Lineage Plasticity Research Articles

CSIG-24. BRAIN MICROENVIRONMENT-DEPENDENT NEURODEVELOPMENTAL LINEAGE PLASTICITY PROMOTES ADAPTATION TO ONCOGENE INHIBITION IN MALIGNANT GLIOMAS

Abstract Phenotypic plasticity drives non-genetic tumor adaptation in response to various microenvironmental and therapeutic pressures, consequently promoting tumor heterogeneity and progression. In malignant gliomas, the intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms underlying phenotypic lineage plasticity and its contribution to drug resistance remain unclear. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is frequently altered in glioma and serves as a critical regulator of normal radial glia (RG) cells – multipotent progenitors that give rise to cortical neurons and glia in the developing brain. Here, through interrogation of a large panel of diverse glioblastoma (GBM) patient-derived gliomaspheres and orthotopic xenografts, we find that enrichment of RG-like cells is significantly correlated with responses to pharmacological ablation of EGFR, highlighting EGFR as a crucial lineage survival factor for a population of malignant RG-like cells in GBM. Single-cell RNA sequencing and quantitative proteomics reveal that adaptation to EGFR inhibition is linked to a temporal contraction in RG-like cells and concomitant increase in lineage-restricted neuronal and oligodendrocyte progenitor (NPC/OPC)-like states exclusively in the orthotopic brain environment. This lineage transition is coupled to heightened RAS signaling gene expression programs and sustained activation of MAPK signaling, despite robust and durable inhibition of EGFR activation. Furthermore, constitutively active MEK – but not AKT – is sufficient to rescue tumor proliferation under EGFRi, suggesting that the brain microenvironment modulates RAS-MAPK oncogenic signaling to drive lineage transitions following EGFR blockade. Collectively, these results highlight a critical link between oncogenic signaling and neurodevelopmental lineage plasticity in malignant gliomas, presenting a compelling therapeutic opportunity to block tumor cell state transitions for more durable tumor responses in the native glioma tumor microenvironment.

Epigenetic regulation of neuroendocrine prostate cancer

Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (PCa), an aggressive subtype of PCa, can arise de novo or from pre-existing castration-resistant PCa, especially after treatment with new-generation androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs); thus, it is a major cause of resistance to ARSIs. Lineage plasticity drives the transformation of adenocarcinoma cells from the androgen receptor-driven luminal cell program to an alternative neuroendocrine transdifferentiation phenotype, which has been recognized as a key mechanism in neuroendocrine PCa development. Although genetic alterations can promote lineage plasticity, this process is primarily orchestrated through epigenetic regulation, including DNA methylation, chromatin modifications, and long noncoding RNA. Notably, epigenetic regulators are amenable therapeutic targets, offering the potential not only to address lineage plasticity but, more crucially, also to overcome resistance to ARSIs in PCa. In this review, we aim to elucidate the pivotal epigenetic factors driving the plasticity of the PCa lineage, providing a foundation for the development of treatment strategies to effectively combat resistance to ARSIs driven by lineage plasticity.

FoxA1/2-dependent epigenomic reprogramming drives lineage switching in lung adenocarcinoma.

The ability of cancer cells to undergo identity changes (i.e., lineage plasticity) plays a key role in tumor progression and response to therapy. Loss of the pulmonary lineage specifier NKX2-1 in KRAS-driven lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) enhances tumor progression and causes a FoxA1/2-dependent pulmonary-to-gastric lineage switch. However, the mechanisms by which FoxA1/2 activate a latent gastric identity in the lung remain largely unknown. Here, we show that FoxA1/2 reprogram the epigenetic landscape of gastric-specific genes after NKX2-1 loss in mouse models by facilitating ten-eleven translocation (TET)2/3 recruitment, DNA demethylation, histone 3 lysine 27 acetylation (H3K27ac) deposition, and three-dimensional (3D) chromatin interactions. FoxA1/2-mediated DNA methylation changes are highly conserved in human endodermal development and in progression of human lung and pancreatic neoplasia. Furthermore, oncogenic signaling is required for specific elements of FoxA1/2-dependent epigenetic reprogramming. This work demonstrates the role of FoxA1/2 in rewiring the DNA methylation and 3D chromatin landscape of NKX2-1-negative LUAD to drive cancer cell lineage switching.

Role of non-coding RNA in lineage plasticity of prostate cancer.

The treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) has made great progress in recent years, but treatment resistance always develops and can even lead to fatal disease. Exploring the mechanism of drug resistance is of great significance for improving treatment outcomes and developing biomarkers with predictive value. It is increasingly recognized that mechanism of drug resistance in advanced PCa is related to lineage plasticity and tissue differentiation. Specifically, one of the mechanisms by which castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cells acquire drug resistance and transform into neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) cells is lineage plasticity. NEPC is a subtype of PCa that is highly aggressive and lethal, with a median survival of only 7 months. With the development of high-throughput RNA sequencing technology, more and more non-coding RNAs have been identified, which play important roles in different diseases through different mechanisms. Several ncRNAs have shown great potential in PCa lineage plasticity and as biomarkers. In the review, the role of ncRNA in PCa lineage plasticity and its use as biomarkers were reviewed.

ASCL1 Drives the Development of Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer.

Therapeutic resistance to androgen receptor (AR)-targeting agents remains a significant clinical problem during the treatment of prostate cancer, with the incidence rate of resistant disease increasing as more men are treated with next-generation AR-targeted therapies. Lineage plasticity and progression to neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) are mechanisms by which prostate tumors lose dependence on androgen signaling and escape treatment. Although many known genetic alterations can predispose tumors to acquiring the NEPC phenotype, it remains unclear what, if any, drivers are essential to this progression. In this issue of Cancer Research, Rodarte and colleagues identified ASCL1 as one such essential regulator. Through the use of genetically engineered mouse models, the authors demonstrated that whereas ASCL1 was dispensable for tumor formation and growth, ASCL1 loss nearly completely abrogated the development of NEPC and instead redirected lineage trajectories toward a basal-like phenotype. This study provides an important new model for the study of NEPC, reveals the ability of ASCL1+ NEPC cells to also assume a NEUROD1+ state, and demonstrates the changes to tumor cell phenotypes following ASCL1 loss. See related article by Rodarte et al., p. 3522.

Integrated single-cell transcriptomic analyses identify a novel lineage plasticity-related cancer cell type involved in prostate cancer progression

Cancer cell plasticity is the ability of neoplastic cells to alter their identity and acquire new biological properties under microenvironmental pressures. In prostate cancer (PCa), lineage plasticity often results in therapy resistance and trans-differentiation to neuroendocrine (NE) lineage. However, identifying the cancer cells harboring lineage plasticity-related status remains challenging. Based on 13 multi-center human PCa bulk transcriptomic cohorts (samples=3314) and 9 bulk transcriptomic datasets derived from PCa experimental models, we established an integrated lineage plasticity-related gene signature, termed LPSig. Leveraging this gene signature, AUCell enrichment analysis was applied to identify the cell population with high lineage plasticity from a comprehensive single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) meta-atlas assembled by us, which consisted of 10 public human PCa scRNA-seq datasets (samples=93, cells=222,529). Moreover, additional scRNA-seq dataset of human PCa, multiplex immunohistochemistry staining for human PCa tissues, invitro and invivo functional experiments, as well as qPCR and Western blot analyses were employed to validate our findings. We found that LPSig could finely capture the dynamics of tumor lineage plasticity throughout the progression of PCa, accurately estimating the status of lineage plasticity. Based on LPSig, we identified a previously undefined minority population of lineage plasticity-related PCa cells (LPCs) from the human PCa scRNA-seq meta-atlas assembled by this study. Furthermore, in-depth dissection revealed pivotal roles of LPCs in trans-differentiation, tumor recurrence, and poor patient survival during PCa progression. Furthermore, we identified HMMR as a representative cell surface marker for LPCs, which was validated using additional scRNA-seq datasets and multiplexed immunohistochemistry. Moreover, HMMR was transcriptionally inhibited by androgen receptor (AR), and was required for the aggressive adenocarcinoma features and NE phenotype. Our study uncovers a novel population of lineage plasticity-related cells with low AR activity, stemness-like traits, and elevated HMMR expression, that may facilitate poor prognosis in PCa. This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFA0807000), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82160584), Advanced Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Technology Innovation Team of Kunming Medical University (CXTD202216), and Reserve Talents of Young and Middle-aged Academic Leaders in Yunnan Province (202105AC160013).

Deciphering the Tumor Microenvironment in Prostate Cancer: A Focus on the Stromal Component.

Prostate cancer progression is significantly affected by its tumor microenvironment, in which mesenchymal cells play a crucial role. Stromal cells are modified by cancer mutations, response to androgens, and lineage plasticity, and in turn, engage with epithelial tumor cells via a complex array of signaling pathways and ligand-receptor interactions, ultimately affecting tumor growth, immune interaction, and response to therapy. The metabolic rewiring and interplay in the microenvironment play an additional role in affecting the growth and progression of prostate cancer. Finally, therapeutic strategies and novel clinical trials with agents that target the stromal microenvironment or disrupt the interaction between cellular compartments are described. This review underscores cancer-associated fibroblasts as essential contributors to prostate cancer biology, emphasizing their potential as prognostic indicators and therapeutic targets.

ASCL1 regulates and cooperates with FOXA2 to drive terminal neuroendocrine phenotype in prostate cancer.

Lineage plasticity mediates resistance to androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) and progression from adenocarcinoma to neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC), a highly aggressive and poorly understood subtype. ASCL1 has emerged as a central regulator of the lineage plasticity driving neuroendocrine differentiation. Here, we showed that ASCL1 was reprogrammed in ARPI-induced transition to the terminal NEPC and identified that the ASCL1 binding pattern tailored the expression of lineage-determinant transcription factor combinations that underlying discrete terminal NEPC identity. Notably, we identified FOXA2 as a major co-factor of ASCL1 in terminal NEPC, which is highly expressed in ASCL1-driven NEPC. Mechanistically, FOXA2 and ASCL1 interacted and worked in concert to orchestrate terminal neuronal differentiation. We identified that Prospero-Related Homeobox 1 was a target of ASCL1 and FOXA2. Targeting prospero-related homeobox 1 abrogated neuroendocrine characteristics and led to a decrease in cell proliferation in vitro and tumor growth in vivo. Our findings provide insights into the molecular conduit underlying the interplay between different lineage-determinant transcription factors to support the neuroendocrine identity and nominate prospero-related homeobox 1 as a potential target in ASCL1 high NEPC.

The neuroendocrine transition in prostate cancer is dynamic and dependent on ASCL1.

Lineage plasticity is a hallmark of cancer progression that impacts therapy outcomes, yet the mechanisms mediating this process remain unclear. Here, we introduce a versatile in vivo platform to interrogate neuroendocrine lineage transformation throughout prostate cancer progression. Transplanted mouse prostate organoids with human-relevant driver mutations (Rb1-/-; Trp53-/-; cMyc+ or Pten-/-; Trp53-/-; cMyc+) develop adenocarcinomas, but only those with Rb1 deletion advance to aggressive, ASCL1+ neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) resistant to androgen receptor signaling inhibitors. Notably, this transition requires an in vivo microenvironment not replicated by conventional organoid culture. Using multiplexed immunofluorescence and spatial transcriptomics, we reveal that ASCL1+ cells arise from KRT8+ luminal cells, progressing into transcriptionally heterogeneous ASCL1+;KRT8- NEPC. Ascl1 loss in established NEPC causes transient regression followed by recurrence, but its deletion before transplantation abrogates lineage plasticity, resulting in castration-sensitive adenocarcinomas. This dynamic model highlights the importance of therapy timing and offers a platform to identify additional lineage plasticity drivers.

YY1 knockout in pro-B cells impairs lineage commitment, enabling unusual hematopoietic lineage plasticity.

During B-cell development, cells progress through multiple developmental stages, with the pro-B-cell stage defining commitment to the B-cell lineage. YY1 is a ubiquitous transcription factor that is capable of both activation and repression functions. We found here that knockout of YY1 at the pro-B-cell stage eliminates B lineage commitment. YY1 knockout pro-B cells can generate T lineage cells in vitro using the OP9-DL4 feeder system and in vivo after injection into sublethally irradiated Rag1-/- mice. These T lineage-like cells lose their B lineage transcript profile and gain a T-cell lineage profile. Single-cell RNA-seq experiments showed that as YY1 knockout pro-B cells transition into T lineage cells in vitro, various cell clusters adopt transcript profiles representing a multiplicity of hematopoietic lineages, indicating unusual lineage plasticity. In addition, YY1 KO pro-B cells in vivo can give rise to other hematopoietic lineages in vivo. Evaluation of RNA-seq, scRNA-seq, ChIP-seq, and scATAC-seq data indicates that YY1 controls numerous chromatin-modifying proteins leading to increased accessibility of alternative lineage genes in YY1 knockout pro-B cells. Given the ubiquitous nature of YY1 and its dual activation and repression functions, YY1 may regulate commitment in multiple cell lineages.

Neuroendocrine transdifferentiation in human cancer: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets.

Neuroendocrine transdifferentiation (NEtD), also commonly referred to as lineage plasticity, emerges as an acquired resistance mechanism to molecular targeted therapies in multiple cancer types, predominately occurs in metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with androgen receptor targeting therapies. NEtD tumors are the lethal cancer histologic subtype with unfavorable prognosis and limited treatment. A comprehensive understanding of molecular mechanism underlying targeted-induced plasticity could greatly facilitate the development of novel therapies. In the past few years, increasingly elegant studies indicated that NEtD tumors share key the convergent genomic and phenotypic characteristics irrespective of their site of origin, but also embrace distinct change and function of molecular mechanisms. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of molecular mechanism in regulating the NEtD, including genetic alterations, DNA methylation, histone modifications, dysregulated noncoding RNA, lineage-specific transcription factors regulation, and other proteomic alterations. We also provide the current management of targeted therapies in clinical and preclinical practice.

Integrated multi-omics assessment of lineage plasticity in a prostate cancer patient with brain and dural metastases

Metastases to the brain are rare in prostate cancer. Here, we describe a patient with two treatment-emergent metastatic lesions, one to the brain with neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) histology and one to the dural membrane of adenocarcinoma histology. We performed genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic characterization of these lesions and the primary tumor to investigate molecular features promoting these metastases. The two metastatic lesions had high genomic similarity, including TP53 mutation and PTEN deletion, with the most striking difference being the additional loss of RB1 in the NEPC lesion. Interestingly, the dural lesion expressed both androgen receptor and neuroendocrine markers, suggesting amphicrine carcinoma (AMPC). When analyzing pioneer transcription factors, the AMPC lesion exhibited elevated FOXA1 activity while the brain NEPC lesion showed elevated HOXC10, NFYB, and OTX2 expression suggesting novel roles in NEPC formation or brain tropism. Our results highlight the utility of performing multi-omic characterization, especially in rare cancer subtypes.

A molecular switch from tumor suppressor to oncogene in ER+ve breast cancer: Role of androgen receptor, JAK-STAT, and lineage plasticity

Cancers develop resistance to inhibitors of oncogenes mainly due to target-centric mechanisms such as mutations and splicing. While inhibitors or antagonists force targets to unnatural conformation contributing to protein instability and resistance, activating tumor suppressors may maintain the protein in an agonistic conformation to elicit sustainable growth inhibition. Due to the lack of tumor suppressor agonists, this hypothesis and the mechanisms underlying resistance are not understood. In estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer (BC), androgen receptor (AR) is a druggable tumor suppressor offering a promising avenue for this investigation. Spatial genomics suggests that the molecular portrait of AR-expressing BC cells in tumor microenvironment corresponds to better overall patient survival, clinically confirming AR's role as a tumor suppressor. Ligand activation of AR in ER-positive BC xenografts reprograms cistromes, inhibits oncogenic pathways, and promotes cellular elasticity toward a more differentiated state. Sustained AR activation results in cistrome rearrangement toward transcription factor PROP paired-like homeobox 1, transformation of AR into oncogene, and activation of the Janus kinase/signal transducer (JAK/STAT) pathway, all culminating in lineage plasticity to an aggressive resistant subtype. While the molecular profile of AR agonist-sensitive tumors corresponds to better patient survival, the profile represented in the resistant phenotype corresponds to shorter survival. Inhibition of activated oncogenes in resistant tumors reduces growth and resensitizes them to AR agonists. These findings indicate that persistent activation of a context-dependent tumor suppressor may lead to resistance through lineage plasticity-driven tumor metamorphosis. Our work provides a framework to explore the above phenomenon across multiple cancer types and underscores the importance of factoring sensitization of tumor suppressor targets while developing agonist-like drugs.

BCL2 expression is enriched in advanced prostate cancer with features of lineage plasticity.

The widespread use of potent androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) has led to an increasing emergence of AR-independent castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), typically driven by loss of AR expression, lineage plasticity, and transformation to prostate cancers (PCs) that exhibit phenotypes of neuroendocrine or basal-like cells. The anti-apoptotic protein BCL2 is upregulated in neuroendocrine cancers and may be a therapeutic target for this aggressive PC disease subset. There is an unmet clinical need, therefore, to clinically characterize BCL2 expression in metastatic CRPC (mCRPC), determine its association with AR expression, uncover its mechanisms of regulation, and evaluate BCL2 as a therapeutic target and/or biomarker with clinical utility. Here, using multiple PC biopsy cohorts and models, we demonstrate that BCL2 expression is enriched in AR-negative mCRPC, associating with shorter overall survival and resistance to ARSIs. Moreover, high BCL2 expression associates with lineage plasticity features and neuroendocrine marker positivity. We provide evidence that BCL2 expression is regulated by DNA methylation, associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and increased by the neuronal transcription factor ASCL1. Finally, BCL2 inhibition had antitumor activity in some, but not all, BCL2-positive PC models, highlighting the need for combination strategies to enhance tumor cell apoptosis and enrich response.

Protein-Based Predictive Biomarkers to Personalize Neoadjuvant Therapy for Bladder Cancer-A Systematic Review of the Current Status.

The clinical outcome of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is poor despite the approval of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or immunotherapy to improve overall survival after cystectomy. MIBC subtypes, immune, transcriptome, metabolomic signatures, and mutation burden have the potential to predict treatment response but none have been incorporated into clinical practice, as tumor heterogeneity and lineage plasticity influence their efficacy. Using the PRISMA statement, we conducted a systematic review of the literature, involving 135 studies published within the last five years, to identify studies reporting on the prognostic value of protein-based biomarkers for response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with MIBC. The studies were grouped based on biomarkers related to molecular subtypes, cancer stem cell, actin-cytoskeleton, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, apoptosis, and tumor-infiltrating immune cells. These studies show the potential of protein-based biomarkers, especially in the spatial context, to reduce the influence of tumor heterogeneity on a biomarker's prognostic capability. Nevertheless, currently, there is little consensus on the methodology, reagents, and the scoring systems to allow reliable assessment of the biomarkers of interest. Furthermore, the small sample size of several studies necessitates the validation of potential prognostic biomarkers in larger multicenter cohorts before their use for individualizing neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with MIBC.

Neuroendocrine Differentiation in Prostate Cancer Requires ASCL1.

Most patients with prostate adenocarcinoma develop resistance to therapies targeting the androgen receptor (AR). Consequently, a portion of these patients develop AR-independent neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC), a rapidly progressing cancer with limited therapies and poor survival outcomes. Current research to understand the progression to NEPC suggests a model of lineage plasticity whereby AR-dependent luminal-like tumors progress towards an AR-independent NEPC state. Genetic analysis of human NEPC identified frequent loss of RB1 and TP53, and the loss of both genes in experimental models mediates the transition to a neuroendocrine lineage. Transcriptomics studies have shown that lineage transcription factors ASCL1 and NEUROD1 are present in NEPC. In this study, we modeled the progression of prostate adenocarcinoma to NEPC by establishing prostate organoids and subsequently generating subcutaneous allograft tumors from genetically-engineered mouse models harboring Cre-induced loss of Rb1 and Trp53 with Myc overexpression (RPM). These tumors were heterogeneous and displayed adenocarcinoma, squamous, and neuroendocrine features. ASCL1 and NEUROD1 were expressed within neuroendocrine-defined regions, with ASCL1 being predominant. Genetic loss of Ascl1 in this model did not decrease tumor incidence, growth, or metastasis; however, there was a notable decrease in neuroendocrine identity and an increase in basal-like identity. This study provides an in vivo model to study progression to NEPC and establishes the requirement for ASCL1 in driving neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer.

The expression of YAP1 and other transcription factors contributes to lineage plasticity in combined small cell lung carcinoma.

Lineage plasticity in small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) causes therapeutic difficulties. This study aimed to investigate the pathological findings of plasticity in SCLC, focusing on combined SCLC, and elucidate the involvement of YAP1 and other transcription factors. We analysed 100 surgically resected SCLCs through detailed morphological observations and immunohistochemistry for YAP1 and other transcription factors. Component-by-component next-generation sequencing (n = 15 pairs) and immunohistochemistry (n = 35 pairs) were performed on the combined SCLCs. Compared with pure SCLCs (n = 65), combined SCLCs (n = 35) showed a significantly larger size, higher expression of NEUROD1, and higher frequency of double-positive transcription factors (p = 0.0009, 0.04, and 0.019, respectively). Notably, 34% of the combined SCLCs showed morphological mosaic patterns with unclear boundaries between the SCLC and its partner. Combined SCLCs not only had unique histotypes as partners but also represented different lineage plasticity within the partner. NEUROD1-dominant combined SCLCs had a significantly higher proportion of adenocarcinomas as partners, whereas POU2F3-dominant combined SCLCs had a significantly higher proportion of squamous cell carcinomas as partners (p = 0.006 and p = 0.0006, respectively). YAP1 expression in SCLC components was found in 80% of combined SCLCs and 62% of pure SCLCs, often showing mosaic-like expression. Among the combined SCLCs with component-specific analysis, the identical TP53 mutation was found in 10 pairs, and the identical Rb1 abnormality was found in 2 pairs. On immunohistochemistry, the same abnormal p53 pattern was found in 34 pairs, and Rb1 loss was found in 24 pairs. In conclusion, combined SCLC shows a variety of pathological plasticity. Although combined SCLC is more plastic than pure SCLC, pure SCLC is also a phenotypically plastic tumour. The morphological mosaic pattern and YAP1 mosaic-like expression may represent ongoing lineage plasticity. This study also identified the relationship between transcription factors and partners in combined SCLC. Transcription factors may be involved in differentiating specific cell lineages beyond just 'neuroendocrine'.

Treatment-induced stemness and lineage plasticity in driving prostate cancer therapy resistance.

Most human cancers are heterogeneous consisting of cancer cells at different epigenetic and transcriptional states and with distinct phenotypes, functions, and drug sensitivities. This inherent cancer cell heterogeneity contributes to tumor resistance to clinical treatment, especially the molecularly targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs). Therapeutic interventions, in turn, induce lineage plasticity (also called lineage infidelity) in cancer cells that also drives therapy resistance. In this Perspective, we focus our discussions on cancer cell lineage plasticity manifested as treatment-induced switching of epithelial cancer cells to basal/stem-like, mesenchymal, and neural lineages. We employ prostate cancer (PCa) as the prime example to highlight ARSI-induced lineage plasticity during and towards development of castration-resistant PCa (CRPC). We further discuss how the tumor microenvironment (TME) influences therapy-induced lineage plasticity. Finally, we offer an updated summary on the regulators and mechanisms driving cancer cell lineage infidelity, which should be therapeutically targeted to extend the therapeutic window and improve patients' survival.

Targeting SWI/SNF ATPases reduces neuroblastoma cell plasticity.

Tumor cell heterogeneity defines therapy responsiveness in neuroblastoma (NB), a cancer derived from neural crest cells. NB consists of two primary subtypes: adrenergic and mesenchymal. Adrenergic traits predominate in NB tumors, while mesenchymal features becomes enriched post-chemotherapy or after relapse. The interconversion between these subtypes contributes to NB lineage plasticity, but the underlying mechanisms driving this phenotypic switching remain unclear. Here, we demonstrate that SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex ATPases are essential in establishing an mesenchymal gene-permissive chromatin state in adrenergic-type NB, facilitating lineage plasticity. Targeting SWI/SNF ATPases with SMARCA2/4 dual degraders effectively inhibits NB cell proliferation, invasion, and notably, cellular plasticity, thereby preventing chemotherapy resistance. Mechanistically, depletion of SWI/SNF ATPases compacts cis-regulatory elements, diminishes enhancer activity, and displaces core transcription factors (MYCN, HAND2, PHOX2B, and GATA3) from DNA, thereby suppressing transcriptional programs associated with plasticity. These findings underscore the pivotal role of SWI/SNF ATPases in driving intrinsic plasticity and therapy resistance in neuroblastoma, highlighting an epigenetic target for combinational treatments in this cancer.

Genomic and transcriptomic features of androgen receptor signaling inhibitor resistance in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUNDAndrogen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) have improved outcomes for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but their clinical benefit is limited by treatment resistance.METHODSTo investigate the mechanisms of ARSI resistance, we analyzed the whole-genome (n = 45) and transcriptome (n = 31) sequencing data generated from paired metastatic biopsies obtained before initiation of first-line ARSI therapy for mCRPC and after radiographic disease progression. We investigated the effects of genetic and pharmacologic modulation of SSTR1 in 22Rv1 cells, a representative mCRPC cell line.RESULTSWe confirmed the predominant role of tumor genetic alterations converging on augmenting androgen receptor (AR) signaling and the increased transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage plasticity during the emergence of ARSI resistance. We further identified amplifications involving a putative enhancer downstream of the AR and transcriptional downregulation of SSTR1, encoding somatostatin receptor 1, in ARSI-resistant tumors. We found that patients with SSTR1-low mCRPC tumors derived less benefit from subsequent ARSI therapy in a retrospective cohort. We showed that SSTR1 was antiproliferative in 22Rv1 cells and that the FDA-approved drug pasireotide suppressed 22Rv1 cell proliferation.CONCLUSIONOur findings expand the knowledge of ARSI resistance and point out actionable next steps, exemplified by potentially targeting SSTR1, to improve patient outcomes.FUNDINGNational Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH; Prostate Cancer Foundation; Conquer Cancer, American Society of Clinical Oncology Foundation; UCSF Benioff Initiative for Prostate Cancer Research; Netherlands Cancer Institute.