has evolved, not merely to build and run the link canals, but to create a great electric power grid, to organize industries, to build a new capital city in Pakistan. On the Indian side, a handsome new capital city has already been undertaken named Chandrigar, designed by the famous architect and planner, Le Courboisier; to visit it is to see again the vistas that were Washington in 1810. Indeed, there is much in newly inde pendent India which evokes thoughts of how our United States was or could have been ten to twenty years after our Constitution was established. Lucidly for us, the Canadian boundary did not bisect many rivers} the Great Lakes lie on a crest and in water terms are an easy natural boundary. Yet we have problems analogous to the Indus, and the large scale ones are the Columbia-Kootenay basin and the Chicago diversion of Lake Michigan into the Illinois-Mississippi. From these analogies, one may understand and sympathize with the political leaders, the planners, the bankers who are trying to work out a peaceful solution of the re-adjustment of the waters of the five rivers of the Punjab, comprised between the Indus on one extreme and the Sutlej on the other, all emerging from the tremendous mountains to the north, and bounded on the west by low mountains. On the east there is no natural boundary; the Great Plain of northern India extends flat as a table a thousand miles to Calcutta at the head of the Bay of Bengal. In that plain it is pure luck that the Indus-Sutlej group flows to the Arabian Sea and Karachi, and that the Jumna-Ganges group flows to the Bay of Bengal and Calcutta. It is all capable of management and re-arrangement on the largest scale, and every government of India for hundreds of years has been a planner and builder of great canals and waterworks in that plain. The Indus problem is an old affair in a new and exasperating dress.