This study aimed to determine whether interrupting prolonged sitting with brief bouts of light-intensity activity (ISIT), undertaking structured high-intensity interval training (HIIT), or the combination of both interventions would elicit greater cardiometabolic benefits. Seventeen healthy adults (22-50 years) were recruited to undertake three 2-week interventions in a random order: i) HIIT (6 HIIT sessions + <5000 steps following the session and on the next day), ii) ISIT (2.5 min light-intensity walking every hour for 12 h/day on weekdays), and iii) HIIT+ISIT. Participants underwent a 6-day lead-in phase prior to each condition (day 1-3: normal activity, day 4-6 sedentary: <5000 steps/day). Pre and post assessments included glycemic control (primary outcome 2-h postprandial glucose), endothelial function via flow-mediated dilation (FMD), cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition. Changes in primary and secondary outcomes were assessed via repeated measures ANOVA. Eleven participants completed all conditions (8 Female, 33±5 years, 23±4 kg/m2, habitual activity 7,156±2,272 steps/day). FMD significantly improved following HIIT+ISIT when compared to ISIT (+1.04±1.20%, p=0.02), but there were no differences when ISIT was directly compared to HIIT. Cardiorespiratory fitness improved significantly following HIIT+ISIT when compared to ISIT (+1.88±2.03 mL/kg/min, p=0.01) but there were no differences when ISIT alone was compared to HIIT. There were no significant differences between groups for outcomes related to glucose control or body composition. HIIT+ISIT elicits greater improvements in cardiovascular outcomes when compared to ISIT but not HIIT. The benefits of structured exercise, such as HIIT, may go beyond those achieved by limiting sedentary behavior alone.
Read full abstract