Local Recurrence Of Rectal Cancer Research Articles

Pathology reporting of pelvic exenteration specimens for locally recurrent rectal cancer

IntroductionReporting of pelvic exenteration specimens for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) can be challenging for structured pathological analysis and currently, there is a lack of specific guidelines. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of pathology reporting in a cohort of patients who underwent pelvic exenteration for LRRC in a high-volume tertiary unit. Materials and methodsIn a retrospective analysis of histopathology reports of consecutive patients who underwent pelvic exenteration for LRRC from 1996 to 2018, the quality of pathology reporting was assessed using the Structure Reporting Protocol for Colorectal Cancer. The primary endpoint was the completeness of pathology reporting, secondary endpoints were the association between the reporting style (narrative versus synoptic), reporting period (the first half versus the second half), as well as the activity of the pathologists with the completeness of pathology reporting. Results221 patients who underwent pelvic exenteration for LRRC were included into the study. There was a high variability in completeness of pathology reporting within the cohort, ranging from 9.5% to 100%. Notably, microscopic clearance was reported in only 92.4% of the reports. Overall, a significantly higher rate of completeness was observed in synoptic reports when compared to narrative reports and in more recent compared to earlier reports. There was no significant association between the activity of pathologists and the completeness of reporting. ConclusionsThis study shows a significant variability in the quality of reporting in pelvic exenteration for LRRC. The use of synoptic reporting clearly resulted in more complete reports.

Impact of surgical treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer on the quality of life of patients

Objective: To investigate the impact of surgical treatment on quality of life in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). Methods: A descriptive case series study was performed. The complete clinical data of 62 patients who met the diagnostic criteria of LRRC and treated by surgical procedures in Huashan Hospital of Fudan University from January 2012 to November 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. All the patients were followed up at least 12 months. Assessments of urinary function, sexual function, mobility function of lower limb and quality of life were documented. Patients with distant metastasis and surgical history of the urinary system were excluded. According to the criteria of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), recurrence were divided into central (n=27), anterior (n=20), posterior (n=7), and lateral (n=8) subtypes. Baseline characteristics, surgical procedures and short-term complications were analyzed. International prostate symptom score (IPSS) and grade of voiding dysfunction were used to evaluate the urinary function. Higher score of IPSS and higher grade of voiding dysfunction indicated worse voiding function. Sexual function for both genders was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively. International index of erectile function-5 (IIEF-5) was used for assessment of male patients and higher score indicated better function. Female sexual function index (FSFI) was used in females and higher score indicated better function. Short-form health survey with 36 items (SF-36), yielding an 8-scale profile of functional health (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional health and mental health) was used to evaluate the quality of life. The higher score indicated the better quality of life. Results: All the operations of 62 patients completed successfully and R0 resection rate was 88.7% (55/62). Postoperative surgical complications occurred in 16 cases (25.8%), including 3 patients of Clavien-Dindo classification III. At postoperative 3-month, 42 patients without ileum cystectomy or ureterostomy suffered from different grade of voiding dysfunction. IPSS increased significantly after the surgery (before surgery: 12.36±4.75, after surgery: 18.40±4.77, t=-9.128, P<0.001). There was no significant difference among the subtypes (P>0.05). At postoperative 12-month, IIEF-5 decreased from 14 (0~25) to 9 (0~19) in males (Z=-5.174, P<0.001) and FSFI deceased from 8.4 (2.0-27.0) to 2.0 (2.0-18.4) in females (Z=-3.522, P<0.001). Scores of physical functioning and role-physical decreased significantly [physical functioning: before surgery 70 (35-85), after surgery 65 (30-80), Z=-3.685, P<0.001; role-physical: before surgery 50 (0-50), after surgery 25(0-75), Z=-4.065, P<0.001], while those of social functioning role-emotional and mental health increased significantly after the surgery [social functioning: before surgery 44 (22-78), after surgery 56 (0-89), Z=-3.509, P<0.001; role-emotional: before surgery 17 (0-100), after surgery 33 (0-100), Z=-2.439, P=0.015; mental health: before surgery 40 (36-76), after surgery 52 (24-80), Z=-3.395, P<0.001]. All surgical procedures decreased the voiding function of LRRC patients and the sexual function of male patients (all P<0.01). However, only total pelvic exenteration and posterior pelvic exenteration decreased FSFI in female patients [before surgery: 8.4 (2.0-27.0) after surgery: 2.0 (2.0-18.4), Z=-2.810, P=0.005]. Conclusions: Multi-visceral resection in LRRC patients may damage voiding and sexual function. However, successful and effective surgical treatment can improve the psychosocial health of LRRC patients.

Clinical Reality and Treatment for Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Background and Objectives: Despite advances in treatment, local recurrence remains a great concern in patients with rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of local recurrence of rectal cancer in our single center over a 7-year-period. Materials and Methods: Patients with stage I-III rectal cancer were treated with curative intent. The necessity for radiotherapy and chemotherapy was determined before surgery and/or postoperative histopathological results. Results: Of 365 rectal cancer patients, 76 (20.8%) developed recurrent disease. In total, 27 (7.4%) patients presented with a local tumor recurrence (isolated in 40.7% of cases). Radiotherapy was performed in 296 (81.1%) patients. The most often used schema was 5 × 5 Gy followed by immediate surgery (n = 214, 58.6%). Local recurrence occurred less frequently in patients treated with 5 × 5 Gy radiotherapy followed by surgery (n = 9, 4%). Surgical procedures of relapses were performed in 12 patients, six of whom were operated with radical intent. Only two (7.4%) patients lived more than 5 years after local recurrence treatment. The incidence of local recurrence was associated with primary tumor distal location and worse prognosis. The median overall survival of patients after local recurrence treatment was 19 months. Conclusions: Individualized rectal cancer patient selection and systematic treatment algorithms should be used clinical practice to minimize likelihood of relapse. 5 × 5 Gy radiotherapy followed by immediate surgery allows good local control in resectable cT2N+/cT3N0 patients. Radical resection of isolated local recurrence offers the best chances of cure.

The dosimetry evaluation of 3D printing non-coplanar template-assisted CT-guided 125I seed stereotactic ablation brachytherapy for pelvic recurrent rectal cancer after external beam radiotherapy.

ABSTRACTThe aim of this study was to investigate the safety and accuracy of computed tomography (CT)-guided 125I seed implantation assisted by a three-dimensional printing non-coplanar template (3D-PNCT) for treating pelvic locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) patients. A total of 13 patients with 18 masses received 125I seed implantation. The dosimetric parameters of pre-implantation and post-implantation were calculated to evaluate the quality of 125I seed implantation. Doses delivered to the organs at risk (OAR) were also calculated. Differences between pre-implantation and post-implantation were compared by the paired t-test. The mean number of 125I seeds pre-implantation and post-implantation was 67.1 and 68.8, respectively. The mean values of D90 (dose that was delivered to 90% of the target volume), D100 (dose that was delivered to 100% of the target volume), V100 (the target volume receiving 100% of the prescription dose) and V150 (the target volume receiving 150% of the prescription dose) pre-implantation and post-implantation were 136.6 and 135.2 Gy, 63.5 and 71.0 Gy, 90.3% and 90.3% and 62.1% and 62.2%, respectively. Dosimetric outcomes were evaluated quantitatively using the dose volume indices, i.e. coverage index (CI), external volume index (EI) and relative dose homogeneity index (HI). The mean values of those indices pre-implantation and post-implantation were 0.62 and 0.61, 0.31 and 0.33, and 0.31 and 0.31, respectively. The mean doses delivered to OAR pre-implantation and post-implantation for the bladder (D2cc) and bowel (D2cc) were 33.4 and 34.4 Gy, and 58.6 and 61.8 Gy, respectively. The parameters mentioned above fitted well, and no significant difference was found among them. It is concluded that CT-guided 125I seed implantation assisted by 3D-PNCT could be a safe and accurate salvage modality for treating LRRC patients; the ideal pre-prescription dose could be achieved. Also, addition of 3D-PNCT could minimize radiation damage to the surrounding normal tissues.

Impact of a history of metastases or synchronous metastases on survival in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) frequently present with either synchronous metastases or a history of metastases. This study was conducted to evaluate whether LRRC patients without metastases have a different oncological outcome compared to patients with a history of metastases treated with curative intent or patients with potentially curable synchronous metastases. All consecutive LRRC patients who underwent intentionally curative surgery between 2005 and 2017 in a large tertiary hospital were retrospectively reviewed and categorized as having no metastases, a history of (curatively treated) metastases or synchronous metastases. Patients with unresectable distant metastases were excluded from the analysis. Of the 349 patients who were analysed, 261 (75%) had no metastases, 42 (12%) had a history of metastases and 46 (13%) had synchronous metastases. The 3-year metastasis-free survival was 52%, 33% and 13% in patients without metastases, with a history of metastases, and with synchronous metastases, respectively (P<0.001) A history of metastases did not influence overall survival (OS), but there was a trend towards a worse OS in patients with synchronous metastases compared with patients without synchronous metastases (hazard ratio 1.43; 95% CI 0.98-2.11). LRRC patients with a history of curatively treated metastases have an OS comparable to that in patients without metastases and should therefore be treated with curative intent. However, LRRC patients with synchronous metastases have a poor metastasis-free survival and worse OS; in these patients, an individualized treatment approach to observe the behaviour of the disease is recommended.

Age-related differences in morbidity and mortality after surgery for primary clinical T4 and locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Outcomes in elderly patients (≥75years) with non-advanced colorectal cancer have improved. It is unclear whether this is also true for elderly patients with clinical T4 rectal cancer (cT4RC) or locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). We aimed to compare age-related differences in morbidity and mortality after curative treatment for cT4RC and LRRC. All cT4RC and LRRC patients without distant metastasis who underwent curative surgery between 2005 and 2017 in the Catharina Hospital (Eindhoven, The Netherlands) were included. Morbidity and mortality were evaluated based on age (<75 and ≥75years) and date of surgery (2005-2011 and 2012-2017). Overall, 72 of 474 (15.2%) cT4RC and 53 of 293 (18.1%) LRRC patients were ≥75years. Nosignificantdifferences in the incidence of Clavien-Dindo I-IV complications were observed between age groups. However, in elderly cT4RC patients, cerebrovascular accidents occurred more frequently (4.2% vs. 0.5%, P=0.03). Between 2005-2011 and 2012-2017, 30-day mortality improved from 7.5% to 3.1% and from 10.0% to 0.0% in elderly cT4RC and LRRC patients, respectively. The 1-year mortality during 2012-2017 was worse in elderly than in younger patients (28.1% vs. 6.2%, P=0.001 for cT4RC and 27.3% vs. 13.8%, P=0.06 for LRRC). In elderly cT4RC and LRRC patients, 44.4% and 46.2% died due to non-cancer-related causes, while only 27.8% and 23.1% died due to disease recurrence, respectively. Although the 30-day mortality in elderly cT4RC and LRRC patients improved after curative treatment, the 1-year mortality in elderly patients continued to be high, which requires more awareness for the elderly after hospitalization.

Prediction of R0/R+ surgery by different classifications for locally recurrent rectal cancer.

A widely adopted classification system for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) is currently missing, and the indication for surgery is not standardized. To evaluate all the published classification systems in a large monocentric cohort of LRRC patients, assessing their capability to predict a radical (R0) resection. A total of 152 consecutive LRRC patients treated at the National Cancer Institute of Milan (NCIM) from 2009 to 2017 were classified according to Pilipshen, Mayo Clinic, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), Wanebo, Yamada, Boyle, Dutch TME Trial, Royal Marsden and National Cancer Institute of Milan (NCIM) classification systems. Central location of LRRC was significantly predictive of R0 resection across all classification systems. R + resection was predicted by the "anterior" category of MSKCC (OR 2.66, p = 0.007), the "S2b" (OR 3.50, p = 0.04) and the "S3" (OR 2.70, p = 0.01) categories of NCIM, "pelvic disease through anastomosis" of Pilipshen (OR 2.89, p = 0.002), "fixed at 2 sites" of Mayo Clinic (OR 2.68, p = 0.019), and "TR4" of Wanebo (OR 3.39, p = 0.002). The NCIM was the most predictive classification for R0 surgery. The NCIM classification seems to be superior among the others in predicting R0 surgery. Generally, lateral invasive and high sacral invasive relapses are associated with reduced probability of R0 surgery and unfavorable outcomes.

Association of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision With Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer

Proponents of novel transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) suggest the procedure overcomes the technical and oncologic challenges of conventional approaches for treating rectal cancer. Recently, however, there has been controversy regarding the oncologic safety of the procedure. To assess the association of transanal TME with the incidence of local recurrence (LR) of cancer and the probability of remaining free of LR during follow-up. This multicenter cohort study used data from 8 high-volume rectal cancer academic institutions from across Canada on all consecutive patients with primary rectal cancer treated by transanal TME at the participating centers. The study was conducted between January 2014 and December 2018, and data were analyzed from April 1, 2020, to September 15, 2020. Transanal TME. The incidence of LR was reported as a direct measure of quality of resection. The cumulative probability of LR- and systemic recurrence (SR)-free survival at 36 months was estimated. Local recurrence and SR were defined as radiologic or endoscopic evidence of 1 or more new lesions in or outside the pelvis, respectively, documented during surveillance after the removal of the primary tumor. Of 608 total patients included in the analysis, 423 (69.6%) were male; the median age was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR], 54-70 years). Local recurrence was identified in 22 patients (3.6%) after a median follow-up of 27 months (IQR, 18-38 months). The median time to LR was 13 months (IQR, 9-19 months). Sixteen of the 22 patients with LR (72.7%) were male, 14 (63.6%) received neoadjuvant chemoradiation, and 12 (54.5%) had American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III disease. Of those with LR, 16 (72.7%) had a negative circumferential radial margin and 20 (90.9%) had a negative distal resection margin, 2 (9.1%) experienced conversion to open surgery, and 15 (68.2%) also developed SR. The probability of LR-free survival at 36 months was 96% (95% CI, 94%-98%). According to the Cox proportional hazards regression model, the hazard ratio of LR was estimated to be 4.2 (95% CI, 2.9-6.2) times higher among patients with a positive circumferential radial margin than among those with a negative circumferential radial margin. In this cohort study, transanal TME performed by experienced surgeons was associated with an incidence of LR and SR that is in line with the published literature on open and laparoscopic TME, suggesting that transanal TME may be an acceptable approach for management of rectal cancer.

Treatment and subsequent prognosis in locally recurrent rectal cancer: a multicenter retrospective study of 498 patients.

Locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) has a tremendous impact on prognosis as well as the quality of life. Because of the low incidence and various recurrence patterns, the treatment outcome of LRRC is not fully elucidated. The current study aimed to evaluate the prognosis and identify the prognosticators in patients with LRRC. We conducted a multicenter study at 24 hospitals in Japan. Patients with primary rectal cancer who underwent curative resection between 1997 and 2012 and developed local recurrence only as a first recurrent event were recruited. The primary outcome of our study was overall survival (OS) after a diagnosis of LRRC. Four hundred and ninety-eight patients were included in the study. Of these, 213 (42.8%) underwent surgical resection; this was associated with the best 5-year OS rate of 52%, followed by carbon ion/proton therapy (44%). Among LRRC patients, undifferentiated type, T4, high CEA level, and high CA19-9 level were independent prognosticators of OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.83, P = 0.008, HR = 1.54, P = 0.004, HR = 1.35, P = 0.03, and HR = 1.58, P = 0.003, respectively). This large-scale cohort study showed that surgical resection led to a favorable prognosis compared to other treatments for LRRC. Therefore, surgical resection should be considered whenever feasible for LRRC patients. In addition, undifferentiated type, T4, and tumor marker (CEA and CA19-9) elevation were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS among patients with LRRC.

Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone as neoadjuvant treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer: the PelvEx II study

Background: A resection with clear resection margins (R0 resection) is the single most important prognostic factor for overall and local recurrence free survival in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). However, despite the use of neoadjuvant chemo(re)irradiation, an R0 resection is achieved in only ±60% of patients. Induction chemotherapy in addition to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is increasingly being used, as this combination may increase the R0 resection rate. Still, evidence for any beneficial effect of induction chemotherapy is lacking.

Long-Term Outcomes and Prognostic Analysis of Computed Tomography-Guided Radioactive 125I Seed Implantation for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer After External Beam Radiotherapy or Surgery

BackgroundManagement of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) after surgery or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) remains a clinical challenge, given the limited treatment options and unsatisfactory outcomes. This study aimed to assess long-term outcomes of computed tomography (CT)-guided radioactive 125I seed implantation in patients with LRRC and associated prognostic factors.MethodsA total of 101 patients with LRRC treated with CT-guided 125I seed implantation from October 2003 to April 2019 were retrospectively studied. Treatment procedures involved preoperative planning design, 125I seed implantation, and postoperative dose evaluation. We evaluated the therapeutic efficacy, adverse effects, local control (LC) time, and overall survival (OS) time.ResultsAll the patients had previously undergone surgery or EBRT. The median age of patients was 59 (range, 31–81) years old. The median follow-up time was 20.5 (range, 0.89–125.8) months. The median LC and OS time were 10 (95% confidence interval (CI): 8.5–11.5) and 20.8 (95% CI: 18.7–22.9) months, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year LC rates were 44.2%, 20.7%, and 18.4%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates were 73%, 31.4%, and 5%, respectively. Univariate analysis of LC suggested that when short-time tumor response achieved partial response (PR) or complete response (CR), or D90>129 Gy, or GTV ≤ 50 cm3, the LC significantly prolonged (P=0.044, 0.041, and <0.001, respectively). The multivariate analysis of LC indicated that the short-time tumor response was an independent factor influencing LC time (P<0.001). Besides, 8.9% (9/101) of the patients had adverse effects (≥grade 3): radiation-induced skin reaction (4/101), radiation-induced urinary reaction (1/101), fistula (2/101), and intestinal obstruction (2/101). The cumulative irradiation dose and the activity of a single seed were significantly correlated with adverse effects ≥grade 3 (P=0.047 and 0.035, respectively).ConclusionCT-guided 125I seed implantation is a safe and effective salvage treatment for LRRC patients who previously underwent EBRT or surgery. D90 and GTV significantly influenced prognosis of such patients.

The clinical relevance of indeterminate lung nodules in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer

AimTo evaluate the clinical relevance of indeterminate lung nodules (ILN) in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) treated in a tertiary referral centre. MethodsAll patients with LRRC diagnosed between 2000 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Reports of staging chest CT-scans were evaluated for ILN. Patients with distant metastases including lung metastases at time of LRRC diagnosis were excluded. Overall (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and the cumulative incidence of lung metastases were compared between patients with and without ILN. ResultsIn total 556 patients with LRRC were treated during the study period. In the 243 patients eligible for analysis, 68 (28%) had ILN at LRRC diagnosis. Median OS was 37 months for both the patients with and without ILN (p = 0.37). Median PFS was 14 months for the patients with ILN and 16 months for patients without ILN (p = 0.80). After correction for potential confounding, ILN present at LRRC diagnosis was not associated with impaired OS or PFS (adjusted hazards ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.81 [0.54–1.22] and 1.09 [0.75–1.59]). The 5-year cumulative incidence of lung metastases was 31% in patients with ILN and 28% in patients without ILN (p = 0.19). ConclusionOur study shows that ILN are present in roughly a quarter of patients with LRRC. No differences in OS, PFS, or the cumulative incidence of lung metastases were found between patients with and without ILN at LRRC diagnosis. These results suggest that ILN are of little to no clinical relevance in patients with LRRC.

Endorectal Ultrasound in Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Local recurrence (LR) of rectal cancer (RC) has a disease-free survival rate of up to 50% if diagnosed early. Endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) is an outpatient procedure that can be used together with rectal digital examination for patient follow-up. This is the first study to determine the diagnostic test accuracy of ERUS in the detection of LR after RC and whether it is a good follow-up method. Three authors independently searched MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov databases and included relevant original studies based on strict inclusion/ exclusion criteria. 3220 articles were identified. After reading the abstracts, 50 articles were selected, out of which 22 were deemed suitable for study inclusion, comprising 3737 patients, which were followed for 59,72 -16,4 months. Based on the available data, sensitivity of ERUS was 88,3% (CI 84,6 - 91,3%), specificity was 94,3 % (CI 92,7 - 95,5%) and diagnostic odds ratio of ERUS was 271,88 (CI 76,998 - 960,04), with ERUS being the only diagnosis method to detect LR in 40 - 12%. Area under the curve for ERUS was 0,9723 - 0,0131. LR after curative treatment of RC in our study was 15 - 2,99%. Concluding, ERUS seems to be a good and efficient follow-up method for diagnosing RC LR.

Dosimetric comparison of computed tomography-guided iodine-125 seed implantation assisted with and without three-dimensional printing non-coplanar template in locally recurrent rectal cancer: a propensity score matching study.

PurposeTo compare post-implant dosimetric parameters of computed tomography (CT)-guided radioactive iodine-125 (125I) seed (RIS) implantation assisted with and without three-dimensional printing non-coplanar template (3D-PNCT) in locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC).Material and methodsOne hundred and fifty-five LRRC patients treated by CT-guided RIS implantation assisted with or without 3D-PNCT from October 2003 to May 2019 were included in this study. Propensity score matching (PSM) method (1 : 1) was used to adjust for differences between the 3D-group (with 3D-PNCT) and the CT-group (without 3D-PNCT). After PSM, dosimetric parameters [D90 (dose that covered 90% of target volume), D100 (dose that covered 100% of target volume), V100 (percentage of gross tumor volume (GTV) receiving 100% of prescription dose), V150 (percentage of GTV receiving 150% of prescription dose), HI (homogeneity index), CI (conformity index), and EI (external index)] of the two groups were compared.ResultsAfter PSM, 45 pairs of matched cases were selected for analysis and differences in variables between the two groups were balanced. For the 3D-group, median values of D90, D100, V100, V150, EI, and HI were 142.6 Gy (73.7-218.2 Gy), 73.7 Gy (26.2-169.3 Gy), 94.1% (74.3-100%), 71.8% (35.4-98.3%), 0.7 (0.1-30.7), and 0.20 (0-0.60), respectively, and corresponding values were 119.9 Gy (39.8-159.3 Gy), 47.0 Gy (13.0-200.9 Gy), 89.9% (38.6-100%), 62.8% (14.8-100%), 0.39 (0-11.01), and 0.30 (0-0.95), respectively, for the CT-group. Parameters including D90, D100, V100, V150, and EI in the 3D-group were significantly higher than those in the CT-group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.006, respectively).Conclusions3D-PNCT can improve the accuracy of radioactive seed implantation by increasing the dose delivered to the tumor and reducing the number of “cold” spots of dose.

MRI-Based Radiomics of Rectal Cancer: Assessment of the Local Recurrence at the Site of Anastomosis

To investigate the significance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics model in differentiating local recurrence of rectal cancer from nonrecurrence lesions at the site of anastomosis. A total of 80 patients with clinically suspected lesions of anastomosis underwent 3.0T pelvic MRI consisting of T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted volume interpolated body examination (VIBE) imaging. Radiomics features were extracted from volumes of interest (VOIs), delineated manually on multiple MRI sequences. Subsequently, principal component analysis reduced the dimensionality of features for T2WI, DWI, VIBE, and combined multisequences, respectively. On this basis, the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) classifier was trained to build ModelT2WI, ModelDWI, ModelVIBE, and Modelcombination. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to determine the diagnostic performance of various models. Principal component analysis selected eight, four, seven, and six principal components to construct the radiomics model for T2WI, DWI, VIBE, and combined multisequences, respectively. Modelcombination had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.864, with sensitivity and specificity of 81.82% and 75.86% in the validation set, demonstrating a more optimal performance compared to other models (p< 0.05). The decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical usefulness of the model. This study demonstrated that MRI-based radiomics is a sophisticated and noninvasive tool for accurately distinguishing LR from nonrecurrence lesions at the site of anastomosis. Combining multiple sequences significantly improves its performance.

&lt;p&gt;Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Different Treatment Modes for Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer&lt;/p&gt;

ObjectiveOptimal approaches to patients with local recurrence of rectal cancer are unclear in China. This study aimed to evaluaty -30te the clinical outcomes and toxicity associated with different treatment regimens for patients with local recurrence of rectal cancer.MethodsA retrospective chart review of patients with local recurrence of rectal cancer and previous radical surgical treatment between March 2010 and December 2017 with curative intent was performed. Disease-related endpoints included treatment progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan–Meier method. Toxicities were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, and complications were scored according to the Clavien-Dindo classification.ResultsA total of 71 patients met the inclusion criteria in this study. The recurrence sites were mainly local recurrence in the pelvic cavity and regional lymph node metastasis. Twenty patients received chemoradiotherapy combined with surgery, 10 underwent surgery alone, and others received chemoradiotherapy-alone (n = 27) and chemotherapy-alone (n = 14) treatment. A clear difference was found in PFS between surgery/chemoradiotherapy with surgery and chemoradiotherapy/chemotherapy groups (26.6 months vs 14.1 months, P = 0.033). The PFS of patients in the surgery combined with chemoradiotherapy, surgery alone, and chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy groups was 65.2 months, 20.2 months, and 14.2 months, respectively (P = 0.042). The multivariate analysis of PFS demonstrated that surgery was an independent factor. The proportion of patients with distant metastases after chemoradiotherapy/chemotherapy was higher than that of patients undergoing surgery (36.6% vs 21.4%, P = 0.179). The OS of patients in the surgery combined with chemoradiotherapy, surgery alone, and chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy groups was 89.4 months, 66.0 months, and 62.8 months, respectively (P = 0.189). Radiation treatment and surgery did not increase extra severe toxicities.ConclusionSurgery combined with chemoradiotherapy was a beneficial treatment mode for managing patients with locally recurrent, nonmetastatic rectal cancer. It was associated with better local disease control, no increase in toxicity, and prolonged survival among patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer.

Pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and local recurrent primary rectal cancer: a 5 years Asian retrospective cohort study and lessons to learn

Background: Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and local recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) were deemed incurable, but with surgical advancement, pelvic exenteration has emerged as a curative option. Although colorectal cancer cases are common, pelvic exenterations are limited to several centres in Malaysia. The study aimed to determine the outcomes of pelvic exenteration from the centre in terms of complete resection, local recurrence rate, mortality rate and complications rate.Methods: Retrospective data collection was done for pelvic exenteration surgeries of LARC and LRRC from year 2014 till 2018 in a Malaysian tertiary referral centre. Demographic data, types of pelvic exenteration, postoperative complications, postoperative histopathology for complete resection (R0) and local recurrence were collected from the hospital medical records.Results: From 2014 till 2018, 51 cases of pelvic exenteration were done, with a mean age of 55.8±12.4 years and predominance of male gender (55%). Thirty-four cases (66.7%) completed the exenteration. A mere 24 cases (47.1%) had complete preoperative imaging of computed tomography (CT scan), pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) scan. R0 resection was achieved in 23 cases (67.6%). Complications were found in 44.8% of patients including anastomotic leak, collection, surgical site infection or cardiac/lung complications. The 30-days postoperative mortality rate is 3.9%. The six-months local recurrence rate was 5.8% and one-year local recurrence rate was 7.8%.Conclusion: Pelvic MRI and PET-CT scan is suggested to be compulsory for all pelvic exenteration candidates to ensure a good outcome. Multidisciplinary team approach is needed preoperatively to discuss the feasibility of pelvic exenteration to optimise the outcomes of this surgery.

The role of surgery for locally recurrent and second recurrent rectal cancer with metastatic disease

BackgroundThe role of surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) with resectable distant metastases or second LRRC remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the influence of synchronous distant metastases (SDMs), a history of distant metastasis resection (HDMR), and a second LRRC on the outcome. MethodsThe long-term outcomes of 70 surgically treated patients with LRRC between 2006 and 2018 were compared by SDM (n = 10), HDMR (n = 17), and second LRRC (n = 7). ResultsAmong the 10 patients with SDM, 4 patients underwent simultaneous resection, whereas the other 6 underwent staged resection with distant first approach. Recurrence developed in 9 patients, of which 2 patients with liver re-resection achieved long-term survival without cancer. The patients with and without SDM had equivalent 5-year overall survival rate (40.5% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.519); however, patients with SDM had a worse 3-year recurrence-free survival rate than those without SDM (10.0% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.031). Multivariate analysis showed that primary non-sphincter-preserving surgery, second LRRC, and R1 resection were independent risk factors for overall survival. Similarly, primary non-sphincter-preserving surgery, second LRRC, SDM, and R1 resection were risk factors for recurrence-free survival. ConclusionsPatients with SDM might still be suitable to undergo salvage surgery and achieve favourable overall survival. Distant metastasectomy should be performed first, followed by a sufficient interval to avoid unnecessary LRRC resection in uncurable patients. An HDMR should not be taken into consideration when making surgical plans. Surgical indication of second LRRC should be strict, especially in referred patients.

Neoadjuvant (re)chemoradiation for locally recurrent rectal cancer: Impact of anatomical site of pelvic recurrence on long-term results

BackgroundSelection criteria to propose neoadjuvant (re)chemoradiation (CHRT) in locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) are required, since re-irradiation is sometimes associated to severe adverse effects. Aim of the present study was to compare chances of R0 surgery and disease-free survival (DFS) in LRRC patients (pts) treated by neoadjuvant (re)CHRT followed by surgery vs. upfront surgery, stratifying pts by each localization of LRRC. MethodsLRRC pts treated at the National Cancer Institute of Milan (Italy) were retrospectively divided into two groups: neoadjuvant (re)CHRT vs. upfront surgery. According to our Milan classification, LRRC were categorized as S1, if located centrally (S1a-b) or anteriorly (S1c) within the pelvis; S2, in case of sacral involvement; S3, in case of lateral pelvic wall infiltration. Results152 pts were candidate for multimodal treatment: 49 (32.2%) by neoadjuvant (re)CHRT and surgery, including 33 re-irradiations, vs. 103 (67.8%) by upfront surgery. No difference was observed in R0 resection rates (respectively 47.6% vs. 51.0%). However, neoadjuvant (re)CHRT followed by surgery improved the DFS (p = 0.028), also in R1 procedures (p = 0.013), compared with upfront surgery. At multivariate analysis, the R+ surgery (p < 0.0001) strongly predicted unfavorable DFS, while neoadjuvant (re)CHRT followed by surgery was independently associated to better DFS (p = 0.0197). Stratifying by LRRC localization, the combined approach significantly improved DFS in the S1c (p = 0.029) and S2 (p = 0.004) subgroups compared to upfront surgery, but not in S1a-b and S3 pts. ConclusionAnterior (S1c) and sacral-invasive (S2) pelvic recurrences significantly benefit in terms of DFS by combination of neoadjuvant (re)CHRT and radical surgery, also after R1 resection.

Survival outcomes after isolated local recurrence of rectal cancer and risk analysis affecting its resectability.

This study aimed to investigate the clinical course and prognostic factors after isolated local recurrence (iLR) and to identify the predictive factors for R0 resection of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 76 patients with iLR who had undergone radical surgery for a primary tumor from 2003 to 2015. The iLR rate was 2.5%. From 76 patients, 39 patients underwent R0 resection for iLR. Multivariate analysis revealed that initial open surgery, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, and p/ypT ≥ 3 were poor prognostic factors after iLR as regard to the variables related to the primary tumor; and symptom presence at the time of iLR diagnosis, higher fixity, and no chemotherapy after iLR were associated with shorter overall survival after iLR, and R0 resection of LRRC was the only favorable prognostic factor for progression-free survival after iLR as regard to the variables related to LRRC. Higher tumor level, negative pathologic circumferential margin of the primary tumor, and low fixity of LRRC were favorable factors in achieving R0 resection of LRRC. Early detection of iLR before symptom development, use of chemotherapy after iLR and R0 resection of LRRC should be considered to improve survival outcomes after iLR.