In a cadaveric instability model that leaves all muscles intact initially, the latissimus dorsi seemed to play a role when complete section of the glenohumeral capsuloligamentous structures did not result in a locked anteroinferior dislocation. The present study was carried out to determine whether the latissimus dorsi does truly affect dislocation in a modified cutting protocol, and to find an anatomic explanation for this apparent behavior. This article (Part II) details the results of a sequential cutting study and relates these results with the anatomic findings of Part I. In 75 shoulders, the influence of the latissimus dorsi on dislocation behavior in the apprehension position after section of all capsuloligamentous structures was examined. After cutting all capsuloligamentous structures, either on the glenoid or on the humeral side, the tendon of either the latissimus dorsi or the subscapularis was cut. Capsular lesions on the glenoid side (20 shoulders) resulted in a locked dislocation in 16 specimens. In the other four shoulders, there was a metastable dislocation after cutting the entire capsule, which did not change after cutting either tendon. With lesions on the humeral side (55 shoulders), three possibilities arose: metastable (17 shoulders), locked anterior (9 shoulders) or locked anteroinferior (29 shoulders) dislocation. This difference in dislocation behavior was related to the variability of the tendon-cartilage distance (TCD) and the type of scapular connection of the latissimus dorsi. A locked anteroinferior dislocation was always observed when the TCD was more than 20 mm, regardless of the type of scapular connection. With a TCD < 20 mm, a metastable dislocation was the result when there was a type 1 scapular connection and a locked anterior dislocation was seen when there was a type 2 scapular connection. The tendon of the latissimus dorsi can restrain the humeral head from dropping inferiorly or can lead to a spontaneous reduction of a dislocation, depending on its anatomy. This effect can only take place in the infrequent situation of humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligaments. This may be an explanation for the relative paucity of these lesions in clinical instability series.