Likelihood Of Hearing Preservation Research Articles

Analysis of Hearing Preservation in Middle Cranial Fossa Resection of Vestibular Schwannoma.

Describe the effect of preoperative hearing on the likelihood of hearing preservation after middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach for resection of vestibular schwannoma (VS) and the effect of hearing preservation on disease-specific quality of life (QOL). Retrospective chart review. Academic tertiary care skull base surgery program. Sixty three adult patients with preoperative word recognition score (WRS) ≥50% who underwent MCF resection of VS between 2017 and 2020. All patients underwent MCF VS resection with attempted hearing preservation. Hearing preservation (postoperative WRS ≥50%), hearing-related Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL) score. Sixty three patients with mean age 47.4 (±9.6) years and tumor size 11.5 (±0.5) mm were analyzed. Hearing was preserved (+HP) and lost (-HP) in 37 (58.7%) and 26 (41.3%) patients, respectively. Preoperatively, pure tone average audiometry was significantly lower among the +HP group (20.0 dB) versus -HP (31.0 dB, p < 0.003). WRS was higher among +HP versus -HP (94% vs. 84%, respectively; p < 0.002). Linear regression showed that intra- versus extra-canalicular tumor location, sudden hearing loss history, fundal fluid cap thickness, and tumor size had no relationship to hearing preservation outcomes. When evaluating postoperative QOL data (n = 37) hearing-related PANQOL score differed between +HP and -HP (t35 = 2.458, p = 0.0191) groups. In this cohort of patients undergoing MCF resection of VS, rates of HP were higher for patients with excellent preoperative hearing. Postoperatively, +HP patients reported improved hearing-related PANQOL scores compared to -HP patients.

Relationship Between Intraoperative Electrocochleography and Hearing Preservation.

To compare intraoperative intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) with hearing preservation outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) subjects. Intraoperative electrocochleography was performed in adult CI subjects who were recipients of Advanced Bionics' Bionics LLC precurved HiFocus MidScala or straight HiFocus SlimJ electrode arrays. ECochG responses were recorded from the most apical electrode contact during insertion. No changes to the insertions were made due to ECochG monitoring. No information about insertion resistance was collected. ECochG drops were estimated as the change in amplitude from peak (defined as maximum amplitude response) to drop (largest drop) point after the peak during insertion was measured following the peak response. Audiometric thresholds from each subject were obtained before and approximately 1 month after CI surgery. The change in pure tone average for frequencies between 125 Hz and 500 Hz was measured after surgery. No postoperative CT scans were collected as part of this study. A total of 68 subjects from five surgical centers participated in the study. The study sample included 30 MidScala and 38 SlimJ electrodes implanted by approximately 20 surgeons who contributed to the study. Although a wide range of results were observed, there was a moderate positive correlation (Pearson Correlation coefficient, r = 0.56, p < 0.01) between the size of the ECochG drop and the magnitude of pure tone average change. This trend was present for both the MidScala and SlimJ arrays. The SlimJ and MidScala arrays produced significantly different hearing loss after surgery. Large ECochG amplitude drops observed during electrode insertion indicated poorer hearing preservation. Although the outcomes were variable, this information may be helpful to guide surgical decision-making when contemplating full electrode insertion and the likelihood of hearing preservation.

Preoperative Sudden Hearing Loss May Predict Hearing Preservation After Retrosigmoid Resection of Vestibular Schwannoma.

Describe the effect of preoperative sudden hearing loss (SHL) on likelihood of hearing preservation (HP) after surgical resection of vestibular schwannoma (VS). Retrospective chart review. Tertiary referral center. Adult patients (≥18 years) who underwent retrosigmoid VS resection for HP between February 2008 and December 2018 were reviewed. All patients had preoperative word recognition score (WRS) of at least 50%. Similarly, HP was defined as postoperative WRS of more than or equal to 50%. Regression analysis was used to describe the effect of SHL on HP, accounting for tumor size, and preoperative hearing quality. All patients underwent retrosigmoid VS resection for HP. WRS of at least 50%. Of 160 patients who underwent retrosigmoid VS resection during the study period, 153 met inclusion criteria. Mean tumor size was 14.0 (±6) mm. Hearing was preserved in 41.8% (n = 64). Forty patients (26.1%) had a history of preoperative SHL. Among 138 patients (90.2%) in whom the cochlear nerve was anatomically preserved during surgery, HP was achieved in 61.8% of those with SHL (21 of 34) and 41.3% of those without SHL (43 of 104) (p = 0.0480). On univariate and multivariate analysis (accounting for tumor size and preoperative hearing quality), SHL was a significant positive predictor of HP (odds ratio 2.292, p = 0.0407 and odds ratio 2.778, p = 0.0032, respectively). In patients with VS and retained serviceable hearing, SHL is an independent predictor of HP after retrosigmoid microsurgical resection when the cochlear nerve is preserved.

The Effect of Tumor Size on Likelihood of Hearing Preservation After Retrosigmoid Vestibular Schwannoma Resection.

1) Describe the effect of tumor size on the likelihood of hearing preservation after retrosigmoid approach for resection of vestibular schwannoma (VS).2) Describe the effect of preoperative hearing status on the likelihood of hearing preservation. Retrospective chart review. Tertiary referral center. Adult (18 years or older) patients underwent retrosigmoid VS resection and postoperative audiometry between 2008 and 2018 and had a preoperative word recognition score (WRS) of at least 50%. Patients with a history of neurofibromatosis 2, radiation, or previous resection were excluded. All patients underwent retrosigmoid VS resection with attempted hearing preservation. WRS of at least 50%. Data from 153 patients were analyzed. Mean age was 50.8 (±11.3) years and mean tumor size 14 (±6) mm. Hearing was preserved and lost in 64 (41.8%) and 89 (58.2%) patients, respectively. Hearing preservation rates were higher for intrameatal tumors than for tumors with extrameatal extension (57.6% versus 29.4%, p = 0.0005). On univariate and multivariate regression analysis, tumor size (per mm increase) was a negative predictor of hearing preservation (odds ratio [OR] 0.893, p = 0.0002 and 0.841, p = 0.0005, respectively). Preoperative American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Hearing Class was also predictive of hearing preservation (p = 0.0044). Class A hearing (compared with class B hearing) was the strongest positive risk factor for hearing preservation (OR 3.149, p = 0.0048 and 1.236, p = 0.0005, respectively). Small tumor size and preoperative class A hearing are positive predictors of hearing preservation in patients undergoing the retrosigmoid approach for VS resection.

Negative influence of preoperative tinnitus on hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery.

Goals of vestibular schwannoma (VS) microsurgery are maximal resection, facial nerve (FN) preservation and in selected cases, hearing preservation (HP). Postoperative HP rates are related to clinical and radiographic factors: size of tumor, preoperative hearing, hypertension, diabetes, and presence or absence of preoperative tinnitus. In this retrospective review we evaluated the influence of preoperative tinnitus on HP after VS surgery in patients with preoperative socially useful hearing (SUH). Twenty-five patients with SUH underwent VS micro neurosurgery by retrosigmoid (RS) approach. Selection criteria were pure tone audiogram ≤50dB loss and speech discrimination score >50% (50/50 criterion, AAO-HNS class A-B). In relation to maximum diameter, we identified two size-groups: 1) group A ≤2cm (13 cases); 2) group B >2cm (12 cases). HP attempt was assisted by intraoperative ABR evoked by LS CE-Chirp® (Interacustics, Middelfart, Denmark) acoustic stimuli. Mean age was 44.3 years (20-64); average maximum diameter 2,0cm (0,8-4). Preoperative tinnitus was present in 10 patients (40%): all of them had a Class B-hearing. Total and nearly-total (>95%) resection was possible in all. Mortality and major morbidity were zero. In all, facial nerve (FN) was anatomically and functionally preserved; in 10 an incomplete FN deficit was followed by complete recovery within 2-8 weeks. At a follow-up ranging from 8 to 17 months (average 12.7 months), socially useful hearing (SUH) preservation rate was 52%, with significant differences in relation to size: 61.5% group A and 41.7% group B (P=0.014). Postoperative AAO-HNS C (serviceable) hearing was observed in 36%, deafness in 12%. At last follow-up, among the 10 patients with preoperative tinnitus 6 worsened from Class-B to Class-C, 3 remained in Class-B, and one was deaf. As regards SUH preservation, 3 of 10 patients with preoperative tinnitus and 10 of 15 without it remained in Class-A-B (P=0.006). Microsurgery represents the first therapeutic option for small growing VS with SUH. Our data confirm that key-hole RS removal of VS with intraoperative LS-CE-Chirp ABR monitoring allows good rate of SUH preservation, especially maximum diameter does not exceed 2cm. Preoperative tinnitus seems to indicate a lower hearing reserve and predicts a lower likelihood of HP.

Translabyrinthine Approach for Large Acoustic Tumors

Introduction: The translabyrinthine approach is preferred for removal of vestibular schwannomas in patients with poor hearing, and the likelihood of hearing preservation is slight. However, the choice of approach for surgical removal of large acoustic neuromas is still controversial. The authors reviewed the results in a series of patients who underwent removal of large neuromas via the translabyrinthine approach.

Gamma knife radiosurgery for intracanalicular acoustic neuromas

In the present study we reviewed our long-term experience with radiosurgery for intracanalicular acoustic neuromas. The study involved 25 patients with unilateral intracanalicular acoustic neuromas. The treatment volume was 0.07 to 0.8 cm 3 (median: 0.27 cm 3). The marginal radiation dose used for treatment was 12 Gy for all patients. The follow-up period ranged from 36 to 132 months (mean: 89 months). The actuarial rate of tumour growth control at 5 and 10 years after radiosurgery was 96%. Hearing preservation was achieved in 16 patients (64%) and improvement (>20 dB relative to presurgical values) was noted in one patient (4%). No patients experienced post-radiosurgery facial palsy or other cranial nerve deficits. Based on our study and long-term follow-up, radiosurgery can produce high rates of tumour growth control and hearing preservation for intracanalicular acoustic neuromas, and is an alternative to surgical resection given its low level of invasiveness. When determining treatment for intracanalicular acoustic neuromas, the condition’s benign natural course and the likelihood of hearing preservation must be taken into account.

Suboccipital resection of a medial acoustic neuroma with hearing preservation

BACKGROUND Many reports indicate that acoustic neuromas greater than 2.0 cm should be removed without hearing preservation attempted, even if hearing is present preoperatively. These studies advocate a translabyrinthine approach because the likelihood of hearing preservation is low. Medial acoustic neuromas, unlike the more common lateral tumors that involve the internal auditory canal, originate medial to that portion of the eighth nerve complex where the cochlear and vestibular nerves are fused. This anatomical feature suggests that these tumors may be amenable to resection with hearing preservation. METHODS A patient with a 3.5 cm medial acoustic neuroma and useful preoperative hearing is presented. RESULTS Gross total tumor removal with functional hearing was achieved after a two-stage procedure using a suboccipital approach. CONCLUSION Based on the anatomico-pathologic features in this case, we believe that, if a patient has reasonable preoperative hearing (speech discrimination score > 70%) and a medial acoustic neuroma, an approach to preserve hearing should be considered regardless of tumor size.

Translabyrinthine Approach For Acoustic Tumor Removal

The translabyrinthine approach is the most direct route to the cerebellopontine angle. It is the preferred approach for removal of all tumors in patients with poor hearing and for large tumors when the likelihood of hearing preservation is slight. This approach offers the advantages of minimum cerebellar retraction, identification of the facial nerve proximally and medially, and the ability to repair immediately the facial nerve if it is severed during acoustic tumor removal. This approach has the lowest morbidity with regard to spinal fluid leaks and also postoperative headaches.