Recent years have witnessed an increasing inter est in the relationship between alanine amino transferase (ALT) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [1]. Traditionally, increased ALT concentrations are believed to be a conse quence of liver injury in NAFLD and are, thus, widely used as a surrogate marker of this condi tion [2]. However, studies assessing the specificity and sensitivity of ALT as a marker of NAFLD have been limited and efforts to identify reliable cutoff values for this enzyme, in order to facili tate the identification of subjects with NAFLD, have generated conflicting results [3]. Another issue inherent to the use of ALT as a biomarker of NAFLD is the possible confounding factors that might cause ALT elevation [4]. For example, small amounts of alcohol consumption, as well as hepatotoxic medications, may act as confounding factors in the association between increased ALT concentrations and NAFLD. These caveats not withstanding, ALT can be considered an accept able marker for NAFLD in epidemio logical studies. By contrast, caution should exercised regarding the use of ALT for diagnostic and mon itoring purposes in the clinical care of NAFLD patients [5]. Another problem with the use of ALT as a diagnostic or monitoring biomarker of NAFLD is the existence of two isoforms of this enzyme, termed ALT1 and 2 [6]. Jadhao and colleagues have previously demon strated that murine ALT2 gene expression is induced two fold in fatty livers of obese mice [7]. By contrast, the expression of murine ALT1 was unchanged. This raises a question regarding which ALT form is actually measured in serum in the settings of standard clinical chemistry. It is now widely accepted that the full histo logical spectrum of NAFLD may be found in patients with normal ALT. Francanzani and coworkers have convincingly demonstrated that
Read full abstract