Local Adverse Reactions Research Articles

Probiotics as adjuvants to mitigate adverse reactions and enhance effectiveness in Food Allergy Immunotherapy.

In the past decades, food allergies became increasingly dominant since early childhood, leading to a lower quality of life and to increasing costs addressed by the health care system. Beside standard avoidance of specific allergens and drug treatments following allergen exposure, a great deal of research has lately focused on Food Allergy Allergen Immunotherapy (FA-AIT). SCIT and EPIT (Subcutaneous and Epicutaneous Immunotherapy), OIT (Oral Immunotherapy), and SLIT (Sublingual Immunotherapy) consist in gradual exposure to allergens to desensitize and achieve tolerance once therapy has ended. Although promising, FA-AIT may bring acute local and systemic adverse reactions. To enhance efficacy, safety and convenience of AIT, the quest of potential adjuvants to mitigate the adverse reactions becomes crucial. Immunomodulatory activities, such as that of increasing the regulatory T cells and decreasing the IgE, have been observed in specific probiotics' strains and multiple studies elucidated the role of gut microbiota as a major interplayer among the host and its immune system. In this review, the microbiome modulation is shown as potential AIT adjuvant, nevertheless the need of more clinical studies in the near future is pivotal to assess the efficacy of targeted bacterial therapies and faecal microbiota transplantation.

Breaking the mold: nontraditional approaches to allergen immunotherapy for environmental allergens.

Allergen immunotherapy is a disease-modifying treatment for allergic diseases. The predominant traditional immunotherapy is through subcutaneous administration of allergens to gradually desensitize allergic individuals. While effective, traditional allergen immunotherapy approaches are often lengthy, time consuming for patients and can result in local or systemic adverse reactions. Nontraditional immunotherapies are emerging as promising alternatives, offering potentially more convenient, safe and efficacious treatment options. This review sought to comprehensively examine the safety, efficacy and performance of various nontraditional immunotherapies for environmental allergens. Nontraditional immunotherapy approaches covered in this review include sublingual, local nasal, intralymphatic rush and ultra-rush immunotherapy, allergoid, microbial and anti-IgE immunotherapies. Nontraditional immunotherapies show significant promise in addressing the limitations of traditional subcutaneous immunotherapy. Methods like intralymphatic and rush immunotherapy offer shorter treatment regimens, enhancing patient adherence and convenience. The co-administration of probiotics or monoclonal antibodies, like omalizumab, with AIT appears to improve treatment efficacy and safety. Despite these advancements, further large-scale, long-term studies are needed to establish standardized protocols, dosing and validate long-term effects of these nontraditional immunotherapies. Standardizing outcome measurements across studies is crucial for accurate comparisons of nontraditional immunotherapies prior to widespread clinical adoption of these innovative techniques.

A post-marketing study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a quadrivalent influenza split-virion vaccine in elderly people aged 60 years and older

BackgroundInfluenza remains a global public health concern. Understanding the vaccination-induced response in an aging population, which is susceptible and at high risk, is essential for disease prevention and control. Here, we report findings on the safety and immunogenicity of a quadrivalent influenza split-virion vaccine (15 µg/subtype/0.5 ml/dose) (hereinafter referred to as the “quadrivalent influenza vaccine”) in a population aged ≥ 60 years.MethodsThis open-label, pragmatic post-marketing trial enrolled 1399 older adults to receive one dose of an approved commercially available quadrivalent influenza vaccine manufactured by Hualan Biological Bacterin Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Hualan Bio”). Participants with contraindications for the vaccine were excluded, while poor health condition was acceptable. All vaccinated subjects experienced adverse events collection within 30 days and serious adverse events within 180 days post-vaccination. 25% subjects, selected randomly, underwent venous blood sampling pre-vaccination and 30 days after post-vaccination, for detecting antibody titers against each subtype of influenza virus by hemagglutination inhibition assay. The incidences of adverse events and antibody titers against each subtype of influenza virus were statistically analyzed using SAS 9.4.ResultsNo grade 3 adverse reactions occurred within 30 days post-vaccination. The incidences of overall adverse reactions, local adverse reactions and systemic adverse reactions were 3.79%, 2.86% and 1.00%, respectively. No serious adverse reactions occurred within 180 days post-vaccination. There were 350 subjects who completed venous blood sampling pre-vaccination, among whom 348 subjects completed venous blood sampling at 30 days post-vaccination for immunogenicity assessment. With respect to hemagglutination inhibition antibodies against influenza viruses H1N1, H3N2, BV and BY subtypes, at 30 days post-vaccination, the seroconversion rates were 87.64%, 75.57%, 73.28% and 78.74%, respectively; the seropositive rates were 93.97%, 98.56%, 79.31% and 95.40%, respectively; and the geometric mean increase (GMI) in post-immunization/pre-immunization antibodies was 24.80, 7.26, 10.39 and 7.39, respectively.ConclusionOne 15 µg/subtype dose of the vaccine had a good safety profile and elicited favorable immunogenicity among subjects aged ≥ 60 years. The results of this study indicate that Hualan Bio quadrivalent influenza vaccine strike balance between safety and immunogenicity, supporting unnecessity to increase dosage or inoculation frequency for further enhancing immunogenicity.Trial registrationRegistered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Registration number: NCT06334510. Registered on 28/03/2024 (retrospectively registered).

Safety and immunogenicity of an mRNA-based RSV vaccine in Japanese older adults aged ≥60 years: A phase 1, randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BackgroundRespiratory syncytial virus (RSV) represents a global health concern, including in older adults. This study assessed the safety and immunogenicity of mRNA-1345, an investigational mRNA RSV vaccine, in adults aged ≥60 years of Japanese descent. MethodsIn this phase 1, randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled study, participants were randomized to receive one injection of mRNA-1345 100 μg or placebo. Solicited local and systemic adverse reactions (ARs) were collected within 7 days following injection. Unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were collected up to 28 days after injection; AEs of special interest, medically attended AEs, and serious AEs were collected through end of study. Immunogenicity was assessed at baseline and months 1, 2, 3, and 6 following injection. ResultsTwenty-five adults of Japanese descent aged ≥60 years received one injection of mRNA-1345 100 μg (n = 21) or placebo (n = 4). mRNA-1345 was well-tolerated; the most common local and systemic solicited ARs were injection site pain, and fatigue and myalgia, respectively, which were generally mild to moderate and transient. No serious AEs were reported. Neutralizing (nAb) and binding (bAb) antibodies were detectable at baseline, consistent with prior RSV exposure. mRNA-1345 boosted RSV nAb titers and preF bAb concentrations 1 month post-injection (geometric mean fold rise: RSV-A nAb, 11.2; RSV-B nAb, 6.6; preF bAb, 9.1). Titers among mRNA-1345 recipients remained above baseline through 6 months. ConclusionsmRNA-1345 100 μg was well-tolerated among older adults of Japanese descent and induced nAbs and bAbs which were durable through 6 months, supporting its continued development. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04528719.

Safety and immunogenicity of a single-dose omicron-containing COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2/3 trial

Most individuals show immunity to SARS-CoV-2 from vaccination or infection, or both. We aimed to determine the safety and immunogenicity of an omicron-containing COVID-19 vaccine (mRNA-1273.222) in vaccine-naive adolescents who were SARS-CoV-2 positive. Part 3 of the phase 2/3 TeenCOVE trial was a phase 3, open-label, single-arm part done in the USA and the Dominican Republic that enrolled healthy, vaccine-naive adolescents (aged 12-17 years) to receive two 50 μg doses of mRNA-1273.222 (ancestral strain Wuhan-Hu-1 and omicron subvariants BA.4 and BA.5), 6 months apart. Primary reactogenicity and safety outcomes included assessment of solicited local or systemic adverse reactions 7 days after vaccination, and unsolicited and prespecified adverse events throughout study participation. Inferred effectiveness (primary immunogenicity outcome) was established by comparing neutralising antibody responses 28 days after dose 1 of mRNA-1273.222 in SARS-CoV-2-positive adolescents with responses 28 days after dose 2 of mRNA-1273 100 μg primary series in SARS-CoV-2-negative young adults (aged 18-25 years) from the COVE trial. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04649151). Between Dec 21, 2022, and June 5, 2023, 379 adolescents (378 of whom were SARS-CoV-2 positive) received at least one mRNA-1273.222 dose and were included in the safety analysis set. The reactogenicity profile was favourable compared with the mRNA-1273 primary series, with no new safety concerns identified. Unsolicited adverse events were reported in 49 (13%) of 379 participants; no deaths or adverse events leading to study discontinuation were reported. The immunogenicity set included 245 adolescents from the per-protocol immunogenicity subset who were SARS-CoV-2 positive at baseline and 296 young adults who were SARS-CoV-2 negative. Compared with the mRNA-1273 primary series in SARS-CoV-2-negative young adults, a single dose of mRNA-1273.222 induced superior (geometric mean ratio [GMR] 95% CI lower bound >1) neutralising antibody responses against omicron BA.4 and BA.5 (GMR 48·95 [95% CI 44·21-54·21]) and non-inferior (GMR 95% CI lower bound >0·667) neutralising antibody responses against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 (GMR 4·25 [95% CI 3·69-4·88]) in SARS-CoV-2-positive adolescents. In vaccine-naive, SARS-CoV-2-positive adolescents, single-dose mRNA-1273.222 was effective against COVID-19 based on successful immunobridging to the two-dose mRNA-1273 primary series in young adults. The findings support a simplified single-dose vaccination schedule with variant-containing mRNA vaccines, regardless of previous vaccination status. Moderna.

Impact of COVID-19 on adverse reactions to subcutaneous specific immunotherapy in children:a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundCOVID-19 is a new infectious disease. To investigate whether severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection increases the adverse reactions of subcutaneous specific immunotherapy (SCIT) in children.MethodsThis study was conducted by collecting relevant data from children who underwent house dust mite SCIT from April 3, 2021, to March 18, 2023, including information on the time of COVID-19 infection, symptoms, and adverse reactions after each allergen injection. A mixed effects model was used to analyze the changes in adverse reactions before and after the COVID-19 infection.ResultsAmong the records of adverse reactions from 2658 injections in 123 children who underwent SCIT, the overall adverse reaction rate before COVID-19 infection was 39.8% and 30.0% after COVID-19 infection. Compared with pre-infection with COVID-19, the risks of overall adverse reactions, local adverse reactions, and systemic adverse reactions of immunotherapy after COVID-19 infection were reduced (odds ratio [OR] = 0.24, 0.31, and 0.28, all P < 0.05). Among the local adverse reactions, the incidence of the unvaccinated group was the highest (15.3% vs. 7.1%). The incidence of overall and local adverse reactions to SCIT decreased in 2-vaccinated COVID-19 recipients (OR = 0.29–0.31, P < 0.05).ConclusionsIn children, SARS-CoV-2 infection does not increase the incidence of adverse reactions to SCIT. This finding can provide a basis for the implementation of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Insights into Patient Experiences with Facilitated Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin Therapy in Primary Immune Deficiency: A Prospective Observational Cohort

BackgroundImmunoglobulin G replacement therapy (IgRT), intravenous (IV) and subcutaneous (SC) routes, is pivotal in treatment of primary immunodeficiencies (PID). In recent years, facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG), a combination of rHuPH20 and 10% IgG has emerged as a delivery method to combine advantages of both IV and SC.MethodIn an observational prospective cohort, we investigated patient experience with fSCIG in PID patients from 5 PID centers for up to 12 months. We assessed the efficacy and safety of this treatment with patient/caregiver- and physician-reported indicators. Additionally, we analyzed patient treatment satisfaction (TSQM-9) and quality of life (QoL).ResultsWe enrolled 29 patients (22 pediatric and 7 adults; 14 females and 15 males; (median: 15, min–max: 2–40.9 years) who initiated fSCIG as IgRT-naive (n = 1), switched from conventional rapid-push 10% SCIG (n = 6) or IVIG (n = 22). Among the participants, 19 (65%) exhibited antibody deficiencies, 8 (27%) combined immunodeficiencies, and 2 (7%) immune dysregulations. Remarkably, targeted trough immunoglobulin G levels were achieved under all previous IgRTs as well as fSCIG. No severe systemic adverse drug reactions were documented, despite prevalent local (%86.45) and mild systemic (%26.45) adverse reactions were noted with fSCIG. Due to mild systemic symptoms, 2 patients switched from fSCIG to 10% SCIG. The patient satisfaction survey revealed a notable increase at 2-4th (p = 0.102); 5-8th (p = 0.006) and 9-12th (p < 0.001) months compared to the baseline. No significant trends were observed in QoL surveys.ConclusionfSCIG demonstrates admissable tolerability and efficacy in managing PIDs in addition to notable increase of patients’ drug satisfaction with IgRT. The identified benefits support the continuation of this therapy despite the local reactions.

Study of different pre-treatments in the comparison of the efficacy of photodynamic therapy for moderate to severe acne vulgaris

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of CO2 fractional laser and microneedling pretreatment combined with ALA-PDT for moderate-to-severe acne, aiming to optimize clinical treatment. MethodsPatients were randomly divided into three groups: Group A (CO2 fractional laser + ALA-PDT), Group B (microneedling + ALA-PDT), and Group C (ALA-PDT). Each group underwent photodynamic therapy once a week for 3 weeks. Efficacy was assessed at the end of the 4th week, and recurrence was assessed at the end of the 12th week. ResultsA total of 150 patients with moderate to severe acne were included in this study, with 50 patients in each group. Four weeks after the end of treatment, the effective rates were 88 % for Group A, 62 % for Group B, and 36 % for Group C. Statistically significant differences were found between the groups (P < 0.05), with Group A showing superior efficacy compared to Group B (P < 0.05). No serious systemic or local adverse reactions were observed in any group. No recurrence was seen in any group 12 weeks after the end of treatment, and some patients continued to show improvement in skin lesions over time. ConclusionBoth the CO2 fractional laser group and the microneedling group improved the efficacy of photodynamic therapy for moderate to severe acne compared to the control group, with the CO2 fractional laser group demonstrating better efficacy and fewer adverse effects.

Preliminary Evaluation of the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Novel Protein-Based Pneumococcal Vaccine in Healthy Adults Aged 18-49: A Phase Ia Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study.

Background: Protein-based pneumococcal vaccines (PBPVs) may offer expanded protection against Streptococcus pneumoniae and tackle the antimicrobial resistance crisis in pneumococcal infections. This study examined the safety and immunogenicity in healthy adults vaccinated with three doses of a protein-based pneumococcal vaccine containing pneumococcal surface protein A (PspA) (PRX1, P3296 and P5668) and in combination with a recombinant detoxified pneumolysin protein (PlyLD). Methods: This phase Ia randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical study enrolled healthy adults aged 18-49 years. The participants were randomized into experimental (low-dose, medium-dose, high-dose) and placebo groups in a ratio of 3:1. Three doses of investigational vaccine were given to the participants with an interval of two months. Safety endpoints included the occurrence of total adverse reactions, solicited local and systemic adverse reactions, unsolicited adverse reactions, serious adverse events (SAEs), and several laboratory parameters. Immunogenicity endpoints included geometric mean titers (GMT) of anti-PspA (PRX1, P3296 and P5668) and anti-PlyLD antibodies level as determined by ELISA, seropositivity rates of PspA and PlyLD antibodies (>4-fold increase) and neutralization activity of anti-Ply antibody in serum. Results: A total of 118 participants completed the study of three doses. The candidate PBPV was safe and well-tolerated in all experimental groups. No vaccine-related SAEs were observed in this study. Most solicited adverse reactions were mild and transient. The most frequently reported solicited adverse reactions in the medium- and high-dose groups was pain at the injection site, while in the low-dose group it was elevated blood pressure. The immunogenicity data showed a sharp increase in the GMT level of anti-PspA-RX1, anti-PspA-3296, anti-PspA-5668, and anti-PlyLD antibodies in serum. The results also showed that the elicited antibodies were dosage-dependent. The high-dose group showed a higher immune response against PspA-RX1, PspA-3296, PspA-5668, and PlyLD antigens. However, repeat vaccination did not increase the level of anti-PspA antibodies but the level of anti-PlyLD antibody. High seropositivity rates were also observed for anti-PspA-RX1, anti-PspA-3296, anti-PspA-5668, and anti-PlyLD antibodies. In addition, a significant difference in the GMT levels of anti-Ply antibody between the high-, medium-, and low-dose groups post each vaccination were indicated by neutralization activity tests. Conclusions: The PBPV showed a safe and immunogenic profile in this clinical trial. Taking into consideration both safety and immunogenicity data, we propose a single dose of 50 µg (medium dose) of PBPV as the optimum approach in providing expanded protection against Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Grass pollen allergoids conjugated with mannan for subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy: a dose-finding study.

Polymerized allergoids conjugated with mannan represent a novel approach of allergen immunotherapy targeting dendritic cells. In this study, we aimed to determine the optimal dose of mannan-allergoid conjugates derived from grass pollen (Phleum pratense and Dactylis glomerata) administered via either the subcutaneous or sublingual route. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a double-dummy design was conducted, involving 162 participants across 12 centers in Spain. Subjects were randomly allocated to one of nine different treatment groups, each receiving either placebo or active treatment at doses of 500, 1,000, 3,000, or 5,000 mTU/mL over four months. Each participant received five subcutaneous (SC) doses of 0.5 mL each, every 30 days, and a daily sublingual (SL) dose of 0.2 mL. Participants who received active treatment through SC, received placebo through SL. Participants who received active treatment through SL, received placebo SC. One Group, as control, received bot SC and SL placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was the improvement in titrated nasal provocation tests (NPT) at the end of the study compared to baseline. Secondary outcomes included specific antibody (IgG4, IgE) and cellular (IL-10 producing and regulatory T cell) responses. All adverse events and side reactions were recorded and assessed. Post-treatment, the active groups showed improvements in NPT ranging from 33% to 53%, with the highest doses showing the greatest improvements regardless of the administration route. In comparison, the placebo group showed a 12% improvement. Significant differences over placebo were observed at doses of 3,000 mTU/mL (p=0.049 for SL, p=0.015 for SC) and 5,000 mTU/mL (p=0.011 for SL, p=0.015 for SC). A dose-dependent increase in IgG4 was observed following SC administration, and an increase in IL-10 producing cells for both routes of administration. No serious systemic or local adverse reactions were recorded, and no adrenaline was required. Grass pollen immunotherapy with mannan-allergoid conjugates was found to be safe and efficacious in achieving the primary outcome, whether administered via the subcutaneous or sublingual routes, at doses of 3,000 and 5,000 mTU/mL. https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search (EudraCT), identifier 2014-005471-88; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02654223.

Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy combined with omalizumab in children with dust mite-induced asthma

Objective To evaluate the benefits of combining omalizumab with specific immunotherapy (SCIT) in the treatment of children with bronchial asthma. Methods In this study, 83 children with asthma were treated at the Allergy Department of Qingdao University from January 2019 to February 2020. Participants were divided into three groups: SCIT, combination (omalizumab + SCIT), and control (standard asthma medications). We assessed Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) scores, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, and lung function at baseline, 24 wk, and 48 wk. Additionally, asthma medication scores were compared at 24 and 48 wk. Adverse reactions were monitored in both the SCIT and combination groups. Results The combination group demonstrated lower ACQ scores at both 24 and 48 wk, and improved VAS scores at 48 wk compared to the other groups. Additionally, lung function parameters (FEV1 and FEF50) showed significant improvement in the combination group. Reduced asthma medication scores were noted in the combination group at 24 and 48 wk. Local adverse reactions were fewer in the combination group, and no systemic adverse reactions were reported. Conclusion Combining omalizumab with SCIT provides quicker asthma control, lowers medication requirements, and enhances lung function with fewer adverse effects, making it a safe and effective treatment for children with bronchial asthma.

Relative bioavailability, immunogenicity, and safety of two adalimumab-adbm formulations in healthy volunteers: a double-blind, randomized, single-dose, parallel-arm Phase I trial (VOLTAIRE-HCLF)

ABSTRACT Objective VOLTAIRE-HCLF compared the relative bioavailability of citrate-free high-concentration and reference formulations of the biosimilar adalimumab-adbm (Cyltezo®), including pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles, immunogenicity, and safety profiles in healthy volunteers. Methods Healthy volunteers (N = 200) aged 18–55 years and with body mass index of 18.5–29.9 kg/m2 and no prior exposure to adalimumab were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a single subcutaneous injection of either adalimumab-adbm 40 mg/0.4 mL (high-concentration formulation) or 40 mg/0.8 mL (reference formulation). Participants completed 13 follow-up visits over 57 days, followed by a safety follow-up period of up to 70 days. Results The main PK parameters were similar for the high-concentration and reference groups. For all primary endpoints, the geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of AUC0–1344, AUC0–∞, and Cmax for both groups were entirely within the standard 80–125% bioequivalence acceptance range at 101.88% (93.31–111.23%), 105.38% (95.06–116.81%), and 91.29% (84.38–98.76%), respectively. There were no differences in the proportion of anti-drug antibody-positive participants or in the distribution of anti-drug antibody titers between the two formulations at any time point after drug dosing. Participants who were given the high-concentration formulation of adalimumab-adbm experienced a lower incidence of adverse events and local reactions than those who were given the reference formulation. Conclusions Overall, the high-concentration and reference adalimumab-adbm formulations had highly similar PK and immunogenicity profiles and were safe and well tolerated. Clinical trial registration NCT05203289

Safety and Immunogenicity of an mRNA-Based hMPV/PIV3 Combination Vaccine in Seropositive Children.

Human metapneumovirus (hMPV) and parainfluenza virus type 3 (PIV3) are common respiratory illnesses in children. The safety and immunogenicity of an investigational mRNA-based vaccine, mRNA-1653, encoding membrane-anchored fusion proteins of hMPV and PIV3, was evaluated in hMPV/PIV3-seropositive children. In this phase 1b randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study, hMPV/PIV3-seropositive children were enrolled sequentially into 2 dose levels of mRNA-1653 administered 2 months apart; children aged 12 to 36 months were randomized (1:1) to receive 10-μg of mRNA-1653 or placebo and children aged 12 to 59 months were randomized (3:1) to receive 30-μg of mRNA-1653 or placebo. Overall, 27 participants aged 18 to 55 months were randomized; 15 participants received 10-μg of mRNA-1653 (n = 8) or placebo (n = 7), whereas 12 participants received 30-μg of mRNA-1653 (n = 9) or placebo (n = 3). mRNA-1653 was well-tolerated at both dose levels. The only reported solicited local adverse reaction was tenderness at injection site; solicited systemic adverse reactions included grade 1 or 2 chills, irritability, loss of appetite, and sleepiness. A single 10-μg or 30-μg mRNA-1653 injection increased hMPV and PIV3 neutralizing antibody titers (geometric mean fold-rise ratio over baseline: hMPV-A = 2.9-6.1; hMPV-B = 6.2-13.2; PIV3 = 2.8-3.0) and preF and postF binding antibody concentrations (geometric mean fold-rise ratio: hMPV preF = 5.3-6.1; postF = 4.6-6.5 and PIV3 preF = 13.9-14.2; postF = 11.0-12.1); a second injection did not further increase antibody levels in these seropositive children. Binding antibody responses were generally preF biased. mRNA-1653 was well-tolerated and boosted hMPV and PIV3 antibody levels in seropositive children aged 12 to 59 months, supporting the continued development of mRNA-1653 or its components for the prevention of hMPV and PIV3.

Oral immunotherapy with enteric-coated capsules for allergic rhinitis caused by house dust mites.

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising allergen-specific approach in the management of food allergy; however, studies on OIT for allergic rhinitis (AR) have rarely been reported. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OIT using enteric-coated capsules for AR induced by house dust mites. A total of 49 patients with AR were enrolled, including 25 who received subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and 24 who received OIT. The clinical efficacy and safety in both groups were evaluated. After 1 year of treatment, both SCIT and OIT demonstrated significant therapeutic effects. OIT was found to be more effective than SCIT in reducing the total AR symptom score and improving the results of nasal provocation tests. Local and systemic adverse reactions were observed in the SCIT group, while none were reported in the OIT group. OIT is an effective and safe treatment for mite-induced AR.

Effect of Topical Silver Nanoparticle Formulation on Wound Bacteria Clearance and Healing in Patients With Infected Wounds Compared to Standard Topical Antibiotic Application: A Randomized Open-Label Parallel Clinical Trial.

Infected wounds pose a special challenge for management, with an increased risk of wound chronicity, systemic infection, and the emergence of antibiotic resistance. Silver nanoparticles have multimodal effects on bacteria clearance and wound healing. This study aimed to document the efficacy of a topical silver nanoparticle-based cream on bacteria clearance and wound healing in infected wounds compared to Mupirocin. This open-label parallel randomized clinical trial allocated 86 participants with infected wounds (culture-positive) into Kadermin, silver nanoparticle-based cream arm (n=43) and Mupirocin arm (n=43) and documented the swab culture on day 5 and wound healing at day 28, along with periodic wound status using the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool. Patients received oral/systemic antibiotics and other medications for underlying diseases. The intention-to-treat principle was adopted for data analysis using the chi-square and Student t tests to document the differences between groups according to variable characteristics. All participants completed the follow-up. On day 5, wound bacteria clearance was observed in 86% and 65.1% of the participants in the Kadermin and Mupirocin arms, respectively (p=0.023). At day 28, complete wound healing was observed in 81.4% and 37.2% of the participants in the Kadermin and Mupirocin arms, respectively (p≤0.001). No local or systemic adverse event or local reaction was observed in any of the participants. Kadermin, the silver nanoparticle-based cream, has better efficacy in achieving faster wound bacteria clearance and healing in infected wounds compared to Mupirocin. This may have relevance for its use as an antibiotic-sparing agent in wound management.

Safety of subcutaneous immunotherapy with Novo-Helisen-Depot in the children: a retrospective analysis from a single center in Northern China.

Little is known about the safety of mite extract product Novo-Helisen Depot (NHD) as subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) in the children with mite allergy especially immediate/late local reaction (LRs). We conducted a retrospective study analyzing the adverse events of the children undergoing subcutaneous immunotherapy with NHD. Adverse events included local and systemic adverse reactions (SRs) at the very early and late stage. The correlation of the basic characteristics, laboratory analysis results, LRs and SRs were analyzed. Two hundred and eighty-seven patients received at least 15 months of subcutaneous immunotherapy with NHD were included in the analysis. Skin-prick testing (SPT) results of D. pteronyssinus was associated with an increased risk of immediate LRs in build-up phase (OR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.02, 2.37) and delayed LRs in maintenance phase (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.05, 2.46), while SPT results of D. farinae was associated with an increased risk of SRs (OR = 3.22, 95% CI: 1.17, 10.00) and severe SRs (OR = 7.68, 95% CI: 1.13, 109.50). Serum IgE level of D. pteronyssinus was associated with an increased risk of SRs (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.03). Patients with both asthma and allergic rhinitis was associated with an increased risk of SR, and severe SRs (P < 0.05). NHD as SCIT is safe. The children with higher SPT level with D. farinae or D. pteronyssinus, higher serum IgE level of D. pteronyssinus, children with both asthma and allergic rhinitis, and the children with treatment interruption had higher risk of adverse events.

Effectiveness and safety of biological therapy in patients with severe asthma in a real clinical practice

To assess effectiveness and safety of biological therapy in patients with severe asthma during 5 yr follow-up. We recruited 129 adult outpatients (29% males) aged 18-81 yrs with severe asthma were followed up during 5 yrs and were examined for every 3-6 months. Eighty five patients were treated by conventional therapy (ICS/LABA ± tiotropium, montelukast, OCS) only and 44 pts additionally received biologicals (оmalizumab - 9 pts, мepolizumab - 8 pts, benralizumab - 11 pts, dupilumab - 16 pts). Pulmonary function tests were measured by dry spirometer (2120, Vitalograph Ltd., UK). Eosinophil count in blood was assessed by automatic haemoanalyser. Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide was measured by a chemiluminescence analyzer (LR4100; Logan Research, UK). Asthma control and quality of life were assessed by using Russian versions of ACQ-5 and SGRQ. The use of biologicals led to a more significant reduction of exacerbations and OCS use, improvement of lung function, asthma control and quality of life, decrease of eosinophil and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide than conventional therapy of severe asthma (p<0.05). Systemic side effects were not registered, frequency of local adverse reactions (edema, hyperemia and itching at injection site) was 14%. Long-term use of biologicals added to conventional therapy in patients with severe asthma is characterized by high effectiveness and favorable safety profile.

Immunogenicity and safety of an ORF7-deficient skin-attenuated and neuro-attenuated live vaccine for varicella: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, phase 2a trial

The Oka varicella vaccine strain remains neurovirulent and can establish lifelong latent infection, raising safety concerns about vaccine-related herpes zoster. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of a skin-attenuated and neuro-attenuated varicella vaccine candidate (v7D vaccine). We did this randomised, double-blind, controlled, phase 2a clinical trial in Jiangsu, China. Healthy children aged 3-12 years with no history of varicella infection or vaccination were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive a single subcutaneous injection of the v7D vaccine at 3·3 log10 plaque forming units (PFU; low-dose v7D group), 3·9 log10 PFU (medium-dose v7D group), and 4·2 log10 PFU (high-dose v7D group), or the positive control varicella vaccine (vOka vaccine group). All the participants, laboratory personnel, and investigators other than the vaccine preparation and management staff were masked to the vaccine allocation. The primary outcome was assessment of the geometric mean titres (GMTs) and seroconversion rates of anti-varicella zoster virus immunoglobulin G (IgG) induced by different dose groups of v7D vaccine at 0, 42, 60, and 90 days after vaccination in the per-protocol set for humoral immune response analysis. Safety was a secondary outcome, focusing on adverse events within 42 days post-vaccination, and serious adverse events within 6 months after vaccination. This study was registered on Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000034434. On Aug 18-21, 2020, 842 eligible volunteers were enrolled and randomly assigned treatment. After three participants withdrew, 839 received a low dose (n=211), middle dose (n=210), or high dose (n=210) of v7D vaccine, or the vOka vaccine (n=208). In the per-protocol set for humoral immune response analysis, the anti-varicella zoster virus IgG antibody response was highest at day 90. At day 90, the seroconversion rates of the low-dose, medium-dose, and high-dose groups of v7D vaccine and the positive control vOka vaccine group were 100·0% (95% CI 95·8-100·0; 87 of 87 participants), 98·9% (93·8-100·0; 87 of 88 participants), 97·8% (92·4-99·7; 91 of 93 participants), and 96·4% (89·8-99·2; 80 of 83 participants), respectively; the GMTs corresponded to values of 30·8 (95% CI 26·2-36·0), 31·3 (26·7-36·6), 28·2 (23·9-33·2), and 38·5 (31·7-46·7). The v7D vaccine, at low dose and medium dose, elicited a humoral immune response similar to that of the vOka vaccine. However, the high-dose v7D vaccine induced a marginally lower GMT compared with the vOka vaccine at day 90 (p=0·027). In the per-protocol set, the three dose groups of the v7D vaccine induced a similar humoral immune response at each timepoint, with no statistically significant differences. The incidence of adverse reactions in the low-dose, medium-dose, and high-dose groups of v7D vaccine was significantly lower than that in the vOka vaccine group (17% [35 of 211 participants], 20% [41 of 210 participants], and 13% [27 of 210 participants] vs 24% [50 of 208 participants], respectively; p=0·025), especially local adverse reactions (10% [22 of 211 participants], 14% [30 of 210 participants] and 9% [18 of 210 participants] vs 18% [38 of 208 participants], respectively; p=0·016). None of the serious adverse events were vaccine related. The three dose groups of the candidate v7D vaccine exhibit similar humoral immunogenicity to the vOka vaccine and are well tolerated. These findings encourage further investigations on two-dose vaccination schedules, efficacy, and the potential safety benefit of v7D vaccine in the future. The National Natural Science Foundation of China, CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and Beijing Wantai. For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Background of Patients Who Received Two Doses of Adjuvanted Herpes Zoster Vaccine at a Clinic and Comparative Evaluation of Local and Systemic Adverse Reactions

Background of Patients Who Received Two Doses of Adjuvanted Herpes Zoster Vaccine at a Clinic and Comparative Evaluation of Local and Systemic Adverse Reactions

Therapy of netakimab in nail psoriasis

Introduction. The nail psoriasis severity does not always correspond to the skin process intensity, but often correlates with a more severe, prolonged and aggressive course of the disease.Materials and methods. 48 adult patients (n = 48) with nail psoriasis were under observation. The severity of the psoriatic lesion of the nails was determined using the NAPSI index (Nail Psoriasis Severity Index). The assessment was carried out before the start of treatment, in the first week, and then every 4 weeks up to and including 52 weeks. The Dermatological Quality of Life Index (DLQI) were determined by questionnaires before the start of treatment, at the 12th and 52nd weeks. All patients on an outpatient basis received netakimab monotherapy at a dose of 120 mg in the form of two subcutaneous injections of 1 ml (60 mg) of the drug, each administered once a week at weeks 0, 1 and 2, then 1 time every 4 weeks. The total duration of treatment for each patient was 52 weeks. The safety of netakimab was evaluated based on the development of adverse events and local reactions to the administration of the drug.Results. The results of the study for 52 weeks showed high efficacy of netakimab. Average NAPSI score improved – 33.1% by the week 12 of treatment and – 72.3% by the week 52 compared to baseline, the quality of their life improved. During the 52 weeks of the study, there were no cases of early withdrawal due to adverse events and cases of serious adverse events.Conclusion. Based on the study results we recommend netakimab for medical use among patients with moderate and severe nail psoriasis.