Living Donor Liver Transplantation Recipients Research Articles

Neighborhood-level social determinants of health measures independently predict receipt of living donor liver transplantation in the United States.

Disparities exist in the access to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the United States. However, the association of neighborhood-level social determinants of health (SDoH) on the receipt of LDLT is not well-established. This was a retrospective cohort study of adult liver transplant recipients between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2021 at centers performing LDLT using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, which was linked through patients' ZIP code to a set of 24 neighborhood-level SDoH measures from different data sources. Temporal trends and center differences in neighborhood Social Deprivation Index (SDI), a validated scale of socioeconomic deprivation ranging from 0 to 100 (0=least disadvantaged), were assessed by transplant type. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the association of increasing SDI on receipt of LDLT [vs. deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT)]. There were 51,721 DDLT and 4026 LDLT recipients at 59 LDLT-performing centers during the study period. Of the 24 neighborhood-level SDoH measures studied, the SDI was most different between the 2 transplant types, with LDLT recipients having lower SDI (ie, less socioeconomic disadvantage) than DDLT recipients (median SDI 37 vs. 47; p < 0.001). The median difference in SDI between the LDLT and DDLT groups significantly decreased from 13 in 2005 to 3 in 2021 ( p = 0.003). In the final model, the SDI quintile was independently associated with transplant type ( p < 0.001) with a threshold SDI of ~40, above which increasing SDI was significantly associated with reduced odds of LDLT (vs. reference SDI 1-20). As a neighborhood-level SDoH measure, SDI is useful for evaluating disparities in the context of LDLT. Center outreach efforts that aim to reduce disparities in LDLT could preferentially target US ZIP codes with SDI > 40.

High Number of Plasma Exchanges Increases the Risk of Bacterial Infection in ABO-incompatible Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

Bacterial infections are major complications that cause significant mortality and morbidity in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The risk of bacterial infection has not been studied in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) recipients with a desensitization protocol in relation to the number of plasma exchanges (PEs). Therefore, we aimed to analyze the risk of bacterial infection in ABOi LDLT recipients with a high number of PEs compared with recipients with a low number of PEs. A retrospective study was performed with 681 adult LDLT recipients, of whom 171 ABOi LDLT recipients were categorized into the high (n = 52) or low (n = 119) PE groups based on a cutoff value of 6 PE sessions. We compared bacterial infections and postoperative bacteremia within 6 mo after liver transplantation with the ABO-compatible (ABOc) LDLT group (n = 510) as a control group. The high PE group showed a bacterial infection rate of 49.9% and a postoperative bacteremia rate of 28.8%, which were significantly higher than those of the low PE group (31.1%, 17.8%) and the ABOc group (26.7%, 18.0%). In multivariate analysis, the high PE group was found to have a 2.4-fold higher risk of bacterial infection ( P = 0.008). This group presented a lower 5-y survival rate of 58.6% compared with the other 2 groups (81.5% and 78.5%; P = 0.030 and 0.001). A high number of preoperative PEs increases bacterial infection rate and postoperative bacteremia in ABOi LDLT.

Comparison of Fibrinogen Concentrate and Cryoprecipitate on Major Thromboembolic Events after Living Donor Liver Transplantation

(1) Background: Liver transplantation (LT) is associated with significant hemorrhage and massive transfusions. Fibrinogen replacement has a key role in treating massive bleeding during LT and hypofibrinogenemia is treated by fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate. However, these two products are known to be associated with major thromboembolism events (MTEs). We aimed to compare the effect of fibrinogen concentrate and cryoprecipitate on MTEs in living donor LT (LDLT) recipients. (2) Methods: We analyzed 206 patients who underwent LDLT between January 2021 and March 2022. The patients were divided into two groups according to fibrinogen concentrate or cryoprecipitate use. We compared the incidence of MTEs between the two groups. In addition, we performed multiple logistic regression analyses to identify the risk factors for MTEs. (3) Results: There was no significant difference in the incidence of MTEs (16 [14.7%] vs. 14 [14.4%], p = 1.000) between the cryoprecipitate group and fibrinogen concentrate group. In the multivariate analysis, cryoprecipitate (OR 2.09, 95%CI 0.85–5.11, p = 0.107) and fibrinogen concentrate (OR 2.05, 95%CI 0.82–5.12, p = 0.126) were not significantly associated with MTEs. (4) Conclusions: there was no significant difference in the incidence of MTEs between cryoprecipitate and fibrinogen concentrate in LDLT recipients.

Outcomes of living donor liver transplantation recipients with high model for end-stage liver disease score over 35: a Korean national registry study

Outcomes of living donor liver transplantation recipients with high model for end-stage liver disease score over 35: a Korean national registry study

Donor-derived regulatory dendritic cell infusion modulates effector CD8+ T cell and NK cell responses after liver transplantation.

Immune cell-based therapies are promising strategies to facilitate immunosuppression withdrawal after organ transplantation. Regulatory dendritic cells (DCreg) are innate immune cells that down-regulate alloimmune responses in preclinical models. Here, we performed clinical monitoring and comprehensive assessment of peripheral and allograft tissue immune cell populations in DCreg-infused live-donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients up to 12 months (M) after transplant. Thirteen patients were given a single infusion of donor-derived DCreg 1 week before transplant (STUDY) and were compared with 40 propensity-matched standard-of-care (SOC) patients. Donor-derived DCreg infusion was well tolerated in all STUDY patients. There were no differences in postoperative complications or biopsy-confirmed acute rejection compared with SOC patients up to 12M. DCreg administration was associated with lower frequencies of effector T-bet+Eomes+CD8+ T cells and CD16bright natural killer (NK) cells and an increase in putative tolerogenic CD141+CD163+ DCs compared with SOC at 12M. Antidonor proliferative capacity of interferon-γ+ (IFN-γ+) CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was lower compared with antithird party responses in STUDY participants, but not in SOC patients, at 12M. In addition, lower circulating concentrations of interleukin-12p40 (IL-12p40), IFN-γ, and CXCL10 were detected in STUDY participants compared with SOC patients at 12M. Analysis of 12M allograft biopsies revealed lower frequencies of graft-infiltrating CD8+ T cells, as well as attenuation of cytolytic TH1 effector genes and pathways among intragraft CD8+ T cells and NK cells, in DCreg-infused patients. These reductions may be conducive to reduced dependence on immunosuppressive drug therapy or immunosuppression withdrawal.

Outcomes of living donor liver transplant recipients receiving grafts with the Graft-to-Recipient weight ratio less than 0.6%: A matched pair analysis.

We sometimes experience living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) involving very small grafts with graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) <0.6% when the actual graft size is smaller than predicted. The outcomes in this situation have not been fully investigated. The present study aimed to determine the graft outcomes of LDLT with GRWR <0.6%. We retrospectively reviewed 280 cases of adult LDLT performed at our institution between January 2000 and March 2021. In our institution, the lower limit for graft volume/standard liver volume ratio was 30%. The patients were divided into two groups according to the cutoff value of 0.6% for actual GRWR. Graft survival and surgical outcomes including small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) were compared between the groups using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Risk factors associated with SFSS in recipients with GRWR <0.6% were also evaluated. Fifty-nine patients received grafts with GRWR <0.6%. After PSM, similar graft survival rates were observed for GRWR <0.6% (n=53) and GRWR ≥0.6% (n=53) (p=0.98). However, patients with GRWR <0.6% had a significantly worse 3-month graft survival rate (86.8% vs. 98.1%, p=0.03) and higher incidence of SFSS (p<0.001) than patients with GRWR ≥0.6%. On multivariate analysis, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score and donor age were associated with SFSS in patients with GRWR <0.6%. The same factors were also associated with graft survival. In conclusions, although similar overall graft survival rates were observed for LDLT with GRWR <0.6% and GRWR ≥0.6%, GRWR <0.6% was associated with an increased risk of SFSS. Appropriate donor and recipient selection is important for successful LDLT with very small grafts.

Do Respiratory Maneuvers Affect Rght Hepatic Vein Waveform and Maximum Velocity in Post LDLT Recipients?

AIM: Â To evaluate the effect of respiratory maneuvers on right hepatic vein (RHV) Doppler waveform and its maximum velocity in Living donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients. METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study performed at Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute and Research Centre (PKLI&amp; RC), Lahore Radiology department. The sample size of the study, calculated according to WHO sample size calculator, was 30 patients after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Most of these patients were analyzed during their first post-operative week while staying in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU). The Doppler waveform and maximum velocity of RHV were recorded during normal gentle breathing, following breath-hold after deep inspiration and then after quiet expiration. The waveforms that were recorded were triphasic, biphasic, or monophasic in the pattern. To assess the RHV flow quantitatively, the Damping Index was also calculated during all these three respiratory maneuvers as follows (DI=Minimum velocity/maximum velocity) RESULTS: The maximum velocities during normal respiration, after quiet expiration and after breath-holding following deep inspiration were 125 cm/sec, 105 cm/sec and 94 cm/sec. The waveforms observed during gentle breathing were triphasic in 77%, biphasic in 10%, and monophasic in 13% of the patients. After quiet expiration, these were triphasic in 80%, biphasic in 6%, and monophasic in 13% of patients. However, after breath-hold following deep inspiration, the waveforms observed were triphasic in 42%, biphasic in 13%, and monophasic in 45% of the patients. (P &lt;0.008) CONCLUSION: The study showed that not only did the RHV waveforms show significant change from triphasic pattern to monophasic pattern, but also the peak velocities were lower following expiration. Therefore, during the Doppler ultrasound assessment of post-LDLT recipient patients, respiratory variations must be taken into consideration.

Comparing High- and Low-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Living-Donor Liver Transplantation to Determine Clinical Efficacy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (CHALICE Study).

Various studies have demonstrated that low-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients have better outcomes with improved patient survival than deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) recipients. LDLT recipients gain the most from being transplanted at MELD <25-30; however, some existing data have outlined that LDLT may provide equivalent outcomes in high-MELD and low-MELD patients, although the term "high" MELD is arbitrarily defined in the literature and various cut-off scores are outlined between 20 and 30, although most commonly, the dividing threshold is 25. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare LDLT in high-MELD with that in low-MELD recipients to determine patient survival and graft survival, as well as perioperative and postoperative complications. Following PROSPERO registration CRD-42021261501, a systematic database search was conducted for the published literature between 1990 and 2021 and yielded a total of 10 studies with 2183 LT recipients; 490 were HM-LDLT recipients and 1693 were LM-LDLT recipients. Both groups had comparable mortality at 1, 3 and 5 years post-transplant (5-year HR 1.19; 95% CI 0.79-1.79; p-value 0.40) and graft survival (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.72, 1.63; p-value 0.71). No differences were observed in the rates of major morbidity, hepatic artery thrombosis, biliary complications, intra-abdominal bleeding, wound infection and rejection; however, the HM-LDLT group had higher risk for pulmonary infection, abdominal fluid collection and prolonged ICU stay. The high-MELD LDLT group had similar patient and graft survival and morbidities to the low-MELD LDLT group, despite being at higher risk for pulmonary infection, abdominal fluid collection and prolonged ICU stay. The data, primarily sourced from high-volume Asian centers, underscore the feasibility of living donations for liver allografts in high-MELD patients. Given the rising demand for liver allografts, it is sensible to incorporate these insights into U.S. transplant practices.

Long-term survival from progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in living-donor liver transplant recipient with preformed donor-specific antibody

Intensive immunosuppression has enabled liver transplantation even in recipients with preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSA), an independent risk factor for graft rejection. However, these recipients may also be at high risk of progressive multifocal encephalopathy (PML) due to the comorbid immunosuppressed status. A 58-year-old woman presented with self-limited focal-to-bilateral tonic-clonic seizures 9 months after liver transplantation. She was desensitized using rituximab and plasma exchange before transplantation and was subsequently treated with steroids, tacrolimus, and everolimus after transplantation for her preformed DSA. Neurological examination revealed mild acalculia and agraphia. Cranial MRI showed asymmetric, cortex-sparing white matter lesions that increased over a week in the left frontal, left parietal, and right parieto-occipital lobes. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the cerebrospinal fluid for the JC supported the diagnosis of PML. Immune reconstitution by reducing the immunosuppressant dose stopped lesion expansion, and PCR of the cerebrospinal fluid for the JC virus became negative. Graft rejection occurred 2 months after immune reconstitution, requiring readjustment of immunosuppressants. Forty-eight months after PML onset, the patient lived at home without disabling deficits. Intensive immunosuppression may predispose recipients to PML after liver transplantation with preformed DSA. Early immune reconstitution and careful monitoring of graft rejection may help improve outcomes.

Association between visceral obesity and tumor recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma recipients undergoing liver transplantation.

Excessive visceral obesity in recipients of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is associated with mortality, and a recent study reported the correlation between visceral adiposity of male LDLT recipients and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence. However, there is no study on the relationship between the donor's visceral adiposity and surgical outcomes in LDLT recipients. We investigated the association of the visceral-to-subcutaneous fat area ratio (VSR) in donors and recipients with HCC recurrence and mortality in LDLT. We analyzed 1386 sets of donors and recipients who underwent LDLT between January 2008 and January 2018. The maximal chi-square method was used to determine the optimal cutoff values for VSR for predicting overall HCC recurrence and mortality. Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association of donor VSR and recipient VSR with overall HCC recurrence and mortality in recipients. The cutoff values of VSR was determined as 0.73 in males and 0.31 in females. High donor VSR was significantly associated with overall HCC recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.93, p = 0.019) and mortality (HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.03-1.76, p = 0.030). High recipient VSR was significantly associated with overall HCC recurrence (HR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.04-1.88, p = 0.027) and mortality (HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.14-1.96, p = 0.003). Both recipient VSR and donor VSR were significant risk factors for HCC recurrence and mortality in LDLT recipients. Preoperative donor VSR and recipient VSR may be strong predictors of the surgical outcomes of LDLT recipients with HCC.

Effect of Genetic Polymorphism on Clinical Efficacy of Tacrolimus in Adult Living Donor-Liver Transplant Patients

Background and Aim The influence of genetic polymorphism on the clinical outcome including response and safety of immunosuppression in liver transplant (LT) recipients remains controversial among different races and ethnicities, especially for calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). This study aims to evaluate the effect of different genotypes of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the genes encoding CYP3A5 on the therapeutic response to the widely used calcineurin inhibitor; tacrolimus. Method In 49 living donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients with tacrolimus as the backbone immunosuppressive, the rejection, delayed graft function, laboratory evidenced nephrotoxicity, new onset diabetes and hypertension rates were considered the primary therapeutic and safety outcomes of tacrolimus. The biochemical parameters of tacrolimus response and safety as evidence by the status of liver functions, renal functions, complete blood counts and serum electrolytes, as well as the need for Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) were considered the secondary outcomes. Results the rejection and delayed graft function rates didn’t differ significantly among different genotypes (p = 1), similarly; the incidence of new onset diabetes and hypertension didn’t differ significantly among different genotypes (p = 1, and 0.4143 respectively). Moreover; laboratory evidenced nephrotoxicity rates didn’t differ significantly among different genotypes (p = 0.5040). No significant intergenotype differences were observed in the all biochemical outcomes. However the need for MMF was significantly higher among carriers of the CYP3A5*3 allele. Conclusion different genotypes did not offer an advantage over one another in predicting therapeutic response or toxicity of tacrolimus among LDLT recipients.

Exploring safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban after living donor liver transplantation: a retrospective study.

Thromboembolic complications remain a significant concern in postoperative patients, particularly those who have undergone liver transplantation. Warfarin has been the standard oral anticoagulant. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have several advantages over warfarin, including rapid onset of action and standardized dose guidelines. We aimed to assess the safety of rivaroxaban in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients. This study was a single-center, retrospective descriptive analysis of LDLT recipients who received rivaroxaban between December 2020 and April 2022. A total of 27 recipients received rivaroxaban postoperatively. Liver function tests, immunosuppression levels, serum creatinine, and INR were recorded before the initiation of rivaroxaban and then on post-therapy days 1, 7, 14, 28, 90, and 180. Among the 27 recipients receiving rivaroxaban postoperatively, portal venous thrombosis was the most prevalent indication for anticoagulation (44.4%), followed by Budd-Chiari syndrome (29.6%). Nine patients had a twofold increase in either ALT or AST values, two of whom were treated for biliary strictures and the others for rejection. Eighteen patients were given tacrolimus, and eight were on cyclosporine, with one patient switched from tacrolimus to cyclosporine due to insufficient therapeutic levels. There were no incidents of bleeding or re-thrombosis during the 180-day follow-up period. Rivaroxaban may be a safe and effective alternative in LDLT recipients with no significant adverse incidents. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these findings and determine this population's optimal dose and duration of rivaroxaban therapy.

Increasing practice and acceptable outcomes of high-MELD living donor liver transplantation in the USA.

Recent deceased-donor allocation changes in the United States may have increased high-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT); however, outcomes in these patients remain poorly defined. We aimed to examine the impact of the MELD score on LDLT outcomes. Using UNOS data (January 1, 2010-December 31, 2021), LDLT recipients were identified and stratified into low-MELD (<15), intermediate-MELD (15-24), and high-MELD (≥25) groups. We compared outcomes between MELD-stratified LDLT groups and between MELD-stratified LDLT and donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to compare graft survival rates and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling to identify factors associated with graft outcomes. Of 3558 LDLTs, 1605 (45.1%) were low-MELD, 1616 (45.4%) intermediate-MELD, and 337 (9.5%) high-MELD. Over the study period, the annual number of LDLTs increased from 282 to 569, and the proportion of high-MELD LDLTs increased from 3.9% to 7.7%. Graft survival was significantly higher in low-MELD versus high-MELD LDLT recipients (adjusted HR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.03-1.79); however, 5-year survival exceeded 70.0% in both groups. We observed no significant difference in graft survival between high-MELD LDLT and high-MELD donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients (adjusted HR: 1.25, 95% CI:0.99-1.58), with a 5-year survival of 71.5% and 77.3%, respectively. Low LDLT center volume (<3 LDLTs/year) and recipient life support requirement were both associated with inferior graft outcomes among high-MELD LDLT recipients. While higher MELD scores confer graft failure risk in LDLT, high-MELD LDLT outcomes are acceptable with similar outcomes to MELD-stratified donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients. Future practice guidance should consider the expansion of LDLT recommendations to high-MELD recipients in centers with expertise to help reduce donor shortage.

Sex and racial disparities in living donor liver transplantation in the United States.

Sex and racial disparities in deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) have been described, but this has not been well studied in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We aim to examine these disparities in the US LDLT population and identify potential predictors of these differences. From 2002 to 2021, the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network database was queried to characterize the adult LDLT population and evaluate differences between LDLT and DDLT recipients with regard to sex and race. Donor demographics, Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD), and socioeconomic data were all included. Of the 4961 LDLT and 99,984 DDLT recipients, males received the majority of LDLT (55% vs. 45%, p < 0.001) and DDLT (67% vs. 33%, p < 0.001) compared to females. There was a significant difference in race between male and female LDLT recipients ( p < 0.001); 84% of male recipients were White and 78% of females. In both groups, females had lower levels of education and were less likely to have private insurance. There were more female living donors (N = 2545, 51%); 50% of female donors donated to males but only 40% of males donated to females. Donor-recipient relationships varied significantly by sex ( p < 0.001); males received more donations from spouses (62% vs. 39%) and siblings (60% vs. 40%). In the LDLT population, significant disparities exist with respect to sex and race that disadvantage women, but these disparities are less pronounced than in the DDLT population. Although further studies are needed, complex clinical and socioeconomic differences as well as donor factors may explain these variations.

Changes in Serum Bone Metabolism Markers after Living Donor Liver Transplantation (LDLT) and Their Association with Fracture Occurrences.

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is lifesaving, but can lead to osteoporosis and fractures. In our 3-year study of 25 LDLT recipients, we observed significant reductions in lumbar spine and femoral neck T scores, along with bone resorption marker reductions and liver regeneration marker increases. Serum calcium levels increased, while osteoprotegerin (OPG) decreased and Dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK-1) increased. Patients who suffered fractures within 3 years of LDLT had higher serum OPG, lower serum nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL), a higher OPG/RANKL ratio and higher serum DKK-1 levels. OPG, RANKL, OPG/RANKL ratio and DKK-1 levels before LDLT predicted hip or spine fractures within three years after LDLT. Further research is necessary to determine the optimal level of osteoclastic activity for preventing fracture onset.

#3988 MARS – A NOVEL SCORE TO PREDICT THE RISK OF ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY AFTER LIVING DONOR LIVER TRANSPLANT

Abstract Background and Aims Acute kidney injury is common in liver transplant recipients with adverse effect on graft and patient outcomes. There are many studies on incidence, risk factors and outcomes of AKI post-LT in deceased donors, there is paucity of data about AKI in living donor liver transplant recipients (LDLT). LDLT is a difficult and prolonged surgery with inherent risk to donors, so it practised in only few centres across the world however there is little data of AKI in living donor liver transplant recipients (LDLT). Method This prospective observational study was undertaken to assess incidence, risk factors, patient graft outcomes and to develop a novel prediction model to identify recipients at risk for post-transplant AKI at the earliest possible time point after living donor liver transplantation in a tertiary care large volume centre in northern India. Results Incidence of AKI in our study was 31.7% with 13.5% requiring renal replacement therapy. Male gender, history of hepatorenal syndrome, use of intraoperative inotropes (Indicating Post reperfusion injury), MELD score &amp;gt;14, preoperative proteinuria &amp;gt;0.5 gram/day &amp; estimated GFR &amp;lt;90 ml/min/1.73 m2 were significant risk factors for AKI within 1 month post-LDLT in logistic regression model. We devised a risk prediction score (The MARS score) which had a sensitivity of 81.36%, specificity of 88.19%, positive predictive value of 76.9%, negative predictive value of 91.06% and overall accuracy of 86.02% to predict AKI. AKI was associated with longer hospital stay, higher mortality and led to higher occurrence of chronic kidney disease after a median follow up period of 724 (635 – 794) days. Conclusion Our risk model (MARS) with an AUC of 0.925 performed better than all previously reported scores in DDLT &amp; LDLT .The variables in our AKI risk prediction are simple to extract and use making it favourable in resource limited settings where access to newer biomarkers of kidney injury is limited. There is a need to apply the score in other cohorts to validate its applicability.

Administration of magnesium sulphate does not prevent post-reperfusion syndrome but is necessary during living donor liver transplantation.

Severe hemodynamic instability is observed during portal vein de-clamping in the form of post-reperfusion syndrome in liver transplantation. The protective effect of magnesium on inflammation and ischemia-reperfusion injuries of various organs is evident, but its role in the prevention of post-reperfusion syndrome in liver transplantation is not clear. We investigated the effect of magnesium sulphate on the incidence of post-reperfusion syndrome during living donor liver transplantation. The secondary outcomes were the requirement of vasopressor boluses and levels of serum magnesium, lactate and serum C-reactive protein. Seventy living donor liver transplant recipients were randomized into a magnesium (M) group (n=35) or normal saline (N) group (n=35). The patients in group M received 35mg/kg of magnesium sulphate, 30 minutes after the beginning of the anhepatic phase, and patients in group N received normal saline. The incidence of post-reperfusion syndrome in group M and group N was 34.29% and 40%, respectively, with no significant difference. The requirement for rescue vasopressor boluses and levels of C-reactive protein and lactate were also comparable between the two groups. However, the incidence of hypomagnesemia at the end of surgery was significantly higher in group N (37.1% vs. 14.28%, p=0.027). Magnesium does not appear to prevent post-reperfusion syndrome. However, hypomagnesemia is more frequently seen during liver transplantation. Hence, serum magnesium should be routinely monitored and administered during liver transplantation.

Variation of Normal Portal Venous Doppler Indices in Post-Operative Period Following Living Donor Liver Transplant

Objective: To investigate the variations in normal Doppler indices of the portal vein during the post-operative period following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Methodology: This retrospective cohort study was carried out at Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute and Research Centre from July 1 to December 31 2021. It included all adult patients over 16 years of age who underwent Living Donor Liver Transplant (LDLT). Triplex Doppler ultrasound of LDLT recipients was performed intraoperatively and postoperatively for 5 consecutive days. Subsequent scans were performed at 2 weeks, 4 months, and 6 months after the transplant. Portal vein velocities were taken at the extrahepatic part, anastomosis, and intrahepatic part. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20. Results: The study involved 91 patients, with ages ranging from 17 to 73 years and a mean age of 44.9 years. Among the recipients, 79% were male and 21% were female. The portal venous velocities varied between 31 cm/s and 357 cm/s. All patients had antegrade portal venous flow. The portal venous velocities normalized within 4-6 months following LDLT. Conclusion: A wide range of portal venous velocities can be encountered following LDLT without clinically significant outcome and these usually normalize within 4-6 months following LDLT.

A third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine sufficiently improves the neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 variants in liver transplant recipients.

We examined the neutralizing antibody production efficiency of the second and third severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine doses (2nd- and 3rd-dose) and neutralizing activity on mutant strains, including, the Ancestral, Beta and Omicron strains using green fluorescent protein-carrying recombinant SARS-CoV-2, in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients. The patients who were administered vaccines other than Pfizer- BioNTechBNT162b2 and who had coronavirus disease 2019 in this study period were excluded. We enrolled 154 LDLT recipients and 50 healthy controls. The median time were 21 days (between 1st and 2nd vaccination) and 244 days (between 2nd and 3rd vaccination). The median neutralizing antibody titer after 2nd-dose was lower in LDLT recipients than in controls (0.46 vs 1.00, P<0.0001). All controls had SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies, whereas 39 LDLT recipients (25.3%) had no neutralizing antibodies after 2nd-dose; age at vaccination, presence of ascites, multiple immunosuppressive treatments, and mycophenolate mofetil treatment were significant risk factors for nonresponder. The neutralizing activities of recipient sera were approximately 3-fold and 5-fold lower than those of control sera against the Ancestral and Beta strains, respectively. The median antibody titer after 3rd-dose was not significantly different between recipients and controls (1.02 vs 1.22, p=0.0758); only 5% recipients was non-responder. The neutralizing activity after third dose to Omicron strains were enhanced and had no significant difference between two groups. Only the 2nd-dose was not sufficiently effective in recipients; however, 3rd-dose had sufficient neutralizing activity against the mutant strain and was as effective as that in healthy controls.

Impact of living donor liver transplantation on long-term cardiometabolic and graft outcomes in cirrhosis due to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a leading indication for liver transplantation (LT). This study aimed to determine whether living donor LT (LDLT) recipients experienced less recurrent NASH, cirrhosis, and cardiometabolic complications compared to deceased donor LT (DDLT). Patients with LDLT and DDLT for NASH between February 2002 and May 2018 at University Health Network (UHN) were compared. Cox Proportional Hazard model was used to analyze overall survival (OS), Fine and Gray's Competing Risk models were conducted to analyze cumulative incidence of post LT outcomes. One hundred and ninety-nine DDLTs and 66 LDLTs were performed for NASH cirrhosis. Time and rate of recurrence of NAFLD and NASH were comparable in both groups. Graft cirrhosis was more common in DDLT recipients (n=14) versus LDLT (n=0) (p<.0001). Significant fibrosis (Fibrosis≥F2) developed in 50 recipients (12 LDLT and 38 DDLT) post LT (DDLT vs. LDLT: HR=1.00, 95% CI=(.52-1.93), p=.91) and there was no difference in time to significant fibrosis (p=.57). There was no difference in development of post-transplant diabetes, dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, and cancers. LDLT group had better renal function at 10years (MDRD eGFR of 57.0mL/min vs. 48.5mL/min, p=.047). Both groups had a comparable OS (HR=1.83 (95% CI=.92-3.62), p=.08). Overall, LDLT recipients had significantly better renal function by virtue of having early transplantation in their disease course. LDLT was also associated with significantly less graft cirrhosis, although OS and cardiometabolic outcomes were comparable between LDLT and DDLT.