Liver Fibrosis Test Research Articles

Comparative Study between Fibro-Test and Egy-Score as Non-Invasive Markers for Assessment of Hepatic Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis C

Backgound: Liver fibrosis (LF) occurs in response to almost all causes of chronic liver injury. Assessing LF is important for both predicting disease progression and monitoring efficacy of therapeutic measures. Most noninvasive tests of liver fibrosis were developed with the aim of discriminating between “insignificant”, (F0-F1) by METAVIR and clinically “significant” fibrosis (≥ F2) by METAVIR or for identifying or excluding established cirrhosis in patients with well compensated chronic liver disease. Both these aims are clinically the most relevant. Aim: We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of FibroTest and Egy-Score as predictors of stage of hepatic fibrosis in a prospectively enrolled cohort of Egyptian patients with chronic hepatitis C. Patients and Methodlogy: Twenty patients, treatment naive chronic hepatitis C patients were enrolled. They were 16 males (80%) and 4 females (20%) mean age of these patients was 53.55 +14.3 (rang 18_73 years). The study was carried out in the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Elhussin hospital, Al-Azhar University during the period between March 2016 and March 2018. Results: Our results showed a highly significant positive correlation between stage of hepatic fibrosis by METAVIR and fibrotest. Our results showed a highly significant positive correlation between stage of hepatic fibrosis by METAVIR and EGY-SCOR. Our scores depend mainly on simple routinely used laboratory parameters (total bilirubin, albumin, platelet count) in addition to age and 2 non routine tests (CA 19-9 and Alpha-2-Macroglobulin). Although this panel needs to be done in validated laboratories, the cost of our score is much cheaper than other well-known and patented tests such as FibroTest and the net results of both methods nearly the same. Conclusion: Egy-Score can be applied easily in clinical practice to exclude severe hepatic fibrosis/cirrhosis in patients with contraindication for liver biopsy or those who are reluctant to do it. Egy-score would need further valida‌tion to be regarded as an alternative to liver biopsy. Recommendations: Physician should be careful when interpreting elevated levels of tu‌mor markers CA 19-9 and CA 125 in patients with chronic liver disease as this could be a benign elevation related to hepatic fibrosis and not necessarily due to underlying malignancies. Elevation of the tumor markers such as CA19.9 have been associated with cholestasis in liver disease patients and this may give false positive results for our scores which give Limitations to our study.

Concordance of non-invasive tests for liver fibrosis in HCV patients proposed for treatment with direct acting antivirals

Concordance of non-invasive tests for liver fibrosis in HCV patients proposed for treatment with direct acting antivirals

European multicentre study validates enhanced liver fibrosis test as biomarker of fibrosis in systemic sclerosis.

To validate enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test and its components-amino-terminal propeptide of procollagen type III (PIIINP), tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) and HA-as biomarkers of fibrosis in SSc in an independent, international, multicentre cohort. Two hundred and fifty-four SSc patients from six Rheumatology Centres were included. Sera were collected and stored according to EUSTAR biobanking recommendations and analysed through automated high throughput diagnostics. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software. Two hundred and forty-seven SSc patients (mean age 55.7 ± 13.9 years, 202 F) were analysed. ELF score, TIMP-1 and PIIINP levels were higher in males (P = 0.0197, P = 0.0107, P = 0.0108 respectively) and in dcSSc (P = 0.001, P = 0.0008, P < 0.0001 respectively). ELF score and the single markers significantly correlated with modified Rodnan skin score (r = 0.37, P < 0.0001), disease activity and severity (P < 0.0001 for all markers, except for HA P = 0.0001) and inversely with forced vital capacity, (FVC) % (TIMP-1, r = -0.21, P = 0.0012; PIIINP, r = -0.26, P = 0.0001), TLC% (ELF score, r = -0.20, P = 0.0036; TIMP-1, r = -0.32, P < 0.0001; PIIINP, r = -0.28, P < 0.0001), diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) % (P < 0.0001 for all markers, except for HA P = 0.0115). Multivariate analysis indicated that age (P < 0.001), modified Rodnan skin score (P < 0.001) and DLCO% (P = 0.005) were independently associated with ELF score. Between the first and this validation studies, the value of the ELF score as independent marker of skin and lung involvement in SSc is confirmed in 457 patients. A longitudinal study is on-going to identify an SSc specific algorithm with predictive value for skin and lung progression.

Association of coffee consumption and liver fibrosis progression in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: A 5-year population-based cohort study

Although coffee consumption has been associated with decreased risk of liver fibrosis progression, cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with HCV infection or fatty liver diseases, its effect on hepatitis B patients remains unclear. We aimed to examine the effect of coffee consumption on liver fibrosis progression and cirrhosis-related complications in patients with chronic HBV infection. Coffee consumption was assessed in 2604 participants who were previously recruited from a population-based GERD survey. The primary endpoints of this study were the impact of coffee consumption on the development of cirrhosis-related complications, including liver cirrhosis, esophageal varices, or hepatocellular carcinoma at the end of 5-year follow-up. The secondary endpoints were the declines of serum predicting indices of liver fibrosis (AST/ALT, APRI, FIB-4, Hui score) or liver function tests (AST, ALT). 328 patients with chronic HBV infection were enrolled into this study. At baseline, coffee consumption was associated with higher education level, more frequent tobacco use and normal blood pressure (p<0.05 for all). Patients with higher coffee consumption had a significant lower serum AST, APRI and FIB-4 index value than non-coffee drinkers [adjusted HR 0.30, 95% CI(0.11-0.82) for AST; 0.30, 95% CI (0.11-0.84) for APRI; 0.30, 95% CI (0.13-0.69) for FIB-4]. However, higher coffee consumption didn't change serum AST levels, APRI, FIB-4 index values or incidences of cirrhosis-related complications at the end of 5-year follow-up. Coffee consumption was not associated with fibrosis progression or HCC risk in chronic hepatitis B patients over the 5-year observation period.

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for quantitation of liver disease: a two-centre cross-sectional observational study

LiverMultiScan is an emerging diagnostic tool using multiparametric MRI to quantify liver disease. In a two-centre prospective validation study, 161 consecutive adult patients who had clinically-indicated liver biopsies underwent contemporaneous non-contrast multiparametric MRI at 3.0 tesla (proton density fat fraction (PDFF), T1 and T2* mapping), transient elastography (TE) and Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) test. Non-invasive liver tests were correlated with gold standard histothological measures. Reproducibility of LiverMultiScan was investigated in 22 healthy volunteers. Iron-corrected T1 (cT1), TE, and ELF demonstrated a positive correlation with hepatic collagen proportionate area (all p < 0·001). TE was superior to ELF and cT1 for predicting fibrosis stage. cT1 maintained good predictive accuracy for diagnosing significant fibrosis in cases with indeterminate ELF, but not for cases with indeterminate TE values. PDFF had high predictive accuracy for individual steatosis grades, with AUROCs ranging from 0.90–0.94. T2* mapping diagnosed iron accumulation with AUROC of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.67–0.92) and negative predictive value of 96%. LiverMultiScan showed excellent test/re-test reliability (coefficients of variation ranging from 1.4% to 2.8% for cT1). Overall failure rates for LiverMultiScan, ELF and TE were 4.3%, 1.9% and 15%, respectively. LiverMultiScan is an emerging point-of-care diagnostic tool that is comparable with the established non-invasive tests for assessment of liver fibrosis, whilst at the same time offering a superior technical success rate and contemporaneous measurement of liver steatosis and iron accumulation.

Serological markers of extracellular matrix remodeling predict transplant-free survival in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis is a progressive liver disease with a remarkably variable course. Biomarkers of disease activity or prognostic models predicting outcome at an individual level are currently not established. To evaluate the prognostic utility of four biomarkers of basement membrane and interstitial extracellular matrix remodeling in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Serum samples were available from 138 large-duct primary sclerosing cholangitis patients (of which 102 [74%] with IBD) recruited 2008-2012 and 52 ulcerative colitis patients (controls). The median follow-up time was 2.2 (range 0-4.3) years. Specific biomarkers of type III and V collagen formation (PRO-C3 and PRO-C5, respectively) and type III and IV collagen degradation (C3M and C4M, respectively) were assessed. The Enhanced Liver Fibrosis test, including procollagen type III N-terminal peptide, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 and hyaluronic acid was assessed for comparison. All markers were elevated in primary sclerosing cholangitis compared to ulcerative colitis patients (P<0.001). PRO-C3 showed the largest difference between the two groups with a threefold increase in primary sclerosing cholangitis compared to ulcerative colitis patients. Patients with high baseline serum levels of all markers, except C3M, had shorter survival compared to patients with low baseline serum levels (P<0.001). Combining PRO-C3 and PRO-C5 the odds ratio for predicting transplant-free survival was 47 compared to the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis test's odds ratio of 11. Extracellular matrix remodeling is elevated in primary sclerosing cholangitis patients compared to ulcerative colitis patients. Furthermore, the interstitial matrix marker PRO-C3 was identified as a potent prognostic marker and an independent predictor of transplant-free survival in primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score: Reference ranges, biological variation in healthy subjects, and analytical considerations

BackgroundThe Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score has been recognized as a non-invasive test for liver fibrosis. However, reference intervals, biological variation and analytical performance have not been studied in detail so far. The aim was to acquire data that are essential for correct interpretation. MethodsA total of 40 apparently healthy volunteers were evaluated for reference ranges of serum concentration of hyaluronic acid, aminoterminal propeptide of type III collagen, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteases-1, and calculated ELF score. A subgroup of 20 subjects was evaluated repeatedly for 7 weeks. For all variables, reference intervals, within-subject and between-subject biological variations, reference change values, and the indexes of individuality were assessed. Analytical performance (intermediate precision) and interlaboratory comparison were also evaluated. ResultsThe reference ranges were 5.1–62.7 μg/L for HA, 3.56–12.6 μg/L for PIIINP, 143.6–265.3 μg/L for TIMP-1, and 7.14–9.55 for the ELF score. The within-subject variations were 32.7, 10.6, 4.2, and 3.2% for HA, PIIINP, TIMP-1, and ELF score, respectively. Similarly, the between-subject variations were 59.0, 13.3, 12.8, and 5.2%. For the ELF score, RCV was 10.1% and II was 0.62. The intermediate precisions were <5%, <6%, and <10% for HA, PIIINP, and TIMP-1, respectively. ConclusionThe reference range of the ELF score overlap with the area defined as moderate fibrosis by the manufacturer. High biological variation of HA was diminished by the natural logarithm in the calculation of the ELF score. The use of the ELF score has suitable analytical and acceptable biological performance characteristics for clinical practice. However, the transfer of results evaluated in healthy persons to the populations with chronic liver diseases deserves caution.

FRI-475 - The easy Liver Fibrosis Test (eLIFT) avoids unnecessary specialized evaluations of liver fibrosis in NAFLD and ALD patients

FRI-475 - The easy Liver Fibrosis Test (eLIFT) avoids unnecessary specialized evaluations of liver fibrosis in NAFLD and ALD patients

SAT-080 - Enhanced liver fibrosis test predicts liver-related outcomes in postmenopausal women with risk factors in the community

SAT-080 - Enhanced liver fibrosis test predicts liver-related outcomes in postmenopausal women with risk factors in the community

Non-invasive assessments for liver fibrosis: The crystal ball we long for.

Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis has been one of the most rapidly advancing fields in hepatology in the last decade. Progressive liver fibrosis results in cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and various liver-related complications in essentially all chronic liver diseases. Assessment of liver fibrosis allows clinicians to determine the prognosis, need of treatment, disease progression, and response to treatment in patients with chronic liver disease. Liver biopsy has been the gold standard in last few decades and most adopted diagnostic tool in clinical trials. Nonetheless, it is impractical to apply the test in a large number of patients or to do it serially. Hence, various non-invasive assessments have been developed and adopted in some international management guidelines. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) with transient elastography is one of the most widely validated non-invasive assessments for liver fibrosis. It is an accurate and reproducible method to predict advanced fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B. Using transient elastography, it is possible to perform repeated liver fibrosis assessments on a large number of asymptomatic patients. The key challenge of his tool is the confounding effect of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level, such that decrease in LSM may only reflect ALT normalization, hence not accurate enough to indicate regression of liver fibrosis. This may be partially handled by combining LSM with a serum-based formula, which is independent of ALT such as the Forns index and enhanced liver fibrosis test. An LSM-based HCC risk score is useful to prioritize patients for HCC surveillance.

Diagnostic accuracy of enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test for significant fibrosis in patients with autoimmune hepatitis

Background: Although, liver biopsy is currently the gold standard tool for monitoring fibrosis progression, it is an invasive method and associate with some minor and major complications. Several non-invasive markers have been developed for assessment of liver fibrosis, but their validity has not been well studied in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). The enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test is an alternative, non-invasive method for monitoring fibrosis progression. In this study, we evaluated performance of ELF test for predicting fibrosis stage in patients with AIH. Methods: Serum samples of 46 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with AIH were analyzed, and calculated for ELF scores. All patients underwent a liver biopsy. Patients with ≥F2 were considered to have a significant fibrosis according to the METAVIR scoring system. Diagnostic accuracy of ELF was evaluated with the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves analysis. Results: The mean ELF scores were significantly higher in patients with significant fibrosis that those with mild fibrosis (10.60±1.39 vs . 8.62±1.05, P Conclusions: The ELF test differentiates significant from non-significant liver fibrosis. Our results suggest that the ELF test can be a promising non-invasive method for monitoring fibrosis progression in AIH.

Accuracy of the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test vs FibroTest, Elastography, and Indirect Markers in Detection of Advanced Fibrosis in Patients With Alcoholic Liver Disease

Alcohol is the leading cause of cirrhosis and liver-related mortality, but we lack serum markers to detect compensated disease. We compared the accuracy of the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis test (ELF), the FibroTest, liver stiffness measurements (made by transient elastography and 2-dimensional shear-wave elastography), and 6 indirect marker tests in detection of advanced liver fibrosis (Kleiner stage ≥F3). We performed a prospective study of 10 liver fibrosis markers (patented and not), all performed on the same day. Patients were recruited from primary centers (municipal alcohol rehabilitation, n= 128; 6% with advanced fibrosis) and secondary health care centers (hospital outpatient clinics, n= 161; 36% with advanced fibrosis) in the Region of Southern Denmark from 2013 through 2016. Biopsy-verified fibrosis stage was used as the reference standard. The primary aim was to validate ELF in detection of advanced fibrosis in patients with alcoholic liver disease recruited from primary and secondary health care centers, using the literature-based cutoff value of 10.5. Secondary aims were to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ELF for significant fibrosis and cirrhosis and to determine whether combinations of fibrosis markers increase diagnostic yield. The ELF identified patients with advanced liver fibrosis with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.89-0.96); findings did not differ significantly between patients from primary vs secondary care (P= .917). ELF more accurately identified patients with advanced liver fibrosis than indirect marker tests, but ELF and FibroTest had comparable diagnostic accuracies (AUROC of FibroTest, 0.90) (P= .209 for comparison with ELF). Results from the ELF and FibroTest did not differ significantly from those of liver stiffness measurement in intention-to-diagnose analyses (AUROC for transient elastography, 0.90), but did differ in the per-protocol analysis (AUROC for transient elastography, 0.97) (P= .521 and .004 for comparison with ELF). Adding a serum marker to transient elastography analysis did not increase accuracy. For patients in primary care, ELF values below 10.5 and FibroTest values below 0.58 had negative predictive values for advanced liver fibrosis of 98% and 94%, respectively. In a prospective, direct comparison of tests, ELF and FibroTest identified advanced liver fibrosis in alcoholic patients from primary and secondary care with high diagnostic accuracy (AUROC values of 0.90 or higher using biopsy as reference). Advanced fibrosis can be ruled out in primary health care patients based on an ELF value below 10.5 or a FibroTest value below 0.58.

Utility and cost evaluation of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Validated diagnostic tools that are accurate, cost effective and acceptable to patients are required for disease stratification and monitoring in NAFLD. To investigate the performance and cost of multiparametric MRI alongside existing biomarkers in the assessment of NAFLD. Adult patients undergoing standard of care liver biopsy for NAFLD were prospectively recruited at two UK liver centres and underwent multiparametric MRI, blood sampling and transient elastography withing 2weeks of liver biopsy. Non-invasive markers were compared to histology as the gold standard. Data were obtained in 50 patients and 6 healthy volunteers. Corrected T1 (cT1) correlated with NAFLD activity score (ρ=0.514, P<.001). cT1, enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test and liver stiffness differentiated patients with simple steatosis and NASH with AUROC (95% CI) of 0.69 (0.50-0.88), 0.87 (0.77-0.79) and 0.82 (0.70-0.94) respectively and healthy volunteers from patients with AUROC (95% CI) of 0.93 (0.86-1.00), 0.81 (0.69-0.92) and 0.89 (0.77-1.00) respectively. For the risk stratification of NAFLD, multiparametric MRI could save £150,218 per 1000 patients compared to biopsy. Multiparametric MRI did not discriminate between individual histological fibrosis stages in this population (P=.068). Multiparametric MRI accurately identified patients with steatosis, stratifies those with NASH or simple steatosis and reliably excludes clinically significant liver disease with superior negative predictive value (83.3%) to liver stiffness (42.9%) and ELF (57.1%). For the risk stratification of NAFLD, multiparametric MRI was cost effective and, combined with transient elastography, had the lowest cost per correct diagnosis.

Combination of Transient Elastography and an Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test to Assess the Degree of Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B.

Background/AimsLiver stiffness (LS) was assessed using transient elastography, and the enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test was performed to accurately assess fibrotic burden. We validated the LS-ELF algorithm and investigated whether the sequential LS-ELF algorithm performs better than concurrent combination of these analyses in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.MethodsBetween 2009 and 2013, 222 CHB patients who underwent liver biopsy (LB), as well as LS measurement and the ELF test, were enrolled.ResultsAdvanced fibrosis (≥F3) and cirrhosis (F4) were identified in 141 (63.6%) and 118 (53.2%) patients, respectively. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curve for LS predictions of ≥F3 (0.887 vs 0.703) and F4 (0.853 vs 0.706) were significantly higher than the ELF test (all p<0.001). Based on the LS-ELF algorithm, 60.4% to 71.6% and 55.7% to 66.3% of patients could have avoided LB to exclude ≥F3 and F4, respectively, whereas 68.0% to 78.7% and 63.5% to 66.1% of patients could have avoided LB to confirm ≥F3 and F4, respectively. When confirmation and exclusion strategies were applied simultaneously, 69.4% to 72.5% and 60.8% to 65.3% of patients could have avoided LB and been diagnosed as ≥F3 and F4, respectively. The proportion of patients who correctly avoided LB for the prediction of ≥F3 (69.4% to 72.5% vs 42.3% to 59.0%) and F4 (60.8% to 65.3% vs 23.9% to 49.5%) based on the sequential LS-ELF algorithm was significantly higher than the concurrent combination (all p<0.05).ConclusionsThe sequential LS-ELF algorithm conferred a greater probability of avoiding LB in CHB patients to diagnose advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, and this test performed significantly better than the concurrent combination.

Enhanced liver fibrosis test as a reliable tool for assessing fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a clinical setting.

Liver fibrosis is the main determinant and predictor of the clinical course of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). To date, a liver biopsy is still considered the gold standard for staging fibrosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the commercial enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test manufacturer's cutoff value (≥9.8) in identifying severe fibrosis for adult patients with histologically confirmed NAFLD. We tested the ELF test in a clinical practice, prospective cohort of 82 consecutive patients who consecutively underwent percutaneous liver biopsy. All stages of liver fibrosis were represented in our cohort, and severe fibrosis was present in 15 of 82 patients (18.3%). The stage of fibrosis was significantly associated with ELF score (Spearman's rho = 0.483, p<0.001). The commercial ELF test manufacturer's cutoff identified severe fibrosis with good sensitivity (86.7%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.69-1.04) and high specificity (92.5%; 95% CI, 0.86-0.99), with a positive predictive value of 72% and negative predictive value of 97%. Our data could support the use of the ELF test in clinical practice.

The non-invasive serum biomarker soluble Axl accurately detects advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis

Soluble Axl (sAxl) was recently shown to be strongly released into the blood during liver fibrogenesis and hepatocellular carcinoma suggesting sAxl as a biomarker of liver diseases. In this study we are the first to evaluate sAxl in human serum in comparison to Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) test and transient elastography (TE; Fibroscan) for its value to detect significant (F≥2), advanced fibrosis (F≥3), and cirrhosis (F4) in different liver disease etiologies and healthy controls. To properly determine the diagnostic accuracy of sAxl, a test cohort as well as a validation cohort was employed using liver biopsy as a reference method. Most notably, sAxl was confirmed to be an accurate biomarker of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Its accuracy was increased, if total serum albumin was added to build a sAxl/albumin ratio. Thereby an AUC of 0.763, 0.776, 0.826, and 0.832 was achieved corresponding to histological fibrosis stages F≥2, F≥3, F4 with liver biopsy as a reference method, and cirrhosis according to imaging techniques, respectively. With a cut-off of 1.29, a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 78.5%, 80.1%, 44%, 94.9% for the detection of cirrhosis was achieved. In comparison, ELF test and TE showed an AUC of 0.910, and 0.934, respectively, for the detection of cirrhosis. However, performance of TE was not possible in 14.4% of patients and both, ELF™ test and TE bear the disadvantage of high costs. In conclusion, the sAxl/albumin ratio is suggested as an accurate biomarker of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Due to its easy applicability and low costs it is suitable as screening parameter for significant to advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis, especially if TE is not available or not applicable.

Evaluation of eLIFT for Non-invasive Assessment of Liver fibrosis and Cirrhosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

Recently, the easy Liver Fibrosis Test (eLIFT), a sum of points attributed to age, gender, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, aspartate transaminase, platelets, and prothrombin time, was developed for diagnosing advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis in chronic liver disease. We aimed to evaluate the performance of eLIFT to predict liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Histologic and laboratory data of 747 CHB patients were analyzed. The performance of eLIFT for diagnosing liver fibrosis and cirrhosis was compared with that of aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis index based on the 4 factors (FIB-4). To predict advanced fibrosis, the AUROC of eLIFT was comparable with that of APRI (0.66 vs 0.71, p = 0.095) and FIB-4 (0.66 vs 0.67, p = 0.612). To predict severe fibrosis, the AUROC of eLIFT was lower than that of APRI (0.65 vs 0.83, p < 0.001) and FIB-4 (0.65 vs 0.82, p < 0.001). To predict cirrhosis, the AUROC of eLIFT was also lower than that of APRI (0.64 vs 0.85, p = 0.001) and FIB-4 (0.64 vs 0.76, p = 0.033). The eLIFT is not a good non-invasive test for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in CHB patients.

Comparison of enhanced liver fibrosis test with procollagen-3N-terminal peptide (P3NP) as a marker for liver fibrosis.

Comparison of enhanced liver fibrosis test with procollagen-3N-terminal peptide (P3NP) as a marker for liver fibrosis.

Prognostic durability of liver fibrosis tests and improvement in predictive performance for mortality by combining tests.

There is currently no recommended time interval between noninvasive fibrosis measurements for monitoring chronic liver diseases. We determined how long a single liver fibrosis evaluation may accurately predict mortality, and assessed whether combining tests improves prognostic performance. We included 1559 patients with chronic liver disease and available baseline liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by Fibroscan, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI), FIB-4, Hepascore, and FibroMeterV2G . Median follow-up was 2.8years during which 262 (16.8%) patients died, with 115 liver-related deaths. All fibrosis tests were able to predict mortality, although APRI (and FIB-4 for liver-related mortality) showed lower overall discriminative ability than the other tests (differences in Harrell's C-index: P<0.050). According to time-dependent AUROCs, the time period with optimal predictive performance was 2-3years in patients with no/mild fibrosis, 1year in patients with significant fibrosis, and <6months in cirrhotic patients even in those with a model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score <15. Patients were then randomly split in training/testing sets. In the training set, blood tests and LSM were independent predictors of all-cause mortality. The best-fit multivariate model included age, sex, LSM, and FibroMeterV2G with C-index=0.834 (95% confidence interval, 0.803-0.862). The prognostic model for liver-related mortality included the same covariates with C-index=0.868 (0.831-0.902). In the testing set, the multivariate models had higher prognostic accuracy than FibroMeterV2G or LSM alone for all-cause mortality and FibroMeterV2G alone for liver-related mortality. The prognostic durability of a single baseline fibrosis evaluation depends on the liver fibrosis level. Combining LSM with a blood fibrosis test improves mortality risk assessment.

Accuracy of M2BPGi, compared with Fibro Scan\xae, in analysis of liver fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C

BackgroundMac-2 Binding Protein Glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) is a novel serological glyco-biomarker for staging liver fibrosis. Here, we aimed to evaluate the efficiency of serum M2BPGi in identifying liver fibrosis stages in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis C infection.MethodsSerum M2BPGi levels were evaluated in 680 patients with chronic hepatitis C and 164 healthy controls who underwent the Fibro Scan® test of liver fibrosis. The diagnostic accuracy of serum M2BPGi values was compared to that of other fibrosis markers, including Fibro Scan®, the aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI), the fibrosis index based on four factors (FIB4), and the gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase to platelet ratio (GPR).ResultsAmong the chronic hepatitis C patients, the median serum M2BPGi level increased with increasing fibrosis score as follows: 0.88 (≤F2), 1.70 (F2/F3), and 5.68 (cirrhosis). M2BPGi concentrations could also distinguish between healthy controls (0.38 ± 0.24) and hepatitis C patients (1.57 ± 2.28). After adjusting for potential confounders, M2BPGi was the most significant factor associated with the liver stiffness measurement (effect size = 0.275, P < 0.001). The optimum cutoff values of serum M2BPGi for patients with F2 and F4 were 0.945 and 1.355, respectively. The area under the curve of serum M2BPGi for prediction of significant fibrosis (F ≥ 4) using was comparable to that of APRI (0.892 vs. 0.873), while it was superior to that of other alternative markers, including FIB4 (0.818) and GPR (0.851). Compared with other non-invasive markers, M2BPGi had the greatest specificity for diagnosing cirrhosis and cirrhosis in hepatitis C patients.ConclusionsOur results suggest that the level of serum M2BPGi would be a simple and reliable diagnostic tool for identifying liver fibrosis stage in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis.