<b>Objectives:</b> Cervical cancer is a leading cause of global cancer mortality. Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) suffer nearly 90% of the disease burden; this is largely due to the unavailability of technologies for cervical cancer treatment. A local ablation is a promising option for patients with recurrent localized cervical cancer who are not surgical candidates and progress despite systemic therapy and radiation. We developed a low-cost polymer-assisted ethanol ablative therapy, ethyl-cellulose ethanol (ECE) ablation, which overcomes the main shortcoming of traditional ethanol ablation: off-target ethanol leakage. The effectiveness of ECE ablation has been previously demonstrated in pre-clinical head and neck and breast cancer models. Here, we investigated the effects of paclitaxel, either locally or systemically administered, and local ablation with ECE in a preclinical model of cervical cancer. <b>Methods:</b> A syngeneic cervicovaginal tumor model was established in C57BL/6 mice using TC1-Luc, HPV16 E6/E7+ cells expressing luciferase. To determine whether ECE enhances the antitumor effect of paclitaxel, tumor-bearing mice were randomized for treatment with systemic intraperitoneal paclitaxel (P<sub>ip</sub>) alone, local intratumoral paclitaxel (P<sub>it</sub>) alone, P<sub>ip</sub> + ECE, or P<sub>it</sub> + ECE therapy (<i>n</i> = 5 per group). Tumors were monitored with calipers and bioluminescence imaging via a Perkin-Elmer <i>in vivo</i> imaging system (IVIS); tumors were imaged on days 1, 2, 3, 7, and 14. Paclitaxel therapy was administered one day prior to ECE at a 20 mg/kg dose either intraperitoneally or intratumorally. ECE was performed via intratumoral injection of 100 µL ethanol ethyl cellulose under IVIS image guidance. Mice were monitored until day 60 at the end of the study. Fig. 1 <b>Results:</b> Representative IVIS images of TC-1 Luc tumors treated with ECE + P<sub>ip</sub>, ECE+ P<sub>it</sub>, P<sub>ip</sub>, and P<sub>it</sub> on days 1 (pre-treatment), 7, and 14 post-implantation are shown in Figure 1A. Tumor growth measured by total radiance intensity (integral of light signal intensity throughout the tumor area) showed that both ECE + P<sub>ip</sub> and ECE + P<sub>it</sub> had significantly decreased tumor growth compared to P<sub>ip</sub>, and P<sub>it</sub> groups, as shown in Figure 1B (p < 0.05). Overall, mice treated with ECE + P<sub>it</sub> performed best with significantly lower total radiance compared to ECE + P<sub>ip</sub>, P<sub>ip</sub>, and P<sub>it</sub> groups. Mice in the ECE + P<sub>ip</sub>, ECE+ P<sub>it</sub>, P<sub>ip</sub>, and P<sub>it</sub> groups were observed until tumor burden was reached or the end of the study (day 60). Tumor volumes were significantly decreased in both ECE + P<sub>ip</sub> and ECE + P<sub>it</sub> compared to P<sub>ip</sub> and P<sub>it</sub> groups, as shown in Figure 1C. Additionally, mice treated with the ECE + P<sub>it</sub> group lived significantly longer than ECE + P<sub>ip</sub>, P<sub>ip</sub>, and P<sub>it</sub> groups. Survival was significantly improved with P<sub>it</sub> compared to P<sub>ip</sub> and with ECE + P<sub>it</sub> compared to ECE + P<sub>ip</sub> (p < 0.05). Mice treated with ECE + P<sub>ip</sub> lived significantly longer than mice treated with P<sub>ip</sub> (p < 0.05), as shown in Figure 1D. At the end of the study, fewer mice had tumors detectable via IVIS after treatment in the ECE + P<sub>it</sub> (1 out of 5 mice), compared to ECE + P<sub>ip</sub> (5 out of 5 mice), P<sub>ip</sub> (5 out of 5 mice), and P<sub>it</sub> (5 out of 5 mice) groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> The antitumor effect of paclitaxel is enhanced when paired with ECE ablation in a pre-clinical model of HPV-positive cancer. This proof-of-concept study lays the groundwork for future translational work using paclitaxel in combination with ECE ablation to increase the accessibility of low-cost treatment for recurrent cervical cancer.
Read full abstract