-chemo) in treating T1-2N1M0 NPC in the IMRT era. From January 2008 to December 2016, 343 consecutive patients with T1-2N1M0 NPC in two cancer centers were included. All patients received RT or RT-chemo, chemotherapy including induction chemotherapy (IC) + concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), CCRT, or CCRT + adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). The number of patients who received RT, CCRT, IC + CCRT, and CCRT + AC was 114, 101, 89, and 39. The survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify valuable prognostic factors. The median follow-up time for survivors was 93 (range: 55-144) months. The 5-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) for the RT-chemo and RT groups were 93.7%, 88.5%, 93.8%, 93.8% and 93.0%, 87.7%, 91.9%, 91.2%, respectively (P>0.05 for all outcomes). No significant survival differences were found between the two groups. The T1N1M0 or T2N1M0 subgroup analysis showed that treatment outcomes had no significant differences between the RT and RT-chemo groups. After adjusting for various factors, treatment mode was not identified as an independent prognostic factor for all survival rates. In this study, outcomes of T1-2N1M0 NPC patients treated by IMRT alone were comparable to chemoradiotherapy, supporting the omission or postponement of chemotherapy.

Metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma to the parotid: Adjuvant radiotherapy and treatment outcomes.

Adjuvant radiotherapy is an established component in the management of metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) involving the parotid gland. Radiotherapy technique, dose and volumes are seldom described sufficiently to allow close examination. We report our treatment outcomes and focus on treatment-related factors that affect outcomes in this cohort. We performed a retrospective review of patients with metastatic cutaneous SCCs who underwent parotidectomy with or without ipsilateral neck dissection. All patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. Demographics, clinical data and treatment details were collected from an intuitional electronic database. Individual patient-level radiotherapy technique, volumes and doses were reviewed. Between July 2008 and July 2018, 60 patients met our inclusion criteria. Median follow-up duration was 32.7 months. The mean age was 66.4 years. The majority of patients (49 patients) received full neck irradiation. The 2-year and 5-year loco-regional failure-free survival was 87% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-0.93) and 71% (95% CI: 0.52, 0.83), respectively. The 2-year and 5-year overall survival was 76% (95% CI: 0.62, 0.85) and 60% (95% CI: 0.45, 0.72), respectively. There were 15 cases of loco-regional failures, with 6 cases with dermal involvement. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was associated with higher loco-regional failure (hazard ratio: 8.43, 95% CI: 1.85-38.39, P =0.005) and cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio: 5.40, 95% CI: 1.40-20.87, P=0.015). Treatment technique, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) vs 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT), bolus use, perineural invasion (PNI) and surgical margins were not significantly associated with loco-regional failure. We demonstrated high loco-regional control rates with routine use of comprehensive adjuvant radiotherapy. The presence of LVI was identified as a strong predictor for recurrence. Further analysis will help to define optimal radiation dose and techniques.

Association Between Thyroid Radiation Dose and Hypothyroidism in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Regional Nodal Irradiation.

To investigate the association between the thyroid dysfunction and thyroid radiation dose in regional nodal irradiation (RNI) using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for breast cancer. We reviewed medical data of 67 patients with breast cancer who underwent curative surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy, including RNI using VMAT, between 2018 and 2021. All patients had normal thyroid functional test results, including thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), T3, and free-T4. We defined subclinical hypothyroidism as increased TSH with or without decreased levels of free-T4 and T3 after the completion of VMAT. We calculated dose-volume histogram parameters (DVHPs), including the mean dose and relative thyroid volume receiving at least 10, 20, 30, and 40 Gy. The median follow-up time was 23.2 months. The 3-year locoregional failure-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 96.3%, 94.7%, and 96.2%, respectively. The mean thyroid dose was 21.4 Gy (range=11.5-29.4 Gy). Subclinical hypothyroidism was noted in 14 patients (20.9%) and the median time to the event was 4.1 months. Among the DVHPs, the relative volume receiving ≥20 Gy (V20Gy) was associated with subclinical hypothyroidism. The 2-year rates of subclinical hypothyroidism were 24.8% and 59.1% in patients with V20Gy ≤46.3% and >46.3%, respectively. A significant proportion of patients with breast cancer developed subclinical hypothyroidism after undergoing VMAT for RNI. Our findings highlight the importance of considering the thyroid as an organ at risk for VMAT planning, and suggest that V20Gy could be a useful dose-volume constraint.

Endoscopic surgery versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy in locally advanced recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter, case-matched comparison

BackgroundThe management of locally advanced recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rNPC) is challenging. The objective of our study was to compare salvage endoscopic nasopharyngectomy (ENPG) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in clinical outcomes and complications of locally advanced rNPC.MethodsPatients with histologically confirmed rNPC in rT3-4N0-3M0 stages were retrospectively enrolled between January 2013 and December 2019 in this multicenter, case-matched study. The baseline clinicopathological characteristics of patients were balanced by propensity score matching between the ENPG and IMRT groups. ENPG was performed in patients with easily or potentially resectable tumors. The oncological outcomes as well as treatment-related complications were compared between two groups.ResultsA total of 176 patients were enrolled and 106 patients were matched. The ENPG group (n = 53) and the IMRT group (n = 53) showed comparable outcomes in the 3-year overall survival rate (68.4% vs. 65.4%, P = 0.401), cancer-specific survival rate (80.9% vs. 74.4%, P = 0.076), locoregional failure-free survival rate (36.6% vs. 45.3%, P = 0.076), and progression-free survival rate (27.5% vs. 32.3%, P = 0.216). The incidence of severe treatment-related complications of patients in the ENPG group was lower than that in the IMRT group (37.7% vs. 67.9%, P = 0.002). The most common complications were post perioperative hemorrhage (13.2%) in ENPG group and temporal lobe necrosis (47.2%) in IMRT group, respectively.ConclusionSalvage ENPG exhibits comparable efficacy but less toxicities than IMRT in carefully screened patients with locally advanced rNPC, which may be a new choice of local treatment.Graphical abstract

Efficacy and safety of weekly versus triweekly cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

Cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy is a standard of care for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and weekly and triweekly cisplatin are both alternative regimens based on the results of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. However, there is a lack of direct evidence on the efficacy and safety of weekly versus triweekly cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy in NPC alone. This meta-analysis aimed to identify which regimen is more superior between weekly and triweekly cisplatin in patients with NPC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible literatures. Clinical outcome measures including 1-year overall survival (OS), 3-year OS, 5-year OS, 5-year loco-regional failure-free survival, 5-year distant metastasis-free survial and the most common 3 grade or higher acute toxicities (hematological toxicity, mucositis and nausea and vomiting) were analyzed by RevMan 5.4 software; significance level was 0.05. Seven clinical controlled studies with 1795 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences between weekly and triweekly cisplatin in 1-year OS, 3-year OS, 5-year OS, 5-year loco-regional failure-free survival, and 5-year distant metastasis-free survial) (all P > .05). Grade 3 or higher mucositis and nausea and vomiting showed similar between the 2 arms. However, grade 3 or higher hematological toxicity of weekly cisplatin was significantly higher than that of triweekly cisplatin (1.55; 95% CI, 1.22-1.98, P = .0004). Weekly cisplatin resulted in similar survival benifit as triweekly cisplatin, but with higher hematological toxicity.