Liver Transplant Candidates Research Articles

Clinical and echocardiographic predictors of outcome in liver transplant patients.

Liver transplant (LT) candidates undergo transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) before surgery to assess cardiac function and evaluate the echocardiographic probability of pulmonary hypertension (PHT). The improvement of pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PAPS) after transplant is associated with higher survival rates in patients with mild or moderate PHT. Although studies analyze the outcomes of LT in patients treated for PHT, the prognostic value of PAPS in patients without PHT in the follow-up is unknown. The aim of our study is to evaluate pre- and post-LT cardiac function, right ventricular function, pulmonary artery pressure, and their association with long-term mortality. 102 patients who underwent LT between 2011 and 2018 were compared for echocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters pre- and post-LT. After LT, systolic blood pressure, heart rate (HR), and PASP significantly increased, while tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/PAPS decreased. Moreover, the higher difference in HR and PASP between pre- and post-LT was highlighted in those patients who died during the follow-up period after LT. Among all the parameters tested, in the multi-variable Cox regression for mortality, left ventricular ejection fraction and PASP difference were predictors of mortality. This study highlights the importance of TTE in LT screening as a tool to stratify patients at higher risk of death due to advanced cirrhotic cardiomyopathy and the importance of the change of echocardiographic parameters, in particular right and left ventricular hemodynamics, during the follow-up period. These parameters could be used to guide a more aggressive therapy.

Detection of Coronary Artery Disease With Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography and Stress Testing in Candidates for Liver Transplant

Cardiac complications are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in liver transplant (LT) recipients. Prior guidelines recommended stress testing to exclude coronary artery disease (CAD), though recent guidelines recommend coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). We aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of CAD on CCTA and compare CCTA with stress testing in consecutive adult LT candidates undergoing CAD non-invasive assessment between 2020 to 2023. Patients who underwent a stress test between 01/2020 and 12/2020 formed the stress cohort, and patients who underwent CCTA between 01/2021 and 09/2023 formed the CCTA cohort. There were 141 in the stress test cohort and 269 patients in the CCTA cohort. Stress tests were non-diagnostic or inconclusive in 18 (12.8%) whereas CCTA was non-diagnostic in 6 (2.2%) patients. In patients evaluated with CCTA, mean coronary artery calcium (CAC) score was 332 ± 716 AU, with moderate or greater (>50%) stenosis in 33 (12.3%) patients. New CAD was diagnosed in 158 (58.7%) using CCTA and in 5 (3.5%) patients using stress tests. Clinically actionable CAD (CAC >100) on CCTA was present in 96 (35.7%) patients. The number of CAD risk factors were associated with the presence of CAD on CCTA. In conclusion, there was a high burden of CAD, mainly non-obstructive, in a large cohort of LT candidates undergoing CAD testing over a 4-year period. The current recommended risk-based evaluation of LT candidates using CCTA as a first line test was feasible and effective. Diagnosis of clinically actionable CAD on CCTA provides a vast opportunity for optimizing cardiac care in LT candidates and recipients.

Informatics-driven solutions for optimal care delivery in liver transplantation.

Clinical informatics, which combines health information technology and clinical expertise, aims to improve health care delivery and outcomes. For candidates and recipients of liver transplants, the complexities of their management are vast. Care often involves significant volumes of data from various sources and multiple health care settings and health care systems. Informatics represents an opportunity to support the care of these patients through this process; however, it has been underutilized to date. Preliminary examples of informatics use exist for this patient population, such as clinical decision support to link patients to hepatology providers, utilization of digital health technologies to track responses to medical therapy, and artificial intelligence to characterize organ donor compatibility. Further deployment of these tools can optimize care delivery for patients with cirrhosis and across the transplant cascade. In this review, we explore the utility of various techniques of clinical informatics mainly within the transplant care cascade, barriers to implementation, and highlight opportunities for future investigation and optimized use. Although barriers to widespread adoption remain such as interoperability, data access and availability, and structured implementation strategies, the integration of informatics and clinical decision support/artificial intelligence-based tools into routine care for liver transplantation represents an opportunity for marked enhancement in how we deliver care to these patients.

Expanding Indications for Liver Transplantation in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Improvements in downstaging therapies have expanded the indications for liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients with more advanced disease are now considered candidates due to advancements in radiation therapy, combination therapies, and immunotherapy. Combination stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been shown to be superior to the historic treatment, sorafenib, in patients with macrovascular invasion. These patients are now candidates for LT with stable disease after LRT. Patients with ruptured HCC and prolonged stability have also been shown to have acceptable outcomes. The role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy needs to be further defined and has the potential to further improve tumor control prior to transplant.

Cardiovascular disease assessment and management in liver transplantation.

The prevalence and mortality related to end-stage liver disease (ESLD) continue to rise globally. Liver transplant (LT) recipients continue to be older and have inherently more comorbidities. Among these, cardiac disease is one of the three main causes of morbidity and mortality after LT. Several reasons exist including the high prevalence of associated risk factors, which can also be attributed to the rise in the proportion of patients undergoing LT for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Additionally, as people age, the prevalence of now treatable cardiac conditions, including coronary artery disease (CAD), cardiomyopathies, significant valvular heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, and arrhythmias rises, making the need to treat these conditions critical to optimize outcomes. There is an emerging body of literature regarding CAD screening in patients with ESLD, however, there is a paucity of strong evidence to support the guidance regarding the management of cardiac conditions in the pre-LT and perioperative settings. This has resulted in significant variations in assessment strategies and clinical management of cardiac disease in LT candidates between transplant centres, which impacts LT candidacy based on a transplant centre's risk tolerance and comfort level for caring for patients with concomitant cardiac disease. Performing a comprehensive assessment and understanding the potential approaches to the management of ESLD patients with cardiac conditions may increase the acceptance of patients, who appear too complex, but rather require extra evaluation and may be reasonable candidates for LT. The unique physiology of ESLD can profoundly influence preoperative assessment, perioperative management, and outcomes associated with underlying cardiac pathology, and requires a thoughtful multidisciplinary approach. The strategies proposed in this manuscript attempt to review the latest expert experience and opinions and provide guidance to practicing clinicians who assess and treat patients being considered for LT. These topics also highlight the gaps that exist in the comprehensive care of LT patients and the need for future investigations in this field.

Limited utility of routine bone scintigraphy in the staging of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A cross-sectional study

Introduction and ObjectivesThe most widely used staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the Barcelona Liver Clinic Cancer (BCLC) system, which considers tumor burden, performance status, and liver function. Tumor burden is assessed with cross sectional imaging of the abdomen and chest, controversy surrounds the routine use of bone scintigraphy (BS) for detecting extrahepatic metastases. This study evaluated the role of BS in staging HCC in Mexican patients. Patients and MethodsRetrospective cross-sectional study of all adults with HCC at a Mexican referral center from 2000 to 2018. Staging included abdominal computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging, chest CT, and BS. The main outcome was the impact of BS on staging and/or therapy plans. ResultsAmong 238 patients, 2 with fibrolamellar variant and 44 with incomplete data were excluded. Median age was 66 years, 84 % had cirrhosis, and the predominant etiology was hepatitis C virus (43 %). BCLC stages were distributed as follows: A (14 %), B (7 %), C (68 %), and D (11 %). Extrahepatic disease was present in 18 %; only 8 % patients had a positive BS. Among the positive cases, 4 were true positives, but they did not alter staging or therapy plans. ConclusionsRoutine BS in HCC staging demonstrated low yield, with a notable rate of false positives. Considering the implications of extrahepatic disease, BS may be justified for liver transplant candidates outside conventional criteria. Our study highlights the limited role of BS in early-stage HCC and advocates for a more selective utilization.

Recurrence risk prediction models for hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation (LT) is an effective method for curing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However postoperative tumor recurrence can lead to higher mortality rates. To select suitable candidates for LT, the Milan Criteria (MC) were first proposed based on tumor morphological characteristics. For those patients who meet the MC, the MC can effectively reduce the postoperative tumor recurrence rate and improve the prognosis of patients undergoing LT. It has always been internationally recognized as the gold standard for selecting candidates for LT, marking a milestone in the history of LT for HCC. However, its strict conditions exclude some HCC patients who could benefit from LT. Therefore, comprehension consideration criteria, including serum biomarkers, tumor histology, and other factor, have been continuously proposed in addition to tumor morphology. This article summaries the prediction model for HCC recurrence after LT from five aspects: tumor morphology, serum markers, histopathology, cellular inflammatory factors and downstaging treatment before transplantation. The aim is to assist clinicians in accurately assessing HCC status, selecting appropriate liver transplant candidates, maximize graft and patients' survival, and optimizing the utilization of social health resources.

Cryptococcosis in wait-listed liver transplant candidates: Prevalence, manifestations, and risk factors

BackgroundLiver cirrhosis compromises immunity against cryptococcosis, and liver transplant recipients tend to develop the disease earlier after transplantation, possibly due to unrecognized pretransplant infection. We assessed the prevalence and characteristics of cryptococcosis among liver transplant candidates and whether pre-transplant cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) can detect the disease before transplantation. MethodsWe retrospectively included liver transplant candidates in a tertiary hospital during 2017–2022. Serum CrAg and pulmonary computed tomography were incorporated in routine transplant evaluation. Other investigations were done if indicated. Cryptococcosis was diagnosed by positive culture or CrAg. Risk factors for cryptococcosis were also assessed. ResultsOf the 377 candidates with a median MELD-Na score of 18, 84.4% had hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Cryptococcosis was diagnosed in 10 (2.6%) candidates, by CrAg in 6, culture in 2, or both in 2. Only 3 had fever, and 3 were asymptomatic; 7 had pulmonary cryptococcosis. Of the 10 candidates with cryptococcosis, one underwent transplantation after 143-day antifungals. Of the 87 candidates undergoing liver transplantation, one (1.2%) recipient developed cryptococcosis 14 days post-transplant with negative CrAg three weeks before transplantation. HBsAg-positive chronic HBV infection with HBV DNA loads <2000 IU/mL was significantly associated with cryptococcosis (odds ratio 4.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2–16.5, p = 0.03) after the adjustment of MELD-Na score. ConclusionsThe prevalence of cryptococcosis was 2.6% among our liver transplant candidates and CrAg detected 80% of the cases. Disease presentation was mild and pulmonary disease predominated. HBsAg-positive chronic HBV infection with HBV DNA loads <2000 IU/mL was significantly associated with cryptococcosis.

Reduced Prognostic Value of Regadenoson Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Liver Transplant Candidates in Comparison to Controls

Reduced Prognostic Value of Regadenoson Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Liver Transplant Candidates in Comparison to Controls

Intrinsic or Nonintrinsic End-stage Liver Disease and Its Association With Thromboelastography-based Coagulation States in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Perioperative coagulation management in liver transplantation recipients is challenging. Viscoelastic testing with rotational thromboelastography (TEG) can help quantify hemostatic profiles. The current work aimed to investigate whether the etiology of end-stage liver disease, pretransplant disease severity, or pretransplant thrombotic or bleeding complications are associated with specific TEG patterns. Retrospective cohort study. Single quaternary care hospital. A total of 1,078 adult liver transplant patients. The primary exposure was the etiology of end-stage liver disease classified as either intrinsic or nonintrinsic (eg, biliary obstruction or cardiovascular). Secondary exposures were patients' preoperative Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, Child-Pugh class, presence of major preoperative thrombotic complications, and major bleeding complications. Patients with intrinsic liver disease (84%) showed higher odds of hypocoagulable (odds ratio [OR]: 3.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.94-7.07, p < 0.0001) and mixed TEG patterns (OR: 4.59, 95% CI: 2.07-10.16, p = 0.0002) compared with those with nonintrinsic disease. Increasing MELD scores correlated with higher odds of hypocoagulable (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.08-1.19, p < 0.0001) and mixed TEG patterns (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03-1.14, p = 0.0036). Child-Pugh class C was associated with higher odds of hypocoagulable (OR: 8.55, 95% CI: 3.26-22.42, p < 0.0001) and mixed patterns (OR: 12.48, 95% CI: 3.89-40.03, p < 0.0001). Major preoperative thrombotic complications were not associated with specific TEG patterns, although an interaction with liver disease severity was observed. Liver transplantation candidates with intrinsic liver disease tend to exhibit hypocoagulable TEG patterns, while nonintrinsic disease is associated with hypercoagulability. Increasing end-stage liver disease severity, as evidenced by increasing MELD scores and higher Child-Pugh classification, was also associated with hypocoagulable TEG patterns.

Living Donor Availability Improves Patient Survival in a North American Center: An Intention-to-treat Analysis.

Assess the impact of having a living donor on waitlist outcomes and overall survival through an intention-to-treat analysis. Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) offers an alternative to deceased donation in the face of organ shortage. An as-treated analysis revealed that undergoing LDLT, compared to staying on the waiting list, is associated with improved survival, even at Model for End-stage Liver Disease-sodium (MELD-Na) score of 11. Liver transplant candidates listed at the Ajmera Transplant Centre (2000-2021) were categorized as pLDLT (having a potential living donor) or pDDLT (without a living donor). Employing Cox proportional-hazard regression with time-dependent covariates, we evaluated pLDLT's impact on waitlist dropout and overall survival through a risk-adjusted analysis. Of 4,124 candidates, 984 (24%) had potential living donors. The pLDLT group experienced significantly lower overall waitlist dropouts (5.2%vs. 34.4%, P<0.001) and mortality (3.8%vs. 24.4%, P<0.001) compared to the pDDLT group. Possessing a living donor correlated with a 26% decline in the risk of waitlist dropout (adjusted hazard ratio 0.74, 95%CI 0.55-0.99, P=0.042). The pLDLT group also demonstrated superior survival outcomes at 1- (84.9%vs. 80.1%), 5- (77.6%vs. 61.7%), and 10-year (65.6%vs.52.9%) from listing (log-rank P<0.001) with a 35% reduced risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio 0.65, 95%CI 0.56-0.76, P<0.001). Moreover, the predicted hazard ratios consistently remained below 1 across the MELD-Na range 11-26. Having a potential living donor significantly improves survival in end-stage liver disease patients, even with MELD-Na scores as low as 11. This emphasizes the need to promote awareness and adoption of LDLT in liver transplant programs worldwide.

Liver transplantation consideration and evaluation: a life-saving treatment in acute-on-chronic liver failure

With the rising prevalence of chronic liver disease worldwide, the incidence and prevalence of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) are increasing and attribute to higher morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Many of such patients die without being considered for the lifesaving treatment option of liver transplantation. The underutilization of liver transplantation as a therapeutic option in the setting of ACLF, is due to multiple reasons; with the heterogeneity of ACLF and the lack of universal definition being the key players. Liver transplantation listing and allocation are based on MELD score. As of now, we do not know where MELD score stands in regard to defining ACLF and the prognostication of such patients. This insight is very important for the efficient identification of potential liver transplantation candidates in the setting of ACLF. This review paper investigates the role of liver transplantation in the setting of ACLF. In light of recent evidence, MELD score is not the perfect model in the setting of ACLF either. The safety of liver transplantation, either deceased donor or living donor, among ACLF patients has been debated. The short-term mortality rate of ACLF patients has created a need for a standard liver transplant selection criterion for these patients. Based on published literature, we find that three commonly used ACLF definitions may be used in combination to define the sensitivity, specificity, and futility of ACLF and we propose an algorithm to best identify patients for urgent liver transplantation in the setting of ACLF. Moreover, we discuss the data on the safety of liver transplantation in the setting of ACLF. Future validation of this multifaceted approach could bridge the gap between ACLF patients and appropriately guided medical intervention.

Body Size Remains the Major Source of Sex Disparity Despite Updated Liver Transplant Allocation Policies.

Efforts to address US liver transplant (LT) access inequities continue, yet disparities linked to candidate traits persist. Analyzing national registry data pre- and post-Acuity Circle (AC) policy, our study assessed the impact of low body surface area (BSA) on LT waitlist mortality. The outcomes of LT candidates listed in the pre-AC era (n = 39 227) and post-AC (n = 38 443) were compared for patients with low BSA (22.9% pre-AC and 23.3% post-AC). Fine-Gray competing risk models highlighted that candidates with low BSA had a lower likelihood of LT both pre-AC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-0.95) and post-AC (HR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98), with minimal improvement in waitlist mortality/dropout risk from pre-AC (HR 1.15; 95% CI, 1.09-1.21) to post-AC (HR 1.13; 95% CI, 1.06-1.19). Findings were mostly reaffirmed by Cox regression models incorporating the trajectory of Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores as time-dependent covariates. Regions 3, 5, and 7 showed notable LT waitlist disparities among low BSA patients post-AC policy. Causal mediation analysis revealed that low BSA and the difference between MELD-sodium and MELD 3.0 (MELD_D, as a proxy for the potential impact of the introduction of MELD 3.0) largely explained the sex disparity in AC allocation (percent mediated 90.4). LT waitlist disparities for female candidates persist, largely mediated by small body size. Although MELD 3.0 may reduce some disparities, further body size adjustments for in allocation models are justified.

Improvement in Survival After Transplantation for Critically Ill Patients With Cirrhosis in the United States.

There is considerable debate over the indication of liver transplantation (LT) for critically ill patients with cirrhosis, in part due to their potentially poor post-LT prognosis. We analyzed the epidemiology and outcome of LT for critically ill patients with cirrhosis over 4 time periods of 4 years. We included adult patients who underwent liver transplant alone between 2005 and 2020 using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry database. We defined critically ill patients with cirrhosis as being in the intensive care unit with 1 or more of the following characteristics at the time of LT: (i) grade III/IV hepatic encephalopathy, (ii) mechanical ventilation, (iii) dialysis, and (iv) vasopressors. A total of 85,594 LT recipients were included, 5,827 (6.8%) of whom were classified as being critically ill with cirrhosis at the time of LT. The number and percentage of critically ill LT recipients with cirrhosis increased over the study period: 819 (4.3%) in 2005-2008 vs 2,067 (7.9%) in 2017-2020, P < 0.001. There was a 17% absolute increase in 1-year survival after LT: 72.5% in 2005-2008 vs 89.5% in 2017-2020, P < 0.001. The 1-year post-LT survival gap between critically ill and noncritically ill patients with cirrhosis narrowed over the study period: 16.7 percentage points in 2005-2008 vs 4.6 percentage points in 2017-2020. The year of LT was independently associated with lower 1-year post-LT mortality (hazard ratio 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.91-0.93, P < 0.001). The absolute number and relative percentage of LT recipients who were critically ill increased over time, as did 1-year post-LT survival. Meanwhile, the gap in survival between this group of patients and noncritically ill patients with cirrhosis decreased but persisted. Cautious access to selected LT candidates who are critically ill may be warranted, provided the gap in survival with noncritically ill patients remains as small as possible.

Liver Transplantation Profile Among Teenagers in the United States

PurposeIndications for liver transplantation (LT) vary across age groups. We identified predictors of outcomes for teenage LT waitlisted candidates and recipients in the United States from 2008 to 2022. MethodsThe Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients 2008–2022 provided data (clinical, sociodemographic, indications for LT, outcomes) for all teenagers (13–19 years) waitlisted for LT in the United States. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, including primary listing diagnoses, were evaluated and compared by age group (13–16 vs. 17–19 years) among waitlisted teenage candidates. ResultsThere were 2,813 teenage LT candidates listed between 2008 and 2022. The most common LT indication was acute liver disease (23.5%), followed by biliary atresia or hypoplasia (11.9%), autoimmune hepatitis (11.1%), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (9.7%). In contrast, chronic viral hepatitis, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, and alcohol-related liver disease (the most common indications in adults) did not exceed 1% each; 2.8% had hepatocellular carcinoma. Excluding the two most recent years, 67.2% of candidates received a transplant; mean time to transplant was 217.0 days (standard deviation 371.6). Independent predictors of receiving a transplant were a more recent calendar year, younger age, higher model for end-stage liver disease score, and an acute liver disease diagnosis (all p < .05). Among the LT group, 3-year survival was 90%, with an improving survival trend. Higher post-transplant mortality was associated with earlier years of transplantation, older age, having Medicaid, being retransplanted, and having hepatocellular carcinoma (adjusted hazard ratios >1, all p < .05). DiscussionIndications for LT among US teenagers are different from adults or younger children. There is a trend toward improved post-transplant outcomes.

Donor Atheromatous Disease is a Risk Factor for Hepatic Artery Thrombosis After Liver Transplantation.

The increasing age of liver donors and transplant candidates, together with the growing prevalence of metabolic comorbidities, could impact the risk of vascular complications after liver transplantation. We enrolled a consecutive cohort of adult patients undergoing liver transplantation from 2012 to 2021 who had a blinded pathological assessment of atherosclerosis in the donor and recipient hepatic arteries (HA). Patients receiving partial or reduced grafts, retransplantation, or combined organ transplantation were excluded. The relationship between HA atherosclerosis and HA thrombosis after liver transplantation was evaluated using logistic regression in the whole study cohort and in a propensity score-matched subpopulation. Among 443 eligible patients, 272 had a full pathological evaluation of the donor and recipient HA and were included in the study. HA atheroma was present in 51.5% of donors and in 11.4% of recipients. HA thrombosis occurred in 16 patients (5.9%), being more likely in patients who received a donor with HA atherosclerosis than in those without (10.7%vs. 0.8%; p<0.001). Donor HA atherosclerosis was an independent risk factor of HA thrombosis (OR=17.79; p=0.008), and this finding was consistent in the propensity score-matched analysis according to age, sex, complex arterial anastomosis, and alcoholic liver disease (OR=19.29; p=0.007). Atheromatous disease in the recipient had no influence on the risk of HA thrombosis (OR=1.70; p=0.55). In conclusion, patients receiving donors with HA atherosclerosis are at increased risk for HA thrombosis after liver transplantation. The evaluation of the donor graft vasculature could guide antiplatelet therapy in the postoperative period.

Patient-Reported Outcome Screens for Cognitive Dysfunction and Predicts Admissions in Cirrhosis

IntroductionHepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a frequent complication of cirrhosis, leading to preventable hospitalizations and increased mortality. Despite the availability of validated neuro-psychometric tests to diagnose HE, only 10% of clinicians regularly screen for HE due to lack of time, equipment, and trained personnel. Materials and MethodsWe studied the association between patient-reported cognitive function and the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery (a validated measure of HE) in patients with cirrhosis. A single-center prospective study of adult patients undergoing liver transplantation evaluation was performed from 10/2020 to 12/2021. Cognition was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery and a brief Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) survey. ResultsTwenty-three liver transplantation candidates were enrolled; the mean age was 56.4 (±9.7) years, 39% were female and the most common etiologies of cirrhosis were primary biliary cirrhosis/primary sclerosing cholangitis/overlap syndrome (30%), hepatitis C (22%) and alcohol-associated liver disease (22%). The mean MELD-Na was 14.9 (±6.4). The mean PROMIS Cognitive Function T-score (PROMISCF) was 49.2 (±9.6). The mean T-scores for the List Sort Working Memory test, Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention test, and Pattern Comparison Processing Speed test were 46.4 (±9.9), 37.8 (±6.2), and 50.22 (±16.4), respectively. PROMISCF correlated with the List Sort Working Memory test (r = 0.45, P = .03). The mean hospitalization rate was 1.6 days admitted per month. On adjusted multivariate analysis, PROMISCF predicted total hospitalization days (P < .001), hospital admissions (P = .01), and hospitalization rate (P < .001). ConclusionsA brief survey can screen for HE and predict hospitalizations in patients with cirrhosis.

Sex disparity in liver allocation within Eurotransplant

In Eurotransplant, relatively more females than males die while waiting for liver transplantation, and relatively fewer females undergo transplantation. With adult liver transplantation candidates listed between 2007 and 2019 (n = 21 170), we study whether sex disparity is inherent to the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scoring system, or the indirect result of a small candidate body size limiting access to transplantation. Cox proportional hazard models are used to quantify the direct effect of sex on waitlist mortality, independent of the effect of sex through MELD scores, and the direct effect of sex on the transplantation rate, independent of the effect of sex through MELD and candidate body size. Adjusted waitlist mortality hazard ratios (HRs) for female sex are insignificant (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.88-1.20). We thus lack evidence that MELD systematically underestimates waitlist mortality rates for females. Transplantation rates are 25% lower for females than males in unadjusted analyses (HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.71-0.77), but HRs become insignificant with adjustment for mediators (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93-1.04), most importantly candidate body size. Sex disparity in Eurotransplant thus appears to be largely a consequence of lower transplantation rates for females, which are explained by sex differences in body size.

Alcoholic Etiology, Severity of Liver Disease, and Post-Transplant Adherence Are Correlated with Worse Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) in Liver Transplant Candidates.

Introduction: Psychosocial pre-transplant evaluation in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) could help identify those patients at higher risk of pharmacological non-adherence, organ rejection, and mortality. The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation (SIPAT) is a validated tool for assessing LT candidates' psychosocial well-being. Data on the ability of the SIPAT evaluation to predict post-transplant outcomes are sparse. Material and Methods: clinical and psychosocial data from a sample of 134 candidates for LT were analyzed. Moreover, the association between pre-transplant psychosocial evaluation and post-transplant clinical outcomes, including organ rejection, mortality, and immunosuppressant drug adherence, was calculated. Results: At the pre-transplant evaluation, patients who showed high SIPAT scores (77, 57%) also had more liver disease assessed by model for end-stage liver disease (MELD; F = 5.04; p < 0.05), alcoholic etiology (F = 35.80; p < 0.001), encephalopathy (F = 5.02; p < 0.05), and portal hypertension (F = 7.45; p < 0.01). Of the 51 transplant patients, those who had a high pre-transplant SIPAT score showed lower post-transplant immunosuppressive adherence, linked to more frequent immunological events. Conclusions: Patients with an alcoholic etiology of liver disease and more severe liver dysfunction are likelier to not adhere to medical prescriptions following transplantation. Current data suggests that this specific group of patients could benefit from early psychological pre-habilitation before undergoing liver transplantation.

A Tailored Virtual Program for Alcohol Use Disorder Treatment Among Liver Transplant Candidates and Recipients Is Feasible and Associated With Lower Post-Transplant Relapse.

Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is a leading indication for liver transplant (LT) in the United States. Rates of early liver transplant (ELT) with less than 6 months of sobriety have increased substantially. Patients who receive ELT commonly have alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) and are often too ill to complete an intensive outpatient program (IOP) for alcohol use disorder (AUD) prior to LT. ELT recipients feel alienated from traditional IOPs. We implemented Total Recovery-LT, a tailored virtual outpatient IOP specific for patients under evaluation or waitlisted for LT who were too ill to attend community-based alcohol treatment programs. The 12-week program consisted of weekly group and individual counseling delivered by a master's level Certified Addiction Counselor trained in the basics of LT.Treatment consisted of 12-Step Facilitation, Motivational Interviewing, and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. We report on program design, implementation, feasibility and early outcomes. From March 2021 to September 2022, 42 patients (36% female, 23 in LT evaluation, 19 post-transplant) enrolled across five cohorts with 76% (32/42) completing the program. Alcohol relapse was more common among noncompleters versus those who completed the program (8/10, 80%vs. 7/32, 22%, p = 0.002). History of trauma or post-traumatic stress symptoms were associated with lower likelihood of completion. Patients' desire for continued engagement after completion led to the creation of a monthly alumni group. Our integrated IOP model for patients with high-risk AUD in LT evaluation or post-transplant is well-received by patients and could be considered a model for LT programs.