Abstract Introduction The assessment of swelling following burn injury is complicated by the presence of wounds and dressings, particularly as the patient cohort experience significant pain, impaired movement, and may require medications that result in modified behavior. Further, traditional measures of volume, such as water displacement volumetry (WDV) or circumferential limb measures may pose increased infection risk and pain due to contact with open wounds. Clinically, edema is most often assessed by noting loss of skin creases, palpation of areas of visible swelling, and loss of function, as there remains a lack of sensitive objective measures for edema in patients with hand burn injury. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is a measure of body composition that has been demonstrated by our group to be reliable for measuring whole body and limb edema during resuscitation, and to be sensitive to local edema changes within healing wounds. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of BIS as a measure of edema following hand burn injury. Methods One hundred patients presenting with hand burn injury were recruited to this trial. Repeated volume measures of the hand were recorded using a novel application of BIS, and repeated using WDV. The results were analysed using multi-level mixed effects regressions. The use of BIS electrodes on the dorsum of the middle finger at the DIP and MCPJ levels, and dorsum of the wrist and forearm have been previously described for measuring lymphedema. Results Paired repeated measures were obtained for 195 hands. Alternate electrode positions on the palm of the middle finger and hand, and volar wrist and forearm, and a combination of palmar hand / dorsal forearm were assessed. There was no evidence of a significant difference between these electrode configurations and the previously described dorsal hand / forearm configuration (position x distance interaction, p=0.608–0.802). Dorsal hand / volar forearm configuration was significantly different (position x distance interaction, p=0.006) from the standard electrode position described. Comparison with WDV demonstrated a strong correlation (r=0.79; limits of agreement 198-460mL; bias 329mL). Reliability of BIS was determined by ICC: 0.9978–0.9999 (CI 0.9967–0.9999). Conclusions Compared to WDV, BIS is a valid and reliable measure of edema following acute hand burn injury. This study also confirmed the interchangeability of multiple BIS electrode positions. Applicability of Research to Practice BIS offers a real time measure of fluid (change) within the extracellular space, and therefore edema in patients with hand burn injury, while minimizing the risk of infection and increased pain in burns patients. The interchangeability of electrode positions provides clinicians with a number of flexible options to accommodate locations of hand burn wounds, thus allowing between patient comparisons.
Read full abstract