Liver Transplant Recipients Research Articles

Baseline lung allograft dysfunction after bilateral deceased-donor lung transplantation: A single-center experience in Japan

BackgroundBaseline lung allograft dysfunction (BLAD) refers to a condition in which a lung transplant recipient does not achieve normal pulmonary function (i.e., forced expiratory volume in 1 s or forced vital capacity of <80% of predicted values). Although BLAD is reportedly associated with a poor prognosis, the condition has not been examined in Japanese patients. MethodsIn this study, we retrospectively examined 38 Japanese adults who underwent bilateral lung transplantation from 2015 to 2022 in a single center. ResultsTwenty-one (55%) patients met the criteria for BLAD. No significant differences were found in recipient or donor factors between the BLAD and non-BLAD groups, but the donor–recipient ratio of the predicted vital capacity was lower in the BLAD group (p = 0.009). The intensive care unit length of stay, ventilator duration, and blood loss during transplant surgery were significantly higher in the BLAD group (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found in survival. The median observation period was significantly shorter in the BLAD than non-BLAD group (744 vs.1192 days, respectively; p = 0.031). The time to reach the normal threshold of pulmonary function after lung transplantation varied among the patients, ranging from 6 months to 4 years. ConclusionsThe characteristics of these Japanese patients with BLAD were similar to those of other patients in previous reports. The effects of the observation period and donor–recipient age discrepancy on BLAD require further exploration.

Normothermic regional perfusion in controlled DCD liver procurement: Outcomes of the Swedish national implementation protocol.

Liver transplantation (LTX) using donors after controlled circulatory death (cDCD) is associated with poorer graft survival and increased incidence of nonanastomotic biliary strictures (NASs) compared to livers procured from brain-dead donors (DBD). The use of normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) during cDCD procurement may improve posttransplant outcomes and reduce the incidence of NAS. In Sweden, cDCD LTX was introduced through a national pilot protocol with mandatory NRP. This study aims to evaluate the outcome of cDCD LTX during the pilot period. Donor and recipient data were collected on all cDCD liver transplants during the pilot period between January 2020 to December 2022. Outcome on NAS, patient and graft survival, early allograft dysfunction, acute kidney injury, and comprehensive complication index was compared to a matched cohort of 28 patients transplanted with a DBD liver between 2018 and 2022. Eighteen patients were transplanted with a liver from a cDCD donor after using NRP. The mean functional warm ischemia time was 29 ± 6 minutes. The mean lactate reduction during NRP was 8.7 ± 2.4mmol/L, and the end NRP perfusate alanine aminotransferase was 1.4 ± 1µkat/L. When comparing recipients of cDCD liver transplant to DBD, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of NAS, patient and graft survival, comprehensive complication index, early allograft dysfunction, or acute kidney injury. Study protocol magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in cDCD patients showed no signs of subclinical biliary strictures. Evaluation of the Swedish national pilot of cDCD LTX with mandatory NRP shows comparable outcomes to a matched DBD cohort with 94.4% 1-year patient and graft survival and no incidence of NAS within the first year.

Predictive Parameters for Hospital Admission Among Liver Transplant Recipients Presenting to the Emergency Department: A 5-Year Study

Predictive Parameters for Hospital Admission Among Liver Transplant Recipients Presenting to the Emergency Department: A 5-Year Study

Bile lakes in patients with biliary atresia who presented with jaundice-free native liver survival indicating the risk of subsequent liver transplantation due to various factors

PurposeThe prognostic factors of subsequent liver transplantation (LT) in patients with biliary atresia (BA) who presented with jaundice-free native liver survival were investigated.MethodsThis study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent portoenterostomy (PE) for BA. Patients with jaundice-free native liver survival at 1 year postoperatively were divided into the autologous liver survivor and liver transplant recipient groups. Peri- and postoperative data were compared between the two groups.ResultsAmong 97 patients with BA, 29 who received LT within 1 year after PE were excluded from the analysis. Further, 48 patients currently living with native liver and 20 who received LT after 1 year postoperatively were compared. Bile lake (BL) was the strongest risk factor of LT. The risk score was 2.38∗BLscore+0.00466∗TBA\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$2.38*BLscore+0.00466*TBA$$\\end{document}, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.83. Patients with BL and those without significantly differed in terms of the native liver survival rate. Patients with BL who presented with not only cholangitis but also gastrointestinal hemorrhage and hepatopulmonary syndrome received LT.ConclusionBL can cause different pathologies. Moreover, it is an evident risk factor of subsequent LT in patients with BA who are living with native liver at 1 year after PE.

Improved outcomes of ABO-incompatible living donor liver transplant with biologically related donors.

Liver transplantation is considered to be the only curative treatment for decompensated liver disease. Shortage of liver allografts is a major impediment to the widespread application of this procedure. ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) grafts have been used successfully, thereby increasing the living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) donor pool. However, ABO-I liver transplantation is associated with complications like acute liver rejection, hepatic artery thrombosis, and higher biliary stricture rates, leading to transplant failure, retransplantations, or sepsis-related complications. Various desensitization strategies have been adopted to improve outcomes. Biologically related donor-recipient pairs have the theoretical advantage of favorable HLA (human leukocyte antigen) match. We have analyzed the outcomes of ABO-I LDLT and compared the results of HLA-matched (biologically related) and HLA-unmatched (biologically unrelated) donor-recipient pairs. Retrospective data of 90 cases of ABO-I liver transplant recipients: HLA-matched (n = 35) and HLA-unmatched (n = 55) for comparison of preoperative and postoperative data. Peak bilirubin levels in HLA-unmatched recipients were higher. Platelet count was lower than HLA-matched recipients (7.3 vs. 8.9mg/dL). No significant difference in days-to-normal bilirubin, peak International Normalised Ratio, hospital stay, and discharge-day from transplant between both groups. Postoperatively, HLA-unmatched recipients required more pulse-steroids therapy than HLA-matched: 21/55 (38.2%) versus 11/35 (31.4%). Biliary complications and interventions were more prevalent in the HLA-unmatched group (12/55, 21.8%) than in the HLA-matched group (4/35, 11.4%). Renal complications requiring postoperative hemodialysis were more prevalent in the HLA-unmatched group than the HLA-matched group (9/55 [16.4%] vs. 3/35 [8.6%]). The incidence of vascular complications was similar. ABO-I LDLT is an effective and safe method for increasing the donor pool in the absence of an ABO-compatible liver donor. Long-term outcomes of recipients with biologically related donors are marginally better than biologically unrelated ABO-I LDLT recipients. However, the incidence of antibody-mediated graft rejection and biliary complications is higher in biologically unrelated ABO-I liver recipients.

Etiology-Specific Effects of Impaired Functional Status on Liver Transplant Outcomes.

Pre-liver transplant (LT) functional status is an important determinant of prognosis post LT. There is insufficient data on how functional status affects outcomes of transplant recipients based on the specific etiology of liver disease. We stratified LT recipients by etiology of liver disease to evaluate the effects of functional status on post-LT prognosis in each subgroup. 2005-2019 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) was used to select patients with liver transplant. A total of 14,290 patients were included in the analysis. These patients were stratified by functional status according to Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score: no assistance, some assistance, or total assistance. They were then further divided into six diagnosis categories: metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), hereditary disorders, hepatitis C, hepatitis B, autoimmune disease (AID), and alcoholic liver disease (ALD). Primary endpoints included all-cause mortality and graft failure, while secondary endpoints included organ-specific causes of death. Those under the age of 18 and those with non-whole liver or prior liver transplantation were excluded. Patients with MASLD requiring some assistance (aHR: 1.57, 95% CI 1.03-2.39, p = 0.04) and those requiring total assistance (aHR: 2.32, 95% CI 1.48-3.64, p < 0.001) had higher incidences of graft failure compared to those requiring no assistance. Those with MASLD requiring total assistance had a higher all-cause mortality rate than those needing no assistance (aHR: 1.62, 95% CI 1.38-1.89, p < 0.001). Patients with hereditary causes of liver disease showed a lower incidence of all-cause mortality in recipients needing some assistance compared with those needing no assistance (aHR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.34-0.80, p = 0.003). LT recipients with hepatitis C, AID, and ALD all showed higher incidences of all-cause mortality in the total assistance cohort when compared to the no assistance cohort. For the secondary endpoints of specific cause of death, transplant recipients with MASLD needing total assistance had higher rates of death due to general cardiac causes, graft rejection, general infectious causes, sepsis, general renal causes, and general respiratory causes. Patients with MASLD cirrhosis demonstrated the worst overall outcomes, suggesting that this population may be particularly vulnerable. Poor functional status in patients with end-stage liver disease from hepatitis B or hereditary disease was not associated with a significantly increased rate of adverse outcomes, suggesting that the KPS score may not be broadly applicable to all patients awaiting LT.

Does body weight below 6 kg modify survival of infants after liver transplant? Complete National Transplant Registry Data.

To determine the impact of infant recipient body weight at primary liver transplantation (LT) on both recipient and graft survival rates in complete national data from Poland. We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study including 142 LT recipients below 1 year of age with body weights below 10 kg who received primary and isolated LT between 2001 and 2017. Patients were divided into two study groups according to body weight at the time of LT: (1) Group I (≤6.0 kg, 32 patients) and (2) Group II (6.1-9.9 kg, 110 patients). Independent impact of body weight on patient and graft survival were assessed using survival curves and a multivariable Cox regression analysis. The univariate predictors of mortality or retransplantation at 1 year post-LT were recipient body weight of ≤6 kg at transplantation, pediatric end-stage liver disease score, urgent LT, graft from deceased donor, cold ischemia time, post-LT hepatic artery thrombosis, and post-LT dialysis. No statistically significant impact of body weight ≤6 kg on 1-year failure-free survival was found based on the multivariable analysis (p = 0.063). Body weight ≤6 kg was associated with longer post-LT intensive care unit and post-LT hospital stays (p = 0.013 and 0.025, respectively). Since no evidence of independent negative impact of recipient body weight ≤6 kg on failure-free survival 1 year post-LT was found, LT in infants with end-stage liver disease in Poland should be performed according to medical indications and urgency when an appropriate donor is available.

What is said about #donateliver or #liverdonor? Reflexive thematic analysis of Twitter (X) posts from 2012 to 2022

BackgroundThere is sustained interest in understanding the perspectives of liver transplant recipients and living donors, with several qualitative studies shedding light on this emotionally charged subject. However, these studies have relied primarily on traditional semi-structured interviews, which, while valuable, come with inherent limitations. Consequently, there remains a gap in our comprehension of the broader public discourse surrounding living liver donation. This study aims to bridge this gap by delving into public conversations related to living liver donation through a qualitative analysis of Twitter (now X) posts, offering a fresh perspective on this critical issue.MethodsTo compile a comprehensive dataset, we extracted original tweets containing the hashtags “#donateliver” OR “#liverdonor”, all posted in English from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2022. We then selected tweets from individual users whose Twitter (X) accounts featured authentic human names, ensuring the credibility of our data. Employing Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis approach, the study investigators read and analysed the included tweets, identifying two main themes and six subthemes. The Health Policy Triangle framework was applied to understand the roles of different stakeholders involved in the discourse and suggest areas for policy improvement.ResultsA total of 361 unique tweets from individual users were analysed. The major theme that emerged was the persistent shortage of liver donors, underscoring the desperation faced by individuals in need of life-saving liver transplants and the urgency of addressing the organ shortage problem. The second theme delved into the experiences of liver donors post-surgery, shedding light on a variety of aspects related to the transplantation process, including the visibility of surgical scars, and the significance of returning to physical activity and exercise post-surgery.ConclusionThe multifaceted experiences of individuals involved in the transplantation process, both recipients and donors, should be further studied in our efforts to improve the critical shortage of liver donors.

Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab as SARS-CoV-2 Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Lung Transplant Recipients during the Omicron Wave: A Real-World Monocentric Experience.

Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) respond poorly to vaccination. SARS-CoV-2 pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tixagevimab/cilgavimab (TIX/CIL) reduces the incidence of infection and the evolution to severe COVID-19. In vitro data show decreased activity against Omicron variants. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of TIX/CIL in LTRs during the Omicron wave. A prospective observational cohort study was conducted at ISMETT in Palermo (Italy). In June 2022, SARS-CoV-2 PrEP with TIX/CIL 150/150 mg was offered to LTRs. LTRs who received TIX/CIL were compared to LTRs who did not. Logistic regression analysis (adjusted for prior COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, age, years from transplant, and rejection) was performed. The objective of this study was to compare the following among the two populations: prevalence of SARS-CoV-2, length of SARS-CoV-2 positivity, and COVID-19 disease severity. Among 110 eligible LTRs, 79 (72%) received TIX/CIL and 31 (28%) did not. SARS-CoV-2 infections occurred in 6% (n = 5) of patients who received TIX/CIL and 29% (n = 9) of patients who did not (p < 0.001). In both groups, infections were mild/asymptomatic, and no one was hospitalized or died. At multivariate analysis, TIX/CIL was associated with a lower risk of infection (aOR 0.22; 95%CI 0.06-0.78; p = 0.02). TIX/CIL was safe and effective in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 in LTRs during the Omicron wave.

Immunosuppression in adult liver transplant recipients: a 2024 update from the Italian Liver Transplant Working Group.

Advances in surgical procedures and immunosuppressive therapies have considerably improved the outcomes of patients who have undergone liver transplantation in the past few decades. In 2020, the Italian Liver Transplant Working Group published practice-oriented algorithms for immunosuppressive therapy (IT) in adult liver transplant (LT) recipients. Due to the rapidly evolving LT field, regular updates to the recommendations are required. This review presents a consensus- and evidence-based update of the 2020 recommendations. The Italian Liver Transplant Working Group set out to address new IT issues, which were discussed based on supporting literature and the specialists' personal experiences. The panel deliberated on and graded each statement before consensus was reached. A series of consensus statements were formulated and finalized on: (i) oncologic indications for LT; (ii) management of chronic LT rejection; (iii) combined liver-kidney transplantation; (iv) immunosuppression for transplantation with an organ donated after circulatory death; (v) transplantation in the presence of frailty and sarcopenia; and (vi) ABO blood group incompatibility between donor and recipient. Algorithms were updated in the following LT groups: standard patients, critical patients, oncology patients, patients with specific etiology, and patients at high immunologic risk. A steroid-free approach was generally recommended, except for patients with autoimmune liver disease and those at high immunologic risk. The updated consensus- and evidence-based 2024 recommendations for immunosuppression regimens in adult patients with ABO-compatible LT address a range of clinical variables that should be considered to optimize the choice of the immunosuppression treatment in clinical practice in Italy.

Augmented humoral response to third and fourth dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in lung transplant recipients

BackgroundSince lung transplant recipients (LTRs) exhibit low immunogenicity after two doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines, optimal vaccine strategies for SARS-CoV-2 are required in LTRs. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the third and fourth doses of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in LTRs. MethodsWe conducted a single-center study of 73 LTRs and 23 healthy controls (HCs). Participants received two-to-four doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. The LTRs were divided into three groups based on the number of vaccine dose. IgG titers against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were measured, and adverse events were assessed. Factors associated with humoral response were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. ResultsThe Dose 4 group (n = 27) had a higher humoral response rate (P = 0.018) and higher levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody (P = 0.04) than the Dose 2 group (n = 14). The Dose 3 group (n = 32) had lower humoral response rates (P = 0.005) and levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody (P = 0.0005) than the HCs (n = 23) even after the same dose. Systemic adverse events were milder in the LTRs than in the HCs (P < 0.05). Increased number of vaccine dose was identified as a predictor of positive humoral response (P = 0.021). ConclusionBooster doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines may enhance humoral response with mild adverse events in LTRs. Repeated vaccination might be warranted for LTRs to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Epstein-Barr virus qPCR testing on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from immunocompromised patients

BackgroundEpstein-Barr Virus (EBV) is associated with lung disease in immunocompromised patients, particularly transplant recipients. EBV DNA testing of lower respiratory tract specimens may have diagnostic utility. MethodsThis was a retrospective, observational study of all patients with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids submitted for EBV qPCR testing from February 2016 to June 2022 at the Stanford Clinical Virology Laboratory. ResultsThere were 140 patients that underwent 251 EBV qPCR BAL tests (median 1; range 1 – 10). These patients had a mean age of 15.9 years (standard deviation, 15.1 years) and 50 % were female. Transplant recipients accounted for 67.1 % (94/140) of patients, including 67.0 % (63/94) solid organ transplant (SOT) and 33.0 % (31/94) hematopoietic cell transplant. Diagnostic testing was performed more commonly than surveillance testing [57.0 % (143/251) v. 43.0 % (108/251)]; 96.2 % (104/108) of surveillance samples were from lung transplant recipients. Excluding internal control failures, 34.7 % (83/239) of BAL had detectable EBV DNA, encompassing a wide range of viral loads (median=3.03 log10 IU/mL, range 1.44 to 6.06). Overall agreement of EBV DNA in BAL compared to plasma was 74.1 % [117/158; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 66.5 % to 80.7 %], with a kappa coefficient of 0.44 (95 % CI: 0.30 to 0.57). Only 20.1 % (48/239) of results were discussed in a subsequent clinical note, and one result (0.4 %; 1/239) changed clinical management. ConclusionsEBV qPCR testing on BAL offers limited clinical impact. Additional biomarkers are required to improve the diagnosis of EBV-associated lung diseases.

The Survival Benefit of Reabstinence After Harmful Alcohol Use Following Early Liver Transplant for Severe Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis: A Multicenter ACCELERATE Study.

Early (i.e., without mandated period of abstinence) liver transplant (LT) for alcohol-associated hepatitis is the fastest-growing indication for LT in the United States and Europe. Harmful alcohol use after LT is associated with poor outcomes, but the distinction of establishing abstinence after return to drinking (i.e., reabstinence) is understudied. This study aims to characterize the survival outcomes of achieving reabstinence after post-LT harmful alcohol use. We analyzed early LT recipients from 12 US LT centers between 2006 and 2021. Post-LT alcohol use was characterized as harmful using criteria of "binge" (≥5 [men] or ≥4 [women] drinks in < 24 hours) or "frequent" (≥4 days in one week) by interview or phosphatidylethanol >20 ng/mL. Reabstinence was defined as ≥12 consecutive months without harmful alcohol use after harmful alcohol use. Among 347 LT recipients (64% male, median age 43, median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium score 38) with median post-LT follow-up of 2.2 years (interquartile interval 1.1-3.6), 276 (80%) recipients had no evidence of harmful alcohol use, 35 (10%) recipients had reabstinence, and 36 (10%) recipients had continued harmful alcohol use without reabstinence. Five-year predicted survival, adjusted for age, sex, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium score, was lowest among LT recipients with continued harmful alcohol use (77%), but similar among those with no harmful use (93%) and reabstinence (94%). Achieving reabstinence after post-LT harmful alcohol use is associated with similar 5-year post-LT survival compared with those without evidence of post-LT harmful alcohol use. Our findings highlight the importance of early detection and treatment of post-LT alcohol use.

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates Recovered from Liver Transplant Recipients: A Comparative Analysis Before and After the Surgery

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates Recovered from Liver Transplant Recipients: A Comparative Analysis Before and After the Surgery

Perioperative Fluid Management in Paediatric Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Perioperative fluid management remains a challenging aspect of paediatric liver transplantation (LT) because of the risk of postoperative complications and haemodynamic instability. Limited research has specifically investigated the impact of fluid management and transfusion on mortality and morbidity in pediatric LT patients. This systematic review summarizes the evidence regarding perioperative fluid management and its clinical outcomes in paediatric LT patients. All primary studies published in English evaluating perioperative fluid management in paediatric LT patients were eligible. PubMed, EBSCOHost, Embase, Proquest, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception to December 19, 2023. Risks of bias were assessed using the Joanna-Briggs Institute checklist. The results were synthesized narratively. Five retrospective cohort studies of good-excellent quality were included in this review. Two studies evaluated intraoperative fluid administration, one study compared postoperative fluid balance (FB) with outcomes, and two studies compared massive versus non-massive transfusion. A higher mortality rate was associated with intravenous lactated ringer's (LR) than with normal saline, but not with massive transfusion (MT). Longer hospital stays were correlated with MT, >20% positive FB in the first 72 hours, and greater total intraoperative blood product administration. Higher intraoperative fluid administration was associated with a greater thrombotic risk. Additionally, intraoperative MT and lR infusion were associated with an increased risk of 30-day graft loss and graft dysfunction, respectively. Fluid management may impact the outcomes of paediatric LT recipients. These findings underscore the need for more studies to explore the best fluid management and evaluation strategies for children undergoing LT.

COVID-19 Vaccine in Lung and Liver Transplant Recipients Exceeds Expectations: An Italian Real-Life Experience on Immunogenicity and Clinical Efficacy of BNT162b2 Vaccine.

This study assessed humoral and T cell-mediated immune responses to the BNT162b2 vaccine in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) and lung transplant (LUT) recipients who received three doses of the vaccine from March 2021 at our institution. Serum samples were collected 60days post-second and third dose to quantify antibodies against the spike region of SARS-CoV-2 while whole blood samples were collected to analyze the SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response using an IFN-γ ELISpot assay. We enrolled 244 OLT and 120 LUT recipients. The third dose increased antibody titres in OLT recipients (from a median value of 131 after the second dose to 5523 IU/mL, p < 0.001) and LUT recipients (from 14.8 to 1729 IU/mL, p < 0.001). T-cell response also increased in OLT recipients (from 8.5 to 23 IFN-γ SFU per 250,000 PBMC, p < 0.001) and LUT recipients (from 8 to 15 IFN-γ SFU per 250,000 PBMC, p < 0.001). A total of 128 breakthrough infections were observed: two (0.8%) OLT recipients were hospitalized due to COVID-19 and one died (0.4%); among LUT recipients, seven were hospitalized (5.8%) and two patients died (1.7%). In conclusion, the three-dose schedule of the BNT162b2 vaccine elicited both humoral and T cell-mediated responses in solid organ transplant recipients. The risk of severe COVID-19 post-vaccination was low in this population.

Use of letermovir for cytomegalovirus primary prophylaxis in lung transplant recipients.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a driver of negative outcomes after lung transplant (LTX) and primary prophylaxis (PPX) with valganciclovir (VGC) is standard-of-care. VGC is associated with myelosuppression, prompting interest in letermovir (LTV). Adults receiving LTX between April 1, 2015, and July 30, 2022, at our institution were evaluated. Patients were excluded if low CMV risk (D-/R-), survived <90 days post-LTX, or transferred care before PPX withdrawal. Primary outcomes were leukopenia (white blood cell count [WBC] ≤ 3.0×109/L), severe leukopenia (WBC ≤ 2.0×109/L), and neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count ≤ 1500 cells/µL) requiring granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) on PPX. Secondary outcomes included breakthrough CMV infection and post-PPX CMV infection. 204 patients met inclusion criteria: 175 patients on VGC and 29 patients on LTV (after VGC conversion). Most patients received bilateral LTX (62.7%) with non-lymphocyte-depleting induction (96.6%) and moderate-risk serostatus (D+/R+, 48.5%). Patients transitioned from VGC to LTV after a mean of 178 days (SD 80.8 days) post-transplant. Patients on VGC experienced significantly more leukopenia (82.3%vs. 58.6%, p = 0.008), severe leukopenia (57.1%vs. 31.0%, p = 0.016), and neutropenia requiring GCSF (70.9%vs. 51.7%, p = 0.048). Breakthrough (5.7%vs. 3.4%, p = 0.955) and post-PPX (24.6%vs. 37.9%, p = 0.199) infections were similar. A subgroup analysis of patients with high-risk serostatus showed similar trends, though did not reach statistical significance. In this single-center study, the incidence of leukopenia and neutropenia requiring GCSF were reduced with LTV compared to VGC. Breakthrough and post-PPX infections were not significantly different. This evidence suggests that LTV has comparable efficacy with reduced myelosuppression compared to VGC in LTX recipients, and may be an appropriate alternative for PPX.

Custom silicone Y-stents for the management of anastomotic stenosis in lung transplant recipients

BackgroundAirway stenting may be needed to manage anastomotic complications in lung transplant recipients. Conventional stenting strategies may be inadequate due to anatomic variations between the recipient and donor or involvement of both the anastomosis and lobar bronchi. MethodsWe investigated the efficacy of 3D-designed patient-specific silicone Y-stents in managing this scenario. 9 patients with complex airway stenosis underwent custom stent insertion after either failing traditional management strategies or having anatomy not suitable for conventional stents. CT images were uploaded to stent design software to make a virtual stent model. 3D printing technology was then used to make a mold for the final silicone stent which was implanted via rigid bronchoscopy. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was measured pre- and post-stent placement. Results78 % of patients experienced an increase in their FEV1 after stent insertion, (p = 0.001, 0.02 at 30 and 90 days respectively). Unplanned bronchoscopies primarily occurred due to mucous plugging. 2 patients had sufficient airway remodeling allowing for stent removal. ConclusionsPersonalized 3D-designed Y-stents demonstrate promising results for managing complicated airway stenosis, offering improved lung function and potential long-term benefits for lung transplant recipients.

Goal-Directed Use of Prothrombin Complex Concentrates in Liver Transplantation: Is a Plasma-Free Procedure Feasible?

Background: Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusions have been the mainstay of hemostatic intervention for the treatment of bleeding and coagulation abnormalities arising during liver transplantation (LT) for decades. However, numerous clinical studies showed that FFP has many side effects, including the risk of pathogen transmission, transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO), transfusion-related immunomodulation (TRIM), and transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI). These adverse events are particularly challenging in patients undergoing LT, who often suffer from severe portal hypertension, poor renal function and coexisting cardiac disease.The aims of this review are to summarize the pharmacological properties of currently available PCCs, to represent the theoretical benefits and the possible risks related to the use of these drugs in patients undergoing LT, and, finally, to review the current literature on the topic in order to highlight the evidence that currently supports PCC use in LT patients. Methods: The current literature on the topic was reviewed in order to highlight the evidence that currently supports PCC use in LT patients. Results: Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) may offer several advantages when compared to FFP. Indeed, PCCs have been shown to reduce the risk of TACO, which during liver transplantation may deteriorate portal hypertension, increase intraoperative bleeding, and possibly reduce survival rates. One of the major concerns for PCC use is thrombogenicity. However, currently available PCCs are much safer as they contain inactivated forms of the vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors and protein C, protein S, antithrombin and/or heparin. Nowadays, the use of PCCs to correct coagulation abnormalities that occur during LT is an increasingly widespread practice. However, it is not yet clear what level of evidence supports this practice, and what the risks associated with it are. Conclusions: Administration of PCC in LT patients to correct haemostatic abnormalities seems to be well-tolerated, but the relationship between PCC use and thromboembolic events in the postoperative period remains unclear. Adequately powered, methodologically sound trials are urgently required for more definitive conclusions about the efficacy and safety of PCCs in a broad phenotype of LT recipients.

Sirolimus to treat chronic and steroid-resistant allograft rejection-related fibrosis in pediatric liver transplantation.

This study aimed to report our experience with the use of sirolimus in pediatric liver transplant patients with chronic rejection or steroid-resistant rejection with hepatic fibrosis, focusing on their histological evolution. All pediatric liver transplant recipients who received off-label treatment with sirolimus for chronic ductopenic rejection or cortico-resistant rejection between July 2003 and July 2022 were included in the study. All nine patients included in the study showed improvement in liver enzymes and cholestasis parameters as soon as 1-month after postsirolimus introduction. A decrease in fibrosis stage was observed in 7/9 (77.7%) patients at 36 months. All but one patient experienced an improvement in the Rejection Activity Index and ductopenia at 12 months. A single patient had to discontinue sirolimus treatment owing to nephrotic proteinuria. In conclusion, sirolimus may be a safe and effective treatment for chronic and steroid-resistant rejection and may improve allograft rejection-related fibrosis and ductal damage.