Resection Of Liver Metastases Research Articles

Prognostic Impact of Surgical Margin Width in Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastasis.

As for resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM), securing an adequate surgical margin is important for achieving a better prognosis. However, it is often difficult to achieve adequate margins for the resection of CRLM. So the current survival impact of sub-centi/millimeter surgical margins in hepatectomy for CRLM should be evaluated. In the current era of multidisciplinary treatment options, this review focused on the prognostic impact of a sub-centi/millimeter surgical margin width in hepatectomy for CRLM. We systematically reviewed retrospective studies that clearly described the surgical margin width for hepatectomy for CRLM. We selected studies conducted since 2000 that involved patients diagnosed as having CRLM. We focused on studies that investigated not only surgical margins, but also microscopic surgical curability such as R0 (microscopically complete resection) or R1 (microscopically incomplete resection), which clearly describe their definitions. Based on our literature review, 1, 2, or 5 mm was considered the minimum surgical margin width for hepatectomy for CRLM. Although a surgical margin width of 1 mm is acceptable for hepatectomy for CRLM, submillimeter margins, which are defined as R1 in many reports, are only acceptable for limited patients such as those who have undergone preoperative chemotherapy. Zero-mm margins are also acceptable in limited patients such as those who show a good response to preoperative chemotherapy. New chemotherapy agents have been reported to reduce the prognostic impact of a narrow surgical margin width. The incidence of margin recurrence, which is a major concern regarding R1 resection of CRLM, is about 20-30% according to the majority of earlier reports. As evaluations of the actual prognostic impact of the surgical margin remain difficult, further study is warranted.

The impact of the advanced lung cancer inflammation index on the outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who receive chemotherapy.

Advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) is reported to be a prognosticator in various cancer patients with chemotherapy. However, the clinical impact of the ALI on treatment strategies in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients remains unclear. A total of 356 patients, who received first-line chemotherapy for mCRC between April 2005 and November 2019 in a single institution, were retrospectively enrolled. The association of pretreatment ALI (calculated as follows: BMI × albumin value/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) status with clinicopathological factors and patient survival outcome was analyzed, using subgroup analysis. The ALI-low cases were significantly associated with female sex, more synchronous metastasis, multiple metastatic sites, less primary tumor resection, less liver resection after chemotherapy, and poor overall survival (OS). A multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis clarified that the ALI-low status was independently associated with poor OS (HR: 1.78, 95% CI 1.27-2.48, P = 0.001), in addition to right side tumor, multiple metastatic sites, and the non-performance of liver resection after chemotherapy. A subgroup analysis revealed that primary tumor resection and the resection of liver metastases after chemotherapy could not improve the prognosis of ALI-low cases in comparison with ALI-high cases, and the type of first-line chemotherapy did not significantly affect the association between the prognosis and the ALI status. ALI comprehensively evaluates the prognostic host status and is a reliable prognosticator for the mCRC patients with chemotherapy. Calculating pretreatment ALI may serve as a cost-effective and easily available tool for constructing treatment strategies.

Plasma metabolomics, lipidomics and cytokinomics profiling predict disease recurrence in metastatic colorectal cancer patients undergoing liver resection.

In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts), treatment strategies integrating liver resection with induction chemotherapy offer better 5-year survival rates than chemotherapy alone. However, liver resection is a complex and costly procedure, and recurrence occurs in almost 2/3rds of pts, suggesting the need to identify those at higher risk. The aim of this work was to evaluate whether the integration of plasma metabolomics and lipidomics combined with the multiplex analysis of a large panel of plasma cytokines can be used to predict the risk of relapse and other patient outcomes after liver surgery, beyond or in combination with clinical morphovolumetric criteria. Peripheral blood metabolomics and lipidomics were performed by 600 MHz NMR spectroscopy on plasma from 30 unresectable mCRC pts treated with bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based regimens within the Obelics trial (NCT01718873) and subdivided into responder (R) and non-R (NR) according to 1-year disease-free survival (DFS): ≥ 1-year (R, n = 12) and < 1-year (NR, n = 18). A large panel of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors was evaluated on the same plasma using Luminex xMAP-based multiplex bead-based immunoassay technology. A multiple biomarkers model was built using a support vector machine (SVM) classifier. Sparse partial least squares discriminant analysis (sPLS-DA) and loading plots obtained by analyzing metabolomics profiles of samples collected at the time of response evaluation when resectability was established showed significantly different levels of metabolites between the two groups. Two metabolites, 3-hydroxybutyrate and histidine, significantly predicted DFS and overall survival. Lipidomics analysis confirmed clear differences between the R and NR pts, indicating a statistically significant increase in lipids (cholesterol, triglycerides and phospholipids) in NR pts, reflecting a nonspecific inflammatory response. Indeed, a significant increase in proinflammatory cytokines was demonstrated in NR pts plasma. Finally, a multiple biomarkers model based on the combination of presurgery plasma levels of 3-hydroxybutyrate, cholesterol, phospholipids, triglycerides and IL-6 was able to correctly classify patients by their DFS with good accuracy. Overall, this exploratory study suggests the potential of these combined biomarker approaches to predict outcomes in mCRC patients who are candidates for liver metastasis resection after induction treatment for defining personalized management and treatment strategies.

Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy after Resection of Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy after Resection of Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Early Onset Colorectal Cancer with Resectable Liver Metastases Is Not Associated with Inferior Survival: A Case Matched Study

Early Onset Colorectal Cancer with Resectable Liver Metastases Is Not Associated with Inferior Survival: A Case Matched Study

Recurrence Risk after Parenchymal R1 Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis: Is it a Local Matter?

Recurrence Risk after Parenchymal R1 Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis: Is it a Local Matter?

The Effect of the Primary Tumor Location on Survival after Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis

The Effect of the Primary Tumor Location on Survival after Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis

A Preliminary Monocentric Experience with Minimally Invasive Hepatic Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis Exploiting the Access of Synchronous Stoma Closure

A Preliminary Monocentric Experience with Minimally Invasive Hepatic Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis Exploiting the Access of Synchronous Stoma Closure

Critical Appraisal of Surgical Margins According to KRAS Status in Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis

Critical Appraisal of Surgical Margins According to KRAS Status in Liver Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis

Characteristics of tumor thrombosis in the inferior mesenteric vein from colorectal cancer: A report of three cases and review of the literature

Intravenous tumor thrombosis is a rare condition in colorectal cancer and shows a locally aggressive biological behavior. We herein report three cases of colorectal cancer with tumor thrombosis in the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) treated by colorectal resection combined with resection of the IMV under laparoscopic surgery. In these three colorectal cancer patients with IMV tumor thrombus, IMV tumor thrombus was detected in all instances on preoperative computed tomography. Preoperative chemotherapy was also performed in one patient with concurrent liver metastasis. All patients underwent laparoscopic locally R0 resection; however, the pathological findings showed a positive margin for IMV resection in all patients. We reviewed 19 previously reported cases along with our 3 present cases and clarified the characteristics of colorectal cancer accompanied by IMV tumor thrombosis. IMV tumor thrombosis may be a risk factor for liver metastasis and R1 resection, and systemic treatment, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), may be quite important. IMV tumor thrombosis may have a tendency to cause hematogenous metastasis. Systemic therapy, including NAC, may be useful, but since this is a rare condition, the accumulation of further cases is needed.

Criteria for Liver Resection for Metastasis from Bile Duct Cancer

Criteria for Liver Resection for Metastasis from Bile Duct Cancer

Successful Combined Treatment of a Patient with Borderline Resectable Liver Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer

Aim: to present the value of interventional radiology techniques in the treatment of a patient with liver metastasis of colorectal cancer.Key points. In 2013, a 60-year-old patient with stage IIIB sigmoid colon cancer, pT3N2M0 underwent resection of the sigmoid colon with the formation of hardware rectosigmoanastomosis, 6 courses of adjuvant chemotherapy were performed. In 2015, a control examination revealed metastatic liver damage. Liver resection could not be performed due to the small future residual volume, and systemic chemotherapy was not effective. The patient underwent 3 cycles of regional chemotherapy. Taking into account the pronounced positive dynamics, in the form of a decrease in tumor size and a decrease in cancer markers, the patient managed to perform an extended right-sided hemihepatectomy. No progression of the tumor process was detected during the follow-up.Conclusion. Modern possibilities of X-ray endovascular methods allow to achieve results in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer metastases in the liver such as a decrease in metastases in size, that make liver resection possible.

Safety and Efficacy of Simultaneous Resection of Gastric Carcinoma and Synchronous Liver Metastasis-A Western Center Experience.

Background and objectives: Gastric cancer (GC) is often diagnosed in the metastatic stage. Palliative systemic therapy is still considered the gold standard, even for patients with resectable oligometastatic disease. The aim of the current study is to assess the potential benefit of up-front gastric and liver resection in patients with synchronous resectable liver-only metastases from GC (LMGC) in a Western population. Materials and Methods: All patients with GC and synchronous LMGC who underwent gastric resection with or without simultaneous resection of LMs between January 1997 and December 2016 were selected from the institutional records. Those with T4b primary tumors or with unresectable or more than three LMs were excluded from the analysis. All patients who underwent emergency surgery for hemorrhagic shock or gastric perforation were also excluded. Results: Out of 28 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria, 16 underwent simultaneous gastric and liver resection (SR group), while 12 underwent palliative gastric resection (GR group). The median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was of 18.81 months, with 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates of 71.4%, 17.9% and 14.3%, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates in SR group (75%, 31.3% and 25%, respectively) were significantly higher than those achieved in GR group (66.7%, 0% and 0%, respectively; p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis of the entire cohort revealed that the only independent prognostic factor associated with better OS was liver resection (HR = 3.954, 95% CI: 1.542-10.139; p = 0.004). Conclusions: In a Western cohort, simultaneous resection of GC and LMGC significantly improved OS compared to patients who underwent palliative gastric resection.

A Comparison between Open and Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis.

The liver is the most common site of colorectal cancer metastasis. Liver surgery is a cornerstone in treatment, with progressive expansion of minimally invasive surgery (MIS). This study aims to compare short- and long-term outcomes of open surgery and MIS for the treatment of colorectal adenocarcinoma liver metastasis during the first three years of increasing caseload and implementation of MIS use in liver surgery. All patients treated between November 2018 and August 2021 at Careggi Teaching Hospital in Florence, Italy, were prospectively entered into a database and retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-one patients were resected (41 open, 10 MIS). Considering that patients with a significantly higher number of lesions underwent open surgery and operative results were similar, postoperative morbidity rate and length of hospital stay were significantly higher in the open group. No differences were found in the pathological specimen. The postoperative mortality rate was 2%. Mean overall survival and disease-free survival were 46 months (95% CI 42-50) and 22 months (95% CI 15.6-29), respectively. The use of minimally invasive techniques in liver surgery is safe and feasible if surgeons have adequate expertise. MIS and parenchymal sparing resections should be preferred whenever technically feasible.

Will Patients With Liver Metastasis From Aggressives Cancers Benefit From Surgical Resection?

We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of resections for liver metastases (LMs) originating from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and esophagus/gastric cancers (EGCs), which we label as major killers (MKs; overall survival (OS) under 10%). We hypothesized that LM resection must provide the patient with almost a year of OS postoperatively that is considered beneficial. From January 2005 to December 2020, 23 patients underwent resection for isolated LM from MKs. These patients underwent surgery after a multidisciplinary discussion about their performance status, disease evolution during prolonged medical treatment, and the existence or absence of extrahepatic metastases. LM originated from an PDAC, EGC, or NSCLC in 10 patients (43%), nine patients (39%), and four patients (18%), respectively. The median delay between primary cancer and LM diagnoses was 12 months, and the median delay between LM diagnosis and liver resection was 10 months. Most patients, who had objectively responded to medical treatment (57%), had a solitary (61%) and unilobar (70%) LM. Severe morbidity and 90-day mortality rates were 13% and 4.3%, respectively. Margin-free resection was achieved in 16 patients (70%). After liver resection, the median OS was 24 months without a statistical difference when considering the primary tumor site; 1, 3-, and 5-year OS were 70%, 23%, and 23%, respectively. Selection based on criteria such as good clinical condition, response to treatment, and long observation period helped identify patients with LM of MKs who seemed to benefit from resection.

Hepatectomy is associated with improved oncologic outcomes in recurrent colorectal liver metastases: A propensity-matched analysis

BackgroundFollowing resection of colorectal liver metastasis, most patients have disease recurrence, most commonly intrahepatic. Although the role of resection in colorectal liver metastasis is well-established, there have been limited investigations assessing the benefit of repeat hepatic resection compared with systemic treatment alone for intrahepatic recurrence. MethodsA retrospective single-institution cohort study of patients with recurrent colorectal liver metastasis following curative-intent hepatectomy was performed from 2003 to 2019. The oncologic outcomes, including post-recurrence overall survival, were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Patients undergoing repeat hepatic resection were propensity-matched with patients receiving systemic treatment alone based on relevant clinicopathologic variables. ResultsThere were 338 patients treated with hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis over the study period. Liver recurrence was observed in 147 (43%) patients at a median time of 10 months from prior resection, with a median post-recurrence overall survival of 29 months. There were 37 patients managed with repeat hepatic resection; 33 (89%) received perioperative chemotherapy. On propensity matching, there were no significant clinicopathologic differences between 37 patients having repeat hepatic resection and 37 patients treated with systemic treatment alone. Repeat hepatic resection was independently associated with improved 5-year post-recurrence overall survival compared with systemic treatment alone (median overall survival 41 vs 35 months, 5-year overall survival 19% vs 3%, P = .048). ConclusionDisease characteristics of patients with intrahepatic recurrence of colorectal liver metastasis, specifically the number of liver lesions and size of the largest lesion, are most predictive of survival and response to systemic therapy. Patients who recur with oligometastatic liver disease experience improved outcomes and derive benefit from curative-intent repeat hepatic resection with integrated perioperative systemic therapy.

Modern trends in minimally invasive versus open hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis: an analysis of ACS-NSQIP.

Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) provides the best opportunity for prolonged survival. Eligibility for metastasectomy has expanded with technical advancements including parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy (PSH). Meanwhile, enthusiasm for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has increased, though this approach may be preferentially utilized for technically straightforward cases. The purpose of this study is to characterize modern trends in open versus MIS approaches to partial hepatectomy and anatomic hepatectomy for CRLM within a nationwide cohort. The American College of Surgeons' National SurgicalQuality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) was used to investigate trends in MIS versus open hepatectomy for CRLM from 2015 to 2019. We examined baseline clinicopathologic and disease-related characteristics and compared trends in treatments over the study period. A total of 7457 patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM were identified (1367 MIS, 6090 open). Patients had similar clinicopathologic features between the two groups. Patients undergoing MIS resection less frequently received neoadjuvant therapy (51.1% vs 64.0%, p < 0.001) or concurrent intraoperative ablation (15.0% vs 21.3%, p < 0.001). Patients with tumors < 2cm (34.9% vs 26.8%, p < 0.001) or only one to two tumors (82.8% vs 65.0%, p < 0.001) more commonly underwent MIS. MIS and open partial hepatectomies both significantly increased over the study period, but open partial hepatectomy increased at a greater rate than MIS (p < 0.001). Rates of anatomic resections have remained the same, with a greater proportionperformed using an open approach (34.9% vs 16.4%, p < 0.001). Rates ofoperations consisting of > 1 concurrent partial hepatectomy are stable, but significantly more likely to be performed open (p < 0.001). Hepatectomy for CRLM has increased from arisein partial hepatectomy, potentially translating to increased use of PSH. Current trends suggest MIS approaches appear to be increasing, but selectively implemented for patients with less technically demanding disease characteristics. Educational efforts should be directed towards increased dissemination of parenchymal-sparing MIS techniques for more complex resections.

Impacts of primary tumor location on outcomes in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis vary according to tumor burden.

The purpose of this study was to verify whether the prognostic value of primary tumor location (PTL) for patients undergoing resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) is affected by tumor burden. Patients who underwent a first curative-intent surgery for CRLM from 2006 to 2017 were enrolled. The imaging tumor burden score (TBS) was calculated as TBS2 = (maximum tumor diameter in cm)2 + (number of lesions)2. Then, the prognostic role of PTL was assessed in different TBS zones. The patient population consisted of 524 left-sided (LS) and 118 right-sided (RS) primary tumors. The distribution of TBS in the patient cohort was: Zone1: TBS <3 [n = 161 (25.1%)], zone 2: TBS ≥3 to <7 [n = 343 (53.4%)], and zone 3: TBS ≥7 [n = 138 (21.5%)]. In the whole cohort, the 5-year overall survival (OS) in the RS group was worse than that in the LS group (35.6% vs. 45.4%). However, after adjustment for known prognostic confounders, the RS group was not independently associated with a poorer OS (HR 1.18, p = 0.247). Among patients with TBS <7, OS in the RS group was significantly shorter than that in the LS group in both univariate and multivariate analyses. The prognostic role of PTL remained significant after propensity score matching or excluding patients who received anti-EGFR agents. Conversely, the association between PTL and OS was no longer evident in patients with TBS ≥7. The current study demonstrates that the prognostic value of PTL varies by TBS, and RS tumors are only associated with shorter survival in patients with low or medium TBS.

Non-colorectal liver metastases: A review of interventional and surgical treatment modalities.

Liver metastases (LM) occur in up to 90% either simultaneously with the diagnosis of the primary tumor or at a later time-point. While resection of colorectal LM and resection or transplantation of neuroendocrine LM is part of a standard therapy with a 5-year patient survival of up to 80%, resection of non-colorectal and non-neuroendocrine LM is still discussed controversially. The reason for it is the significantly lower survival benefit of all different tumor entities depending on the biological aggressiveness of the tumor. Randomized controlled trials are lacking. However, reviews of case series with ≥100 liver resections are available. They show a 5-year patient survival of up to 42% compared to only <5% in patients without treatment. Risk factors for poor survival include the type of primary tumor, a short interval between resection of the primary tumor and liver resection, extrahepatic manifestation of the tumor, number and size of the LM, and extent of liver resection. Overall, it has recently been shown that a good patient selection, the technical advances in surgical therapy and the use of a risk score to predict the prognosis lead to a significantly better outcome so that it is no longer justified not to offer liver resection to patients with non-colorectal, non- endocrine LM. Since modern therapy of LM is multimodal, the optimal therapeutic approach is decided individually by a multidisciplinary team consisting of visceral surgeons, oncologists, interventional radiologists and radiologists as part of a tumor board.

Circulating Tumor DNA as a Marker of Minimal Residual Disease After Radical Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Prognostic tools to estimate the risk of relapse for patients with liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer (LL-mCRC) undergoing resection with curative intent are needed. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a surrogate of postsurgical minimal residual disease is a promising marker in localized CRC. We explored the role of postoperative ctDNA as a marker of minimal residual disease in patients with radically resected LL-mCRC. Seventy-six patients with LL-mCRC were retrospectively included. DNA from tumor tissue was sequenced, and one somatic mutation was then assessed by digital droplet polymerase chain reaction in plasma samples collected after surgery to identify the persistence of ctDNA. Relapse-free survival and postresection overall survival were compared between patients with positive vs negative postoperative ctDNA. ctDNA was found in 39 (51%) of 76 patients with LL-mCRC. At a median follow-up of 77 months, 33 of 39 ctDNA-positive patients and 20 of 37 ctDNA-negative patients experienced disease relapse (P = .008). ctDNA-positive patients reported significantly shorter RFS than ctDNA-negative ones (median RFS 12.7 v 27.4 months hazard ratio, 2.09, P = .008). In the multivariable model including other prognostic covariates, this association was still significant (P = .046) and a trend toward shorter overall survival among ctDNA-positive patients was reported (hazard ratio, 1.65, P = .183). The detection of postsurgical ctDNA is an independent negative prognostic marker and identifies patients at high risk of relapse after liver metastases resection.