Local-regional Control Research Articles

Lower disease control rates and survival outcomes among Blacks with pharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas compared with Whites: a retrospective analysis at the University of Florida

Disparate clinical outcomes for pharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) of the oropharynx (OPSCC) and hypopharynx (HPSCC) have been observed in Black compared with White patients. Higher tobacco and alcohol use has been associated with decreased survival in Black patients with PSCC. Higher human papilloma virus (HPV) infection rates, associated with specific subsites of the oropharynx, are linked to improved overall survival (OS). Using an institutional cohort of Black and White patients with PSCC, we performed a retrospective analysis using multiple disease endpoints including local control (LC), local-regional control (LRC), freedom from distant metastases (DMFS), OS,cause-specific survival (CSS), and recorded tobacco and alcohol use. 1419 patients [Black (n = 111) and White (n = 1,308)] treated for PSCC from 1973 to 2013 were evaluated. PSCC 5- and 10-year LC, LRC, and DMFS and CSS rates were lower for Blacks. Notably, Black patients with OPSCC had higher stage cancers, higher percentage of soft palate tumors, and lower percentage of base of tongue cancers, were more likely to receive radiotherapy, and hadhigher tobacco and alcohol use. OS was significantly lower in Black patients at both anatomic sites, with the greatest difference observed for OPSCC. Multivariate analysis showed race and tobacco independently predicted DMFS, OS, and CSS; however, tobacco use had a greater impact on DMFS (HR 2.5, p = 0.021) than race (HR 1.9, p = 0.027). Overall, we propose that the higher burden of tobacco use along with a lower rate of tumors arising from traditional HPV-related subsites were important contributors to disparate disease outcomes seen in our Black patients.

The Potential Impact and Usability of the Eighth Edition TNM Staging Classification in Oral Cavity Cancer

AimsIn the current eighth edition head and neck TNM staging, extranodal extension (ENE) is an adverse feature in oral cavity squamous cell cancer (OSCC). The previous seventh edition N1 with ENE is now staged as N2a. Seventh edition N2+ with ENE is staged as N3b in the eighth edition. We evaluated its potential impact on patients treated with surgery and postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Materials and methodsOSCC patients treated with primary surgery and adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy between January 2005 and December 2014 were reviewed. Cohorts with pathological node-negative (pN–), pathological node-positive without ENE (pN+_pENE–) and pathological node-positive with ENE (pN+_pENE+) diseases were compared for local control, regional control, distant control and overall survival. The pN+ cohorts were further stratified into seventh edition N-staging subgroups for outcomes comparison. ResultsIn total, 478 patients were evaluated: 173 pN–; 159 pN+_pENE–; 146 pN+_pENE+. Outcomes at 5 years were: local control was identical (78%) in all cohorts (P = 0.892), whereas regional control was 91%, 80% and 68%, respectively (P < 0.001). Distant control was 97%, 87%, 68% (P < 0.001) and overall survival was 75%, 53% and 39% (P < 0.001), respectively. Overall survival for N1 and N2a subgroups was not significantly different. In the seventh edition N2b subgroup of pENE– (n = 79) and pENE+ (n = 79) cohorts, overall survival was 67% and 37%, respectively. In the seventh edition N2c subgroups, overall survival for pENE– (n = 17) and pENE+ (n = 38) cohorts was 65% and 35% (P = 0.08), respectively. Overall, an additional 128 patients (42% pN+) were upstaged as N3b. ConclusionsWhen eighth edition staging was applied, stage migration across the N2–3 categories resulted in expected larger separations of overall survival by stage. Patients treated with primary radiation without surgical staging should have outcomes carefully monitored. Strategies to predict ENE preoperatively and trials to improve the outcomes of pENE+ patients should be explored.

Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A 12-Year, Single-Institution Experience.

PurposeTo characterize our experience and the disease control and toxicity of proton therapy (PT) for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).Patients and MethodsClinical outcomes for patients with HNC treated with PT at our institution were prospectively collected in 2 institutional review board–approved prospective studies. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient characteristics and outcomes. Overall survival, local-regional control, and disease-free survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Treatment-related toxicities were recorded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03) scale.ResultsThe cohort consisted of 573 patients treated from February 2006 to June 2018. Median patient age was 61 years. Oropharynx (33.3%; n = 191), paranasal sinus (11%; n = 63), and periorbital tissues (11%; n = 62) were the most common primary sites. Patients with T3/T4 or recurrent disease comprised 46% (n = 262) of the cohort. The intent of PT was definitive in 53% (n = 303), postoperative in 37% (n = 211), and reirradiation in 10% (n = 59). Median dose was 66 Gy (radiobiological equivalent). Regarding systemic therapy, 43% had received concurrent (n = 244), 3% induction (n = 19), and 15% (n = 86) had both. At a median follow-up of 2.4 years, 88 patients (15%) had died and 127 (22%) developed disease recurrence. The overall survival, local-regional control, and disease-free survival at 2 and 5 years were, respectively, 87% and 75%, 87% and 78%, and 74% and 63%. Maximum toxicity (acute or late) was grade 3 in 293 patients (51%), grade 2 in 234 patients (41%), and grade 1 in 31 patients (5%). There were 381 acute grade 3 and 190 late grade 3 unique toxicities across 212 (37%) and 150 (26%) patients, respectively. There were 3 late-grade 4 events across 2 patients (0.3%), 2 (0.3%) acute-grade 5, and no (0%) late-grade 5 events.ConclusionsThe overall results from this prospective study of our initial decade of experience with PT for HNC show favorable disease control and toxicity outcomes in a multidisease-site cohort and provide a reference benchmark for future comparison and study.

Proton Beam Therapy for Head and Neck Carcinoma of Unknown Primary: Toxicity and Quality of Life.

PurposeProton radiation therapy (PRT) may offer dosimetric and clinical benefit in the treatment of head and neck carcinoma of unknown primary (HNCUP). We sought to describe toxicity and quality of life (QOL) in patients with HNCUP treated with PRT.Patients and MethodsToxicity and QOL were prospectively tracked in patients with HNCUP from 2011 to 2019 after institutional review board approval. Patients received PRT to the mucosa of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and bilateral cervical lymph nodes with sparing of the larynx and hypopharynx. Patient-reported outcomes were tracked with the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory–Head and Neck Module, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Head and Neck, the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory, and the Xerostomia-Related QOL Scale. Primary study endpoints were the incidence of grade ≥ 3 (G3) toxicity and QOL patterns.ResultsFourteen patients (median follow-up, 2 years) were evaluated. Most patients presented with human papillomavirus–positive disease (n = 12, 86%). Rates of G3 oral mucositis, xerostomia, and dermatitis were 7% (n = 1), 21% (n = 3), and 36% (n = 5), respectively. None required a gastrostomy. During PRT, QOL was reduced relative to baseline and recovered shortly after PRT. At 2 years after PRT, the local regional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 100% (among 7 patients at risk), 79% (among 6 patients at risk), and 90% (among 7 patients at risk), respectively.ConclusionTherefore, PRT for HNCUP was associated with highly favorable dosimetric and clinical outcomes, including minimal oral mucositis, xerostomia, and dysphagia. Toxicity and QOL may be superior with PRT compared with conventional radiation therapy and PRT maintains equivalent oncologic control. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate late effects and cost-effectiveness.

Passively Scattered Proton Therapy for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer with Clinical Perineural Invasion

PurposeTo report our experience with the delivery of passively scattered proton therapy in the management of nonmelanoma skin cancers with clinical perineural invasion.Materials and MethodsWe reviewed the medical records of patients who received definitive or postoperative proton therapy for nonmelanoma skin cancer with clinical perineural invasion at our institution and updated patient follow-up when possible. All patients were treated with curative intent with or without the delivery of concurrent systemic therapy. We report disease control rates and the rates of late toxicity among this cohort.ResultsTwenty-six patients treated between 2008 and 2017 were included in the analysis. Following proton therapy, the 3-year overall, cause-specific, and disease-free survival rates were 59%, 73%, and 60%, respectively. The 3-year local control, local regional control, and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 80%, 65%, and 96%, respectively. On univariate analysis, surgical resection before radiation therapy significantly improved local regional control rates at 3 years (55% versus 86%; P = .04). Grade 3+ late toxicities occurred in 13 patients (50%) and the most common toxicities included grade 3+ keratitis of the ipsilateral eye, which occurred in 4 patients (15%) and grade 3+ brain necrosis in 4 patients (15%).ConclusionProton therapy is effective in the management of nonmelanoma skin cancer with clinical perineural invasion. Although disease control and complication rates compare favorably to those previously published for photon-based radiation therapy, the risk for late toxicity is significant and patients should be appropriately counseled.

Long-term Outcomes from Proton Therapy for Sinonasal Cancers.

PurposeTo report long-term disease control, survival, and toxicity after proton therapy for sinonasal cancer.Patients and MethodsWe reviewed 143 cases of adults with nonmetastatic sinonasal cancers treated with primary (18%; n = 26) or adjuvant (82%; n = 117) proton therapy. The most common histologies were squamous cell carcinoma (29%; n = 42), olfactory neuroblastoma (23%; n = 33), and adenoid cystic carcinoma (16%; n = 23). Patients had predominantly advanced-stage disease (T3, 24%, n = 35; T4, 66%, n = 94) and high-grade histology (52%; n = 74). Surgery included endoscopic resection alone (50%) with craniotomy (10%) or open resection (40%), and 31% had gross disease present at radiotherapy. Most (91%) received high-dose (median, 73.6 Gy radiobiological equivalent [GyRBE]; 84% >70 GyRBE) passive-scatter proton therapy using accelerated hyperfractionation (1.2 GyRBE twice daily) and concurrent chemotherapy (70%). Univariate and multivariate models assessed prognostic factors. Grade 3+ toxicities were recorded per Common Terminology Criteria, version 4. Median follow-up was 3.4 years (range, 0.1–12.5 years) overall and 4.9 years (range, 0.9–12.5 years) for living patients.ResultsThe 5-year outcomes were as follows: local control (LC), 80%; neck control, 96%; local-regional control, 78%; freedom from distant metastases, 71%; and disease-free survival, 62%; cause-specific survival, 64%; and overall survival, 59%. Surgery improved LC, but only with gross total resection (5-year LC 87% versus subtotal resection 62.9%, and biopsy alone 55% (P < 0.001). Gross residual disease was the only significant prognostic factor for local-regional control on multivariate analysis. High-grade, T4, and local recurrence were associated with decreased overall survival. Late (G3+) toxicity occurred in 22% (32 of 143), including central nervous system necrosis and vision loss in 6% (9 of 143) and 3.5% (5 of 143), respectively.ConclusionProton therapy after gross-total resection provides excellent long-term LC in patients with locally advanced, high-grade sinonasal cancer. Moreover, LC remains strongly associated with long-term survival. With gross disease, about 60% of patients had long-term LC with proton therapy and induction or concurrent chemotherapy.

The Biological Basis for Enhanced Effects of Proton Radiation Therapy Relative to Photon Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) often present as local-regionally advanced disease at diagnosis, for which a current standard of care is x-ray–based radiation therapy, with or without chemotherapy. This approach provides effective local regional tumor control, but at the cost of acute and late toxicity that can worsen quality of life and contribute to mortality. For patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)–associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in particular, for whom the prognosis is generally favorable, de-escalation of the radiation dose to surrounding normal tissues without diminishing the radiation dose to tumors is desired to mitigate radiation-related toxic effects. Proton radiation therapy (PRT) may be an excellent de-escalation strategy because of its physical properties (that eliminate unnecessary radiation to surrounding tissues) and because of its biological properties (including tumor-specific variations in relative biological effectiveness [RBE] and linear energy transfer [LET]), in combination with concurrent systemic therapy. Early clinical evidence has shown that compared with x-ray–based radiation therapy, PRT offers comparable disease control with fewer and less severe treatment-related toxicities that can worsen the quality of life for patients with HNSCC. Herein, we review aspects of the biological basis of enhanced HNSCC cell response to proton versus x-ray irradiation in terms of radiation-induced gene and protein expression, DNA damage and repair, cell death, tumor immune responses, and radiosensitization of tumors.

Initial Experience with Proton Beam Therapy for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

PurposeExternal beam radiotherapy is used in a subset of high-risk patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Recurrent, radioactive iodine (RAI)–refractory DTC carries a poor prognosis. We report our initial experience of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for recurrent, RAI-refractory DTC.Patients and MethodsFourteen patients with recurrent, RAI-refractory DTC were consecutively treated with IMPT from November 2016 to March 2020 at our multisite institution. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were recorded. Overall survival and local-regional recurrence-free survival were recorded and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Acute and late treatment-related toxicities were recorded based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Head and Neck Module at baseline and after IMPT. Eleven patients were included in the final analysis.ResultsMedian follow-up was 8 months (range, 3-40) for all patients. Median age at treatment with IMPT was 64 years (range, 40-77), and the majority were men (64%). Recurrent histologies included papillary (55%), Hurthle cell (36%), and poorly differentiated (9%) carcinoma; 1 patient had tall cell variant. Concurrent chemotherapy was not administered for any patient in this cohort. At 8 months, all patients were alive without local-regional failure. Acute grade 3 toxicities were limited to 1 patient with dysphagia, requiring feeding tube placement. Two patients experienced late grade 3 esophageal stenosis requiring dilation. There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. There were no differences in pretreatment versus posttreatment patient-reported outcomes in terms of dysphagia or hoarseness.ConclusionIn our early experience, IMPT provided promising local-regional control for recurrent, RAI-refractory DTC. Further study is warranted to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of IMPT in this patient population.

Survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) results after induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by de-escalated chemoradiotherapy (RDCRT) for locally advanced (LA) HPV positive oropharynx cancer (HPVOPC.

6058 Background: HPVOPC has a significantly better prognosis and survival than HPV negative cancer resulting in overtreatment with significant acute and late toxicities and mortality. Radiation therapy is the single greatest determinant of toxicity. Studies to support reduction of radiation dose are a high priority. IC improves local regional control, reduces distant metastases, and may support radiotherapy de-escalation. Patients with T4, ECE, and N2c disease have poorer local regional control (LRC) and a higher rate of distant metastases (DM) and may be suitable for this option. Methods: Data was combined for the experimental arm of a previously reported Phase 3 trial (12 subjects, NCT01706939) and a continuation Phase 2 trial (20 subjects, NCT02945631). After informed consent subjects who were PCR+ HPVOPC, smoked &lt; 20 py, and were LA or functionally unresectable were treated with Taxotere, cisplatin and reduced 5-fluorouracil (mTPF) for 3 cycles and then assessed for response. Responders were treated with 5600 cGy and weekly carboplatin, and then followed for LRC, DM, PFS, OAS and toxicity. Data was analyzed as of 2/1/21. 85% LRC at 3 years was considered non inferior to standard of care chemoradiotherapy. An acceptable end point was predetermined to be 80% PFS and 85% LRC at 3 years in this LA population. Results: 32 subjects were entered and included in the analysis, all responded to IC and had RDCRT. 2 patients with non-HPV16 subtypes were initially entered, treated with IC, responded, and then were taken off study and excluded from the analysis due to non-HPV 16 subtype. They were treated with 7000 cGy and are alive and well. Poor risk factors (ECE, T4, N2c, Non-HPV16 subtype) were present in 72% of 32 subjects; 22 (69%) never smoked. At data cutoff with a median follow up of 50m (21-95m), 28/32 (87.5%) have LRC, 1/32 DM (3.1%), OS is 28/32 (87.5%) and PFS is 27/32 (84.4%). All 5 patients who recurred did so in the first 12m (median 8m); all had 1 or more poor risk factors and 1 is alive with disease 42m post recurrence. 2 year LRC, PFS and OS are 87.4% [95% CI: 69.8%, 95.1%], 84.4% [95% CI: 66.5%, 93.2%] and 90.6% [95% CI: 73.7%, 96.9%] respectively. There was no therapy-related mortality, generally rapid recovery from CRT and minimal long term consequences (to be reported). Conclusions: Induction with mTPF followed by RDCRT resulted in excellent LRC, PFS and OS in patients with LA HPV OPC and significant risk factors. These results compare favorably to standard of care and other dose de-escalation trials in high and low risk categories. This treatment paradigm is highly effective in a LA, high risk HPVOPC patients and is a reasonable treatment option to be compared to other de-escalation treatment plans in Phase 3 trials for this higher risk population. Clinical trial information: NCT02945631, NCT01706939.

NRG-RTOG 1106/ACRIN 6697: A phase IIR trial of standard versus adaptive (mid-treatment PET-based) chemoradiotherapy for stage III NSCLC—Results and comparison to NRG-RTOG 0617 (non-personalized RT dose escalation).

8548 Background: NRG-RTOG 0617 (R0617) found that non-personalized dose escalation of radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent chemotherapy was deleterious. NRG-RTOG 1106/ACRIN 6697 (R1106) studied adaptive chemoradiotherapy, using tumor and patient individualized RT dose intensification simultaneously with field reduction, based upon mid-treatment FDG-PET. Methods: The control arms of both studies used 60 Gy (+ weekly carboplatin/paclitaxel). The investigational arm of R0617 used 74 Gy in 37 fractions, with no field/dose adaptation, while R1106 used mid-treatment FDG-PET (after ̃40 Gy) to design an individualized dose adaptive RT plan with daily-fraction size 2.2 to 3.8 Gy (up to 80.4 Gy/30 fractions), based upon a model of isotoxic lung risk. Nearly all (93%) patients had IMRT. No patients had consolidation immunotherapy. The primary endpoint for R1106 was local-regional-progression freedom (LRPF) assessed by central review. Other endpoints reported here were survival, toxicity, and institution-defined local/regional control. Results: From 2012-2017, 127 patients were enrolled to R1106 (43 in the standard and 84 in the adaptive arms), with a median follow-up of 3.6 years. The median actual RT dose in the adaptive arm was 71 Gy (Q1-Q3 68-76 Gy). The 2-year LRPF was 59.5% versus 54.6% (p=0.66) for standard versus adaptive RT; the 3-year survival rates were 49.1% versus 47.5% (p=0.80). An exploratory analysis of 2-year in-field local primary tumor control and local-regional tumor control (institution-assessed) were 58.5% and 55.6% for standard RT, and 75.6% and 66.3% for adaptive RT, respectively. As shown in the table, there were no significant differences in cardiac or esophageal adverse events between the two arms; the adaptive RT arm had more Grade 3+ respiratory events (23.8% versus 14.3%). Conclusions: NRG-RTOG1106 did not meet its primary endpoint of demonstrating improved LRPF. Unlike R0617, there was no suggestion of a detrimental effect of adaptive dose-intensified RT on survival and cardiac events. Studies to refine personalized RT, especially in the immunotherapy era, should be considered. Outcome comparison between R0617 and R1106. Clinical trial information: NCT01507428. [Table: see text]

The Impact of Durvalumab on Local-Regional Control in Stage III NSCLCs Treated With Chemoradiation and on KEAP1-NFE2L2-Mutant Tumors

IntroductionKEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant NSCLCs are chemoradiation resistant and at high risk for local-regional failure (LRF) after concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT). To elucidate the impact of durvalumab on local-regional control, we evaluated LRF in patients with NSCLC treated with cCRT with and without durvalumab. MethodsPatients with stage III NSCLC treated with cCRT or cCRT and durvalumab who underwent tumor genomic profiling were evaluated. The incidence of LRF and outcomes of patients with and without KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant tumors were evaluated. ResultsWe analyzed 120 consecutive patients (cCRT alone, n = 54; cCRT and durvalumab, n = 66). Patients treated with cCRT alone had significantly more LRF events compared with those treated with cCRT and durvalumab, with 12-month LRF incidence of 39% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24%–54%) and 18% (95% CI: 8%–28%), respectively (p = 0.002). Among patients treated with cCRT alone and cCRT and durvalumab, 20 patients (37%) and 18 patients (27%), respectively, had KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant tumors. In patients treated with cCRT alone, those with KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant tumors had worse local-regional control (p = 0.015), and on multivariate analysis, KEAP1-NFE2L2 mutation predicted for LRF (hazard ratio = 3.9, 95% CI: 1.6–9.8, p = 0.003). Nevertheless, patients with and without KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant tumors had similar LRF outcomes (p = 0.541) when treated with cCRT and durvalumab, and mutational status did not predict for LRF (p = 0.545). Among those with KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant tumors, cCRT and durvalumab significantly reduced the incidence of LRF compared with cCRT alone: 12-month LRF incidence of 62% (95% CI: 40%–84%) versus 25% (95% CI: 4%–46%), respectively (p = 0.021). ConclusionsDurvalumab after cCRT significantly improves local-regional control and reduces LRF in chemoradiation-resistant KEAP1-NFE2L2-mutant NSCLC tumors.

Proton Reirradiation for Locoregionally Recurrent Breast Cancer

PurposeLocal-regional recurrence (LRR) of breast cancer after prior adjuvant radiation (RT) can present a clinical challenge. Proton therapy is recommended by the American Society for Radiation Oncology in cases where reirrradiation is needed; however, data are limited. We present the toxicity and outcomes after reirradiation for local-regional recurrence of breast cancer with proton therapy. Methods and MaterialsA single-institution retrospective review identified patients with the following criteria: LRR of breast cancer, prior photon radiation to the same region, proton beam reirradiation, and definitive intent. Surgery or systemic therapy at the time of recurrence was used when indicated. The log-rank test was used to compare Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to compare worst reported toxicities with clinical variables. ResultsThe population included 27 patients with a history of prior radiation and treated with proton therapy for LRR between 2012 and 2019. The median interval between courses was 9.7 years. Proton reirradiation regimens included whole breast/chest wall (WB/CW) with regional nodal RT (22/27), nodal RT alone (2/27), or WB/CW alone (3/27). The median dose was 51 Gy, and the most common fractionation was 1.5 Gy twice daily. Median follow-up after reirradiation was 16.6 months. Acute grade 3 toxicities included dermatitis in 2 patients and breast pain in 2 patients. Grade 2 or higher late toxicities included 6 G2 rib fractures and 1 G2 brachial plexopathy, 1 G3 dermatitis, 1 G3 breast pain, and 1 G4 dermatitis. Twelve patients had new documented recurrences of which 1 was a second in-field LRR, and there were 7 deaths. ConclusionsProton salvage reirradiation to median 51 Gy in 1.5 Gy twice daily appears to be safe with acceptable acute and late toxicity, and effective with >95% local-regional control.

Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Bladder Cancer

Local-regional failure for patients with ≥pT3 urothelial carcinoma after radical cystectomy is a significant clinical challenge. Prospective randomised trials have failed to show that chemotherapy reduces the risk of local-regional recurrences. Salvage treatment for local failures is difficult and often unsuccessful. There is promising evidence, particularly from a recent Egyptian National Cancer Institute trial, that radiation therapy plus chemotherapy can significantly reduce local recurrences compared with chemotherapy alone, and that this improvement in local-regional control may translate to meaningful improvements in disease-free and overall survival with acceptable toxicity. In light of the high rates of local failure following cystectomy for locally advanced disease and the progress that has been made in identifying patients at high risk of failure and the patterns of failure in the pelvis, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines were revised to include postoperative radiotherapy as an option to consider for patients with ≥pT3 disease. Here we review the problem of local-regional failure after cystectomy, identify patients who would probably benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy, review the patterns of pelvic failure after cystectomy, discuss technical details of radiation treatment and review the modern literature on this topic. Adjuvant radiotherapy should be considered as a treatment option for patients with locally advanced disease, especially those with positive margins or squamous cell carcinoma.

Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Nasopharynx Cancer: 2-year Outcomes from a Single Institution.

PurposeAdvances in radiotherapy have improved tumor control and reduced toxicity in the management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Local failure remains a problem for some patients with advanced primary tumors, and toxicities are significant given the large treatment volume and tumor proximity to critical structures, even with modern photon-based radiotherapy. Proton therapy has unique dosimetric advantages, and recent technological advances now allow delivery of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), which can potentially improve the therapeutic ratio in NPC. We report our 2-year clinical outcomes with IMPT for NPC.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed treatment records of patients with NPC treated with IMPT at our center. Demographics, dosimetry, tumor response, local regional control (LRC), distant metastasis, overall survival, and acute and late toxicity outcomes were reviewed. Analyses were performed with descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicity was graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0).ResultsTwenty-six patients were treated from 2015 to 2020. Median age was 48 years (range, 19–73 years), 62% (n = 16) had T3-T4 disease, 92% (n = 24) were node positive, 92% (n = 24) had stage III-IV disease, and 69% (n = 18) had positive results for Epstein-Barr virus. Dose-painted pencil-beam IMPT was used. Most patients (85%; 22 of 26) were treated with 70 Gy(RBE) in 33 fractions once daily; 4 (15%) underwent hyperfractionated accelerated treatment twice daily. All received concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy; 7 (27%) also received induction chemotherapy. All patients (100%) completed the planned radiotherapy, and no acute or late grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed. At median follow-up of 25 months (range, 4-60), there were 2 local regional failures (8%) and 3 distant metastases (12%). The Kaplan-Meier 2-year LRC, freedom from distant metastasis, and overall survival were 92%, 87%, and 85% respectively.ConclusionIMPT is feasible in locally advanced NPC with early outcomes demonstrating excellent LRC and favorable toxicity profile. Our data add to the growing body of evidence supporting the clinical use of IMPT for NPC.

Intraperitoneal gemcitabine chemotherapy is safe for patients with resected pancreatic cancer: final clinical and pharmacologic data from a phase II protocol and recommended future directions.

Worldwide, the surgical management of pancreas cancer using the Whipple procedure results in long-term survival in approximately 20% of patients when there is a R0 resection. Local recurrence within the resection site and peritoneal metastases are a prominent part of this treatment failure. Gemcitabine was used for a regional chemotherapy treatment strategy. Doses and schedules of chemotherapy routinely used for systemic treatment were administered as hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the operating room. Then patients went on to receive 6 months of long-term normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NIPEC) with gemcitabine. Data was gathered to determine a pharmacologic rationale and safety of this monotherapy with gemcitabine. The use of intraperitoneal gemcitabine was well supported by pharmacologic data. The peritoneal surface exposure as measured by pharmacokinetic studies showed the area under the curve (AUC) of intraperitoneal concentration times time divided by plasma concentration times time to be 95-507. Regarding the safety of HIPEC gemcitabine in 12 patients, a single class III adverse event that resolved by radiologic intervention occurred. In patients with resected pancreas cancer treated with HIPEC gemcitabine the morbidity and mortality rate was not increased over historical data of resection alone. Also, six cycles of NIPEC gemcitabine were well tolerated in eight of eight eligible patients with seven patients completing 6 months of long-term intraperitoneal treatment. Local recurrence and peritoneal metastases were absent. Median survival was 29 months and five patients survived longer than 2 years. These early data suggest that intraperitoneal gemcitabine given under hyperthermic conditions in the operating theater and long-term through an intraperitoneal port is safe. Also, in this pilot study long-term local control with intraperitoneal gemcitabine occurred. Intraperitoneal gemcitabine may improve local-regional control of resected pancreas cancer. This may lead to more successful multimodality strategies.

Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy for PD-L1 Expressing Inoperable Stage III NSCLC Leads to Significant Improvement of Local-Regional Control and Overall Survival in the Real-World Setting

Simple SummaryConcurrent platinbased chemoradiotherapy followed by maintenance treatment with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab is the new standard of care for inoperable stage III NSCLC. The present study compares the oncological outcome of patients treated with chemoradiotherapy to those treated with chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab (CRT-IO) in the real-world setting. Median follow-up for entire cohort was 33.1 months and median overall survival was 27.2 months. In the CRT-IO cohort after a median follow-up of 20.9 (range: 6.3–27.4) months, local-regional-progression-free-survival, progression-free, and overall survival (PFS, OS) were significantly improved compared to the historical cohort of conventional chemoradiotherapy patients. This real-world analysis demonstrated that durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) led to significant improvement of local-regional control, PFS, and OS in PD-L1 expressing inoperable stage III NSCLC patients compared to a historical cohort.Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by maintenance treatment with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab is a new standard of care for inoperable stage III NSCLC. The present study compares the oncological outcome of patients treated with CRT to those treated with CRT and durvalumab (CRT-IO) in the real-world setting. The analysis was performed based on the retro- and prospectively collected data of 144 consecutive inoperable stage III NSCLC patients treated between 2011–2020. Local-regional-progression-free-survival (LRPFS—defined as progression in the mediastinum, hilum and/or supraclavicular region at both sites and the involved lung), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated from the last day of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT). Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 33.1 months (range: 6.3–111.8) and median overall survival was 27.2 (95% CI: 19.5–34.9) months. In the CRT-IO cohort after a median follow-up of 20.9 (range: 6.3–27.4) months, median PFS was not reached, LRPFS (p = 0.002), PFS (p = 0.018), and OS (p = 0.005) were significantly improved vs. the historical cohort of conventional CRT patients. After propensity-score matching (PSM) analysis with age, gender, histology, tumor volume, and treatment mode, and exact matching for T-and N-stage, 22 CRT-IO patients were matched 1:2 to 44 CRT patients. Twelve-month LRPFS, PFS, and OS rates in the CRT-IO vs. CRT cohort were 78.9 vs. 45.5% (p = 0.002), 60.0 vs. 31.8% (p = 0.007), and 100 vs. 70.5% (p = 0.003), respectively. This real-world analysis demonstrated that durvalumab after CRT led to significant improvement of local-regional control, PFS, and OS in PD-L1 expressing inoperable stage III NSCLC patients compared to a historical cohort.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients With pT1-T2N0 Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes in a cohort of patients with early-stage oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC). We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with pT1-T2N0 (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] seventh edition) OTSCC treated from 2000 to 2018. Two-year actuarial rates of local regional control, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were calculated for the entire cohort and patients with/without adjuvant radiation. Ninety-six patients met the criteria with a median follow-up of 4 years; 14 had adjuvant radiation, while 82 had surgery alone. Two-year local regional control was 82.7% (75.4% to 90.8%) for the entire cohort, 84.9% (77.8% to 93.2%) for surgery only, and 70.7% (50.2% to 99.6%) for patients with adjuvant radiation. Two-year progression-free survival was 82.7% (75.3% to 90.8%). Of the 20 patients with recurrence, 11 (55%) were successfully salvaged. Local regional recurrence remains modest in early-stage OTSCC, but salvage is possible with high survival rates. Level III-retrospective cohort study.

Outcome of Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of Head and Neck After Postoperative Intensity Modulation Radiotherapy: A Single Institution Study.

ObjectiveThis study was retrospectively evaluated the outcome of postoperative intensity modulation radiotherapy (IMRT) for patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma of head and neck (ACCHN), and identified the unfavorable prognostic factors.MethodsFifty-five ACCHN patients treated in Sichuan Cancer Hospital between January 2007 and December 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Median age of patient was 47 years (range, 21–73 years). Thirty-five patients were male and 20 were female. In 30 patients, tumors were located in major salivary glands (54.5%), and 25 patients in minor salivary glands (45.5%). The numbers of R0, R1, and R2 surgical resection classification patients were 22 (40.0%), 20 (36.4%), and 13 (23.6%). The median total RT dose was 62 Gy (range, 46–72 Gy), and 54.5% of patients were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Statistical analyses were performed using the Log rank test for univariate analysis and the Cox proportional hazard model for multivariate analysis.ResultsMedian follow-up period was 68.5 months (12–132 months). The 5-year local-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were 93.9%, 75.3% and 82.5%. In univariate analysis, T stages (p=0.025) and AJCC stages (p=0.036) were the prognostic factors for OS; Age (p=0.042), T stages (p=0.025), N stages (p=0.021), AJCC stages (p=0.021) and adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.010) were the prognostic factors for DMFS; T stage (p=0.049) was the prognostic factor for LRRFS. In multivariate factors analyses, T stages (p=0.026), AJCC stages (p=0.028) and RT dose (p=0.025) were the significant prognosticators for OS. The most common acute toxicities over three degrees were myelosuppression (5.5%), mucositis (9.1%) and dermatitis (1.8%).ConclusionPostoperative IMRT seems to achieve reasonable local-regional control and OS in patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma of head and neck, with acceptable treatment relative toxicities.

Radiotherapy for Oropharyngeal Carcinoma With an Uninvolved Contralateral Neck: The Safety of Omission of Contralateral High Level II and Retropharyngeal Lymph Nodes From Elective Target Volumes

AimsTo analyse outcomes and patterns of failure in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) treated with definitive volumetric modulated arc therapy with omission of contralateral high level II lymph nodes (HLII) and retropharyngeal lymph nodes (RPLN) in the contralateral uninvolved neck. Materials and methodsPatients with OPC treated between January 2016 and July 2019 were retrospectively identified. In the absence of contralateral neck disease, institutional protocols allowed omission of contralateral HLII and contralateral RPLN in the additional absence of ipsilateral RPLN, soft palate/posterior pharyngeal wall primary. ResultsIn total, 238 patients with OPC and an uninvolved contralateral neck received definitive (chemo)radiotherapy with bilateral neck treatment. The median follow-up was 30.6 months. Two-year local control, regional control and overall survival were 91.0, 91.6 and 86.5%, respectively. Contralateral HLII were omitted in 159/238 (66.8%) patients; this included 106 patients in whom the primary tumour was at/crossed the midline. The contralateral RPLN region was omitted from elective target volumes for 175/238 (73.5%); this included 114 patients with a primary tumour at/crossed the midline. The mean contralateral parotid dose when contralateral HLII and RPLN were both omitted was 24.4 Gy, compared with 28.3 Gy without HLII/RPLN omission (P < 0.001). Regional progression occurred in 18/238 (7.6%) patients, all involving the ipsilateral neck with one bilateral. There were no recurrences in the contralateral HLII or RPLN regions. ConclusionIn patients with OPC and an uninvolved contralateral neck receiving bilateral (chemo)radiotherapy, the omission of contralateral RPLN and HLII from elective target volumes was safe and could lead to reduced contralateral parotid doses.

Impact of p53, HIF1a, Ki-67, CA-9, and GLUT1 Expression on Treatment Outcomes in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Definitive Chemoradiation Therapy

The objective of this study was to assess the association between pretreatment p53, hypoxia inducible factor 1a (HIF1a), Ki-67, carbonic anhydrase-9 (CA-9), and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) expression in locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated definitively with concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT) and treatment outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local-regional control (LC), and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS). Twenty-eight patients treated definitively and consecutively for cervical cancer with CRT had p53, HIF1a, Ki-67, CA-9, and GLUT1 protein expression assessed and scored semiquantitatively by 3 pathologists, blinded to the treatment outcomes. Outcomes were stratified by p53 (H-score: <15 vs. ≥15), HIF1a (H-score: <95 vs. ≥95), Ki-67 (labeling index <41% vs. ≥41%), CA-9 (H-score: <15 vs. ≥15), and GLUT1 (H-score: <175 vs. ≥175) expression. OS, PFS, LC, and DMFS rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between groups were evaluated by the log-rank test. Notable clinical characteristics of the cohort included median age of 51 years (range: 32 to 74 y), FIGO stage IIB disease (57.2%), clinical node-negative disease (64.3%), squamous cell carcinoma (89.3%), and adenocarcinoma (10.7%). Treatment outcomes included 5-year OS (57.2%), PFS (48.1%), LC (72.1%), and DMFS (62.9%). For HIF1a H-score <95 and ≥95, the 5-year OS (52.0% and 68.4%, P=0.58), PFS (53.0% and 40.9%, P=0.75), LC (71.6% and 68.2%, P=0.92), and DMFS (59.7% and 52.0%, P=0.91) were not significantly different. For Ki-67 labeling index <41% and ≥41%, the 5-year OS (44.9% and 66.6%, P=0.35), PFS (38.9% and 55.4%, P=0.53), LC (57.7% and 85.7%, P=0.22), and DMFS (67.3% and 61.0%, P=0.94) were not significantly different. For CA-9 H-score <15 and ≥15, the 5-year OS (54.4% and 66.7%, P=0.39), PFS (57.3% and 40.0%, P=0.87), LC (70.0% and 70.0%, P=0.95), and DMFS (70.0% and 46.7%, P=0.94) were not significantly different. For GLUT1 H-score <175 and ≥175, the 5-year OS (43.6% and 43.6%, P=0.32), PFS (55.6% and 49.5%, P=0.72), LC (72.9% and 71.5%, P=0.97), and DMFS (62.5% and 59.6%, P=0.76) were not significantly different. For p53, H-score <15 and ≥15, the 5-year OS (62% and 53%), PFS (63% and 30.3%), LC (87.5% and 52%), and DMFS (79.6% and 41.6%). In this study population, HIF1a, Ki-67, CA-9, and GLUT1 expression did not predict treatment response or outcomes in locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated definitively with CRT. There was a nonstatistically significant trend towards worse outcomes with p53 expression.