Liver Resection For Hepatocellular Carcinoma Research Articles

Short- and long-term outcomes following laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma combined with type I/II portal vein tumor thrombus.

Despite the expanding indications for laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), its role in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) remains unclear. The aim of the current study is to compare the short- and long-term outcomes following LLR and open liver resection (OLR) for HCC with PVTT. All HCC patients with PVTT registered for surgery between April 2015 and May 2022 were enrolled. Patients were divided into LLR and OLR groups, and postoperative recovery and oncological outcomes were analyzed. Twenty-eight patients in the LLR group and one hundred seventeen patients in the OLR group were included for comparison. The blood loss was less and the postoperative hospital stay was shorter in LLR group compared to OLR group both before and after propensity score matching. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) time did not significantly differ between the two groups (8.0 months [95% CI 3.1-13.0] vs. 7.5 months [95% CI 6.0-9.1]; P = 0.845). In stratified analysis, both the recurrence pattern and the median RFS time were comparable between the LLR group and the OLR group in type I PVTT (7.23 [95% CI 0.35-14.12] vs. 7.17 months [95% CI 3.49-10.85]; P = 0.794) and type II PVTT (8.96 [95% CI 0-19.56] vs. 7.60 months [95% CI 5.98-9.22], P = 0.651), respectively. The multivariate regression analysis showed that the tumor size ≥ 10cm, AFP > 200ng/ml, and HBV-DNA > 1000 copies/ml were independent risk factors for RFS. LLR for HCC patients with type I/II PVTT could be safely performed with superior short-term recovery and similar long-term survival compared to OLR. Larger tumor size, higher AFP, and elevated HBV-DNA levels contribute to worse RFS.

Nomogram for predicting early cancer-related death due to recurrence after liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B/C: a multicenter study

BackgroundEarly identification of the risk of early cancer-related death (within one year, ECRD) due to recurrence after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B/C is important for surgeons to make clinical decisions. Our study aimed to establish a nomogram to predict the ECRD due to recurrence for HCC patients with BCLC stage B/C.MethodsA total of 672 HCC patients with BCLC stages B/C from four medical centers between January 2012 and December 2018 were included in our study. The patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 404) and a validation cohort (n = 268) at a ratio of 6:4. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression model was used to establish a nomogram model.ResultsIn our LASSO-logistic regression model, three variables were independently associated with the ECRD due to recurrence: the alpha-fetoprotein-tumor burden score (ATS score, Odd Ratio [OR]: 1.12, p = 0.001), BCLC stage (OR: 4.39, p < 0.001) and the aspartate transaminase (AST) to alanine transaminase (ALT) ratio (AAR, OR: 1.49, p = 0.027) and we established the nomogram model based on these three variables. The nomogram model showed superior predictive ability in the training cohort (Area under the curve [AUC]: 0.754, 95%CI: 0.703–0.804) and the validation cohort (AUC: 0.741, 95%CI: 0.660–0.823). Compared with the ATS score, BCLC stage and AAR, the nomogram both had better predictive ability in both the training cohort (ATS score, AUC: 0.699, 95%CI: 0.646–0.752, p = 0.010; BCLC stage, AUC: AUC: 0.684, 95%CI: 0.637–0.732, p < 0.001; AAR, AUC: 0.593, 95%CI: 0.522–0.663, p < 0.001) and the validation cohort (ATS score, AUC: 0.659, 95%CI: 0.577–0.740, p = 0.002; BCLC stage, AUC: 0.688, 95%CI: 0.622–0.753, p = 0.009; AAR, AUC: 0.540, 95%CI: 0.436–0.645, p < 0.001).ConclusionsWe established a nomogram that had excellent predictive power for predicting the ECRD due to recurrence in HCC patients with BCLC stage B/C, which might help surgeons to avoid futile liver resection.

Comparison of 11C-Acetate and 18F-FDG PET/CT for Immune Infiltration and Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment, making it a challenge to noninvasively monitor immune infiltration. Metabolic reprogramming in cancers, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), is closely linked to immune status. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the ability of carbon-11 acetate (11C-acetate) and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT findings in predicting overall survival (OS) and immune infiltration in HCC patients. Totally 32 patients who underwent preoperative 18F-FDG and 11C-acetate PET/CT, followed by liver resection for HCC, were prospectively enrolled at authors' institute between January 2019 and October 2021. Tracer uptake was qualified. Densities of CD3+, CD8+, and granzyme B+ CD8+ immune cells were assessed and the Immunoscore was defined by combining the densities of CD3+ and CD8+ in tumor interior (TI) and invasion margin (IM). Patients with avid HCCs in 11C-acetate PET/CT demonstrated a longer OS. Those with only 11C-acetate-avid HCCs exhibited a longer OS compared to those with only 18F-FDG uptake. In contrast to 18F-FDG uptake, 11C-acetate uptake was positively associated with CD3+, CD8+, and granzyme B+ CD8+ cell infiltration. Patients with a higher Immunoscore exhibited a longer OS and an increased uptake of 11C-acetate rather than 18F-FDG. The sensitivity of 11C-acetate PET/CT in the detection of patients with immune infiltration was superior to that of 18F-FDG PET/CT (88% [21 of 24] vs. 58% [14 of 24]). These data show that preoperative 11C-acetate PET/CT may be a promising approach for the evaluation of immune status and postoperative outcome of HCCs.

Impact of postoperative morbidity on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after laparoscopic liver resection: a multicenter observational study

The long-term impact of postoperative morbidity following laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma is unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients were affected by postoperative morbidity after laparoscopic liver resection. Hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent curative-intent laparoscopic liver resection were included. Risk factors of 30-day morbidity were identified using logistic regression analysis. Early (≤ 2 years) and late (> 2 years) recurrence rates, overall survival, and time to recurrence were compared among patients with and without postoperative morbidity. Independent prognostic factors of overall survival and time to recurrence of these patients were investigated using Cox regression analysis. This study included 420 patients, 147 (35%) of whom experienced postoperative morbidity. Diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis, portal hypertension, Child-Pugh grade B, multiple tumors, poor tumor differentiation and intraoperative blood transfusion were risk factors of postoperative morbidity. Patients with postoperative morbidity had higher early and late recurrence rates than those without postoperative morbidity (38.8% vs. 22.4%, P = 0.001; 50% vs. 25.5%, P = 0.001). Postoperative morbidity was associated with decreased overall survival (median: 54.5 months vs. not reached, P < 0.001) and time to recurrence (median: 36.4 vs. 68.2 months; P < 0.001). Postoperative morbidity resulted in a 43% and 92% higher risk of long-term mortality (HR 1.43; 95% CI 1–2.03; P = 0.048) and recurrence (HR 1.92; 95% CI 1.41–2.62; P < 0.001). For hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection, long-term oncologic outcomes are adversely affected by postoperative morbidity. Therefore, it is of great importance for surgeons to prevent and manage postoperative morbidity.

The Impact of Perioperative Infections on Long-Term Survival After Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cholangiocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis

The Impact of Perioperative Infections on Long-Term Survival After Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cholangiocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis

Evolution of Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Change Point Analysis of Textbook Outcome over Twenty Years.

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to comprehensively analyze the evolution in textbook outcome (TO) achievement after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) over two decades at a single tertiary referral center. Materials and Methods: All consecutive liver resections for HCC at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from 2003 to 2022 were analyzed. The included 1334 patients were divided into four groups by time intervals identified through change point analysis. TO was defined as no intraoperative transfusions, positive margins, major complications, 30-day readmission or mortality, and prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS). Results: Multiple change point analysis identified three change points (2006, 2012, 2017), and patients were divided into four groups. More recent time interval groups were associated with older age (59 vs. 59 vs. 61 vs. 63 years, p < 0.0001) and more comorbidities. Minimally invasive procedures were increasingly performed (open/laparoscopic/robotic 37.0%/63.0%/0%) vs. 43.8%/56.2%/0% vs. 17.1%/82.4%/0.5% vs. 22.9%/75.9%/1.2%, p < 0.0001). TO achievement improved over time (1.9% vs. 18.5% vs. 47.7% vs. 62.5%, p < 0.0001), and LOS was the greatest limiting factor. Conclusions: TO after liver resection improved with advances in minimally invasive techniques and parenchymal sparing procedures, even in older patients with more comorbidities and advanced tumors.

Influence of Preoperative Hepatic Artery Chemoembolization on Long-Term Oncological Outcomes after Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Assessment of Predictors of Recurrence

Цель. Оценить роль предоперационной химиоэмболизации печеночной артерии и выявить предикторы развития рецидива гепатоцеллюлярной карциномы после радикальных резекций. Материалы и методы. С 2011 по 2022 гг. выполнено 80 резекций печени по поводу гепатоцеллюлярной карциномы на фоне цирроза печени А. Чайлд-Пью. У 36 пациентов хирургическому вмешательству предшествовала химиоэмболизация печеночной артерии от одного до 4 циклов с последующей оценкой ответа по m-RECIST и динамики альфа-фетопротеина. У 44 пациентов резекция выполнена без неоадъювантного лечения. У всех пациентов оценивалась степень дифференцировки опухоли. Результаты. Частота пострезекционной печеночной недостаточности и послеоперационных осложнений в двух группах достоверно не различалась (p &gt; 0,05). В обеих группах при низкодифференцированной опухоли рецидив возник в 100 % случаев, умеренно дифференцированной — в 84 %, высоко дифференцированной — в 50 % (p &lt; 0,05). В основной группе рост АФП приводил к рецидиву в 100 % случаев, у пациентов со снижением онкомаркера — в 59 % (p &lt; 0,05). В основной группе при полном ответе по mRECIST рецидива не отмечено, при частичном ответе — рецидив в 45 % случаев, при стабилизации заболевания — 82 %, при прогрессировании — в 100 % (p &lt; 0,05). Медианы безрецидивной и общей выживаемости в группах с предоперационным лечением и без него составили 10 и 15,5 месяцев, 72 и 48 месяцев соответственно. Выводы. Предоперационная химиоэмболизация при гепатоцеллюлярной карциноме безопасна, увеличивает медиану общей выживаемости после резекции. Рост АФП, отсутствие полного или частичного ответа по mRECIST в группе с предоперационным лечением и низкая степень дифференцировки в обеих группах являются предикторами рецидива после радикальных резекций печени.

Chronological evolution in liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: Prognostic trends across three decades in early to advanced stages

BackgroundWhile liver resection remains the best curative option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), it is unclear whether the consistent progress of multidisciplinary approaches in managing HCC over several decades has influenced the outcomes of liver resection. MethodsPatients undergoing liver resection for HCC from 1993 to 2022 in our institution were retrospectively assessed and stratified into three periods according to the year of liver resection, P1 (1993–2000), P2 (2001–2009), and P3 (2010–2022), and tumor status using the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system. ResultsA total of 1257 patients were included (P1:P2:P3 = 385:490:382, BCLC stage 0/A:B:C = 908:214:135). In the entire cohort, long-term surgical outcomes significantly improved across the three periods. In BCLC stage 0/A HCC, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate improved from P1 to P3 (P1: 65.5 %, P2: 71.3 %, P3: 80.4 %), with HRs of 0.655 (95 % CI: 0.536 to 0.800) and 0.595 (95 % CI: 0.455 to 0.778) for P2 vs. P1 and P3 vs. P1, respectively. Conversely, limited advancements were observed in patients with BCLC stage B or C HCC. Multivariate analysis in BCLC stage 0/A patients demonstrated that ICGR15 > 15 %, ALBI grade 2 or 3 (vs. 1), multiple tumors, microvascular invasion, and surgical period (P2 vs.P1) remained independent poor prognostic factors for OS. ConclusionsSubstantial advancements in the long-term outcomes for HCC patients undergoing liver resection, particularly in BCLC stage 0/A, were observed, while minimal improvement was noted for BCLC stage B and C.

HPB SO64 - Outcomes of liver resection for hepatocellular cancer with or without liver functional assessment using Tc 99m Mebrofenate SPECT-CT, portal pressures: A comparative study

Abstract Background Presence of background liver disease increases the post operative morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). These patients need evaluation of background liver function and portal hypertension, in addition to the conventional risk assessment. The current study aims to look at the outcomes of liver resections performed for HCC cases comparing cohorts with conventional risk assessment (CA) and those with functional assessment (FA) of background liver. Method A retrospective study including all liver resections for HCC cases performed in our tertiary care hepatobiliary unit between 2013 and 2022 (10 years) was conducted. A pathway for liver functional assessment using Tc 99m Mebrofenate SPECT-CT, and portal pressures (cut-off values of 2.79/min/m2 and 10mmHg, respectively) was included in the departmental protocol in December 2018. Data on demographics, underlying degree of liver cirrhosis, types of liver resection and post-operative outcomes including post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) were collected and reported using descriptive statistics. Results 200 liver resections, performed for HCC between 2013 and 2022, were divided into a conventional (126 patients) and functional (74 patients) assessment groups. Median age (68 years) was similar. Background liver cirrhosis was present in 27 (21%) vs 19 (26%) cases, and major resections were performed in 47 (37%) and 10 (13%) cases in the CA and FA groups respectively. In the CA group, 90-day mortality was 7% (compared to FA group (1%) (p=0.26). None of the patients in FA group was found to have PHLF whereas 3 patients each had PHLF grade B and C in the conventional group. Conclusion Formal functional assessment of the background liver by evaluating the function of future liver remnant and presence of portal hypertension helps in selection of patients for appropriate surgical treatment options and improve the post-operative outcomes.

Pre-operative evaluation of spontaneous portosystemic shunts as a predictor of post-hepatectomy liver failure in patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

BackgroundPost-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) can significantly compromise outcomes, especially in cirrhotic patients. The identification of accurate and non-invasive pre-operative predictors is of paramount importance to appropriately stratify patients according to their estimated risk and select the best treatment strategy. Materials and methodsConsecutive patients undergoing liver resection for HCC on cirrhosis between 1-2015 and 12–2020 at 10 international Institutions were enrolled and their pre-operative CT scans were evaluated for the presence of spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) to identify predictors of PHLF and develop a nomogram. ResultsThe analysis of the CT scans identified SPSS in 74 patients (17.4 %). PHLF was developed in 27 out of 425 cases (6.4 %), with grades B/C observed in 17 patients (4 %). At the multivariable analysis, the presence of SPSS resulted an independent risk factor for all-grades PHLF (OR 6.83, 95%CI 2.39–19.51, p < 0.001) and clinically significant PHLF development (OR 7.92, 95%CI 2.03–30.85, p = 0.003) alongside a patient's age ≥74 years, a pre-operative platelets count <106x103/μL, a multiple-segments liver resection, and an intraoperative blood loss ≥1200 mL. The 30- and 90-days mortality in patients with and without SPSS resulted 2.7 % vs 0.3 % (p = 0.024) and 5.4 % vs 1.1 % (p = 0.014). The accuracy of SPSS in predicting PHLF development was 0.847 (95%n CI 0.809–0.880). The internally validated nomogram showed excellent performance in predicting grades B/C PHLF (c-statistic = 0.933 (95%CI 0.888–0.979)). ConclusionThe pre-operative presence of SPSS assessed on the pre-operative imaging proved to be a valuable radiological biomarker able to predict PHLF development in patients undergoing liver resection for HCC.

A classification model for resectability in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

Some patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have poor outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to propose a new resectability classification for patients with HCC. We classified patients into three categories: resectable (R), borderline resectable (BR), and unresectable (UR). Patients (n=409) who underwent hepatectomy for HCC were assigned to the non-UR (R and BR classes combined; n=285) and UR-HCC classes (n=68; training cohort). Patient characteristics in the BR-HCC and R-HCC groups were compared. The new criteria were tested in a validation cohort (n=295). Of the 285 patients, 229 and 56 were classified into the R- and BR-HCC classes, respectively, using macrovascular invasion, tumor size, and future liver remnant/modified albumin-bilirubin scores. Patients with BR-HCC demonstrated significantly worse progression-free and overall survival (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001, respectively) than patients with R-HCC in the training cohort. Similar results were observed in the validation cohort. Multivariate analysis of the non-UR-HCC group in the training cohort revealed that the tumor number and BR-HCC were independent predictive factors for poor overall survival. This classification can help select patients with BR-HCC for preoperative treatment before considering surgery.

Impact of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection on postoperative recovery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma resection

BackgroundThe impact of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection on postoperative recovery of patients who underwent liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains uncertain given the lack of sufficient evidence.AimTo investigate the impact of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection on postoperative recovery of patients who underwent liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsPatients who were pathologically diagnosed with HCC and underwent elective partial hepatectomy in Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital between January 2022 and April 2023 were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. The patients were divided into two groups based on their history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Rehabilitation parameters, including postoperative liver function, incidence of complications, and hospitalization expenses, were compared between the two groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce confounding bias.ResultsWe included 172 patients (58 with and 114 without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection) who underwent liver resection for HCC. No significant differences in the rehabilitation parameters were observed between the two groups. After PSM, 58 patients were selected from each group to form the new comparative groups. Similar results were obtained within the population after PSM.ConclusionPrior SARS-CoV-2 infection does not appear to affect postoperative rehabilitation, including liver function, postoperative complications, or hospitalization expenses among patients with HCC after elective partial hepatectomy.

Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: does age matter?

BackgroundEvaluation of the influence of the age of the patients upon the outcomes of liver resection (LR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsHCC patients who underwent LR between 2010 and 2020 were analyzed. They were divided into 3 groups depending on the patient’s age. Group I (patients less than 60 years), Group II (patients between 60 and 69 years), and Group III (patients equal to or more than 70 years).Results364 patients were included. A significantly higher serum bilirubin and alpha feto-protein were noted in Group I and serum creatinine was noted in Group III. The study groups did not show any significant differences regarding HCC site, number, macrovascular invasion, the extent of LR, Pringle maneuver, and perioperative blood transfusions. Longer operation time was found in Groups II and III, while more blood loss was noted in Group (I) Group I patients had longer hospital stays. Higher postoperative morbidities were noted in both Group I and Group (II) Higher incidence of post-hepatectomy liver dysfunction was noted in Group I. More early mortalities were found in Group I, related to liver failure. We did not experience early mortality in Group (III) Late Mortalities occurred in 117 patients (32.1%). HCC recurrence occurred in 165 patients (45.3%). Regarding the overall- and tumor-free survival, we did not experience any significant differences among the 3 groups (Log Rank: p = 0.371 and 0.464 respectively).ConclusionsCurative LR can be safely performed in selected elderly patients with HCC. An advanced patient’s age should not be considered as a contraindication for curative LR.

The role of cholesterol-modified prognostic nutritional index in nutritional status assessment and predicting survival after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

Malnutrition, which is often underestimated in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), has a proven adverse effect on survival rates. The purpose of this study was to verify the effectiveness of the cholesterol-modified prognostic nutritional index (CPNI) in determining the nutritional status and predicting overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with HCC by comparing it with several other nutritional indicators. This retrospective single-center study enrolled 1450 consecutive HCC patients who underwent curative liver resection from January 2015 to November 2019. We evaluated the prognostic significance of several nutritional indicators, including CPNI, the controlling nutritional status (CONUT), the nutritional risk index (NRI), and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), by applying time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Among several objective nutrition evaluations (including CPNI, CONUT, NRI, and PNI), CPNI demonstrated the greatest prognostic predictive power for predicting OS. Meanwhile, CPNI demonstrated marginally higher accuracy in predicting RFS compared to PNI, and significantly outperformed CONUT and NRI. Univariate and multivariate analyses suggested that CPNI was an independent risk factor for the OS and RFS of patients with HCC undergoing curative liver resection. In most subgroups, malnutrition as identified by CPNI demonstrates strong stratification ability in predicting both OS and RFS. CPNI serves as an accurate and stable instrument for evaluating nutritional status and forecasting survival outcomes in HCC patients following liver resection, which has the potential to markedly influence clinical decision-making processes and the management of patient care.

Clinical Nomogram Model for Pre-Operative Prediction of Microvascular Invasion of Hepatocellular Carcinoma before Hepatectomy.

Background and Objectives: Microvascular invasion (MVI) significantly impacts recurrence and survival rates after liver resection in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Pre-operative prediction of MVI is crucial in determining the treatment strategy. This study aims to develop a nomogram model to predict the probability of MVI based on clinical features in HCC patients. Materials and Methods: A total of 489 patients with a pathological diagnosis of HCC were enrolled from our hospital. Those registered from 2012-2015 formed the derivation cohort, and those from 2016-2019 formed the validation cohort for pre-operative prediction of MVI. A nomogram model for prediction was created using a regression model, with risk factors derived from clinical and tumor-related features before surgery. Results: Using the nomogram model to predict the odds ratio of MVI before hepatectomy, the AFP, platelet count, GOT/GPT ratio, albumin-alkaline phosphatase ratio, ALBI score, and GNRI were identified as significant variables for predicting MVI. The Youden index scores for each risk variable were 0.287, 0.276, 0.196, 0.185, 0.115, and 0.112, respectively, for the AFP, platelet count, GOT/GPT ratio, AAR, ALBI, and GNRI. The maximum value of the total nomogram scores was 220. An increase in the number of nomogram points indicated a higher probability of MVI occurrence. The accuracy rates ranged from 55.9% to 64.4%, and precision rates ranged from 54.3% to 68.2%. Overall survival rates were 97.6%, 83.4%, and 73.9% for MVI(-) and 80.0%, 71.8%, and 41.2% for MVI(+) (p < 0.001). The prognostic effects of MVI(+) on tumor-free survival and overall survival were poor in both the derivation and validation cohorts. Conclusions: Our nomogram model, which integrates clinical factors, showed reliable calibration for predicting MVI and provides a useful tool enabling surgeons to estimate the probability of MVI before resection. Consequently, surgical strategies and post-operative care programs can be adapted to improve the prognosis of HCC patients where possible.

Minimally invasive surgery approaches in major liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

Over the past two decades, minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) has progressively become the standard for minor resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In contrast, its implementation in major hepatectomy has been slower due to its higher technical complexity and morbidity. However, studies published in recent years have demonstrated that minimally invasive major hepatectomy (MIMH) is safe and feasible with less blood loss, fewer complications, earlier recovery, decreased hospital stay, and improved cosmetic outcomes compared with open surgery. This review examines the current status of MIMH, focusing on the respective strengths and weaknesses of the laparoscopic and robotic approaches, as well as assessing their cost-effectiveness and possible future directions. The earlier introduction of laparoscopic liver resection has led to its widespread utilization as a safe and accurate alternative to open hepatectomy. Of note is that the robotic approach has also been increasingly utilized, demonstrating better perioperative outcomes and decreased need for conversion to open hepatectomy vs. the laparoscopic approach. Advantages associated with the robotic approach include the three-dimensional large visual field and instrumental flexibility, allowing for improved bleeding control. Even though evidence has been slowly accumulating regarding long-term outcomes, most studies report no notable differences between open, robotic, and laparoscopic resection for HCC. Regarding cost-effectiveness, MIMH has been characterized by higher operating room and anesthesia costs, especially for robotic procedures that require highly expensive equipment. The increase in cost is often offset by the lower morbidity and, thus, shorter hospital stays associated with MIMH. Future developments, such as the implementation of artificial intelligence and augmented reality, may potentially maximize the safety and applicability of MIMH and, in time, lead to improved postoperative and oncological outcomes.

Construction and validation of a preoperative prognostic model integrating the novel aspartate aminotransferase-albumin score for hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing liver resection.

Patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) often possess good liver reserve, which may limit the prognostic effectiveness of existing liver function scores. This study aimed to develop a novel liver function score and a preoperative prognostic model specifically for HCC resection patients. Eight hundred twenty-seven HCC patients undergoing initial liver resection were segregated into training and validation cohorts in a 6:4 ratio. Cox regression analysis was employed to identify significant parameters influencing overall survival. The efficacy of the liver function score and prognostic model was evaluated using metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and albumin emerged as significant prognostic indicators. The AST-albumin (ASAL) score, calculated as exp [AST (IU/L) × 0.005 - albumin (g/dL) × 1.043] × 100, outperformed existing scores such as Child-Turcotte-Pugh, albumin-bilirubin, platelet-albumin, and AST-platelet ratio index in both training and validation cohorts. Additionally, a scoring model that combined the ASAL score with alpha-fetoprotein and the up-to-seven criterion exhibited superior discriminatory capabilities compared to the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor, node, metastasis stage, and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage. The proposed prognostic model that integrates the novel ASAL score offers promising prognostic potential for HCC patients undergoing liver resection.

Influence of portal hypertension on the postoperative outcome after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of matched cohorts and prospective studies

Influence of portal hypertension on the postoperative outcome after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis of matched cohorts and prospective studies

Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Anatomical Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-matched Study.

Laparoscopic anatomical liver resection (LAR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is technically demanding. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes of LAR and open anatomical liver resection (OAR) for HCC. We retrospectively analyzed 460 consecutive patients who underwent anatomical liver resection as the initial treatment for primary HCC between January 2010 and February 2024. Patients were categorized into the LAR and OAR groups, and surgical outcomes between the groups were compared using 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). After PSM, the LAR and OAR groups included 100 patients each. The LAR group exhibited significantly less blood loss (80 vs. 436 ml; p<0.0001), lower transfusion rates (0% vs. 12%; p=0.0002), shorter operative time (345 vs. 398 min; p=0.0009), lower postoperative morbidity rates (6% vs. 34%; p<0.0001), and shorter postoperative hospital stay (8 vs. 15 days; p<0.0001) than the OAR group. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 97.7%, 96.2%, and 89.7%, respectively, in the LAR group and 98.0%, 92.7%, and 88.4%, respectively, in the OAR group (p=0.5874). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 93.2%, 75.7%, and 60.7%, respectively, in the LAR group and 86.0%, 64.5%, and 59.1%, respectively, in the OAR group (p=0.2314). LAR showed improvements in perioperative complications, reduced postoperative hospital stay, and comparable recurrence-free and overall survival rates with those of OAR. Therefore, LAR for HCC is considered safe, feasible, and oncologically acceptable in selected patients.

Robotic caudo-peripheral approach for liver parenchymal transection in anatomical liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver parenchymal transection is a challenging step during hepatic resection, particularly when using robotic platforms that require specific skills to optimize this phase. Pedicle division at the beginning of the liver parenchyma helps to better identify the resection plane and minimizes blood loss. The three-dimensional (3D) high-definition vision and the robotic Maryland allow for clear identification of the hepatic pedicles that could be dissected or divided without the need for a laparoscopic ultrasonic dissector. The caudo-peripheral technique, combined with the Maryland bipolar Kelly clamp crushing technique, is a useful approach to complete parenchymal transection and achieve safe anatomical resections in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with multi-pronged bleeding control. This is essential for expediting the procedure, reducing the number of intermittent clamping times, and minimizing the risk of ischemia-reperfusion injury. In this setting, perfect synchronization between the surgeon operating at the console and the bedside assistant is crucial. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) systems have shown great potential to redefine clinical care management, preoperative planning, and intraoperative decision making for patients with HCC. This paper describes the most relevant details of our technique, its theoretical background, advantages, and limitations. Moreover, minimally invasive surgery offers the opportunity to share surgical experiences and technical progress through multimedia videos. This represents a modern and effective teaching tool to accelerate the learning process and overcome the challenges of the most complex procedures by offering surgeons various solutions to common technical problems.