Primary Tumor Location Research Articles

Results of Primary Treatment and Salvage Treatment in the Management of Patients with Non-Squamous Cell Malignant Tumors of the Sinonasal Region: Single Institution Experience

Non-squamous cell carcinoma-related malignant sinonasal tract tumors (non-SCC MSTT) are rare and diverse malignancies. In this study, we report our experience in the management of this group of patients. The treatment outcome has been presented, involving both primary treatment and salvage approaches. Data from 61 patients treated radically due to non-SCC MSTT between 2000 and 2016 at the National Cancer Research Institute, Gliwice branch, were analyzed. The group consisted of the following pathological subtypes of MSTT: adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC), undifferentiated sinonasal carcinoma (USC), sarcoma, olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB), adenocarcinoma, small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SNC), mucoepidermic carcinoma (MEC), and acinic cell carcinoma, which were found in nineteen (31%), seventeen (28%), seven (11.5%), seven (11.5%), five (8%), three (5%), two (3%) and one (2%) of patients, respectively. There were 28 (46%) males and 33 (54%) females at the median age of 51 years. Maxilla was the primary tumor localization followed by the nasal cavity and ethmoid sinus in thirty-one (51%), twenty (32.5%), and seven (11.5%) patients, respectively. In 46 (74%) patients, an advanced tumor stage (T3 or T4) was diagnosed. Primary nodal involvement (N) was found in three (5%) cases, and all patients underwent radical treatment. The combined treatment consisted of surgery and radiotherapy (RT) and was given to 52 (85%) patients. The probabilities of overall survival (OS), locoregional control (LRC), metastases-free survival (MFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were assessed in pathological subtypes and grouped together, along with the ratio and effectiveness of salvage. Locoregional treatment failure was seen in 21 (34%) patients. Salvage treatment was performed in fifteen (71%) patients and was effective in nine (60%) cases. There was a significant difference in OS between patients who underwent salvage and those who did not (median: 40 months vs. 7 months, p = 0.01). In the group of patients who underwent salvage, OS was significantly longer when the procedure was effective (median: 80.5 months) than if it failed (median: 20.5 months), p < 0.0001. OS in patients after effective salvage was the same as in patients who were primary cured (median: 80.5 months vs. 88 months, p = 0.8). Distant metastases developed in ten (16%) patients. Five and ten year LRC, MFS, DFS, and OS were 69%, 83%, 60%, 70%, and 58%, 83%, 47%, 49%, respectively. The best treatment results were observed for patients with adenocarcinoma and sarcoma, while USC gave the poorest results in our set of patients. In this study, we indicate that salvage is possible in most patients with non-SCC MSTT with locoregional failure and that it may significantly prolong their overall survival.

Lymph node metastatic patterns and the development of multidisciplinary treatment for esophageal cancer.

Abundant lymphatic flow and the anatomical location of the esophagus can result in the widespread distribution of lymph node metastasis of esophageal cancer from the cervical to the abdominal field. Historically, the Japan Esophageal Society and American Joint Committee on Cancer offer two different classifications of lymph node group location surrounding the esophagus. The location of sentinel lymph nodes in midthoracic esophageal cancer reflects the variety of lymphatic drainage routes. In fact, in cT1N0 esophageal cancer, pathological lymph node metastasis has been observed from the cervical to the abdominal field, and the locations were shown to be closely linked to the primary tumor location in advanced stages. While the impact of histology on the distribution of LN metastasis has been extensively debated, a recent prospective study on esophagogastric junction cancer found that metastatic patterns did not differ by histology. Thoracic duct lymph nodes were defined as one of the regional lymph node stations in the mediastinum. Although lymph node metastasis around the thoracic duct has occasionally been observed, the oncologic impact of thoracic duct lymph node dissection has not been fully elucidated. To eradicate tumors locoregionally, three-field lymph node dissection, a strategy for extended lymph node clearance, has been established. In esophagectomy, three-field lymph node dissection is defined as a procedure for complete regional cervico-thoraco-abdominal lymph node dissection. However, its therapeutic efficacy must be evaluated based on the balance between oncological outcomes and possible added surgical risk. To further improve survival, multidisciplinary treatment consisting of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy has been established worldwide as a standard treatment for esophageal cancer. Now that neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy is the standard, adding adjuvant therapy including immunotherapy could be a promising treatment option. The ideal combination of various multidisciplinary treatment approaches and extensive LN dissection need to be established to improve the oncological outcomes for EC patients.

Association of biomarkers and outcomes in patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

532 Background: ICIs form the backbone of treatment for mUC. However, only a minority of pts benefit and additional biomarkers of ICI response are needed. Methods: In our institution, we identified mUC pts treated with ICI monotherapy who had next generation sequencing (NGS). Somatic alterations present in ≥10% of pts ( ARID1A, CCND1, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, ERBB2, FGF3, FGF4, FGF19, FGFR3, KDM6A, MDM2, MLL2, PIK3CA, RB1, TERTp, TP53, TSC1), as well as DNA-damage response (DDR) alterations and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were analyzed as biomarkers. These biomarkers were individually evaluated in separate multivariate models while accounting for clinical factors including age, BMI, ECOG PS, primary tumor location, histology, hemoglobin, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and albumin. Multivariate cox regression and logistic regression models were used to measure hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and observed response rate (ORR). Results: Among 152 mUC ICI-treated pts, 107 had NGS data (FoundationOne, UCSF500, Strata), including 85 with TMB data. For the 107 pts with NGS, median age was 70 yrs, majority were male (69, 64%), Caucasian (70, 65%), had pure urothelial histology (57, 53%), and had first-line ICI (55, 51%). ORR was 35%, median PFS was 3.9 mos (95% CI: 2.6-7.5 mos), and median OS was 17.4 mos (95% CI: 14.1-30.6 mos). Biomarkers associated with improved outcomes to ICI, independent of relevant clinical factors, included alterations in ARID1A and DDR, as well as high TMB (&gt;10 Mut/Mb). Inferior outcomes were seen in pts with CDKN2B, KDM6A, FGF3, FGF4, and FGF19 alterations (Table). Conclusions: In this large retrospective multivariate analysis controlling for clinical factors in ICI-treated mUC pts, we found multiple biomarkers associated with improved or inferior outcomes. These hypothesis-generating findings can inform clinical decision making and trial design for mUC pts treated with ICIs, and should be validated in larger cohorts. [Table: see text]

SPADE: Design of a real-world observational study of avelumab first-line (1L) maintenance in advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region.

TPS577 Background: UC is a common cancer, with &gt;200,000 new cases reported in the APAC region in 2020. In the global phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial, avelumab 1L maintenance + best supportive care (BSC) significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) vs BSC alone in patients with advanced UC that had not progressed with 1L platinum-containing chemotherapy (median OS, 23.8 vs 15.0 months [p=0.0036]; median PFS, 5.5 vs 2.1 months [p&lt;0.0001]), leading to regulatory approvals worldwide and incorporation into international treatment guidelines with level 1 evidence. The objectives of the SPADE noninterventional study are to evaluate real-world patient characteristics, treatment patterns, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and treatment outcomes with avelumab maintenance administered in patients with advanced UC without disease progression after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy in the APAC region. Methods: SPADE is a multicenter, prospective, observational study ongoing in Australia, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Republic of Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, and other countries. Overall, 286 patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic (stage IV) measurable UC of any histology that has not progressed with 1L platinum-containing chemotherapy, for whom avelumab 1L maintenance therapy is planned, will be enrolled. All patients will receive avelumab 800 mg intravenously every 2 weeks (or per local marketing authorization) and will be followed up for 12 months or until avelumab is discontinued. The decision to start avelumab treatment should be made in advance by the treating physician and per local clinical practice. Data collected will include patient demographics (ECOG performance status, renal function, history of UC, primary tumor location, location of metastases, and prior therapy), treatment details for 1L platinum-based chemotherapy (regimen, cycles, and response per RECIST), treatment details for avelumab 1L maintenance (interval from end of chemotherapy until initiation, duration of avelumab treatment, and planned subsequent treatment), and treatment outcomes with avelumab 1L maintenance (6- and 12-month OS and health-related quality of life). Data sources will include medical records collected during routine clinical care. Data for baseline treatment patterns will be summarized using descriptive statistics. OS will be analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Health-related quality of life, including changes over time, will be measured using the EQ-5D-5L and National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Bladder Symptom Index (NCCN/FACT FBISI-18) questionnaires. An interim analysis is planned after ~30% of patients have been enrolled.

Frequency of seizures in patients with metastatic brain tumors.

We sought to determine the influence of primary tumor histology and metastatic tumor location on the frequency of seizures among patients with brain metastases. A secondary aim was to determine if surgery reduced the occurrence and frequency of seizures. We retrospectively reviewed patients with cerebral metastasis at a single institution from 2006 to 2016. Among 1949 patients identified as having had cerebral metastasis, 168 (8.6%) had documentation of one or more seizures. The incidence of seizures was highest among patients with metastases from melanoma (19.8%), followed by those with colon cancer (9.7%), renal cell carcinoma (RCC; 8.3%), and lung cancer (7.0%). Among 1581 patients with melanoma, colon cancer, RCC, non-small cell lung cancer, or breast cancer, having metastases in the frontal lobe seemed to confer the greatest risk of seizures (n = 100), followed by foci in the temporal lobe (n = 20) and elsewhere (n = 16). Patients with cerebral metastasis are at increased risk for seizures. Seizure rates seem to be higher for certain primary tumors, such as melanoma, colon cancer, and RCC, and for lesions located in the frontal lobe.

Occult nodal metastases in T1-T2cN0 oral squamous cell carcinoma: Correlation between sentinel node positivity and completion neck dissection analysis

ObjectivesSentinel node procedure (SN) is a standard procedure that has shown its safety and effectiveness for T1/T2 cN0 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), with completion neck dissection (CND) for patients with positive SN. The aim of this study was to characterize the nodal involvement in a cohort of SN + OSCC. Materials and MethodsPatients with T1/T2 cN0 OSCC with positive SN with CND were included in this single-center, prospective cohort study between 2000 and 2013. Results54/301 patients had at least one positive SN. In 43/54 (80 %) cases, only the SN(s) were invaded; with only one SN involved (SN+=1) in 36/54 (67 %) cases. No predictive factors of nodal involvement in the CND were found considering the followings: SN micro/macrometastases, primary tumor’s depth of invasion (DOI), perineural spread, lymphovascular involvement, primary tumor location, T stage and extranodal extension. The SN micrometastatic involvement (n = 22) was significantly associated with only one SN + CND- (p = 0.017). In the group of patients with unique micrometastatic involvement in the SN (n = 20/54), there was a higher isolated nodal recurrence free time (p = 0.017). Conclusion80% of T1/T2 cN0 OSCC with positive SN had no other lymph node metastases in the CND, questioning the potential benefits of this procedure. Predictive factors such as the size of the SN metastasis need to be tested to stratify the risk of positive non-SN lymph nodes leading to a personalized treatment, lowering the therapeutic morbidity while maintaining the oncologic safety.

Is serum thymidine kinase 1 a prognostic biomarker in primary tumor location of colorectal carcinomas?

AimTo assess whether serum thymidine kinase 1 (STK1p), CEA and CA19.9 can be used as prognostic biomarkers in the primary tumor location (PTL) of colorectal carcinoma (CRC). Additional clinical factors of TNM stage, pathological grade, age and sex were also included.MethodsSTK1p was determined by an ECL-dot-blot assay, and CEA/CA19.9 was determined by an automatic electrochemiluminescence analyzer in a retrospective presurgery of right-colon carcinoma (R-CC, n = 90), left-colon carcinoma (L-CC, n = 128) and rectal carcinoma (RC, n = 270). Prognostic factors were evaluated by COX and overall survival (OS).ResultsThe multivariate-COX and OS in relation to the prognostic factors of PTL in CRC were different and complex. An elevated STK1p value was significantly associated with poor OS in RC (P = 0.002) and L-CC (P = 0.037) but not in R-CC (P > 0.05). Elevated CEA (P≈.000) and CA19.9 (P≈.000) were significantly associated with poor OS in RC but not in L-CC and R-CC. Multivariate-COX showed that STK1p (P = 0.02, HR = 1.779, 95%CI 1.30–7.582), CEA (P = 0.001, HR = 2.052, 95%CI 1.320–3.189), CA19.9 (P≈.000, HR = 2.574, 95%CI 1.592–4.162) and TNM-stage (P≈.000, HR = 2.368, 95%CI 1.518–3.694) were independent prognostic factors in RC, while TNM-stage was an independent prognostic factor only in R-CC (P = 0.011, HR = 3.139, 95% CI 1.30–7.582) and L-CC (P≈.000, HR = 4.168, 95%CI 1.980–8.852). Moreover, elevated STK1p was significantly more sensitive (P < .001) for predicting mortality than CEA and CA19.9. No correlation was found between STK1p, CEA or AFP.ConclusionCombining TNM stage and suitable biomarkers, STK1p provides further reliable information on the survival of PTL of CRC.

Primary tumour side as a driver for treatment choice in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and pooled analysis of randomised trials

BackgroundRetrospective subgroup analyses of previous trials in the first-line therapy of RAS wt metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) suggested a predictive impact of primary tumour side on the efficacy of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents. Recently, new head-to-head trials of doublets/bevacizumab versus doublets/anti-EGFR, PARADIGM and CAIRO5 were presented. Patients and methodsWe searched for phase II and III trials comparing doublet chemotherapy plus an anti-EGFR or bevacizumab as the first-line treatment for RAS wt mCRC patients. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and radical resection rate result in the overall study populations and, according to the primary side, were pooled together in a two-stage analysis with random effects and fixed effect models. The interaction between sidedness and treatment effect was then analysed. ResultsWe identified five trials (PEAK, CALGB/SWOG 80405, FIRE-3, PARADIGM and CAIRO5), including 2739 patients, 77% left- and 23% right-sided. Among patients with left-sided mCRC, the use of anti-EGFRs was associated with higher ORR (74% versus 62%, OR = 1.77 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.39–2.26–0.88], p < 0.0001), longer OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.77 [95% CI 0.68–0.88], p < 0.0001) and not significantly longer PFS (HR = 0.92, p = 0.19). Among patients with right-sided mCRC, the use of bevacizumab was associated with longer PFS (HR = 1.36 [95% CI 1.12–1.65], p = 0.002) and not significantly longer OS (HR = 1.17, p = 0.14). A subgroup analysis confirmed a significant interaction effect between the primary tumour side and treatment arm in terms of ORR (p = 0.02), PFS (p = 0.0004) and OS (p = 0.001). No differences in the radical resection rate were found according to treatment and sidedness. ConclusionsOur updated metanalysis corroborates the role of the primary tumour location in the choice of the upfront therapy for RAS wt mCRC patients, leading to strongly recommend anti-EGFRs in left-sided tumours and to prefer bevacizumab in the right-sided.

Claudin18.2 expression and clinicopathological features in cytology effusion specimens from gastric adenocarcinoma: Acomparative study with tissue specimens.

Zolbetuximab (IMAB362) is under investigation for treating advanced gastrointestinal tumors because it targets Claudin18.2 (CLDN18.2). CLDN18.2 is a promising molecule along with the presence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 in gastric cancer. This study evaluated cell block (CB) preparations of serous cavity effusions for the feasibility for CLDN18.2 protein expression and compared the results with those of biopsy or resection specimens. The association of CLDN18.2 expression in effusion samples and the clinicopathological features were also investigated. Cytological effusion specimens and matched surgical pathology biopsy or resection specimens of 43 gastric and gastroesophageal junctional cancer cases were stained for CLDN18.2 expression and quantified using immunohistochemistry based on the manufacturer's instructions. Positive staining was detected in 34 (79.1%) tissue and 27 (62.8%) effusion CB samples in this study. When "positivity" was defined as moderate-to-strong staining in ≥40% viable tumor cells, CLDN18.2 expression was observed in 24 (55.8%) tissue and 22 (51.2%) effusion CB samples. A cutoff of 40% for CLDN18.2 positivity was used to demonstrate high concordance (83.7%) between cytology CB and tissue specimens. The results showed that CLDN18.2 expression in effusion specimens correlated with tumor size (p=.021) but not with sex, age at diagnosis, primary tumor location, staging, Lauren phenotype, cytomorphologic features, or Epstein-Barr virus infection. Cytological effusions with or without CLDN18.2 expression did not significantly affect overall survival. This study's results show that serous body cavity effusions may be suitable for CLDN18.2 biomarker testing; however, discordant cases should be interpreted cautiously.

Association of primary tumor location with long-term oncological prognosis following hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma:A multicenter propensity score matching analysis

PurposeThere is a striking laterality in the site of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a strong predominance for the right side; however, the impact of primary tumor location on long-term prognosis after hepatectomy of HCC remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effect of primary tumor location on long-term oncological prognosis after hepatectomy for HCC. Patients and methodsData of consecutive patients undergoing curative hepatectomy for HCC between 2008 and 2017 were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of left-sided HCC (LS group) and right-sided HCC (RS group) were compared by using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. COX regression analysis was performed to assess the adjusted effect of tumor location on long-term oncological prognosis. ResultsOf the 2799 included patients, 707 (25.3%) and 2092 (74.7%) were in the LS and RS groups, respectively. Using PSM analysis, 650 matched pairs of patients were created. In the PSM cohort, median OS (66.0 vs. 72.0 months, P = 0.001) and RFS (28.0 vs. 51.0 months, P < 0.001) were worse among patients in the LS group compared to individuals in the RS group. After further adjustment for other confounders using multivariable COX regression analyses, HCC located on the left side remained independently associated with worse OS and RFS. ConclusionTumors located on the left side are associated with poorer OS and RFS after hepatectomy for HCC. Careful surgical options selection and frequent follow-up to improve long-term survival may be justified for HCC patients with left-sided primary tumors.

Comprehensive characterization of KRAS mutations and inter-relation with primary tumor location in colorectal cancers.

231 Background: The recent development of KRAS G12C inhibitors underscores the potential to target KRAS mutations. Right-sided and left-sided colon tumors (RT and LT) exhibit different molecular features. We characterize the prevalence of KRAS-variants, interrelation with primary tumor location, and association with immune biomarkers in CRC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed CRC tumors of all stages (with known sidedness) that underwent NGS with the Tempus xT assay (DNA-seq of 648 genes at 500x coverage, full transcriptome RNA-seq). Bivariate analyses were performed to compare KRAS alterations, immune biomarkers, and co-mutations by tumor location. P-values comparing individual co-mutations between groups were adjusted for false discovery (FDR). Results: A total of 3,391 CRC were analyzed (RT: n = 442 [13%], transverse: n = 116 [3%], LT; n = 2,833 [84%]) of which 1486 (44%) tumors harbored KRAS mutations. Overall, KRAS mutations were more frequent in RT compared to transverse tumors and LT (52% vs 41% vs 43%, p&lt;0.001, respectively). The most frequent KRAS mutation variants observed were G12D (29 %), G12V (22%), G13D (16%), and G12C (5.7%). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of KRAS variant types between LT and RT (p=0.5). Significant differences in genomic co-mutations with various KRAS variants were observed in the following genes: TP53, FBXW7, and NF1 (FDR- P&lt;0.05). RT and transverse tumors were more likely have MSI-H and TMB-H (&gt;10 mut/mb) status than LT (MSI-H: 18% vs 22% vs 2.2% and TMB-H (20% vs 22% vs 3%, P&lt;0.001), respectively. CRC tumors harboring G13D variants were more likely to be associated with and MSI-H and TMB-H status (and 7.7% and 8.5%) compared to G12D (2.8 % and 3.9 %), G12V (1.8 % and 2.1%), and G12C (0% and 2.4%); P = 0.003 and 0.001. Conclusions: The most frequent KRAS mutation variants observed in CRC tumors were G12D, G12V, G13D, and G12C. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of KRAS variant types between tumors of the left vs right colon. CRC tumors that harbored G13D variants were significantly more likely to be associated with MSI-H and TMB-H status. [Table: see text]

Survival and clinical characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer and brain metastases.

29 Background: Brain metastases (BM) are rare in colorectal cancer (CRC) with 1-3% of patients developing BM over their lifetime. There are no screening recommendations for BM in patients with CRC and most are diagnosed after a patient develops symptoms. Identifying the clinical characteristics for patients with CRC and BM may aid clinicians to consider BM early in symptom onset and potentially screen appropriate patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients &gt;18 years diagnosed with CRC and BM at Yale New Haven Hospital from 1/2012-9/2021. Clinical characteristics were analyzed by descriptive statistics, time intervals were compared using the Mann-Whitney test, and survival analysis was done using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We identified 93 patients with CRC and BM. Median age at diagnosis was 56 years, 55% were male, 75% of patients had a left sided primary tumor and 47% were rectal primary. At initial diagnosis, 38% and 39% were stage III and IV respectively. RAS/RAF mutations were present in 45% of patients and all were mismatch repair proficient. The median time from CRC diagnosis to BM was 3.81 years (95% CI 3.09, 4.41) and median time from metastatic CRC to BM was 2.21 years (95% CI 1.48, 2.75). Median overall survival after developing BM was 0.49 years (95% CI 0.24, 0.70). Patients with RAS/RAF mutations had a decreased median time from CRC diagnosis to BM of 3.33 years (95% CI 2.69, 4.37) compared to RAS/RAF wildtype at 5.09 years (95% CI 4.44, 7.97) (p 0.0028). Median time to BM from CRC diagnosis was also decreased in females (p 0.01). The location of primary tumor did not significantly decrease time to BM. Prior to BM diagnosis, 76% of patients had lung metastasis. 84% of patients received treatment for BM while 14% had no BM treatment and 2% were unknown. For treatment 50% had Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, 22% underwent surgical excision +/- adjuvant radiation, and 12% underwent whole brain radiotherapy. After BM treatment, 43% of patients received additional chemotherapy. Conclusions: Although BM in CRC is uncommon, early diagnosis in those at risk is critical given the urgent nature of BM. Patients with CRC that develop BM frequently have tumors that originate in the left side of the colon and preexisting lung metastasis. In patients with CRC and BM, the majority develop BM &gt; 3 years after initial CRC diagnosis, and BM onset is significantly shorter in females and patients with tumors harboring a RAS/RAF mutation. After BM diagnosis and treatment, less than half of patients are able to receive subsequent therapy, and median survival is &lt; 6 months. [Table: see text]

Dose-escalated pancreas radiotherapy for unresected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Patterns of care and survival in the United States.

676 Background: Randomized trials have not shown an overall survival (OS) benefit to adding radiotherapy (RT) to chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC). However, trials such as LAP07 did not incorporate escalated-dose RT (EDR), which may confer longer survival. The adoption of EDR across the United States and associated outcomes are unknown. Methods: We queried the National Cancer Data Base for non-surgically managed patients with LAPC diagnosed between 2004 and 2019. RT with biologically effective doses (BED10) &gt; 70 and ≤ 200 Gy were labeled EDR and conventional-dose RT (CDR) for 39-70 Gy doses. Associations with receipt of EDR and with OS were identified using multivariate analysis (MVA) logistic and Cox regressions, respectively. Bonferroni corrections were applied. Cochran-Armitage and Mann-Kendall trend tests were performed to assess trends in use of RT. Results: Of 64,303 patients, the most common treatments were chemotherapy alone (CT) (71%), chemoradiation (CRT) (27%), and pancreas RT alone (2%). 18,970 patients received pancreas RT, of which 91% was CDR (median dose 50.4 Gy; median 28 fractions) and 9% was EDR (50 Gy; 5 fractions). Use of pancreas RT increased from 14% in 2004 to a peak of 18% in 2010, decreased to a nadir of 13% in 2016, and subsequently increased to 15% by 2019 ( Ptrend &lt; 0.001). EDR use increased from 7% in 2004 to 22% in 2019 ( Ptrend &lt; 0.0001). Median BED10 increased from 53 to 59 Gy ( Ptrend&lt; 0.001). Of patients receiving pancreas RT, use of intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and stereotactic body RT (SBRT) respectively increased from 25% and 2% in 2004 to 60% and 27% in 2019, while use of 3-D conformal RT (3D-CRT) decreased from 64% to 9% ( Ptrend &lt; 0.02 for all comparisons). On MVA logistic regression, primary tumor location in the body/tail vs. head (aOR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.40; P = 0.003) associated with greater EDR receipt, whereas T3-4 vs. T2 disease (aOR 0.81, CI 0.71-0.92; P = 0.002) associated with lesser receipt. At a median follow up of 59.1 months (CI 57.5-61.0), median OS estimates for CDR and EDR were 10.2 months (CI 10.1-10.3) and 13.3 months (CI 13.2-13.5; P &lt; 0.0001), respectively. On MVA Cox regression, N1 vs. N0 disease (HR 1.08, CI 1.06-1.10; P &lt; 0.001) correlated with higher risk of death, whereas CRT vs. CT (HR 0.83, CI 0.81-0.85; P &lt; 0.001) correlated with lower risk of death. Subset MVA of 14,634 CRT patients correlated higher RT dose—as both a categorical variable (EDR vs. CDR; HR 0.84, CI 0.79-0.90; P &lt; 0.001) and continuous variable (BED10; HR 0.994, CI 0.992-0.995; P &lt; 0.001)—with lower risk of death. Conclusions: Fewer than 1 in 6 patients with unresected LAPC received pancreas RT, despite a nominal increase in utilization in recent years. Although retrospective, these NCDB data suggest longer OS with the addition of RT for unresected LAPC, suggesting continued unmet need. EDR is associated with longer survival vs. CDR.

Safety of ramucirumab in patients with advanced gastric cancer in Europe and North America: A prospective observational registry.

341 Background: The objective was to describe the safety of ramucirumab (Ram) for previously treated advanced gastric cancer under real-world conditions in Europe and North America. Methods: This was a non-interventional, descriptive study of adult patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma whose disease had progressed after first-line chemotherapy (I4T-MC-JVDD). Data collection began in December 2015 and was completed in August 2021. Patients were followed up to 12 months after initiation of Ram. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs)/serious AEs (SAEs), and AEs leading to dose adjustment or death. Subgroups of interest were elderly, patients with cardiac comorbidities, hepatic, or renal impairment. Results: 606 patients were classified in 3 cohorts: Ram monotherapy (Ram Mono, N=51); Ram plus paclitaxel (Ram+PTX, N=547); or Ram plus other anti-cancer agents (N=8). Most patients were male (70%), white (97%) and aged ≥65 (55%); 22% of the population was ≥75 years old. Metastatic cancer was reported in 552 patients (96%); primary tumor location was gastric in 417 patients (69%) and in the gastroesophageal junction in 189 patients (31%). Patients were previously treated mainly with platinum (97%) and fluoropyrimidine (96%). Hypertension was the most frequently reported historical medical condition (25%). At baseline, 23% patients had documented cardiac comorbidities, 11% hepatic impairment and 6% renal impairment. The median duration of Ram was 8 weeks (IQR=4.0-10.6) in Ram Mono and 15 weeks (IQR=8.4-26.7) in Ram+PTX. Regardless of causality, 98% of patients experienced ≥1 AE; most commonly fatigue (31%) and abdominal pain (20%) in Ram Mono cohort; and fatigue (46%) and neuropathy (31%) in Ram+PTX cohort. In total, 40% experienced ≥1 AE of special interest; most commonly bleeding/hemorrhage (21% [mainly epistaxis]) and hypertension (11%). In total, 33 patients (5%) died due to AEs that occurred on, or within 90 days of last dose of Ram, 9 (2%) were related to Ram treatment as per physician’s assessment. Conclusions: The observed safety profile of Ram in the real-world setting was manageable and consistent with the established safety profile of Ram identified from clinical trials. No new safety concerns or notable findings were observed overall or in the subgroups of interest. Clinical trial information: ENCEPP/SDPP/9400 . [Table: see text]

Characterization of long-term survivors in the TOPAZ-1 study of durvalumab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer.

531 Background: At the primary analysis of TOPAZ-1 (NCT03875235; data cut-off [DCO] Aug 11, 2021), durvalumab (D) + gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) significantly improved overall survival (OS) vs placebo (PBO) + GC in participants (pts) with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC), with OS curves that separated over time (Oh et al. NEJM Evid 2022), that persisted with further follow-up (DCO Feb 25, 2022; HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.64–0.91]; 18-month OS, 34.8% [D + GC] vs 24.1% [PBO + GC]; Oh et al. Ann Oncol 2022 Abs 56P). We characterized long-term survivors (LTS) in TOPAZ-1. Methods: Pts untreated for unresectable locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic BTC received D (1500 mg every 3 weeks [Q3W]) or PBO, + G (1000 mg/m2) and C (25 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 Q3W, up to 8 cycles, followed by D (1500 mg Q4W) or PBO. Characteristics and outcomes of LTS (pts who survived ≥18 months after randomization; DCO Feb 25, 2022) were assessed. Results: There were more LTS with D + GC vs PBO + GC (Table). Characteristics of LTS were consistent with the full analysis set (FAS, all randomized pts) including age, sex, region, primary tumor location, disease classification (metastatic vs locally advanced) and PD-L1 expression. Recurrent disease was more common than initially unresectable disease in LTS vs FAS. Median exposure to study treatment was 11.3 months (mo; D), 9.7 mo (PBO) and 5.5 mo (GC, both arms) in LTS and 7.3 mo (D), 5.8 mo (PBO) and 5.1 mo (GC, both arms) in FAS. The objective response rate in LTS was greater with D + GC vs PBO + GC (44.3%, D + GC; 33.8%, PBO + GC), and greater for both groups vs FAS (26.7%, D + GC; 18.7%, PBO + GC). A higher proportion of LTS in the PBO + GC group received subsequent anticancer therapy, including immunotherapy, than LTS in the D + GC group. The frequency of treatment-related adverse events leading to discontinuation in LTS was consistent with FAS. Conclusions: In TOPAZ-1, characteristics of LTS were generally consistent with the FAS. Overall, LTS were more common with D + GC; LTS in the PBO + GC group appear to be associated with higher frequency of subsequent treatments, including immunotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03875235 . [Table: see text]

IMbrave151: A phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of atezolizumab with or without bevacizumab in combination with cisplatin plus gemcitabine in patients with untreated, advanced biliary tract cancer.

491 Background: VEGF blockade coupled with cytotoxic chemotherapy can promote an immune-permissive tumor microenvironment that can augment response to PD-L1 inhibition. IMbrave151 (NCT04677504) is a randomized, double-blind, global Phase II study evaluating the efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo), bevacizumab (bev) and cisplatin and gemcitabine (CisGem) as first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC). Methods: Patients with previously untreated aBTC were randomized 1:1 to receive atezo (1200 mg every 3 weeks [q3w]) + bev (15 mg/kg q3w) or placebo + CisGem (cisplatin 25 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8 q3w) for up to 8 cycles, followed by atezo (1200 mg q3w) + bev (15 mg/kg q3w) or placebo until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were stratified by disease status, geographic region and primary tumor location. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), disease control rate and safety. No formal hypothesis testing was performed. Results: In total, 162 patients were randomized to receive either atezo + bev + CisGem (n=79) or atezo + placebo + CisGem (n=83). Median age 63 years, Asia/Rest of World (43/57%), ECOG PS 0/1 (53/48%), intrahepatic/extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder (54/19/27%), and metastatic/locally advanced stage (82/18%). The HR for PFS was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.51, 1.14). Median PFS was 8.4 months for atezo + bev + CisGem and 7.9 months for atezo + placebo + CisGem; the 6-month PFS rates were 78% and 63%, respectively. The confirmed ORR was 24% for atezo + bev + CisGem and 25% for atezo + placebo + CisGem. DOR ≥6 months was 89% for atezo + bev + CisGem vs 47% for atezo + placebo + CisGem. The incidence of Grade 3 or 4 adverse events was 73% and 74% with atezo + bev + CisGem and atezo + placebo + CisGem, respectively. Median OS is not reached. Conclusions: Both combinations of IMbrave151 showed a manageable safety profile. The aggregate of data suggests that combining atezo with bev and chemotherapy may provide clinical benefit in a subset of patients with aBTC. Follow-up is ongoing for OS. Clinical trial information: NCT04677504 .

Predictive and prognostic features of metastatic colorectal cancer arising from the transverse colon: A pooled analysis of the CCTG/AGITG CO.17 and CO.20 randomized trials.

124 Background: Primary tumour location is predictive of anti-EGFR benefit and prognostic in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Transverse colon cancers are often categorized as right sided, but the optimal cut point is unclear. Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG)/Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group ( AGITG) CO.17 compared Cetuximab (Cet) vs. best supportive care (BSC) in mCRC. CCTG/AGITG CO.20 studied the addition of Brivanib Alaninate to Cet in pre-treated KRAS wildtype (WT) mCRC. We investigated the predictive and prognostic features of transverse colon primary location in a pooled cohort from these trials. Methods: Data from patients with RAS WT mCRC from CO.17 and KRAS WT mCRC from CO.20 randomized to cetux were analyzed for treatment outcomes according to location - right, transverse and left. The cecum to transverse colon was considered right sided, while the splenic flexure to rectum was considered left sided. Results: 553 patients were included, 201 (36.3%) from CO.17 and 352 (63.7%) from CO.20. Primary site distribution was: 32 (5.8%) transverse, 101 (18.3%) right and 420 (75.9%) left. On multivariate analysis from 457 (82.6%) patients treated with Cet, left side was associated with superior OS (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.24-0.68, p=0.0006) and PFS (HR, 0.48; 95% CI,0.29-0.79, p=0.004) compared to transverse colon. No significant difference was noted in OS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.41-1.31, p=0.30) and PFS (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.46-1.36, p=0.40) between right side versus transverse colon. Sidedness was not associated with prognostic difference in OS or PFS in the 96 (17.4%) patients receiving BSC alone. Outcomes according to primary site and treatment are shown. Conclusions: Transverse mCRC has comparable prognostic and predictive features to right sided mCRC. In keeping with previous studies, left side was predictive of greater Cet benefit and presented better overall prognosis when single agent Cet was used after 5-FU, oxaliplatin and irinotecan. [Table: see text]

Clinical characteristics and survival trends of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and peritoneal carcinomatosis who receive metastases surgery in a Spanish cohort.

159 Background: Peritoneal metastases in patients with mCRC are commonly associated with poor outcomes. Some of these patients are candidates to undergo metastases surgery, which may result in better prognosis; however, clinical and molecular characteristics of these patients remain uncertain. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 166 patients with mCRC and peritoneal metastases in a tumor registry from 2015 to 2021, analyzing the clinical and molecular characteristics, as well as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients who received peritoneal surgery versus those who did not. Results: From the whole population, 65 patients (39%) underwent peritoneal metastases surgery, and several characteristics were more frequent in this subgroup: ECOG 0 (n = 26, OR 2.75, p = 0,0069), age &amp;lt;65 years (n = 43, OR 2.29, p = 0,0162), absence of hepatic metastases (n = 56, OR 3.31, p = 0,0037), single metastatic location (n = 43, OR 3.48, p = 0,0002), normal CEA levels at diagnosis (n = 33, OR 2.02, p = 0,0455) and BRAF mutation (n = 12, OR 3.32, p = 0,0345). Moreover, these patients received more lines of systemic treatment (2.8 vs 2, p = 0,006) and more metastases surgeries (1.7 vs 0.9, p = 0,000). Significant differences in tumor mutational status regardless of BRAF (KRAS, NRAS, MSI, PI3K and HER2), sex and primary tumor location between groups were not found. PFS was longer in patients receiving metastases surgery (median, 13.68 vs 7.76 months; HR for progression 0.64; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.46 to 0.89; p = 0,009), as well as overall survival (median NR vs 29.53; HR for death 0.39; 95 % CI, 0.25 to 0.60; p = 0,000). Conclusions: In our cohort, patients with mCRC and peritoneal carcinomatosis who underwent metastases surgery had more frequently less than 65 years, ECOG 0, absence of liver metastases, single metastatic location, normal CEA levels at diagnosis and BRAF mutation. Moreover, this subgroup showed better outcomes with a statistically significant increase in PFS and OS.

First-line anti-EGFR or anti-VEGF therapy, tumour sidedness, and survival: Results from the South Australian (SA) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Registry.

42 Background: The anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies panitumumab (Pmab) and cetuximab (Cmab) and the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab (bev) have demonstrated clinical efficacy in mCRC in combination with first-line chemotherapy. Clinical and molecular characteristics, such as primary tumour sidedness, RAS, BRAF and MMR status are prognostic and predictive biomarkers for response to treatment. Our aim was to compare the survival and tumour characteristics of patients receiving first-line chemotherapy and antibody combinations using the SA mCRC Registry. Methods: This real-world registry has collected data from all patients diagnosed with mCRC in SA prospectively since 2006. We identified patients who had received first-line Pmab, Cmab or bev. Survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test to compare outcomes based on primary tumour location. Results: Of the 5537 patients currently entered onto the registry, 1313 with RAS results available had received first-line anti-EGFR/VEGF antibodies and had colon tumour side recorded. The table summarises median overall survival (mOS) and patient characteristics. Survival was significantly shorter for those with right colon cancers (P &lt; 0.001). There were more high-grade (P &lt; 0.001), KRAS mutant (P = 0.004) and BRAF mutant (P = 0.036) tumours in those with right colon cancers, and a trend towards fewer curative liver resections (P = 0.059). There was no significant difference in mOS seen between Pmab, Cmab or bev for both left (P = 0.14) and right-sided (P = 0.88) primary tumours. Conclusions: There were more high-grade, BRAF and KRAS mutant patients with right colon tumours, and lower rates of liver resection, which may explain the significantly shorter mOS. The survival seen for Pmab and Cmab was almost identical for both right and left primary tumours. When comparing Pmab, Cmab and bev as first-line therapy, there was no significant difference in mOS for both left- and right-sided CRC. [Table: see text]

Outcomes by antibiotic use in participants with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with durvalumab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in the phase 3 TOPAZ-1 study.

550 Background: TOPAZ-1 (NCT03875235) is a double-blind, Phase 3 study of durvalumab (D), an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), + gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in participants (pts) with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). D + GC improved overall survival (OS) in pts with advanced BTC versus placebo (PBO) + GC (Oh et al. NEJM Evid 2022). Use of antibiotics during ICI treatment has been correlated with poorer OS and progression-free survival (PFS; Jiang et al. Front Oncol 2022). Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive D (1500 mg) or PBO on Day 1 every 3 weeks (Q3W), + G (1000 mg/m2) and C (25 mg/m2) on Days 1 and 8 Q3W, for ≤8 cycles, followed by D or PBO monotherapy Q4W. This exploratory subgroup analysis of TOPAZ-1 assessed OS and PFS by systemic antibiotic use during the study (≥1 dose 14 days before first D/PBO dose to 14 days after last D/PBO dose). Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using an unstratified Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for disease status (initially unresectable or recurrent) and primary tumor location (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, or gallbladder cancer). Data cut-off at primary analysis was Aug 11, 2021. Results: The number (%) of pts using antibiotics during the study (D + GC, 167/341 [49.0%]; PBO + GC, 167/344 [48.5%]) was similar between treatment arms. In the D + GC arm, median OS (95% CI) was similar regardless of antibiotics use: 12.6 (9.7–14.8) months in pts with antibiotics use vs 13.0 (10.8–14.7) months in pts without (Table). In the PBO + GC arm, median OS (95% CI) was 10.3 (8.7–12.5) in pts with antibiotics use vs 12.1 (11.0–13.8) in pts without. OS HRs (95% CI) in D + GC vs PBO + GC were 0.78 (0.59–1.02) in pts with antibiotics and 0.81 (0.62–1.07) in pts without. Median PFS (95% CI) was 7.3 (6.5–7.7) months in pts with antibiotics use vs 7.2 (5.9–7.4) months in pts without in the D + GC arm and 5.7 (5.4–6.6) months vs 6.1 (5.6–7.3) months, respectively, in the PBO + GC arm (Table). PFS HRs (95% CI) were 0.70 (0.55–0.89) in pts with antibiotics use and 0.82 (0.65–1.03) in pts without. Conclusions: In the TOPAZ-1 study of D in BTC, no meaningful difference was found in OS or PFS for participants who received antibiotics during the study period compared with those who did not, and results were consistent with the primary analysis. These results support that people receiving D may be treated with antibiotics when clinically indicated. Clinical trial information: NCT03875235 . [Table: see text]