Localized RhoA Activation Research Articles

Sphingosine-1-phosphate initiates rapid retraction of pseudopodia by localized RhoA activation

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) stimulates sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P)-sensitive motility in NIH3T3 clone7 cells. S1P inhibits motility only when added to the bottom well of the Boyden chamber, suggesting that pseudopodia can respond to their microenvironment. In order to study and localize this effect, we utilized a Transwell insert system to isolate pseudopodia. LPA stimulates protrusion of pseudopodia that are enriched in RhoA compared to cell bodies. Removal of LPA results in slow retraction with loss of vinculin-rich adhesion complexes and prolonged activation of RhoA. However, RhoA, ROCK and mDia are not required for this process. In contrast, rapid retraction, induced by adding S1P to the bottom well, is associated with a quick spike of activated RhoA and coalescence of adhesion complexes that colocalize with the ends of stress fibers. S1P-induced retraction requires RhoA and ROCK but is only delayed by inhibition of mDia. These data indicate that pseudopodia sense and integrate signals initiated by localized bioactive lipids, affecting both cellular polarity and their own function in motility.

GEF-H1 Modulates Localized RhoA Activation during Cytokinesis under the Control of Mitotic Kinases

GEF-H1 Modulates Localized RhoA Activation during Cytokinesis under the Control of Mitotic Kinases

Localized RhoA Activation as a Requirement for the Induction of Membrane Ruffling

We examined the spatio-temporal activity of RhoA in migrating cells and growth factor-stimulated cells by using probes based on the principle of fluorescence resonance energy transfer. In HeLa cells migrating at a low cell density, RhoA was activated both at the contractile tail and at the leading edge. However, RhoA was activated only at the leading edge in MDCK cells migrating as a monolayer sheet. In growth factor-stimulated Cos1 and NIH3T3 cells, the activity of RhoA was greatly decreased at the plasma membrane, but remained high at the membrane ruffles in nascent lamellipodia. These observations are in agreement with the proposed role played by RhoA in stress fiber formation, but they also implicated RhoA in the regulation of membrane ruffling, the induction of which is a typical phenotype of activated Rac. In agreement with this view, dominant negative RhoA was found to inhibit membrane ruffling induced by active Rac. Furthermore, we found that Cdc42 activity was also required for high RhoA activity in membrane ruffles. Finally, we found that mDia1, but not ROCK, was stably associated with membrane ruffles. In conclusion, these results suggested that RhoA cooperates with Rac1 and Cdc42 to induce membrane ruffles via the recruitment of mDia.