To date there is still no efficient and safe treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after renal transplantation. Recently, Fontaine et al. (1) reported on the treatment of 13 renal transplant (RT) patients with ribavirin monotherapy. They found that ribavirin monotherapy was associated with a significant decrease in serum alanine aminotransferase levels without any effect upon either HCV RNA viremia or quantitative intrahepatic HCV RNA viral load. They also suggested that ribavirin monotherapy improved liver histopathology. We have previously observed similar findings with respect to liver enzyme levels and HCV RNA viremia in HCV-positive RT patients treated by ribavirin monotherapy (2). However, after 12 months of ribavirin therapy, our patients experienced a significant worsening in liver fibrosis; the mean time between the two liver biopsies (LB) was 17 (11–27) months. Conversely, in the study by Fontaine et al. (1), although they found a significant decrease in the mean activity score, there was no significant change in the grade of liver fibrosis (P= 0.1). The absence of a significant change in liver fibrosis grade might have been related to the fact that 5 of their 13 patients had already had cirrhosis before treatment and, consequently, had no potential to deteriorate their liver fibrosis grade further. The time between the two LBs was as long as 5.7 ± 9.3 years. Hence, the actual liver activity and fibrosis scores just before treatment are unknown and, consequently, we might wonder whether the modifications in liver histology observed in their patients were related to ribavirin therapy and/or to the natural history of HCV infection after renal transplantation. We, and others, have recently reported that liver fibrosis might regress in untreated HCV-positive RT patients despite the persistence of a high HCV RNA viral load (3, 4). Finally, in the study of Fontaine et al. (1), there was no control group; thus, the authors compared the yearly liver fibrosis progression rate of patients treated by ribavirin with the data obtained previously from a cohort of 28 RT patients who had undergone two consecutive LBs (5). In the study by Zylbergberg et al. (5), the yearly liver fibrosis progression rate was abnormally high (i.e., 0.26 ± 0.35) compared with the observations of Alric et al. (6) in HCV RNA-positive RT patients (i.e., 0.067 [−0.05–0.18]). In this prospective controlled study, we observed a slow progression of liver fibrosis in patients with early moderate liver disease. More recently, Fehr et al. (7) found no cases of cirrhosis amongst 23 RT patients infected with HCV for more than 15 years. The discrepancy between the results observed by Zylbergberg et al. (5) and the two other studies, which were not quoted in the paper of Fontaine et al. (1), might be related to the use of different immunosuppressive treatments because almost none of their patients were on cyclosporine-A-based immunosuppression. Conversely, in the studies of Alric et al. (6) and Fehr et al. (7), nearly all the patients were receiving cyclosporine A, which is known to inhibit HCV replication in vitro. Hence, to date, there is still no evidence for a beneficial effect of ribavirin monotherapy upon liver histology in RT patients. Further randomized studies in larger cohorts of renal transplant patients, including the analysis of intrahepatic cytokine profiles before and during ribavirin monotherapy, are required to evaluate the impact of ribavirin upon liver histology. Nassim Kamar Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Multiorgan Transplantation CHU Rangueil Department of Virology CHU Purpan Toulouse, France Jacques Izopet Department of Virology CHU Purpan Toulouse, France Laurent Alric Department of Internal Medicine CHU Purpan Toulouse, France Lionel Rostaing Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Multiorgan Transplantation CHU Rangueil Toulouse, France
Read full abstract